ML20129G797

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Test Rept on Electrical Separation Verification Test for Duquesne Light Co Beaver Valley Power Station,Unit 2 & FSAR Changes Based on Test to Close Outstanding Issues Re Reg Guide 1.75 Concerning Electrical Separation
ML20129G797
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley
Issue date: 06/04/1985
From: Carey J
DUQUESNE LIGHT CO.
To: Knighton G
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20129G803 List:
References
RTR-REGGD-01.075, RTR-REGGD-1.075 2NRC-5-081, 2NRC-5-81, NUDOCS 8506070370
Download: ML20129G797 (834)
v • d • e


Text

_ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ . _ _ . _

'Af 4 2)787-5141 (412) 923-1960 Nuclear Construction Division Telecopy (412) 787-2629 Robinson Plaza, Buildmg 2 Suite 210 Pittsburgh, PA 15205 June 4, 1985 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 ATTENTION: Mr. George W. Knighton, Chief Licensing Branch 3 Of fice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

SUBJECT:

Beaver Valley Power Station - Unit No. 2 Docket No. 50-412 Electrical Separation Criteria Gentlemen:

The attached information is provided to close outstanding issues related to Regulatory Guide 1.75 electrical separation at BVPS-2. This attachment consists of the following information:

1. Test Report on Electrical Separation Verification Testing for Duquesne Light Company's Beaver Valley Power Station - Unit 2, including the following Appendices:

Appendix A: Correlation of FSAR Figures with Test Configuration Justification Appendix B: Temperature Versus Time Plots Marked at Appropriate Durations Appendix C: Test Results Summary Appendix D: Calculation 12241-E111: Determination of 480V Motor Pigtail Failure Times Appendix E: Wyle Test Report on Electrical Separation Verifica-tion Testing for Duquesne Light Company's Beave r Valley Power Station - Unit 2

2. FSAR changes based on this test program including:
  • FSAR 1.8 (Regulatory Guide Position) 3
  • FSAR 8.3.1.4 (Independence of Redundant Systems)
  • FSAR Figures 8.3-16 through 8.3-73 We are presently revising the appropriate installation documents so based on the information provided in this submittal. <

C-ht k O

DUQUESNE LIC COMPANY . g SUBSCRIBED AND SW RN TO BEFORE ME THIS '

d d DAY OF s xt> , 1985. D*M[

%d t s ) Arik J v.tJ Carey Notary Public Vice President ANITA n.AIN5 COTER, NOTARY PUBUC ROBNON TW f l'6', AGEGHENY COUNTY O(j 4? 5 '/s,* 3gg g 7y f l

FAY COMt.t!SS!Of; "".93ES OCTOBER 20,1986 g1 S

fd4 2.pc4

\

A)Sie.

U;it$d Stttoo Nuciccr R;gulctery Connicaisn Mr. George W. Knighton, Chief

. Electrical Separation Criteria Page 2 GLB/wjs Attachme nt cc: Mr. R. DeYoung, Director (3) (1-w/a; 2-w/o)

Mr. S. Ebnetter (w/a)

Mr. J. Knox (w/a)

Mr. B. K. Singh, Project Manager (w/a)

Mr. G. Walton, NRC Resident Inspector (w/o)

INPO Records Center (w/o)

NRC Document Control Desk (w/a)

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA )

) SS:

COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY )

On this & day of sw , /[M , before me, a Notary Public in and for said [ommonwealth and County, personally appeared J. J. Carey, who being duly sworn, deposed and said that (1) he is Vice Pres ident of Duquesne Light, (2) he is duly authorized to execute and file the foregoing Submittal on behalf of said Company, and (3) the statements set forth in the Submittal are true and correct to the best of his knowledge.

2 1 Notary Public ANITA ELAINE FEITER, NOTARY PUBLIC ROBINSON TOWNSHIP. ALLECHENY COUNTY MY COMMIS3:0N EXPIRE S OCTOBER 20,1986 l

l l

si - -

w

,; ,- BVPS-2 FSAR.

1.8 Conformance to NRC Regulatory Guides-R.G. No. 1.75 Rev. 2 FSAR Reference Sections 7.1.2.2.1, 8.3.1.4, 8.3.2.2 PHYSICAL INDEPENDENCE OF ELECTRIC SYSTEMS (SEPTEMBER 1978)

. Beaver Valley Power Station - Unit 2 (BVPS-2) complies with Regulatory Guide 1.75 for . ' physical independence of electrical systems with the following clarifications:

1. General For the purposes of electrical separation, equivalent protection is provided through enclosure by rigid aluminum conduit, rigid steel conduit, electro-metallic tubing (EMT), flexible aluminum conduit, and flexible steel conduit. Enclosures provided to meet the requirements of BTP CMEB 9.5-1 are considered equivalent to enclosures provided for electrical separation and will have I hour or longer fire rating.

Metal clad cable, type MC, utilized in low energy, 120 V ac and 125 V de nominal, circuits and in low density applications is considered adequately protected. As such, the minimum separation between these cables and other cables, or raceway (where required) s is 1 in. These cables are further described as follows:

0273-1224109-B4 1

, ., BVPS-2 FSAR

a. Type MC cable is a factory assembly of conductors, :each individually insulated, enclosed in a metallic sheath of interlocking tape or a smooth or corrugated tube.
b. Largest conductor size is rumber 10 AWG.
c. No more than six conductors.
d. No more than three number 10 AWG conductors with remaining conductors of smaller size.
e. Aluminum sheath cable (a Type MC cable in which the aluminum is continuously welded) and/or interlocked armor cable may have an overall jacket of neoprene or hypalon.

Type S0 or SJO cords for lighting drops to fixtures are size 12 AWG or smaller and supply low energy,120 V ac or 125 V de, in low density applications. Adequate protection is provided by 1 in. or greater distance to Class IE raceways.

A raised floor panel can be used as a barrier. Panels are 1 in.

thick particle board with 22 gauge steel top and bottom sheets, and are fire rated Class A. These panels are considered a barrier when used in a configuration as shown in IEEE Standard 384-1974, Figure 2, 3, or 4.

0273-1224109-B4 2

y BVPS-2 FSAR

'The Cable Spreading Areas (CSA - Main Control' Room, . Cable

~

- . Spreading Room, and Computer Room) are protected areas and are not' exposed to potential hazards such as high pressure piping, missiles, flammable material. . flooding, or wiring that _ . is not

,; ').'Id.= - re t a rda nt . They do not contain high energy equipment such

'N

,_; . ,as switchgear, trarsformers, rotating equipment, or potential sources of missiles or pipe whip and ' are not used for storing flammable materials.

the General Plant Areas (GPA) have been analyzed for potential hazards and as such are categorized as areas where the damage potential' is limited to failures or faults internal to the electrical equipment or circuits.

2. Position C.6 Analyses of potential hazards in Section 5.1.1.1 of IEEE Standard 384-1974 are accomplished as follows: g e.

a) The high pressure piping and missile analyses are described in Sections 3.6 and 3.5, respecitvely.

b) The fire protection analyses are outlined in Section 9.5.1 and the Fire Protection Evaluation Report (see Table 1.7-3) c) Flame retardant characteristics of cable systems are described in Section 8.3.3.

0273-1224109-B4 3

W BVPS-2 FSAR d) .The building design for ' external and internal flooding is described in Sections 3.4 and 3.8, respectively. The environmental effects on safety-related components due to internal flooding are described in Sections ;3.6B, 3.4, and 3.11.

An extensive test program has been conducted at ~ Wyle Labs in

-Huntsville, Alabama in accordance with Section 5.1.1.2 of IEEE Standard 384-1974, "IEEE Trial-Use Criteria for Separation of Class IE Equipment and Circuits", to establish minimum separation distances for BVPS-2. A test report, " Test Report on Electrical Separation Verification Testing for Duquesne Light Company's l- Beaver ' Valley Power Station - Unit 2", including. the Wyle test L- report has been submitted under separate submittal. .(See Table 1.7-3). The conclusions of this report are as follows:

a) In the General Plant Areas the minimum horizontal spatial separation is reduced from 3 feet to 1 foot.

b) Ventilated tray covers- and cable bus enclosures are equivalent to solid tray covers.

c) Protective Wraps W

i) Lengths of cable enclosed in a protective wrap of woven silicon dioxide with a minimum of one inch free space i

027.b1224109-B4 4 T*

pr BVPS-2 FSAR protects adj acent cables from~ electrically induced' problems in .the cables within the protective wrap .

ii) Lengths of cable enclosed in a protective wrap of woven silicon dioxide . with a minimum of one inch - free air space are _ protected from electrically induced problems in adjacent cables.

iii) Lengths of cable enclosed in a protective wrap of woven silicon dioxide are protected from electrically induced problems in adjacent cables when the adjacent cables are also enclosed in a protective wrap 'of woven silicon dioxide.

iv) The protective wrap of woven silicon dioxide (Trade Name: SIL-TEMP) is'normally 54 mils thick and is wrapped longitudinally around cable (s) with a 100% overlap (i.e.

two thicknesses). The protective wrap of woven silicon dioxide may also be a tape, nominally 125 mils thick, applied helically with a 50% lap (half-lapped). In either case an overall 50% lap (half-lapped) of 3M No. 69 glass tape is required.

d. In plant areas (both GPA and CSA) where plant arrangement precludes minimem spatial separation between redundant Class IE circuits or between Class 1E and nonClass IE circuits separation is achieved as follows:

0273-1224109-B4 5

y ,--- 1 e BVPS-2 FSAR n -

i) Tray to Tray (Figures 8.3-16 through 8.3-37)

Vertical -

One inch minimum free air space and a single tray cover Horizontal - One inch minimum free air space and a ' tray cover top and bottom on one tray ii) Tray to Conduit (Figures 8.3-38 through 8.3-43)-

Vertical -

One inch minimum free air space-Horizontal -

One inch minimum: free air space lii) Cable in Air to Cable in Air (Figures 8.3-44 through 8.3-55) i

-[J h Vertical -

One inch minimum free air space and C enclosure of.one circuit (group) in conduit or a protective wrap.

or Zero inch minimum free air space and enclosure of both circuits (groups) in protective wraps.

0273-1224109-B4 6

_ . _ . . . ~ .- _-

n ._ _

~- ~- BVPS-2 FSAR

^

Horizontal - One inch minimum free air space and-enclosure of one-circuit ~(group) in-

~

conduit or a protective wrap.

or Zero inch ~ minimum free air space and enclosure of-both circuits (Groups) in protective wraps.

iv) Cable in Air to Tray (Figures 8.3-56 through 8.3-67)

Vertical -

One inch minimum free air space and a tray cover or Zero inch minimum free air space with both a tray cover and enclosure of the cable in a protective wrap.

v) Cable in Air to Conduit (Figures 8.3-68 through 8.3-72)

Vertical - One inch minimum free air space Horizontal - One inch minimum free air space 0273-1224109-B4 7 c -______- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ . _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . _ _ - _

BVPS-2 FSAR

e. Inside Control Switchboards. and Instrument Cabinets

-separation between_ redundant Class IE or Class IE and Non-Class' IE wire (bundles) is - provided by one of. the following:

i) A barrier

11) A minimum of one inch free air space lii) Enclosing both wire (bundles) in a protective wrap of woven silicon dioxide (no overall glass tape).

For justification refer to the test report.

3. Position C.7 (Section 4.6 of IEEE Standard 384)

Minimum separation between Class IE and non-Class IE circuits is as specified in Sections 5.1.3, 5.1.4, or 5.6.2 of IEEE Standard 384-1974, except as discussed under Position C.6.

