Text

Makes Proposal to NRC Re Need for Independent Review of Licensee Operations of Plant to Verify Adequacy of Licensee Efforts
	ML20132B232
Person / Time
Site:	Millstone
Issue date:	10/09/1996
From:	; AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:	Shirley Ann Jackson, The Chairman; NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML20132B213	List: ML20132B209; ML20132B232;
References
	NUDOCS 9612170108
	Download: ML20132B232 (12)
	v • d • e

._.

l._

7 - u ty Citizens Regulatory Commission 4

i Steering Committee j

1 180 Great Neck Road

{

Wataford, CT. 06385 l

l October 9,1996 i

Dr. Shirley Ann Jackson Chairman i.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission l

Washington, D. C. 20555-0001 i

l j

Deer Dr. Jackson-t l

De Citizens Regulatory Commission ( CRC ) formed to represent the interests of the commimities surrounding the Millstone Nuclear Power Complex. Our interest is to ensure the safe j

operation of these plants. Many in our group have lived in the surrounding communities for years. Deep j

concern was stimulated by the Millstone whistle blowers and the media regarding public safety issues.

Our worst fears seem to be coming true on a daily basis. We are lea with no advocate for the public at t

i I

these plants, as they have all been removed through settlement agreements with Nwtheast Utilities (NU ),

or by inaction on the part of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC ) with regard to employee

]

l protection proWsions.

ne purpose of this letter is to make proposals to the NRC regarding > cur admitted need for an independent review to verify the adequacy of the licensee's eforts We would like to go further, and address a number ofissues we believe are necessary to foster trust and fairness into the current Independent Corrective Action Veri 6 cation Plan ( ICAVP ).

l Having NU pick the ICAVP team, and having the NRC approw the teamisn't sitting too well l

with the general public. His v,as evidenced by the petitions submitted to your staff at a recent ICAVP l

l informationel meeting Additionally, having your

.. leWghtpr the ICAVP to look at, and to determine N does not comfort us too well based on past NRC practices with con 6dentiality issues. Also, Unit # 3 has about 222 systems,143 of l

which NU does not inted any System Snartfic Asassaments. It only plans an FSAR update, and an i

engineering programs review NU will do System Speci6c Assessments on about 80 systems, and of that, a very small amount ( We understand approx. 6 ) will be designated for an ICAVP review by the NRC.

His doesn't look to us like much of a review to verify the adequacy of the limana*'s etarts-and that bias l

e nucient industry, if a vendor s. 99Wud as Sergeant & Lundy is selecte M W 2 0 WIul.seleuess W

- 9 4

l being in var i

employed by this contractor will have an allegiance to their management and will do whatever management wants. No matter what safeguards are in place, or what types of nuclear concerns programs MasItWtuusdIN aelIENsurvivm1Ds2486ral l

are used, i

mebyalisestquygne'

" ~ hbin theneelserindesey.

w i

l We would like to propose an ind=p== dant selection team called People for Responsible Ovmight j

Veri 6mtice ( PROV ). De team would be ocenposed of nine ( 9 ) members. Two selected by the CRC, two from, or selected by the Connessicut Nuclear Energy Advisory Council ( NEAC ), two tom, or selecsed by the NRC, two tom or selected by NU, and one from academia ( Yale, MIT, Harvard etc. ).

The eight ( 8 ) individuals selected by the CRC, NU, NEAC, and NRC would select the ninth member t

i from academia through a mutually agrosable process.

j h

i 9612170100 961209 PDR COMMS NRCC CORRESPONDENCE PDR

-. _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _I Members firam NU and the CRC on the NEAC would nor be allowed to serve on the PROV.

NRC members shall have had no prior connection to Millstone, or NU. ne tnanbers of the PROV team would determine the selection criteria for estaNishing the ICAVP. Jt would take al'3 majority ( 6 members agreeing )of PROV to approve any criteria. De ICAVP would be paid through the NRC via its normal contractor billing arrangement, or through the normal billing process the NRC utilizes to recover oversight costs from all utilities.

Because of concerns about the history of programmatic weakness, the failure to require the buplementation of effective corrective actions, the failure to require and maintain a safety-conscious environment supporting licensee stoployees, and failure to property enforce it's own requirements, the NRC Ands itselfin a position that lacks credibility with the public.

In order to restore the public trust and a sese ofintegrity to the NRC, we are recommending that, you Chairman Jackson, appoint a Special Oversight Team for Millstone Statxei. De Team should consist of the neessaary managers and staff to adequately oversee all the programs, and areas not being verifled by the ICAVP. The NRC Special Oversight Team should have the same criteria imposed on it, as that required of the ICAVP.

The Commission should establish the areas to be looked at, level of review of the team, and the acceptance criteria. Based on past restart weaknesses at Unit #2, by previous NRC oversight teams, we must insist on a complete overhaul of the current oversight system. He organizational chain for the Special Oversight Team should be changed to delete any NRC management previously involved in oversight at Millstone, including EDO, NRR, Enforcement, and Regional managers and staff, involved m i

allowing such poor oversight to occur.

As we pointed out earlier Dr. Jackson, we are very concerned about the fairness of the current proposal. Public trust has been damaged substantially, and the credibility of the NRC and the whole nuclear industry is at stake. We expect a fair and valid system of veri 6 cation. The current system is neither.

Sincerely, f%

k Q tw

>>n kt. CMa

+

dg %

A. y[ WL&y

[j,a.c'AcuEu g" _% cz y am

~

yLNhue AQm p gb,.,

e CRC Ste. ems C.m

c. n..s adh

}hr.e,in

~

c

~

We the undersigned, believe that Northeast Utilities should not be the selector of the independent verification team on whose approval the Nuclear Regulatory Commission har mandated as a necessary step prior to the start up of the Millstone Units. As residents of the localities which adjoin the Millstone Power Station, we seriously question the independence of any group which is selected and paid for by the same utility on whom they are supposed to be performing an objective assessment and evaluation. We urge the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to rescind this decision and remove Northeast Utilities from any involvement in the selection of the start up verification team.

Narne Address b A,a k s u e e 'e,.r ck O' Oc, IC tb 0

('u We.f stil.-s y'

u;. wu i:

2 :~ c t wI l u.,

11

C, a;., G., r iu /,/

h,,,

f s

Y $,W jMkls Y

Y b1Ltr's$.-<

. < /1

' @ RDx 2 DRTVUH+'

m1yfRuby/Ei.% -t. i s

' M J: v n,.p~

z -n 's n LL..

i.,.,

~.,. /

l

=

,W 4A,.n,(\\

s s

\\

+ 3. 2

,, j s, 2 b

. 5 _,

w

~<*Y f f l't' f

4 f?'

l tL I. * ! I rif

.1

$ i N8L.' W/ i %I

' N ! & Q.!. % k~': / I.,':1(5 L'c d /

A v...

AL

.z

, n.6 d..-

Ali A..:- N _%U.

i< 9 -uramus ba o n Gm ~.. 7

$ wN N%W

$ j la v w,v h *'

,_/

rs

. /

( ',. :-.

? c.

>.g

., & O :s.

1

~i l3 A.) k i hJti)4?,.6 lMP,W !iM M 4Q U

'(M-N 30 eicu wopo fl% - e"/.Ma-e

! //rY0 Y

f'.4 8

m, I

r-s

%L x..J,1 % n mnwn A,- L ni,o c..

