Text

Forwards Viewgraphs for Commission 840731 Briefing Re Status Rept on Full Power Amend
	ML20128H432
Person / Time
Site:	Grand Gulf
Issue date:	07/27/1984
From:	Houston D; NRC
To:	Verrelli D; NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML20128H415	List: IA-84-658, Notes That Util Aware of Tech Spec Errors as of 820816. Errors Documented in Plant Quality Deficiency Repts; ML20128H410; ML20128H432; ML20128H460; ML20128H472; ML20128H496; ML20128H508;
References
	FOIA-84-658 NUDOCS 8505300515
	Download: ML20128H432 (167)
	v • d • e

6 stad EESS t U A. NVUL t Aia~fii CUL ATOM Y'dOhhi1 Fit 0*d~~ i-EQUESTER'8 MAILING ADD".tS$

fm,2.n, ,, ; ...mT 1 C

i CLT 4 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL !avAs&

REQUEST h DATE V 4 [, C.

RETUM gMfgNALTQ

wha NO 6

MESSAGE TO l h". nee AND oNG AMIRATigy FAC5184f LE FMoME MuMe ER Wemirscarsom Pseuma nuassEM CfYv W/ -

Nl $ '

2 $*

TATE AUTOMATIC nusauth,0* r_ pas

(, ...a.m a l _ , ,,

= YE8 ' ' "

1 MESSAGE FROM ~

~

9t AM E ~~ l vs a.m, MON E Me* FACSfMILE PHONE NUp4pCR vgngrgcArgow Tys,apMnest numuEW DAuk ween.opa so tue to a men.) Low.spr u rs f. . ., .)

cusocihs ,

M3rf gM A86 870* Avvouavec a u rum a vec 'i f

~ '

.. I5 . _ A ; .-

F V PRECEDENCE

{ roun nouns l l Two 6io'uns l [untwoun ~ M emususaTE

[ svesinseur {'. '

SPE CLAL IMsTP WST 90No q/8 t ,

f3 "f -

ff.0^

YsM6/pAf E /Stanw,)

. ^

! m Ec Elv en ,

~T EAmsMsTTEfs e i pdo M . .

S ', ' . . .

4pyznuae<.:......-

' 8

,. 8505300515 841102 PDR FOIA DELL 84-658 PDR I

t . ,

.,1

/ . - .

.~ . .

COMMISSION ~ BRIEFING GRAND GULF, UNIT 1 t

STATUS REPORT CONSIDERATION OF FULL a -

' POWER AMENDMENT J. . . . .. . . , ,

JULY 31, 1984 i

i s

$ I a .

6 ..

BP.iEFING OUTLINE LICENSEE / PLANT BACKGROUND >

MAJOR ACTIVITIES SINCE LOW POWER LICENSE (Com #pc)

LICENSE ACTIVITIES PLANT ACTIVITIES COMMISSI'ON BRIEFINGS . . . . .

PLANT MODIFICATIONS EXPERIENCE REPORT REGION II. [ Cover #pe)

LICENSED OPERATOR RECERTIFICATION OPERATING STAFF EXPERIENCE NON-LICENSED PERSONNEL TRAINING ASSESSMENT OF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE (MINI-SALP)

PLANT MANAGEMENT CHANGES SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURES SELECTED REVIEW ISSUES [C=+er /p> e)

TD.I DIESEL GENERATOR TE'CHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS OPERATING EXPERIENCE -

GDC-17 EXEMPTION FOR LOW POWER ALLEGATIONS .

CONCLUSIONS .

fac&s :

I t .

r i

..=..

t I

LICENSEE / PLANT BACKGROUNQ ,

4

. . t LICENSEES:

MIS $1SSIPPIPOWER&LIGHTC05PA'NY(OPERATOR) -

MIDDL,E SOUTH ENERGY, INC, SOUTH MISSISSIPPI ELECTRIC POWER ASSOCIATION .

PLANT: -

LOCATION: PORT GIBSON, M1SS.1SSIPPI 4-TYPE / VENDOR:' BWR/GE . .i t

AE/ CONSTRUCTOR: BECHTEL .

t POWER-LEVEL:, . 1250 MWE

. .t.

i NO OL HEARING -

,, 1.0'd POWERTICF.NSt.1S$U't.u: b/lb/sz ;

'FIRST U.S', BWR/6 MARK 111 -:

.i; o -;

o, 1 .

y

~.

. 8

. f i4 t'

j ;

, . +

,' .*;. /*

s 1 ,

.,,tv 6 t _

LICENSINQ,.AG.T_lyITIES FOR GRAND GULF SINCE OL ISSUANCE 1 AMENDMENTS TO THE LICENSE - NOS, 1 THRU 12 g ..

SYSTEM TIC APPRAISAL.S OF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE (SALP) -

2/10/83 AND 1/19/84 2.206[PETITIONFILEDBYJULEP-3/29/84 ORDERS: . !.

I TECH SPEC CHANGES FOR RESTRICTED OPERATION (4/18/84) t i

TEARDOWN INSPECTION OF TDI DIESEL (5/22/84) .!

EXEMPTION REQUESTS: t e

10 CFR 50.71 FSAR UPDATE-(2/6/84) ,

- GDC-152AND17(6/4/84,7/19/84) '

t II 7

/ ,

l .,

7l t'(

1 . ;: '

'4

. P

s. [' ,

(.

r

. I PL Afs'T AC TIVITIES FOR GRMD GUI.F SINCE 01. ISSUANCE i -

1.-

JULY 1,I1982 COMENCED FUEL LOADING j

')

AUGUST 8, 1982 COMPLETED FUEL LOADING S g

AUGUST 18 1982 INITIAL CRITICALITY .

SEPTEMBER 16, 1982 NON-NUCLEAR HEATUP TESTING COMMENCED -

OCTOBER 25, 1982 STARTED MAINTENANCE OUTAGE

{

- DRYWFLL COOLING SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS l SEPTEMBER 25, 1983 RECRITICALITY AND COMMENCED LOW POWER j TESTING -

?

1

. NOVEMBER;8, 1983 COMPLETED LOW POWER TESTING . , 4 Lj APRIL 22, 1984 MAY 2, 198.4 LOW POWER OPERATION RESUMED

[. 3

- PLANT SHUTDOWN - RHR PIPE PROBLEMS &

MAY 6, 1984 . PLANT RESTART 'j '

1 J

MAY 8, 1l984 PLANT SHUTDOWN - RHR PROBLEM RECURRENCE y, 1

< ,- . .c a

^

! MAY11,!1984 PL ANT RESTART'

]

I -

JUNE 1,I1984 PLANT SilVTDOWN BY' MP&L PENDING RESOLUTION ,' i p, . . ,

. OF STANDBY SERVICE WATER SYSTEM DESIGN

~

i

.l

g. r c

l

lt .

u 2'

h I ',

, 'i r

I l 'j+ * ,

y ,'>

5

. F. 1

,i' '. i t -

I~ .

wrzusa ern ae m.ce2 eet --

., ASSESSMENT OF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE MIN!-SALP EVALUATION OF JANUARY 1984 CATEGORY 3 ITEMS

PLANT OPERATIONS SIGNIFICANT ACTIONS HAVE TAKEN PLACE COMPLETION OF 0PERATOR RECERTIFICATION PROGRAM

. TRAINING OF SHIFT ADVISORS

^

PLANT MANAGEMENT CHANGES INSUFFICIENT OPERATION TO EVALUATE 4 ..

.. MAI.NTENANCE -

s .

INCREASED ACTIONS TO IDENTIFY MAINTENANCE DEFICIENCIES c .:: -

[

SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURES

.: . ;~. -SIGNIFJCANT IMPROVEMENTS .

16. QUALITY ASSURANCE

~

. PROGRAM BETTER THAN AVERAGE BUT IMPLEMENTATION NOT

. .. EFFEC 7IVE.

1 g .

, LICENS.ING'ACTIVITJES 0 j' h EFFORTS ON TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION'AND TDI DIESEL p REVIEW SHOW. IMPROVED MANAGEMENT ATTENTION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE a . c.:;; .

,' - J ,.

d . .

N

\

r e **4 I

f -

at

.=

t t

i fj0N-LICENSED PERSONNEL TRAINING f

D

' f,.I.

Tw MP&L PRESENTATION TO REGION'JI ON 4

JANUAI)Y30,198f1 . . .

r ?f

M,, -

REGION !!~ IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES IN

-26 '

TRAINING PROGRAM -

b +L*:-

E g. ,

bk.

x ,.

MP&L H :S. MAD,E PERSONNEL CHANGES AND P91 - IS REVIEWINGi PROGRAM

~

sh :

s %

?Y F

REGION II IIAS ASKED 01 T0. INVESTIGATE

=

lk...

1

., s.

I I,. $# 'E' / ,a,g 4 6 .*g 1,%

l ' } I

- *h -g

,* ?j4

,g . ,

w,{.{

v. .

'l [h .

, f; , ,i/I

> p -:h,

~ a

ts . .

,. 1 ' *

, g .3 ; * ' ,

c r'

', , '; , .1 ,

f ^,*

+

^

-t . *

. .' e,~ ~

y#

.,3-

_ l(' .. +

n ,

4

-f {- .

..w ,

b, I

. , e *_ ,

e

'y y, f i

'3

I

. m,

- i

' e7mm e7:se

m. cea au 1

l i

ev . .

p.

^t 4f'., . . . .

COMMISSION BRIEFINGS FOR

.v. .

T GRAND GULF SINCE OL ISSUANCE

'i

, :n -

%_q) ..

- w.c R . DECEMBER 8, 1983 GRAND GULF STATUS REPORT' ,

1 4

u.n;y ,

~'9 6 *. FEBRUARY 29, 1984 GRAND GULF STATUS REPORT !

, )

^?gt M. - ,,

., . a .

A r;.q

'? t.

c + /O ' MARCH 20, 1984 - -

GRAND GULF TECHNICAL SP.ECIFICATION

^ ,3 *

.. 4

'& y REQUIREMENTS - !

M ,

DIESEL ENGINE INSPECTION ORDER OF

,'s.CS?'

n , MAY 24, 1984 .

'1 idig:~ g- - *

MAY 22, 1984 1 e w as . -

s' i

.w...%. ,

i py,g,'. a..

JUNE 1, 1984 s' DIESEL E'NGINE INSPECTION ORDER OF j_

e. :2 F. MAY 22, 1984

. :g .

i

; 4.x; 3 ,*

.?

yw

,, J.. . . ,

[ f Q , .

-@N? . .- ,

0 fl

( ,.g 3hQ. p .* '

J

, . c i , %.

r i, vs, % ,

'* d L*,- QA -

6 q@I -;

d

@@ d f?.p, , .,y

[ ,+

+

N

.w p ,

,3 y? ' " *ll.. { 's. ,

, J u

~

y' . , -

' ?_ K,[,% k* ,

.i y? -;f \.;y-g7.T .. , +

, i

,e p

. n ,. . . .

cytt:y+7l * ;\ -

j' 7 d,. ;.-

,'l Q+

u, fr ,

p. ,,'[ y : o,'

. . o-

[ }

1, g-

s. .

ffiy;. ..

p 9,7 4., .

R2,

.p m .

/m

-pa g5g . : .

'. ' B7/27/84 07:49 NO.003 00S -

-r .

A MAJOR PLANT MODIEICATIONS

{-

SINCE 0L ISSUAN_E C

.ff .t)@lEICATIONS_0.CTOBER 1982 TO JUNE 1983 i-

DRYWELL C00' LING SYSTEM MODIO.GATIONS i

I'*

r.D k REACT ,,

0R PROTECTION SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS

${[

PL. ANT SERVICE WATER SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS s

.t ISOLATION VALVE STATUS' BOARD INSTALLATION

w '

, ADDITION TO PLANT AIR SYSTEM .

. . .,-{oj S.0 LID RADWASTE SYSTEM MODIFICATION s MODIFICATIONS JUNE 1983 TO PRESENT ,

.. . REPLACEMENT OF AGASTAT RELAYS

1. N[i-

GAS TURBINE GENERATORS INSTALLED (INTERIM MEASURE) h;t:

STANDBY SERV' ICE WATER BASIN MODIFICATION o .. % g PIPE SUPPORT MODIFICATIONS DOE TO S0ll STRUCTURE INTERACTION

( .3 .

ANALYSIS c:g y .

. . c . y. .

! .i .. ,

'f:

.e

, e

7 $.y .

,q: .

x

7 ,

W, -

l: N '

r . 'i: -

- +

.m .

I r s

r .

. . .p . . > ~ . .

L

' ews eme-m.ces oca f 1 t 'j,*,,

. ~ g'* -

l'Me: - - LICENSED OPERATOR RECERTIFICATION PROGRAM-y a .

-@ .s vitj

Nj, ~

. - SEPTEMBER 1982 TO REGION II INSPECTION FINDINGS 1

I

".%.r *kN.

NOVEMBER 1983 REQUIBING RECERTIFICATION PROGRAM n},*

~

E M: NOV. EMBER 1933 TO PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHED BY MPal 6 @>k

~

MARCH 1984 ,. ..'

. 4 f y' 5. l -

g

. := . .. w ....

.a . 4 epi .

3s :.n1. B:

' ,4!E

PROGBAN REVIEWED BY ARKANSAS POWER AND LIGHT, DUKE POWER AND .

^' 5 7 GENERAL ELECTRIC

.. w pg: .

,a ,'w:g n - ,

r p . J::,p . * -

ALL LICENSED OPERATORS (SRO a RO) RECERTIFIED .

~

-e '

wqg.: > 49 3

7j

' ~

-, s .]{'j **,-

'A SIMULATOR AND ORAL EXAMINAION OF ALL OPERATORS BY REGION 11 e .'

16. .*

n w$! -* .

J

r. V s CURRENTLY 27 RECE8TIFIED LICENSED OPERATORS (15 SRO, 12 RO)

'il a b .

> c6 a: 4

.E i,

SUFF.lCIENT FOR F'lVE SHIFT dPERATION .

q .

s -

.m ,

an .- n (nT ;u:9 i,8 ~

,* NRC HAS VERIFIED ADEQUATE KNOWLEDGE OF All LICENSED.0PERATORS.~ t a

,. 'm

&V. .

.^, .. . , . il . ;i 4.M 4 (_ 4 - p q , y' e .

3 ""

sj , <

vjQ:g;!.} ;

l~;4l; ..y',;

, nssc .; .. , - a r

-;t j^ h.f jl , e ' *j 3yy ^r &

, . y jr F J

(

2 4

1

' 1 1 I,fwf* l:. ,* ~ . ' . 3, *

' *a l! 'h1 + , ,

2 , , !- ,

li . e Wl k*,1Q

. u

l.- . .

1 F . .

CBMPARISON OF GRAND GULFJECHNICAL SPEC _IFICATIONS, E.SAR, AND AS-BUILT PLANT .

s - .

~

a ~ SUBJECT .

~

~ '

~ IDENTIFIED

_. BY MPal DISC REPANCIES NOTED IN COMPARIS0N OF 73 i

,' .TS.VS, FSAR l --

DISC REPANCIES NOTED IN COMPARISON OF 70 I TS VS, AS-BUILT PLANT

,- .9. '

. , ;~. .-c- >:l s;

DISC '

8' ' '

(EPANCIES.N0TED I.N COMPARISON'0F ,

=

FSAR.,VS. AS-BUILT, PLANT -

' 4 yr :-- . s' rt e o .; y . s - .

.s

t .I e

'% 9, a

4 4

4 j 'N

. s

.: . 3 ,.

.t .

B

- s 3

5' 1,Lt ,

f,r , Q V: il4? y ~M h: 57f , C% "U *i " '

_. l

i .

_ GRAND GUtF TECilRICAL SPECIFICATIONS 1(0NrR.EfRESENTATIVE PLANT ITEMS 1

REQUI RED IN TS, NOT SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED IN FSAR, NOT -

ACTllALLY IN PLANT .

EXPLOSIVE VALVES IN THE TIP SYSTEM .

-;rEMPORARY RADWASTE HOLDUP TANKS .

0FFSITE u- AC POWER CIRCUIT AUTOMATIC TRANSFER FEATURE c

- 1

/0LTAGE INSTRUMENTATION ON MCC PANELS .

< i;~.

i p

REQUI RED IN TS, CONSISTENT WITH FSAR, FSAR INCORRECTLY

,T c DESI:RIBED' ACTUAL PLANT .

v. s

,A1 FUEL GRAPPLE INTERLOCK '

j.'

1.0AD SHEDDING AND SEQUENCER AUTOMATIC FUNCTION g,

. ,. / .

' Ps LOW CONDENSER VACUUM BYPASS i

' yi . -. tw*

Mr ACCURATELY DESCRIBED IN FSAR, INCORRECTLY-D'ESCRIBED IN TS 3 y -

.ee J

IfYDROGEN RECOMBINER PENETRATIONS g;

USR

. '. T :

C ]. ,ilRYWELL HYDROGEN RECOMBINER . . .

T.y'!'

REQUI ED IN TS, NOT SPECIFICALI,Y DESCRIBED IN FSAR, TS

/Ef

.w INC RRECT WITH RESPECT TO ACTUAL PLANT" thM

. + .

r

. FUEL TUBE TRANSFER SYSTEM .

1l, x;

-l REQUESTED BY MPal AS TS CHANGE, NOT ACTUALLY IN PLANT

. . w,Vi u -

'~

1 EVER ARM ON VACUUM BREAKERS-Jo.;;., ,

N

,, *Ro ,

[ .( .{bh::k T f_ r % ';:D i-j;

,, <, ^r y- li ij

. ~1 .

.'8 YQ:.I p: a l; ,

Bec/up ~ : dg;9;h 3

t e,

a }. : ;. cm at

. . . . .y .

1 .j.

L P i I

L i :

9 L

I e i i '

h, l r

F CONCLUSIONS P

V LICErlSEE.HASFULFILLNDALLCONDITIONSINLOWPOWERLICENSE i

THAT RESTRICTED OPERATION IN EXCESS OF 5% POWER ,

PLANiISREADYFORFULLPOWERAMENDHENTONCOMPLETIONOF

., C0FDITIONS IDENTIFIED IN THE TDI EVALUATION ll

5 .

fi . !

pvN.,-

- + . , ("'

4 .

i *

, 't -

s s

'O v ?

[ O

? \

u?

j> ,

I

" ~3

.$ . y w-u[ .

~!$!f

~

s J,

-; i

.% 71 f1 y ,

~

,i <

$y{r1{

.+ -

~

t gf'g f ." '3)

.+

o :

.s ~ +es " i.mgr s , p. ro

. * ~~

D *

e 9 g e

-k .Y e

e w

a y' *? ,, -

., .g "e," , . ka . .y hk a /p.4

, A >' -

he#,

f E

a E h *.g '

,J k --g ^

j f

,' r -

y =, g%. ' %.

c '; ;, eg',n g i 1-9.,

y -

4% 4

4 ) 1 -

- s , : .

c

.' W

a I

s c

,4 , s,?.. .

w j ' h t,,,,',,

,>,st- ; *,

3, , c. %.

e

j. e ' 3 j - (,. f 4 y$ h' .

.s v-p.'I"

^

' , s .

j L k 'd'4, I 4 2,si g

. ' , . , -'* s ,,' , p/:

.'t"3,- q ,

g,g.,-

3 .

.. - r, .4 4e,',,,- 4

,* io r (s (b ' . , .-

e .- .+.e , --

+

"rj.

4

, -A>A',

3

,4 f $._a..,6 4

9 (1 # e

4. -', . l 2 .4 ^y mA p9 p

? 9

< 4F4 - -

w,}5% W rJ

- % b .

5 p

{ .3 . :, , e r s y>- 4 '= i

,o A e 4 7 [ht g r

s. 7

, +,v,,r e'

s -3 s

, e*.',. .