4. Position C.9 Cable trays for control and instrumentation cables may be filled above the side rails where the overfill has been limited to a maximum of 1 1/2 in. above the top of the side rail and where solid hat covers with a 2 in, raised flat center section are used to enclose the top of the cable tray as shown on Figure 8.3-73.

0273-1224109-B4 8

y

~

gy- ;I

& , c c

l:L BVPS-2 FSAR p ~4 ---

m z5. LPosition'C.10

~.

.t y '

- Class - 1E cable ' and - raceways shall be marked at intervals. not h_-

l'- '

exceeding 15 ft and shall be plainly visible. ,

-3

'61 Position'C.12 5

t

, a. - Power cables that supply power to the control, computer, or cable spreading room panels, limited to 120 V ac or 125 V de, L.

are enclosed-in rigid metallic conduit:or flexible conduit at o,

i the entrance to panels.

i,

' Power cables serving facilities in or traversing the control, b.

i computer, or cable spreading room, limited. to 480 V ac, 120 V ac, or 125 V de, are enclosed in rigid metallic conduit ,

or in flexible conduit at the entrance to panels or equipment.

p 1

c. As noted above in items a and b, all power cables are totally enclosed in rigid metallic conduit or in flexible conduit or in enclosed raceway and are not exposed to free air. Any potential electrical ' fires caused by fault current in the power cables ate not considered to be a credible hazard, I

since fires resulting from fault current would be contained i in the conduit. In addition, these rooms are protected areas l

l= and are not subject to external energetic events such as '

floods, high energy pipe breaks, and missiles.

l-0273-1224109-B4 9 l

l L

L L'

BVPS-2 FSAR

.=

d.- The loss - of the above cables, or the control,' computer, or cable spreading rooms due to the design basis event of fire, will not compromise the capability to achieve cold shutdown as out-lined in Section-9.5.1 and in the Fire Protection Evaluation Report.

e. .The Beaver Vall'ey Power Station - Unit 2 design utilizes a single cable spreading room.
7. Position C.16 (Section 5.6.2 of IEEE-Standard 384)

The minimum 6 in. separation (or a barrier) applies to spacing between exposed terminals, contacts, and equipment of redundant Class IE circuits or Class IE and non-Class IE circuits for testing and maintenance purposes. Separation between redundant Class IE, or Class 1E and non-Class IE wire (bundles) is as discussed undei Position C.6.

Separation requirements for Westinghouse NSSS equipment are specifically addressed in Section 7.1.2.2.

l t

l 0273-1224109-B4 10 1

-s.  :.t BVPS-2 FSAR 8.3.1.4 Independence of Redundant Systems

.8.3.1.4.1 Principal Criteria The principal design criterion that establishes the minimum requirements for preserving the independence of redundant Class IE power systems through physical arrangement and separation and for ensuring the minimum required equipment availability during any design basis event (Class IE power system and design basis event are defined - in IEEE Standard 308') is as follows:

Class IE electrical equipment is physically and electrically separated from its redundant counterpart or mechanically protected as required to prevent the occurrence of common mode failures. Separation of equip-ment is maintained to prevent Icss of redundant features from single failures.

8.3.1.4.2 Equipment, Raceway, and Cable (in air) Considerations Design features of the major Class IE system components which ensure con-formance to the design bases are described below.

The safety-related portions of the onsite ac power system are divided into two load groups (trains). The safety-related actions of each load group are redundant and independent of the safety actions provided by its redundaat counterpart.

0284-1224109-B4 1

( ,- - .,

8

. Redundant safety-related systems are not subject to common mode failure through failure of the ventilation system. The ventilation systems are discussed in Section 9.4.

Redundant safety-related systems are located in fire protected areas. The fire protection system is discussed and analyzed in Section 9.5.1 and in the Fire Protection Evaluation Report. (See Table 1.7-3).

Safety-related equipment in all plant areas is either protected from auto-matic fire protection effluents or, on the basis of test data, has demon-strated its operability in the environment that may be caused by the fire '

protection effluents.

Redundant safety-related systems (including cable, electrical equipment, actuated equipment, sensors, and sensor to processor connections) are located in protected areas. Missile protection is discussed and analyzed in Section 3.5. Flood protection is discussed and analyzed in Sections 3.4 and 3.11. Protection against postulated pipe rupture is discussed and analyzed in Section 3.6. Seismic design is discussed and analyzed in Sections 3.7 and 3.10. Wind, hurricane, and tornado prote.ction is discussed and analyzed in Section 3.3. Environmental (normal and postulated accident) design is discussed and analyzed in Section 3.11. Protection from rain, ice, snow, and lightning is inherent in station building and electrical system design.

l

{ The design criteria for redundant safety-related systems ensure that no single equipment maintenance outage, equipment malfunction, or operator l

l 0284-1224109-B4 2 l

\

BVPS-2 FSAR action will prevent a safety-related system from performing its intended safety function.

The loss of the preferred power supply in conjunction with any postulated natural phenomenon will not prevent a safety-related system from performing its intended safety function.

i The independence of the redundant safety-related systems is preserved by physical as well as electrical separation.

Separation is accomplished as follows:

1. The emergency generator, switchgear, load centers, motor control centers, and distribution panels associated with one safety-related train are physically separated from their redundant counterparts of the other safety-related train as discussed in Section 8.3.1.1.
2. The physical description of the containment electrical penetration areas is discussed in Section 8.3.1.1.16.
3. Associated circuits per R.G. 1.75 are identified with the same color code as, and meet all the requirements of, the Class IE circuit with which they are associated up to and including an isolation device. Beyond the isolation device they are identified as nonsafety-related.

I%

0284-1224109-B4 3

BVPS-2 FSAR

4. The minimum separation distance between redundant Class 1E cables and between Class IE cables and non-Class IE cables is:

General Plant Areas (GPA)

(Refer to Table 8.3-6 for specific areas) 5 feet vertically 1 foot horizontally Cable Spreading Areas (CSA)

(Main Control Room, Cable Spreading Room, and Computer Room) 3 feet vertically 1 foot horizontally The vertical spacing distance between trays is measured from the top of the side rail of the lower tray to the bottom of the side rail of the upper tray. The horizontal spacing distance between trays is measured from outside of side rail flange to outside of side rail flange.

In general, the minimum vertical free air space between trays is 8 inches. ,

Where plant arrangement precludes the minimum separation distance, actual installations conform to one of the acceptable arrangements 0284-1224109-B4 4

m _r n BVPS-2 FSAR listed below. These acceptable arrangements between redundant' Class IE cables : and between Class IE and non-Class IE cables . is achieved by maintaining lesser distances in conjunction with .the use of tray covers, enclosed raceway, protective wraps, or barriers.

Acceptable arrangements are as follows:

a. Tray to Tray Separation In the GPA, where a 1 in. minimum vertical free air space is maintained between redundant Class IE trays, a tray cover on the top of the lower tray or a tray cover on the bottom of the upper tray is installed as shown on Figure 8.3-16, Details A and B.

In the GPA, where a 1 in. minimum horizontal free air space is maintained between redundant Class 1E trays, tray covers top and bottom of one of the trays are installed as shown on Figure 8.3-16, Details C and D.

In the GPA, where a 1 in. minimum vertical free air space is maintained between non-Class IE and Class IE, a tray cover on the top of the lower tray or a tray cover on the bottom of the upper tray is installed as shown on Figure 8.3-17, Details A, B, C, and D.

t l

0284-1224109-84 5 l

lh

'a

=

.- i BVPS-2 FSAR In - the GPA, where a 1 in. minimum horizontal free air space is maintained between non-Class 1E and Class 1E trays, tray covers on the top and bottom of one of the trays are installed as shown on Figure 8.3-17, Details E and F.

In the ' GPA, where a 1 in. minimum horizontal free ' air space is.

maintained between: a Class IE tray running vertically and a redundant Class 1E tray running ' horizontally, a ' tray cover on either tray is -installed as shown on Figures 8.3-18 and 8.3-19.

In the GPA, where a 1 in. minimum horizontal free air space is

. maintained' between a Class IE tray running vertically and a non-Class IE tray running horizontally, a tray cover on either tray is installed as shown on Figures 8.3-20 and 8.3-21.

In the GPA, where a 1 in. minimum horizontal free air space is maintained between a non-Class 1E tray running vertically and a Class IE tray running horizontally, a tray cover on either tray is installed as shown on Figures 8.3-22 and 8.3-23.

In the CSA, where a 1 in, minimum vertical free air space is maintained between redundant Class 1E trays, a tray cover on the bottom of the upper tray or on the top of the lower tray is installed as shown on Figure 8.3-24, Details A and B.

0284-1224109-B4 6

BVPS-2 FSAR In the CSA, where a 1 in. minimum horizontal free air space is maintained between ' redundant Class IE trays, tray covers on the top and bottom of one of the trays are installed as shown on Figure 8.3-24, Details C and D.

In the CSA, where a 1 in. minimum vertical free air space is maintained between a non-Class 1E tray and a Class 1E tray, a tray cover on the bottom of the upper tray or a tray cover on the top of the lower tray is installed as shown on Figure 8.3-25, Details A, B, C, and D.

In the CSA, where a 1 in, minimum horizontal free air space is maintained between non-Class 1E and Class IE trays, tray covers on the top and bottom of one of the trays are installed as shown on Figure 8.3-25, Details E and F.

In the CSA, where a 1 in. minimum horizontal free air space is maintained between a Class IE tray running vertically and a redundant Class 1E tray running horizontally, a tray cover on either tray is installed as shown on Figures 8.3-26 and 8.3-27.

In , the CSA, where a 1 in. minimum horizontal free air space is maintained between a Class IE tray running, vertically and a non-Class IE tray running horizontally, a tray cover on either tray is installed as shown on Figures 8.3-28 and 8.3-29.

0284-1224109-B4 7

q s

BVPS-2 FSAR ,

L t In the CSA, where a 1 in. minimum horizontal free air space is maintained between a non-Class 1E tray running vertically and a Class 1E tray running horizontally, a tray cover on either tray is

-installed as shown on Figures 8.3-30 and 8.3-31.

In the GPA, where a 1 in. minimum vertical free air space is maintained between a Class IE tray and a redundant Class IE tray which cross in a vertical plane, a tray . cover on the top of the lower tray or on the bottom of the upper tray is installed as shown of Figure 8.3-32.

In the GPA, where a 1 in. minimum vertical free air space is maintained between a Class 1E tray and a non-Class IE tray which cross in a vertical plane, a tray cover on the top of the lower tray or on the bottom of the upper tray is installed as shown on Figure 8.3-33.

In the GPA, where a 1 in. minimum vertical free air space is maintained between a non-Class IE tray and a Class IE tray which cross in a vertical plane, a tray cover on the top of the lower tray or on the bottom of the upper tray is installed as shown on Figure 8.3-34 In the CSA, where a 1 in. minimum vertical free air space is maintained between a Class IE tray and a redundant Class IE tray l

which cross in vertical plane, a tray cover on the top of the 0284-1224109-B4 8

y -.

BVPS-2 FSAR

.a 7 lower tray or on the bottom of the upper tray is installed as shown on Figure 8.3-35.

e In ' the CSA, ? where a' 1 in. minimum vertical free air space is' maintained between a Class 1E tray and a non-Class IE tray which cross in a vertical plane, a tray cover on the top of the lower

~

tray or on the bottom of the upper tray is installed as shown on Figure 8.3-36.

In the CSA, where a 1 in, minimum vertical free air space is maintained between a non-Class IE and a Class IE tray which cross in a vertical plane, a tray cover on the top of the lover tray or on the bottom of the upper tray is installed as shown on

-Figure 8.3-37.