$. 4 d>F?)

.Jw'..J (J.& %;-

N

]!w>b C%.k

?

?\\

l.N ll li!M Gk! h { N bto L k tfe-2

%T Cs w 4A (L t b ry r n, * '

I"!i ( l0 R.f0 <

f :, d YL/ ' h,, f,'/ t f r~j (

. t (Y f r' ($ C N } hN

! n ( C c). k Nr u G.. -

1

-1 1 -

As l I LJ't a Y ' 61.

))V b ln v '.v. r _ l.,

kL l/2 L'

'l +

l w/

T U)

[ ( 4. -

Sw I

N bt'

$9 W 1rrm/mrnl b $ 0 & [<,k<\\

YANfl $AAb&}bb

/r mn & AG Lad n (BLDn 19 Ma %M 29 2 Gml,nc<htr 6/o)l. M Ad w [M dP~

m c t % % u u m di d u Lt d h

\\

1% h A. L a h

a '-. I da u Al

&^

/

I I

l l

l

d We the undersigned. believe that Northeast Utilities should not be the selector of the independent verification team on whose approval the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has mandated as a necessary step prior to the start up of the Millstone Units. As residents of the localities which adjoin the Millstone Power Station, we seriously question the independence of any group which is selected and paid for by the same utility on whom they are supposed to be performing an objective assessment and evaluation. We urge the Nuclear Regulatory Coiamission to rescind this decision and remove Northeast Utilities from any involvement in the selection of the start up verification team.

Name Address O kJ t. A N m.m o

r' u si, -

M NI cr

,w

q

)

'i n

we r :,+

, /

,s.,d Ng

, / t.' l.

n?vt, % cyht<r3 /(

_d t [h4 7e/ 4/ At-x,s, 4

/ i: je, a m -

usiunc? B>

S / n,c 1%

Dt. lb u. O SL E't

.. kL' ~

(. ?.~

s

?2v'/[/$} & n a d

'u c/

a I1' 9 Ii'usk >CL DivY f[/5Ki.,

i 'l,,, s., N.

J.

?! %.

C'2

% J l.,._,

,)f

,o. <: y...,

" lm!w h'A {a

//OhAL!/ End

'/'bn2$

lN[ W I W l$

I L \\1swke 4.98Gli.t4/!ite/N~

t l A dic)> A' G

[l?/fcic.L'n 'l'_,a E 5 " ys 1J < _

t' v

k%],,

u n

o h

.I' d r E ' u C

((18 iN' U-N I P 4 J 2~~C N=~< c 2h wCFXi L,.

'4 %n' -iTaok kA bv.Lrk.g-b bb a d m e

1 sTerJN 6 A s'. 5 7 c 4 M

,7_ 3,?.o,m uco S T

u. w u ~ %.t n,.

WRAL F 0 tf&m I 3 7-A/IA"D c

& vist As.

a.> TIS 4 oc Jr.,

$/i

//if /' ','; f :7 ? / k pgQ - 7]d,,,,1, //

'N? ivil/g

% M, a, o + m,. V,

. Whna L,

_ e.~

i a

c, M eLN k~hr) U 6CO t/nn x L 1) S A S Y b la b h b

)-

NNA I T ihAws

$c[

r!A N_8ls'] Q '

U r

'%t (M%

a,. - ~,

1 A nw ')?L e

C Wao %-

L M L L 'C GS ',; W G r &

Z rs a e 4 K ~

o cati ts. ' ! Ara Af '.

WNN.2.s A -

eQ3 )l A a.udrl 0 E' Lun Ql V2M%%kiu' K201131.& F i % a fi & W Plh #v>J #.

9 en c e7 s >sa Luv te s

(.

N Nf t.ill_

/V i./ A l f. T Sri AJoll U

.i o.

m., n s A_.

6+ z.

L, o.f

We the-undersigned, believe that Northeast Utilities should not be the selector of the independent verification team on whose approval the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has mandated as a necessary step prior to the start up of the Millstone Units. As residents of the localities which adjoin the Millstone Power Station, we seriously question the independence of any group which is selected and paid for by the same utility on whom they are supposed to be performing an objective assessment and evaluation. We urge the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to rescind this decision and remove Northeast Utilities from any involvement in the selection of the start up verification team.

Name Address

$d/L Ywfm

/E'O (G reo2' /\\/&Ab l00 (O MS,' C Y

~ 'mhoxs

7ML 47T Ainsan>,5, dw

'n G2.ti,.. ; \\

Amdaa:3x (f h$wid)'nlYllGliW <,

I d' l' u, n*

ll' I J,?$H}5l</s' (? Y

_ f t'lN th} A /,

O iAl%htyI

$1 ll'O

/Y/I(Y1'An'('/'

C ~/

f' aus. y p,

//

. n-i...

~

>X%<4Al m Hv~Ci&( L(bk la Ill, o a fi [$ 4 < T*

%ra ' t y' c

^

M L4nnum

, av E I un, n e, s -r% S4usn/f'a SE fonEoo+1 dwd] }'A/]/M CdWf. j

~YS \\Intwb 4 BasW 'AveE u/K4 ctoffs Tsr IL <f.

c L Mf N

W8Ga 0 % e.

G $ L ile Idi'a, ' 1 1 s,g-,

()

7//, H < n. f N L h w u iu n,a s <

M Au hbtcd d

~

Ici Araute h W.# arf [cecl CTCto f 07 L'We i r #1kd (9.

_, da cr cO 17 AW.TL

'?r, u;et J1e a & J A) C1//wwi//. CV 0Go t L uV

' LS-lw Y? 9 6n o rc <~ ) N (lz l,-l. m N s l'& Gfc 0 1; (Q j f.x.2

~

T

s K LZhw (/

use Jea wnw insa er owen Qwtv L.ty n (

45 M rd, sr, ns.trru5 t.7 esiai "h0&M MhtM\\r N Lf Hav n es Pcl ill,$tlEl C T d 6 ll 7 fi 6)h' i AM /D, D,20AD EA' QK, <* r e1; o/6, Nio/Acc AcSelUO Y

Ydc J2VGiipyst) r F7 GDJ/JH f5 990% JAcoc,t'7~ &Yx2iG W fRff/W1662 IMWrMRnd

% %4/Shed New H.Esq CTOwtr

(/ K M Ayooscssawnotn MdB, CL 06aot

$I.Mtn% YhU QG G-l0oL O. & & NLNh4 M A/O]

AA&bAix m aesD A{/. Dhwn

,,Y wXe 43irv %EiwLa J 3 2 c xW D & Dro,r'<fel ('T cco WO 2 ac,nnL b 1Ju.. t c n u. c _ % n i c.?

ww a v

9

We the undersigned, believe that Northeast Utilities should not be the selector of the independent verification team on whose approval the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has mandated as a necessary step prior to the start up of the Millstone Units. As residents of the localities which adjoin the Millstone Power Station, we seriously question the independence of any group which is selected and paid for by the same utility on whom they are supposed to be performing an objective assessment and evaluation. We urge the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to rescind this decision and remove Northeast Utilities from any involvement in the selection of the start up verification team.

Name Address 3L. R (...

A u P. K' m 2v'+ O m,4 m &<v L, 4 GA n%) toL,JALs :t3Rhwcd4 A'% 2K # d b As I

blurL G-a E d L U G..,' 4 t-at L f a 'c

~

R. Ci v t a c_.a /t.i

/3 W~ Aa, Gm nurq 2

fami.

