ML20128Q208

Rev 1 to Region V FY85 Regional Operating Plan

ML20128Q208
Person / Time
Issue date:	05/30/1985
From:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To:
Shared Package
ML20128Q182	List: ML20128Q178 ML20128Q208
References
PROC-850530, NUDOCS 8506040121
Download: ML20128Q208 (19)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:e.., mx,,.,_ 1 ,;s a + . 3 ~ 44" L 3 4 . e ~., s REGION V. ..+ FY-1985. ~ REGIONAL OPERATING PLAN (Revision.1) May 30, 1985- -1 x N

• r n.

W-r '-P p N Y U+ .A" 3 ,n + 'k f.:. 5:. e s +,. e e j- -. &,w + .,a ~ 9 . )< , ',%~ a 7 3, j s, y r 4,

• k.

n y d 4 + 3 4 -i s 4 ( ~ 't-L ?.,1 7 s + s' 3" . _ + 4 ~ r. Note: This Revision (Revision'1) of thel Region V-Operating Planfcontains resource 1 allocation changes that were made duringithe Region V. y . mid year review. These changes wef8 coordinated with the Program ~- Offices;during May 1985 and were identified'in the Region V submittal to the EDO-on May 20, 1985 oftheFY-85midyearrevigwof the Region V' Operating Plan. u 8506040121 850531 p' ~, PDR MISC c, 8506040113 PDR ~ ~ = T j g j 3 --g. 'I j s 3

7-I. Introduction The Regional Operating Plan is a statement of 'the major program objectives of Region V for FY 85. - This plan implements the guidance included in the Policy and Planning Guide (PPG), EDO Program Guidance, and program office guidance. These guidance documents are an integral part of the Regional Operating Plan. This plan also reflects the decisions of the EDO and the Commission during the FY 1986-1987 budget review cycle. The Operating Plan specifically identifies the Region V programmatic Decision . Units and the related resources. The resources, work actions and schedules. ~ for each Planned Accomplishment will be agreed upon by the Region and the Program Office. The performance standards, which.the Program Offices will use to evaluate the adequacy of the Regional performance, are contained in the body of the Operating Plan under each Program Office Decision Unit. The performance standards which the Regional Administrator is to be reviewed against by the EDO are those specifically identified in the SES contracts. Additionally, the Plan provides a basis for the mid year and end-of year resource and program reviews. Individual Planned Accomplishments are defined in the body of the Operating Plan under each Program Office Decision Unit. Performance of the identified Program Planned Accomplishments within the time frames and resources allotted, assumes normal workload requirements. Unexpected shifts in workload requirements, which require a reallocation of resources, as related to problem facilities or unique activities, and the resultant impact upon routine programs, are to be coordinated and resolved with the responsible Program-Office, and they will be included in updates of the Operating Plan.* II. EDO Program Guide EDO Program Guidance for FY 1984-1987 was issued on May 22, 1984. Policy Guidance applicable to Regional operatious is paraphrased below. E00 Program Guidance Paragraph II. Policy 1. Give highest priority to the safety of operating facilities. II. Guidance 1. Focus operating reactor inspections on licensee performance. Use AEOD and SALP reviews to help focus inspection activities, to allocate Regional resources, and .to assess licensee management of operating facilities. Give priority to poorly performing licensees. Find innovative approaches te inspecting operating reactor facilities. ~ These updates will be submitted.in accordance.with Field Policy Manual, Procedure No. 3 - Revision 1.' t a

%y., GX-M ~ afi 9 44 o +& t _ g o e+, ,1 ) & j '- l

6.5

-{_Q_' y -1; ,~

• E m,

p 9 ,9-c ,y.. _v y cn, xe t

1. '%' ^

-II.: Guidance;9., L Focus operatingJreactor inspections first;o'a operations' e t-m r +7a - 7 <j.,, and then on maintenance'(including preventive) and E. 1 ?- surveillance activities. Increase direct observation.- ff lRecommend to.'IE ;the' eliniination' of marginal ' inspection' +b s -activities..Where: sufficient; documentation is available_

