ML20132C897

Submits Final Progress Rept Re Insp of Plant Const Assessment Program for 850603-14.Insp Activities Will Be Completed by 850630.Addl Insps Will Be Documented in Insp Repts

ML20132C897
Person / Time
Site:	Braidwood
Issue date:	06/27/1985
From:	Norelius C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:	James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
Shared Package
ML20132C895	List: IR 05000456/1985030 ML20132C897
References
NUDOCS 8507310058
Download: ML20132C897 (2)

Text

d#40,0 UNITED STATES

'[ g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION y )3(i SE nEcion m Ei /+

799 ROOSEVELT RO AD cLEN ELLvN. stunOis som JUN 2 7 G85

.=72 MEMORANDUM FOR: James G. Keppler, Regional Administrator FROM:

C. E. Norelius, Director, Division of Reactor Projects

SUBJECT:

FINAL PROGRESS REPORT - INSPECTION OF BRAIDWOOD CONSTRUCTION ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (B, CAP)

The following information was provided by the NRC inspector assigned to follow <

the BCAP. It covers the period of June 3 through June 14, 1985. BCAP inspec-tion activities will essentially be completed by June 30, 1985, and full time NRC inspection coverage will end at that time. Additional inspections will be conducted from the Region III office and will be documented in inspection reports; therefore, this is the final progress report. CECO will present their conclusions for seven to fourteen of the CSR populations in the public meeting on June 25, 1985. The final BCAP presentation to the NRC is scheduled for mid-August 1985, and the final BCAP report is to be issued by mid-September, 1985. Mr. Gardner will remain active in all of these activities, including any preparation for and participation in the ASLB hearing if the QA contention is admitted.

BCAP Status Construction Sample Reinspection (CSR) reinspection activities have been com-pleted for all populations except NSSS Support Verification. As of June 11, 1985, 3912 observations have been issued by the BCAP taskforce to document CSR reinspection findings. Documentation reviews have been completed for all populations except NSSS equipment installation and NSSS support verification.

As of June 11, 1985, 3065 observations have been issued by the BCAP taskforce to document CSR documentation review findings. The Reverification of Procedures to Specification Requirements (RPSR) BCAP element has completed the reviews of contractor procedures. The Review of Significant Corrective Action Programs (RSCAP) BCAP element has continued during this review period. ERC personnel have been onsite performing reviews. Total BCAP manpower is presently 102 personnel.

Review of BCAP Program During this review period the inspector performed the following reviews of BCAP activities:

1. reviewed CSR reinspection checklists

2. reviewed CSR documentation review checklists 8507310058 850710 6 }

PDR ADOCK 0500 G

Attachment 1 of 2 1

James G. Keppler 2 PJUN 2 7 1985-

3. reviewed BCAP discrepancies ~

4. reviewed CSR reinspection activities

~ ~~- e-

5. reviewed RPSR activities

6. reviewed CSR overinspection activities Problem Areas Identified No significant problems were identified during this review period.

Status of Open Items To ensure the proper tracking and closure of open items identified in the NRC BCAP progress reports, all open items will be uniquely identified and tracked to closure.

Open items which have not been closed to date and their current status are as follows:  %

9. (Closed) ERC observation regarding reinspection deficiencies. All ERC observations regarding BCAP reinspection deficiencies have been closed.

Discussions with ERC inspectors indicate that BCAP reinspections have been performed in a satisfactory manner. This item is closed.

11. (Closed) S&L discrepancy evaluations reference calculations which are not in the discrepancy file. In addition, the S&L evaluations include the invalidation of discrepancies without sufficient justification. The NRC has determined that the backup calculations for the S&L evaluations are located onsite in the S&L office. In addition, BCAP QA is reviewing all invalidated observations to ensure that sufficient justification was present to support the invalidations.

C. E. Norelius Division of Reactor Projects cc: J. H. Taylor, IE J. G. Partlow, IE H. L. Thompson, NRR A. B. Davis, RIII E. Chan, ELD J. Stevens, NRR M. Wallace, CECO Braidwood SRIs Attachment 2 of 2