ML20128N679

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests That Proprietary Slides from 930210 NRC Meeting on AP600 Modularization Be Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790. Nonproprietary Slides Encl
ML20128N679
Person / Time
Site: 05200003
Issue date: 02/08/1993
From: Liparulo N
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, DIV OF CBS CORP.
To: Borchardt R
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML19303F339 List:
References
AW-93-409, NUDOCS 9302230341
Download: ML20128N679 (40)
v • d • e


Text

_ _

^ {A s

q=

Westinghouse Energy Systems ko$$

Elecitic Corporat'on PiM24 Pentagonia 15?30-035$

AW-93 409 l

1 February 8,1993

'l

.Docurnent Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 A'ITENTION: MR. R. W. BORCHARDT APPI,1 CATION FOR WITHHOI DINO PROPRIETARY INFORMATION FROM PyBIJC DISCLOSURE

SUBJECT:

SLIDES FROM TiiE FEBRUARY 10,1993 NRC MEETING ON AP600 MODULARIZATION

Dear Mr. Ik>rchardt:

The applicaffon for withholding is submitted by Westinghouse E!cctric Corporation ("Westinghousn')

I pursuant to the pluvisions of paragraph (b)(1) of Section 2.790 of the Commission's regulations. It contains commercial strategic information proprietary to Westinghouse and customarily held in confidence.

The proprietary material for which withholding is being requested is identified in the proprietary version of the subject report. in conformance with 10CFR Section 2.790, Affidavit AW 92-409 accompanies this application for withholding setting forth the basis on which the identified proprietary information may be withheld from public disclosure.

E Accordingly, it is respectfully requested that the subject information which is proprietary to Westinghouse be withheld from public disclosure in accordance with 10CFR Section 2.790 of the Commission's regulations.

Correspondence with respect to this application for withholding or the accornpanying affidavit should reference AW 93-409 and should be addressed to the undersigned.~

Wry truly yours, A

of N. J. Uparulo, Manager Nuclear Safety And Regulatory Activities q

/nja

~

cc:

M. P. S.~emien Omce of the General Counsel, NRC L Barnett NRC (12H5) m34 9302230341 93020Ei-.

4 PDR ADOCK-05200003 A-PDR-

1 I

I COPYRIGilT NOTICE

)

The reports transmitted herewith each bear a Westinghouse copyright notice.- The NRC is permitted to i

make the number of copics of the information contained in these reports which are necessary for its internal use in connection with generic and plant specific reviews and approvals as well as the issuance, i

denial, amendment, transfer, renewal, modification, suspension, revocation, or violation of a license, j

pennit, older, or regulation subject to the requircruents of 10 CFR 2.790 regarding restilctions on public.

disclosure to the extent such information has been identified as proprietary by Westinghouse, copyright protection not withstanding. With respect to the non-proprietary versions of these reports, the NRC is

~

permitted to make the _aumber of copies beyond those necessary for its internal use which are necessary' in order to have one copy available for public viewing in the appropriate docket files in the public document room in Washington, D.C. and in local public document rooms as rnay be required by NRC regulations if the number of copics submitted is insufficient for this purpose. The NRC is not authorized to make copics for the personal use of members of the public who make use of the NRC public document --

rooms. Copics made by the NRC must include the copyright notice in all instances and the proprietary notice if the original was identified as proprietary.

I l.

k i --

CDCA

!.~

1.....

_ _ _ _, _. ~. _.

J

.8 i

s+o 4 -. -

E-4 44m J:-

D.+ =-.

a.m.h.a4 4.,4 PitOPilll?!%ItY INFORMATION NOTICE i

3 Transmitted herewith are proprietary and/or non-proprietary versions of docurnents furnished to the NRC in connection with requests for gencric and/or plant specific review and approval.

In order to conform to the requirements of 10CFR 2.790 of the commission's regulation concerning the protection of proprietary information so submitted to the NRC, the information which is proprietary in the proprietary versions is contained within brackets and where the proprietary information hs been deleted-in the non-proprietary versions on the brackets remain, the information that was contained within brackets and where the proprietary information has been deleted in the non proprietary versions only the brackets remain, the information that was contained within the brackets in the proprietary versions having been deleted. The justification for claiming the information so designated as proprietary is indicated in both versions by means of lower case letters (a) through (f) contained within parentheses located as a superscript immediately following the brackets enclosing ach item of information being identified as proprietary or in the margin opposite such information. Tnese lower case letters refer to the types of information Westinghouse customarily holds in confidence identified in Section_(4)(ii)(a) through (4)(11)(f) of the affidavit accompanying this transmittal pursuant to 10CFR2.790(b)(1).

l 3

p

@ Nd I

,,,.--.5 e-.,.,

,,.7-,.