4 9

g.

.Y >

4

.. ,f..

y p - x Is

.$h , t ' W ,%- -'# h

, - * $~v- e .4- s < .

. 1 , 4-). f ,.3.,hs, ; s.

,j,,t ^ , -

, 4 s I,'*-

y y .

'WOt I

. * ,.s. I$ ~

v : 1 ;7a

. ;r(

- t .s. ,,

v. .

- 3...'y y

. %A9 '. , .,~" . v- ,, , -

- 4

%. .%n.

3

' ' {' . - . + g

b 4 #

, p*~ .- ,, T

?"

><v

- , e .g ; cs g y..

gl.;,g 9q

..q,- .n

-y -

[- ~m ,,, . , sjf,J*y

+ - r3 {. .

f , -

s . #

7 y-- fyf ~

,_,q~ .

'.,. p' W .J 8'-

w

.[ e s . k, . . ,

g.* *

h , -

, e , *

.: Jq s -,,

', "

i . := D -

~

, *' * (; +-

3 r p3 ei

,e -. . 'h. m%(3. .. *)... .;h;l s i s'[

s.

},j*a$f. ,

, i*

G h$n [ , R;.a c M O-L Up.

'v ;, y ,.,.t,,.m m

. - w s

& ?~

n. .wk*

r

Ew nA. - t

,_> v f -

> ,Q ~ -

o 5 dv r # /Q Ti e

IN . k *,ui?-{9,'

-WT . n; -

% r ' W~ ,?,' %

c. a.

p fe

' *V -'> a. u- 1 v _ e 3. a e - t , Q., . L* Y , . j,

+ p , t s. '*:<

i

,r 4'ht - .v

.-ws2y + . .. +

e w ; &)3S J , , * ,- , . + -,- 5 f, , , .. + %.

e g

g.s ~

4 y .. M 3( ,3 v d 1p;7 . , ]'M Y U- N ((f. .

~

O'

~ h. m. ,.[h ; ; ,

1

, s. -

- . pn s.

.h.s[.,$+.

Q .r . . ey .

.m u.

%., . h.d 3 t ,

.p-y

,. < J e ,.

e

. n..,. u 1st.y 2

s W ,.A. g4 #x ,.-+d,. y .

L y< ,

4 y . q T* Y .. .

-9 ' *

, 7'- .,, p,,a.

g %,' ',' q t

.'9 y f a,,

u "> - , ,. .w- -- n. .L, -

t

,o .

f' { .. .., n' ,;s ", s.c -

,A- p . , s. -l;4,* ",e,]t" -

,i n & -4'*\ . r '^8' f #

,4' 1 - -

t 4 T,. -W \

, ~

,y',v, re's4 ')

fi) > h

y ns[ f[.f-

> . > =. ;r i - p

4 )

L.( ,<%

q.,gy ..T j d. v>Y ip; M+. *b c

^

,g<, * '

t,.s , ;. , ,", J ~ ~ ,c

,m<+.,+ . , -

s.

- v .

~+

, 3 g g. .. .#

3 .. ., . > .,- .

r,

., t c *o5 . .,n. . ** d' '

An ' +. E ,;? #

T .J,> 4 NM #P2. w

.s

.s., n 5 i ,.

s . L ';3 s.'g

ff WM - 9%: ., 2 c .

y9 ss

-g Q.: i.; ; %y dyMQ, .~ -' #,'4$M,co -+ ,.

mWG;,.r,U?

f 4p &. M ' f,

.m

((:%fd4 g,p&

p- KY y.1iq.4 My W$U u@M i,;(UY.7

.S jNW.'M V Q W% ,J l 4 7 h H.:

ML>

dwm . '3;.y m o.?n .- j,,,QW~.[Tf{$@@&Q

+ w M m t . . m: n% : W%& h n,w y}{+%%g @ W Q g{&.y w ;R ~j f % * :y x- 7-W Q ttG+ @}

ewy& -q, , v, yn.g'., -

s e

a *4 ; y8

p , n , m,g&,. g s x.

.e .v n ; ; y , t.g ;. . . a q s ., ,- ,

- .w y g s ws . . f p i a g scw. g y ,' vA7r c s an. 4 ,.4 4 ci m% . * +3 %

W pm@+ g% . -O, wpw t

n 3+w ( ,..s,

.<.r .~ .e % 3 / e. , -

j e ;py_ A .,..t %

~

. ~g ,m,,y .:,, ..s

.,o'/p. p

,4

+. . ~r c .w D.@. . 7 [;, 9 k .Z.$m a n. ps. Y M.M' 1.. y 3 p %y m.t ,

Vd@k.

, .kzm[TM.W. . .f. !.7 d_%. M*s % m II,.U.$ $ . MMMUi.R

G:

.c

,. . v.h gi 4.4,.y - .)..

6, m

,, 4 6 , z' y gQ " < 7 s,.

' 4 . *+

,g s~

[ , 4 'E <

jh.m n. E,Q v.y r x o' ' ;

r

, ,. . ll}. AW& k'

. o%b'*4 - u*Y' w.f. h,4 Yy" Y ~ ! , (, Y*g-

.- ,s ' M -5 {g. .w gs - ?.~. h" m .' ), ,.e N ,,

. - 'u~ i l QN'- N .-

E eh~Y,

,.'s)-w;7.% f4g,ew. 5"Ns*y . [ n**e*"F'Q{kl

)N [j,5[ E_.

E. [ 1,'f. u. I tQ. , .O - .,*h d

GY((ge

w. a.y ., smg . w-- m wa n, M ' m... .*

4

- 3 .u n n ,. .,

. - a.. -( m. _ . k. ,a.h..

rc ~

+.

6e 4 .

-M O

'9 F

-v. ..e,

, 'w e * ,h $ ' . , g Ah M

S, I e,

. k. . ..m* r& * , .

+ -+w+ s . g . . sr : p. *s *. ~e

.s : s e;.

3 .

c

' S 4,~ A%; or Qe* v ~wpM,

,H

$y, MMJ MX g / '. ~ ; , v,". H=a, j; <[ wi s* '

L ;pq py *(ijd sa wi .. Qg%.s p - y 4-7.ie d .;n

=

a. At

.n,, ;- e- - -

.y *

4,,, % .ws*g< . nM.,. rp 4c;:r. n c. a ~p m s. g ~q; c > , + a ; s %, i 2,2.

'e '

, < . er ,;

, w n m . ~ . <,-, ,g.. ,,

q_ , -

x ts - r, -e e. s

,, : .r.-

g r 3i s ~, <

6 os. Ss b;a n.. . i. 5 gl,me, .s' 7'ijt-y

, e. .. m s4 ..> , .' ' " , , , , Q ,. .. + . :tuy43

% - e e-

, 1 '{ zm- y.. . , . ,

'y *

, g .

>4 4 A --

..f,, nx .7. + .U.k) [ 9 y ^ b e {j f 'e b

[ .]k .; Q - , "i %

p , . ;p ~ ,h . e.g dff ~ ~ .w o ,,

flk S. =,, f . ,~

w w r+ , , ,, ,.< .aw:e-qp ap ,' . . .

Q . . {d-.ww .lr lQlf

+ ..

Qwm , .f. ,vn:n-; 4, fjh a .

n. }. . ,, { f&. .p?

wn.p.

<pr ,

9*.. .

< a,

.s.. -e34, vx g _~.e,, + u.1 r s, N.a;-e<4 +

e, a a. %gN e k i

r n *

'#- %4 O . . .y" 'w !s i,'4 ma ik. Z d q s .

N .M, w.'M- A d, Q W ? [ ~ , .' fit ~., ,[lN,g IL.Sm.s...q w

-1 V3 s.?,w y; nn.n,/ v my ,m" !.9 e :[y,m%.~ n a m; .-sn' m.M,, n' M'N .'Y-$$."y[dLV ,mpwoO ga n. A m &.f;

?

Wmypw 4..

_ .W m

%.4 e g/.c% y?* s %wa; m: ,4-

? Q.2m n, - ', s . - g fw~g ,q3

~. 7.%m u w.t m r y. awh, A M',w@n+4;d, m '#ww.t mm. ;w,. ;

, onwnn&m w:w:e> z+V m ,;t h: ., %?M ,. .a.,%

v

%,9, ; n.- : / - /w p s V s n.,trx* %;% -q yp. ' 3w. qWA f 3. .u 4

. av , ; n yc y ee4~,-

a? , w m a. $ - w d Y wnY ame ?s . - -

;_._'.y j &. ^n? N $g.

k'Nk Q&y Q' ,' Wum% , b&n pl 9' Mtw%w ~.Q jf'% usVgww$ Qy y[(n?}d_$w&,L f Ni m?...j

. w

?.Q^.&w.

w :.y e. % e.y:,vwM..

lw)-Y ,

l56 ?w?&~

~@~ ,

o hr o g( , . [

aes %

b mu m vmw#rwk :

!m. m . - ~ m. m w x

? -

hb -tm h,r#pt '. fhb _k N _a 'w%

s m,.a':y m..s,

,-@.. . o ~.,

J s . .~. s, y e...-

yg 27fs.e,q ~.

7i n . v -

. - upm Pi sa;, . ,

c.;;j..,ff.' m; 2,m ;.p- v.h 6 --

sas** @'q,. .f,gm, g

K :t* {<n/y - w,$, 3 Pav r2,, . ( ,f 4 # .$ 7QLy .F- :- tj*s.* % f 4, v .

_m, 4 ? M. . m. ,4 , j.. e G. - yL ,c >*

.,..g.' L' .;g t .. . . - .

+ -: -es s ? % 13 2

_ ;, rur-~ g, g,

$ 3 $ ' Mi > 4' -tP FQC g,, .=,-

y _

y;, @y-C. ; t Q. ; # t,rQ* c ( Np '9- ,g,

.

1 M Hy M*.3.t 4+ <

fQ> . L s vg - ...S, , .. r s .;

. A5 $',.ay{7 5: s,

.W Y m;w , l W Y.,' m. c ., & ?m -kf?hf- <nsv. -, . r-- .#nys4Ch'

T ! O ' ~~;

l. g .-

x . <ig ~-. ,s 1,~m l lI

.m. s ' - l p- - . h a.,

. 4 ,

.g p.11,. . ,m.'.

n .s, p,a,m e g. . m r 4 m e. ~ ,

m t# .A b

.r ,.

';cy97-* 32

~,.r r q%.m , . . , y ,

- - 3. c> *a . -..x ; y, #w gv. , -

m s

_:=-a -J '.

a* , , mu. 3't 9, m

e.4 .o , o m, k ,-['. Yp ;..f r we Ii N No . k s .-

Q-f _ ,% , : i;a . l]y.g '_-(DMO : yf'

? ', T.j ~ N ,+ 4? &. b, +

% . yj-f }Ght&'s-

, u

. - Q Q@g,f, Q fa .l$g*?,j~.l.[,f'jjy ' M!? QWxT'v.g4j'.Y '*rf% %.'M%d),* N $'ll,._

G F d. f ~,

QWG %-W

, r;{ ffMfpijf ~~ m f@&*Y lg.-A%'*.

- $ $'.W Q , t yqzq ?, ) ^?'

v &y 19 i fj-yn

2)

Q M Q:q H &,,m6.s.am.aan

.in....._.-&ahm,

. h ...'

Qg h QM'Q,}-Q Q w.d Q b W ". , %Ms%.QT. '-f.n a.ghy?nQ{*} , L

w > %M. }W .

m %

- fiQG:,J7,,EX,EMPTION I 3- FOR LOW POWER i I

.. . .c

.f *

u.

~

MAY 18, 1984 - MPal. INFORMED OF NEED FOR EXEMPTION "

4.

REQUEST. ADDRESSING SHOREHAM FINDING < f

.:.n.

,. m JUNE 4, 1384 MP&L FILES EXEMPTION REQUEST 4:S a m.4 1-m sy JUNE 22, 1984 STAFF REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ; 7

' ~

i U.

TO CONCl,UDE "AS SAFE AS" .

M C,w 1.,.

4 ,

s w, ;--..

.'d Q i '

i * ' ADDRESS OTHER GDC -

JULY.19, l984 MP&L. RESPONDS TO RAl Mj:,

CHANGE IN EXIGENCY

L , .

L;.fei-D

+

AP ADDS REQUEST FOR GDC-f AND 2 $.x.,

,q r o

, ;mc4 e J pp;g7 '

a

_4 ,

n L, * '

Y~7_e ;/t s

l- ) ,

~

' ' -~- E '. ~ Ll . a, ,, k

, - y,3y y

$'t- *

_

s

',.,7 . . ., g . 9. .

'4 4.

g ce, fi

. l l \

g 4 v:

oa-h

+ g . . ,

t, *w; ,s* i

t. g s N p . ) g_i 4

( , .

, + fy3 ','Y'?, *

>~m *. $7

,: "? ) L a

, . ., s v

( , *'

e -e

1. r l- % =

,* s 'v. t.

t * * ,

- );4;s f j , , ' ^

NJ , . , e

, M (s 3

, l fry ', u

, . :g i - $ , ,

e ',

t J %!.f"; d '

p, f.:,.< .. , . ,

_ 1 c.c. .

. ; ', ; g.1.

3,,

.J . .To . ,, v . r,., ,

m . p,,.:gt,

'4.

'} ,

Ay

V._

i 4

Yt' , _, y , " ' I,

,+;.

'k e ; ly i . -

+ 4

~, . $:f: n..

tA j4 ?;

>e e

,.-(; '

' dl.4 + -

l4 5

, t.' /

"Y"

'n A( d* W '

':}, -

s5 .

rg ,

' . ,' 'J'y if'

. -; ,t-a. , . < 6.g g l( ,' *1 '

,'1,;#j .; s .' e - ' ;~> 18$7?)

.. . + , .

, ;A .n

1. k. Y[

+,.m .h e'g l

,f

't

-+ / R

' .u / g (3 3.o g_ .7~,>;,-. - ,

me ,

. . 4. , y (lfrit,,"..w es f[]

n w .' *a,*cu.

s. _, '.# *$ -

.4. -

= .

v n

f

.r--

- i!'.:

%p . . q ;q 4 s.

, , sc -r

. c.

~

e

.{q

. *t r

+

OPERATING EXPERIENCE AT GRAND GULF-1 DURING LOW POWER LICENSE PERIOD .

(SEPTEMBER 1982 - JULY 1984)

s. ,

[> o q

GRAND GULF LERS AND PROMPT REPORTABLE E ENT NOTIFICATIONS (10 CFR 50.72) REVIEWED

~

AND COMPARED WITH'OTHER SIMILAR PLANTS RESULTS: -

W N v. -

1.,.2.'s G RATE OF REPORTED EvEMT:.' 7 (AVG: .MO . -REPORT 5 /.% NTH) /" d' PLANT. 50.72 @

PERIOD NO. OF MONTHS . . o.

?lgf 7 D- 4%- >

' ~

LASALLE-1 (1/17/82 8/13/82 4' l1

,w - .. ~

SusouEHANNA-1? 7/17/82 - 11/13/82 4 3 12*

_. _ fi 9/1/82 - 12/31/83 2 GRAND GULF 16 10 ,.-

20' +

j

~

1/1/84 - 2/29/84 '~4 2~

"9 ,

t 3/1/84 - 5/31/84 l7l' 'd 3' '6)'~. -

6/1/84 - 7/23/84 2 ,

3' **

PRl0R To LER RULE (10 CFR 50.73) 1 q

" DATA [.\' COMPLETE DUE TO DELAY BETWEEN EVENT AND REPORT DATE .

,, a 1 4 ,.,3.

. s CONCLUS10NS:

10 CFR 50.72 REPORTABLE EVENT FREQUENCY INIT LLY HIGH WHEN COMPARED TO OTHER PLANTS ~ N PERFORMANCE IMP, ROVING STEADILYJ CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR TO BE EFFECTIVE

. ~

EVENT FREQUENCY IN

NORMAL" RANGE DURING PAST TWO MONTHS - '

~ . W . '~ - '

, i

.a.<;::,.

~ . * %q ?,w l j & ,.'.'y:

, , g r ~;&,g:,:.<.g;w

, , , , e7 u.,,.L -

, 4 N' ** y?.~ WJ ,[ , ' - * - ' 'i,. g l' g : q,p; 11 , , :. . ,' 9 . ; , , -, '.

y. ,

. , .n l

t

,,c.

l - s p, ,

LDI_ DIESEL GENERATOR C: ,.4?y;wM.r am

's' '

\.

J 1[yh i SENERIC E#,ENTS s iT .

MAIN ' CRANKSHAFT BROKE ON TDI AT SHOREHAM -

. :. + . m M

~

- TDI.06!ERS -GROUP FORMED

- ~

k '

\ ms;.

.' STAFF TDI PROJECT GROUP FORMED ;. '

WG

min OWNERS GROUP PROGRAM PLAN. SUBMITTED

"$ . Al a , .

. qd, t, w i

J JG GRAND GUL : EVENTS

?

b.~-" .

D/G OPERATING EXPERIENCE REPORT SUBMITTED

! 'won c@

v. y INTERIM AND UPDATED D/G INSPECTI.0N. REPORTS SUBMIITED g[.$P 6

h. .

~. t .

ONSIT E/0FFSITE POWER ENHANCEMEN.T PROGRAM AND. IREllABILITY

, , : - 16 e "uy.

SUBMI.TTED m

- . .i M,v wmkM uk

$pp:

STAFF EVALUATION OF.D/G RELIABILITY i dj V. . .

'mu kJ n a:

ORDER.. ISSUED..FOR .

TEARDOWN INSPECTION i .

gg . *G

4A - M'4

+

. .-. n STAFF OBSERVED. ENGINE INSPECTION -

J 1. J r .

M I %y . ,

M,g..G,g"* . .'--INSPECTIONANDS,URVEIL.LANCETESTREPORT$UBNITTED-c . .. .

. #a.

i.? .

STAFF EVALUATION OF INSPECTIONS, SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURES . -

by.

U"-

7-ye AND ENGINE' RELIABILITY -

i

- skfk 49 4 3.> g7g lL: ~

. a

V f

\I

.6 . * <

_ , r: 7 g-

.+ , s -

nn

..M' . .

5 -

.e j . ,

+'s t@,

' ^ (p h Q,s. . c ., + .

yc e p r- . .

s

. .mw;: $g

?-i. *

-[f W f. %y-p # ? r+\

L ,; g - . *

~

,&- s ..g-

,. 'g 3 p&

d

-*, , ., 4;..

[A

.. g -,

d' rs. *g'f,. j .'-,.(

. f , , .

T

y. . s a'. _.a. ; + r.

9.

g m,Le;u,,

.>- , . };g

-[v^ y:-. ze

., > ,u r g : * ,

, T:.:Y.1l -

.- .L- ;;j

%fW.[,

L

. KW;y -y f '

, .. l ' ' % s l Q gh

~' .

s q-

~ ,

a b :y Q:sj -R,;

~ Q&,s v e. Q [ :

, ; . ~ . m? G . sy a,n :v

^%p Q M.?li:- ;

,. ,_; -'.*. n' , : '- ' 7. ~ Q ; + n::-

~1 A.#k:v&.at k ~. l .

5f - , ' *d L. . - ~ ., 5 s o v .s:a

'Mg p

' . , , .. _ ,e .H ,, ,

f 1;.

, &' < - a;.,p- --d' u ..

y. , r . .: - * , 4 .-.s ~. *-

]

s i;m'_,;y"*.-!/ . . i '; .

l . .ysp ; ' * '

,-}'v Q hi '40 , V'

$5 * ~P 9 8: .r;,fTij ' 4,v ,, ' _

-;*l*;

,s : .

i le:

'4l.. t 1

'l**

^

,...y-

s6 ^^ '; - m-;;^. sl,r/>4 f' '

,- q$

,*f h ; - "f t 1 i

. s ?