In the above cases, where tray covers are not used, a barrier is provided per IEEE Standard 384-1974, Figure 2, 3, or 4.

b. Tray to Conduit Separation In the GPA, vertical separation between a Class IE tray and a redundant Class 1E conduit may be reduced to -1 in, as shown on Figure 8.3-38, Detail A.

In the GPA, vertical separation between a Class IE conduit and a redundant Class IE tray may be reduced to 1 in, as shown on Figure 8.3-38, Detail B.

0284-1224109-B4 9

1'

~ ' '

BVPS-2 FSAR-In the GPA, horizontal separation between a Class IE conduit and a redundant Class'1E tray may be reduced to 1 in, as shown on Figure 8.3-38, Detail C.

In the GPA, vertical separation between a Class IE tray and a non-Class IE conduit 'may be reduced to 1 in. as shown on

,., Figure 8.3-39, Detail A.

In the GPA, vertical separation between a Class 1E conduit and a non-Class 1E tray may be reduced to 1 in. as shown on Figure 8.3-39, Detail B.

In the GPA, horizontal separation between a Class IE conduit and a non-Class IE tray may be reduced to 1 in, as shown on Figure 8.3-39, Detail C.

In the GPA, vertical separation between a non-Class 1E tray and a Class 1E conduit may be reduced to 1 in. as shown on Figure 8.3-40, Detail A.

In the CPA, vertical separation between a non-Class 1E conduit and a Class IE tray may be reduced to 1 in, as shown on Figure 8.3-40, Detail B.

In the GPA, horizontal separation between a non-Class IE conduit and Class 1E tray may be reduced to 1 in. as shown on l

Figure 8.3-40, Detail C.

0284-1224109-B4 10

7 .

3

-o ,s BVPS-2 FSAR

- In - the CSA, - vertical separation between a Class ~1E tray and a '

redundant Class IE conduit may be reduced to 1 in. as shown on -

Figure 8.3-41, Detail A.

In the - CSA, vertical separation between a Class IE conduit and a redundant Class IE tray may be reduced to 1 in, as shown on Figure 8.3-41, Detail B.

In the CSA, horizontal separation between a Class IE conduit and a redundant Class 1E tray may be reduced to 1 in. as shown on Figure 8.3-41, Detail C.

In the CSA, vert.ical separation between a Class IE tray and a non-Class 1E conduit may be reduced to 1 in. as shown on Figure 8.3-42, Detail A.

, In the CSA, vertical separation between a Class IE conduit and a ll non-Class 1E tray may be reduced to 1 in, as shown on Figure 8.3-42, Detail B.

In the CSA, horizontal separation betwees a Class IE conduit and a non-Class 1E tray may be reduced to 1 in, as shown on Figure 8.3-42, Detail C.

In the CSA, vertical separation between a .aon-Class 1E tray and a Class IE conduit may be reduced to 1 in, as shown on Figure 8.3-43, Detail A.

l 0284-1224109-84 11

p BVPS-2 FSAR In the'CSA, vertical separation between a non-Class IE conduit and a Class 1E tray may be reduced to 1 in as shown on Figure 8.3-43, Detail B.

In the CSA, horizontal separation between a non-Class 1E conduit and a Class IE tray may be reduced to 1 in. as shown on Figure 8.3-43, Detail C.

c. Conduit to Conduit Separation In the GPA and CSA, separation between Class IE and redundant Class IE conduit or Class IE and non-Class IE conduit may be reduced to 1 in,
d. Cable in Air to Cable in Air Separation In the GPA, where cables are appropriately grouped together and either Class 1E group is installed in conduit or enclosed in protective wrap, separation between the redundant Class IE cables may be reduced to 1 in. as shown on Figure 8.3-44, Details A, B, C, and D.

In the GPA, where cables are appropriately grouped together and both Class IE groups are enclosed in a protective wrap, separation between the redundant Class IE cables may be reduced to 0 in. as shown on Figure 8.3-45.

0284-1224109-B4 12

1 BVPS-2 FSAR In the GPA, where cables are appropriately grouped together and the non-Class IE group is installed in conduit or enclosed in a protective wrap, separation between . the . Class IE cables and the non-Class -1E cables may be reduced. to 1 in. as shown on Figure 8.3-46, Details A, B, and C.

In the GPA, where cables are appropriately grouped together and are enclosed in a protective wrap, separation between Class IE cables and non-Class 1E cables may be reduced to 0 in, as shown on Figure 8.3-47, Details A, B, and C.

In the GPA, where cables are appropriately grouped together and the Class 1E group is installed in conduit or enclosed in a protective wrap, separation between the non-Class IE cable and the Class IE cable may be reduced to 1 in. as shown on Figure 8.3-48, Details A, B, and C.

In the GPA, where cables are appropriately grouped together and are enclosed in a protective wrap, separation between non-Class IE j cables and Class 1E cables may be reduced to 0 in. as shown on l Figure 8.3-49, Details A, B, and C.

In the CSA, where cables are appropriately grouped together and either Class IE group is installed in a conduit or enclosed in a protective wrap, separation between redundant Class 1E cables may be reduced to 1 in, as shown on Figure 8.3-50, Details A, B, C, and D.

0284-1224109-84 13

_ _ ~

~

~

o .

T BVPS-2 FSAR X In 7 thef CSA, wl re! cables ' are . appropriately grouped together and both-Class IE groups are enclosed in a protective wrap,tseparation.

between' redundant Class'1E cables may be reduced to 0'in, as shown on Figure 8.3-51.

.In the CSA, .where cables are appropriately ~ grouped together and the . non-Class 1E group is installed in conduit or enclosed in a protective wrap, , separation between the Class 1E cables and.the non-Class 1E ' cables may be reduced to 1 in, as shown on Figure 8.3-52, Details A, B, and C.

In the - CSA, where cables are appropriately grouped together and are enclosed in a protective wrap, separation between Class IE cables and non-Class IE cables may be reduced to 0 in, as shown on Figure 8.3-53, Details A, B, and C.

In the CSA, where cables are appropriately grouped together and the Class IE group is installed in conduit or enclosed in a protective wrap, separation between the non-Class IE cables and the Class IE cables may be reduced to 1 in, as shown on Figure 8.3-54, Details A, B, and C.

In the CSA, where cables are appropriately group together and are enclosed in a protective wrap, separation between non-Class 1E cables and Class 1E cables may be reduced to 0 in, as shown on

  • Figure 8.3-55, Details A, B, and C.

0284-1224109-B4 14 I L

w_-__--______-___

T >:L ~*'

.In the . above L cases, -where - conduit or protective wraps are not

=-

.used, a barrier is provided in accordance -with' IEEE_ Standard 384-1974, Figure 2, 3, or:4.

e. Cable in Air to Tray Separation In the GPA, where a 1 in. minimum vertical free air space- is maintained between' redundant- Class 1E trays and a tray cover is provided in accordance with Figure 8.3-16, Detail A, where a cable enters the upper tray, separation between the Class IE cable and the - redundant Class IE tray _ may be reduced to 1 in. as shown on Figure 8.3-56.

In the GPA, where a 1 in. minimum vertical free air space is maintained between redundant Class 1E trays and a tray cover is provided in accordance with Figure 8.3-16, Detail A, where a cable enters the upper tray and is enclosed in a protective wrap, separation' between the Class IE cable and the redundant Class 1E cable tray may be reduced to 0 in, as shown on Figure 8.3-57.

In the GPA,-where a 1 in, minimum vertical free air space between Class 1E and non-Class IE trays is maintained and a tray cover is provided in accordance with Figure 8.3-17, Detail A, where a Class IE cable enters the Class 1E tray, separation between the Class IE cable and the non-Class IE tray may be reduced to 1 in, as shown on Figure 8.3-58.

l l

L l 0284-1224109-B4 15 r

y- ,

f;}

'BVPS-2 FSAR p

~

_ In the GPA,; where a 1 in. minimum vertical' free air space between p . . . .

. Class IF.and non-Class IE trays is maintained and a tray cover is t

provideo in 'accordance with Figure . 8.'3-17, Detail ' A, where a Class 1E s',le' enters the Class IE tray and is enclosed in a protective wrap, separation between the Class IE cable and the non-Class IE tray may .be reduced to 0 in, as shown on Figure 8.3-59.

L'

.In the GPA, where a 1 in. minimum vertical free air space between 1

non-Class 1E and Class IE trays is maintained and a tray cover is

j. provided in accordance with Figure 8.3-17, Detail C, where a non-Class IE cable enters the non-Class IE tray, separation between . the non-Class 1E cable and the Class IE tray may be

~

reduced to 1 in, as shown on Figure 8.3-60.

In the GPA, where a 1 in, minimum vertical free air space between non-Class IE and Class IE trays is maintained and a tray cover is provided in accordance with Figure 8.3-17, Detail C, where a non-Class IE cable enters the non-Class IE tray and is enclosed in a protective wrap, separation between the non-Class IE cable the Class 1E tray may be reduced to 0 in, as shown on Figure 8.3-61.

In the CSA, where a 1 in. minimum vertical free air space is maintained between redundant Class 1E trays and a tray cover is provided in accordance with Figure 8.3-24, Detail A, where a cable enters the upper tray, separation between the Class IE cable and 0284-1224109-84 16 L . .

BVPS-2 FSAR the redundant Class 1E tray may be reduced to 1 in. as shown on Figure 8.3-62.

In - the CSA, where a 1 in. minimum vertical . free air space. is maintained - between redundant Class IE trays and a tray' cover _is provided in accordance with Figure 8.3-24, Detail A, where a cable

. enters the upper tray and is enclosed ' in a protective ' wrap, separation between the. Class 1E cable and the redundant Class 1E cable tray may be reduced to - 0 in. as shown on Figure 8.3'-63.

s In the CSA, where -a.1 in. minimum vertical free air space between Class IE and non'-Class IE trays 'is maintained and a tray cover is provided in .accordance with Figure 8.3-25, Detail A, where a Class 1E cable enters .the Class 1E . tray, separation. between the Class IE cable and the non-Class IE tray may be reduced to 1 in.

.( as shown on Figure 8.3-64.

b L In the CSA, where a 1 in. minimum vertical free air space between i y

Class IE.and non-Class 1E trays -is maintained and a tray cover is .

provided in accordance with Figure 8.3-25, Detail A, where a Class 1E cable enters the Class IE tray and is enclosed in a protective We wrap, separation between- the Class IE cable and the non-Class 1E

. tray may be reduced to 0 in. as shown on Figure 8.3-65.

In the CSA, where a 1 in. minimum vertical free air space between non-Class IE and Class IE trays is maintained and a tray cover is provided in accordance with Figure 8.3-25, Detail C, where a

.-V 0284-1224109-B4 17

BVPS-2 FSAR l'

l' l

non-Cla'ss 1E -cable enters. the non-Class IE tray, separation.

-between the non-Class 1E cable and the Class IE tray may be.

reduced to l'in. as shown on Figure 8.3-66.

In the CSA, where a' I in. minimum vertical free air space between non-Class IE and Class IE- tray is maintained and a tray . cover is provided in accordance with Figure 8.3-25, Detail C ,- where a non-Class IE cable enters the non-Class IE tray and is enclosed in a protective wrap, separation between the non-Class IE cable and the Class IE tray may be reduced to 0 in, as shown on Figure 8.3-67.

f. Cable in Air to Conduit Separation i

I' In the GPA, separation between Class 1E cables and a redundant Class IE conduit may be reduced to 1 in. as shown on i Figure 8.3-68.

I i

l In the GPA, separation between Class IE cables and a' non-Class 1E j_ conduit may be reduced to 1 in. as shown on Figure 8.3-69, i'

Detail A.

s In the GPA, separation between non-Class IE cables and a Class IE conduit may be reduced- to 1 in. as shown on Figure 8.3-69, Detail B.