,..o..,d...,_,

mm...

.__.,_ _ _...i__.. _ _ _ ______ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ __

AW.93 409 AFFIDAVJT, e

COMMONWEALT11 OF PENNSYLVANIA:

l t

ss-COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY:

Before me, the undersigned authority, personally appeared Peter J. Morris, who, being by me dul" sworn according to law, deposes and says that he is authorized to execute this Affidavit on behalf of Westinghouse Electric Corporation (" Westinghouse") and that the averments of fact set forth in this Affidavit are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief Vs A 5

Peter J. Morris Manager Strategic Safety and Regulatory issues Sworn to and subscribed before me this -

day of Y//phuA*4-

.1993 O

- h.

Notary Public hiaises -.

%M Ptkt-.rmyPubir LbroovaehMe:twycee f -

W hon E4vec Doc.14,,e nata.P m paw m a m m i

07%A

~

,,---.,-.;,-,,-..-.,, ~..

,,--.,,:n.

- - - -,i:

, L -,

AW.93-409 (1)

I am Manager, Strategic Safety and Regulatory issues, in the Nuclear and Advanced Technology Division, of the Westinghouse Electric Corporation and as such, I have been specifically delegated the function of reviewing the proprietary information sought to be withheld from public disclosure in connection with nuclear power plant licensing and rulemaking proceedings, and am authorized to apply for its withholding on behalf of the Westinghouse Energy Systems Business Unit.

(2)

I am making this Affidavit in conformance with the provisions of 10CFR Section 2.790 of the Commission's regulations and in conjunction with the Westinghouse application for withholding accompanying this Affidavit.

(3)

I have persor'al knowledge of the criteria and procedures utilized by the Westinghouse Energy.

Systems Business Unit in designating informath a as a trade secret, privileged or as confidential commercial or financial information.

(4)

Purs iant to the provisions of paragraph (b)(4) of Section 2.790 of the ConWon's regulations, the following is furnished for consideration by the Commission in determining whether the information sought to be withheld from public disclosure st,old be withheld.

(i)

The information sought to be withheld from public disclosure is owned and has been held in confidence by Westinghouse.

(ii)

The information is of a type customarily held in confidence by Westinghouse and not customarily disclosed to the public. Westinghouse has a rational basis for determining the types of information customarily held in confidence by it and, in that amncetion, utilites a system to determine when and whether to hold certain types ofinformation in confidence, The application of that system and the substance of that system constitutes Westinghouse policy and provides the rational basis required.

Under that system, information is held in confidence if it falls in one or more of several types, the release of which might result in the loss of an existing or potential competitive advantage, as follows:

m

5 AW.93 409 (a)

The information reveals the distinguishing aspects of a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.) where prevention of its use by any of Westinghouse's competitors without llcense from Westinghouse constitutes a l

competitive economic advantage over other companies.

8 (b)

It consists of supporting riata, including test data, relative to a procca (or compment, structure, tool, method, etc.), the application of which data securcs a competitive economic advantage, e.g., by optimization or improved marketability.

(c)

Its use by a competitor would reduce his expenditure of resources or improve his competitive p>sition in the design, manufacture, shipment, installation, assurance of quality, or licensing a similar product.

L (d)

It reveals cost or price information, production capacities, budget levels, or commercial str9tegies of Westinghouse, its customers or supplicts.

r t

(c)

It reveals aspects of past, present, or future Westinghouse or customer funded development plans and programs of potential commercial value to Westinghouse.

(f)

It contains patentable ideas, for which patent protection may be desirable.

There are sound policy reasons behind the Westinghouse system which include the following:

(a)

The use of such information by Westinghouse gives Westinghouse a competitive advantage over its cotupctitors. It is, therefore, withheld from dissiosure to protect the Westinghouse competitive position.