' t --

h: % % ;, b l

W

Q y, -%

s < . 4 A +s

}[Q

'{.L{%n,

p. ; - ..

~

.y + g 9 j'y, ,

?.

, ;3'i + f * -

s

. . s... ,

!h

~

SUMARY,0F GRAND gut.F TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION RE\'IEW PROGRAM r

1 i '

1NITIATED E RCH 1984 .2 Oo :e. - e n,,

e n ,f '

's , ,

s- ,,

,- }

BY MAY I r 1984, MP8L HAD SUBMITTED 416 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION . W,..

>s

. *

PROBLEM 3HEETS (TSPS), ,

I

@y .g 7 . * ' ; il e a ' L. *, 6 ,

.l.

Q "~ r PROBLEM 3HEETS-DEVELOPED. BASED ON COMPARISON:0F TS WITH:

w

's[f

..gz. w

=. .* . .n p psg\t s _ 4y.

'~ * ..:...

AS-30!LT PLANT Ea la .*

.SER

'J TC OTHER DOCUMENTS .,

A_

BWR f6-STS .

C. .

f.

,_ y. .

x .

moq- .

RJ-

. 1- m u.P .

= :ME .

0F THESE 416Y D":

.? <

~

W+

m w.

.~.

?, -+ - * .'

1 ITEMS REQUIRING CHANGES TO TSe h,na

. 220 -

ITEMS REQUIRING NO, CHANGE M

i . .

. ," 168 c

%c

CHA ES1 IMPLEMENTED BY. ORDER 4/18/84 22

4 #r e$

33 n:;I . Q yW .

', . i f .. ,~

'C H A 'ES IS' n, w

v. .

y " ,,

SUED ,WITNTMENDMENT$$1f o."

.4 w' - < <. m- -

o L J' T ' ' ~6 ; 2T3 3 >n

,."..'-. ,<ryct4 c ,1 : ,' .- ;. . .

.-W.

_g .4 jg.s,

b. ~ 'n' '

7: g:y d,m ;.. /

.g

w W .<

T0 Tali.

v. . v L . 1 s,m M .Vw^ .

- .~416, m M

-F-

.MM.

= - ,,

4 ;e ,r, - g-..

M 4,

.16 ,

m,.3, vc' 0F THE 220_ REQUIRING _ CHANGES y j-3

. _ :q -

-y s, ;/. 1.J '

N g$s,6 r e a >-1J,. R x

~

w - < ma bet, T0 hEFLECT AS-BUILT PLANT:, f, ~

.M 7 34 M, t _M

' N. * , .

T0 h0MPLY 'W1TH tiEW ,RE60L ATORY lREQUI REMENTS ~

51 .

. . W f ,. MM v..? I>

i s":.

Y.TO' : .

ENHANC,E THE TS1 -. 3

.c - , .

64: @W ss%m

. w. . c ..

THAEARE ADMIN.ISTRATIVE .s y~ W%1 %+..

~6 (Q h cW

+ '

.70 TLARIFY, ORIG..I,NAL.E. INT.ENT[0Et . ..

T S ;- e c, ,:45. m!; @9 @m a M g4 : e .

.i d- y< > E V M,_b.3 ETHAT ARE'ED1,T.0R1AL V . . M_ . -A : F a.

w>a >: . . 3

. A. ,, n

.ynm;y , n, . 2 avom c.. c 1 - *

...o s - . - ,

4 o we Mm

. ' + 9 lh ,.. - E 'n - . . . .

- sm .f

- 7.so -.,

vy ny, +, e., t~ Q S, . . +

4, t.wa- t cec xw

.N: TOTALt / J, .*+ +e, z: . m.. p. fic y

g. , M ..: , ~y -.- q . v. 2' 2fn0 .-ww;.r.w..ea w.

5 '

n '

w ,

. Ka ?,P, ..

6v. ,

,f 4

[ ; U .5

-k gn' ] "f $ '

, .,< _ / J gDQ' y

'e -

Pg. g g 3 ; g - ( f;" y g ' ; Qgg

!w* :1m ,, - ?

% , [ , eA=. ,y ,;

s, ;

.. . y

..,'e

.;~% .,

_._a - w;;'f.~

j:*

G,

.-g? y .

} g ., g , h 4, ,.

e

~g .*d s# ' . . ? , .w . L d 7. t f 0;; N {4 W;n".'g* hd? , , ,

.f N:w ' i.* ' ..,,: u 4 ,

f -f-. r CH , a f pp

, 4 i 7 92.9 ~

.r n, .N

. 463

, ,3 ;f . ' p __

a~-3 ' :s3

- ' ~ .

.1.%y% l ..c y ,H -,;g * , . . . ; Aj . ,

s' ' n e,

..y ,*

L p< -

y ' ,

-p M tc.

, y$ fy). -

wx-~

v- ja

m wm

,.sa k

.?.g ' ~ J ' , . i '. , (4 _. ] ";,. . y '

- f. "Jf r ~ * " , J C. :"

^

f cl , ? k Ih5f s e .f f' '

k * ;fN 0 .~~~v

3

.n-' ,,

o ..

PL.A..N.T MANAGEFENT CHANGE

,, 9r a.. .

x 9i

. i ); e*l3 REVISED PLANT ORGANIZATION - THREE PLANT MANAGERS (SUPPORT,. -

~.,

.- e m.

m.m. - ~

OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE) c-e w- ~ cc . . -. --

E $.j

<p'< :f;y a viu8.s4 a no ns3 I s inD n w .a. nt A 9 4 5 Y [.

Is u_. #WV l@Vl\ 5C -A m, , m ,, . . . ~ . - . . s..,.

.. ,nnf

~

m.yw m. < nw w- ay p- v.:.v

' y$ 5: .

.n. AS.SI STANT PLANT MANAGER - OPERATIONS REASSI$NED -, AS G a n mu,,.-e MA4AGER -

/. MW i

v n.

TRAINING STAFF STRENGTHENED

t

,m;{gg

.-m E

HI. RED NEW TRAINING SUPERINTENDENT ,. . .

, WITH PREVIOUS JNDUS

~w 4.. -

4 Sci E. EXPERIENCE w

A a

' 1;, . MaA

%g

~ .

f * .

HIRED ; MANAGER PLANT ORERATIONS ,, - ,

AND : TECHNICAL' ASSI e

WITH PREVIOUS'BWR,' LICENSED EXPERIENCE ~ ,$@,

V'-

~

y n, t.'EXPEMENCED . SHIFT, ,SUPERI TENDENT REASSIGNED, 4 z.

3,,w, s o. .: ,

, AS OPERATIONS s Ai

-w U o t'.s. .

. Aa o..

-W_ q !kw SUPERINTENDENTa.

. _ - - V ,

/ el3

~ -

6 #

i d h.

~

CORPORATE REOR'GANIZA a

.y+

, . [f , ' . g I - 4 N0 d k.[' . . s

,-., . c 9

,'. s* '45 {,

q'

.e

. 'Q i

' ) , , , ,

'Iyh hig

-r

.- 7- ' 4 4gc d e ;r .~,

, . !' :.n.; 3-

'l .

a : m h*hf t

n'

,,~ ~

< s. _

i ,

.~

, ~,

/. ? - > yy 3 _

t . s ?? -

s efy ? j

_4l .6, ,C. -

; j *^

- -f. - . .,,.

,, - . <.<y~> .

4

.,,+;, e ** 1 s'*

c 1 , , J;A Nf ,r k 3

- w- , ,

-~

g* g, y a

+.,

,; .x .

7 , . ,. -

o.

~0 .y n Wn i ~

n. , w. ,

, . s ;'

' a-

.g q; J =

. . ,.('

.?y*:. ' " 'e:

>" 'R

.' % ^- + s- k Q.%'s:y'l

.y . y q .y . .j < s e f ,, -,'

- # , A f M* W "4

.,u ,

-p- ,

.',: . , y ~

9% .

,c. (A .ji s' 5 1 '* ; , ,

((, 3 7. ..c fi.y V/, 7 W

-W M T j .d .d. G 7 q . cj ; 4[ % *-

v

{,.q r w(# ,

.i

pml ..J

~

~3 g . , y

,a: ,

, 4 5 l ' j .'

3-

[j-gg

$; , g' D.A.

, g y,

m,i.'f ,

m..... .h:y..: m w, m ;. y t,; ; .w=,. < , , x,;, -Q ,u 3- .w: a- ;

. ; t ., ,

,.K, 2. ,, hg ,~e. '- ~ "'

3* ' , 'T

, ,q 3 y a,. f)b g.:;

755 V ., '._y

,' a .. ' * '

.A4 .

,"'m.. f

t. d'. -

}~. e, s._,,, ;

pt%re,%- ?*' ' -?y' D.q .= , ., ~ > Q..wi%W % N, ...J fij s p

' "4 ~'. 1\ - >~

' &;5 .

" h. 4 __ .. ,

g a,.,

y r % ,.**.

u t .'L ~ _, _

9 ->_ '.J r.5 .Q .m ' }_; ' $ Q ~s q

',, ' .l= ) [ ' *q ^ '~

L-* -QQ u -

as" ^~{

n ., y 4,. ;; ,.8

- 4,y sy:

y. .J;w,. 7L:

- o.

, . x : ..; 3 ?

yq ,. n. < >

,7 ,3 M, ; ;.

h

g, , ;

m. t , . s _ 4 :;. g . . . .

so 'Q-s m.q,

~ ,. .

,r, ,3 Ku . j;g .,

y .' , 5

, , g. O _ g; > -; g ,;

g..4,g,< . -- o.g;?

. a.,, are i p)m m.- : r. ~ r : ,d '

, 2

. *:< - L. , fi s .X Q R?ts = o , ',sW

!g; , L a:4: }:p~j- . . .

fslV , s,' +s ,,; w% ;

Iy

,. ,t n ,mr #,.

Q~)l , ~ ,A ", "

s+.j- t. l ii %,. .- l ',' ,9 !

_.%'. *i ; q , %.Q. . ! ' ~. * *

^

w 2 ,.

w# u. t... 's'Jef :....a 'ff'

~;..t' s ,,-"se; '- < 1 s

, .~;:::

n,

,.>v. , ' i ^ ^l

>:q- .~ Ci: t

. 4' - #' :,.}

,- y;,?y-

,, r +d

,,3 j i =[ ~. l M i'...' t f _M ' ,' s

-g + ' 4 , *-0 ' ' W.w. A s;- r ' *, 'g'i,Y7' / N, d . , f ' . J :' ( f

4.

,t ' ' '

e -- e., j - , .et ' , ' , , ' - i

" > - . < -~g e > . ** g

. ,' ; .: ' b a

. ,;> ' ,:~?,l , %. ,

.' , - Li ' . , . .' . '

.. L, m(,' M e a

M^ . . ,,s,.AQ~ , , $ U , . 4,3. ' = 3 F

.u,d i. . ' ]: i. , 6 hs

(* g '-

p % ,.4 , [m' l* .l".- [ m^Ylt , ,.

/J ~

.s..-

~~,

i,W 'y ' -

'r 7

4 s

~

" f *, * .* ( ' N* -~ .. (( ~ ,

. yf ( *-by ? .-l i,W'

. & ; ' .pf - '

p-Q (,,g

,. i. = ';

V. ; ', ' , g/; l T;'6p ;$

sp m w

,4 7 ,

7 -QS y y yn

-. y ~

. ; , , .= ,

. i.. .. ; g h

b .

J I OWARIS0WOF LI CONDITION OMNCfS

, BE4ttM.J.lttNbt 1 ' %ND FULL MtN AITRfEE

+

LP LICENSE FuW PDWER LICENSE CONDITLONS '

. PLA. W. ISSUED ~ NH. H. PbDIFIED ADDED

. LA SM.LE 1 -

Ofi/17/82 08/13/82 0 3 ,

lA SALLE 2 12/16/83 03/2.3/84 1 -- O

p. tr 2 12/20/83 . .

04/13/84 1 0" ,;

.- SUSQUEHANNA 1 -

07/17/82 '07/17/82 10 , .6 w, ~

c y-

&mmANNA 2-05/23/84

05/27/84 0 1 0

W~ , e~

4 SAN ONOFRE 2, : 02/16/82 09/07/82 - 2 ~3 ' &.

g 4- .

SAN ONOFRE .3. . 11/.15/82 11/15/82 14 7 SUMMER 08/06/82 11/12/82 ,

4 2 .

.# ~ . . .

M- GRMS Gut.F ;l . 05/15/82 N/A -. 19. .

.'ll - , ,

i

., . j y#,.-: s '

~

p . , , a c+ -' -

DIAsto CA nn1 '.09/22/81 , .-N/A .. ,

13 5 s ?

& 'g L .4 r

'g' ' ~

~

5:

' g .'.s.

v

,1 ,

,9.g f .s - fj

f._ j,_! ;

L, " )) . v '

~

1 ',

d2- * ,,_ y ? y

~

m j ^$%

. E

.r. -

,a q .- ,

n ,34

< /

(

m

~

, - lt -

. .s

, ' . 1 .'

N

hN y 9 f

c 4

. *y'e g[ '[ [,'i t :, : . * ' ,'

- -. :[ &

,.,.u-

. y~

?

- - .. , T ..

p7 *( f4

,, ca s. , , , -. .. .

" I

. .r E'

. g j '.

,b."g. f' e i

.y . - > c. --

.,',, g , , .

_. / p V W . ;I, f , - %*L,

~

. sl l -

. < l r * )i

, y

. *z [. , f 's_. _

4 l.i

~ . . 1 .

.7' {

O 'N' '#

.{ g j' . .' ,

'I l $. h

~

q .

. . s, , : .

3 . t' [.

> c * :u s .

.y .m 9, - ,s

,a

,y s x - s, -

. m i. . i

- s .. .

E' L. ,e k-

,s t

.g...

-, . r

.' .h '\

%.p .Y ' .c_q

,.N' p j

m h

3

.2 s' .

^

+ -

[

g f 4

.-a./ .4,,

e,

~ s > ,

's }* *.__) ,_R

, y) ,, ., "_ >

, f

- -p , G,.,jg.4>(

J 1 yp;. + ,

4 ,

s

.q ,

^

- + , e

. x ,

, = \.g , M , 4 g.

. .u;. '

V .b - , N . <

" ,. " 3;t. - y 1

v- - 5

,f j / .* g '_ , ys -M

.y' #, ; . y /t q {.N

.c ,s .y. <

, .- 3

+- .-

ff,

, sw.- .

tj %, - . ,

', 3. ,

.i'

.?]I p t '

{ " p[ q

'T , p. -

V! k: y -

' ~

A.

. /.

s .'

c 3 -

L.l . ., ,}.; z .; _q}; 'y'g

,,). - , .

.-*hNY e p (

p p ? . er g 9 , _

hd .', ,

.1 ,

p ','e'f th 'E,4 Q 1, ; %, '

t- ,a h.c =

" ~

. g '

~ ' m/f .e

-~g' *' N:

~'

f. fi t; Y ,

j

,.[., ^

p] :Q +

!! & C.'] f y t} . / gg gr*yppg p g {*g ,

4 -

t I

i 3 4 . ,

.h ( t y

s .

I).R.YR. LL .CO_O. LING SYSTE. M =

. PROBLEM I e

e INSUFFICIENT COOLING CAPACITY IDENTIFIED DURING NON-NUCLEAR' ,-

HEATUP TESTING w

~

MODI FICATIONS TO SYSTEM:

~

W REWORK O,F REFLECTIV.E INSULATION c . . .

_# g< -

~

ADDITIDNAL INSULATION INSTALLED . -

M,n

. . ~

a 4

AIR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ENLARGED , l' g .

ADDITION OF 1200 TONS CHil.LER CAPACITY ;

t e

4 MODIFIED'SYST.E.M. PERFORMANCE ACCEPTABLE' '

, p f f

.? n h*'

" .* 1 .

L.ms

{.: 'r, a s? ' <

..41A- v

l. * ,-* ?~ '

.p ,. , n

4 3i Q

[ [. m

,<t ,- l 6 'y .'

4- ' - t

.p,. ,y- ;q t n .4 .

t ?' '+

' ' s j a. , '

k %.% N k e h A, . p p. s : 1 .& rf . ; j. ,y ^ y.v. .1 i'.

~

, y .% *)g ,.

y(' , ,

[y[,,

.. ,p 4% r%

$ . k , ' y s, ~s *-

e 4

, . =Q 6:

2 # *.

h j N- g .*$

,s . . ,

.b 1 rk i s ,

+ + 3 s ' p* .- ~. .. > , i ,

j 4' 's .Y

\ -

7

-,f'k^*. s

sJ. 4 .

,J'

-s O *

y , . , <3 ' . jk [. ' 31 i + s .

3 x

e-g

c, ,,., < , .

5,, g-cy. 4 g 'f4 Y,

ce. +4

,'ft <

/ e

+

s r -, 4' . .'

4';[.{#,i m' i", s ',.*

, s

. .;. g . . , . .

3:;-

2, -

3;* r >

o ;.. , f *' .1% ; 'l;i rk

, ^.

. 1

.5 ,

,-3 ;

t *~ % - .

, [ g..- ; 7'.;,

5 'y q ~ ,

v '. '

'i ,

(.c;;, ' .y;\ _ i% r ' . .

r -~ + ,[, p 3^ [g., %

[ Mo N ~

/

y% [ , .M ' ," '

f' 2 1Z

-,.,q, p. e, y - . -p . s- -- -. ---', ;;,. !. .q . 3.g1 - ?* . g- n 3 , , , ,

< , . 1 <_. .., . s <

g.h ,.; ' I .#m -\

u .

I *..#'m' 5 47 ? - .,

C # &-

4 '

t

y. '; e - ,f...- jr _-- }if y. _ ,y

%. *g ., . s , .,

.,W * ..4.', s

'#'r"-' -2 x4 n

y 3: y? A %L :', e n%m ns .s1'.o ,

,r

D, , #; %,'M

.' m 1, , , 1 l , :

's :2 s; y;p.f ' s- r > + h L . Q < g. ', * , '. ?: ' {-

' i L, .. W L'h';f '*s &. . :y4;3. P

'h.' l#v0, ocf Qi3 khp. 7.- ~j ,

-:,,;r '-- ? [~ r -

'^f 7 qq l Y (fp ' l[',,.- Q j

g' v - n i'q .

, j Fvqs%MW;w - -

~

s,- & , p ,

m

~

g-v +. = '

- - g%

. 3 m, quy

r. . % n . '-..,a.

.a.

,.s

c's s. * * ,,9- u;w ,pA . :

.*/- ,

g. g -. , y cu 3 ,. ,. ,- y-s 4 -,.

.)v .f,

^^ 3p.*{y. ngf g c3. 4.. q . ; 4s, -

'7

i . ?);E G

- / . \ n, ni-1,. ' f. ' q-1 p '#7 ;d"if , . *f'h% - w .q;,

~

.n

~

.g

.y :.. , .<

s_ <-

-rs '

~q sy3

-}-

sn 5

._ e a'

a%

,4, t . ,;.,7. [ JA~.$- -l^;,. ;L ia 8

, t , ,, I fA '

: L-- . - , + .

n .o - - - .w

< r * ? ' .3 &0:,,

~

+

e . l wU"yM.; :,.'i

} y 'f:

, m -

79- .

g .

i d ". '

s . *..

.n "G,.,,

-(

[. y"

.,,I . . - ;. , . .S-

,-"s

. . < , .. '. tys . , . , - ~, -m

(,

_ . _ . . _ . . . ~ ,

-:k**tM ! -P

, sm .

geggr.m 3 : 6i 4f 4 WA,., ,A jgg

~

.g

-a, - w ccpy

. . r,. , ,

may. ,

1

%, ^2 r;, ' ..j ,

- jj .

m .; .

nn + -

~

STANDBY SERVIC.E WAT.ER BASIN 4..