• ^

> iise PRA?in Testablishing inspection priorities where ~ m .a applicable. (See VIII.C Guidance 3) ~ III.. Policy:1.. " Improve NRC activities!that.-affect the' quality of nuclear plants. n 'III. Policy 2. . Understand the root' cause of problems att facilities under construction and"at operating facilities and~ bring tolthe y attention of-management for; resolution. 4. ~ III. - PolicyI-3. ' Pursue aggressively: utility management for safelyK 1 operating and' maintaining nuclear plants; quality,in utility; operations,l procedures, systems, and components;: 5 and better guidance for. treatment of plant. systems ~, components and equipment' that can adversely affect safe operation. x a [III. Policy 4.' Highlight the necessity for highly-trained and qualified ~ _ w 4 professionals to manage licensee, contractor, a'nd vendor ~ functions related to safety. ,e III. Guidance. -None~ directed specifica11ycat Regional Offices. ,s ~ 'IV.A. Guidance 2.< ' Implement the, commission's policies on plant-specific i w .backfitting, as' described in 48 B 44173, September 28,~ >1983; in SECY 83-321; and.in SECY 83-505 as approved and 1 -c modified by~the Commission'. IV.'A. Guidance 4. . Assist lNRR,Jas necessary, in establishing and maintaining ~ 4-implementation schedules for new and existing-regulatory. . requirements for. power reactor licensees. ~ s e g~ ~ LIV.D. Policy.1. Continue-to implement'the decentralization policy goals 1' approved by the Commission in October'1981. IV.D.: Guidance 1.. Keep. licensees informed of'the nature and extent of' decentralization. - 3 A .IV.F. Policy 1. Apply the-enforcement program effectively, uniformly,. firmly,' and fairlyfto ensure' compliance.with NRC safety ~ 3, .and safeguards requirements. ,g ..y )IV.F. Policy 2. EnsureLappropriate corrective-actions by licensees. Take ~ ' prompt and vigorous actioniagainst noncompliance. w IV.F. Policy 3. Perform thorough inspections.to identify the cause of ~ noncompliance. . i o 9 3 - _ k.

• 'a n

_-b w_ 1 g l.. ].1/ r

. t. x n;~

3

'O.. s ,1 +' 3., ~ ~lIVlF. Policy ~.4. Encourage. aggressive' safety approach by licensees. Give ~ credit.for prompt reporting and.for prompt, thorough,,and-lwhole-hearted corrective action. n

IV.F;' Guidance 2.

Expedite enforcement' actions to issue proposed civil ~ penalty within 8 weeks after_ inspection or investigation. Promptly and vigorously implement the published (49 FR 8583, March 8, 1984) enforcement' policy. ~ IV.G. Guidance-1. Ensure that' Regional activities do not delay" reactor-Lstartup unnecessarily. V.A. Guidance 2. Assist NMSS as necessary with RERs. 'VI.. Guidance'1.* LContinueEto provide resident inspectors and health -physicists.to support NRR in THI-2 cleanup. 4

VIII.'A.' Guidance 1.*The Chairman.of the Safety' Goal Evaluation Plan Steering Group should brief the Commission about every 3 to 4 months.

VIII.C. Guidance 3. Where sufficient documentation is available use PRA in setting reactor inspection priorities where applicable. (See II Guidance 9.) x h,s s-f " Region I only - 3 ( b., .t II 'r i F i, 4 $# y e t a

@e ;q 3 m'T' <- m m -g g %. x ,- u g.1 1 4' , s ()( p - r-sll q e [' III: IInspection and Enforcement Programs ~ + JC, iA; .0verview ~. x. - :The purpose of the Inspection and Enforcement (IE)-program is: ' (1) to i' determine through' inspection whether licensees comply'with NRC g

regulations and wiiether licensees adequately protect the public health and'. safety and~the environment; and (2) to maintain effective and uniform.

j The:IE Regional workload consists mainly of: (1) reactors Hg _ enforcement: ; t 7under' construction;;(2)(reactors in operation; (3) vendors and quality-y' = assurance;s(4) enforcement,. technical support, and incident response; f(5) fuel cycle an'd materials; and (6) specialized technical training._ Regional. offices inspect licensees,-initiate (and largely complete). < ^ -enforcement actions,Jsystematically assess licensee _ performance," respond "to incidents, and provide inspection related support to IE, 01, and.other A { ~ offices. ~ ~ 'B. ' Decision ~ Unit'l Reactors Under Construction i .The Reactors Under ;Contruction inspection program. consists of T independent, routine Ascheduled), and reactive (unscheduled). inspections

by _ residen_t and region-based inspectors. -Res'idents assume a portion ofl

~ the inspection activity previously-conducted by region-based inspectors, .substantially. increasing direct verification of licensee: performance ~ '.n through directiobservation and independent' measurements. ~