~

0284-1224109-B4 18 '

BVPS-2 FSAR=

In the CSA, separation between Class IE ' cables and a redundant-Class IE conduit may be reduced to 1 in. as shown on Figure 8.3-70.

- In the. CSA, separation between Class- 1E cables and a non-Class IE conduit may be reduced to 1 in, as shown on. Figure 8.3-71, Details A, B, and C.

In the CSA, separation between non-Class IE cables and a Class IE conduit- may be reduced to 1 in, as shown on Figure 8.3-72,

' Details'A, B, and C.

5. In addition to separation by train and channel, there is also separa-tion by voltage level and service within a train or channel. A com-puter program for the routing of cables prohibits the scheduling of a Class 1E cable in an assigned raceway of either a redundant Class IE cable .or a non-Class IE cable. In addition, cables are routed in

- separate raceway systems according to the voltage service levels given in Table 8.3-4. Each voltage service level corresponds to the race-way/ cable identification letter given in this table (i.e. , H, L, K, C, or X). Each cable with one -identification number would be separated from cables with 'a different identification number (i.e. , H (4160 V) cables are not run with L (large 480 V) cables). In special cases, C and K cables may be run together in the same tray and the raceway would be designated a K tray. In other special cases, K and L cables may be run together in the same tray if maintained spacing is provided to the 0284-1224109-B4 19

BVPS-2 FSAR cables in accordance with the L spacing in Table 8.3-4. The raceway would then be designated an L tray.

Trays - for. cables of different voltage levels are generally stacked in descending voltage order with the highest voltage cables in the upper-most trays. Instrument cables are generally installed in the lowest tray.

6. In general, Class 1E equipment is not installed in potential missi1c-producing areas. Where this is not practical, suitable missile pro-tection is provided as discussed in Section 3.5.
7. In general, trays in the same vertical stack are separated by 8 3/4 in.

minimum as measured from the bottom of the side rail of the upper-tray to the-top of the side rail of the lower tray.

8. In Seismic Category I areas, H (4160 V) and L (large 480 V) cables will be enclosed either by use of rigid or flexible conduit, protective wraps, or top and bottom tray covers. In Seismic Category II areas, H (4160 V) and L (large 480 V) cables whose separation is reduced below 5 ft vertical and 1 ft horizontal will be enclosed as detailed for Seismic Category I areas above. Refer to Section 3.2 for explanation of Seismic Category I and Seismic Category II areas and listing of Seismic Category I areas. l l

l 1

1

9. Ventilated cable tray covers are equivalent to solid cable tray covers. ,

0284-1224109-B4 20

" ^

BVPS-2 FSAR

10. Lengths of cable enclosed in a protective wrap of woven silicon dioxide (trade name - Sil-Temp) and glass tape are con;idered to be protected from electrically induced problems in adjacent cables to the same degree as the same cable in an enclosed raceway.
11. Enclosures provided to meet the requirements of BTP CMEB 9.5-1 are considered. equivalent to enclosures provided for electrical separation and will have 1-hour or longer fire rating.
12. Fire barriers are installed ' at all locations where trays penetrate a fire rated wall or floor.
13. Cable splices in raceways are prohibited.
14. The cable spreading areas (main control room, cable spreading room, and computer room) are protected areas and are not exposed to potential hazards such as high pressure piping, missiles, flammable material, -

flooding, or wiring that is not flame retardant. They-do not contain high energy equipment such as switchgear, transformers, rotating equipment, or potential sources of missiles or pipe whip and are not used for storing flammable materials.

15. The General Plant Areas (GPA) have been analyzed for potential hazards and as such are categorized as areas where damage potential is limited to failures or faults internal to the electrical equipment or circuits.

L-0284-1224109-B4 21 L

m. ;

4 L .

BVPS-2.FSAR I

16. Cables in the cable spreading areas (CSA), that converge prior to entering control and instrument panels, in general perform control and instrument functions. Power cables . are limited to ' feeders supplying power to equipment or ventilation - units used for those areas. Power-cables'in these areas are installed in conduit.
17. In general, the minimum separation distance between redundant Class 1E

, circuits and between Class IE and non-Class .1E circuits, internal'to control switch boards and instrument' cabinets is as follows:

For Exposed Contacts and Terminals 6 inches For Wire Bundles 1 inch.

Where device arrangement precludes the minimum separation at exposed contacts.or terminals, a barrier or enclosure is provided. The barrier or enclosure extends 1 inch beyond exposed contacts or terminals.

Where wire bundle arrangement precludes the minimum separation, a barrier is provided or both bundles are enclosed in a protective wrap.

Where the minimum separation between Class IE circuits and non-Class IE r

circuits .is not maintained and installation of a barrier is not 0284-1224109-B4 22

BVPS-2 FSAR possible, the non-Class IE circuit is classified as part of tite -

Class IE circuit up to an isolation device to prevent interactio 2 between Class IE and non-Class IE circuits.

Separation' requirements for Westinghouse NSSS equipment are speci-fically addressed in Section 7.1.2.2.

18. A raised floor panel can be used as a barrier. Panels are 1 in. thick particle board with 22 gauge steel top and bottom sheets and are fire rated Class A. These panels are considered a barrier when used in a configuration as shown in IEEE Standard 384-1974, Figure 2, 3, or 4.
19. Separation of cables (i .e. , - between redundant Class IE circuits and between Class IE and non-Class IE circuits) at entrances to control panels and cabinets is consistent with the area in which they are

. located.

.20. Separation is not required between- either Train A (orange) and Channel I (red), or Train B (purple) and Channel II (white) except for service (or voltage class) considerations.

21. Each of the four channels of the excore neutron detection system are run in a dedicated conduit system. In addition to the standard separa-tion required between' Class IE and non-Class 1E cables detailed in the above paragraphs of Section 8.3.1.4, cables in this system require the following supplemental separation:

0284-1224109-B4 23

BVPS-2~FSAR i

. Each excore channel cable will maintain a separation of 2 ft from another excore channel cable.

Each excore ' channel cable will maintain a separation of 2 ft from any 480 V ac, 120 V ac, and 125 V de power' or L control .

cable.

Each excore channel cable will maintain a separation of 6 ft from any 4160 V power cable.

[

i 0284-1224109-B4 24

+>-

N J Q) *:

GENERAL PLANT AREAS -TR AY TO TRAY CLASS 1E TO REDUNDANT CLASS 1E VERTICAL A l 9 A i 1 U NOTE 1 1" MIN. 1" MIN.

(TYPICAL) NOTE 2 (TYPICAL) 6 B l 8 D E T A l l "A" OR D ET A I L "B" LEGEND A-CLASS IE RACEWAY B-REDUNDANT CLASS IE RACEWAY CLASS 1E TO REDUNDANT CLASS 1E N- NON-CLASS IE R ACEWAY HORIZONTAL NOTES: 1. TR AY COVER

2. VERT 4 CAL SPACING DISTANCE FOR CABLE I I TRAYS IS MEASURED FROM THE TOP OF A B THE SIDE RAll OF THE LOWER TRAY TO I I THE BOTTOM OF THE SIDE RAll OF THE UPPER TRAY j ., y ,

DETAIL"C" OR FIGURE 8.3 -16 i i GENERAL PLANT AREAS (GPA)

A B ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION IN, ARRANGEMENTS BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 a FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT DETAIL"D ,

,Y -.

GENERAL PLANT AREAS -TR AY TO TRAY CLASS 1E TO NON- CLASS 1E NON-CLASS 1E TO CL ASS 1E VERTICAL VERTICAL A l, r s

A 1 F N ,r i

N la if NOTE 1 l MIN. = 1" MIN.

(TYPICAL NOTE 2 (TYPICAL)

. m , , m 4 N 3 A A N l.

D E T A l l "A" OR D ETA I L "B" DET A I L "C" OR DET A ll "D" LEGEND CL ASS 1E TO NON- CL ASS 1E; B-RED NDANT CLASS IE RACEWAY NON-CLASS 1E TO CLASS 1E N- NON-CLASS IE R ACEWAY HORIZONTAL NOTES: 1. TR AY COVER

2. VERTICAL SPACING DISTANCE FOR CABLE I I TRAYS IS MEASURED FROM THE TOP OF A N THE SIDE RAIL OF THE LOWER TRAY TO I I THE BOTTOM OF THE SIDE RAll OF THE UPPER TRAY j.

DETAIL"E" OR FI G U R E 8.3 - 17 e i GENERAL PLANT AREAS (GPA)

A N ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION

.. "'"' ARRANGEMENTS BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 a FINAL SAFETY AN ALYSIS REPORT DETAIL "F

q .

GENER'AL PL ANT ARE AS-TR AY .TO. TRAY '

CLASS 1E TO-REDUNDANT. CLASS 1El A

--* *- 1" MIN. + ,

'" A.

---~~

o . n.

I' M IN.1 1* MIN.

o ,

u ,

A B B-N // a  %-

a l' MIN. e--NOTEI NOTE 1- j' MIN.

//d -

,N. *s

+

A SECTION A-A LEGEND A - CLASS 1E RACEWAY B - REDUNDANT CLASS IE R ACEWAY pgggy 7 g,3 yg N - NON CLASS IE RACEWAY .

NOTE 1: TR AY COVER ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION ARRANGEMENT l

. BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT.2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

, 1 I

2 O p T

i N

U T

-  % NR OO g N TI EP O A T R TI S S

N A R I

S rI M

R E /

~ ' A WL

~ A P OA

- E PN A

9 S NETY A

' N O

1

- pLE EL T Y

sA I

T 3 B ML E C 8 A E AF

_ E S TG VA t - E P NR S R E AE L Y N A cI U CR A VA M- G CREI N R E -

I F AABF T1 O S 1 T S

.A E

T O . s Y L N A C R T TN

- A SD AN O EU RD A RE T

NO T A

LE +A PI A4 S Y LS A AA W RL 1 E E C EC T A

N O R Y E N E A W

G N

I

[ Y 1

A SC E

M # SA "1

E AR L

C CE R A I E

- RT V N S S O EAD AL 1

C SN C Y SU A m'

ADN LEO CRN R

T

%, D N - - -

EABN 1

E

- T G

E O L N O -

,) J , , ;i , ]! l l,  ; .{ Ili! . ' 4

O O O .

GENERAL PLANT AREAS-TR AY TO TRAY CLASS 1E TO NON-CLASS 1E 1

I i A

~ ~ 1" w N. + .

-v A

~ ~~~

a u j' uis / 1' MIN l " _ _ _ .

. / / " ,

i .

l' j

1. MIN *--NOTE I NOTE 1 -

9y f

1* MIN.

/ o

.~- ,fs

+

A SECTION A- A l

LEGEND A f LASS IE RACEWAY j B - REDUNDANT CLASS IE R ACEWAY FIGURE 8.3-20 N - NON CLASS lE. R ACFWAY GENERAL PLANT AREAS'(GPA)-

NOTEI: TR AY COVER ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION

'i ARRANGEMENT BE AVEP VALLEY POWEP STATION-UNIT 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT i

\,

l 2

T I

) N A U P T

, s G NR

( O O I P S NO T

A E

. AI TR ET S SI

'l IN_

RA RS M AR E Y

, ' A WL A TP OA NE PN A

N 1

A S TY A NE Y N O 2L E EL T fA / _E I T

C 8

- P L

3. L B ML E A E AF ATG VA Y s

. nS ER P NR S RE E AEV L A

R

'l NI M_:

UNCR A AN G

I ECREI T FGAABF O E I T l E

T O .fs YS J t

AS RA T L' C

S N AO E

R N

AO T

T E N I A

L G +A P S A A+

L L Y A

AC W E

R C E ,

A N R Y E E W A G .