(b)

It is information which is marketable in many ways. The extent to which su S information is available to competitors diminishes the Westinghouse ability to sell products and services involving the use of the information.

l-

- m 6

-r.-

a v

.w-r m-

- - =

AW 93 409 (c)

Use by our cornpetitor would put Westinghouse at a competitive disadvantage by reducing his expenditure of resources at our expense.

(d)

Each component of proprietary information pertinent to a particular competitive advantage is potentially as valuable as the total competitive advantage, if competitors acquire components of proprietary information, any one component may be the key to the entire puule, thereby depriving Westinghouse of a competitive advantage.

(c)

Unrestricted disclosure would jeopardire the position of prominence of Westinghouse in the world market, and thereby give a market advantage to the competition of those countries.

(f)

The Westinghouse capacity to invest corporate assets in research and 1

development depends upon the success in obtaining and maintaining a competitive advantage.

(iii)

The information is being transmitted to the Commission in confidence and, under the provisions of 10CFR Section 2.790, it is to be received in confidence by the Commission.

(iv)

The information sought to be protected is not available in public sources or available information has not been previously employed in the same original manner or method to the best of our knowledge and belief.

(v)

Enclosed is Letter ET NRC-93-3817, February 1993, being transmitted by Westinghouse Electric Corporation (E letter and Application for Withholding Proprietary In ormation from Public Disclosure, N. J. Liparulo (W), to r

Mr. R. W. Borchardt, Office of NRR. The proprietary information as submitted for use by Westinghouse Electric Corporation is in response to questions concerning the AP600 plant and the associated design certification application and is expected to be applicable in other licensee submittals in response to certain NRC requirements for justification of licensing advanced nuclear power plant designs.

I, i

. 0196A

.~

AW 93 409 This information is part of that which will enable Westinghouse to:

(a)

Demonstrate the design and safety of the AP600 Passive Safety Systems.

(b)

Establish applicab!c verification testing methods.

(c)

Design Advanced Nuclear Power Plants that meet NRC requirements..

(d)

Establish technical and licensing approaches for the AP600 that will ultimately result in a certified design.

(c)

Assist customers in obtaining NRC approval for future plants.

Further this information has substantial commercial value as follows:

(a)

Westinghouse plans to sell the use of similar information to its customers for purposes of meeting NRC requhrments for advanced plant lleenses.

(b)

Westinghouse can sell support and defense of the technology to its custom < s in the licensing process.

Public disclosure of this proprietary information is likely to cause substantial harm to the competitive position of Westinghouse because it would enhance the ability of competitors to provide similar advanced nuclear power designs and licensing defense services for cornmercial power reactors without commensurate expenses. Also, public disclosure of the information would enable others to use the information to meet NRC requirements for licensing documentation without purchasing the right to use the information.

De development of the technology described in part by the information is the result of applying the results of many years of experience in an intensive Westinghouse effort and the expenditure of a considerable sum of money.

07%A

.l

AW 93 409 in order for competitom of Westinghouse to duplicate this information, similar 4

technical programs would have to be performed and a significant manpower effort, having the requisite talent an,d experience, would have to be expended for developing analytical methods and receiving NRC approval for those methods.

Further the depment sayeth not.

onu

i l

NRC/ WESTINGHOUSE MEETING AGENDA 2-10 93 AP600 STRUCTURAL MODULES CONTAINMENT INTERNAL STRUCTURES 1.

General Description of Structural Modules (R.Orr) 2.

Structural Module Behavior (R.Orr) 3.

CIS Design Loads (R.Orr) 4.

Procedures for Design and Fabrication (K. Gross) 5.

Design Examples (K. Gross) 6.

Seismic Margin Assessment (R.Orr) 7.

Summary (R.Orr) 1 J

l STRUCTURAL MODULES STEEL FABRICATION IN SHOP AND SITE SUB-ASSEMBLY AREA PERMITS PARALLEL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND REDUCES OVERALL SCHEDULE.

SHOP AND SUBASSEMBLY AREA WORK MORE PRODUCTIVE,.

BETTER SUPERVISED, HIGH QUALITY THAN SAME WORK IN CONTAINMENT STEEL PLATE FORM MODULES (L-MODULES) USED TO FORM VOID SPACES IN MASS CONCRETE BASEMAT STEEL PLATE STRUCTURAL MODULES (M-MODULES) USED FOR WALLS AND FLOORS ABOVE THE BASEMAT STRUCTURAL M MODULES ARE FILLED WITH CONCRETE WHERE RADIATION SHIELDING IS REQUIRED STRUCTURE IS DESIGNED AS A STEEL STRUCTURE WITH SEISMIC ANALYSIS USING COMPOSITE STIFFNESS um. an.

