ML20128Q812
| ML20128Q812 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 10/16/1996 |
| From: | NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20128Q798 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99901037 99901037-96-01, 99901037-96-1, NUDOCS 9610210180 | |
| Download: ML20128Q812 (1) | |
Text
.
NOTICE OF NONCONFORMANCE
}
Zetec, Incorporated Docket No.: 99901037 Issaquah, Washington Based on the results of an inspection conducted July 15 through 18, 1996, it appears that certain of your activities were not conducted in accordance with l
the requirements of the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
1 Criterion V, " Instructions, Procedures, and Drawings," of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 requires that activities affecting quality be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings of a type appropriate to the circumstances and shall include appropriate quantitative or qualitative j
acceptance criteria for determining that important activities have been i
satisfactorily accomplished.
Section 2, " Quality Assurance Program," of Zetec's Quality Assurance Program Manual, Revision 14, January 1995, states in part, that "every procedure and all revisions are reviewed and approved by Quality Assurance... This review ensures that the standards of acceptability for all features and requirements are clear...."
Contrary to the above, Zetec did not establish, review or approve procedures 4
to control and ensure repeatable results regarding the development of safety-j related eddy current computer data screening techniques used by data analysts for their standard of acceptability.
(99901037/96-01-01) i Please provide a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear i
Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001, with a copy to the Chief, Special inspection Branch, Division of Inspection and Support Programs, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, within j
30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Nonconformance.
This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Nonconformance" and should include the followi6g for each nonconformance: (1) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to correct these items; (2) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to prevent recurrence of these items; and (3) the dates your corrective actions and preventive measures j
were or will be completed.
i 9610210180 961016 i
PDR GA999 EECZETEC l
99901037 PDR
]
l Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 16th day of October, 1996 j
i j