Anticipated WorkloadI s

O Pie-CP Units-0' / Early Stige Units' 'O ~' ' Mid Stage Units 0

Late Stage-Units

3; (Includes deferred plants _i.e., WNP11/3' ' Q: q Total. 6 $.3 7 x + u? m .m +, Major Program Planned ' Accomplishments, Resources',' Allotment and Go s v e .,e, ' ~ ~ The major " Program Planned Accomplishments foNthis DecisionLUnit are as' _ x identified:below. 'The tracking of resources'and work' actions as related' 'to these Planned Accomplishments will;be performed byLusidg the'RWAT ~ B output report of the Regulatory.Information;TracliinglSystemj(RITS).. 1 4 t =' ~ Perform Inspections of Power Reactors Unde,r; Construction? ,s .a. w i,_ ^, y# - t Resou.ces Allocated ,FTE.- 2.427 - Program Supp' ort - $20K [ 3 ~ / v. ( .The additionalj 0.37'FTE above that initially budgeted ~ will be ,~ reprogrammed from overhead). t 1 . Goals = : Perform inspections.it-accordance with IE Manual '9 + Chapter 2512. A, s Performance Standards. + + k1 y b ^ s g I v w.- L:

3 + 5 t' ~ 3 Quality implementation of jinspection programs, fgenerally within.the time limits specified by applicable Manual Chapters and' agreed upon by the s-N' . Regional and Program Offices,'is considered fully successful performance. p -Quality implementation of insp~ection programs, completion of all planned Lactivities within the. agreed time limits, and demonstration of an .in-depth,.evaluative inspection l program constitute outstanding ' performance. - C. d' Decision Unit 2 - Reactors in Operation Resources associated,with the. Reactors in Operation program are utilized s

for. independent, r6utine (scheduled),. and reactive (unscheduled) inspections. Nuclear. reactors inspected are: power reactors in p

(pre-operations testing, startup testing; and power operation; and - ' ~ ~ nonpower:(test and'research) reactors; The-inspection. program will continue to place emphasis on direct observation of plant operations at. each nuclear reactor unit. A"significant portion of this effort is ' performed by' resident inspectors. Inspectionirogram emphasis for the- ' resident inspectors is-placed!on observation _of' licensee'ractices and.on p operational safety verification.. Region-based inspectors inspect in . specialized areas and otherwise supplement the inspection program performed by the Resident Inspectors! _ .~ ,. s ' Anticipated Workload ~_ ill ( [- Power Reactors m.- 'No'npower Reactors F 21:' Major Program Planned Accomplishments s ' The-major: Program Planned Accomplishments for this Decision Unit are as -identified below. The tracking of resources and work actions as related- .to these Planned Accomplishments will be performed by using the RWAT format output of the Regulatory Information Tracking System (RITS). L a) ' Perform Inspections'of Power Reactorstin the Pre-Operations Phase Resources' Allocated'- FTE 7.36 Program Support - 0 Goals - Perform inspections in accordance with IE Manual Chapter 2513 b) Perform Inspections of Power Reactors in the Start-up Phase Resources Allocated - FTE - 8.66 Program Support - $24K Goals - Perform Inspections in'accordance with IE Manual Chapter 2514 1 c)- Perform Inspections of Power Reactors in the Operations Phase / 6 t

c.; g, W - ;g 3 + 'c '*N<, .3, t' 6 3. ; u w.;3 y _\\ 3

v. s,4.

3;' ' W lc ' .c 3 3 W t =a 4 ' = ,J-j, s + a f 4 l ' k ~ ~ ^ I r*

Resources" Allocated ;FTE --18.62 Program Support-- $252K jf -

-? y - n:.

1. 7t.py

• ; Goals - ' Perform inspect' ions in accordance' with IE Manuall fy qg 1 i

Chapter 2515_ u.

w'

.d)i' " Perform wrgency Preparedn'ss Licensing, Action's e 4'- 4 ,. Resources Allocated - FTE -.0.16s Q 1 R Program Support - None 1, f [ l'

GoalsiCompletefapproximately9.75licensingactionsand

~ . complete each action within;an: average completion time of 90 ,' 2 + ^' " calendar-days.- - ~~ m- ' ((- ne) Perform Inspections' at-Nori power Reactor's " 7

/C

. y7 . Resources-Allocated..-.FTE - 0.98~, f',' Program Support - None' J, l. t ,g; Goals - Perform-inspections:in:accordance with IE Manual-Chapter-2545 2p .. f) - Prepare for and Participate in Hearings w ' + u, 4 Resources A116cated - FTE -.0.00 Program Support - None r Goals - Perform through preparation and provide quality: yy - performance at;all hearings where Region-V is a participant. . g); ; Perform Additional Inspections of Modifications During Outages. .e i ' Resources Allocated.- FTE - 0.22 r .+ l Program Support ;None y s ^ Goalst-Perform inspections;in accordance with;IE Manu'al ra 'd

Chapter.2515.