5 9

l 1

L

1. emloDUCDON AND GENERAL DESCRIM;,

llevtalen: 0 Reec#ve:06/26/92

.. ~

GS QQ i,

IWestinsboose Pr,queiary) a

[Pnmded m*r m.param ccmr)

Rgue 1.2-13 Nuclear island General Arrangement Section S B 3 Westinghouse

]

()

o-

\\

.r-i 5

g a_

I i

ke B

I a

8 8

j[

5J

]l

)

d.

1 e

G t

o e '<

a i

+

  • t 9

6.

LC e.e 9:

Vi Vi 1-

+

. d. i ty

. l' l

C A

4 m

.gw

'4 3o.

x

~ '

DESIGN OF COPjTAINMENT INTERIOR STRUCTURES -

O CONCRETE UP TO - ELEVATION 83'0' (BOTTOM : OF STEAM GENERATOR COMPARTMENTS)llSE REINFORCED CONCRETE AND ACTS AS INTERIOrt BASEMAT O

LOADS : FROM - INTERIOR 1 STRUCTURES ARE : TRANSFERRED THROUGH-CONTAINMENT-VESSEL 4 BOTTOM HEAD TO EXTERIOR CONCRETE THATc EMBEDS THE HEAD UP TO

- ELEVATION 82' O

STRUCTURES INSIDE CONTAINMENT ABOVE: ELEVATION:83' ARE STEEL MODULES WHICH ARE EMBEDDED IN REINFORCED CONCRETE EXTENDING.. ABOVE ELEVATION: - 83'..

. THIS EMBEDMENT-(BETWEEN-ELEVATIONS-. 83' TO L107'2')i TRANSFERS LOADS FROM-THE MODULES TO THE INTERIOR t

BASEMAT.-

l~

j.

It i.

I I-M ei.

+

)

3.

g

,G

,__4 m

r-4 w,-m

-a A

-c o

=

4

,v

- 3 L__l f ((

P

}

i.

o e

I I

B I,

3 1

1 I

h f

1 1

oJ1.

' ~ ~ '

O C

L i

I M1 m

T at M

nA w

$e d

O

__m--,

y*

?

g.

fg} }'

o

= - -

a y

l

I -$['

-;- t-;;

~

W..

hh

~

v 1

e

_m 4

+

b 5

s 9

+

- 8

+-

l i

m.

E u

4

,f'.

a lJ.

r

-.l 1

" l

+4p; 4

m M

C St.

e A

l l

l w

I l

1 d.

m a

0 RevWon: 0 E8ects: 06/26/92 ~

k i

- 1 l

Margbome Picpneiny)

[Pamded under wpene cerer]

R gure 12 1.

hieor 1siond General Arrangemoni

$*ction A A m

WgSthgh00$8 1,2-34

4

~

J 11p"1

~

a

)

(

\\

t l

d E

e.

G t,

u y le 12

+j o'

n m

6

4

.s

~~ lt, C I.

e SM Mgam 3A 6(Stwa 2 o(3)

M-1 Shuctwol Module P3A 32

-(

' - ~ ~ -, _,, _. _ _

M Q,0 4.

4

  • %e.

y!)awrea.

I

  • ',0-e.

.I

'..I*.

;t

., 3 et g d.-

& "i

^T I

e};sj

.O i

I 1

2 0,

7

E 9

\\

N-R R

E il 8

5 g

2 7

x w

i

(

a

a REFERENCES FOR STRUCTURAL MODULES REFERENCE SCOPE ASCE, Composite and Mixed Construction, Proceedings of the Multiple papers en composite construction U.SJJaoan Joint Seminar, July 18-20, 1984 ASCE, Composite Construction in Steel and Concrete, Proceedings Multiple papers on composite construction of an Engineering Foundation Conference, New Hampshire, June 7-12,1987.

