ML20128J198
| ML20128J198 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 05/28/1985 |
| From: | Hukill H GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP. |
| To: | Stolz J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20128J203 | List: |
| References | |
| 5211-85-2089, NUDOCS 8505310041 | |
| Download: ML20128J198 (5) | |
Text
i I
CPU Nuclear Corporation Nuclear
- e=s:,v8o o
a Middletown. Pennsylvania 17057 0191 717 944 7621 May 28, 1985 TELEX 84 2386 Writer's Direct Dial Number:
5211-85-2089 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attn: John F. Stolz, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No. 4 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Washington, D.C. 20555
Dear Mr. Stolz:
Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit I, (TMI-1)
Operating License No. DPR-50 Docket No. 50-289 Technical Specification Change Request No. 144 Enclosed are three originals and forty conformed copics of Technical Specification Change Request No. 144.
Also enclosed is one signed copy of the Certificate of Service for this request to the chief executives of the township and county in which the facility is located, as well as the Bureau of Radiation Protection.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.91(a)(1), we enclose our analyses, using the standards in 10 CFR 50.92 of significant hazards considerations. As stated above, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.91(a) of the regulations, we have provided a copy of this letter, the proposed change in Technical Specifications, and our analyses of significant hazards considerations to Thomas Gerusky, the designated representative of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 170.21, enclosed is a check for $150.00 as payment of the fee associated with Technical Specification Change Request No. 144.
Sincerely, F. D. Hu ill Director, THI-1 HDH/JGB/spb
Enclosures:
- 1) Technical Specification Change Pequest No. 144 1
- 2) Certificate of Service for Technical Specification Change g
Request No. 144 gP 3fO
- 3) Check No. 00173178 8505310041 850528 DR ADOCK 05000289 I
cc:
J. Thoma p
0 ylp 0 PDR GPU Nuclear Corporation is a subsidiary os me w......
slic Utilities Corporation ip B"d tMj M13)IJ
UNITED STATES'0F AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION-l IN THE. MATTER OF DOCKET NO. 50-289 LICENSE NO. DPR-50 GPU NUCLEAR CORPORATION This is'to certify that a copy of Technical Specification Change Request No.144 to Appendix A of the Operating License for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Unit 1,1has, on the date given below, been filed with executives of Londonderry Township, Dauphin County, Pennsylvania; Dauphin County, Pennsylvania; and the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources, Bureau of Radiation Protection, by deposit in the United States mail,
' addressed as follows:-
Mr. Jay H. Kopp, Chairman Mr. John E. Minnich, Chainnan Board of Supervisors of Board of County Commissioners Londonderry Township of Dauphin County.
R. D. #1, Geyers Church Road Dauphin County Courthouse Middletown, PA -17057 Harrisburg, PA 17120 Mr. Thomas Gerusky, Director PA. Dept. of Environmental Resources Bureau of Radiation Prctection P.O. Box 2063 Harrisburg, PA 17120 GPU NUCLEAR CORPORATION BY Ni rectof,' TMI-1 DATE: May 28, 1985 i
c; METh0POLITAN EDIS0N COMPANY JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
~
AND PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY THREE MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1 Operating License No. DPR-50 Docket No. 50-289 Technical Specification Change Request No. 144 This Technical Specification Change Request is submitted in support of
~ Licensee's request to change Appendix A to Operating License No. DPR-50 for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1.
As a part of this request, proposed replacement pages for Appendix A are also included.
GPU NUCLEAR CORPORATION BY Director, TMI-1 Sworn and Subscribed to before me this 2m
- u. s
, 1985.
day of
& Ak1 A Jt AN BIPRY. 801 ARY PUcitC v1DDLt1%N FORG. DAUPHIN C00dfV '
My COMMISSION f XPIRf5 JUNE 17.1965 Member. Pemy;va1.s Auctution of Notanet 1
1 i
~.
.'1',0 a
I; TechnicEl Specification ' Change Request-No.144 The. Licensee. requests that the revised Figure 6-2 replace _the existing Figure 6-2 in the TMI-1 Technical Specifications.
i II.
Reason for Change-
'This TSCR is requested due.to;a change in the Plant Engineering Department to improve the. organizational structure. :The change shows the addition of " Manager (s), Plant Engineering" positions reporting to the Plant Engineering Director. Current plans are for two such positions, with several of the Lead Engineers reporting to one of the two Managers.
The " Chemistry Supervisor" block. title has been changed to " Staff Chemist" to reflect the current title for this position. The Lead Nuclear Engineer and the Staff Chemist continue to report directly to the Plant Engineering Director, i
III. -Safety Evaluation Justifying Change The changes are administrative changes to assure better management of the1 engineering workload. The Plant Engineering Organization maintains the same number of disciplines, experience, and educational requirements.
~This change therefore, does not reduce the margin of safety provided by' the Technical Specifications.
IV.
No Significant Hazards Consideration j
These proposed changes are similar to Example 11 of the " Amendments Not Likely to Involve Significant Hazards Considerations" from Federal Register Vol. 48, No.- 67 at 14870 on April 6, 1983.
1 The proposed Amendment, which is similar to the suggested format in the Standard Technical Specifications, does not affect plant design or i
operation. and does not involve modifications to plant equipment or changes'that would affect plant safety analyses. The organization change assures that an adequate number of disciplines with sufficient education and experience are available to provide the on-site engineering support necessary to TMI-1 operations.
This TSCR constitutes additional management control through an improved organizational structure of the Plant Engineering Department.
t Therefore, the proposed amendment involves no significant hazards
_ considerations in that it does not i
i i
P i.
~
- 1) Invol've a significant increase in the probability or consequences
~
of an accident previously evaluated.
- 2) Create the pos'sibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated.
- 3) Involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.
V.
Implementation It is requested that the Amendment authorizing this change become effective upon_ issuance.
(
{
l I
l i