ML20128L666
| ML20128L666 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 10/11/1996 |
| From: | Stolz J NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| To: | James Knubel GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20128L671 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC-M93777, NUDOCS 9610150158 | |
| Download: ML20128L666 (4) | |
Text
- - - - - - _. - - -.. - - - - - - - - - - - - -.
Mr. James Knubel October 11, 1996 j'
Vice President and Director - TMI GPU Nuclear Corpsration a
Post Office Box 480 j'
Middletown, PA 17057-0480 l'
SUBJECT:
SAFETY EVALUATION OF THIRD 10-YEAR INTERVAL FOR THE PUMP AND VALVE INSERVICE TESTING PROGRAM, THREE MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1 (TAC NO. M93777) i l
Dear Mr. Knubel:
By a letter dated Se'ptember 21, 1995, GPU Nuclear Corporation (GPUN) submitted l
its Third 10-Year Interval Inservice Testing (IST) Program for Pumps and Valves. The staff had conference calls with your staff on February 12, May 6, and August 22, 1996, discussing the proposed relief requests.
GPUN submitted a revision to the third 10-year 151 submittal dated May 23, 1996, which made the following changes to the 10-year program submittal:
revised Relief i
{
Requests P1, P2, P3, and PG3; withdrew Relief Requests PG1, PG2, V1, V2, V3, V4, and V5; and added Relief Request P4.
Evaluations of Relief Requests P1, j
P2, P3, P4, PG3, and VG1 are included in the enclosed Safety Evaluation (SE).
The staff has reviewed the proposed relief requests referenced above and other relevant sections of the IST program against the requirements of Section XI of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code pursuant.to paragraph 50.55a of Part 50 to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations. The results of the review are provided in the attached SE. This
{
completes our rview of this issue and, accordingly, we are closing TAC No.
M93777.
e, I
l Sincerely, Original signed by:
i John F. Stolz, Director Project Directorate I-3
}
Division of Reactor Projects - I/II j
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 4
Docket No. 50-289 l
Enclosure:
Safety Evaluation i
i cc w/ enc 1:
See next page DISTRIBUTLON:
1
' Docket Fi'e.-
JZwolinski PUBLIC ~
JStolz Nh i
PD1-3 Plant PTressler i
FMiraglia/AThadani OGC
\\J RZimmerman ACRS RSpessard PEselgroth, RI j
SVarga
\\
g
- DOCUMENT NAME
- G:\\NORRIS\\M93777.TMI Ta seceive a copy of this despient/hedeses in the bes: 'C' = Copy without setechment/ enclosure
- E' = Copy with attachment / enclosure
- N' = No copy 0FFICE PD)i2dPR/
l PD3-3:LA lG PDI-00 l
l l
4 NAME JNorris) N PTresslefWi JStol & _
DATE 10h0/96 10/ 9 /96 /
10/// /96 '
0FFICIAL RECORD COPY 1
9610150158 961011 PDR ADOCK 05000289 f
P pop i
pug UNITED STATES g
Ij NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 2
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20061H1001 October 11, 1996 Mr. James Knubel Vice President and Director - TMI GPU Nuclear Corporation Post Office Box 480 4
i Middletown, PA 17057-0480
SUBJECT:
SAFETY EVALUATION OF THIRD 10-YEAR INTERVAL FOR THE PUMP AND VALVE INSERVICE TESTING PROGRAM, THREE MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1 (TAC N0. M93777)
Dear Mr. Knubel:
By a letter dated September 21, 1995, GPU Nuclear Corporation (GPUN) submitted its Third 10-Year Interval Inservice Testing (IST) Program for Pumps and Valves.
The staff had conference calls with your staff on February 12, May 6, and August 22, 1996, discussing the proposed relief requests.
GPUN submitted a revision to the third 10-year IST submittal dated May 23, 1996, which made j
the ! allowing changes to the 10-year program submittal:
revised Relief Requests P1, P2, P3, and PG3; withdrew Relief Requests PG1, PG2, VI, V2, V3, V4, and V5; and added Relief Request P4.
Evaluations of Relief Requests P1, P2, P3, P4, PG3, and VG1 are included in the enclosed Safety Evaluation (SE).
The staff has reviewed the proposed relief requests referenced above and other relevant sections of the IST program against the requirements of Section XI of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code pursuant to paragraph 50.55a of Part 50 to Title 10 of the Code of federal J
Regulations. The results of the review are provided in the attached SE. This completes our rview of this issue and, accordingly, we are closing TAC No.
M93777.
Sincerely, 1
/
J n F. Stolz, Direct r P oject Directorate I-3 ivision of Reactor Projects - I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-289
Enclosure:
Safety Evaluation cc w/ enc 1: See next page I
J. Knubel Three Mile Island Nuclear Station GPU Nuclear Corporation Unit No. I cc:
Michael Ross Robert B. Borsum Director, 0&M, TMI B&W Nuclear Technologies GPU Nuclear Corporation Suite 525 P.O. Box 480 1700 Rockville Pike Middletown, PA 17057 Rockville, MD 20852 John C. Fornicola William Dornsife, Acting Director Director, Planning and Bureau of Radiation Protection Regulatory Affairs Pennsylvania Department of GPU Nuclear Corporation Environmental Resources 100 Interpace Parkway P.O. Box 2063 Parsippany, NJ 07054 Harrisburg, PA 17120 Jack S. Wetmore Dr. Judith Johnsrud Manager, TMI Regulatory Affairs National Energy Committee GPU Nuclear Corporation Sierra Club P.O. Box 480 433 Orlando Avenue Middletown, PA 17057 State College, PA 16803 Ernest L. Blake, Jr., Esquire Mr. James Knubel, Vice President Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge and Director - TMI-1 2300 N Street, NW.
GPU Nuclear Corporation Washington, DC 20037 P.O. Box 128 Forked River, NJ 08731 Chairman Board of County Commissioners of Dauphin County Dauphin County Courthouse Harrisburg, PA 17120 Chairman Board of Supervisors of Londonderry Township R.D. #1, Geyers Church Road Middletown, PA 17057 Michele G. Evans Senior Resident Inspector (TMI-1)
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O. Box 311 Middletown, PA 17057 Regional Administrator, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 a
TABLE OF CONTENTS 4
4 l
1 l.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
I 2.0 IST PROGRAM ISSUES 2
3.0 GENERAL RELIEF REQUEST 3
4 4.0 PUMP RELIEF REQUESTS 6
1, 5.0 VALVE RELIEF REQUEST 18 6.0 IST PROGRAM SCOPE SYSTEM REVIEW..................
20 1
7.0 ANOMALIES.............................
21 1
4
8.0 CONCLUSION
22 4
~
APPENDIX A:
SUMMARY
OF SUBMITTED RELIEF REQUESTS......... A-1 3
1 l
4 i
f a
d l
1
(
1 J
5 1
[
]
I J