H.Takeuchi, ll.Okamura, " Composite Structure of Concrete and Steel Concrete slab with stiffened steel bottom plate -

Plate", IABSE Symposium, Paris-Versailles,1987.

design of shear connectors T. Fukumoto, B. Kato, et al, " Concrete Filled Steel Bearing Walls,"

Shear and compression tests of various configurations IABSE Symposium, Paris-Versailles,1987.

of plates and shear connectors R.Narayan, ll.D. Wright, II.R. Evans, R.W. Francis. " 1. mad Tests on Bending tests on curved beams with stod shear Double Skin Composite Girders", Proceedings - Composite connectors Construction in Steel and Concrete,1987, Published by ASCE.

A.Kaneuji, Y.Okuda, K.Hara, H.Masumoto, " Feasibility Study of Overview of steel plate construction approach Concrete Filled Steel (SC) Structure for Resctor Building",10th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology,1989.

H. Akiyama, H. Sekimoto, M. Tanaka, K. Inoue, M. Fukihara, Y.

Tests of a concrete lilied steel plate matel of typical Okuda, "1/10th Scale Model Test of Inner Concrete Structure PWR internal structures for cyclic loads and Composed of Concrete Filled Steel Bearing Wall",10th International comparison with similar tests for a reinforced concrete Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technolegy,1989.

malet.

H.Akiyama, H.Sekimoto, M.Fukihara, K.Nakanashi, K.Hara, "A Cyclic compression and shear tests of concrete filled Compression and Shear Loading Test of Concrete Filled Steel steel plate wall models.

Bearing Wall", lith International Conference on Stnetural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, ?991.

l

-l LOAD TESTS ON DOUBLE SKIN COMPOSITE-GRIDERS R. Narayanan, H.O. Wright, H. R. Evans and R.'W. Francis DOUBLE R]N coMpogrTE GIRDEA3 3es h

w n

E E

V.

3 P

3 in fka tits n Muun Iw R

M fRA STtm x 18Sasa Lf3Rt1 22 f16 iTime aemmitm @

( MEMBY M CM w"1 MitI

f. n

. u,nq' I ?

'f*' '?j'??g wi N

I AM fXs A 2 '"'Tinas a surma

,-- - cToas

.g' i.

4 i

400 g.

Collapse Load (Calculated)

~ k

Lead 14C 300

^

V q

,2E f 2l['ff

.I y

2 200 5

3., f.

e B

Plate-r *

+,

"t - 1 )

, 100

~

ll 1

.E~

o

-*l 8*

  • 1440' J

0

/ g I

p,

/

. 43

~I,

[

i o-I -,-r-1

(

-200 p

/p Backling

I' l-+

j

[.

gf Plate-

.g

.g.

'-300

.v

-400 -20

-10 0

10

. 20.

30' Displacement 3(mm)-

. Thickness of :Plata (t) 3.2 nun Stud Pich (8) 320mm

- (8/t) 100 Dimension of Specimen:

, Relationship? of. Shearing Load;and LDisplacement

W'"

Stiffening

    • 1 Cross Section StructureT U Method

{cm 2[

884 Non Non

' ' ' ' ~ '

Suffenmg l

-l SC 200 200K Stiffening dsw T

et -22 o

3/c,oncretp g ;

One j

_t (ns,,,piar, insen Plate l, +l SC 100 1-PL-3.2)

A.A sect.on 100k P

Tm YP Y

'hL I

M Plates l'

l SC 67 o

(

.2) 67X

+

+

l

^

^

se n,i,

.8 8 4

[

lQ [ _l SC 67 (4-L50x fN'}>

~

  • 50x4)

Headed Ap,.

_ o.

~ " ~ ~

s j Apj Stud g""~"]

SC 35 plgg ioo 884 ioa i

32o100 35S taoi 52 Fig. 3. Specimen for compression Test Steel

{,1v]

Steel 100 Insert Plate A

P 100S (1.PL-3.2)

?

g (sa mi.,

PL -i9) al

^

L-I N* g r8 oncrete OC

'*J OC(Com.)

Concrete

. cet -3 2 x n _so I,,..l1C IC(Shear)

?.~

g oac;-

l c

g g' L,g

  • Concrete :Fc240 Surface Plate : PL-3.2 no Side Plate : PL-22(Com.),PL-19(Shear)

A A s.c g,gg Fig. 4 Specimen for Shear Test

~

.A

~

y a

1/800 t1200 11100 5/t=1150 tfgooli400ti200 1#100

&a-tM i,gte400, yon

' t,too a a : t.30 3

z-l14Q..

z~

<k

  • f' m. ~. _ _ _ l ' '

2 4g z

3g

~ ~

2 y

i 2 10-

'(~~~,

[ 10 f ' ~....,,

[ 10-l

[

D. _ ;U""

((

f-~

_.e.

