ML20132A674

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Technical Meeting Insp Repts 50-424/85-18 & 50-425/85-18 on 850501.Capability of Ultrasonic Exam Procedure & Equipment to Detect Flaws in Centrifugally Cast Stainless Steel Demonstrated
ML20132A674
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle  
Issue date: 05/07/1985
From: Blake J, Newsome R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20132A678 List:
References
50-424-85-18, 50-425-85-18, NUDOCS 8507230173
Download: ML20132A674 (2)


See also: IR 05000424/1985018

Text

. . _ .

. - -

__

,

.

-

.

.

'

[p no %

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

UNITED STATES

!

l

[3

REGloN 11

o

g

j

101 MARIETTA STREET, N.W.

't

ATLANTA, GEORGI A 30323

j-_.

( v \\ s ..... /

Report Nos.:

50-424/85-18 and 50-425/85-18

i

Licensee: Georgia Power Company

P. O. Box 4545

Atlanta, GA 30302

Docket Nos.:

50-424 and 50-425

License Nos.: CPPR-108 and CPPR-109

Facility Name:

Vogtle 1 and 2

Inspection Conducted: May 1, 1985

Inspector:

6d.

u%

5~- 4-gf

R.

Wso

Date Signed

Approved by.

7

.

J/ . Blake, Section Chief

Date Signed

in neering Branch

di ision of Reactor Safety

(

SUMMARY

Scope: On May 1,1985, a technical meeting was held with Georgia Power Company

(GPC) and Southern Company Services (SCS) representatives in the Region II Office

for the purpose of providing GPC an opportunity to demonstrate the capability of

their ultrasonic examination procedure and equipment to detect actual flaws and

artificial reflectors in Region II's Centrifugally Cast Stainless Steel (CCSS)

test specimens. GPC was successful in detecting the I.D. reflectors, including

cracks.

Region II's CCSS test specimens represented examination conditions

similar to those that GPC will experience during the examination of the Vogtle

l

facility stainless steel reactor coolant loop piping. Therefore, GPC's proce-

l

dure, and ultrasonic equipment have demonstrated conservative detection

capability for the preservice examination at the Vogtle facility.

i

l-

l

l

8507230173 850508

DR

ADOCK 0500

4

OO

._

,

*

-.-

,.

"

-

, ,

.

,Q

REPORT DETAILS

1.

Persons Contacted

s

Licensee Employee - Georgia Power Company (GPC)

J. A. Edwards, Senior Regulatory Specialist

Other Organization - Southern Company Services (SCS)

T. N. Epps, Manager, SCS Inspection, Testing and Engineering (ITE)

J. M. Davis, NDE Supervisor Level III, SCS

A. Maze, NDE Level III Senior Inspector, SCS

2.

Technical Issues Involved

GPC and SCS personnel identified in paragraph I above, visited the Region II

Office on May 1,1985, to demonstrate the capability of their ultrasonic

i

examination procedure and equipment to detect, locate, and size actual crack

flaws propagating from the pipe inside diameter in Centrifugally Cast

Stainless Steel (CCSS) using a refracted longitudinal wave transducer.

The

refracted longitudinal wave transducer currently is the only practical

(VA)

method of inspecting difficult-to penetrate weld volumes and most cast

>

stainless steels.

However, the refracted longitudinal wave mode suffers

significant mode conversion when interfacing with corner type reflectors

such as I.D. pipe cracks. Therefore, GPC wanted to test their procedure and

equipment detection capability prior to the start of their preservice

baseline examinations at the Vogtle Unit 1 facility.

Region II provided the CCSS specimens for the GPC performance demonstration

test.

All cracks and artificial reflectors were concealed so that the

licensee had no prior knowledge of their location. GPC used a Krautkramer-

Branson USL-38 instrument and dual 1 MHz by one inch trensducers.

The

transducers had lucite wedges ground to fit the contour of the reactor

coolant loop piping and were designed such that the ultrasonic sound beam

was focused at a specific metal path distance.

SCS performed the actual examination of the test specimen and Region II

personnel provided guidance and monitored the ultrasonic instrument calibra-

tion and subsequent crack detection techniques used by the participants.

After the participants had completed the examination of the weld sample, the

I.D. cracks were revealed to the licensee by-removing the masking material

and performing a liquid penetrant test on the sample.

3.

Meeting Conclusions

During the technical meeting at the Region II Office, GPC successfully

demonstrated the capability of their ultrasonic examination procedure and

[ ).

equipment to detect actual flaws in the volume subject to examination.

c

.

.

. _ .