?+M W.:1.

. m. w

. . , + .

a>; . ao r

_. .-. ... _ . ~

s

-n. w

_" + .

s .,,~ . . .

m

. ,. m .A-

,4. A

. .- g

~ .

?n

~ .y o'*

a' r PREOPE RATIONAL TESTING IN 1981-82' IDENTIFIED LOW ELOW CAPABILITY

. . ms f m+ .

, w%a a. -

o VE f' dd Y e

. CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED -

p LARGER PUMPS AND IMPRO\ .

c'

. " . . r mm.. .

~

- s - z.K

,w , . ~

3w.

.- v .. am w]

V.

m.

x INTERIM, ACTION REQUIRED' ISOLATION OF SOME COOLING.SYSTEMSj; PIPE O M ,

m g -

I" SIZE Pj0DIFICAT10NS. AND A REDUCTION.IN THE USEABLE ' BASIN' . .

9

." w An

' ~~

CAPAC.ITY

. .m w .. .

s.

r- ,,- -

.-

t . e .m 4 my

x. y t,.( a x

4 s

,w+ ;;' :

,i p i n ? PPsL1BECAME AWARE OF ULTIMATE HEATsSINK TUHS)

.- ' ,g.

~

_ _ w ,u IN I

ML SUPPLY IN MAY 1984 -

o- ., J 4 -

W M,As.

s-

. g'., - ,- , ,,

r 4

,.,p- .,,,.,-

s .

% f .[,h

%j Q 4,

f M. fg s -

. , V ,

L_.L PLANT SHUTDOWN TO INSTALL PASS!vE SIPHON SYSTEM ,

, .m.

,~..

%,. s w .'. +. ,

..., m. ... ~ ,

.~

.. 3 q 4 .3 ;4 3,,

;. . ~ .. ,

am3

. , . - . , . . . w 5

~

.8 :... 5 MDDIFI EDLSYSTEM. ,7 ; gmcmdO 6 5

INSTALLED ;_c AND TE'S'TEDf p$a$@d m ::

twce n .. -

w-o w- . .

m~ , n.g v

,. x a

+t . m+ m.waw o<gW* .;c g-

<4

......s. s

,. i,, ., -" -. ' . . . . . , .,-,,. p; ;.

y .. t

,.g...

q .. - f* . <_ . .;"' >c.. 4. a. m ; qUy gd

_o Q4 S , . E i 5$ g

7. g T p: SUFFICIENT CAPACITY, y 7:y ny4:m;; g sg ,gggg@m EXISTS FORJ30-DAY; UHS 1 SUPPLY vw 3p y ww .m- ..+ j77$

wc a n n,

wwwy . ym, .,

x z c n s y {s u qMF' b :x W Q uwn~ ;.

s x@. -'

.s m:- yo /

Uk%HN.A .i . W %< "' '

i .>f. $ :c d y ~ qDW -

w.i ;%%g 'y/W3/ n 7,

W.%. , }D s .

. 75 ll ~

c a.

p

%. .. w w ay; e &. =

f Q ? f =) ' ( ( f.f f % l . %, . . &

f, . ,%.

T 'd.\' 1.

v i

' , *^

'["

4

-a . ,

i -f ' s m-l f--

-Ni

, M%q 4 < { .~hWk wxt n

L

, , , , *W , s l., a, -

i g .t- .. f *. .- #

# 1, f' ;,'i

?

A;J . , ,.

~. y - v

. ,.,u" , . ' h ;. . , + w '

,s

- w

).. 3.

u

. "pm v- -y e

~

a ,to ;y ;+g . . n~.,p 1

5-

, ,c f , ,,

. -4

,"44 ..

s. ,s

.-t 3 4'

~ .h .

, <e

.,.4.. .1 A.Df

m :l ,.&.;~ ~

7. >

y. ~' ?.mY, y[$ y l*&

. . ., 5 T .' ' + '

k . ,2 ~- - - - . ,

~ ' '

u _. ,

_L . q .

_. ,};;( :

h[ ) ( h l

ng,y . , . -.

REVIEWS OF GGNS :

l

' l SHIFT ADVISORS (SA) PROGRAM )

u. , x . .

.J" , ' : BY, IllDUSTRY .

2- o L

_ m SIX MEMBER UTILITY ADVISOR EVALUATION TEAM <;

~~

e EVALUATION CONDUCTED APRIL 211-26, 19811 L i

~

1

, ' REVIEWED ALL ASPECTS BETWEEN. SHIFT AREAS AND SA'S, ~ 4 -

. ,.?

p~

PROCEDURES AND EXAMINATIONS ..;~

w# -

. s m - < J

FINDINGS y

2 -

EFFECTIVE PROGRAM 7

QUALIFIED INDIVIDUALS .. .

O.- -..

c, .

. APPROPRIATE TRAINING .

p.:S c n,,..

. BY.NK, . .. . > . c a~n - . x m +

m gw

.y o

S M,#r, y OBSERVED OTEC BOARD'EVALAUTION '

wu.

INSPECTED SA TRAINING, EXPffRIENCE AND DOCUMENTATION T IN.TERVIEWED M'NAGEMENT, A SA'S, OPERATING AND TRAINING . ,'

-e

_s,. PERSONNEL % 'J .:- 9' N . -

- + QM r.

1.- . .-

. mys.

!:e: ln -;? 1 -

RESULTSl0F. FINDINGS ? . cV : - ~t J~

c.

n. . y : --,- m,J. sY:w, r

M .9 c

+ ^,. 4.4 n ,

m . - m c, ."

u ~. i 1 i > >- . .-

. ~. #

,,=I.SA'.S ADDED.T0 REA.D.ING PROGRAM -

, . :,.3 m.. . : .S7 te

'SA'S_ADDEDzTO FULL STH WEEK REQUAllFICATION TRAINING

. .<.y A

, c .

'C 7

PROGRAM ' .-

. . :- s :. .

+

NRR .

- +

. g.,

. jh

.m

. . . . n m 1

e 1

. REVIEWED: ..; y . <

2, ;; y 4

~

N.

:v 9q. ... .

' ?- SATTRAININGIPROGR'AMlAND EXAMINATIONS ,

d

j M.3 #

$p[# h..

~

m Qc

i. $, %:'_-::SA< -

V' JOB l DES'CRIP.IIO.N,SiAND QUALlF_ICAT10NSlmY

~

. Q })h ' Q, .

g 7 l: , , , .

. + . ' :; y .3 9 +:Q L;' . ," y~" b y Q W;9 m. ?

k g,4g,N y y en .FINDINGS pm N ; . d WQlp* Q t :&;Q,nWe sqp i.Wg m-1 M% -:s; %' ',, -M;n b3 % ;; 7 f e 2;

, ' ; r J mg::x !,fQ

'MR.MW r

^ y:

m4 s r- e w g , ,, ,.9 :

i.w-STRAINING , , ., a g , m ;, ;- L 's

~tPROGRAMiAIS, ,

-_*.z.

EXAMINATIONS:ADE0UATE -

e, ~t < W 9:94 y,jp.a s,- ~

<! m-

W = ,.- SAfS?TRAININGjPROGRAM MEETS WORKIN w -

m , -

a.

W. .J.lSA'S?MEETINDUSTRY;RECOMMENDEDiC5UALIFICATIONS i t' " -

~ j .- go ,

j, m S :,m JM g, f ~. &?< y,w sy.4 ,} N 3 ,

[Nl7.'}fm j, -(' .-j ^

u -

c w . .. ,. a ~

e .. [ f g "A . ..x

..~

~

b 1 O? Y$ .k * *Y .

1

.g, ,

3q

. I c w l

' [W ; Q I

, OPERATING STAFF EXPERIENCEi. p- dM.%.

._:,J ? si .

~< ,g=

t o ("

,o.s

-' 1 g ;i,p. np qf. -

.Wy?;gg yy y,

,~, w. .. .Jy

r. , , &p y~., A . w.

, p: . 1 g

is ,

i

~

~a; wg . n

. ., m v.. '<

. q ,

~ - - '

2:# "

s _,

m,: i a'r T

, m a.m,:

n

, ,. ~

'BWR EXPERIENCED A'DVISORS JCONSULTANTS)!EACH -

x~NIMM .en wf aMM T '- N SHIFT UNTI.L 100% POWER - .

, . . , a"t L

..: r-

.e :

, g: p

' < g

y. '

t p2

! [. -

. , v .;

w c

; ~.

- ,.. L

.=.w -

. , n. v

, n.. .

,r s .

' 1C . . ,M~ M 4x ADVISORS WERE CERTIFIED"ON 6 RAND GULF l

w:

Y".. ].',

nvn ? ;a. y }

+

4'; l ". y%

4 4 ; .i .

,. t, . y s;a .. .

4 eW L . .,m

,. a, _

a g4

,e ~,

. . r , . . , ,.

s*

l,;,g,g.

j4 ., , EXPERIENCED ADVIJORS.TO, OPENATlIONSiSU,PERINTE.NDEN a m m .

, ay ~ s . ..; =.

%~

Aum .

. a. .

,n

, y.

4~-. 4. g, s. c.p~, 4 ,, - ; sg g,~

, _,3 ;

m.. s ~. s,

- a..

., ~ ms . .. .

N.

- . .g' YO VICE PRESIDENT '

.fl s y? , ' ,

. EXPERIENCED ~ ADVISOR 4

f _

MOCLEARh. ',

~ .

M.%,$

W_ _

~

. ,T .

OPERATION..S . . .

o : . s. -

,r L4;

.c -

s 3 . .-

.{,

'E . .

p u '

-3 4 r s

.n}&q n a :w .%

9

e. . ;; ,

"g 3 Q'M,.?>

~

n i

Q * * '

,.A 2 ,d :

. y. . _

,. - .I aG- ;

w y g ., 9 9, t.

a n - - u. t. t..t .

p-s g g:d'm,$. S STAFF 0BS{RVED ADYISOR

-s 1 $

+' d$~=6 A

+ "jR'AIN%.'y~s,,a.ND7E -

,J F L.y ':14 -;

^^ -

1-

.%,. *-:(:qi

- , p > :}

4

$ ,3;i.c ,( _c

.: Q t:W "

., esf ts s. ,,

l .

>D =M I. Q,&

i

,,,. l e , _s 5- ,

4s-c, 3 p iv , -. A 3 g.s __ja3gM. . . ,;- . ._ <-1 . n%-, . c f . sf, 7 m;, 5

,e ,r. .

.- e. 6t y- ,s .c

- +

.t

> 4 ^";p7* ', s'

,s :

,4,., ,y" z t . 4"4 l^"' y !y , a?*f ' 'y ~'-"i 4

= $. s . . ; r .s *

,_. m :p j ( f. , ;, ' "-

E 4/

w.e 3 '." d.

Q

i M(fdyM t i;_. _

' ,3- .

e e .

'.h I (: -

- w" % ASSESSMENT BY U'f!LITY"AIiVi$iOR EVAL'UXTIOkTENI-

_s . - - . m,,.y-- 3 ,.e ..s. s - i- r* 4s N,3 y w b, g sa

.- s t >, .4.-a.'. ~, e 3

,n , ,w

, * ' :)m- y

.n

.~.

. s

.. -,. +.

A i

p, , m,.. ,gs 1

' n$

,7 v

s. ,m, e,t - 'e

,:w

. . . ~s . ; g* , .

( .

m. -

.{

p 7 ;g , 9 ADVISORS ARE. ADEQUATELY TRAINED [AN0jMEET

. , . ; m> >;n :: :. w; 1 _. p ma p; q,

u. ~p~ , ..

,, e m ey 4;~

~'- , e 9.@Q ~ , . -%:y 4

e r.. . , , , , {-

_ #f : , .* yyf _ .f .)^ . , ,Q s

y. 3. y ' $ t; Q .

. ,t, qu a ' :

.~,,3

' A d' *

- A .J m

mp an A -.

1 s -, yn

.,;* - s q

a, v s

/,3~ }j > .

g ww;;/ .<w% e v

. gy V s

/,

e eJ<L3

";; . :k.x; 1. b7ea<3- -

am v ', y a,.w, -x' R ',g ..p-n, e j.". "t

,, M w ;9 .,,

._ *j c f

.,4+,-..G~. ;:m wy,,m u Mr m, ..c,g; .x.,_1*

-.,,4e

.7

a. -

,., _ k i . r#

y

+ %,

.o,,,

a

k ;::g: 9 *h w %; ;:' M ; 7 i , N;.

.. s

~p5y.-. 's pa:

-g-3 ; - -

'sr+ ...Ja

, f 4 .1; ' s

'r ..d69.. g $ .%l g ? y4.i-'3 $ ,r e 1 7g _ c C'= t ,.m n

,.q'.,,' i,..L

~ F Q >. 3. ~m%pf..

3 _ ;) j u d a

t N ( '-=f1 '* # st . r+

'J'#

/ i'[W,'? Oh E &&n f; . jh6Qf s

'ge .--

.:p ' 30&' R$y A

i

.AO&S h',l,?.,+,y-.Cp&.:,g( ;+G l' 0 &y-UE $'d': n e- a 4: a, w, ell'bt.6 n~ p.

w. m CG-M& r e a'; ' y, ':

p;&.

+

+ t%

g 9 iM,: n&. 4,:n.;r;;p v

q; v..-- ;;;;22% . .;.) % . 'a * , ::pg

%,N.., ,,.. :.

.. ... y tr . .9 %..,-.Sw&. _W,'?

n.+

~~-:.v.,O y %,. oA:+.n..r.m_ f q .,

.y ; a sp ,M..w.L.v::: 7 -- *3

.x . & , -

%' ? q h t V 5'Z ' ?.~ [*' Y^~N'

~m . ..< g M,?,l :-l #ni~n$

1 m s 3

.% '} V,1 Y k .?f TY. ,!:'e*&%- y:( 0 y

? Gu V J':'sQ' .?gf%' i~

hk

-++ ..<,.3

>k h, -

?

S N h,_.

hi -

.. &~M N' j9 k,V

.k.

wIC;-si '+Y TL:' < - '

M* s R

'$myhk

.* & A TM.; ..':

M n h. j N ;$ h JQ h.k sm{R;.M ~

%,6h&N%y[N^^hlf:Qi?F% h 3 I.h wg .m tkhkhh a w?.7'p hkw'~[hh@

y4 w% fry, e' ~'h-h;W , _ my.~ XiL9 wg::5.} '.%og/* .

m%

\.'*.) , y.4. . m[l.w.m'Y, e . 5 .y}

s s, 4,%

g.

p q. . : V .1,rW F n.:. 4 W,

,(, , m y WJf,y , * :~,

N:t,c~e,.% , " ,Qy;f . q9 ,;Q M; .M Q.) n:Wy%, :n m. 9,;Q, *, y , m .. 4 m

m. n eA .

                                                                                                          ? !T l:.j ..L'yAff~

s, c; ^ ' -grep!{: f b% Q r y t -

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       'd       -   ..
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 ";)Q:            . Q                f      %]              my%L;             gg .&w.m-;m.t[,                                      '
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              .e E

f fj . n_ m. m:

p . y. ~ vn . y u, km ,.W -pn ml : . n ~. . m n w 9.:n--n, . ;.3A. $ .,,g g =_dQ

                                                                                                  .                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          7 r, t ,,., r n n.. ,z4*                                                                                                                            ;;,                                                                                                                             y c. .:.4       w
                                                                                                .v ,. ,                                   -r                                                                          ;- v...   < + - ~ + ey a ,m.x e.

[*v.g\ g { . .

t . . r[ ( '*' M, ;>-9 ' . ;# ; Ap r 'i..pn ' ]:n m';Y' y

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        -w} 'f>-?.e2. wc , m.y_m"
 ~ 2 , ;. . _. ;.                             ,                                                                                                                 >.

p(. n.r.: . ejsh.i .> .. ,1.>w?

+- ,,

j j.N.' #.V . 2;c' a u ;; a..n(y .

                                                                                                          , g  M g(                                          ,[
                                                                                                                                                    +                               , .
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         -'y -o ~ m :j _ 3
      . . , , . ..c.4,
                                                                                                                                                                                - -. :p                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            s p'.m. n ,m                                 ;.                    .a                            -                   ,
                                                                                                                                     .f - -

a m ~p y,sl

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    ?D    e%          g-Q  (:           . d
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     . m.t .

x. N lG b,?y y k&C s ,, ,.

v n ;. _.- =*l . . ' f 'tI 5Ka , .. g ; wg&[G 9 ' s: $' "; f~ &

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     .t,
                                                                                  &,@:. W;                                                , -4 Q m,, Q 4 v (e, j'W. M,%p[.y                                                                                                            s y

y k'[y N+ = _ 1AU M: j- Q .T.p ' h d y h} Uh . e $-.-y m+p(m. ';( ,%.' Fh$W

k

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            -               4 d

y

m , PPEL PANAGBEIR CAPABILITIES VANAGD E R PERFORVANCE EXPAND NUCLEAR TRAINING AND EXPERIENE UPGRADE QUALITY OF TRAINING INCREASE EFFECTIVEESS OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS PANAG& BIT INVOLV9 8 R IN DAY-TO-DAY ACTIVITIES DECREASE IN NONCOMPLINiCES NUCLEAR EXPERIENCE BOE CORPORATE AND PLNH MANAG9ER CHANGES SHIFT ADVISORS EXPERIENCE EXCEEDS INDUSTRY STANDARDS

              . REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR INVOLVD O R                            ,

PP&L MIDDLE SOUTH lHILTITIES 4 t l 1 s _,. _m._ .,

                                       . PLANT MANAGBiNT Q1Af4G_ES o       REVISED PLANT ORGANIZATIN - THREE PLAlH fW4 AGERS (SUPPORT, OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE)

ASSISTAfd PLAf6 MANAGER - OPERATIONS REASSIGNED AS GENERAL MANAGER TRAINING STAFF STRENGTHB E HIRED NEW TRAINING SUPERINTENDBU WITH PREVIOUS INDUSTRY EXPERIENCE HIRED MANAGER PLANT OPERATIONS AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANT WITH PREVIOUS , BWR LICENSED EXPERIBICE - EXPERIENCED SHIFT SUPERINTENDEhT REASSIGfE AS OPERATIONS SUPERItHENDENT

b L- _ . . _

P11RT OPERAll0!{ DURIRG LOW POWER TEST ON SEPTEMBER 23,1983, REGION 11 ISSUED A CONFIRMATION OF CONCURRENCE LETTER TO PP&L STATING THE NRC CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANfiED SCHEDULE FOR ECRITICALITY AND DOCUMENTING CERTAIN OTHER ACTIONS AGREED TO BY MP&L. THAT LETTER WHICH WAS SIGNED BY MR JAMES P, O'EILLY, RBiDVED THE ESTRAINTS IMPOSED BY THE OCTOBER 20, 1982 CAL AND IMPOSED CERTAlti OTHER RESTRAINTS ON FUTURE ACTIONS. THE OPERATING LICB4SE ALLOWED RECRITICALITY AND OPERATING UP TO 5% POWER UPON C&PLET10N OF ALL REQUIRED CONDITIONS AND SURVEILLANCE TESTS FOR LOW POWER OKRATIONS. THE GRAND GULF REACTOR WAS AGAIN TAKEN CRITICAL ON SEPTEFEER 25,1983 AND THE PLANNED TESTING CONDUCTED AT LESS THAN 5% POWER. LOW POWER OPERATION AND TESTING CONTINUED THROUGHOUT OCTOBER 1983 AND WAS WITNESSED BY VARIOUS REGION 11 INSPEC-TORS,. IN THE JUDGfEiT OF REGION 11, THESE OPERATIONS WERE CONDUCTED IN A SAFE, DELIBERATE AND PROFESSIONAL MANNER, AND ERE VERY SUCCESSFUL, ONLY THREE UNPLANNED SCRAMS OCCURRED DURING THIS PERIOD WHICH IS FAR LESS THAk IS TYPICAL FOR FACILITIES IN THIS PHASE OF STARTUP, FOLLOWING C0tPLETION OF THE PLANNED TESTING AT LESS THAN 5% POWER, THE REACTOR WAS SHUT DOWN IN EARLY NOVEMBER 1983 TO CORRECT MINOR PROBLEMS REVEALED BY LOW POWER TESTING AND TO ACCOPPLISH THE OPERATOR RECERTIFICATION PROGRAM, 1

2 MP&L SALP RATINGS Appraisal Period / 07/01/81 09/01/82 Current Functional Area 08/30/82 09/30/82 Trend Plant Operations / Preparation 3 3 Improving Radiological Controls 2 2 Same Maintenance /Preoperational Testing

3 n/r Surveillance
3 Improving Fire Protection
2 Same Emergency Preparedness 2 1 Same Security / Safeguards 2 2 Same Refueling
n/r n/r Licensing Activities 2 3 Improving Quality Assurance Program 2 3 Improving Preoperational Testing 3
n/r Comments:

Operations MP&L Completed Recertification Program MP&L Implemented Operational Enhancement Program Simulator Training for STA's end Shift Advisors . All Line Supervisors Replaced Recruitment of Experienced Me.iagers Excellent Low Power Test Performance IMPROVED PERFORMANCE Maintenance Mechanical Maintenance Supervisor Changed Electrical Maintenance Supervisor Changed Specialized Training Good Performance on RHR Pipe Crack Repairs Minimum Maintenance Work Over Last 6 Month No Recent Items of Violations EXPECTED MARKED IMPROVEMENT Surveillance All Procedures Reviewed / Revised Region II Team Inspections 2/21-24/84 4/9-13/84 3/28-30/84 IMPkOVED PERFORMANCE I

i 2 Quality Assurance Better than Average Programs More Direct Observations in Field Implemented

More Depth in Audits Observed EXPECT MARKED IMPROVEMENT A

i

      ~                      GRAND GULF                                      I LER DATA 9/82 - 10/83                                254 10/83                    25 11/83                     9 12/83                     7 1/84                     6 2/84                     4 3/84                     6 4/84                     7 5/84                     7 Total                    71    (Approximately 9/mo)

(8 months) I l i

                                                   -        8
                                                                                                                     ':                .: kNL
                                                                                                            . l ' ". h.?.;qfsj,jjk OPERATINs EXPERIENCE AT GRAND GULF-1 DURING LOW POWER LICENSE P (SEPTEMBER 1982 - JULY 1984)               .