Y I

E N A SA SC I

N M W AR

  • 1 E L C CE R A T E

RT S V 4 N S O EA A I

C D L Y SN C A

' S d ADN R LEO T vA m

D CRP N - - -

EABN G

I I

E T

E O L N

g, -f. s

%j' N)

  • GENERAL PLANT ARE AS-TR AY TO TRAY

, NON-CLASS 1E TO CLASS IE A

---> +-1** MIN + ,

w

- - - ~~

N a

/

f ai y = MIN I MIN P ___. . .

a I'  !

il \

l' MIN ~ NOTEI NOTE 1 - ,

/ I' MI N.

v _ _ _ .. Y/ / v

+

A SECTION A- A LEGEND r

A - CLASS IE RACEWAY B - REDUNDANT CLASS 1E R ACEWAY N - NON rLASS 1E R ACEWAY FIGURE 8.3 - 22 GENERAL PLANT AREAS (GPA)

NOTE 1: 1 RAY COVER ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION ,

ARRANGEMENT ,

BE AVER VALLEY POWER STATIOfJ-UNIT 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

t 1

2 O T I

N U

T

. x NR OO N TI EP O A I

TR S

T S N_

A R I

S

'l R E Y

, IM_ A WL

, A P OA

- E PN A

3 S NETY A A N 2 E Y p / O I

T C

3 L

B EL T MLAFE 8

E A T GV A E

nS E R

P NR S E AEV A L Y 'I N_

U A CR A I

R M_ .

G I CREI N T F AABF O 1 TE I E

T O . s YS N AS RA TL

- C SO A T O E R E A

1 S

TS NA AL LC - AI +A P

N LO Y A

AN W E

R 1 E C E ,

A N O R Y E N E W A G

N I

[ A Y

l A SA SC E

M W "1 E AR L

C CE R A I E

RT V

N S S O EAD AL 1

C SN C Y

. S U A ADN R LEO 1 w

N

~,

C CRN N - - -

EABN G

I E

T E O L N O

O O O .

i CABLE SPREADING AREAS -TR AY TO TRAY CLASS 1E TO REDUNDANT CLASS 1E l VERTICAL l A l y A g i f j NOTE 1 3" MIN. 1" MIN.

] (TYolCAL)

NOTE 2 (TYPICAL)

'B j' "

B d i

D E T A ll "A" OR D ETA I L "B" 1 LEGEND l A-CLASS 1E RACEWAY

] B-REDUNDANT CLASS IE RACEWAY j CLASS lE TO REDUNDANT CLASS 1E N- NON-CLASS IE RACEWAY HOR IZONTA L NOTES: 1. TR AY COVER

2. VERTICAL SPACING DISTANCE FOR CABLE I I TRAYS IS MEASURED FROM THE TOP OF t A B THE SIDE RAll OF THE LOWER TRAY TO 8 I THE BOTTOM OF THE SIDE RAIL OF THE
y. gg UPPER TRAY i DETAll "C" OR FIGURE 8.3-24 i

A CABLE SPREADING AREAS (CSA) 8 i , , ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION l "'"'

ARRANGEMENTS

BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 D ETA ll "D a

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

p --

L) J U .

CABLE SPREADING AREAS -TR AY TO TRAY CLASS 1E TO NON- CLASS 1E NON-CLASS 1E TO CL ASS 1E VERTICAL VERTICAL l A l A N l 9 N l, 9 9 } ,

NOTE 1 " MIN. I " MIN. I " MIN. I" MIN.

(TYPICAL) NOTE 2 (TYPICAL)

' " ' ' d N N " A A l

D E T A l l "A" OR DETA I L "B" D ET A l l "C" OR DET All "D" LEGEND A-CLASS IE RACEWAY CL ASS 1E TO NON- CL ASS 1E; B-REDUNDANT CLASS 1E RACEWAY NON-CLASS 1E TO C L A S S 1 E. N- NON-CLASS IE RACEWAY HORIZONTAL NOTES: 1. TR AY COVER

2. VERTICAL SPACING DISTANCE FOR CABLE I I TRAYS IS MEASURED FROM THE TOP OF A N THE SIDE RAll OF THE LOWER TRAY TO U l THE BOTTOM OF THE SIDE RAll OF THE
y. g , UPPER TRAY DETAll "E" OR FIGURE 8.3-25 i i CABLE SPREADING AREAS (CSA)

A N ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION e t. MIN.

ARRANGEMENTS BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 DETAIL "F a FINAL SAFETY AN ALYSIS REPORT

p ,c~

v'

  • CABLE SPREADING AREAS-TRAY TOTRAY CLASS 1E TO REDUNDANT CLASS 1E t

! A

  • +-I" MIN. + s ,

-v A i 3 7 g a / l e

g MIN l' MIN 1

l 0 . / o , t A B B a / h l

  • MIN *--NOTEI NOTE 1- I ' M I N.

f 1

o "

, .~. ~f~

! +

A SECTION A- A i

l LEGEND A - CL ASS 1E RACEWAY

] B - REDUNDANT CLASS IE RACEWAY FIGURE 8.3-26 N - NON CL ASS lE R ACEWAY p NOTE 1: TR AY COVER ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION ARRANGEMENT BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

1 2

m/

/

)

T I

N A U _

S - T _

. s C NR

( OO S TI EP A A T R E S R S I

'1 N_

I A R E Y S

M

- ~

G WL

- A N OA A

I PN D

7A T YA B

N 2- E NE Y O EL T fA / I T

C 3. P 8S R MLA EF E

E S

G VA Y s

~

EE NR S A 'I N_ RL AE L i

UB R V A A R M_ . G A RE N TE I FC ABF I

O I TSS I E

YA T O . s AL N RC TT

- N SA AD EN RU 3]N y

AD E

G N

R I

DO T A

EE R1 A+ +A PS SS Y A

EA W L L 1 E

E C

BC T A

A O N

R Y C E W A N

I

[ B Y

l A SA SC E

W W "1 E AR L

C CE R A I E

RT V

= N S O EA S I A C D L Y SN SU C A ADN R L EO T v

A

~,

D CRN N - - -

EABN G

i E

T E o L N O

s

+ .

2

) T

{( )

A N

U I

S T

' \

C NR OO N

I N

I

(

M M S TI EP

'l A

'l A TR E S S

R I

'A R E Y S

' ' A G WL N OA

' A

- I PN 8 D TY A N 2 A NE Y N O - E fA -

/ I T

C 3.

8 P R E M:L_ET A F 7 't E S E G VA

_ S NR S Y s ~ E E A RL AE L UB RA VA R 1 G A R EIN T E I

FC ABF T

OE O Tl N YS ' x AS RA TL

- C S -

AN EO RN

'[b A O GT N E I

1 D

AS ES RA A+ +A PL Y SC A W

E E L C A

B R Y A E W A C 1 Y E N

I N A SA SC M I W AR "1 E E L T C A

CE T R

C E N RT S V N S O EAD AL I

C

Y SN SU C A ADN R

- - LEO T v-

_A-

. ~ ,

D CR N N - - -

EABN G

I E

T N E O N

I I

M L

'l 3b

/

2 O T I

N U T fs NR OO N TI EP O A I

TR T S S

'l N_ A RS I

. R EY IM_

~ ' A A

P WL OA A E PN N

9 S TY A N O 2 E NE Y

/

fA I T

C 3. p L

BE M:L_

A F T

E E 8 AEV A S TG Y  % E P NRS A '

i N_ R U

E AEV AL R MI G CR A N T

I CREI F AABF OE I Tl E YS T O s AS N

RA TL

- C S -

AN EO O RN A

GT O

N E I

1 D

AS ES RA A+ +A PL Y SC A E I W

E L E , C B T A O R Y A N C EA l W E

N Y I

N A SC M W AR SA

'l E L C CE R A I E

RT V N S S O EA A 1 C D t SNc SU Y

A ADN h LEO T

%'v -

A

~

D CRN N - - -

EA0u G

I E

T E O L N O

2 TI N

U T

. \ NR OO N N I I I P Ml6 M N T A E

'l 'j O I

T R S

T SI A RS R E Y

. ' A WL

' A P OA

// /

A

- E PN S TY A

/ A N

O 0

3 E NE Y L EL T fN /

f_C TI 3 B MLA E AE VA F

'/ 'p ~S E

8 TG Y s

~ E P NR S A R U

E AEV AL R G CR A N T 1 I CREI E F AABF O T O

T E 1 N Y S . N AS RA T L

- C S

AO

_ ET R

A E 1 GS N S I

DA AL E C- A+ +A R

PN Y SO A N W E E L C A

B R Y A

C EA I W Y E N A SA SC I

M A W AR I

'l E E L

_ T C A

CE R O

I E

e N RT N S S V O

EAD AL 1

C SN C Y L

S U A

_. ADN R

~ LEO T x

v_-

- N~

~

NI D CRN N - - -

EABN G

E L

I E

T O

N v M 1

2 s )

~ ._ TI

\ N U

- T f\ NR OO N TI EP O A I

TR T S S

N A R I

S R E Y

- 'I IM_ " A WL

- A P OA A

- E PN 1 STYA N 3 E NE Y fy A

fT _

O I

C E

8

- EL T

3. p LB ML E A E VAF T G A

_ ~S Y s _

~ E P NR S A 'N i I R

U E A E VA L R M_ G CR A N T .

I CREI F AABF O

T E1 I

E T

Y S O . x A S N RA T L

- C S

AO ET R

G A El GS INS DA AL E C- AM +A R

PN Y SO A E N I W

E L E ,

C A

B T O R Y A

C EA I W Y E N A SA SC MI A W "1 E AR L

C A

CE R I

E RT V N S S O EAD AL I

C SN C Y S U A ADN R leo T

_ N m, D CRn N - - -

EABN I

E G T E O L N

O O O .

GENERAL PLANT AREAS TRAY TO TRAY-PERPENDICULAR CROSSING CLASS lE TO REDUNDANT CLASS IE A --* l* MIN *-- ~ l' MIN.

. i U NOTE 1 g= y,g NOTE 2 (TYPICAL)

I" MIN.

NOTEI O s . . .

d

[ [

OR B

&A ' '

LEGEND A-CLASS IE RACEWAY l' MIN +-- - l' MIN. *-- B-REDUNDANT CLASS IE RACEWAY

. -el! s N- NON-CLASS IE RACEWAY NOTES: 1. TR AY COVER

2. VERTICAL SPACING DISTANCE FOR CABLE INOTE 1 TRAYS IS MEASURED FROM THE TOP OF I~ MIN- THE SIDE RAll OF THE LOWER TRAY TO THE BOTTOM OF THE SIDE RAll OF THE UPPER TRAY B

FIGURE 8.3 -32 SECTION A- A GENERAL PLANT AREAS (GPA)

ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION ARRANGEMENTS BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 -

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

m ,

U U .

GENERAL PLANT AREAS TRAY TO TRAY-PERPENDICULAR CROSSING CLASS 1E TO NON-CLASS 1E A -* l' MIN *-- --= l' MIN. ~

e e 1'

^

t NOTE 1 a l ,

g MIN NOTE 2 (TYPICAL)

NOTEI

[ N [" g ,

k . .

[ [

OR N hA ' '

LEGEND A-CLASS IE RACEWAY

--+ 1* MIN e-- - 1* MIN. -

B-REDUNDANT CLASS IE RACEWAY

. s N- NON-CLASS IE RACEWAY

, NOTES: 1. TRAY COVER

2. VERTICAL SPACING DISTANCE FOR CABLE

[ NOTE 1 TRAYS IS MEASURED FROM THE TOP OF I~ "IN- THE SIDE RAll OF THE LOWER TRAY TO THE SOTTOM OF THE SIDE RAll OF THE UPPER TRAY FIGURE 8.3-33 SECTION A- A GENERAL PLANT AREAS (GPA)

ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION ARRANGEMENTS BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

O O O .