^ The ddditionaI 3'.58 FTE above that' initially budgeted for this L .;l, Note: Decision. Unit ~will be obtained"from overhire (0.95 FTE) and~ -through' resources reprogrammed-from overhea'dj(2.63 FTE). m[ ' ' Performance Standards 1 ~ ,t u .Qualityimplementation~of'ihspbetionprograms;includingcompletionof the minimum inspection program, substantial completi'ori ~of the basic . program, and c6mpletion'of. supplemental inspections as 'needed within the ' time limits specified by applicable Manual Chapters andiagreed upon by ';. Q. the Regional and'the Program Offices,,is. considered fully successful "N^ performance. Quality-implementation of-inspection programs, as described +, for. fully. successful performance, that.are well managed.astindicated by full' utilization of SALP findings and that demonstrate an in-depth,- ^ evaluative inspection approach' constitutes outstanding performance. 7 - w ga + ,m +5 t E +

• c %

e, W 3 ? _j., r g e (& 3 I a. -a t

7 i ,7 ( b ? D. Decision Unit 3 - Vendors and Quality Assurance Resources for Vendor Inspection are'in IE. Regional Resources in other h: Decision Units will be used to coordinate and follow-up on licensee -issued associated with IE vendor inspections. Resources for Quality 1[ Assurance are primarily in IE, but some Regional staffing will be required for licensing changes to already licensed QA programs. Regional resources for QA program inspections are provided in Decision Units 1 and f 2. There also will be some Regional participation in the IDI program. Anticipated Workload The workload is not well defined. The amount of actual work performed on this decision unit will be dependent upon the QA Licensing change requests received'and the number of IDI inspections performed. r Major Program Planned Accomplishments, Resources Alotments and Goals The major Program Planned Accomplishments for this Decision Unit are as identified below. The tracking of resources and work actions as related ) to these Planned Accomplishments will be performed by using the RWAT format output of the Regulatory Information Tracking System (RITS). a) Perform QA Change Reviews red participate in IDI inspections. Resources Allocated - lie - 0.33 Program Support - None (The addttional 0.10 FTE above that initially budgeted will be obtained through overhire). Goals - Complete QA reviews and participate in IDI inspections to the extent work is received or.until allocated resources are expended. Performance Standards Quality implementation of assigned QA licensing and IDI activities, generally within th'e time limits specified by applicable Manual Chapters and agreed upon by the Regional and Program Offices, is considered fully successful performance. Quality implementation, completion of all planned activities within the agreed time limits, and demonstration of Regional commitment to assigned QA licensing and IDI activities constitute outstanding performance, i E. Decision Unit 4 - Enforcement, Technical Support, and Incident Response. Regional resources associated with the Enforcement, Technical Support and Incident Response programs include staff and funds for enforcement coordination, SALP, laboratory / technical support, Regional incident response, technical equipnent, technical support to investigations and allegation follow-up. Major Program Planned Accomplishments, Resources Allotments and Goals L

1. N.

O 'Mi - ' i @, m: _, /w 3 .i y h q. s.i K %: t/ P + 4-~ ~

g,z g T J

+ st t .81 >1-bc- ,s v: ,n -:{ y.Mi $[ 3 ^ g _;,r 1 -e

i-m.,

~ W-e,') g + +. t ,_] gr .-._,z_... y WV> ',, 3..

• f;j x-

'6 (The majorjProgram Planned: Accomplishments for this Decision Unit ^are :as' ' identified below'. Theitracking of resources and work actionsias related a -41 a 4 5 f s to these. Planned' Accomplishments will-be' performed'byfusing-the RWATL 1 9 ^ 7 'i f format.outputuof the:Re'gulatory.Information Tracking System (RITS). w t a. . Enforcement Coordination q. ~ x /*' . Resources-Allocated - FTE - l'.00 + Program _ Support'. ~None yy e -: Goals..- Implement the Enforcement Program in_accordance,with 'm 9: Enforcement Policy;and Guidance., Complete _ proposed Civil. Penalty actions,{on the_ average,;within eight' weeks. ~ s L g n.c ,a W+~ 'b. ' Systematic Assessment of; Licensee Performance (SALP)~ r gd;t ' i = . Resources' Allocated-i FTE - 1;12 ~ ' Program' Support - None-FV' ,e< ~.^ nd,

• 1*-

> r;. ' Goals 4 Implement the SALP~ Program in accordance.with IE.ManuaE, , a ' Chapter 0516. "c Van and Labs -(Lab Technician)- . Resources Allocated.FTE - 0.50 ' Program Support - None ~* Goals - Not Applicable d.: Incident Response 1 Resources Allocated - FTE - 1.94 [ ~ Program Support None 3 Goals - Implement the Incident Response Program in accordance with NUREG 0845 and its published. supplements. -Ve.. Technical Support to Investigators ' Resources Allocated - FTE - 0.50 Program Support - None