/ 3 Akofu,n El /% Jugl/<f(G

LM m. Lh>

,c o U m L la,fl6.. M

M>&

Jo Du MKL /4

'lloOL ?)Am Lis@ized

'r1\\ C6u,m,1 Ow ILJ Mdew O( o632o L MLL ic4 Wu P2

& n c'r et, us

//V1a run l'Laithiff/-Toidat~

5-IQ T&.uoMrn/c TA. 24rnua&CT063

'O m bt RIair-Om RioomimdddRd. Qusku IKlI ('$ Ob376

.D.k

.O i; 1.*D**" n TAIad-,, hir let% % L t.h1/ uT DI T75 MWIWC&M*"XM(UGW hk4rt,BT43 'a 6 fau-ea/TaL st.,

a s a m -fs s i e 7. r w m s e o.

LA ted.4 Ste

!29 A @ae M e__ % 3 b d4w.OV39-o ifl,u, h As a.&aMY

&5 ktLwix M An

!,1 X

& b s n o Nhi H.ufthisW 8' % K & 5 2 Aa, At < L.

GL-

o>as ptn Llm Af j>t&M &

iLL eE SA h o 0thA a n /

/2h[$wid [ht LII- &f AabW)J!//n 13A S n d Ow<

O l-W

[W b$.bA=J kN Meank&n.. N w 5 ', L O r.

Id,*AAh lTL (%eera,=rr me 51rs vonTs.owrs c.J~ tw 3%C __

0 5%

n 1 % & A.,>4rs, $ A 1 (kh W t'Y n &TeD bbb bn bdALb l dl ktDOoh k\\# Nb (r b_453ri

.IM% M.A Mn u tu. m n a, A c+.os u r O c h u s e> d 9 A C d. < M N I. A b (c 3U Mo _ N I / Y a herC

\\\\

1.la J NN (o 3 f 4M RJ.

fl',A c't M r fr ~

t W ^T t l G L k 0 1/ c > b

/6 3 l cta}lute / //

((r$t* (7 A i,, =l TS~

1kew FA r-u'h e

% P o'c h / O s C e c d e n m

g g

k i

We the undersigned, believe that Northeast Utilities should not be the selector of the independent verification team on whose approval the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has mandated as a necessary step prior to the start up of the Millstone Units. As residents of the localities which adjoin the Millstose Power Station, we seriously question the independence of any i

group which is selected and paid for by the same utility on whom they are supposed to be performing an objective assessment and evaluation. We urge the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to rescind this decision and remove Northeast Utilities from any involvement in the selection of the start up

)

verification team.

Name Address i

2rram Kak.o mest Muna tt twi, h auk > tJh. er nt3 7r i

4M w &nra nr thw Eza b.%Wanerne' c7 c.firj u

c h'eu,C Em tws hWh -. de bM*

ST5fitd tE beroen-tuonet 32 (mdww TM BW Cr 044'2,4 kwim ba-CA.~

LXctAm T. Cetetw >nsawn tLe wcmertMzo-se(o

\\

~

O ('Lai,1n Chm,;2L.Lus &4 %,mn.,a 24 5%am & M39P

/% huw '

.fAdA nbw-S Us AEH Psn Ab CLT*

d G ulL.cd UC N CE Cb5 (fUm %thn Toan Wa heb 9 %+u c2 a,

'1]w4 C6 H n

f n /-.A w'ee r-Gc /cH, ('

~

/dS W'ih

>1alurkdb.L&

1.1 An ex Ps'u',dod ia Fihha<*s View De man k cr " *'=

ON$68arr72n' AN& On 34 &l' $*/.

da 4~ CY cck

}Ud/ '

'R'l i r b i da~' to,

f& a,

%a LA e, c 3 u J

~~%

~

v (G ^tj)h,o a

a.

~

'Q Yd M 22 & dd M iLL.% HA IVLeN. M Msinh o W hR. WA7G M cWl] '

/S,w/ WWsf b 0.ea h 't?-u.e/tM NJA 0W'*NW

'.tdu E. M A'h Wsaw

%; A/- /d (d.kl.~

Ac.373 MWE Kkh %Aw,M SM&

W1 M w e aA o tF o u v5

%ws A SicG b ie ~AP/ 0EE O9ofD Men d 29 A H ott '> r JA. %2n,"

in % 2mx rd C,uth iM (/re2c

~

nd t'K+

~ 7%w&

% e u:h cf.naxi.s elm Kf

~

'7 'D id %d

(~)siAAw[f/ di e617<

A (C G - m n >cs &

L < Mxu G cFe W

no m,o ed Lck c7 eme

. / $. ~ # 7 J L e WO,,)if /dE 5 2 '7W.Sl.

Il}sn k. C 7 M32D 21)))) Mitb-kYu h+2 202.Y(cslon Attw N Ec\\hr.CT Du330

/Mfl%uJsA

'J3 boh M.

00.k. FY. 06 4 M IDLd]K B &,,6nt2d raakoc/El( &k uc'7demL M hmyV

'#AL/A/AW /</ Lhd2 ff(L rhe Al# osf M b s 17A B &(& \\ W % 3 J C h vn f A LL %

tti

We the undersigned, believe that Northeast Utilities should not be the selector of the independent vedfication team on whose approval the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has mandated as a necessary step prior to the start up of the Millstone Units. As residents of the localities which adjoin the Millstone Power Station, we seriously question the independence of any group which is selected and paid for by the same utility on whom they are supposed to be performing an objective assessment and evaluation. We urge the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to rescind this decision and remove Northeast Utilities from any involvement in the selection of the start up verification team.

Name Address 4

Ader 7secav 9bs/96 A0nn o 7

/ ).r A A G d u s t :

,M AAAL M'

'_s'/_ff.h d4 A ~a4Lh dA4.l AL _nWnen 91 i St oe e m,,-:, d.i w :cv

/ & X//, 7 ~

4 //s/cl(c e/c7,larAad s4.ert auslGc ma

~

~ '

('%RJilbuw)

Q& &A~

't /I3 / #

3 Gduou M Sc/r/c/01

(%c d?% L (4lboQfAE 4-n 'h 4I MAPM M1%Sxh&tTVd.Q

'k& L L I O/n 19&

Wi-- AirMA s 2+a MJAl " 'Di\\192 i 9 i.o sNe21sk?T Ak tc, h-f1bor.3 WW YVff{l ?d

/W" (C&(f/cl I bleu. rT cg 2if*I '

U%x. (1_ AhrmL

't I2-9h Icc Coinrvi Ares..w m. A

% /kYa</1 hot Tr 6atubid **

C0ilnL VERlWPt 4 4ti e WC%P %

Mt rInt v'ilut/sf -

~

1%Li %

n < % d ;,i,j & w ! %./.

i Lg 6. rps, K - ~ ~

<ii; u -

My hrik' ZvTAkdLS

// !9[,

h bdWdub' k

C47 Ch efe; A dam cr/ts'/v6 66 haL9f-sJ / ATTjh,

'm,L 2 bx1,d~~~'

9k! rs

~

V&rr J M ww

/

bSi ELdAA.

