3F0585-20, Application for Amend to License DPR-72,consisting of Tech Spec Change Request 136,correcting Action Statement of Section 3.1.2.9 to Require Unit Be Brought to Cold Shutdown If Sys Cannot Be Restored to Operable Status.Fee Paid

From kanterella
(Redirected from ML20128N022)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Application for Amend to License DPR-72,consisting of Tech Spec Change Request 136,correcting Action Statement of Section 3.1.2.9 to Require Unit Be Brought to Cold Shutdown If Sys Cannot Be Restored to Operable Status.Fee Paid
ML20128N022
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River 
Issue date: 05/28/1985
From: Westafer G
FLORIDA POWER CORP.
To: Harold Denton
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20128N026 List:
References
3F0585-20, 3F585-20, NUDOCS 8506030147
Download: ML20128N022 (5)


Text

=

<?

o I

y s'

Power C ORPO H ATIO N May 28,1985 3F0585-20 Mr. H. R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20535

Subject:

Crystal River Unit 3 Docket No.30-302 Operating License No. DPR-72 Technical Specification Change Request No.136

Dear Sir:

Florida Power Corporation hereby submits the enclosed three (3) originals and forty (40) copies of Technical Specification Change Request No. 136 requesting amendment to Appendix A of Operating License No. DPR-72. As part of this request, the proposed replacement page for Appendix A is enclosed.

This amendment request corrects the action statements of Specification 3.1.2.9 to require the unit be brought to cold shutdown instead of only hot shutdown, if systems cannot be restored to operable status.

An amendment application fee, check number 722975 of one hundred fifty dollars

($150), as required by 10 CFR 170, has been included with this Change Request.

Sincerely,

/

G. R. Westafer Manager, Nuclear Operations Licensing and Fuel Management PGH/feb B506030147 B50529 PDR ADOCK 05000302 Enclosures P

PDR cc:

Dr. J. Nelson Grace Regional Administrator, Region II O

Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street N.W., Suite 2900 Atlanta, GA 30323 q;50@

h pl@I GEN ERAL OFFICE 3201 Thirty fourth Street South e P.O. Box 14042, St. Petersburg, Florida 33733 e 813-866-5151

STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS G. R. Westafer states that he is the Manager, Nuclear Operations Licensing and Fuel Management for Florida Power Corporation; that he is authorized on the part of said company to sign and file with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission the information attached hereto; and that all such statements made and matters set forth therein are true and correct to the best of his knowledge,information, and belief.

Manager, Nuclear Op/

G. R. Westafer erations Licensing and Fuel Management Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public in and for the State -

and County above named, this 28th day of May,1985.

~ /m Notary Public Notary Public, State of Florida at Large, My Commission Expires: November 12,1986

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF

)

)

DOCKET No. 50-302 FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE-G. R. Westafer deposes and says that the following has been served on the Designated State Representative and the Chief Executive of Citrus County, Florida, by deposit in the United States mall, addressed as follows:

Chairman, Administrator -

Board of County Commissioners Radiological Health Services of Citrus County Department of Health and Citrus County Courthouse Rehabilitative Services Inverness, FL 32650 1323 Winewood Blvd.

Tallahassee, FL 32301 A copy of Technical - Specification Change Request No. 136 requesting amendment to Appendix A of Operating Licensing No. DPR-72.

FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION 1

3

'G.'R. 'Westalef Manager, Nuclear Oper/

ations Licensing and Fuel Management SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME THIS 28th DAY OF MAY 1985.

i I

M<b

  1. Notary Public

' Notary Public, State of Florida at Large My Commission Expires: November 12,1986 t-(NOTARIAL SEAL) i l

[

y.

o FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302/ LICENSE NO. DPR-72 REQUEST NO.136, REVISION O BORATED WATER SOURCES LICENSE DOCUMENT INVOLVED: Technical Specifications PORTION:

3.1.2.9 Borated Water Sources DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:

Revise the action statements of Specification 3.1.2.9 to require cold shutdown instead of hot shutdown, if systems cannot be restored to operable.

REASON FOR REQUEST:

The current Specification incorrectly requires that the unit be taken to hot shutdown. This action would not place the unit in a mode in which the specification does not apply.

Replacing " Hot Shutdown" with " Cold Shutdown" corrects this Specification.

EVALUATION OF REQUEST:'

This is purely an administrative change to correct an error in the current Technical Specifications.

l l

l l

i l

l l

l

FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302/ LICENSE NO. DPR-72 REQUEST NO.136, REVISION 0 SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATIONS DETERMINATION DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT REQUEST:

This Technical Specification Change Requests proposes the requirement to be in " Hot Shutdown" be revised to be in " Cold Shutdown" for Specification 3.1.2.9.

Specification 3.1.2.9 requires that inoperable borated water sources be restored to operable within a specified time. If operability cannot be restored, a shutdown is initiated. However, the current Specification does not require that the plant be taken to a non-applicable mode (Cold Shutdown) as most other specifications would require. This Amendment would correct this inconsistency.

BASIS FOR PROPOSED NO SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATION DETERMINATION:

The Commission has provided guidance in the form of examples of Amendments that are not considered likely to involve significant hazards considerations (48 FR 14870). Example (i) states "(i) a purely administrative change to the Technical Speficiations: For example, a change to achieve consistency throughout the Technical Specifications, correction of an error or a change in nomenclature."

Example (1) above, encompasses this Technical Specification change to correct Specification 3.1.2.9. Therefore, since this application for Amendment involves a change that is similar to the examples for which no significant hazards considerations exist, we propose that this application for Amendment involves no significant hazards consideration.