1 1

N i L_ 1..

2 x1 i

o o

o l

l l ~W-67 K N

.J

.l

_}

l t

~~

~ g y

_. A lI00K l 67K l

100K 2

l g6- [.#

h j5 200K e

b' g

/

\\N E

67 A a

L OC N

E 9:P E

E g

f 0

a : Buckkng of Surface Ptate' j 35 S

  • x 100 s -

0 s

io is 0

i

,0

($

o 4

to it Ausal Displacemnt d(mm)

Axial Displacement d(mm)

Amial Disphcement 6(mm)

(a) Composite Effects

'(b) Effects of Insert Plate (c) Stif fening !!ethods

' Fig. 5 Load-Displacement Relationship for Each Parameter in Compression Tests-I!400 Itt00 tiSO A= li25 11400 1:100 tr$0 R = ls2$

f/400 11:00 t/50 R - l/25

'y U200 I

1/?00 11200 4

s' 2

[

~ ;il

\\

2 ss f

O O

s

/>

O j y

$s i

e_

i e

'- ~

. /

2 y

~

3 i

3 p

1 3

~~

~

..t 100 K

%. ' 1 A 1

- b

~'

g

'5 5

200K100 K 67 K

'5

_ 1 %,{_

{

3N 6TA 200K

~

jC

~

a L Bucking of Surface Plate

,Il l

I O

k

.O

.,o to 20 g

0 - -~

10'~" ~75~ ~ " W-Shear Displacement d(mm).

Shear Despiace nent d(mm)

Sheat Displacement d(mm) '

L(a) Composite Effects (b)-Effects of' Insert' Plate (c)' Stiffening Methods 1 Fig. 6 Load-Displacement-Relationship'for Each Parameter in. Shear' Tests-t Y

s.-- --

--.=. - -..-.x

.i i

-,.I.

.r

.-I i

.-t i.

..-3:

t l

r

.J.*.

4 1s.

a.

x.1.1:

e 32,n s._. ~.

  • ) - ~60 0 e OO e -

i

.g

=

3 o

a.

1

(:j el. <ed, g, u

2

=

s

_........r

.. r -.

.. 8

  • : =. t. '.

t

- 1

.:.r.

i.,

. t_ t -

s

...... r.

. g.

3.6

..a ta...:: :: ::. =

33..

. t e _.

6 I

g. t.

. _... 3,. s... 3 2j

%%39BS9 A

=

o

5 a

2 e

a.

F.

u e.

g

?

W p.

g

.,t i

e i:

_4 :

g m

t 7 n.C t

'I I

m

. 3. DESIGN CF STRUCTURES, COMPONENT 8, EQUIPMANT AND SYSTEMS Revision: 0 Effec *e: 06/28/92 1

Table 3.8.41 Load Combinations And 1.oad Factors For Seismic Category i Steel Structures Losd CamMaadan sad Factres Combiandon No.

1 2

3 4

5 6

7 8

9 load descripcian Dead D

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.lquid P

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 IJve L

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Eazth pressure H

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Normal reaction R,

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Nonnat thermal T

1.0 1.0 Wind o

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 W

1.0 SSE 1.0 E,

1.0 Tornado 1.0(3)

W 1.0 A a r pressure P.

1.0 1.0 1.0 Aacsdent thennal T.

(

Accidset thermal 1.0 1.0 1.0 reactions R.

^ocida P P*

1.0 1.0 1.0 i

reactions Y,

Jet F; ;

Y 1.0 1.0 Pipe impact 1.0 1.0 m

1.0 1.0 Strees i1==s(!),(4) 1.0 1.0 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.5 1.5 CoetScient Nosen:

1.

ABoweble Ensias h are per ADC - N690.

2.

Where any she senses of career loods, the coefSolest for that load shad be teksa as are unless is c= Y'

" shut the load is always presses or ocaers Iceds.

  • y wish the other 3.

la no insemane sheD lhe eBowuWe stress exceed 0.7P, la exial 4

nor 0.7P, times the rado of the pleano so siende section asodulus for teneum plus M r.

i 3.8 31

.i l

9

-i

3. DESIGN OF STRUCTURES, COMPON9fTS, EQUIPMENT AND SYSTFMS Revision: 0 Effective: 06/26/92 Table 3.8.4 2 Load Combinadons And Load Factors For Seismic Category 1 -

Concrete Structures Imd C-M-We and Factors C - u - % No.