GENERAL PLANT AREAS TRAY TO TRAY-PERPENDICULAR CROSSING NON-CLASS 1E TO CL ASS IE l

&A -* 1* MIN. *-- --+ t' MIN. *--

N 1 e i NOTE 1 pMIN.

NOTE 2 (TYPICAL) s s NOTE 1 A [, g ,

k ,

[ [

! OR A

&A ' ,-

LEGEND A-CLASS IE RACEWAY 1 MIN --+. 1* MIN. +-- B-REDUNDANT CLASS IE RACEWAY i , s N-NON-CLASS IE RACEWAY l [

N

[ "

NOTES: 1. TR AY COVER

2. VERTICAL SPACING DISTANCE FOR CABLE fNOTE 1 TRAYS IS MEASURED FROM THE TOP OF 1"M IN. THE SIDE RAll OF THE LOWER TRAY TO THE BOTTOM OF THE SIDE RAll OF THE UPPER TRAY d

I A FIGURE 8.3 -34 SECTION A- A GENERAL PLANT AREAS (GPA)

ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION j ARRANGEMENTS BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT i

1 CABLE SPREADING AREAS l TRAY TO TRAY-PERPENDICULAR CROSSING CLASS IE TO REDUNDANT CLASS 1E A --* 1* MIN *-- -+ 1 MIN +---

e e

^

t NOTEI I l ,

j= MIN i NOTE 2 (TYPICAL) 1,, MIN.

NOTEI

[

/ B g k . .

hA OR [

B

[

s LEGEND A-CLASS IE RACEWAY

--+

1 MIN .-- -- t* MIN. +-- B-REDUNDANT CLASS IE RACEWAY l s N- NON-CLASS IE RACEWAY l A

f n NOTES: 1. TR AY COVER

2. VERTICAL SPACING DISTANCE FOR CABLE fNOTEI TRAYS IS MEASURED FROM THE TOP OF
3. MIN THE SIDE RAll OF THE LOWER TRAY TO l

THE BOTTOM OF THE SIDE RAll OF THE l UPPER TRAY B

FIGURE 8.3 -35 l SECTION A- A CABLE SPREADING AREAS (CSA)

ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION ARRANGEMENTS BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT I

O -

O O .

CABLE SPREADING AREAS TRAY TO TRAY-PERPENDICULAR CROSSING CLASS 1E TO NON-CLASS 1E A -w 1* MIN. *--- --* l' MIN. --

' ' " ~

l A NOTEI l y= MIN NOTE 2 (TYPICAL)

' ' 1" MIN.

o -NOTEI

[ N [ g

[

4* A OR N

[.

LEGEND A-CLASS IE RACEWAY

--* l' MIN +--- -= 1' MIN. ---

B-REDONDo*3T CLASS IE RACEWAY

, s N- NON-CLASS IE RACEWAY A

[ NOTES: 1. TRAY COVER

2. VERTICAL SPACING DISTANCE FOR CA8LE NOTE 1 TRAYS IS MEASURED FROM THE TOP OF 1 ". M IN. THE SIDE RAll OF THE LOWER TRAY TO THE BOTTOM OF THE SIDE RAll OF THE UPPER TRAY d

N FIGURE 8.3 -36 SECTION A- A CABLE SPREADING AREAS (CSA)

ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION -

ARRANGEMENTS BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

f~  ;,-

V v -C) .-

CABLE SPREADING AREAS TRAY TO TRAY-PERPENDICULAR CROSSING NON-CLASS 1E TO CLASS 1E I

+A -= 1* MIN. * ---- l' MIN. *--

N ,

e a u

. 'r NOTEI 1" MIN NOTE 2 (TYPICAL) s s 1" MIN.

A

[" g ,

k , .

4> A OR f A

f l

l LEGEND l A-CLASS IE RACEWAY I

,. g g _ ,. _

B-REDUNDANT CLASS 1E RACEWAY N- NON-CLASS IE RACEWAY

[

s N

[ " NOTES: 1. TR AY COVER

2. VERTICAL SPACING DISTANCE FOR CABLE

[ NOTE 1 TRAYS IS MEASURED'FROM THE TOP OF 1" uis.

THE SIDE RAIL OF THE LOWER TRAY TO THE BOTTOM OF THE SIDE RAll OF THE d UPPER TRAY FIGURE 8.3 -37 SECTION A- A CABLE SPREADING AREAS (CSA) .

ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION ARRANGEMENTS BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

, ff. f's.

( '~ .'*

GENERAL PLANT AREAS-TRAY TO CONDUlT CLASS IE TO REDUNDANT CLASS lE i

l CONDUlT

^

IJ 1 MIN.

_ , _ - O 1" MIN.

OI e t

1" MIN.

t RM B

I f

' TRAY CONDUlT DETAll "A" DETAll "B " DETAll"C" i

l 1

j LEGEND FIGUR E 8.3-38 j A - CLASS lE RACEW AY

~

" ^ ^ GENERAL PLANT AREAS (GPA)

! N YON CLSS IE R CE AY ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION ARRANGEMENTS l

BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 4

l-

.~-

GENERAL PLANT AREAS-TRAY TO CONDUlT CLASS lE TO NON-CLASS lE I

CONDUlT

" A l N l TRAY ,

CONDUlT 1= MIN. 1" ugy, g=

MIN. T "A*

N N f

TRAY 4

CO NDUlT"/

j i

D ETAll "A" D ETA ll "B" DETAIL "C" i

1 I

N i

LEGEND FIGUR E 8.3-39 A - CLAS5 IE RACEW AY 8 - REDUNDANT C LASS IE RACEWAY GENERAL PLANT AREAS (GPA)

N - NON CLASS 1E R ACE %AY ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION i ARRANGEMENTS l BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 FINAL S AFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 4

O O O :.

GENER AL PL ANT AREAS-TRAY TO CONDUlT NON-CLASS lE TO CLASS lE CONDUlT TRAY .,

CONDulT 1 MIN. 1,, MIN. 1" MIN.

TRAY p A a A l CONDUlT DETAIL "A" DETAIL "B" D ETAll "C" LEGEND FIGURE 8.3-40

~

0 - RE UNDANT CLAS S lE RACEWAY N - NON CLASS lE R ACEWAY ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION ARRANGEMENTS BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

e .-

O O O, -

CABLE SPREADING AREAS-TRAY TO CONDUIT CLASS lE TO REDUNDANT CL ASS 1E CONDulT TRAY '

I" MIN. l' MIN. 1" MIN.

O TRAY t a t CONDUlij TRAY DETAll "A" D ETAll "B" D ETAIL "C" LEGEND FIGUR E 8.3-41 B - HED 4 DANT CLASS lE RACEWAY N - NON CLASS IE RACEWAY ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION ARRANGEMENTS BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

~

R 2 -

/- s Q k ,, e' CABLE SPREADING AREAS-TRAY TO CONDUlT CLASS lE TO NON-CLASS lE TRAY # l p  % TRAY 1" MIN. CONDulT M N. i,

--* MIN. -

N N CONDulT TRAY #

l

, D ETAll "A" DETAIL "B" DETAIL "C "

i i

?

I a

FIGURE 8.3-42 LEGEND CABLE SPREADING AREAS (CSA)

, A- CLASS 1E R ACEWAY ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION B- RdDUNDANT CLASS 1E RACEWAY ARRANGEMENTS N - NON-CLASS 1E RACEWAY BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2

! FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT I es - i

I i

s .p ,e s

'E CABLE SPREADING AREAS-TRAY TO CONDUIT NON-CLASS IE TO CLASS 1E i

'1 4

N A-CONDUIT }  % TRAY 1" MIN. CONDU!T I" MIN.

  • MIN. *---

A A 1

CONDulT TRAY " -

i 1

i l

! D E Tall "A" DETAll "8 DETAIL "C"

}

l FIGURE 8.3-43 A

LEGEND CABLE SPREADING AREAS (CSA)

A- CLASS TE RACEWAY ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION B- REDUNDANT CLASS lE RACEWAY ARRANGEMENTS j N - NON-CLASS IE RACEWAY BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 j FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT i

im /s-

+

, s._

a GENERAL PLANT AREAS CABLE IN AIR TO CABLE IN AIR CLASS IE TO REDUNDANT CLASS 1E

?

VERTICAL HORIZONTAL A A 1 O OO O A B l O I' 1' CABLES 1" MIN. 1 " MIN. OO OO (T V PICAL) ~ '

O

  • I MIN. ~

O o

B B NOTE 1 (TYPICAL) DETAIL "C" OR l D ETAll "A" OR DETAIL "B" A B O O OO '

OO LEGEND:

A- CLASS lE R ACEWAY/ CABLES *- I" MIN. e-B -REDUNDANT CLASS lE RACEWAY / CABLES N-NON-CLASS 1E RACEWAY / CABLES D E Tall "D',

NOTE FIGURE 8.3-44

1. CABLES IN AIR ARE ENCLOSED IN METALLIC GENERAL PLANT AREAS (GPA)

CONDUIT OR A PROTECTIVE WRAP OF WOVEN SILICON DIOXIDE AND GLASS TAPE. ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION ARRANGEMENTS i

BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 1

4 .

~ m ...

GENERAL PLANT AREAS

] CABLE IN AIR TO CABLE IN AIR CLASS 1E TO REDUNDANT CLASS lE HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL i

NOTE i (TYPICAL)

A

~

O g l CABLES 0" MIN.

l (TY PICAL) 8 o

l D ETAll " A" i,

I d LEGEND A - CL ASS 1E R ACEWAY/ CABLES B - REDUNDANT CLASS 1E RACEWAY / CABLES FIGURE 8.3- 4 5 i N -NON-CLASS 1E RACEWAY / CABLES GENERAL PLANT AREAS (GPA) t ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION l NOTE 1: CABLES IN A!R ARE ENCLOSED IN A PROTECTIVE WRAP OF WOVEN ' BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2

SILLCON DIOXtDE AND GLASS TAPE. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT l

1 4

r ._

. .- . - . . . ~. ._

m .e, GENERAL PLANT AREAS CABLE IN AIR TO CABLE IN AIR 4

CLASS 1E TO NON-CLASS 1E 1

i A N i O A O 00 N o o o

- 1 1- O OO I CABLES j

(TYPICAL) di OO o O O I

N A

~ '""'"-

] NOTE 1 (TYPICAL) i i D ETAll "A" DETAIL "B" D ETAll "C" I

LEGEND.

A- CLASS lE R ACEWAY/ CABLES B -REDUNDANT CLASS 1E RACEWAY / CABLES N-NON-CLASS 1E RACEWAY / CABLES l NOTE FIGURE 8.3-46 i 1. CABLES IN AIR ARE ENCLOSED IN METALLIC GENERAL PLANT AREAS (GPA)

CONDulT OR A P8tOTECTIVE WRAP OF WOVEN SIUCON DIOXIDE AND GLASS TAPE. ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION 4

ARRANGEMENTS I BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT i

i l

O O O .

CABLE SPREADING AREAS i

i CABLE IN AIR TO CA3LE IN AIR ft <

1 I CLASS 1E TO NON-CLASS 1E t

l  !

i 1

! A N i O A e OO N l

o o u l CABLES

- 0 00  !

