ML20128L201

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Memorandum Clarifying LBP 85-16 Re Withdrawal of 850215 Protective Order Governing Discovery in Unit 1,per 850524 Order.Intent Was Not to Withdraw Protective Order But to Supercede Order in Part.Served on 850530
ML20128L201
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 05/30/1985
From: Bloch P
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
To:
References
CON-#285-190 79-430-06-OL, 79-430-6-OL, LBP-85-16, LBP-85-17, OL, OL-2, NUDOCS 8505310306
Download: ML20128L201 (1)


Text

TT P

9 sgRVED NAY 3 01985 LBP-85-17 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DGLKETED USNRC Before Administrative Judges:

Peter B. Bloch, Chairman

'85 MAY 30 P3:23 Dr. Kenneth A. McCollom Dr. Walter H. Jordan GFF!CE OF SECALiAo -

DOCKETING & SERVIO BRANCH

)

In the Matter of

)

Docket Nos. 50-445-OL & OL-2

)

50-446-0L & OL-2

)

TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al.')

--)

ASLBP No. 79-430-06 OL (Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station,

)

Units 1 and 2)

)

)

May 30, 1985 MEMORANDUM (Clarification of LBP 85-16)

Yesterday the parties asked us the ' following stipulated question, which was intended to clarify LBP 85-16 and which we were asked to answer "Yes or No.":

Did the Board intend in its May 24 Order to withdraw the [ February 15,1985] protective order governing discovery in the -1 docket?

The Board's answer to this question was:

No, we did not intend to withdraw the protective order.

However, we do supersede the protective order in part.

Applicants should respond to discovery requests that are likely to survive regardless of what the Staff does.

The purpos~e of the rule we are now apply-ing is to balance the cost of Applicants' responding now against

.the avoidance of delay because they do respond now.

This is a practical test.

FOR THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD p 39,g,

g PDR ADOCK 05000445 0

PDR

'f Peter B. Bloch, Chairman ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE Bethesda, Maryland M