Q ll s/ti4 1g&fcocyMuir_ %(nfield d(

j 6-M 13-h 9 //3/%

/.,% I.. w J i -, xfL t-u.1 C T. l

%Mhf L

'Ql(3L Cl(o NO CVLTm ad AMFGnkCrg (7%KTr -La.,

9li aloi, a<; u. x% Afd /d -nH C i

"l 9 MU fik f'Ohl/1 QII-5)Gla LDLD (W(VO ENTM R W)h~O w d ' --. 4 W L L a W ) ?s ' ci&

L no2wn ut Cgm

/

n wvi Mn (Wc

( l '/t h f 7t ?

M<eH('it.(H Rf29

-thl.tA m 9'n-M amo n av.tL-ik;crws-hDEW s

% l'-9 6 M%es.b ' Post-E h

~od W (L)Lw3ttt-M -Qb M bs httbH AA. Mku hEU081

%N (Mh.

Oli31%

7 brb7 ca e L t40B2_o bM rw 2: LM't 4/i >/%

s't ct rm De os c u t c-

j We the undersigned, believe that Northeast Utilities should not be the selector of the independent verification team on whose approval the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has mandated as a necessary step prior to the start up of the Millstone Units. As residents of the localities which adjoin the Millstone Power Station, we seriously question the independence of any group which is selected and paid for by the same utility on whom they are supposed to be performing an objective assessment and evaluation. We urge

+

the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to rescind this decision and remove Northeast Utilities from any involvement in the selection of the start up verification team.

Name Address

%{1LL2Am DE ESSES 9 inag ST WA702.F02a, CT

%e cwwcmc qH c,-e u ~ u n %rc a n cn 4<emem Lubox es wer'iaoaa % xmand cr dAsli b\\ ec/\\

9

/'~unc6 D[ LJ#rO2tMo C T j

!-lA

v s Y Q AcgEnJr\\vtx I S Y Yo u m N r $ ~r G m. rv + < >

In wh kAh b e

%w.bd a{tW cwm%

'& h.L i i, a+9

~'

Dwno'1YJu/4hu iT Cn,J dawJMillwatcf <Ha n !

L AfMw. I J c' ln L iLa L Cear c7 fB F Alb &

m s2crsniosen

~

(L-,J /d MJM,L,i;J G/

' AU ~ ///'b

/r/W RsL/ndiiJ b uitMrz9;y k 5' fin hf A A V // H F Af d k v) J 'G u < M 4// WA.N Oti/tJ Ia41 At,n &

~

$f an f9L) nun 9 - \\ ~6 *&

ilsl 6tYrtLhm in. Aforevich Cf P&hh\\rd(M Cl-B-%

1ktl Drbrel tcb Pd.(1hn5WCE

'N n % YdE I ~ 8 3 ~ i (e trO bytccnd CAf CJtFt i C htQD ($

8/n st u

$-/.24 C 9S' L Eu4- %\\Ve

<s L au b ch w d u 4 -%Ctt n W Qxr o A CA CoM%c C's CALdi~h,b\\llho El deb MSWecD All Pd UMMSM((C(',

e - -l-/w be w ~

O-/3 h

.34 u;//L, / si s, n. i d/

/h L z XL L 1 - < v rc:

h t la<x a L,a.s a r-

[f6d//r d l A fcsstb-Y - /34G

'1 Clm 19vct Ale y w lc h C'{~,

.Off ~1/AuML/ W Q I2 9f M (~ rJoha 1 u A U t h\\

T lF ':P '3-T 6

@OlaL1 Ed.k '('J.

TN c, h Gl. A/,m 1hcy. 4pjj UDb d d_ 1 9-139I, Iu k nhRY b nAr%- >n.% (T4 manwk uwkativtv cwsn@

Tri%kb Ncinnfo(7 #1-/3- %

'M Ploec$te e J Ou/r_ '

b(chan /T o@C :

