ML20128K077
| ML20128K077 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 02/11/1993 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20128K066 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9302180061 | |
| Download: ML20128K077 (2) | |
Text
.
~
- je.m et 3g%,
UNITED STATc5 8"
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION n
,I W ASH NG T ON, D, C, 20%S k * * * * *,/
i SEE11_1 Yell)ATION 8Y THE OFF_L(f_Qf_l(l)CLEAP BEACTOR REGULMLQU Rflfl[0 TO AMENDMENT NO.169 TO FACILITY 0PERATING LICENSE NO. OPR-5.Q METR 0PQLITAN ff.110B_C0fiPR11 2
dERSEY CENTRAL POEB_1 LIGHT CQMPANY EffmSYLVANI A ELECTRIC _ COMPeS1 GPP.y_hKLIAR CORPORATION IBBEE MILE ISLAND NUELEAR STATlQfL UNIT NO,_l DOCKCT NO. 5.QaPJ!
l.0 l!ilBQDDfGJJDB By letter dated June 24, 1992, the GPU Nuclear Corporation (GPUN or the licenses) submitted a requast for a change to the Three Hilt 1sland Nuclear Station, Unit No. 1 (TMI-1) Technical Specifications (TS).
The requested change would revise TS Section 6.2.2.2.f to deleto the requicement for a separate licensed Senior Reactor Operatcr (SRO) to directly supervise 1
Irradiated fuel handling and transfer activities on site, and the retention of the requirement for a licensed SRO to directly supervise REFUELING OPERATIONS.
2,0 EVk UATION Currently, the licensee is required to have one SR0 present to directly-super"ise irradiated fuel handling and transfer activities on site and another SR0 for all unirradiated fuel handling and transfer activities to and from the Reactor Vessel.
The proposed change will require that all Refueling Operations shall be observed and directly rupervised by either a licensed SR0 or SRO limited to fuel handling who has no other concuirent responsibilities during this operation, as required by 10 CFR 50.54.
o The NRC staff concludes that the proposed change is consistent with regulatory requirem+nts. Therefore, the stif f finds the change to be acceptable.
i 3.0 5181LCONSulTATION in accordance with the Commission's regulations, the Pennsylvania State L
official was notified of the preposed issuance of the amendment. The State official had no comments.
i l
9302100061 930211 DR ADOCK 0500 9
g I.
4.0
[NVIRONMEtlIAL CONSINJMllfN The amendment relates to changes in recordkeeping, reporting, or administrative procedures or requirements. The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration, and there has been no puolic comment on such finding (51 FR 47138). Accordingly, the amendment meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(i.?(10).
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need he prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendment.
5.0
[DllC.Ly1LQll The Commission has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that:
(l? there is nasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) such activitie: will be can'iucted in compliance with the Con:nission's regulations, and (3) the istuance of the amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
Principal Contributor:
J. Zimmerman Date:
February 11, 1993 I
- - _ - _.