ML20128P628
| ML20128P628 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 02/19/1993 |
| From: | Gillespie F NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| To: | Floyd S NUCLEAR ENERGY INSTITUTE (FORMERLY NUCLEAR MGMT & |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9302250031 | |
| Download: ML20128P628 (2) | |
Text
.
J.
A February 119,'1993
'Stevo Floyd-NUMARC 1776 I Street, N.W.
Suite 300 Washington, D.C.
20006.
Dear Mr. Floyd:
Thank you for your assistance in ascertaining what PRA and_ re' lated-programs-are currently ongoing or planned with the licensees and industry. -As you are-aware, we are committed to ensure that licensee's and industry's perspectives are recognized so' that a consensus is developed, to the extent possible, of -
the Regulatory Review Group's findings.
In developing our recommendations-regarding the utilization of pRA in providing-additional flexibility in the.
regulatory process, we feel.it is essential that we be cognizantiof current and planned programs. We are, therefore, interested in the scope, structure and time frame of any related program.
The areas and topics of. interest'to us.
are provided.in the enclosed Table 1.
In addition, based on available literature and the recent ANS conference in Florida, it appears there are-several innovative programs currently in place (or--planned); however, the-details of the programs are not known. This list is provided in the enclosed Table 2.
Based on our schedule, we would require this information; by March ?2,1993.
Please call me if this time frame is not workable.
Thank you for your assistance.
Original signed by Frank P. G#erp's 1
Frank P. Gillespie-Regulatory Review Group, EDO
Enclosure:
As stated DISTRIBUTION:
Central-Files-POR JSniezek FGillespie RRG Team Members
' 3 RRG R/F
(
= Ih-i,,,j/8_ s2ac.
p g,,
aaooss 2/
/93 wuaponum en '~' g x ow '1
[,/C wlat
,2022s0021,2021,-
PDR REVQP CRGNOMRC-PDR
Enclosure Table 1:
Areas and Topics Supported by PRA-PRA used in the following areas, but not limited to:
Safety impact assessment-of plant (e.g., design) modifications Identification of critical (i.e., safety significant and-insignificant) systems, components and parts Prioritization for Haintenance and Rule-related activities Identification and management of safety significant configurations-during power and/or shutdown modes Technical specification support; e.g., safety impact of extended A0Ts, LCOs and STIs Development of "living" PRA Development of plant-specific data to support PRA to determine --
-- Common cause
-- Specific component and component part failure rates
-- Failures rates of commercially procured.non-safety grade components Identification and categorization of components or parts' for gra'ded response to Maintenance Rule or graded QA Table 2 Summary of Potential Organizations Current or Planned PRA program, but not limited tn Arizona Public Service Carolina Power and Light Commonwealth Edison Duke Power Electric Power Research Institute Energy Operations Florida Power and Light Florida Power Corporation Gulf States Utilities Houston, Lighting and Power New York Power Authority Northeast Utilities Omaha Public Power' District Philadelphia Electric Company Yankee Atomic
-