9l, hk

,h YI&

Gh-37kDsT Mysk p % c4

(

M gm u
L 9* w 44 gg 9/G/4 dO MSc b k
We the undersigned, believe that Northeast Utilities should not be the
~
selector of the independent verification team on whose approval the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has mandated as a necessary step prior to the start up of the Millstone Units. As residents of the localities which adjoin the l
I Millstone Power Station, we seriously question the independence of any group which is selected and paid for by the same utility on whom they are supposed to be perfonning an objective assessment and evaluation. We urge the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to rescind this decision and remove Northeast Utilities from any involvement in the selection of the start up verification team.
Name Address Oda M Alma At twa%es, es. obv5 m /D%
a tra/L M MLL/ & orxd5 L01%
WA v
rz atmdei
. case /cr was'
\\Ww%h J n PaNo ad, t odeL/
cr 0(o @j vl&L (L Yd6 k
a udtulf ~~.ilsd&A^n.os3w
%>hs1dLL a f d d
/ ski ex;n.uc
/
MRVkab
~
/TdM4#
AAAP of nW
' OfkL1 W'e cussee rueva umo
% % d'. #
b sA W d stW x exov 3
's,?d nh '
9, n; i e T i%h n s.
<7
<< n v'
-Peo
-s wa a
< u n a> v m a s r.7 o Gibrorst? cr ogy Y
Sl Y A.
Tr & L J 4$ !% lin} &/
~ & gas,
% 4ee w c n %' 4 r n'ecwie.d CLT a c : c c 1
T WkS$.'
Mt ' ftGIMCO CC Mc61
(~~ rc4X' A ers L o p edf n lT#2 t1 W - TRjh c n%now "
l
oa KhM2 wt w to; N a Ac+n mi M%
m sal 1 i,, 1 L e r es1. 2 <. b w C&oL
.L% L h o a JX hMlW A rrrJ6%
" QuW Id k Sw Mww d, ca 063Ds
~
~ i t~'.it Tr.
LJ Jefuhiw cr
(>(,fI(.
Min /dwc-eck 1
3d thw karett:
G o 1.~ S+
(kes(% :a.; & A Btfri Albu; c,7 Onnkchstw rni.
mom (;'an '< ct cr svA o sv ee Bev
$ e wer~L ex n,w;u, e
/,t h b It H -
A I:fnn ly,
) icd iifts
('/
i'(',VD -
M10Lb iy M EUJILcon nbsf1 L M Gomma w Am % %sk -
n t, o4n
'danL kb X
%%)rJ u-x mr h GW o lo W )
J1dnv~
% u k / W M elcx u Ti r OG z % t yA.f21Li,L,*
n Ma c kn, >, e LA
~
(k, a 5
J l
We the undersigned, believe that Northeast Utilities should not be the selector of the independent verification team on whose approval the Nuclear j
Regulatory Commission he mandated as a necessary step prior to the start up of the Millstone Units. As residents of the localities which adjoin the Millstone Power Station, we seriously question the independence of any group which is selected and paid for by the same utility on whom they are supposed to be performing an objective assessment and evaluation. We urge the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to rescind this decision and remove Northeast Utilities from any involvement in the selection of the start up verification team.
Nam Address h a-s-a, m hT
~
s: A/n
& Jk-i
%,.d.,. f X..,[
's/ i. j,'. c #.
~
l,.
(,',
.1.
f_. N L-tb e />
l' h M M\\ i ad N aa CD D. S h t!'-
/, cod 6/ b 0'$$//YdWf 173 -Ri&YAsstf'AV2.
1TAElic.6
~
$A/A S~
llc LL r.): h(\\ c.
,4 m dn u : u. n w <1 T 7
~
']d!M -
Awhc h d#
'Nu SNu '
i O 79 Aiolwre H fb
/'L An in b cT
~
0%)ll.% fa) G 3 kun da /1 Rd Pnsfun cn A,
'dLa-rs.An L &n,w tak
\\
00YZ9t ~/te&&*L
// w4t&[c)&. '
Ot41&n140 dT
% G4L.
n L da td a%or l'7~
'Y ML iw+
DYl(dLLaa k un Ntu)Wdh CrMhad%
M O M:<va Ann < tus &
'4 %
4 CWh Wnon acame ExteG c + %%
~
K/Pe KJMKL A(LwL KLLLw 'c1.
9/npys 11 #llh ifY1HW
/G %1PL. ' HWid (T MM%,
B Wdi 'IC 7/> %,
-1,. DX4Wd&/vb DfL_wWMhih 9 & LZ'Kf H F M d d A,/
'J-refffY '
,s-426'#Aa'm 9dZMd7v c7marz g
/2 Dis
., s ui.-
nM~ W s s w c-vi
'J
' Lc) M/mnb 4mA% md Jfum Afk n,MI m'%u J,4// 8 ~Maca es'
'cv e/AEo 7&!
(1[AEhA
~2ha % W (mm
oduD g'
d L:.
A L ;/ f % {J
1 L % &a M M J N cvsrcs-
9 irtyg :
or o
p<
~..
We the undersigned. believe that Northeast Utilities should not be the selector of the independent verification team.on whose approval the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has mandated as a necessary step prior to the start up of the Millstone Units. As residents of the localities which adjoin the Millstone Power Station, we seriously question the independence of any group which is selected and paid for by the same utility on whom they are supposed to be p'erforming an objective assessment and evaluation. We urge the Nuclear Regu15Ioiy~ Commission to rescind this decision and remove Northeast Utilities from any involvement in the selection of the start up verification team.
Address Name j
C-M Y
,'c ' b ists rh%
zuy,,r w c w v. Juu.
w w '
i.
/4Qy ifGA 7 Ocza.<Uhm.
-v
'H La 3,WX w
/2 2Mi~ Lid M&c ie E rm r m w
~2 'm L.
% wn,ia %1x' LJ,u,
>h'.,, /] (h T<
6,'c a <l' 9 0, A
( T lishu 1: [l he vx! Y n m' a
.IkbGrr Jin ll'1!Je'tJ I'l
?l u b vl W i IU! 10i MI K E.
I'1/ I!nra:
}bzd L & #
C
$l ',l/ ! 3 llH I de iW
'o Nn
~ ~ k,
th,, fb, a
).f Nuj kNu,Sje)
/ !!', 'S u s ) A $ 7'/N' o d sc 4 1' W A !*l' f f ; u '
%, %Lt =
QI Liw %
Mthd Pa <,
s'nde K w ni h
..r
_ s rf,,,1 n iMd
'!t
// cu I.
A /<u,u -
.W.Jihr?t' AMW{Gh&W%:
i ust hand 9' ~'is J'~
f,,; W ;p.sii n / ~
4t 7, f e ).
.. \\ l,, n-.1 r), Q/ Si a
~.
hec.* 'wsM L,!r. ;va W @%
j)?g 2 <.
f D'
s rp
./
/ n u ~<d}L ii
$ thi, i ] Oiri
+. 3 y'b,u, y u + < s N
s : ?-
L.
%,4 (N ut C, d J to cs. % M.
L]2 (l% a_ Db0L*)b3
_ h ~$ l T U '. ' V.'
j,L
,( {'I~f I \\!O O,.' th W..
i t
5 i'
A y it ry e I'n ' H^) != I' o i m '
5 ~,
V n, Dr & H JMn N>le u1.trN Y3 t~b 9 0 'u E ( 1 Cd Y) 5
'-f'
< { (D.'.
l,JS.
in 9
y
< G,, k R-> Zi p< w !y%, a.'W
, J h j, r s,4,, ~
(
ri r-'6 f[">
NE :.an, e r NJ ( Pel E U e, n" C T MeE$
N[y k I
'y % t y u. A>, 7,-///a O ' '. ': M!w $+' 9 'Mh f4 W7
.* !5cel f L ' Tin.
t o \\d " '
' G,, jf, AL l' ~
m i&L. %,s
\\bcw3 si hadr
.CC<ir<lla A u." :In 5'Jno & &
W -wA ' ' ~
%. h%.,y(%
o u.,MI, ((
\\ % !//)
.1.
.s 3,.
l 1
We the undersigned, believe that Northeast Utilities should not be the selector of the independent verification team on whose approval the Nuclear f
N Regulatory Commission has mandated as a necessary step prior to the start up of the Millstone Units. As residents of the localities which adjoin the Millstone Power Station, we seriously question the independence of any group which is selected and paid for by the same utility on whom they are supposed to be performing an objective assessment and evaluation. We urge the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to rescind this decision and remove Northeast Utilities from any involvement in the selection of the start up verification team.
