ML20129A616

Order Requiring Briefs in Support & Opposition of Intervenors 850529 & 30 Appeals of Board 850524 Order Implementing 850509 Grant of Applicant Motion for Exemption by 850612 & 21,respectively.Served on 850604

ML20129A616
Person / Time
Site:	Limerick
Issue date:	06/03/1985
From:	Shoemaker C NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP)
To:	AIR AND WATER POLLUTION PATROL, GRATERFORD INMATES
References
CON-#285-270 OL, NUDOCS 8506040678
Download: ML20129A616 (2)

Text

n l+

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARD Administrative Judges: DOCKETED

-USHRC Christine N. Kohl, Chairman June 3, 1985 Gary J. Edles Dr'. Reginald L. Gotchy- *85 JUN-4 A10:20 0FFICE OF SECnET;,n y

} 00CXETjNG & SERvt.;'

In the Matter of ANCH

)

)

PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY ) Docket Nos. 50-352 OL

) 50-353 OL (Limerick Generating Station, )

Units 1 and 2) l SERVED JUN -41985 ORDER

~

on May 29 and 30, 1985, intervenors Air and Water Pollution Patrol ,AWPP) and the inmates of the State Correctional Institution at Graterford, Pennsylvania, respectively, appealed the Licensing Board's May 24, 1985, order "iraplementing its [May 9, 1985] grant of applicant's motion for exemption." The inmates also seek a stay of the Board's order and incorporate by reference what was essentially a brief in support of the inmates' earlier, premature appeal from the May 9 Licensing Board order.

Because of the nature of the matters involved in these appeals, good cause c;.ists for shortening the briefing period. See 10 C.F.R. S 2.711(a). AWPP's brief and that of any other party in support of these appeals is to be received by us and the other parties by close of business 8506040678 850603 t PDR ADOCK 05000352 ($j PDR C

c:

., k '

y' :

2 (5:00 p.m.) June'12, 1985.1 Briefs in opposition to the appeals are to be received by us and the other parties by close of business June 21, 1985.

It is so ORDERED.

FOR THE APPEAL BOARD

b. Nharh C. Jegn Shoemaker Secretary to the Appeal Board Mr. Edles did not participate in this order.

1 We remind all parties, especially AWPP, that they should confine their arguments to the merits of the Licensing Board's May 9 and May 24 orders, which granted applicant's exemption request.