ML20128Q003

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 34 to License DPR-75
ML20128Q003
Person / Time
Site: Salem PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 05/17/1985
From:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Shared Package
ML20128Q000 List:
References
NUDOCS 8506040040
Download: ML20128Q003 (2)


Text

,.

c

-.N Ch M4 g

c UNITED STATES

[.I jy k NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 3

, 4J y.i.

WASHWGTON, D. C. 20555 h,/

SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF fiUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATEC TO AMEtiDMENT N0. 34

~? FACILITY-0PERATIt(G LICENSE NO. DPR-75 PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COM?ANY PhlLADELPnlA tLELiRiL COMPANY DELIGRV/, POWER AND LiGni COMPAfn, AND AILANTIC CliY tLECTRIC COMPAIO SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATION STATION, UNIT N0. 2 00CKET NO. 50-311 Introduction in a letter dated January 11, 1985, Public Service Electric and Gas Comoany (PSE&G) requestec changes to the Power Deper4 dent Insertion Limit-(PDIL) of the Technical Specification (Figure 3.1-1) for Sale.T Unit 2.

This change would' match the Unit 2 PDIL curves with those of Unit 1.

~

This change is requested in order to gain operational flexibility which was Icst due to reduction of rod insertion limits for Cycle 2 of Unit 2.

The

' Cycle 3 reload design has been based on the proposed PDIL and a revised centrol roc pattern (bank grouping).

The previous control rot pattern for Salem Units' I and 2 differed considerably.

The revised control rod patterr for Unit 2 would make the control rod patterns for Units 1 and 2 identical for control bank D, which is the most important control bank and almost id,entical for control bank C which is the next most important cnntrol bank.

Bank 3, the only other bank allowed in the core during power operation, must be fully v:ithdrawn prior to 20% full power.

The revision to the control rod patterns which was implemented during the Cycle 2-3 refueling outage was mace

'under tne provision of 10CFR50.59.

Evaluation and Sumary The Reload. Safety Evaluation (RSE) for Cycle 3 was performed by Westinghouse and reviewed by PSE&G.

The results of the RSE showed that the proposed PDIL do not cause the previ.ously acceptable safety limits for any incident 'tb be i

8506040040 850517 PDR ADOCK.05000311 LP PDR

.o x

- 1_ -

R"

' ::r:ed.

Fur:herat e'it was sheer :La: the current cere safe:3 Iimits 3r..

-s'i ' asqiicas}e ar.d :nt: :ha change ir ~no way crea:es the pessiotii 3 cf a

-nee 'r ci :erent accident' frcr'any accident previousiy evaluatec *cr Sa:em.

fasec-cr' ur rev; n

,d

e :.;D:M::ec in'e;rmaticr anc' te.: We;:i --

.. RSE, ne re : i croccsec ~ec- ':a; Sceci#ica:icr cha"ge ::

.; r ;,s e-

.:erran.

'r

r.,r.e

.~<.e..s._...

m

.v.

w

.2.

.a..

Er.vir nren:a1 Censicera:icr, This.arer.dment involves a ' change in the installaticn' cr use of a facility

.:ct :nsr.: i ds:ec witrir :ne restricted area as definea in 10 -CFR-Far: 2C.

ne staff has de erminec tnat-the amencment invcives no significant increase

~

in-the amounts,_and no significant change in the tyces, of any effluents' that'may_-be releasec effsite,?and that:there is no significant increase in incividual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure.

The Commission has

-previously issuec'a pr'oposec finding that this amendment involves no

~

~

sicnificart ha: arcs consiceration and there has been.no public ccmment en su:"-#indirg.

Accc-dingly thislamencment meets the eligibility criterie

~

for cateccrical exclusion set fortn in 10 CFR Sec 51.22(c';(9).

Pu rsuant ::c-10'CFR151.22(b) ne ervironmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be precarec in connection with the issuance of this areacment.

h Ccnclusion

.le'have ccr.cluded. based cr, the considerations discussed above, that:

l3.} there 'is reasonable assurance that the-health and safety of ne cutlic will not be'encangerec by ope. ration in the proposed manner, and (2't such activities will be conducted in compliance with-the D

Commission's' regulations and the issuance of this amendment will not be= inimical Lto,the common defense and security or to the health;and safety of the public.

l

. Dated: May_17, 1985 Princical Contributor:

f

. Chatterton L

.