ML20128Q176

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses Oc Review of Final Rule, Medical Administration of Radiation & Radioactive Matls. Oc Concures in Final Rulemaking Package
ML20128Q176
Person / Time
Issue date: 06/12/1995
From: Heumann E
NRC
To: Mcguire S
NRC
Shared Package
ML20007C611 List:
References
FRN-60FR48623, FRN-60FR4872, RULE-PR-20, RULE-PR-35 AF10-2-022, AF10-2-22, NUDOCS 9605150043
Download: ML20128Q176 (2)


Text

.

t

,a From: Elise A. Heumann (EAH1)

To:

SAM 2 Date: Monday, June 12,1995 9:55 am

Subject:

OC concurrence: Medical Administration NOTE TO: Steve McGuire, RES

' FROM: Elise Heumann, OC/DBA OC REVIEW OF FINAL RULE - MEDICAL ADMINISTRATION OF

SUBJECT:

RADIATION AND RADIOACHVE MATERIALS OC has reviewed the subject rulemaking in response to D.L Morrison's May 30,1995 request for OC coordination.

OC reviewed the proposed rule in October 1994. No resources were needed to implement the proposed rule, amending NRC regulations to clarify that the medical administration of radiation or radioactive materials to any individual is regulated by the provisions of 10 CFR Part 35 and not by 10 CFR Part 20. This final rulemaking takes into consideration the comments received on the proposed rule. No significant changes were made from the proposed rule. OC therefore finds that there are no resource related issues and concurs in the fm' al rulemaking package.

OC Action item: OC-95-131 DBA Action item: DBA-95-137 DBA File: NML-2.7 CC:

djc2, jde, sls XA -vo O S I[c o Ll 3

..i.

RESEARCH ACTION-l TEM May 12, 1994 MAIL CONTROL FORM 12:45 pm PROM:

J.

HOYLE RES No.:

940144 TO:

J. TAYLOR EDO No.:

~

ACTION NECES/APPR?: N FOIA No.:

WITS No.: 9400099 DESCRIPTION: SECY 94027 ADMIN OF A RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL TO THE WRONG PATlENT CP"CI?.L INSTRUCTIONS:

12 1994 DOCUMENT DATE: Ma 10 1994 RECEIVED BY RES: Madetot'er 21,1994 DUE TO RES:

ctob, er 18,1994 DUE TO EDO:

)

ASSIGNED TO: LB. MORRIS, DRA:

FOR SIGNATURE OF:

v wg ROUTING:

E.

BECKJORD T. SPEIS C.J. HELTEMES M.

FATO Af tHS part et fE a tite eenes a

.e e

1

ACTION - Lieberman, OE,

+pA "ag'o,

,Beckjord, RES UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Cys:

Taylor 8 "' ) U(

n g

y Milhoan WASHINGTON,0.C. 20555

. s[g Thompson e

%, ***** o Blaha Bernero CFF6CE OF THE Paperiello sEenETAny

~

May 10, 1994 MEMORANDUM TO:

James M. Taylor Execut Dir c r for Operatiens.

FROM:

, John Hoy e Acting Secretary

SUBJECT:

SECY-94-027 - APPLICABILITY OF THE PROVISIONS OF 10 CFR 20.1301 TO THE ADMINISTRATION OF A RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL TO THE WRONG PATIENT -

ENFORCEMENT ACTION AGAINST THE VETERANS ADMINISTRATION MEDICAL CENTER, LONG BEACH, CA (EA 93-203)

The Commission (with the Chairman and Commissioners Remick and da Planque agreeing) has approved:

1) issuance of the proposed letter and Notice of Violation to the Veterans Administration Medical Center in Long Beach, California; and 2) the staff proposal to proceed with rulemaking to clarify that the medical administration of radioactivity or radioactive materials to a patient (which includes a " wrong patient") is the exclusive province of the regulations in Part 35.

Commissioner Rogers would have preferred a modification of Option 1.

The Commission is divided on the issue of whether patients should b3 notified concerning errors in the administration of rcdiopharmaceuticals where no administration was intended and where the threshold for regarding the event as a misadministration is not reached.

Commissioner Remick recommends patient notification in these cases.

He would not place the NRC in the position of notifying the patient, but would require the licensee to notify the patient's physician within 30 days of the Commissioner Rogers would require notification if the Grror.

SECY NOTE:

THIS SRM AND SECY-94-027 ARE ENFORCEMENT RELATED AND WILL BE LIMITED TO NRC UNLESS THE COMMISSION DETERMINES OTHERWISE.

Q_ efo.f t ff)h Ew f 2g' m-

..a a

f individual had not been referred by a physician for a medical procedure involving materials or devices which the NRC regulates.

In such a case, for regulatory purposes, he would consider the individual to be a member of the public rather than a patient.

The Chairman and Commissioner de Planque would not require licensees to notify the individual of an unintended dose if the, threshold for a misadministration (i.e., 5 rem effective dose equivalent or 50 rem dose equivalent to any individual organ) is not exceeded.

The proposed rulemaking should specifically seek public comment on the notification issue and on whether there are practical ways to apply 10 CFR Part 20 to such a situation as that described in SECY-94-027 without defeating the policies behind Part 35's definition of the term " misadministration".

For example, the e

staff should seek comment on whether notification, if required, l

would implicitly impose recordkeeping and procedural requirements upon licensees beyond those explicitly set forth in 10 CFR Part 35.

In the interim period until the rulemaking is completed, Part 35 requirements should be followed when the unintended dose exceeds the threshold for a misadministration.

In this particular case, the Conmission (with all Commissioners agreeing) would not require the individual to be notified.

The staff should continue to exercise enforcement discretion until the rulemaking is completed.

The proposed rule should be forwarded for Commission review and approval.

(EDO.)

(RES/0E)

(SECY Suspense:

10/21/94) 9400099 cc:

The Chairman Commissioner Rogers Commissioner Remick Commissioner de Planque OGC OCA OIG OE

...