GRAND Gulf LERS AND ROMPT REPORTABLE EVENT NOTIFICATIONS (10 CFR 50.72) REVIEWED AND COMPARED WITH'OTHER SIMILAR PLANTS , REsutTs: - RATE OF REPORTED EVENTS PERIOD NO. OF MONTP.S 2 PLANT. ,, 4 1 19* LASALLE-1 4/17/82 - 8/13/82 7/17/82 - 11/13/82 4 3 12' SusouEHANNA-1 16 10 ;. 20* GRAND GULF 9/1/82 - 12/31/83 2 9 4 1/1/84 - 2/29/84 3 7 6 3/1/84 - S/31/84 2 3 6/1/84 - 7/23/84

             *PR(OR TO LER RULE (10 CFR 50.73)
             ** DATA INCOMPLETE DUE TO DELAY BETWEEN EVENT AND REPORT DATE CONCLUSIONS:
              -      10 CFR 50.72 REPORTABLE EVENT FREQUENCY INIT LLY HIGH WHEN COMPA
              -      PERFORMANCE IMP, ROVING STEADILY; CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APPEAR TO BE EFFECT[VE
    .         -      EVENT FREQUENCY IN

NORMAL" RANGE DURING PAST DIO MONTHS bE ...#. ~.

                                                                                                                             ." ~

s.4 %

 ~^                                                                          - - -__ _             :1 . 1 7.'Y.                         '.' i

k VIOLATION SlR'ARY.-0_EJMTl_NG__E_A_QOJLS (10/1/83-PRESENT) 1 GRAND GULF 1 VS, EGl_0N__11__AyERA_GE__(BY__S.EVERIlY__ ley _EL_1 1 I Il III IV V GRAND GULF 1 0 0 0 11 7 EGION II 0 0 0 10 5 EGION 11 VS. NATIONAL AVERAGE (TOTAL VIOLATIONS) BROWNS FERRY 1 50 BROWNS FERRY 2 43 BROWNS FERRY 3 38 BRLNSWICK 1 5 BRUNSWICK 2 4

                  . CRYSTAL RIVER 3                         18 FARLEY 1                                   8 FARLEY 2                                 10 GRAND GULF 1                             18 HATCH 1                                  10 HATCH 2                                    8 MCGUIE 1                                 12        -

MCGUIE 2 10 NORTH ANNA 1 10 NORTH A W A 2 10 000 NEE 1 7 OCONEE 2 6 0COEE 3 5 ROBINSON 2 28 SEQUOYAH 1 21 SEQUOYAH 2 28 ST, LUCIE 1 3 ST, LUCIE 2 7 SIMER 1 7 SURRY 1 9 TURKEY POINT 3 26 TURKEY POINT 4 26 NATIONAL AVERAGE 10 _ . , , , _ m- , . _ ,

LICENSED OPERATOR QUALIFICATION RHR PIPE CRACK e 4

+ ~ .

      , _- =                           .   ,
                                                                                                                    .1 4              A y,'h                             ,-           _,

L. ,

4 v2 , 1

                                                               - RESIDUAL' HEAT' REMOVAL SYSTEM PIPE-CRACK-

= 4 JBACKGROUND w y s

                                                                            ' LICENSEE-ACTIONS s- .

: : A; NRC INSPECTION 9

A i F

       , s i

{_ l l ^: [.! ' ,'

7 LICENSED OPERATOR QUALIFICATION RECERTiFICATIONPROGRAM 1 1 1 4 SUBSEQUENT EXAMINATIONS

~*~

CURRENT STATUS 1 NRC EXAMINATION / INSPECTION EFFORT 4 PROJECTION E

L-RECERTIFICATION CHRONOLOGY

       -11/21/83 - 2/8/84     NRC ONSITE MONITORING OF RECERTIFICATION PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION 1/4 - 2/10/84         MP&L OPERATOR TRAINING EVALUATION COMMITTEE (0TEC) EVALUATION
                                          ~

2/14 24/84 NRC SIMULATOR AND ORAL EXAMINATIONS 3/12/84 NRC SIMULATOR EXAMINATIONS 6/5 - 7/84 NRC SIMULATOR AND ORAL EXAMINATIONS

LICENSED OPERATOR QUAllFICATIONS Tile NRC HAS EVALUATED THE TRAINING Ato QUALIFICATIONS OF TiiE OPERATING STAFF AT TiiE GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION EXTBASIVELY OVER THE PAST THREE YEARS. AS YOU ARE AWAE, THEE WEE INADEQUACIES IN BOTH TRAINING AND TRAINING DOCllTNTATION -- THIS LED TO MISSISSIPPI POER AND LIGHT (MP&L) INITIATING - AN EXTENSIVE RECERTIFICATION PROGRMi FOR ALL LICBASED OPERATORS, SHIFT (OPERATIONS) ADVISORS, AfD SHIFT TECHNICAL ADVISORS IN NOVEMBER 1983. TE DETAILS OF THE PROGRNi CONTEtE ERE PRESENTED TO EGION II ON NOVEPBER 11,1983, AND PROVIDED THE ETHODOLOGY BY WHICH ALL OF THE OPERATING STAFF PERSONNEL COULD BE VERIFIABLY UPGRADED AND RECERTIFIED. THIS SECIAL PROGRAM WAS C0f00CTED OVER A THREE IGUH FERIOD, ENDING IN FEBRUARY 1984. TWENTY-NINE (29) CAT 0IDATES BEGAN THE ECERTIFICATION PROGRAM. TWO SR0'S WERE WITHDRAWN FROM THE PROGRAM TO ASSIST IN -THE TRAINING DEPARTPBE EFFORTS. Of!E R0 WAS DENIED ECERTIFICATION BY THE lRILITY OPERATOR TRAINING EVALUATION C0FMITIEE. WITH THE C0FPLETION OF THE liTIlllY PROGRAM, THE NRC CONDUCTED ORAL AfD sit 1JLATOR EXAMINATIONS OF ALL OF THE 26 RECERTIFIED LICENSED OKRATORS. OF T E TWENTY-SIX (26) OPERATORS EXAMINED, ONE (1) SRO AND lHO (2) R0s DID NOT PASS THE SIFULATOR PORTION OF THE NRC EXAMINATIONS. THESE PERSONNEL WERE RB10VED FROM LICBiSED DlHIES BY THE UTILITY. TWEhiY-THREE (23) OPERATORS WERE, THEREFORE, AVAILABLE TO SUPPORT PLANT OPERATIONS -- THIS WAS A l SUFFICIBIT COMPLBENT TO ASCEND TO FULL POWER.

2 ON MARCH 12,1984, THE THREE (3) OPERATORS WHO FAILED THE FEBRUARY SIFULATOR EXNi WERE Rt:ltsitD, AGAIN WITH NEGATIVE RESULTS. BEY R&%INED RD0VED FROM LICB4 SED DIRIES #0' UNDERWBU ADDITIONAL TRAINING. BETWEEN JUNE 4 AND JUNE 8, THE NRC AGAIN ADMINISTERED EXAMINATIONS -- B0E ORAL AIS sit 0LATOR EXNiS WERE ADMIllISTERED TO THE EO (2) TRAINING SR0s, WHO BY THIS TIE HAD COMPLETED THE UTILITY ECERTIFICATION PROGRAM; ALSO, THE WO (2) R0s WHO - HAD FAILED THE FEBRUARY AfD F%RCH SItULATOR EXAMS WERE RETESTED, ALL FOUR PERSONNEL PASSED, AT EAT SAE TIE INITIAL LICEhSING EXAMINATIONS WERE GIVEN TO FOUR (4) EACTOR OPERATOR CANDIDATES. THREE PERSONI1EL PASSED ALL PHASES OF THE EXAMINATION AND AE CURRENTLY AWAITING LICENSE ISSUANCE. THE CURRBU QUALIFICATION STATUS WITH RESKCT TO LICBiSED OPERATORS IS AS FOLLOWS:

     ,1. THERE ARE TWENTY-SEVEN FUNCTIONAL LICBASES Ili USE AT GRAND GULF --

FIFTEEN (15) SR0s AND TWELVE (12) R0s.

2. THREE (3) INITIAL R0' EXAMINATIONS WEE SUCCESSFULLY C0FPLETED IN JUNE 1984,. AIO THE LItalSES AE PENDING.

UK)N ISSUANCE OF THE ABOVE LICB4SES, THE PLAIR WILL HAVE AVAILABLE THIRTY (30) LICB4SES -- FIFTEENJ15) SR0 AND FIFEB4 (15) R0. (MINIFU4 REQUIRED SHIFT C0FPLBiE!H IS 2 SROE & 2 R0s).

3 THE NRC'S IlNOLVEPBIT IN THE EVALUATION A!O UfGRADING 0F GRAND GULF'S TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION PROGRAMS HAS BEEN EXIB4SIVE, APPROXII'ATELY FORTY-SIX (4G) PAN-WEEKS OF INSKCTOR, NO EXAMINER TIE CAN BE DIRECTLY ATTRIBUTED TO-THE INSPECTION AND EVALUATION EFFORTS WHICH RESULTED lll THE RECERTIFICATION PROGRNi, A!0 lHEN VERIFIED ITS EFFECTIVENESS. THIS ADDITIONAL EFFORT ALLOWED US TO PERFORM A FUCH IURE DETAILED EVALUATION OF - THE TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION PROGRNi A!0 LB0S A HIGHER LEVEL OF CONFIDENCE IN OUR CONCLUSIONS CONCERNING THE RECERTIFICATION OF THE GRAf0 GULF OPERATORS. THIS EVOLUTION OF THE QUALIFICATION PROGRNi AT GRAND GULF HAS PROVIDED FOR AN INITIAL CADRE OF OVALIFIED LICENSED OPERATORS; HOWEVER, THERE IS THE NECESSITY TO PAI!UAIN AN ADEQUATE WORKFORCE, BOTH IN TERMS OF QUALITY Af0 QUANTITY. GRAND GULF'S PIPELINE TRAINING PROGRAM SHOULD PROVIDE FOR THESE NEEDS. INITIAL TRAINING FOR EITHER FIRST TIE R0'S OR INSTANT SR0'S WILL BE FORTY-NINE (49) WEB 3 IN LENGTH. TRAINING FOR UPGRADING R0 LICENSED OPERATORS TO SR0'S IS A TWENTY-ONE (21) WEEK PROGRAM. ALL PROGRAVG ARE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE TRAINiliG AND EXPERIBiCE, C0ffENSURATE FOR THE DESIRED LICB4SE. CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION, DIRECTED IN-PLAIR TRAINING ACTIVITIES, A!0 SitULATOR EXERCISES WILL ALL BE USED AS TRAINING EDIlfiS. IT IS ALSO THE PLAN OF fML TO EVENTUALLY EVOLVE lifTO A SIX (6) SHIFT SCHEDULE. THE LICB4 SED PERSONNEL IECESSARY TO SUPPORT THESE OPERATIONS IS TO BE ET THROUGH A DEDICATED TRAINING EFFORT, WITH AhTICIPATED LICBGING EXAMS FOR TKENTY (20) PERS0l4NEL (10 SR0 Ato 10 RO), TO BE GIVB4

4 SBil-ANNUALLY FROM JUNE 1985 lliRU DECBEER 1986. THE LICB4SEE HOPES TO HAVE ElGHTEEN (18) R0 AND THIRTY-ONE (31) SRO LICENSES, Mlfilf%LLY,114 US$ BY JANUARY 1987. l 1 FOURTEB4 (14) 0F THESE LICBASED PERS0f3!EL APE PLANNED TO BE UTILIZED AS IllSTRUCTORS WITHIN THE TRAINING DEPART W NT. THIS WILL REDUCE THE DEPBO B;CY - UPON CONTRACTOR RESOURCES Al0 SHOULD ALLOW A CONTINUING IMPROVBEiT IN THE lhTEGRATION OF OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE INTO THE TRAINING CURRICULA. I

l . I ON APRIL 30, 1984, LICENSEE EMPLOYEES, MAKING PRESCRIBED REGULAR PLANT TOURS OBSERVED LCAKAGE FROM A 3" CARBON STEEL LINE ATTACHEL TO THE "B" RHR LOOP. THIS PARTICULAR LINE WAS INTENDED FOP THE STEAM CONDENSING MODE OF RHR. THIS MODE OF ( OPERATION WAS NOT IN USE AND IS NOT ANTICIPATED IN THE FUTURE. THE AMOUNT OF LEAKAGE WAS SMALL AND NO RADI0 ACTIVITY WAS DETECTED. AT THAT TIME, THE SUS- - PECTED CAUSE OF THE PIPE CRACK WAS WATER HAMMER. THE LICENSEE INITIATED INSPEC-TION OF THE REMAINDER OF THE RHR SYS. TEM AND DID NOT FIND SIMILAR LEAKAGE OR PIPE CRACKS. l I f ONE CRACK WAS LOCATED NEAR THE ATTACHMENT WELD JOINING THE 3" DIAMETER CARBON 1 STCEL WELD-0-LET TO THE 18" ' DIAMETER CARBON STEEL RHR OUTLET LINE. THE CRACK WAS APPR0XIMATELY 4" LONG. l l THE OTHER CRACK WAS LOCATED IN THE INNER BEND OF THE FIRST 90" ELBOW 0F THIS 3"

DIAMETER LINE LOCATED APPROXIMATELY TWO FEET FROM THE AB0VE DESCRIBED AREA. THIS CRACK WAS APPR0XIMATELY 5" LONG. f l ON 5/2/84, ADDITIONAL LICENSEE INSPECTIONS OF THE REMAINDER OF THE RHR SYSTEM DID REVEAL SOME LOOSE CLAMPS AND SOME MOVEMENT OF 3 BASEPLATES IN THE RHR SYSTEM. k IN ADDITION, THE LICENSE PERFORMED A DETAILED WALKDOWN OF THE REMAINING ECCS SYSTEMS TO ENSURE SIMILAR CONDITIONS DID NOT EXIST IN THE OTHER SYSTEMS. ON MAY 3, 1984, THE LICENSEE REMOVED THE CRACKED PIPING AND SENT IT TO MIDDLE SOUTH SERVICES FOR METALLURGICAL EVALUATION.

2 UPON DESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION, ONE OF THE TWO WELDS (THE WELD-0-LET) WAS FOUND TO { HAVE A SMALL DEFECT LOCATED AT AN ABRUPT WELD DISCONTINUITY FORMED DURING THE WELDING PROCESS. THE OTHER PIPE THAT WAS CRACKED SHOWED NO SUCH INTERNAL DEFECT. IN BOTH CASES, THE PRIMARY FAILURE MECHANISM WAS IDENTIFIED AS HIGH-CYCLE, LOW-STRESS FATIGUE AND NOT-AS A RESULT OF AN INADEQUATE WELD. THE LICENSEE INSTALLED A WELDED CAP.AT THE PIPE END SINCE THE PIPING WAS DETER-MINED NOT TO BE REQUIRED. PIPE SUPPORT AND PIPING DESIGN RECORDS WERE CHECKED.

 ,       THE LICENSEE AND THE ARCHITECT ENGINEER (BECHTEL) VERIFIED THAT THE PIPING             l ANALYSIS FOR THE DAMAGED PIPE WAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH DESIGN REQUIREMENTS AND THE STRESS ANALYSIS REPORT CONFIRMED THIS. DESIGN INSTRUCTIONS WERE ISSUED AND THE PIPE SUPPORTS WERE REPAIRED, AND THE BOLTS RE-TORQUED TO ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS.