(T Y PIC AL) 4, i

- O IN. ~  !

l N A j NOTE 1 (TYPICAL)

D ETAll "A" DETAIL "B" D ETAIL "C" 4

! LEGEND- '

A- CLASS lE R ACEWAY/ CABLES j B-REDUNDANT CLASS tE RACEWAY / CABLES l N-NON-CLASS 1E RACEWAY / CABLES '

NOTE FIGURE 8.3-47

1. CABLES IN AIR ARE ENCLOSED IN A CABLE SPREADING AREAS (CSA) t PROTECTIVE WRAP OF WOVEN StLICON 3

1 DIOXtDE AND GLASS TAPE ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION i

E ARRANGEMENTS

, BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 ['

i FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT i

i 1

I

GENERAL FLANT AREAS CABLE IN AIR TO CABLE IN AIR NON-CLASS 1E TO CLASS 1E N A O

O 00 N

" " A  :

O

. O OO CABLES (TY PICAL) O OO o O O A O N --* 1" MIN. *---

NOTE i (TYPICAL)

D ETAll ."A" DETAIL'"B" D ETAIL "C" LEGEND:

A CLASS tE R ACEWAY/ CABLES B -REDUNDANT CLASS 1E RACEWAY / CABLES N-NON-CLASS 1E RACEWAY / CABLES NOTE FIGURE 8.3-48 l

1. CABLES IN AIR ARE ENCLOSED IN METALLIC GENERAL PLANT AREAS (GPA)

SSL($'N DlOX DE N LASS TAP . ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION ARRANGEMENTS BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

~ - - - _ - - - - _ . - _ . - . . - - . _ . -.

7, -s g .

V. V -

+

GENERAL PLANT AREAS CABLE IN AIR TO CABLE IN AIR i

j NON-CLASS IE TO CLASS IE s

i i N A i

' O O OO O " A N

" O O 0" min.

i CABLES O' M IN. O OO (T Y PIC AL)

OO

! O O l

A O ~ 0" M I N.

  • N j NOTE 1 (TYPICAL) i D ETAll "A" DETAIL "B" D ETAIL "C" i i

i j LEGENC:

A- CLASS f E R ACEWAY/CASLES B -REDUNDANT CLASS 1E RACEWAY / CABLES N-NON-CLASS 1E RACEWAY / CABLES NOTE FIGURE 8.3-49 A

1. CABLES IN AIR ARE ENCLOSED IN A

' N SILICON GENERAL PLANT AREAS (GPA)

Df0XIDE AND GLAS TAPE. ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION ARRANGEMENTS BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 1

C 7- -

V U .

CABLE SPREADING AREAS CABLE IN AIR TO CABLE IN AIR l

CLASS lE'TO ' REDUNDANT CLASS 1E OO A A

--o- 1" M I N, *--

O OO O

B ES I~ "'"- '" "'"- D ETAI L "C" (TYPICAL) h OO o OR O A B 0 8 0 O NOTE 1 (TYPICAL) 00 DETAIL "A" OR DETAIL "B"

- I"M IN . .---

LEGEND:

A- CLASS 1E R ACEWAY/ CABLES B-REDU? DANT CLASS 1E RACEWAY / CABLES N-NCN-CLASS 1E RACEWAY / CABLES NOTE FIGURE 8.3-50

1. CABLES IN AIR ARE ENCLOSED IN METALLIC CABLE SPREADING AREAS (CSA)

$ti!:ON DlO IDE $NNL[SS T[PE ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION ARRANGEMENTS BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT ,

. (' ('~~'

~

~ N m ,-

~

l l CABLE SPREADING AREAS CABLE IN AIR TO CABLE IN AIR CLASS lE TO REDUNDANT CLASS IE HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL NOTE I (TYPICAL)

A l O l O l f

CABLES 0" MIN.

B LEGEND A - CLASS IE R ACEWAY/ CABLES B -REDUNDANT CLASS IE RACEWAY / CABLES FIGURE 8.3-51 N - NON-CLASS IE RACEWAY / CABLES CABLE SPPEADING AREAS (CSA)

ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION NOTE D CABLES IN AIR ARE ENCLOSED IN A ARRANGEMENT PROTECTIVE WRAP OF WCVEN BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 StuCON DIOXICE AND GLASS TAPE. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

---,--:. ' , - - - --7, -.

O O O .

h CABLE SPREADING AREAS 4

CABLE IN AIR TO CABLE IN AIR l

!, CLASS 1E TO NON-CLASS 1E 1

l i

I A N O A j O 00 N CABLES j (TYPICAL) di OO ik j O O

' "I"~

I N A j NOTE 1 (TYPICAL)

D ETAll "A" DETAIL "B" DETAI L "C" I

LEGEND:

]

i A- CLASS IE RACEWAY / CABLES B -REDUNDANT CLASS 1E RACEWAY / CABLES

} N-NON-CLASS 1E RACEWAY / CABLES l NOTE FIGURE 8.3-52 li 1. CABLES IN AIR ARE ENCLOSED IN METALLIC CABLE SPREADING AREAS (CSA)

CONDU!T OR A PROTECTIVE WRAP OF WOVEN ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION

! StucON oiOxtDE AND GLASS TAPE.

ARRANGEMENTS BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 l FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT l

i

O p r's N.) ) =

CABLE SPREADING AREAS CABLE IN AIR TO CABLE IN AIR ~

CLASS 1E TO NON-CLASS 1E A N O #

O 00 N O P 0" MIN. O CABLES (TYPICAL) il OO O O N NOTE 1 (TYPICAL)

D ETAll "A" DETAIL "B" DETAIL "C" LEGEND:

A- CLASS tE R ACEWAY/ CABLES B -REDUNDANT CLASS tE RACEWAY / CABLES N-NON-CLASS 1E RACEWAY / CABLES NOTE FIGURE 8.3-53

1. CABLES IN AIR ARE ENCLOSED IN A CABLE SPREADING AREAS (CSA)

PROTECTIVE WRAP OF WOVEN S!LICON DIOXIDE AND GLASS TAPE. ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION S

BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

- n.

d u a .

CABLE SPREADING AREAS CABLE IN AIR TO CABLE IN AIR NON-C8. *.30 **' TO CLASS 1E N A O

O OO

" " A N O

CABLES

- 1 OO (TYPICAL) j, gg g O O NOTE 1 (TYPICAL)

D ETAI L "A" DETAll"B" D ETAIL "C" LEGEND:

A- CLASS 1E R ACEWAY/ CABLES B-REDUNDANT CLASS 1E RACEWAY / CABLES N-NON-CLASS 1E RACEWAY / CABLES NOTE FIGURE 8.3-54

1. CABLES IN AIR ARE ENCLOSED IN METALLIC CABLE SPREADING AREAS (CSA)

CONDUIT OR A PROTECTIVE WRAP OF WOVEN SILICON DIOXIDE AND GLASS TAPE. ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION ARRANGEMENTS BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

i O O O -

CABLE SPREADING AREAS CABLE IN AIR TO CABLE IN AIR NON-CLASS IE TO CLASS 1E l

l N A O

O 00 N 4, A O L O IN.

MI - 0O OO CABLES _

I' -

(T Y PIC AL) j, 0

NOTE 1 (TYPICAL)

D ETAIL "A" DETAll"B" DETAIL "C" LEGEND:

A- CLASS 1E RACEWAY / CABLES B-REDUNDANT CLASS 1E RACEWAY / CABLES N-NON-CLASS 1E RACEWAY / CABLES

~

I NOTE l 1. CABLES IN AIR ARE Et4 CLOSED IN A CABLE SPREADING AREAS (CSA)

PROTECTIVE WRAP OF WOVEN ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION SILICON DIOXtDE AND GLASS TAPE.

RMEEUS BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT I

i

O O O

~

GENERAL PLANT AREAS TRAY TO TRAY-CABLE ENTRY / EXIT CLASS lE TO REDUNDANT CLASS lE l

T CONDutT " A

~

A / "

TRAY l

CABLE y= MtN. NOTE 2 h ,,

TRAY "

[ B

[

l LEGEND

! A-CLASS IE RACEWAY l B-REDUNDANT CLASS IE RACEWAY l N- NON-CLASS IE RACEWAY FIGURE 8.3-56 l

N TES: T GENERAL PLANT AREAS (GPA)

V I ACING OtSTANCE FOR CABLE ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION TRAYS IS MEASURED FROM THE TOP OF ARRANGEMENT THE SIDE RAIL OF THE LOWER TRAY TO BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 l THE BOTTOM OF THE SIDE RAIL OF THE FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UPPER TRAY l

O O O -

GENERAL PLANT AREAS TRAY TO TRAY-CABLE ENTRY / EXIT CLASS 1E TO REDUNDANT CLASS 1E 1

CONDUIT" A LEGEND: ___

A-CLASS IE RACEWAY B-REDUNDANT CLASS IE RACEWAY

/

g-A ~~~

/ ii N-NON-CLASS IE RACEWAY Q CABLE

" i NOTE 3 NOTE 2 O MIN.

NOTES

1. TRAY COVER '

NOTE Ig

[

2. VERTICAL SPACING DISTANCE FOR O CABLE TRAYS IS MEASURE 3 FROM THE TOP OF THE SIDE RAll OF THE LOWER TRAY TO THE BOTTOM OF TRAY SIDE RA!L OF THE UPPER TRAY
3. CABLES IN AIR ARE ENCLOSED IN A PROTECTIVE WRAP OF WOVEN SILICON DIOXIDE AND GLASS TAPE.

GENERAL PLANT AREAS (GPA)

ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION ARRANGEMENT BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 .

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSid REPORT

[y f'm ,-

\ ( .

GENERAL PLANT AREAS TRAY TO TRAY-CABLE ENTRY / EXIT CLASS 1E TO NON-CLASS 1E 1

CONDUIT" A

~

/ A f "

TRAY CABLE

y. MIN. NOTE 2 JTE I g

} 1r TRAY '

f N (

LEGEND A-CLASS IE RACEWAY l B-REDUNDANT CLASS IE RACEWAY N- NON-CLASS IE R ACEWAY FIGURE 8.3- 58 N TES: TR GENERAL PLANT AREAS (GPA)

E TI ACING DISTANCE FOR CABLE ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION TRAYS IS MEASURED FROM THE TCP OF ARRANGEMENT THE SICE RAll CF THE LOWER TRAY TO BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 THE SOTTOM OF THE SIDE RAtt OF THE FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UPPER TRAY I

- -_ ~. . .

,3

,, p ,--

e GENERAL PLANT AREAS TRAY TO TRAY-CABLE ENTRY / EXIT CLASS 1E TO NON-CLASS 1E 1

CONDUlT" A f A l TRAY CABLE NOTE 3

O' MIN.

