ML20132C649

Forwards Rev 9 to Physical Security Plan.Rev Removes Implication in Section 4.1 of SOP-F.1 Not Subj to 10CFR73.71.Change Labeled Technical Change Notice.Rev Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790)

ML20132C649
Person / Time
Site:	05000083
Issue date:	09/06/1985
From:	Vernetson W FLORIDA, UNIV. OF, GAINESVILLE, FL
To:	Grace J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
References
NUDOCS 8509270107
Download: ML20132C649 (1)

Text

$.

. 5 .olu.omic'oa NUCLEAR FACILITIES DIVISION CG. YE RNtiSON, RE ACTOR MANAGE R NUCLEAR REACTOR BUILDING GAINE5'/lLLE. FLORIDA 32611 UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA .

e .

8"

PHONE (90413921429 TE Lt1< $6330 September $ 1985 A"ATEmL Tw!N*tTTm 9' nrWITH cn C

CC ,

rm ,, a

' Oz U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II U $$

P. O. Box 2203 jg Atlanta, Georgia 30301 c:a o-6

.. CJ "

Attention: J. Nelson Grace g Regional Administrator ,g,,

Re: University of Florida Training Reactor Physical Security Plan License No: R-56, Docket No. 50-83

Dear Sir:

The enclosed package contains Revision 9 of the Physical Security Plan (PSP) for the University of Florida Training Reactor. Only two small sections on one page of SOP-P.1 are involved; this change is responsive to discussions with Ms. O. Masnyk of Region II on July 23, 1985 and in official response to the request to change Section 4.1 as transmitted in a letter dated July 30, 1985 from Mr. Roger Walker, Region II Director, Division of Reactor Projects.

The changes involve only Sections 4.1 and 4.2 on Page 4 of SOP-F.1 ; the effect of the changes are to remove the apparent but unintended implication in Section 4.1 that we were not subject to the applicable reporting requirements of 10 CFR 73.71. As explained to Ms. Masnyk, the only intent was to document that public disclosure of our Physical Security Plan is not required. There-fore, the change to Section 4.1 and to Section 4.2 involves simply stating that details of the Physical Security Plan and of SOP-F.1 are protected from public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 2.790(d). Since the change does not change the original intent of the SOP, we have labeled it as a Technical Change Notice within the SOP-F.1 but we will treat it as Revision 9 to our Physical Security Plan to maintain plan continuity. This treatment and the change were approved by our Safety Review Subcommittee on September 6, 1985.

As explained above, these changes do not reduce the security level repre-sented in the current UPTR Physical Security Plan. If there is need for fur-ther information, please let us know.

Sincerely, J ,

William G. Vernetson Acting Director of Nuclear Facilities Enclosures cc: Diractor Nuclear Reactor Regulation Standardization and Special Projects Branch U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 pS/

8509270107 850906 ' I PDR ADOCK 05000083

,3y 4 F PDR v===mi urm imovia i

,