TESTING PERFORMED BY THE LICENSEE IN ORDER TO TRY TO DUPLICATE THE OPERATING CONDITIONS AT THE TIME OF THE EVENT REVEALED NOTICEABLE VISIBLE AND AUDIBLE VIBRATION OF BOTH A AND B LOOP PIPING DURING PUMP STARTS. DURING OPERATION OF RHR "A" PUMP WITH SYSTEM THROTTLING, VIBRATION WAS OBSERVED. SUBSEQUENT INSPEC-TION REVEALED THAT CONCRETE EXPANSION ANCHORS FOR A PIPE SUPPORT ON LOOP A HAD PULLED OUT AGAIN. THE SUPPORT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY REDESIGNED AND MODIFIED. THE LICENSEE AGREED TO MONITOR VIBRATION OF A & B RHR PIPING, TO HAVE FLUID l MECHANICS DESIGN ENGINEERS REVIEW THE SYSTEM AND PERFORM FURTHER INSPECTION ON 1 RHR AND ECCS PIPING AND PIPE SUPPORTS. NO FURTHER PROBLEMS WERE IDENTIFIED. 1 I . - -

3 - IN CONCLUSION -THE PIPING WAS BEING OPERATED IN THE SHUTDOWN COOLING MODE WITH ESSENTIALLY NO RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL REQUIREMENTS. THUS, THE SHUTDOWN COOLING FLOW WAS SEVERELY THROTTLED. TESTS CONDUCTED BY THE LICENSEE DUPLICATING THIS MODE OF OPERATION CONFIRMED THE CAUSE OF THE FAILURE TO BE VIBRATION RESULTING FROM SEVERE THROTTLING OF THE SYSTEM. THE RHR PROBLEM HAS BEEN RESOLVED IN THAT , IDENTIFICATION OF THE CAUSE HAS ALLOWED IMPLEMENTATION OF MEANS TO AVOID THE VIBRATION THROUGH CHANGES IN OPERATING PROCEDURES, ADDITION OF SUPPORTS, AND OPERATOR TRAINING. . THE NRC CLOSELY MONITORED THE LICENSEE'S INVESTIGATION AND RESOLUTION OF THIS MATTER. IN ADDITION TO THE TWO RESIDENT INSPECTORS, REGION II DISPATCHED THREE SPECIALIST INSPECTORS TO THE SITE IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH A CHRONOLOGY OF SIGNIFI-CANT EVENTS AND TO EVALUATE THE LICENSEE'S PERFORMANCE AND CORRECTIVE ACTION. INSPECTION REPORT 50-416/84-17 DOCUMENTED THE RESULTS OF THIS INSPECTION. THE SPECIALIST INSPECTORS IhCLUDED A METALLURGICAL ENGINEER, A MECHANICAL DESIGN ENGINEER AND A TEST ENGINEER. THE INSPECTORS REVIEWED REPAIR ACTIVITIES, WHICH INCLUDED ACTUAL WORK OBSERVATION AND RECORD REVIEW 0F THE ONG0ING REPAIR , 1 ACTIVITIES AS WELL AS ORIGINAL WELD FABRICATION RECORDS TO ASSURE ASME CODE REQUIREMENTS WERE MET. ULTRASONIC INSPECTIONS OF WELDS IN HIGH STRESS LOCATIONS IN THE VICINITY OF THE CRACKED LINE WERE REVIEWED TO DETERMINE WHETHER VIBRATION HAD COMPROMISED WELD INTEGRITY. THE INSPECTORS PERFORMED AN INSPECTION OF RESTRAINTS AND HANGERS SELECTED AT RAND 0M IN RHR LOOPS "B" AND "C" TO CHECK FOR POSSIBLE DAMAGE. IN ADDITION, THE INSPECTORS REVIEWED AVAILABLE DATA TO VERIFY THE. ADEQUACY OF THE ORIGINAL DESIGN AND THE DESIGN ADEQUACY OF THE REPAIRS TO THE DAMAGED PIPE SUPPORTS.

4 AS PART OF THE NRC'S REVIEW OF PLANT CONDITIONS, THE INSPECTORS REVIEWED THE AVAILABLE THERMAL EXPANSION TEST _RESULTS AND BASELINE VIBRATION DATA FOR THE RHR SYSTEM.- WE CONCLUDE THAT THE LICENSEE'S INVESTIGATION OF THIS MATTER WAS COM-FREHENSIVE AND THAT THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS THAT WERE TAKEN ARE APPROPRIATE. i

-a#

e 4 e e

1 er; '

  'S,_

STATLE OF GPAND GULF RADIATION Pf0TECTION PROGP#1

                   .HP/CHEMISTRYORGANIZATION
                   .EXPOSURECONTROLPROGRAMS
                   . Roo WASTE
                   . VIOLATIONS CONCERNS i
                                                      .                                                                                 . j 1

a l l l l l 1

                                                                                                                        =
                                      - , , ,  ,,   -     - . . - + . . . - - - -. , ,-,., ,      -,..--,-.-...-m., , ,         , - - ,

N

                                                                  .M t^

STATUS OF PROGRAM q f g ) Qg HP/ Chemistry Organization and Qualification The department as structured pf meets regulatory requirements. The qualifications of the Chemistry / Radiation Control Superintendent and other HP and chemistry personnel meet Tech Spec requirements that the technicians in responsible positions and their supervisors, except the Chemi stry/ Radiation Control Superintendent, meet ANSI 18.1-1971 qualification criteria. The Chemistry / Radiation Control Superintendent, meets the qualification requirements of Reg. Guide 1.8 for Radiation Protection Manager Hin21H4mt* = 3emmac, 23 sa w 7). Since most of the Chemistry / Radiation Control Superintendent's experience is at PWRs, he ,is undergoing BWR system training. The current HP organization has a total of 32 HP technicians, of which 17 are a ANSI qualified. There are also 7 staff health physicists, of which 5 are ANSI . qualified. The current chemistry organization has 12 technicians, of which 3 are ANSI qualified technicians, a lab supervisor and a chemist. The licensee has plans to reorganize the Chemistry and Radiation Control organization and is current)y recruiting additional personnel. The Grand Gulf - staffing levels appear reasonable when compared with those at operating , multi-unit BWR sitet. i l i

~ .

      . n 2

External and Internal Exposure Control Programs The external and exposure control programs including the RWP, external dosimetry, MPC-br system, whole body counting, surveys posting and instrumentation meet regulatory requirements and good health physics practice. ALARA personnel have been involved in plant design modifications and will be involved in RWP review. Management has an established policy to implement the program. The licensee has posted plant areas with radiation precaution signs to assist in worker exposure control . The licensee identified areas which would probably beccme high radiation areas after plant operation and has established appropriate control devices for these areas (e.g. lockable gates). Sufficient equipment, postings and procedures were in place to control the egress of personnel and release of equipment from the designated controlled areas. Inspections have verified that portable and area monitoring instrumentation have been in calibration. Radwaste The licensee is modifying the liquid radwaste solidification system. The originally installed system did not function satisfactorily. Currently a vendor _ is dewatering resins onsite. The licensee has contracted with a vendor to perform solidification when it becomes necessary.

3 Environmental protection The purpose of the licensee's of fsite environmental. monitoring program is to detect indicators of any adverse environmental ef fect. Our inspections of the MP&L environmental program have identified no problems of licensee compliance with technical specifications or other regulatory requirements. The licensee's program consists of analysis of offsite air samples, samples of surface, ground and potable water, sediment from shorelines, milk, fish and food products grown in the area. In addition, the licensee has placed thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) at 40 offsite locations to measure direct radiation. The NRC Direct Radiation Measurement System using TL0s has been implemented. Baseline data has been collected using NRC TL0s to establish preoperational radiation back' ground levels. The NRC has established a contract with the State of Mississippi to perform radiological environmental monitoring around the site. The contract . has been operational for almost two years. These environmental results have identified no problems with the MP&L environmental program. Radiological Measurements l, Inspection of the MP&L radiological measurement program verified the licensee's capability to accurately measure and monitor radioactive samples. We provided simulated reactor coolant, liquid and gaseous effluents, and radiodine samples for analysis for a variety of radioisotopes to assure the licensee could accurately measure radioactive material in different media. MP&L provided e -

                                                                           -.y,     .   ---- -. ,--r
                                              -e -,.s,     , ,-----,4

n , n. s. V

                   -g 4-acceptable; analysis results for all samples.                                                  Review of the quality ' assurance program for_ radiological measurements, showed MP&L had 'an acceptable program that -

i. .

                        'was consitent with NRC criteria            .

N t-S 9 L

        ,t .-
                                                                                                                                                                                          ~

a e , i . [. s e i I' ,. , _ --

E -E ' 3 l' d ( % GRAND GULF - SECURITY

1. All physical security inspection procedures were completed in FY83. The:

reduced physical security inspection program is 67*, complete for FY84,

2. There are no issues or special issues currently pending in the security area.

3. There are no special security program provisions.

4. Grand Gulf's Guard Training and Qualification program is fully implemented and is operating satisfactorily.

5. All equipment on the current BWR " generic list" is presently vital.

6. The following enforcement actions. have taken ' place since June 1982 (granting of low power license):

a. Failure to comply with containment logging procedures (SL V) (82-64).

b. Failure to follow security event reporting procedures (SL IV) (82-74).

c. Failure to follow procedures for testing vital area alarms (SL IV) (82-74).

d. Failure to provide positive access control to a vital area (SL IV)

(82-74).

e. Failure to control access to a vital area (SL III, $20,000 civil penalty) (83-17). g6CiM T F6 M N P: N G of stf/4 M 6 6vrh 4 h 0 hCmou MK6 Failuretomaintainpositivecontrolofanescortedemployee(SLIV) C h! Gnih t &C. CCM $6

f. )

(83-18). Failure to positively control a licensee-designated vehicle (SL V) (84-14).

h. Failure to complete Visitor / Escort Control Form (SL V) (84-14).

7. There have been ten security inspections (seven routine and three special) since June 1982.

8. Grand Gulf received a Category 2 in security on the last SAlp. Their performance continues at that same level, or slightly better. (Gs cc,gsS)\

9, 6v OrRD Q)RC6C - C A$ TYh- 6 6 6t$ lTY CF j f. c.g c c q M g

                'is 9+ L Ent. M 4 G L L AC T A (                           C E c.JpTy g +. pr 9gg g p Sca3

(;s E / 6W CwiC-T.

E DDEKY PEPMEDESS INSPECTim PIOGRAM ELDMS I'. BGEKYlEETim a OASSIFICATim

2. PIDETIVE /CTIm IECISim !%KI!E

3. IUTIFICATim a CGfift!CATIG6

4. OMNGES TO TE EP P!OGR#1

5. SHIFT STNFIE & AUGENTATIm ,

6. TRAINIE 7.' DOSE ASSESSENT ;

1

8. PO5T-ACCIIENT PEASlEENNTS/ IETRffMTATim 9.PlBLIC150P!0 GRAM 10'.EPPIOGRAMitDI15

11. DENBEY IDDER Pf0TECTIM ,

l e i 4 l

                                                               . - - _ - - - _ - .[_ _ - _ . - - - - , ' _ - _ _ _ _% _ - - _

        $              O' N                                                 e l

l f APPRAISAL PIGRAM

,                                                        IEVIEW ELEENTS I.EPAMMISTRATIM

2. EBGEM,Y OIEAMlZATION

3. T W N M PROGRAM 4.' FACIUTIES I ERJIPENT 5.' PR00RES 7' IEVIBf / /IBIT PIOGRM

8. RK TEUGH EVAURTIE

4

 $                       W DSCISE EVAURTIGI BBENTS I.' CGfm0L ROTI

2. TEDfilt L SlPPORT ENH 3.' 000ENCY TERATIGE FACILITY

4. GBATIGEL SLPP(RT END

5. CDFGMTE 07tWO ENE

6. GTSITE MITGtIE 7',' RELIC IEPfRTIGi ( ENC )

8'.' EIC4L StPPORT f

PADI0 LOGICAL PPO'IECTION STAFFING OBEPBWP'S GPAND GtF NrflNAL AW.ANIT PPDESSIONAL (INCL.' PPD '12 14 TE0iNICIANS,HP

                                                  }gg                25 TECHNICIANS,00',

g{g 17 'h r e

1, . - . . . . . . _ . _ . ,.. t s

     ,    'b                                                                                                             e a

35EX23870 DRAFT NO. 1 J CW. ' * , . 06/06/84

F w s .

J COMMISSION BRIEFING GRAND GULF, UNIT 1 , 7 STATUS REPORT I I c CONSIDERATION OF FULL 1 POWER LICENSE A

       <N I
       +

1. l 4 ,

e

ik 2 ~, 1 BRIEFING OUTLINE Licensee / Plant Background Major Milestones Since Low Power Licensing

                 -*       Experience Report Region II
                ,'        Current Issues Delaval Diesel Generator Licensed Operator Recertification Technical Specifications                                           .
                             " Operating Staff Experience Non-Lic.ensed Personnel Training 4

Other Issues of Interest Recent Plant Management Changes Standby Service Water Basin TMI Action Items h' / b j'f kw 5% Power License Conditions j t - ( - Ii' u _' * '~ * ._. ., .

                                                  ._-.l__.1._

_ _ . - . _[____ - . _ _

c' - gu f i -~

    . g;_$                                                                                  :

3 LICENSEE / PLANT BACKGROUND s Licensee: Mississippi Power & Light Company (Project Manager) Middle South Energy, Inc. South Mississippi Electric Power Association Plant:

                        < Location:                    Port Gibson, Mississippi Type / Vendor:              BWR/GE AE/ Construction:           Bechtel Power Level:                 1250 MWE Low Power License Issued: June 12, 1982 First U.S. BWR/6 Mark III bh,EM e
                    .f-
    $ g   $g                               .

                 .-... a          .    .a .       . . _

_3 4

                                       ' MAJOR MILESTONES ~SINCE LOW POWER LICENSING                                       ' i g

r' ' ,

            '6/16/82                                                    Low Power Operating License Issued .

(Two Phased Startup)

            *7/1/82                                                   ' Commenced Fuel Loading M
            '8/8/82 Completed Fuel Loading f
            '8/18/82                                                    Initial     Criticality (Zoro Power
     -j Physics Testing - 4 hrs. Duration)
            '9/16/82 - (10/15/82;                                      Non-Nuclear Heat Up (Discovery of -

Insufficient Drywell Cooling)

           '9/27/82         ',10/8/82',

Special Team Inspection on

Surveillance Test Procedures

           *10/14/82                                                   Enforcement Conference Concerning                    L
                                                                     ' Surveillance Procedures, T.S.         and Training on T.S. (Result of 9/27/82                 -
                                                                       - 10/8/82 Special Team Inspection) i      -

? L

                                                                                  ,                  ,i          4   .
          .                          +                                    , ,             ,

F f . p '; . 5 I L *10/20/82- Confirmation of Action- Letter (C0A) on Surv'et11ance Procedures 'a n'd l Technical Specifications (Result of 10/14/84 Enforcement Conference)

             *10/25/82 - 9/25/83             Extended Maintenance Outage
                                             ' Installation of Additional Drywell Cooiing
                                            ' Resolution of Deficiencies in Surveillance Procedures and Technical Specifications (C0A --

10/20/82)

                                            ' Modifications to Plant Systems Originally Scheduled for First-Refueling Outages
                                            ' Recovery From Div. I Standby Diesel Generator _ Fire Resulting From Broken Fuel Line (9/4/83)          .

4

            *1/17/33                        Enforcement       Conference  Regarding Multiple Examples of Failure to Follow Procedure i

G O 6 4

               .                 e

a .. 6

                      '*3/11/83~                          Operational = Enhancement      Program of1/17/83 l                                 (Result                   Enforceinent Conference.)

L B

                        *5/11/83                          Management Meeting to Discuss T.S.

Changes Required For Recriticality i

                       *7/13/83                           Civil Penalty for Security Violation
                       *8/12/83                          . Management     Meeting  to    Discuss      ,

Licensee's Action on COA - 10/20/82

                       *8/15/ -19/83                                                                                  '

8/30/84 - 9/1/83 NRC Operational Readiness In'spection of Grand Gulf Unit 1

                       *9/23/83                           Confirmation of Concurrence (COC) for Recriticality (Conditional Items of   C0C    Discussed   in   9/23/83 l

Management Meeting with Licensee.)

                       *9/25/83                           Recriticality                                             .
    +                  *11/8/83                           Complete Testing at Less Than 5%

Power K 1 l

                                                 -7
                    !*12/5/83'                         COA on Recertification of Operating Staff '(Result of 10/3i/83 - 11/4/83'
                                                    - Special Team Inspection and 11/11 &

11/18/83 Management Meetings.)

                     *12/8/83                          Commission Briefing on Grand . Gulf Status.
                     *12/21/83               ,

Civil Penalty for Repeat Procedure Violations

                     *11/21/83    .2/10/84            Recertification      Program    Imple-mentated/0TEC Review Performed (NRC Review / Observation    of    Program Implementation.)

_a

                  ~*2/13 - 24/84 & 3/12/84            NRC Operator Recertification Exams (23 of 26 Passed. COA (s) of 2/79 3/23/84   Confirm     Removal  of 3 s                    .            .

Failures From Licensed Duty.)

*2/21 ,24/84' Special Team Inspection Comparing -

Technical Specifications to Installed Hardware (T.S. Errors Found in 4 Areas, Several Unresolved y T.S. Questions.)

       -~          '

3 , ;. __u. . 8 2/29/84. Commission Briefing on Status

~'

3/18/84 Submittal of T.S. Review Program by MP&L 3/28 - 30/84 Special Team Inspection to Observe the Grand Gulf T.S. Review Program. 3/20/84 , Commission Briefing on T.S. Problems 4/18/84 Order - Required Selected Changes to T.S. Prior to Restart. (Limits Operating to Less than 5% Pending Completion of T.S. and TDI Diesel Review.) i 4/19 - 21/84 Discovery / Correction of Crywell Personnel Air. Lock (s) Seismic Qualification (Both Containment Air n Lock (s) Received Seismic Modifi-cations the Week of 4/8/84. Drywell Mods Waived by NPE. Plant Management Discovery this Fallacy on 4/19/84 - Delayed Plant Restart.)

o -

                         ~ . . a. _     'a . z. _ . . . _.

I[

   ,w 9
                 '4/22/84                                           Restart ( $5% Power Operation; Reperforinance of Low Power Testing on Modified Systems and Rejuvenate S/U Sources.)
                 *5/2/84                                            Unit Shutdown;     (Both trains of containment spray declared In-Op 3

resulting from 4/30/84 "B" RHR Pipe Crack Event & "A" RHR Pipe Hanger Movement - RII Specialists Onsite.)

                 '5/6/84                                            RESTART (Continue Low Power Opera-tion;   4/30 Pipe Crack due to Vibration    Resulting from Excess-Throttling of RHR HX Flox - Opera-ting Procedures Modified to Limit t

Throttling).

                 *5/8/84                                            UNIT Shutdown; (Recurrence of "A" RHR Pipe Hanger Movement Resulting From "B" RHR Pump Starting Torque on Common Suction Piping     -

Hanger Redesigned) ^.-

                 *5/11/84                                           RESTART     (Continue  Low     Power

!"~ Operation) L i e i . . ,e . . .

                      ~                   '                                 ~    ~  '

(S ~~' _ , , . _m, m 3! 10

   -                 *5/22/84-                                         ORDER   -

Required ' Tear Down of 1,

                                                                     ' Division 'I1 Diesel; Incorporated Gas s

Power Turbines into T.S. (Low Power - , OperatioriContinues.)

                     '5/24/84                                          Commission Meeting on GOC-17 and 5/22/84 order; (3 to l' Vote Not to
                                                                                                     ~

S/D Grand Gulf).

                        ~
                     '6/1/84                                           Commission Meeting on GOC-17 &

Legality. of 5/22/84 Order; (3 to 2 Vote Not to S/0). 86/1/84 Unit Shutdown - Concerns on 30 Day Water Supply to SSW System - Licensee Identified and S/0 Plant.

                    '6/4/84                                            NRC & Consultants Observe Div. I Diesel Inspection by Licensee
                    '6/4 - 8/84                                        Requal Simulator and Oral Examina-tion of 4 License Operators...All 4            -

Pass (2 Were Members of the Recertification Training staff, the Other 2 were Failures from the Original 26 that were Re-examined on 2/84 and 3/84.)

                                                                                                              ,         1

q. , d

                  ,         e       e

m .-

     /
                                      +t
           .                                                        11                                                    .
                      *6/13/84 - 7/8/84                                    Maintenance Outage in Progress.While SSW System _ Deficiency -is Being Resolved-Plant S/D.               '

(Items Scheduled During Outage,

  .a Include Drywell Bypass Leakage Test, 4-                      +

Repair of CR0 Leaky Seals, Steam Tunnel Cooling Modifications and Selected Surveillances.)

                      *6/25/ ,7/6/84 PRESENTLY                                           NRC Review of- Licensee's Evaluation
                                              'I                           of Any Further Interaction Between1 Units 1 & 2, in Light of SSW Concern
                                                                           - (On Site Inspection.)
                                ~
                    ~* FUTURE PLANS OF RII                                 (1) Operational Assessment of Plant' and Staff Performance Prior to-Exceeding 50% Power (2) Operational Assessment of Plant and Staff Performance Sub-                   :

! sequent to Warranty Run, V L i i l' t t

                                                                       .+.         .    .,   .                    .