. p TRAY '

f N (

l LEGEND l A-CLASS IE RACEWAY l B-REDUNDANT CLASS IE RACEWAY N-NON-CLASS IE RACEWAY FIGURE 8.3-59 NOTES: 1. TRAY cover GENERAL PLANT AREAS (GPA)

2. VERTICAL SPACING DISTANCE FOR CABLE TRAYS IS ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION MEASURED FROM TH'E TOP OF THE SIDE RAIL OF THE ARRANGEMENT LOWER TRAY TO THE BOTTOM OF THE SIDE RAIL OF THE BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 UPPER TRAY FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
3. CABLES IN AIR ARE ENCLOSED IN A PROTECTIVE WRAP OF WOVEN SILICON DICXIDE AND GLASS TAPE

1

,~

O

  • GENERAL PLANT AREAS TRAY TO TRAY-CABLE ENTRY / EXIT NON-CLASS 1E TO CLASS lE 1

Cote 0UIT" N

~~~

/ N f TRAY t k NOTE 2 1" min.

b n

/ ^ d TRAY '

LEGEND A-CLASS IE RACEWAY B-REDUNDANT CLASS IE RACEWAY FIGURE 8.3-60 -

N-NON-CLASS IE RACEWAY GENERAL PLANT AREAS (GPA)

NOTES: 1. TR AY COVER ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION

2. VERTICAL SPACING DISTANCE FOR CABLE ARRANK E NT TRAYS IS MEASURED FRCM THE TCP OF N ELEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 THE SICE RAIL CF THE LOWER TRAY TO FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT THE BOTTOM CF THE SIDE RAIL CF THE UPPER TRAY

n , ._ s ]

GENERAL PLANT AREAS TRAY TO TRAY-CABLE ENTRY / EXIT NON-CLASS 1E TO CLASS 1E 1

COesOutT" N TRAY caar s-d i NOTE 3 o~ ansn.

asoir 1g j o TRAY '

LEGEND A-CLASS IE RACEWAY S-RECUNDAhT CLASS IE RACEWAY FIGURE 8.3-61 N- NCM-CLASS IE RACEWAY GENERAL PLANT AREAS (GPA)

NOTES: 1. TR AY CCVER 1 VERTICAL SPACING CISTANCE FOR CABLE TRAYS IS MEASURED FROM ARRANGEMENT THE TCP OFTHE SIDE R AIL OF THE LCWER TRAY TO THE BOTTCM CF M MLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 THE SICE R AIL OF THE UPPER TRAY FINAL SAFETY AssALYSIS REPORT 3 CABLES IN AIR ARE ENCLOSED IN A PROTECTIVE WR AP CF WCVEN SILICCN DICXIDE AND GLASS TAPE.

w_ _____ - ____ - - - __ _

7

('

G \,_) Q) -

CABLE SPREADING AREAS TRAY TO TRAY- CABLE ENTRY / EXIT "

m CLASS lE TO REDUNDANT CLASS 1E - - .

',I,s  ;

s i

CONDUIT " .

~

( ,

-/

TRAY #

[' A [ ' '

~

NOTE 2

3. ,

NOTEI g $

_ u TRAY "

[ B [

LEGEND A-CLASS IE RACEWAY 8-REDUNDANT CLASS IE RACEWAY FIGURE 8.3-62 N- NON-CLASS IE RACEWAY CABLE SPREADING AREAS (CSA)

NOTES: 1. TRAY COVER ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION

2. VERTICAL SPACING DISTANCE FOR CA8LE ARRANGEMENT TRAYS IS MEASURED FROM THE TOP OF BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 THE SIDE RAIL OF THE LOWER TRAY TO FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT THE BOTTOM OF THE StDE MAIL OF THE UPPER TRAY

CABLE SPREADING AREAS TRAY TO TRAY- CABLE ENTRY / EXIT CLASS 1E TO REDUNDANT CLASS 1E l

l 1

CONDUIT #

A A

[

TRAY h

NOTE 5 i 0" MIN.

LEGEND:

A-CLASS IE RACEWAY '

TEI g g B-REDUNDANT CLASS 1E RACEWAY M-NON-CLASS 1E RACEWAY B ['

TRAY

! NOTES

! 1. TRAY COVER

2. VERTICAL SPACING DISTANCE FOR CABLE TRAYS IS MEASURED FROM THE TCP OF THE SIDE RAIL OF FIGURE 8.3-63 THE LOWER TRAY TO THE BOTTOM CABLE SPREADING AREAS (CSA)

HE SIDE RAll OF THE UPPER ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION

3. CABLES IN AIR ARE EhCLOSED IN A PROTECTIVE WRAP CF WOVEN SILICON BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 DIOXIDE AND GLASS TAPE. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

O O O .

CABLE SPREAD!NG AREAS TRAY TO TRAY- CABLE ENTRY / EXIT CLASS 1E TO NON-CLASS 1E l

l CONDUlT "

l A 1

[ A [

CABLE g 1" MIN.

N TE1 g f

TRAY #

[ N [

LEGEND A-CLASS IE RACEWAY B-REDUNDANT CLASS lE RACEWAY FIGURE 8.3-64 N- NON-CLASS IE RACEWAY CABLE SPREADING AREAS (CSA)

NOTES: 1. TR AY COVER ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION

2. VERTICAL SPACING DISTANCE FOR CABLE ARRANGEMENT )

TRAYS IS MEASURED FROM THE TOP OF BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 THE SIDE RAll OF THE LOWER TRAY TO FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT THC 57TTOM OF THE SIDE RAll OF THE UPPER TRAY

O O Q .

CABLE SPREADING AREAS TRAY TO TRAY- CABLE ENTRY / EXIT Cl, ASS 1E TO NON-CLASS IE 1

CONDUlT "

A A

[

LEGEND: TRAY CABLE '

A-CLASS IE RACEWAY NOTE 3 B-REDUNDANT CLASS 1E RACEWAY NOTE 2 O MIN.

N-NON-CLASS 1E RACEWAY NOTES

1. TRAY COVER [

M N M

[

2. VERTICAL SPACING DISTANCE FOR CABLE TRAYS IS MEASURED FROM TRAY THE TOP OF THE SIDE RAll OF THE LOWER TRAY TO THE BOTTOM OF THE SIDE RAll OF THE UPPER TRAY.
3. CABLES IN AIR ARE ENCLOSED IN A PROTECTIVE WRAP OF WOVEN SILICON DIOX1DE AND GLASS TAPE. FIGURE 8.3-65 CABLE SPREADING AREAS (CSA)

ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION ARRANGEMENT BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

CABLE SPREADING AREAS TRAY TO TRAY - CABLE ENTRY / EXIT NON-CLASS 1E TO CLASS 1E 1

CONDUlT#

N

"~

TRAY #

CABLE o

., NOTE 2 NOTEt) . u TRAY -

[' A

[

LEGEND A-CLASS IE RACEWAY B-REDUNDANT CLASS 1E RACEWAY N- NON-CLASS IE RACEWAY FIGURE 8.3-66 CABLE SPREADING AREAS (CSA)

. VE TICAL SPACING DISTANCE FOR CABLE TRAYS IS MEASURED FROM THE TOP OF ARRANGEMEN i THE SIDE RAll OF THE LOWER TRAY TO BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 THE BOTTOM OF THE SIDE RAll OF THE FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UPPER TRAY

4 I

CABLE SPREADING AREAS TRAY TO TRAY - CABLE ENTRY / EXIT NON-CLASS IE TO CLASS 1E i

4 4

i i

l CONDUlT#

N

(

LEGEND: ___

A-CLASS IE RACEWAY B-REDUNDANT CLASS 1E RACEWAY TRAY CABLE

, N-NON-CLASS 1E RACEWAY NOTE 3 O MIN 4

j NOTES

1. TR AY COVER NOTE 1 3 f "

? 2. VERTICAL SPACING DISTANCE FOR A j CABLE TRAYS IS MEASURED FROM

! THE TOP OF THE SIDE RAIL OF THE LOWER TRAY TO THE BOTTOM OF THE TRAY

]' SIDE RAll OF THE UPPER TRAY.

! 3. CABLES IN AIR ARE ENCLOSED IN A PROTECTIVE WRAP OF WOVEN SILICON DIOXIDE AND GLASS TAPE.

FIGURE 8.3-67 i

CABLE SPREADING AREAS (CSA)

ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION ARRANGEMENT

] BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2

, FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT i

~s -.

) ,

) .'e i

GENERAL PLANT AREAS CABLE IN AIR TO CONDUlT CLASS 1E TO REDUNDANT CLASS 1E HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL

^ O k

CABLES fO j= MIN.

.6 B

CONDUIT i (TYPICAL)

DETAIL"A" LEGEND A - CLASS 1E RACEWAY / CABLES B - REDUNDANT CLASS IE RACEWAY / CABLES FIGURE 8.3-68 N -NON CLASS 1E RACEWAY / CABLES GENERAL PLANT AREAS-(GPA)

ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION ARRANGEMENTS BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

O O O .

GENERAL PLANT AREAS CABLE IN AIR TO CONDUIT l CLASS 1E TO NON-CLASS IE NON-CLASS IE TO CLASS IE HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL I

I

! A N O O I

4

? CABLES fO ,,

o CABLES fO .

! t i

N A I CONDUIT CONDUIT i

i i

DET All"A" DET AIL "B" i

i l LEGEND j A - CLASS 1E RACEWAY / CABLES B - REDUNDANT CLASS lE RACEWAY / CABLES FIGURE 8.3-69 l

N -NON CLASS 1E RACEWAY / CABLES GENERAL PLANT AREAS (GPA)

ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION l

ARRANGEMENTS x BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 I

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT I

i

'= .

2 h/

Y

)

A T

I N

U S -

C NT

( OR N I O S T AI O A P E ET T S R RA AR RI S A ES GP WY O L N E P AN I

DST YA 0 A 7E EL N E Y ELT 3.- R BML E 8SP AT EA G F V A EEP NRS RLEAE LV A U

G BCR A I ACREIN FCAABF E

I S

S T S AUl A L .

ED C L

A N

RN T C It AO N I

T GC A R E

N O D V I

N DT U R O A O O EI R D

i E L RA R A T

P O N ^ B S NI T O Z

/

S T

l I U EE E R O

E L

D N

LL I S H B O B B S A C AA A C

CC L S E

C L B

A C

/ S Y E A L S WB E E A L C C B A /

A R YA CEW

/ I E

Y A S C S A W

E L AR C

A C E I R T S N S E A l

D L A

S N C S U -

A D N D L E O N C R N E - - -

G A B N E

L i

O O O -

CABLE SPREADING AREAS CABLE IN AIR TO CONDUlT l CLASS 1E TO NON-CLASS 1E I

l A

l o N OO u

N A j 1" MIN. 0

. C A B LE S 1" MIN.

00 (TYPICAL) JL OO b N A O -. 1" MIN. *---

CONDUIT D ETAll " A" DETAIL "B" DETAll "C" l

LEGEN D:

A- CLASS 1E R ACE WAY/C ABLES FIGURE 8.3 -71

B- REDUNDANT CLASS 1E RACEWAY / CABLES N - NON-CLASS 1E R ACE WAY/ CABLES CABLE SPREADING AREAS (CSA)

ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION ARRANGEMENTS

, BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

O O O .

s CABLE SPREADING AREAS CABLE IN AIR TO CONDUlT NON-CLASS lE TO CLASS 1E N A O

OO '

u A N CABLES 1" MIN.

(TYPICAL) n OO b O --. 1" MIN.

  • CONDUlTS D ETAll " A" DETAll "B" D ETAll "C" LEGEN D:

A- CLASS 1E RACEWAY / CABLES FIGURE 8.3 -72 B- REDUNDANT CLASS 1E RACEWAY / CABLES CABLE SPREADING AREAS (CSA)

N- NON-CLASS IE' RACEWAY / CABLES ACCEPTABLE SEPARATION ARRANGEMENTS BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION-UNIT 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

1 3 2

T O R I

N T U R NO E OP D I E D

D A

RT R EA ES LY T S R) A VS S O RS I

I ES DR AVT R C A T ROA E Y D CH DE YW AL IY .

N L AO LA P O AB RPN A OR TA 3TY ST( T SC 7 EY

-T LT ALE 3.

B H A F

- VA E D RS R E E L

- U SVA GA A I

- I EI N

_ FRBF

_ E L

_ B AD

_ CE L

HL

_ ICA H T S

_ WN O _

O I TE T

I Y B

Y L

N MA O

_ LM I

S

_ Y A

_ R T

X

_ E C

,I{

I 2 u o .jil U S

_O

.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20129G797&oldid=2888067"