ML20128M149
| ML20128M149 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 07/01/1985 |
| From: | Thomas C Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Klapproth J GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20128M154 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8507110587 | |
| Download: ML20128M149 (3) | |
Text
.
July 1, 1985 Mr. J. F. Klapproth Principal Licensing Engineer Nuclear Technologies and Fuel Division General Electric Company 175 Curtner Avenue San Jose, California 95125
Dear Mr. Klapproth:
SUBJECT:
ACCEPTANCE FOR REFERENCING 0F LICENSING TOPICAL REPORT NEDE-22290, SUPPLEMENT P, " SAFETY EVALUATION OF THE GENERAL ELECTRIC ADVANCED LONGER LIFE CONTROL R0D ASSEMBLY" We have completed our review of the subject topical report submitted by the General Electric Company (GE) by letter dated February 20, 1985. We find the report to be acceptable for referencing in license applications to the extent specified and under the limitations delineated in the report and the associated NRC evaluation, which is enclosed. The evaluation defines the basis for acceptance of the report.
We do not intend to repeat our review of the natters described in the report and found acceptable when the report appears as a reference in license applications, except to assure that the material presented is applicable to the specific plant involved. Our acceptance applies only to the matters described in the report.
In accordance with procedures established in NUREG-0390, it is requested that GE publish accepted versions of this report, proprietary and non-proprietary, within three months of receipt of this letter. The accepted versions shall incorporate this letter and the enclosed evaluation between the title page and the abstract. The accepted versions shall include an -A (designating accepted) following the report identification symbol.
Should our criteria or regulations change such that our conclusions as to the acceptability of the report are invalidated, GE and/or the applicants referencing the topical report will be expected to revise and resubmit their respective documentation, or subrit justification for the continued effective applicability of the topical report without revision of their respective documentation.
Sincerely, Original signed by Cecil 0. Thomas, Chief 6507110587 850701 Standardization and Special PDR TOPRP ENVQE Projects Branch P
C Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
l As stated
,p DISTRIRUTION:
5 Central,FileI ^
DMoran PNoonan
.M )'
/
l SSPB Reading HBerkow PDR 1/ v
/
DCS RDiggs CThonas
~
/
- SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE SHEET DL:SSPB*
DL:SSPB*
DL:SSPB*
PNoonan:ac C% +a n HBerkow
,,.s 06/23/85 06/25/85 07/01/85 07/ / /85
Mr. J. F. Klapproth Principal Licensing Engineer Nuclear Technologies and Fuel Division General Electric Company 175 Curtner Avenue San Jose, California 95125
Dear Mr. Klapproth:
SUBJECT:
ACCEPTANCE FOR REFERENCING OF LICENSING TOPICAL REPORT NEDE-22290, SUPPLEMENT 2, " SAFETY EVALUATION OF THE GENERAL ELECTRIC ADVANCED LONGER LIFE CONTROL R0D ASSEMBLY" We have completed our review of the subject topical report submitted by i
the General Electric Company (GE) by letter February 20, 1985. We find the report to be acceptable for referencing in license applications to the extent specified and under the limitations delineated in the report and the associated NRC evaluation, which is enclosed. The evaluation defines the basis for acceptance of the report.
We do not intend to repeat our review of the matters described in the report and found acceptable when the report appears as a reference in license applications, except to assure that the material presented is applicable to the specific plant involved. Our acceptance applies only to the matters described in the report.
In accordance with procedures established in NUREG-0390, it is requested that GE publish accepted versions of this report, proprietary and non-proprietary, within three months of receipt of this letter. The accepted versions shall incorporate this letter and the enclosed evaluation between the title page and the abstract. The accepted versions shall include an -A (designating accepted) following the report identification symbol.
Should our criteria or regulations change such that our conclusions as to the acceptability of the report are invalidated, GE and/or the applicants referencing the topical report will be expected to revise and resubmit their respective documentation, or submit justification for the continued effective applicability of the topical report without revision of their respective documentation.
Sincerely, Original signed by Cecil 0. Thomas, Chief Standardization and Special Projects Branch Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
As stated DISTRIBUTION t
Central File DMoran PNoonan SSPB Reading HRerkow PDR RDiggs
- DCS, CThomas
(
kdPh DL%PD DL:SSRP dnan:tm n
HBerkow CThomas
/85
/85 Of///85 09/o//85
- "49
,g g
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION e
o 7,;
aj WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 July 1, 1985 Mr. J. F. Klapproth Principal Licensing Engineer Nuclear Technologies and Fuel Division Ceneral Electric Company 175 Curtner Avenue San Jose, California 95125
Dear Mr. Klapproth:
SUBJECT:
ACCEPTANCE FOR REFERENCING OF LICENSIFG TOPICAL REPORT NEDE-P2290, SUPPLEMENT ?, " SAFETY EVALUFION OF THE GENERAL ELECTRIC ADVANCED LONGER LIFE CONTROL R0D ASSEMBLY" We have completed our review of the subject topical report subr.itted by the General Electric Company (GE) by letter dated February 20, 1985. We. find the report to be acceptable for referencing in license applications to the extent specified and under the linitations delineated in the report end the associated PRC evaluation, which is enclosed.
The evaluation defines the basis for acceptance of the report.
We do not intend to repeat our review of the matters described in the report and found accepteble vben the report apoears as a reference in license applications, except to assure that the material presented is applicable to the specific plant involved. Our acceptance applies only to the matters described in the report.
In accordance vith procedures established in NUREG-0390, it is recuested that GE publish acceoted versiens o' this report, proprietary and non-proprietary, within three months of receipt of this letter.
The accepted versions shall incorporate this letter and the enclosed evaluation between the title page and the abstract. The accepted versions shall include an -A (designating accepted) followiro the report identification symbol.
Should our criteria or regulations change such that nur conclusions as to the acceptability of the report are invalidated, GE and/or the applicants referencing the topical report will be expected to revise and resubnit their respective documentation, or submit justification for the continued effective applicability of the topical report without revision of their respective documentation.
Sincerely, Ga2 O. %=
cecil 0. Thomas, Chief Standardization and Special Projects Brarch Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
As stated
.