ML20128K021

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Transmits State Agreements Program Info SP-96-105 Re Draft LLRW Performance Assessment
ML20128K021
Person / Time
Issue date: 09/26/1996
From: Lohaus P
NRC OFFICE OF STATE PROGRAMS (OSP)
To:
GENERAL, MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH OF, OHIO, STATE OF, OKLAHOMA, STATE OF, PENNSYLVANIA, COMMONWEALTH OF
References
SP-96-105, NUDOCS 9610100263
Download: ML20128K021 (7)


Text

a 8 SEP 2 61996 ALL AGREEMENT STATES MASSACHUSETTS, OHIO, OKLAHOMA, PENNSYLVANIA TRANSMITTAL OF STATE AGREEMENTS PROGRAM INFORMATION (SP-96-105 )

Your attention is invited to the enclosed correspondence which contains:

INCIDENT AND EVENT INFORMATION.......

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT INFORMATION.......

TRAINING COURSE INFORMATION..........

TECHNICAL INFORMATION................XX DRAFT LLRW DISPOSAL BRANCH TECHNICAL POSITION OTHER INFORM ATION....................

Supplementary Information: Enclosed for your information is a copy of the slides on the draft Low Level Radioactive Waste Performance Assessment Branch Technical Position presented by Mr. Timothy McCartin, NMSS at the 1996 All Agreement States meeting.

POINT OF CONTACT: Lloyd Bolling TELEPHONE: (301) 415-2327 l FAX (301) 415-3502 l INTERNET LAB @NRC. GOV Original Signed By:

PAULH.LOHAUS Paul H. Lohaus, Deputy Director Office of State Programs

Enclosure:

As stated Distribution:

DlR RF RBangart DCD (SP03) FAXEO-TO-STATES. //

PLohaus PDR (YESf NO_,)

SDroggitis All A/S File RSAOs ) E-mailed

-AH-A/S-Mtg File RSLOs ) 9/27/96 DOCUMENT NAME: G:\SP96105 .LA[\f\fI A OFFICE ./A OSP lC d)#:fR C OSP:D[L /[C' NAME /78 d. Bolling:maj P6hh alis i RLBang6rt pATE " 09/2M96 9F'96 9tg]96 I ~

OSP FILE CODE: S P- A-4 gg h 9610100263 h 960926

_ (

PDR STPRG ESGGEN PDR

p rag g)1 UNITED STATES  !

< 3 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION E

E WASHINGTON. D.C. 2000&4001

'+,.....,o September 26, 1996 ALL AGREEMENT STATES MASSACHUSETTS, OHIO, OKLAHOMA, PENNSYLVANIA ,

i TRANSMITTAL OF STATE AGREEMENTS PROGRAM INFORMATION (SP-96-105 )

Your attention is invited to the enclosed correspondence which contains:

t INCIDENT AND EVENT INFORMATION.......

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT INFORMATION.......

TRAINING COURSE INFORMATION..........

TECHNICAL INFORMATION................XX DRAFT LLRW DISPOSAL '

BRANCH TECHNICAL POSITION OTHER INFORM ATION....................

Supplementary Information: Enclosed for your information is a copy of the slides on the draft ,

Low Level Radioactive Waste Performance Assessment Branch Technical Position presented '

by Mr. Timothy McCartin, NMSS at the 1996 All Agreement States meeting.

POINT OF CONTACT: Lloyd Bolling TELEPHONE: (301) 415-2327 FAX (301) 415-3502 INTERNET LA B@NRC. GOV 1

I

j. h &

a H. haus, Deputy Director Office of State Programs

Enclosure:

As stated i

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF LLW DISPOSAL.

l

[ 4, 5 E i

h,

~

Summary of Primary issues in Draft BTP i

)

1996 All Agreement States Meeting (September 19,1996) l t CONTACTS: Tim McCartin NMSS (415-6681)

Fred Ross NMSS (415-6705)

Mark Thaggard NMSS (415-6718) l

IE REGULATORY BASIS FOR LLW PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT l

  • Performance objectives established in 10 CFR 61.41, " Protection of the General Population from Releases of Radioactivity" j - releases must not result in an annual dose of 25 mrem whole body,75 mrem to the thyroid, and 25 mrem to any other organ l

l

  • Performance assessment (PA) defined as the technical analysis used to demonstrate l compliance with performance objectives 1

1

  • PA facilitates integrated evaluation of engineering design and site
  • Part 61 incorporated into Agreement State regulations 1

l J

NRC BRANCH TECHNICAL POSITION

  • Developed to provide guidance on PA not addressed in Standard Review Plan
  • Key issues in PA where further guidance is required include:

- An overall understanding of the performance assessment process j 1) PA is an integral part of site characterization program

2) Iterative process between site characterization and PA Modeling of key processes and their interactions including infiltration rates, source term releases, and engineered barrier degradation 1

Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses i

f 1

2

REGULATORY ISSUES IN LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE

~

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

  • Four policy issues were identified during development of BTP on PA and

! complementary effort on LLW Test Case 3

time of compliance or PA analyses i - considerations for future site conditions, processes, and events i

performance of engineered barriers treatment of sensitivity and uncericinty

  • COMMISSION APPROVED PUBLICATION OF DRAFT BTP FOR COMMENT i

k

' - 3

, . - . - . . . . . - . - - , - . . . . , ..,y.

CURRENT SCHEDULE i

Draft BTP out for public comment January 1997 Anticipate a 60-90 day comment period March 1997 Publish Final BTP August 1997 Publish Test Case NUREG October 1997 i

I 1

. 4 9

- , -, -m ,

a m, , , -- -- ., -, ..-.. -, . -..,.ms ,~ .,v,,,,. . -, - - , -.- ., - , v. . - . .--- ,-.- -. , -,-, ,, e- w v . . . .