Name Address DRmsw 3r ?2eh h Qm se eyb k D lA wGit I M do S. M,, M ef--
141 A i d,,/ L e Oi h
'f
/Po%L mA 1 M' #LLL&ibt. 4A SJ4w2at <
ir 9 atA,a / n u aA 2.
Wm \\Tcn nwdb~
(V
\\
%C-n w I C ' < f, f
f hw YUkw'GMk &,
mnex /2J' 4 2
/%d't4JrO &dE ii /
) i/'
(I % ',
%,u w
/ 2 s m / W F 7 h ' it/2,i f, p~ 1 i
vsWFID G W M K s<-
e W u m b A v' M 7kka12
LL' M&M#2 c7 h6=Ms,,L/
/i L edaAd.X X B A1 L R 42 U 'lT.
1 Y FM-b tz&
C-!
"~
~'
is 4 4 4c M S W.'
,+tAJ &
st E. R h emnsa+ d 4 W FD feu a%( M &M 75 4 4' 4/1 1
/
/M1AE P L f &&r, ff n uamew ~,'D/< /n.v c-n wy
.h~ L NDeO(eL.4au\\M CA CL"4d
'Z(skT if o
7 Mhsa disih RAb
~
K JLM Mlu-h,
ios2,,.alfn>Li+Lnu.ekh' 9 fflid W A r m Mik1/nd 27di't'C,
~'Y
"t M9Wirusu o
kran t?nhed ILlua%'
' nM A.A> '&A y t%6%uIs-
/
T V M A h / I, x ila c-mdk nni a.
(5fkad ^%w n's /% e hooA, /[Al,Ji v f
L X
,X L AkL
~,~1
\\nW.
72D M_in ma1LA4 1AML,2-7
.,'MI
1 We the undersigned, beheve that Northeast Utilities should not be the sciector of the independent verification team on whose approval the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has mandated as a necessay step prior to the start up of the Millstone Units. As residents of the localities which adjoin the Millstone Power Station, we seriously question the independence of any group which is selected and paid for by the same utility on whom they are supposed to be performing an objective assessment and evaluation. We urge the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to rescind this decision and remove Northeast Utilities from any involvement in the selection of the start up verification team.
Name Address O
//
s S.
A v> r' A AA JYiGo") N C.
e Q>i m
.D 4 h 4 m
( L & m m t L. % t; m W
9 3. CV-3 nc,w n kr. cm bui bith 1
' F'
( bM 4 l'). h ' PM F:-/1 f w,n e
6&, &_ &))f g K Q_a n--t o_
' Em L&
vr s d (L-.J h 43d
fin'n %) % l
c. a,e, n i+! e,, m. L c a c
.,.j
]Y$
Ae..
m ~
WN _
kf i&
B,.me; &
x~
%<v,<
cz F
dackD dubbi m ehemen.B sc
' &teact BJM 2Lt_.
& Lkt LuRL ii,, A6
& W L.n % 3 &. m a c, AL c e:d :. D M ' + ~
'I v:
. wb I a,t.ekil dic, ; > (c I; A. 4 rii e e c..
\\
') u ov &.
, t 3.c hrt-8 J', & WJ.Ac. t, h,,, re:
< jar
. cDCd, j ^
7 S' r 'N*e.. I$
?: n (-
t
~
A M~* 4.V
.p/ 1 _ I A'-f h 2-.-Y% 7$.
n k<<--
}i Ui
^ c,. ' l.. ~ u j,
[.. s. l... '..
.,( u L >~ a -
w>
W EC/N IC 2+c<cr,C A b _.. an
/l T_/dd rL
' so es 2./
W Ot TW i
riu m % AQ 4wmn W
&2x v%
b hhYD
(!9 $ N % Q b.. YLOW Dl03.55 j
L rrh A W i vi o..,
w w o r d n u. :
a.
ibhA'iw riJW%J:
I
( W r n i
=-l
\\, ? Si r et.'
(C M?
.,/
.s?
a,_ Ic
^
'*i o
S Yt V.,1.
in c _2 I
bv N \\ h_A. lL
?
A$.f-4 / A
)\\ l/ ' ' ' -
fA'IL/N1(A_
/
I f'? /Pl i M h. I, It, N k'7..
] 'N
/ l l'jj v.Y, J[ <> pcfr.,
(Y; i ~
fu H t
c.v' <
N
,,uG,
,n
/
i k, i
w i
u w
A
l We the pndersigned believe that Northeast Utilities should not be the selector of thd independent verification team on whose approval the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has mandated as a necessary step prior to the start up of the Millstone Units. As residents of the localities which adjoin the Millstone Power Station, we seriously question the independence of any group which is selected and paid for by the same utility on whom they are supposed to be performing an objective assessment and evaluation. We urge the Nuclear Regulatory Columission to rescind this decision and remove Northeast Utilities from any involvement in the selection of the start up verification team.
Name Address YSYub J2 W h &
!O&D l"-f, <3 Q M' auw $5h NG 086 I3 8 at HPr Rd nl wer a_.
( h Cb fQ j
8ln E'
///O'$-L 2 *-./ N / A'e s s O n bd'et /,n i, W a fis Mwt%)n 'Io m r4N1 o (_ _ Ce $v(
rW A 11 0h /1l)-
9 bs b b A Ltd, h $MU AflW), Wd hY 3sL 1%
i M X ~Ed R & h, ' & 2 n $y '
-%%a
~ n%a%k cr n a
' %L:
L.Y
( --( c_n j \\
ch 2." whlh.F'-
cy9 f - l$
. -,N l'..,_ f
.A. /
. r* y /
, f'~
/t
/
_,i p& - g u,1 $ 5 : '. t.
.O' 1'44 f f W L/ $ Y, f)s A /\\l'M.'
I
? ', C s k
ln I,, n.
h D% tad
v.. p }n y pp., y'. w c a, y.
/A4a AG hA/ 1 Ad& /Wizt>
M//bJMUb7 n
YLMfl c 4_G A.-XZ ho D :RJ 4,dItr e n)
~ M Rb i A a~c.
'n. ' m e i '-s' c r. au iss (M >k k Pd /;d/ l - et c/6 sv)
,,,142 M
~
~
Lxmma L k-4~e er oc.za A%A hose cMAdiHYlerna MMza s
M44'Lhe xmKm//O ML,. er oz m K OL M ivi M as ri.LJni a ovas
/f b k L K &
Io bule ru, L b& CT ou.2c llu;AJ $9M%th 7Y rdu..< A L
/usc. on ed os.nd
~ M xh 3< C2..,
WA M_lEN m
'b kA lkr W/-
y n t.w.., a 7,,, m
~dy/eaw v cm nm m YJ4L AAn?
4
.JLl/t-tZ u vt>
E t-unle a t E s 's b b A (t M W
(,,hded C-n 0 MJ b
0
/1 f
(
% +;n t k u ~ 7
m ' % et i A
&l, W ' o w c
, M ' $ 4 '/' m
/
. du O l'& Ch 065b0 h
.2 2 - SAPL4 & /l/iGnh'r, CT$63JJ
)
i 1
\\
We the undersigned, believe that Northeast Utilities should not be the selector of the independent verification team on whose approval the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has mandated as a necessary step prior to the start up of the Millstone Units. As residents of the localities which adjoin the
. Millstone Power Station, we seriously question the independence of any group which is selected and paid for by the same utility on whom they are supposed to be performing an objective assessment and evaluation. We urge-the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to rescind this decision and remove Northeast Utilities from any involvement in the selection of the start up verification team.
Name Address
,f
/
Afs n
a < r i,. u.
gw m x,:. k pCuis&s~
ara'iin zw Ac VHsr-t%q H. E. % s e m
/ n % +<4 v tt,a m F / +p nn f<it/ Aw.rli 2mtwardti n cm,% u aT~a+H f&$ 't?.'//n &#(
l A Wc/ L' M:l df~ A/I A// //i < -l
~
l'Y&<
Yh 2'h(al UNH-lS, f k l'Y.
I-
..W/a N, m,/
is ibw3 w h mte (t
&/'u's m. i,.4.x_ ~
Cr d 1 1 f f' D i 2,
3 d __1 h l / 2 /t Cd
/'Mrwa\\'
[.MO i L ii )
f~ //, e.# i d'
> < < -l t. n o - ~
N / lt JA s <.l
'/ '
b tu lae NicitOf ~ i s. k I*T e i=:s u e 'A
}L: u Cl G lh, rh! / ' O,,,.
", t' L*,.h,
i.,,., { / _w //'
/&fdL}'
'd.Suri-i
'/ f./OM/;YLb -4We sc 4C}L j.; Wris;-/sF U r'&w.r:b c W
