ML20129D192
| ML20129D192 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley |
| Issue date: | 06/26/1985 |
| From: | Carey J DUQUESNE LIGHT CO. |
| To: | Thompson H Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| GL-85-07, GL-85-7, NUDOCS 8507160452 | |
| Download: ML20129D192 (3) | |
Text
.
b dm
'Af M
Telephone (412) 393-6000 Nu lea G,roup June 26, 1985 g
Shippingport, PA 15077-0004 -
Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulations U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTEN:
Hugh L. Thompson, Jr., Director Division of Licensing Washington, DC 20555
Reference:
Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit No.1 Docket No. 50-334, License No. DPR-66 Generic Letter 85-07, Integrated Living Schedule Survey Gentlemen:
Please find attached the completed survey form which was provided with Generic Letter 85-07. Although we have no plans at this time to develop and submit an integrated living schedule, we do maintain a multi-year schedule for planning work on Beaver Valley Unit No.1.
This is necessary and part of our normal process utilized in the effective planning of manpower and resources.
Circumstances in the future may develop which could make the concept of an integrated living schedule desirable for adoption at Beaver Valley. We intend to further evaluate the concept to determine if it will offer enhancements to safety within the constraints of the resources available to us.
Very trul yours, r
J. J. Carey Attachment cc: Mr. W. M. Troskoski, Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Beaver Valley Power Station Shippingport, PA 15077 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission c/o Document Management Branch Washington, DC 10555
[;Q l
L D
Director, Safety Evaluation and Control Virginia Electric & Power Company
)
g P.O. Box 26666 One James River Plaza Richmond, VA 23261 8507160452 850626 PDR ADOCK 05000334 P
pyp
ENCLOSURE 2 RESPONSE FORMAT - GENERIC LETTER 85-PLANT NAME:
Beaver Valley 1 e
UTILITY:
Duquesne Light Company I.
INTENTIONS A.
Intend to work with the staff to develop an ILS B.
Have reservations that must be resolved before developing ILS Do not present.y intend to negotiate an l
C.
ILS with the staff X
D.
Plan to implement an informal ILS only (See Note 1)
II.
STATUS A.
If you answered I.A above:
1.
Have you settled on a method for prioritizing the work at your plant (s)?
Circle One:
Yes_
No If yes, select best description:
Engineering judgement Analytic Hiearchy process Risk based analysis-Cost-benefit analysis Other (please describe)
If no, provide estimated date for selecting a methodology:
Date of If not presently available, provide estimated date for scheduling the selection of a methodology:
2.
What is your estimated date for making a submittal to the NRC-or If not presently available, planned date for scheduling a submittal to the NRC
s, B.
If you answered I.B above:
1.
Please explain your reservations on separate sheet (s) or provide your schedule for supplying an explanation See separate sheet (s) or 6
Separate submittal scheduled for (Date) 2.
If available to meet with the staff to discuss your concerns, propose a time frame for such a meeting and provide a contact that can make arrangements Contact / Time Frame Phone Number C.
If you answered I.C 1.
Would you be willing to meet with the staff to discuss the development of an ILS for your facility (s)?
Circle One:
Yes No If yes, propose a time frame for such a meeting and provide a contact that can make arrangements.
Contact Time Frame Phone Number If no, any constructive comments you have would be appreciated.
III.
ADDITIONAL ITEMS l
Please make any suagestions you may have as to how a utility sponsored availability / reliability proiect might be credited for plant safety I
enhancement.
Provide additional constructive comments as appropriate.
NOTE 1: Our Planning and Scheduling Department maintains a multi-year plan for scheduling work at BV-1 as part of our normal planning and scheduling process.
l
!