1 2

3 4

5 s-7 8

9 1.ced description Dead D

1.4 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.05 1.M Uqmd P

1.4 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.05 1.L '

Uve L

1.7 1.7 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.3.

Eanh H

1.7 1.7 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.3 Normal reaction R,

1.7 1.7 1.0 1.0 Normal thermal T,

1.0 1.0 1.3 1.3 Winc' W

1.7 1.3

' 1.3 SSE 1.3 E,

1.0 Tornado W

1.0(3) t 1.0 A h t pressure Pa 1.5 1.25 1.0 Amdant thermal Ta Accident thermal 1.0 1.0 1.0 g

W R,

1.0 1.0 1.0 -

Accident pipe rA Y,

1.0 1.0 Jet impingement Y

Pipe impact 1.0 1.0 m

1.0 1.0 e.

Noems:

8

. Design is in accordenes with AC1349 Strength Design N for all toed =' ' a 2.

mee say to.4 r d em the othese of oc.ar lands, the w., "; oostfums ihr that load shall be tab ac 0.9 ifit een as " est the load is always present or occurs W with the other toeda. Othervlas Seumac loade %g mostileiset ihr the load sisa!! be taken as aer 3.

3.8-32

.g' 4

z

. l 4

AP6004 STRUCTURES - PRELIMINARY c

0 HARD ROCK-SITE q

0 SSE IS CRITICAL LOAD IN DESIGN 0F-STRUC 0

MEAN CAPACITY ESTIMATED BY APPLYING

. FACTORS TO SSE MARGIN FACTORS LEADING TO INCREASED Cj O

Of STRUCTURE INTERACTIOM FACTOR- (ACTUAL-LOAD CODE FACTOR-(CODE ALLOWABLE IS LOWE MATERIAL FACTOR- (ACTUAL VS SPECIFIED,LDYNAM O

MARGIN FACTORS LEADING TO REDUCED-SE DAMPING FACTOR ANALYSIS FACTOR SIUCTRAL SNAPE FACTOR

) '

INELASTIC RESPONSE-FACTOR 0

ENGINEERING JUDGEMENT FACTOR I

1

(

),

1

,vw-o

---r.

4

$s f0 V$[>">'tT*ff IMAGE EVALUATION

/

'fD j%

j.[?.4 %

f d

3, g

TEST TARGET (MT-3)

\\/

Qt ll,,//

%e v

%++

44 l.0 E2 M y @ B11 1.1 EL"EM l$ l.8 M===

1.25 1.4

[,m.6 i

r_ m 4

150mm 4

6" N?%,

/$

4e,.* A,' p. /4 4sjy /g//,y,-

3

-x "ey V.

/'

g

,4 f(4 f %

/

[

j 4ls4 t;

4 r

g9 2 '*m=by_ ?,3 3

' Ah a

I*

m ;,

STRUCTURAL MODULE DESIGN DEVELOPMENT O

DESIGN CRITERIA ESTABLISHED AND DOCUMENTED IN SSAR O

PRELIMINARY DESIGN DESCRIBED IN SSAR; DETAILED DESIGN IS PART OF FIRST-OF-A-KIND ENGINEERING O

CONSERVATIVE DESIGN APPROACH IS SUPPORTED-BY EXISTING CODES AND TEST DATA 1

O SEISMIC MARGIN IS SUCH THAT THE CONTAINMENT INTERIOR STRUCTURE HCLPF EXCEEDS THOSE OF-MANY COMPONENTS AND DOES NOT CONTRIBUTE TO GEISMIC RISK O

ADDITIONAL TESTING COULD QUANTIFV MARGIN AND PERMIT RELAXATION OF DESIGN CRITERIA 12TTM: ram 020003

.A:

w i

i 1

+

STRUCTURAL MODULES DESIGN EXAMPLE REFUELING CAVITY

. WEST WALL Presentation Material includes 13 Pages of Proprietary.information.

m

,._yJ.

z.

't STRUCTURE MODULES PROCEDURES FOR DESIGN-Presentation Material includes 21 Pages of Propr";^ y Information.

P f

4

'V

~

4

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20128N679&oldid=4255540"