/L, dul 2 ::<:,g
? r?.
n.a -,
D /) l l, L.?
L
/
[(l?rnu-/13/4 3/ /sa 6t
/.
b) ]f' A d A_ WE
'i' 61 rll // Wis: 78) /Y.
/' % A d it ke% %
R i l H 2
) X&)nc/w/N Cf Weir ~)/f'(,
RMwu t" l !%&
. :e si,in.,a N A6 'wm W.
niemd unb a (n h M cut m d di/.A v XL A f Shllu 2 cJ.eJ/ < < <w Q <rd-Aw &. 'I WWog. '
~
m s..
whys /,.w,: 5 3 e
I a w /ci
.3(' l'i < /..
'l C/ n A di m 7lc'<A<
Y 0 0 l ' Y dlV /< '
uL
/
br/i ir-L s' tcr',
v 7.v s y g o,,a w f.7 w e,-%, n
]Ab'td', A & b w *Jr~z I9cd'cxht.av k' N.c4,L, G4. c &Jc /
~
4 o F 55!
lb/ Jln d J%~ L L,.,iU 'Al.an}ie c
EidtO %m
'Is tw ye sT'IU
,4*c o L, % ?
We the undersigned, believe that Northeast Utilities should not be the selector of the independent verification team on whose approval the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has mandated as a necessary step prior to the start up of the Millstone Units. As residents of the localities which adjoin the Millstone Power Station, we seriously question the independence of any group which is selected and paid for by the same utility on whom they are supposed to be performing an objective assessment and evaluation. We urge the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to rescind this decision and remove Northeast Utilities from any involvement in the selection of the start up verification team.
Address Name N ' h / w ~'
f Df u
vasu k lL Y N A)se,1,'
A} Y A a -M. D
$/l he%[
% 2a' cw.
.' / e N j Im,m y lti ll. t,/
AAK X
. t Estatm IIdnT viaik % d,(,,n n.
NW AY H h /At*' D C- !
T~
L.<.fL h/ k WnGGd
%~<
c2 4
/v,- ~ n c cr d i - /.
I l rLo < L-Lt., rh c
( ' T~
@&Eks Pma
%: a, w
i sk13 7$ e cV Y +$
A4&M'MwSs w x = w, m -c 6 i oMnad 6.' R3rd1
%+ 4 uArL c7 8o ; V +1N e cn
_ _ _@v to mn e x
/17EA/Z/W R Al l. -
GA cro/v 21 ni 6,
/L. + rm(b
/is 2~:Mi fl% Iw>nJ/
Males L,.An c7 k 1/
Y
$/
ctM1442 t' llAAl
$/l
<-160%PLimJ/
si14 w a l/lw elt K% br ecr((
M
'9Rik c aL%
th waL 1%. 7/,LL: u. 06 357 r
%a Chener Hs1.ve,-cr k et>
G 111 A e.c s wr&x Y T rl', w lA. /tv Dr' Pt/ Tv I = !?
W. On w#. IMuil p2o MLo x~
l
^
l 1
We the undersigned, believe that Northeast Utilities should not be the l
selector of the independent verification team on whose approval the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has mandated as a necessary step prior to the start up of the Millstone Units. As residents of the localities which adjoin the Millstone Power Station, we seriously question the independence of any l
group which is selected and paid for by the same utility on whom they are supposed to be performing an objective assessment and evaluation. We urge the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to rescind this decision and remove l
Northeast Utilities from any involvement in the selection of the start up l
verification team.
Name Address
'_ 'A 'l i 53
+'
L' 21 k AL T O L t.)a %awca w & ???xw e,.,- n
'~
C
( ',,,,,
, % _c/
~,
t' & %$2
'2/ 'h< Y 0- M WSk W d/.5_i?0f
n % 4:,oM
%A, sar1
~#
% f 6 E,6 v d U
/,a K & a i f % W V. h v ( ) K o u Y f l SiL.rt U-RD c a
s. a
~
_o
% L) <.a :,.. ~
i.l n n. nm 3i v'wm o._yr -
( ' & ' bh,e :
' Ai < D; ',':6
%f c,,u i
' 7'.
- Q % ~.'.
' f-
/! i. wV/
~ ] MN. hs n,. <, ~
6' 2
' ' ' ib '.A
' ' I~
.' '.. : :.', '. W C I' i ? "-
A]W,,, : v n',, N
'r G
nM x~
~
U-t' Lc
- 1' A_1 dl! l?
,c r.
n,,.,
A, r, f s,w u, g i
,,, Je a
/
, 7,.2 s
.. vi, _ p i
/
~+
~
(>,
.6
.Ka
. T o o mT (v - m
,, ' : ' _1. n,. r
.m e x' N, a_ < <
l d-J "~
t ee v_
hu i l
,)
k
/
4
.f_*
c?A
(. -l
)I; t it f*_Vn's'%'
t t
r";
t ?
$ fad S& &L
~*' I N WtI SI llLu h 07/N3Yl
-Mkds C,1 0
2 LliA II & 751N. - (V. 8 'Sd
/
.m
\\,
E i
We the undersigned, believe that Northeast Utilities should not be the selector of the independent verification team on whose approval the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has mandated as a necessary step prior to the start
)
up of the Millstone Units. As residents of the localities which adjoin the j
MillstoSb Power Station, we seriously question the independence of any group which is selected and paid for by the same utility on whom they are l
l supposed to be performing an objective assessment and evaluation. We urge
[
the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to rescind this decision and remove Northeast Utilities from cny involvement in the selection of the start up verification team.
Name Address Ob8,,.bne
32. Reo_As %
K) d c d m l
..Litss__'irne<e.x_
W n cm e+
Mw
' / :,. -
T ',.
O s 1.
/-
t,.
i
/
i
'/."
'/+
'(
f i
,d 'fi.,,i.
_-- : /_, f,
,s, C,.r s,,d
=1.
i.L,.J
/,. :<
'i :w+
c v...e e
r. L a b
b.. ri.-
We. li.
% t-
c...,,. r 1
's.
/.,- a -
r h
s. A / i f/////;hy/ y SA' Ybl/W D.
T ' d at
t. An
%.,caN m, m
+/ / ' t, J h 7,
/
.o,,
i ic
1 *<':f' ( 'u,a ('ce < lyt &
4c'< l..b. 4 < -
l/f & I 4 ' 'y
, u f
s Ghi%h m/MJ h 6 64$ < r-
_4 l
/!//uw/A'Mb w/
5 7 0 fa'vvuw Sc'e 6,skn, c'.
3C A Rirr 51 L%n %
G I,reHTEAF~ fPM@\\ui;f G j
iMei)% %WM!f\\
' WhDVhizh'n 1
Cams sf
'hko lo> den C
'E n, 5 D Tw w n i u-
/ki f.'5%2i acia AwuMLu - Ha 'maih.,a'n
~
f,,,a d e f A s, A s,
' % fuhr nA'A%f' N (E
/7N I
%2J%a >
1 2,ci32 4 2 W Ywrx
^ d-La.k/,,so 19 N s w L. @, w w cr-k (1)f A~
_i a % u i R a 4, e n W W e 7 s
4
~
We the undersigned, believe that Northeast Utilities should not be the selector of the independera verification team on whose approval the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has mandated as a necessary step prior to the start up of the Millstone Units. As residents of the localities which adjoin the Millstone Power Station, we seriously question the independence of any group which is selected and paid for by the same utility on whom they are supposed to be performing an objective assessment and evaluation. We urge the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to rescind this decision and remove Northeast Utilities from any involvement in the selecdon of the start up verification team.
Address Name 3gg b ll'6 f6:
lO k W LL f
bur-i h~
6 44 prueAr Afv4E oca x "Ph M /
JJs&
" 4ws.r ww cn 8 Yd]1/1L WlNl$fa Qu4 lub N l ll C f QL:%/BHR -
,sWs d, n i, w M A d r m 72,/ j f