• ~

. Goals ~ Provide prompt and effective' technical support to.OI~as

'y

- e specified~in OI Policy. Statement.No. 12. /. M 'f? Alle'gation Followup l y Resources-Allocated FTE - 2.71J 4, Program Support - $125K* } j , ^,. Goa1s-Implementahikh'qualityallegations"trackingand. ~ p M f ^ [ ~ within six calendir months. followup program and close out,each allegation, on the average,_ i ( g ,[' i, ,,0 , ( -> s p E. h( o 1 %;.i " s j y b s-A 1, [1 i ' ' 9 1.. .,,? ~l 1; Q

g7 -~ r, s + 4 s j7 ;y 9 m -r m.- +, m m This-money is_ dedicated for Region.V use;.1however, it,is - ~ Jh. ,.being administered by IE Headquarters through a task-order '7 technical assistance contract. ' ~ 1 NM ^ Note: iTh' _additionalL O.57 FTE.'above that initially budgeted will. be '. e 1' 'obtained through overhire. LPerformance Standards- .i. + - Quality implementation of programs within this. Decision Unit,igenerally ~ -Lin accordance with applicable NRC and Program Office: policies and' _?; ; '_ ' procedures,' constitutes fully successfu1> performance ;Qualitp J implementation ~of programs.in accordance with applicable policies and' i s-J. procedures,.' submittal of substantially complete proposed enforcement ' -' ~ +* 1 actions within six weeks of the time'a violatio'n is: identified, and' , maintenance of a highly capable emergency;. response -program constitute ~' u _

outstanding performance.

DEcisionL nit 5'- Fuel Cycle'and Materials L F.' U ~ /' Resburces -associated.with Fuel Cycle and Materials programs are utilized for-independent,: routine-(scheduled), and reactive-(unscheduled) J = inspections'in the areas of radiation safety,-material control and; 'accountiing, and physical: security. g.

u. '

A'nticipated~ Workload Uranium Fuel Fabrication. '5 facilities - ( . Advanced Fuel R&D.and. 0 ~ -Pilot Facilities s UF E ?0 s s _c

Spent Fuel Storage t0

'V ., ff 'Q~~ w* 7' r- ~ Uranium' Mills 40 ,3 + y

Materials-Licensees to s 138Elicense'es

,f' 'gc .Be-Inspected. T g. h., g 7 . Major Program Planned Accomplishments, Resource's Allotments and Goals I 4,. j:,. TThe' major Program Planned-Accomplishments for'this D' cision' Unit are as e identified below. The: tracking of' resources and work actions as related tio these Planned Accomplishments will be' p'erformed by.using the RWAT' f format output.of the Regulatory'Information Tracking-System.(RITS). ~ i' s a. _ Perform Inspections at Fuel Facilities- " Resources'Alloca'ted - FTE '2.69" .T. Program Supp, ort'-:None e f e 4 e

plg' ; %,* . m,= + 3 / ~ gg W v-e x, '0 s n az 1 /._ 4 A.. %.m m, i.; ~ c m e. s m r g yw s x r ~ w ~; z ,(The; additional l0.32 FTE:thatihas been added to this Planned:

.7

' f; [ y. Accomplishment;has been obtained from the Perform Materialse y J.

Inspections Planned Accomplishment).

~ c o - *p sGoals' Perform insp'est! ions.in accordance with IE Manual. _ ~ 1, 4 - 'n. Chapter 2600' f ~ s. ,a '[ 7 _- b. ' Perform Materials Inspections + s_ m 6 ) . Resources Allocated - FTE --2.90 5 Program Support .$8K. s s, m. w

e.. ;

1 .(The.0.32 FTE that has been iemoved'fdom'this Planned f, ' Accomplishment has been added'tolthe Perform Inspections 1at- -Fuel Facilities Planned Accomplishment).~ \\ ( Goals--PerfobinspectionsinaccordancewithiIEManual,- M, !*? s -Chapter 2800,' S / M- 'n,, + f. 2 m g". x: -Perform Decommissioning /Closeous"Insp~ect, ions Q - c. ~ ~ --As

• v b
• 1

' Resources -' Allocated ~ FTE ' 0.11...,i. m-e l< Program Support;_'None' / L g. g o . e m 7 -- -, / % x.. ,., 4

• L

. Goals - Implem'est a High Quality! Deco'mInissiorii_ng/ Closeout 3 c 1 E ~. Inspection' Program. j j Perform 10 CFR.Part:61 Inspections! i'l. p - g\\ %~ kj

g. 7

d.-

1 x. s,. )14 h s'. = ', - t e: u u, uf. *, ..J 3 4,, y v . Resources' Allocated -I FTE r.03[ - ~ ~ ~ F Pro ~g* ram'Supp5rt - None s

c..

y a' ~ -[ Goals - Perform 10.CFR Part '61 inspections in accordance with ' yc i N... . Inspection Procedsre' 84850 of'IE Manual Chapters 2600 and 2800. r y s E y, f S' Performance Standards .N E ' 5- '4 w " ', r. Implementation of an evaluative, independent' inspection' effort;that: ,.~ generally completes:the applicable inspection modules ~is considered. fully . successful' performance. Implementation of an aggressive, independent, o 4 evaluative inspection program, along with substantial completion:of the-1 applicable inspection modules, constitutes-outstanding performance. ~ s t I f-4 ' p; f p s. g. ,f ,I t 7 4 s v 4. ,4' 3 p.