SN t I } , 12 f J

               '\ '     ,

t 'i

                   \
            \

q EXPERIENCE REPORT REGION II .

                                                  's  .

4 s 5 . E i i i e ( t i k i

 % ,1                                                   -

13 PLANT ACTIVITIES: JUNE 1982 - PRESENT (M . Octooer 1982 - September 1983 l ' - Confirmation Action Letter Dated October 20, 1982 Review and Rewrite of Surveillance Procedures Technical Specification Change Requests i l

         ' March 1983 i

i - Operations Enhancement Program j 4 September-1983 Diesel-Generator Fire Operational Readiness Inspection 1

               -Completion of Technical Specification Changes

[ Required for Restart September 25, 1983 - November 8, 1983 Recriticality and Complete Low Power Testing November 1983 - February 1984 Ce. s*J Recertification of Operators

14 February - July 1984 Review of Technical Specifications 1 April 22 - June 1, 1984 Resume Low Power Operation 1 1 1

15 NRC has identified numerous problem areas at Grand Gulf. MP&L has taken significant actionsc which are responsive to correct 1on of areas of concerns that were identified in the SALP report. Some of the actions taken are:

1. Completed a major operator recertification program and 23 of 26 licensed j operators successfully passed the subsequent NRC requalification examina-I' tion. Four more subsequently passed NRC exams.

2. Implemented an extensive Operational Enhancement Program, which among many other items required sensitization o'f operators to meticulously comply with regulatory requirements, including procedures.

3. Conducted system and simulator training of Shift Advisors and Shift Technical Advisors. These advisors underwent written examination and review of their performance and experience by the plant's Operator Training Evaluation Board.

, 4. Completed a comprehensive review of Technical Specifications with identi-fication and resolution of all known discrepancies. All required changes have been implemented in the Technical Specifications to be issued with the full power license.

5. MP&L has made Management personnel changes involved replacements of both the Plant Manager and the Assistant Plant Manager for Operations, with individuals having previous nuclear commercial operating experience. The plant organization has been restructured to incorporate three Assistant Plant Managers for better management control. Since issuance of the low

f 3 16 power license the entire management chain, from company president down to

      ,        operations supervisor has been changed.

Assessment Of Operating Staff Performance Testing at less than 5*' power was commenced September 25, 1983, and completed on

        -November 8. The testing progressed relatively smoothly, with only three reactor scrams occurring.      Following recertification of all operators and Order correcting priority TS problems, Plant restarted April 22, 1984, for further

) testing and operated to June 1, 1984. Region II assesses the overall performance of the operations staff and plant during the low power operations as good. Testing progressed at a deliberate pace and the operating staff was evaluated to be sensitive to plant conditions, l procedural requirements, and Technical Specifications. Licensee has taken I T conservative action to shutdown plant in response to problems. 1

t~ m 17 l t t CURRENT ISSUES b e l-t I r k 9 L .

?.

11; TRANSAMERICA DELAVAL

    .                                      DIESEL GENERATOR Crankshaft Failure - Shoreham August 22, 1983 Shoreham Straight 8 vs. Grand Gulf V-16 Region IV QA Investigation of Vendor-Shoreham Decision - GDC'17 TDI Dwner's Group Established, MP&L one of Leaders
?

Both Diesels Disassembled for Inspection and Piston Replacement December 1983 - January 1984 Installation of Gas Turbines Further Detailed Inspection of Division One Diesel Generator Ordered May 22, 1984

              . NRC and Consultants Witnessed Work                                                -I No Significant Problems Identified Turbo Changes Inspected on Division II Generator
           ^ Detailed Inspection of Division II Will Be Done at First Refueling

  .-                4 s
                                                                                                                                                                                            -_ ;t 19                                                                                
                                                ~ Grand Gulf TDI Diesels are' Fully Operab1'e 2

+ , . .. .

                                                 -Additional' Technical                       Specification . Requirements                For - Power Supply-
                                                  ' Reliability.

f' 8 g... (7 s; . , , s

w. ;

.' ** ,\

t -. ( y-F F & t , i

                               .)._,
                                                                   'n r

E t' 1 s,* e-.

                       .                                                                        ~

u i

20

                                       " QUALIFICATION /RECERTIFICATION PROGRAM 10/81                                   Initial NRC Cold License Exams 5/82 - 9/83                            Subsequent NRC Licensing Exams
                 -2/83        .                          RII Training ~ Assessment Inspection 7/83                                   NRC Requalification Exams 8/83 - 9/83                            RII     Operational  Readiness Assessment Inspection 9/30/84                               MP&L Commitment to Verify Validity of Previous Applications
          ,       10/12/83                              NRC/MP&L Management Meeting on Results of Application Reviews
    '                                                                                                  ~
                .10/31 - 11/4/83                        Second RII Training Assessment Inspection 11/11 - 11/18/83                      NRC/MP&L Management Meeting on Recerti-fication Program

L 21 11/21 - 11/23/83 NRC Onsite Monitoring of Recertification Program Implementation

12/5/83 Confirmation of Action Letter Requiring Recertification 2/84 MP&L Completes Recertification Examina-tions 4

2/13 - 24/84 & NRC Examines Al'1 Operators, 23 of 26 3/12/84 Pass, COA. Letters of 2/29 and 3/23 Confirm Removal of 3 Failed Operators From Licensed Duties 6/4 - 8/84 NRC Examines and Passes Four Additional Operators - 2 of 3 Who Previously Failed, 2 From Training Staff Just Recertified by MP&L a-w * ,._ yy - ,- -- y ,-----av ----- -- --

22 LICENSED OPERATOR RECERTIFICATION PROGRAM Recertification of Operators Required In Response To Region II Inspection-Findings. Program Accomplished November 1983 - March 1984 Program Review by AP&L, Duke Power, and General Electric All Licensed Operators (SRO & RO) vore Recertified and Examined by Licensee Subsequent Examination of All Operators by NRC Currently Grand Gulf has 27 Licensed Operators (15 SRO,12 RO) Five Shift Rotation Staff has Verified Adequate Knowledge of Licensed Operators

     -Technical Specifications                  .

Technical Specifications Issued June 32, 1982 With Operating License 1 Grand Gulf is First BWR-6 with Mark III Containment to be Licensed by NRC

i

                                                                                          }ee & .

wgAW5 ;j 23 Shortly after training, Region II inspections reveal TS discrepancies wg 7

 .           as-built plant.      October.20, 1982 Confirmation of Action (C0A) letter' requires TS review by appropriate change requests. By letters.of August 29, 1983, September 7,1983, September 13, 1983, and September 22, 1983, MP&L stated that their actions were complete.       Following an NRC Operational Readiness Inspection the plant was restarted to less than 5% power on September 25, 1983.

Additional TS discrepancies continued to be found by the licensee and the NRC. A' special NRC inspection on Februa'ry 21-24, 1984, in ten TS areas

            . found TS errors in 4 areas on several unresolved TS questions.

On March 18, 1984, MP&L committed to a complete review of the TS to identify all discrepancies. MP&L now states that the earlier review of October 20, 1982 until September 22, 1983 emphasized surveillance and did not review the entire TS. MP&L identified over 400 " Problem" areas with TS. These have been reviewed

         - by the NRC staff and changes to the TS were found to be appropriate in over 200. All appropriate changes to the TS have been requested by MP&L.
   ,         Changes will be issued with the full power license.

a b

                                .                                                            g .

24 OPERATING STAFF EXPERIENCE BWR Experienced Advisors (Consultants) Each Shift Until 100% Power ^ Advisors Were Certified on Grand Gulf a Experienced Advisors to Operations Superintendent Experienced Advisor to Vice President - Nuclear Staff Observed Advisor Training and Examinations s Advisors are Adequately Trained e 1 e

             ,,.oy . , , . . -            ----tvv---^       P"       ' ' " '

z 25 NON-LICENSED PERSONNEL TRAINING On January 30, 1984, MP&L made a presentation to Region II management on their review of the status of non-licensed personnel training at Grand Gulf. The conclusions were documented by memo of February 11, 1983.

    , Subsequently, Region II discovered further examples in which maintenance personnel did not receive and/or document all training required by plant procedures.                                                                  '

MP&L has made personnel changes in the maintenance supervisors. MP&L is conducting a comprehensive review of all past training to identify and correct any deficiencies. OI was asked by Region II to investigate this matter. A final report has yet to be issued, but Regional Management has been / A on the findings. Following review of the OI report, a determination will be made on any enforcement action. g . . . . . .. .

j H"4 26 OTHER ISSUES OF INTEREST 1 1 1

27 RECENT PLANT MANAGEMENT CHANGES t

       , Revised Plant Organization - Three Assistant Plant Managers Former Plant Manager Reassigned as Executive Advisor to Senior Vice President Assistant Plant Manager - Operations Reassigned as Plant Manager Training Staff Strengthened Hired New Training Superintendent with Previous Industry Experience

] Hired Assistant Plant Manager - Operations and Technical Assistant with Previous BWR Licensed Experience Experienced Shift Superintendent Reassigned as Operations Superintendent Corpor.ite Reorganization T _ _, _ -. - - . - ~ . .

n o 28 STANDBY SERVICE WATER BASIN. 4 Early 1982 Preop testing discovered standby service water (SSW) flow capacity too low. Interim fix until first refueling was to administratively raise the design value for minimum suction head yater level in Basin from 82' elevation to 107'. Larger pump to be installed at first refueling. June 1,1984, plant was shutdown when licensee became aware of oversite in previcus analysis. A -single failure of either SSW pump would leave remaining operable basin with less than 30 day water supply down to 107' . If both pumps are not operable there is no way to transfer water basin to using installed equipment. _ July parsive 1 June - transfer device installed, tested, Basins become operable, restart plant for 5% power operation. i I O

.: .x s r

  .                ' Document Name:-                  .

35EX-3870

                  - Requestor's ID:
                                  ~
                  ' JANET-Author's Name:

C. JULIAN . Document Comments: COP 94ISSION BRIEFING PAPER-

                                                  \
  ' O'                                  g L

a e Y x O'

                                                 -           -      .     .      . .     .. . . .          - .   - = . . . - . -   .           .       -
                          -}>  \           --*M8 ^) 4r3   N Jc'..

v: . : c, i35EX.'3870 DRAFT NO. 2 JCW_ . - 7/13/84 hat i 3

                             .'                                                COMMISSION BRIEFING GRAND GULF,. UNIT 1
                                                                                  -STATUS REPORT t

CONSIDERATION OF FULL-4. T ss POWER LICENSE - -+ r 5 t 5 m. 1 9 .I

2 BRIEFING OUTLINE Licensee / Plant Background Major Milestones Since Low Power Licensing Experience Report Region II Current'Iss'ues Delaval Diesel Generator Licensed Operator Recertification Technical Specifications

                  .0perating Staff Experience Non-Licensed Personnel Training Other Issues of Interest Recent Plant Management Changes Standby Service Water Basin TMI Action Items 5% Power License Conditions                .

     % 6 3

LICENSEE / PLANT BACKGROUND Licensee: ,

                         . Mississippi Power & Light Company (Project Manager)                   .

Middle South Energy, Inc. ' South Mississippi Electric Power Association Plant: Location: Port Gibson, Mississippi Type / Vendor: BWR/GE AE/ Construction: Bechtel - Power Level: 1250 MWE-

             - Low Power License Issued: , June 12, 1982 First U.S. BWR/6 Mark III Containment F

i e

t 4 MAJOR MILESTONES SINCE LOW POWER LICENSING

              '6/16/82                                     Low Power Operating License Issued (Two Phased Startup) s
             *7/1/82                                       Commenced Fuel Loading t
             '8/8/82                                       Completed Fuel Loading
             '8/18/82                                      Initial   Criticality      (Zero             Power Physics Testing - 4 hrs. Duration)
             '9/16/82 - 10/15/82                           Non-Nuclear ' Heat Up (Discovery of Insufficient Drywell Cooling)
             '9/27/82 - 10/8/82                            Special    Team    Inspection                  on Surveillance Test Procedures
             *10/14/82                                     Enforcement Conference Concerning Surveillance Procedures,       T.S.             and Training on T.S. (Result of 9/27/82                              ,
                                                           - 10/8/82 Special Team Inspection)                                 '

!

8
m s V ano i.

5

               *10/20/82-                                  Confirmation of Action Letter (COA) on- Surveillance     Procedures             and Technical Specifications (Result- of 10/14/82 Enforcement Conference)
               *10/25/82 - (9/25/83)                       Extended Maintenance Outage

Installation of Additional Drywell Cooling

             .                                             " Resolution of Deficiencies in Surveillance Procedures and Technical Specifications (COA -

10/20/82)

Modifications to Plant Systems Originally Scheduled for First Refueling Outages
Recovery From Div. I Standby Diesel Generator Fire Resulting From Broken Fuel Line (9/4/83)

l

               *1/17/83                                    Enforcement    Conference       Regarding                         l l

Multiple Examples of Failure to

1 Follow Procedure ) t

r;,

6

               *3/11/83'.               Operational- Enhancement        Program (Result    of    1/17/83    Enforcement Conference.)
               *5/11/83                 Management Meeting to Discuss T.S.

Changes Required For Recriticality

               *7/13/83                 Civil Penalty for Security Violation
               *8/15/83                 Management    Meeting      to   Discuss Licensee's Action on C0A - 10/20/82
              '*8/15/ - 19/83 8/30/84 - 9/1/,83       NRC Operational Readiness Inspection of Grand Gulf Unit 1
               *9/23/83                 Confirmation of Concurrence (C0C).

for Recriticality (Conditional Items of C0C Discussed in 9/23/83 Management Meeting with Licensee.) l 9/25/83 Recriticality -! 1

               *11/8/83                 Complete Testing at less Than 5%

Power

m 7

          *12/5/83-                               C0A on Recertification of Operating
                                .   .             . Staff (Result.of 10/31/83 - 11/4/83 Special Team Inspection and 11/11 &

11/18/83 Management Meetings.)

                                                  *11/21/83 - 2/10/84; Recertification Program     Implemented /0TEC     Review Performed (NRC Review /0bservation of Program Implementation.)
                                                  *2/13 - 24/84 & 3/12/84; NRC Oper-ator Recertification Exams (23 of 26 Passed. C0A(s) of 2/29/84 3/23/84 Confirm Removal of 3 Failures From Licensed Duty.)
          *12/8/83                                Commission Briefing on Grand Gulf Status
          *12/21/83                               Civil Penalty for Repeated Procedure Violations
          '2/21'- 24/84                            Special Team Inspection Comparing Technical        Specifications       to Installed Hardware        (T.S. Errors Found in 4 Areas, Several Unresolved T.S. Questions.)

           -                           -                                                                   ~

_ a

~~

8

                       *2/29/84-                         Commission Briefing on Status
                      '3/18/84                           Submittal of T.S. Review Program by w;                                                        MP&L
                      *3/28 - 30/84-                     Special Team Inspection to Observe the Grand Gulf T.S. Review Program.
                      *3/20/84                           Commission Briefing on T.S. Problems i,-
                      '4/18/84                           Order - Required Selected Changes to T.S. Prior to Restart.         (Limits Operating to Less than 5% Pending -

Completion of T.S. and TDI Diesel-Review.) l l

                   4/19 - 21/84                        Discovery / Correction    of     Drywell Personnel - Air     Lock (s)     Seismic Qualification (Both Containment-Air Lock (s) Received Seismic Modifi-cations the Week of 4/8/84. Drywell Mods Waived by NPE. Plant Management                 -

Discovered this Fallacy on 4/19/84 - Delayed Plant Restart.) a

                           '9
           *4/22/84             Restart ( <5% Power Operation;-
   ,                            Reper.formance of Low Power Testing on Modified Systems and Rejuvenate S/U Sources.)
          *5/2/84               Unit Shutdown;     (Both trains of containment spray declared In-Op resulting from 4/30/84   "B" RHR Pipe Crack Event & "A" RHR Pipe Hanger Movement - RII Specialist Inspectors

Onsite.)

          *5/6/84               RESTART (Continue Low Power Opera-tion;    4/30 Pipe Crack due to Vibration    Resulting from Excess Throttling of RHR HX Flow - Opera-ting Procedures Modified to Limit Throttiing.)
          '5/8/84-              UNIT Shutdown; (Recur'rence of "A" RHR Pipe Hanger Movement Resulting From "B" RHR Pump Starting Torque on          ,

Common Suction Piping - Hanger Redesigned) ,

       ' *5/11/84               RESTART     (Continue  Low    Power Operation) t i

e

7

10 m.

                '5/22/84'                                                   ORDER    -

Required Tear Down and. t Inspection of' Division I Diesel;

Incorporated Gas Power Turbines into - ,

T.S. (Low Power-Operation Continues.)

                '5[24/84                                                    Commission Meeting on GDC-17 and-a                                                                            5/22/84- Order; (3 to 1 Vote .Not to S/D Grand Gulf).                                     '
                *6/1/s4

_

Commission Mee' ting on GDC-17 & Legality of 5/22/84 Order; (3 to 2 Vote Not to S/0).

              '6/1/84                                                       Unit Shutdown - Concerns on 30 Day
                                                                                               ' ~

Water Supply to' SSW System - Licensee Identified and S/D. Plant.

              '6/4/84                                                       NRC & Consultants Observe ' Div. I Diesel Inspection by Licensee
              '6/4 - 8/84                                                  Requal Simulator and Oral Examina-t
                            ,                                              = tion of 4 License 0perators. . . All .4         -
   ;.                                                                      Pass     (2 Were Members     of   the Recertification Training staff, the Other 2 were Failures from the s

Original 26 that were Re-examined on 2/84 and 3/84.) e

a 4 4 g oa t< s - * *HP 1

og 11

       *6/1'3/84 - 7/8/84                             -Maintenance Outage in Progress.While SSW' System Deficiency 'i s Being Resolved-Plant S/D.

(Items Scheduled During Outage-Include Drywell Bypass Leakage Test, Repair of CRD Leaky Seals, Steam Tunnel Cooling Modifications and Selected Surveillances.) RAG 6bMFrP NRC Review of Licensee's Evaluation 1 , of Any Further Interaction Between Units 1 & 2, in Light of SSW Concern - (On Site Inspection.)

FUTURE PLANS OF RII (1) Operational Assessment of Plant and Staff Performance Prior to Exceeding 50% Power-p

                                                      .(2) Operational Assessment of' Plant and- Staff    Performance   Sub-sequent to Warranty Run.

! s 6 12 J e e EXPERIENCE REPORT REGION II 1 l i 1 l 8 e e

13 PLANT ACTIVITIES: JUNE 1982 - PRESENT October 1982 - September 1983 Confirmation Action Letter Dated October 20, 1982 Review and Rewrite of Surveillance Procedures Technical Specification Change Requests l March 1983 l Operations Enhancement Program i September 1983 Diesel-Generator Fire Operational Readiness Inspection . Completion of Technical Specification Changes Required for Restart September 25, 1983 - November 8, 1983 Recriticality and Complete Low Power Testing November 1983 - February 1984 Recertification of Licensed Operators

14 February - July 1984 Review of Technical Specifications April 22 - June 1,198a Resume Low Power Operation 't e h q 1 l I

.j

15 NRC has identified numerous problem areas at Grand Gulf. MP&L has taken

   ,   significant actions, which.are responsive to correction of areas of concerns that were identified'in the SALP report. Some of the actions taken are:

1. Completed a major operator recertification program and 23 of 26 licensed operators successfully passed the subsequent NRC requalification examina-tion. Four more subsequently passed NRC exams.