We the undersigned, believe that Northeast Utilities should not be the selector of the independent verification team on whose approval the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has mandated as a necessary step prior to the start up of the Millstone Units. As residents of the localities which adjoin the Millstone Power Station, we seriously question the independence of any group which is selected and paid for by the same utility on whom they are l
supposed to be performing an objective assessment and evaluation. We urge the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to rescind this decision and remove Northeast Utilities from any involvement in the selection of the start up verification team.
Name Address
/0 $0%usu LA.
0.d (Y &3W bt' Wh% au 9B Lakw,eJ H& Akaaki LT Cb367 "6w (f
lo R :s m-J (l
& I ' N < c.. A /\\
viu a 9u 2tecm tiv&d; fd. O lllll):
Oc>
P o tu (I n
( k rba q r ' Riw cus-a l4 IV,~de cf
% 3 M 4 w ;r ~
Y/,ma,,',-
1/ an i Kx -' : -ec
, y
~-
+
ViladuGfd kn ih-Jen ibirik,LefM,C%n j
(M Df L W l1 Yx L w U LOnd { cc 0(obtc5
% % 4 i.
4H FieldrM Cr (> fch&n ct uwi UC/f:L ll
/ /d lh i t
n !%,
S+
bw G c + m vi7
%d Ensr A?sw Sr, G r eu ci-cc57 E. BC2MZM 2 aw WNwW re -f Ara Sr. Ges a.er bz,3s; i
'Th~42/
fi'L tEEcm
u. u <, ha rac t%c Lw e C I o(o 5 u ll atal/' !LtAViv-h4 6m hv s v Etat to,vc U 'UV2 g bak (Y\\ P h ul aac M Ib A m Hus [ulrw (-, s e6%l A/sem,A, t1 ol26u
!? W / M Z8 0nees e-t AJ/Af4 -
// adu nt aufrLb Wary
% M G au tio fcru+ Q1 urni;% o cwc=
{ /HA-ven wtel& M rnnsyc
?A n
% A n ii e,s A $
QQ'INbo I)> oi>> [0i1 k lo m Of Ob t/c2 C a o 1.- a k. ~ 4 ; W w.i.c n o r. ; > >
kJ RM%, ~
n f
J We the undersigned, believe that Northeast Utilities should not be the selector of the independent verification team on whose approval the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has mandated as a necessary step prior to the start up of the Millstone Units. As residents of the localities which adjoin the Millstone Power Station, we seriously question the independence of any group which is selected and paid for by the same utility on whom they are supposed to be performing an objective assessment and evaluation. We urge the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to rescind this decision and remove Northeast Utilities from any involvement in the selection of the start up verification team.
Name Address V
V2 l BAlNA AV/, IIIbLfsir!J%,
t
< o % rd ere% MM;, e.(R..,
' 9 ),o u /L. WMf it WfJ 2%/, b W W be...-,--
--/
f.,mcine_rTVM7rr_i
.,,3 k,,, s W,J't ;!
--M u A d u.-
~
~
LO4/
-?
, Arf 8
,h'1/
< s.x _'? & ' k J N (
O// Y
=
5% %
M % w %
% LJ, S,, Ef
~,w /./ A L
/c -n-.> & /aw &
b f.. a_ I'. '
r?l1 N Ih*h r.'l [ $
/ti J o> G L u cTP
% ik /c 2 iwu,..& cr 0 f l'1-III4 K
> ? 9 Ci<r> u'T t %,-ti-c'? - (LJ'0
SN! $3b Y] AUb ~+bhI
('b $
'ir
,/WidW M % i L J W G d L,t d
dtt3TM/
/i/v A in 'r&W '
.- M 'Z >>/L M / ibcl..,av d C..
Wnuim,
'M ?W, Wmc
%we-hec 9piii n.% sn t u s k t w :'t : '
/ r_,f [F i i ' r,'
L
'<'gottl' VWCW.
/4 MA < O t.
b d.t l,,- e. u T h D ? !,_ n !, n {, n Anm Sd/
M --
.51 /{l,LN>-. utN b h ~'
HP an NMJ u', ~
'(
~) / / l'/2, t'
// IL<..
,.,. _ a u.
'R -. <d -.%.
5II:
~
Dn NA 7/ 4 ~, k A i fr,z2ft. 6,4' E?-
bhp'!E'2LCbda i i'OMC', Av2
\\@'JE v' r 69 5
.G) c
& mwMkAs w
s
~
.-),,.. ly'f* cg (( ~
_ Y::,. 'r'n, _, j' if,, / /(, f fm l C' <, J se h ') e( I, m e,,
A<<
/t / ('
+
I X.. f l' MO t....?
N.S N
[ ] ~8'L :
a s n ua 5,,a n
n.a u sn-a :
\\ \\ (t, w')
Y. rs I
'(
%,,, i */t I.,
.i
< \\
z. g m n ' (M -L.-,,; _.,
j
" V ), ;/ / if -) _,,
2,1,,
i
)
We the undersigned. believe that Northeast Utilities should not be the i
selector of the independent verification team on whose approval the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has mandated as a necessary step prior to the start i
up of the Millstone Units. As residents of the localities which adjoin the Millstone Power Station, we seriously question the independence of any group which is selected and paid for by the same utility on whom they are supposed to be performing an objective assessment and evaluation. We urge the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to rescind this decision and remove Northeast Utilities from any involvement in the selection of the start up i
verification team.
Name Address JcHW c,w ver tos carsrcefno xo ext t.wr er o t. s, s MC DM 10 M WO htP_-
&c ULA(, C.T Ct>3R R b kMm (It n1)tAk.
N144) b
, C.T ti d 8/A1}!W O'M S All A Ob3 D I
V i
i 4
I i
i 1
i
We the undersigned, believe that Northeast Utilities should not be the selector of the independent verification team on whose approval the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has mandated as a necessary step prior to the start up of the Millstone Units. As residents of the localities which adjoin the Millstone Power Station, we seriously question the independence of any group which is selected and paid for by the same utility on whom they are supposed to be performing an objective assessment and evaluation. We urge the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to rescind this decision and remove Northeast Utilities from any involvement in the selection of the start up verification team.
Name Address kH M
39'l Au > tlALL Sr 86 (UAVGAfcA D ch iM.] M, L s' f %
4 s%
A.1 ", 17 C ~
' M7 vi/'u
/ n c?
MJAu,-saf. sh#dnaPrr-f i mcZTCL ' sss'ML.accG Cctcxa/o ' Og 3 5 '
't%'sk Y hU m
h%2 TG
't>>fD ci annc CD.E%_L~ :
s m.
L una art h a w %.L ' hT M btA<G s$ fu s+ c.-
$5 A YS -o Y,<
,)) J
,/>;'.elv.,6 4x
.c w
=<, u m
_<.)
/z 11 ( cc.u
~t b,
R.L.-
u.ed I
D 6 i,A U'i, A a ~
i' Ur..s Av. 2
%.I Ib
'k b-b bl\\
, C, _ /f i, t.
/a.
6, 2 Of t
L lW W O
/0 0l,i r-m,n
, l' 'm. l, L.
N VIV iGuit Otted M nteuun w thN NL Uk. Ole T ZQ
-% "'M J
?'
s ::&.i O.M' ty L i,u ?
- %Q c 4 % thha
-7i < faowced Ps 9 % ML
'A s v
~ K. b%l'e44 K 2 t,/ t wZ,aN c:7 o c i 9 =a h
V a l a A ',, o Krst N KheIt W. Wv& cd C P e 6 >'/ d'
/t c i, /h t i 1 7, ai n n > w. = 's T <,e. -.irc' 3% n/
'iw,<'d Cf c
h m e,.s, C u.
?i ra s i a-i i s.->
c?
pu :. s tw o,
-ra
. Dlt rud h Ys ! n [x /
ll ) ' W,
.1, t, L i. I
'l Jh.
'Fq'W r _
f.f88ww
~

ML20132B232

Text

Navigation menu

Search