• • T 8

b_ a .l ' .g ' 2y y n i 4. ~ 1

11 3 IV. Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards A. Overview The purpose _of the Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards (NMSS) program is to ensure adequate protection of the public health and safety and the environment in the design, siting, construction, and operation of nuclear fuel cycle facilities, including nuclear waste storage and disposal facilities, and in the utilization and transportation of nuclear materials. Regional Offices are responsible for performing certain safety, environmental, and safeguards reviews as related to: (1) fuel ' cycle facility and nuclear material safety, (2) safeguards, and (3) low level waste management and uranium recovery. B. Decision Unit 1 - Fuel Cycle Facility and Nuclear-Material Safety Resources associated with Fuel Cycle Facility and Nuclear Material Safety are utilized for policy-and regulation implementation and for licensing casework. Anticipated Incoming Workload a. Material Licensing Cases New Applications 32 Amendments 104 Renewals 43 Total 179 -b. Fuel Facility Licensing Cases - 1 (Total) Major Program Planned Accomplishments, Resources Allotments and Goals The major Program Planned Accomplishments for this Decision Unit are as ' identified below. The tracking of resources and case completions as related to these Planned Accomplishments will be performed by using the luh4T output of the Regulatory Information Tracking System (RITS). a. Complete Materials Licensing Cases Resources Allocated - FTE - 1.27* Program Support - None Goals - Complete each licensing case, on the average, within 60 working days from the date of receipt of the application. Complete licensing cases ~in'a consistent, technically adequate manner. Includes resources for site visits, information requests, technical assistance to agreement states, national program review; continuing 4 regional oversight; and Materials, Licensing. Casework. +

T [.% ^ ((Q, } f,f g f ~fg- + p ,1 4:, ,',y 7 s, + ,. g. 1 , ;$ *a la : -y i . > [. 1 i ', 7 ,1 l~ ~ ~' ~ a s et 2ls'l L .g y

• ,.. j A

4 m 2..c ;p.J: - _;c ~ n: Complete Fuel Facil'ityILicensing. Cases B g: ' " ?b. j b' 'o -

Resources Allocated.~ ' FTE'- 0 03 s

P m, Program Support - None ..?,._ ~ + ' ; Goals - Complet'e licen' sing cases:in-a timely,; consistent and N Stechnically adequate manner. + ^+ d.. ~ l a JPerformance Standards' ? ~ ~ 3 .R-j~ I Quility implementationof programs within this. Decision Unit, including i 2 -completion ofJthe following projected number. of licensing cases in a:- fx, 2 consistent,-techni'cally adequate' manner is' considered fullyisuccessful' i '} performance. -Completion of a* significantly greater number of licensing ~y,

cases!than projected is considered. outstanding performance.

c _ y = Projected. Materials Licensing ~ Case Completions (Cumulative): x: .oi N. 1D J F -M= A M J J. A-Sr

15-30 45 60 -75 90

.105 120 135-150 165 '179 7 7 f (Projicted Fuel Facility-Licensing Case Completions (Cumulative): 1 LO- ?N D' J-F- M A' - M -. J J A-S 10= 10. 0-0; 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4, g y l- .. C ~ IDecision Unit 2 4 Safeguards ~ 1 .' Resources associated with safeguardsfare utilized.for policy and g s regulation-implementation, other technical activities, Land licensing ' casework'and technical assistance. ~ 1 t. iAnticipated Incoming Workload ~

a.

L10 CFR 50.54 Safeguards Cases - 25 cases / b;CFR70.32 Safeguards' Cases-- - b '. " si 7 cases iMajor' Program Planned Accomplishments, Resources Allotments and Goals ~ The; major Program Planned Accomplishments' forLthis Decision Unit are as { identified below.. Thel tracking'of resources'and case' completions as related.to these.PlannedfAccomplishments will be performed by using the iRWAT, output of the, Regulatory Information Tracking System (RITS). 4., i 10;CFR'50.54' Safeguards Licensing Cases a. ~~ ' ~ * ' Resources Allocated - FTE - 0.40* - Program Support - None .Contains re's'ources for' national program review continuing regional oversight,!and 10.CFR 50.54 Safeguards Licensing Casework. 9i* I t c f M 4 i

y* ~y 33

~ g _ 3. :, e 1 ng.:.. e ' x. f 13,* '(._ ~ "' e t r f; s ~.Q-j,(.- gp [ -o;

Goals ~ - Complete ' licensing cases in a timely,.tconsistent and.

f' 1 . technically. adequate: manner. j ~

b.

