ML20129H240

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests More Info to Evaluate Objections to Production of Util & Brown & Root Matl.Further Elaboration Will Help Determine Whether or Not to File Motion to Compel
ML20129H240
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 06/05/1985
From: Roisman A
TRIAL LAWYERS FOR PUBLIC JUSTICE, P.C.
To: Downey B
BISHOP, COOK, PURCELL & REYNOLDS
References
CON-#285-321 OL, NUDOCS 8506070523
Download: ML20129H240 (2)


Text

3c71

~'

TRIAL l AWYERS FOR PUBLic JUSTICE SUITE 611 c

cmrtus ucAt cuumnctas 2000 P STREET. NORTHWEST gg,'g, WASHINGTON. D.C. 20036 coma N Nrus m i

  • acetucaatwumf retsrotNT tact *t Yxt uT N m*a$c Eon" ARTHUR BRYANT estrH coTcHtTT MCt rtsslotNT {202)463 86QQ STAFF ATToaNtv wityAM A TalNL FINANetAL cMAlm

-.<a - ~~u uc =1- enensTnomen g3_gu/d(, o c. 3 c*=

cu cotso~ ucomoN:.uc"'" PROD. & LTTIL FAC.. _ - _ _ sA~oaA swerAno

/ ornet mA~aan ras 7 retssotNTs C'.= awm.D co'4Rt 5""""'"" UUd'O'Er

- s-STAFF ,

A m. Aa ,A~ m m y nas ,r a ncio.

'85 JE -6 Pl2 :09 annswo~s secuT* June 5, 1985 0FFitE OF ErttiA 00CKETING & SERVK 5 BRANCH Bruce Downey, Esquire Bishop, Liberman, Cook, Purcell & Reynolds 1200 17th Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20036 RE: Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station

Dear Bruce:

After reviewing the files you provided in response to my letter of April 16 I have decided we want to get a copy of all the materials provided. I propose we send it out to be copied and we will pay the copying bill directly. If this is agreeable please contact me and I will arrange for the copying service.

During my review of the documents I noticed that OAIOO27 is missing although it is referenced in 0022 & 0023 and apparently

! all three were processed at or close to the same time. Do you l know what happened to 00277 Also QAIOOl, 002, 007, and 0014 were not included. Am I correct in assuming that the reason for their exclusion is that nothing was added to those files since you last made disclosure to us? If not, please let me know the reason for their ommission.

With respect to your objections to production we need more information to evaluate the claim. Is it your position that material prepared by Brown and Root or TUGCO employees at direction of counsel but as part of the actual resolution of the f

8506070523 850605 PDR ADOCK 05000445 0 PDR A PROJECT OF THE CITIZENS LEGAL CUNIC $o

(

Bruce Downey, Esquire June 5, 1985 Page Two allegations is not producible? If not, what is the exact nature of the kind of material for which you are claiming privilege? A further elaboration of your position will help us determine whether or not to file a motion to compel.

Thank you for your courtesy in these matters.

Sincerely, f

Anthony Z. oisman Executive irector AZRadle .

cc: Service List (Docket 2)

I l

1

(

l

. - -