10:CFR 70.32. Safeguards Licensing Cases JResources' Allocated -.FTE - 0.09 Program Support: :None-o Goals Complete licensing cases in a. timely,fconsistent and ? ~

technica11y' adequate manner.

c S~ cl 'RER's e j. g. Resources' Allocated - FTE - 0.09 Program Support - None

Goals =- Not applicable

[d. Route' Surveys / Contingency Planning .a 1 Resources Allocated - FTE - 0.08- ~ . Program Support - None. ' Goals - Not applicable Performance Standards: ' Quality implementation-o'f programs within this~ Decision Unit,. including- ~ q r com'pletion of the following projected number of' licensing cases;in a D- . consistent,: technically adequate manner is considered fully successful 4 performance. Completion of a significantly~ greater number of licensing' s ^ . cas'es than ~ projected is ' considered outstanding performance. v Projected 10 CFR 50.54' Safeguards Licensing: Case., Completions'. ss

(Cumulative):

0

N D

J -- F. M A- .M J .J A S c1j c3 5-6 -8 10: 11 13-15' '16 18 20 Projected 10 CFR 70.32 Safeguards Licensing Case Completio'ns (Cumulative): 0, .N -D J F. H - A M J J' A, S-

0^

0-1 . 1 1 2 2 3 3' 4 4 5-s t t' j 4 f J s d' d[ r' - d r f a f ,f, ~,. ; v.l. L.- 1

g. = 14 V. Nuclear Reactor Regulation A. Overview The purpose of the Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) program is to ensure adequate' protection of public health and safety and the environment in - the _ design, siting, construction, and operation of nuclear reactors. Regional Offices are responsible for certain review and licensing activities related to: (1) operating reactors, (2) systematic _ safety i evaluation of operating reactors,1and (3) operator licensing. B. Decision Unit 1 - Operating Reactors Resources allotted for Operating Reactors provide-for-regional technical reviews of both multiplant and plant-specific operating reactor licensing actions', as assigned by the Program Office. Anticipated Workload Plant Specific-6 actions Multiplant (0660/0737) 0 Multiplant, A-E 3 actions Total 9 actions Major Program Planned Accomplishments,' Resources Allotments and Goals The major Program Planned Accomplishments for this Decision Unit are as identified below. The tracking,of: resources and work actions as related to these Planned Accomplishments'will be performed by'using the RWAT output of' the Regulatory Information _ Tracking System (RITS). a. Perform Operating Reactor Licensing Actions 3 Resources Allocated - NTE 1.50 -Program Support - None Coals - Complete all. assigned licensing a'tions within the due c dates agreed to by Region V and NRR. The number of licensing actions, type of licensing action, delivery date from NRR, and scheduled completion date will be jointly negotiated and agreed upon between Region V and_NRR. 'To'the extent that these negotiations affect the anticipated wo'rkload and allocated resources they will be included in updates of the Operating Plan. The above will hold if Regional Office responsibility consists of either a completed SER or partial technical input to an SER. Delays due to poor quality of licensee submittals may require revisions of completion dates for the associated action. Performance Standards

15 Fully successful performance for each region will be completion of 90% of assigned actions received on schedule from NRR by the agreed upon due date and within the above delineated resources, coupled with a favorable evaluation of program management by NRR. Outstanding performance can be accomplished by completing all actions on or ahead of schedule, coupled with a highly favorable evaluation of program management by NRR. C. Decision Unit 2 - Operator Licensing On October 1, 1983, under the oversight of NRR, all regions were -transferred the responsibility for conducting operator license examinations. Responsibility for administration of the operator licensing technical assistance program will remain with'NRR in FY 1985. Regional staff will serve as technical monitors for'all contracts under the program. Anticipated Workload Initial 2 Examinations Replacement' 19' Examinations-1 Requalification 3 Examinations ~ 1 Certification 3 Examinations Nonpower 7/ Examinations r Total 34 Examinations Within the level of resources provided for initial replacement and' requalification examinations, priority will be given to initial and replacement examinations. However, to the extent that the number of anticipated initial or replacement examinations do not materialize additional requalification examinations will be given up to a maximum of I site visit for 50% of the operating plants. Major; Program Planned Accomplishments, Resources Allotments and-Goals The major Program Planned Accomplishments for this Decision Unit are as identified below. The tracking of resources and work actions as related to these Planned Accomplishments will be performed by using the RWAT output of the Regulatory Information Tracking System (RITS). a. Administer Reactor Operator Licensing Examinations 1. Conduct examinations in accordance with the Planned Work Load Table above and in accordance with the Examiner Standards (NUREG-1021). 2. Schedule examination at least 90 days in advance to ensure that contract examiners are available if required. w

f". l 16.J' l-( .3. Provide feedback on all contract examiner performance to Headquarters OLB.

• ~

4. Request hardware for and commence use of the computerized Examination Question Bank. 1 . Resources ~ Allocated - FTE - 3.7 Program Support - $385K* Goals - Implement a high quality program that results in minimal impact on plant licensing actions and plant operations. Performance Standards. For fully successful performance, 85 percent of the estimated site visits-are conducted, unless cancelled by the utility, within the in-house and contract resources allotted. Examinations are conducted in accordance with the Delegation of Operator Licensing Authority and NUREG-1021, " Operator Licensing Examiner Standards." Examinations'are scheduled sufficiently in advance such that licensee schedules are accommodated with minimum delay in OL decisions. For operating reactors,-examinations are scheduled,to ensure that the licensee can meet all NRC imposed staffing requirements provided that the licensee proposes examinations in advance. Evaluation of program management is favorable by~ NRR. . 0utstanding performance is conducting greater than 95% of the estimated examinations at operating reactors, including requalification audit examinations, coupled with highly favorable evaluation of program management by NRR. Note that impact on facility schedules or operations due to high failure ' rates that are sustained by Headquarters OLB on request for regrade or appeal-is not considered to be a failure to meet these standards. 1 e i 1 g This amount of money is expected to be used by Region V. It is being administered by NRR Headquarters'through a Task Order' technical assistance contract. .g 9 I 4 4 e f b

p/ j ;,; ,a , ry -, ; p m 3...

r,,

4, ;.-. g c n 33 17 1, 3 "'t, ~ l ' y VI. r , ~- Section Chiefs'and: Overhead n ,g 4 ?9 4- - c i~ 2 A. ~ Decision' Unit 1 - Section. Chiefs and Overhead m ' Regional resources: associated with this-Decision Unit are used for~ supervisory,: clerical, and administrative, support of the programs defined "^ -fin sections:IIIpIV,.and V of this Operating Plan. ~ Major Program Planned Accomplishments, Resources Allotments and Goals

The major Program Planned Accomplishment for this Decision Unit is-identified below. The tracking of~ resources and work actions as related.

.to this Planned; Accomplishment will.be. performed by using the RWAT format.' J ' output of the Regulatory Information Tracking System (RITS). 1 .a. Provide supervisory,' clerical, and administrative support for -programs identified in. sections III, IV and V. ~ Resources Allocated - FTE - 24.2 - Program Support - None Goals Not Applicable k + f r- - r ' 4.i h 1 o I E t l' a 5 A 1 L

pp. - g ~ a w s - m',' pp. ~ , ;18 - 3 x, ~ .* b # q, 5 s -x d' LVII. Management / Administration'and Program Technical Support. - e

Decision Unit 1

' Management / Administration'and Program Technical' Support IA. ~ 5 L- 'Resourcesiallocated for'this Decision' Unit are?used to provide Management.. ~ (Branch: Chief 1evel and above), Administrative, and-Program Technicalc ,' 7fz ' Supportifor a11' Region V.' activities including State Liaison, State-m =1 1 Agreements,: ELD,:~and Public Affairs'. 2 f t-. . i MajoE Program' Planned Accomplishments, Resources Allotments and' Goals The major Program Planned Accomplishments for this Decision-Unit are as-L identified below..The tracking of resources and work actions as related ~ .to'these-Planned Accomplishments-will be performed by,using the RWATt

foomatl output-of the Regulatory:Information Tracking System.(RITS).

_ " f a; Perform: State Liaison Activities i. . Resources Allocated - FTE - 1.00 a-Program-Support --None ^ Goals - Perform state liaison activities in accordance,with 1 Region V and Office of State Programs policies and procedures.- ~ ~b. . Perform State. Agreement Reviews Resources Allocated - FTE - 1.00 zA - Program Support None c,7 - Goals'- Perform state agreement reviews in accordance with~the. 0ffice of State Programs, State-Agreement Policy, Procedure and. o 'Information Manual. c. " Management-and Administrative Support" t Resources Allocated - FTE -.18.68 . Program Support - None 7 4 Goals - Provide prompt and quality level management and administrative support for all Region V activities. 3 .d. Office of Regional Administrator J Resources Allocated - FTE - 5.00 ~ - Program Support-- None Goals - Not Applicable b Performance Standards - Not Applicable O f% i + n . "s. .t ii s .. -,,.. - ~., ,y ~,, _. ~, m,.-, ,,..~,,,,,,,r,..., ..,. ~ < -}}