2. Implemented an extensive Operational Enhancement Program, which among many

other items required sensitization of' operators'to meticulously comply with' { regulatory requirements, including procedures. i I

3. Conducted system and simulator training of Shift Advisors and Shift Technical Advisors. These advisors underwent written examination and review of their performance and experience by the plant's Operator Training Evaluation Board.

4. Completed a comprehensive review of Technical Specifications with identi-fication and resolution of all known discrepancies. All required changes have been implemented in the Technical Specifications to be issued with the full power license.

5. MP&L has made Management personnel changes involved replacements of both the \

l l Plant Manager and the Assistant Plant Manager for Operations, with j individuals having previous nuclear commercial operating experience. The plant organization has been restructured to incorporate three Assistant Plant Managers for better management control. Since issuance of the low e *

  ....m
                                                                                                                      ~

16 power license the entire management chain, from company president down to operations supervisor has been changed. - Assessment Of Operating Staff performance Testing at less than 5% power was commenced September E5,1983, and completed on November 8. The testing progressed relatively smoothly, with only three reactor scrams occurring. Following recertification of all operators and Order correcting priority -TS problems Plant restarted April 22, 1984, for further testing'and operate'd to June 1, 1984'. Region II assesses the overall performance of the operations staff' and plant during the low power operations as good. Testing progressed at a deliberate pace and the operating staff 'was evaluated to be sensitive, to plant conditions, procedural requirements, and Technical Specifications. Licensee has taken conservative action to shutdown plant in response to problems. d

r y 17 r 5 e CURRENT ISSUES ' i l i 4 l-2 r 9 1 I e a e 6 i i 1: ) g. l 4 i '. k ; i 2 s l d e )

   % ~,.- x . . em..w, . _,

m.- ..m_._.-_..______,_._.. . _ , _ , , _ _ . _ _ , _ . , _ _ . _ - , _ . _ , _ , . . _ - . , . _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ - . - - , . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . . . . - . . _ . .

18 TRANSAMERICA DELAVAL L P DIESEL GENERATOR p-Crankshaft Failure - Shoreham August 22, 1983-Shoreham Straight 8 vs. Grand Gulf V-16 Region IV QA Investigation of Vendor

Shoreham Decision - G C'17 TDI Owner's Group Established, HP&L one of Leaders Both Diesels Disassembled for Inspection and Piston Replacement December 1983 - January 1984 ! Installation of Gas Turbines Further Detailed Inspection of Division One Diesel Generator Ordered May.22, 1984 NRC and Consultants Witnessed Work . No Significant Problems Identified Turbo Chargers Inspected on Division II Generator f~ Detailed Inspection of Division II Will Be Done at First Refueling I l

19 Grand Gulf TDI Diesels are Fully Operable Additional Technical Specification Requirements For Power Supply Reliability, o h

F F- , i- - i. ? 20 L I" . QUALIFICATION /RECERTIFICATION l9 PROGRAM I 10/81 Initial NRC Cold License Exams 5/82 - 9/83 Subsequent NRC Licensing Exams 2/83' RII Tra'ining Assessment Inspection ' 7/83 NRC Requalification Exams 8/83 - 9/83 RII Operational Readiness Assessment Inspection 9/30/84 MP&L Commitment to Verify Validity of Previous Applications 10/12/83 NRC/MP&L Management Meeting on Results of. Application Reviews . 10/31 - 11/4/83 Second RII Training Assessment Inspection 11/11/83'& 11/18/83 NRC/MP&L Management Meeting on Recerti - fication Program b_ 9 -

                                                                               ., ,       --       - , , -   -w -

i 21 11/21 --11/23/83 NRC Onsite Monitoring of Recertification Program Implementation . 12/5/83 - Confirmation of Action Letter Requiring Recertification 2/84 MP&L Completes ' Recertification Examina-tions 2/13 - 24/84 & NRC Examines All Operators, 23 of 26 3/12/84 Pass, C0A Letters of 2/29 and 3/23 Confirm Removal of 3 Failed Operators From Licensed Duties 6/4 - 8/84 NRC Examines and Passes Four Additional Operators - 2 of 3 Who Previously Failed, 2 From Training Staff Just Recertified by MP&L 7 ( e

                                                       '22 LICENSED OPERATOR RECERTIFICATION PROGRAM Recertification of Operators ' Required In Response To Region II Inspection Findings Program Accomplished November 1983 - March 1984 Program Review by AP&L, Duk'e Power, and General Electric All Licensed Operators (SRO & RO) were Recertified and Examined by Licensee Subsequent Examination of All Operators by NRC
         . Currently Grand Gulf has 27' Licensed Operators (15 SRO, 12 RO)

Five Shift Rotation Staff has Verified Adequate Knowledge of Licensed Operators Technical Specifications l'

Technical Specifications Issued June 12, 1982 With Operating License

l. Grand Gulf is First BWR-6 with Mark III Containment'to be Licensed by NRC i

e l

                                          .: L . , , -   i_____-,_.* L       ._ _ - _ .-- __.        !.   - _ _ _ _

l

23 Shortly after training, Region II inspections reveal TS discrepancies with as-built - plant. October 20 3 1982 Confirmation of Action- (C0A) letter requires TS review by appropriate change requests. By letters of August 29, 1983, September 7,1983, September 13 1983, and September 22, 1983, MP&L stated that- their actions were complete. Following an NRC Operational Readiness Inspection the plant was restarted to less than 5% power on September 25, 1983. Additional TS discrepancies continued to be found by the licensee and the

          ' NRC,    A special NRC inspection ' on February 21-24, 1984, in ten TS areas found TS errors in 4 areas on several unresolved TS questions.

On March 18, 1984, MP&L committed to a complete review of the TS to identify all discrepancies. MP&L now states that the earlier review of October 20, 1982 until September 22, 1983 emphasized surveillance and did not review the entire TS. Mp&L identified over 400 " Problem" areas with TS. These have been reviewed by the NRC staff and changes to the TS were found to be appropriate in over 200. All appropriate changes to the TS have been requested by MP&L. Changes will be issued with the full power license. l t I -

                                                                                     -.m- _ , _ -,__

m: ~ 24 OPERATING STAFF EXPERIENCE BWR Experienced Advisors (Conseltants) Each Shift Until 100% Power Advisors Were Certified on Grand Gulf Experienced Advisors to Operations Superintendent l Experienced Advisor to Vice President - Nuclear Staff Observed Advisor Training and Examinations Advisors are Adequately Trained O

25 NON-LICENSED PERSONNEL TRAINING On January 30, 1984, MP&L made a presentation to Region II management on their review of the status of non-licensed personnel training at Grand Gulf. The conclusions were documented by memo of February 11, 1983. Subsequently, Region II discovered further examples in which maintenance personnel did not receive and/or document all training required by plant

procedures. MP&L has made personnel changes in the maintenance supervisors. MP&L is conducting a comprehensive review of all past training to identify and correct any deficiencies. OI was-asked by Region II to investigate this matter. A final report has yet to be issued, but Regional Management has been briefed on the findings. Following review of the 01 report, a determination will be. made on any enforcement action. ( 0 l

26 OTHER ISSUES OF INTEREST e

r r-27 - RECENT, P!'S! dANAGEMENT CHANGES 4 Revised Plant Organization - Three Assistant Plant Managers Former Plant Manager Reassigned as Executive Advisor to Senior Vice President Assistant Plant Manager - Operations Reassigned as Plant Manager. Training Staff Strengthened Hired New Training Superintendent with Previous Industry Experience Hired Assistant Plant Manager - Operations and Technical Assistant with Previous BWR Licensed Experience

Experienced' Shift Superintendent Reassigned as Operations Superintendent Corporate Reorganization ,

r: i 28 STANDBY SERVICE WATER BASIN Early 1982 Preop testing discovered standby service water (SSW) flow capacity too low. Interim fix until first refueling was to administratively raise the design value for minimum suction head water level in Basin from 82' elevation to-107'. Larger pump to be installed at first refueling.

    ,          June 1,1984, plant was shutdown when licensee became aware of oversite in previous analysis. A single failure of either SSW pump would leave remaining operable basin with -less than 30 day water supply down to 107'.

If both pumps are not operable there is no way to transfer water basin to using installed equipment. June - July, passive siphon transfer device installed, tested, Basins become operable, restart plant for 5% power operation.

29 TMI ACTION ITEMS All TMI Actions Items required for- the issuance of a full power license have been completed. Only six (6) items remain open; five of which are not required until startup following the first refueling outage. The sixth item (II.F.2.4) concerns the adequacy of instrumentation for detection of inadequate core cooling. License Condition 2.C.(44)(f), which required the licensee to submit a report addressing the analysis performed by the BWR Owners Group regarding this item, has been satisfied. Any' determination for a'dditional instrumentation or modifi-cations resulting from NR's review of this report will be addressed in a later supplement to the SER and will be completed on a schedule acceptable to the staff. Required Item Subject Status Completion I i l l(Plant-Safety Parameter Display Console) l l 1.D.2.2 l

Installed l Open l I.D.2.3 l
Fully implemented l Open l I I I I.G.1.3 l (Training During Low Power Testing) l l l
Training and Results i Open l l 1 I II.F.2.4 l (Instrumentation for Detection of l l NRR Review -

l Inadequate Core Cooling) l l to be

Install Additional l l Reportedl addressed in l Inst l l later supple-l l l ment to SER I I I II.K.3.18.C.l (ADS Actuation) l l l ' Modification l Open l l- 1 I II.K.3.2.8 l (Qual of ADS Accumulators) l Open l l
Prior to Startup Following First Refueling Outage

e 1 L l I 30 j 5% POWER LICENSE CONDITIONS

i. . . . .

t All items contained in the license that are required to be completed prior to exceeding 5% power have been accomplished with the exception of Region II review of those tests identified in items 2.d.(1) and (4) of Attachment 1. The test results of these two tests, " Balance of Plant Piping Vibration Monitoring", and

             " Transient Test Equipment Verification", have just recently undergone an evaluation by the licensee. A Region II review is scheduled for the week of 7/15/84.

p 4 e y 9 -- . - - - -. c--g.- ** <--y- ee new --9-- -*F-*-# T " ' - " " " " " "

r.; , . s .t. ._.. t - - - . ,

     \ .'                                                                        '
                                                                        .                             =

7- / 3 - k Document.Name: , 35EX 3870-Requestor's ID: DEBBIE Author's Name:

            -C. JULIAN Document Comments:

COMMISSION BRIEFING PAPER ( $rta,< $s k e 9

. .e . 4

a

                                                                      ,   e   +.       .   *     * .,

a g u , u -a s =- = r - u as- a s > ,.s , -x.. - -.-.. -e- - ~. - +-a., - > . - - -

      --   4 .* -*%,.
                 .             - sw w     -;-%e   ... s         w. ,-       ,yc-,%     , .,                                            ,

4 - -

                                                  .t,'

r

                                                                                                                                                              .7
                      .!< k f                                                            .

j^ ~ t L , s Document Name: .. .- . . ja 35EX 3870 , l' l., : Requestor's ID: ' ,~ TRAINING-Author's Name: j-C. ~JULIAN - l - h Document Comments: COMMISSION BRIEFING PAPER I E G e I i l l l

                                    .                                                                                                                                                  l

v. w , , -ne--,,

q: w, cc' , y w' ' ty_';9 L e,

                         . t.
                                                                                                         'I Licensee / Plant Background
                                                                                                          's Licensee: Mississippi Power'and Light Company'(0perator)
                                . Middle South Energy, Inc.

South Mississippi Electric Power Association Plant: Location: Port Gibson, Mississippi Type Vendor: BWR/GE

                              ' AE/ Construction:       Bechtel Power Output:          1250 mwe (current 5% limit)

No Hearing' ' Lower Power License Issued: 6/12/82 First U.S. BWR/6 Mark III

.                                                                                                    r I

l e

+- _ , _ . _ . . . _ _ , e

         ,A.;=_

1 2 Plant Organization Advisor to Vice President - Nuclear Jim Green.' replaced Jim Groves. Mr. Green former Director of Power Production - TVA.

                              ' Nuclear Plant Manager Jim Cross replaced Ken McCoy.           Mr. Cross has extensive non-license nuclear power plant experience at Browns Ferry and Watts Bar. He was Assistant Plant Manager - Operations at Sequoyah.

Assistant Plant Manager - Operations Rick Rogers now occupies the position -vacated upon Jim Cross' promotion. Mr. -Rogers was naval nuclear officer, Senior Resident Inspector, NRC RII, and Operations Superintendent (licensed SRO) at Plant Hatch. Advisor to Assistant Plant Manager - Operations Mike Wright. Mr. Wright was a licensed SR0 at Dresden. He was assigned as Shift Engineer (Shift Foreman). l e

   .        O                     8

m -- .a = . . . - ..

    ' ..?

.jy

 ,-                                                          3 Plant Procedures p;                          .                      .                              .
           -9 Licensee .'recently completed an extensive review of plant Surveillance Procedures Inspection by Region II. No known major problems, Procedures are in very good condition.

Review of operating procedures by Region II prior to licensing No known major problems. Review of plant . emergency procedures by NRR and Region II inclu' ding i simulator checkout No known major problems. Review of plant administrative procedures by Region II r Administrative procedures currently undergoing Licensee review and revision for: compatibility incorporation of regulatory requirements format i f l l

        .~                    .         .

                                          .                 ~.     .

1

        .2     ,

4

                          . Estimated completion by August 1, 1984.

Op 6,; Other Long-Term Corrective Actio (M Include: Established New Plant Organization with Three Assistant Plant Managers Addition of an SRO as the Operations-Training Supervisor Establishment of an In-Plant Operations Training Center STAS and Shift Advisors will Train with Shift The addition of a Corporate Nuclear Human Resource Manager to insure adequate resources coming into the training pipeline Procedure Define Responsibility of Shift Advisors r-f 9

i:

   "s    --

5 Operator Recertification

'^

During inspection by Region II examiners, as a result of operator qualification card inconsistencies, operators were found to be weak on plant walkthroughs. Licensee conducted requalification/recertification program consisting of: system training

                       ' system checkouts in plant and simulator including conduct'of applicable surveillance procedures individual training record board reviews and certifications individual knowledge level board reviews and certifications Reexamination by Region II operators examiners 23 of 26 passed       giving the plant 10 R0s and 13 SR0s. ,

Region II considers this number adequate to operate the plant. Reexamination and recertification by licensee of the shif t technical advisor Additional training of the experienced shif t advisors in simulator. plant startup procedures plant emergency procedures

                    #                   6              0                                          4

r-s s - 6 Agastat Relays PROBLEM: Ouring August 1983 surveillance testing, 12 inoperable Agastat type relays were found. These relay failures precluded the . automatic operation of' components'in at least nine' safety-related systems. CAUSE: Failures were associated with end o f- life /normally energized - pre-August 1977 Agastat GP Series relays. ACTIONS TAKEN: (1) Replacement of safety-related normally energized, pre-August 1977 Agastat. GP Series relays (with post-August 1977) was completed during the existing outage period. (2) MP&L has ~ submitted their analysis on the effe'ct of varying the testing intervals for the ECCS & RPS. . 4 o 9 1 4

                   ; a.a           ...                     , . . , . . . .g -y.   ~ . .              .-

._ [ . % :. ,, J ,g.. - -

              .             ~                                                                                                      .

[; - - 7

                                                                               -Diesel Rework     s-a
                            < Region. II' inspectors : observed - portions of Diesel Inspections,-. Repairs Card Retesting including the following:

t Diesel Disassembly

NOE of . Pistons .

                                       . Head-Inspections
                              -:        Reasserbly of-Diesel                                                                 '
          .                            '100 Hours Test.Run;
                                                                                                             . s Ib' s

b _o = L 4. 6 f 4

  $s .               -p.

g - ,z , ,

v 5 y -_ e.,,. _ m 8 - Brown Boveri Electric (Formerly ITE) Circuit Breaker PROBLEM: Trip units with serial nuters below 28300, have a potential for a capacitor failure which ultimately will cause the trip unit not to

respond to an overcurrent condition, thus not tripping the associated breaker (s). This condition could result in tne. loss of the respective bus due to overload condition. SAFETY . - ' IMPLICATION: These BKRs are used for all engineered safety feature (ESF) load control center (LCC) breakers, the loss of which could represent a substantial safety-hazard. ACTIONS ! TAKEN: All trip units with serial numbers below 28300 were upgraded - during this outage period. e i p m_ -

1 9 Plant Performance A. Last SALP - July 1, 1981 through August 30, 1982 1 l Preoperational Testing (Unit 1) 1. Plant Operations and Operational Preparation - Category 3

2. Pre. operational and Surveillance Testing - Category 3

3. Plant Security and Safeguards - Category 2

       '4. Radiological Controls - Category 2

5. Operational Quality Assurance Program - Category 2

6. Emergency Preparedness - Category 2 Construction (Unit 1)

7. Soils and Foundation - Not rated

8. Containment and Other Safety Related Structures - Not rated

9. Piping Systems and Supports - Category 2

10. Safety Related Components - Not rated

11. Support Systems - Category 2

12. Electrical Power Supply and Distribution - Category 2

13. Instrumentation and Controi - Category 2

14. Licensing Activities - Category 2

15. Construction Quality Assurance Program - Category 2 a

p ~ . . . . 10 ' B. This SALP - September 1, 1982 to September 30, 1983 Unit 1 - 1. Plant Doerations, Operator Licensing and Reporting - Category 3

2. Radiological Controls - Category 2

3. Maintenance - Category 3 4

                          #reoperational Testing and Surveillance - Category 3

5. Fire Protection - Category 2

6. Emergency Preparedness - Category 1

7. Security and Safeguards - Category 2

8. Refueling - Not Rated

9. Licensing Activities - Category 3

10. Quality Assurance Progras' - Category 3 Ui,t' 2 - Construction

[ Not Evaluated f' I t [. .

           ,4        -

p,,. , 11

1. _ Category 1 Areas Emergency Planning - Last SALP'2-

2. Category 2 Areas Last SALP Radiological Controls 2 Fire Protection 2 Security and Safeguards 2

3. Category 3 Areas Plant Operations 3 Maintenance -

Surveillance 3

                   . Licensing Activities                                                   2 QA Program 2

4. From Last SALP performance decreased in two areas:

Licensing, QA Program and improved in one area: Emergency Preparedness

                                             -                                                   ~

r- + g -

12 '

        ' 7. Category 3 Area Highlights

a. Plant Operations (1) Failure to follow procedures (2) Inadequate control of temporary jumpers (3). Inadequate independent. verification (4) Inadequate safety evaluations Had 2 enforcement conferences '

(5) Had difficulty meeting NRC commitments (6) Operations staffing marginal (7) Performance improved (a) Tracking ~of NRC Concerns (b) Reporting of Events (8) Concern subsequent to the period in performance of licensed operators.

b. Maintenance . -

(1) Minimal management involvement in maintenance (2) Maintenance schedules overly optimistic (3) Adherence to procedures was not always meticulous

'~ 13

c. Surveillance (1) Procedures did not implement all TS requirements

(2) Several surveillances not being performed; weaknesses in admin-istrative controls for surveillance procedures and changes (3) No formal QA audit

d. Licensing Activities (1) Submittals contained errors (2) Some responses timely, some late

e. QA Program (1) Insufficient legible copies of control room drawings in Control Room (2) QA department not routinely observing Quality Control activities

  .              (3) QA department granting excess time for corrective action (4) QA program appears adequate but due to large number of problems identified, it appears ineffective.

O l. [ . . .

r

s 14 ' Technical Specification Verification

                      . Team Inspection conducted February 21-24, 1984-

_ Objective was to compare the Technical Specification (TS) to the installed hardware. Results were as follows: In two areas no discrepancies were found: Standby Gas Treatment Hydrogen Recombiners In four areas,_ TS errors were found along with several unresolved TS questions. ECCS and ECCS Actuation Instrumentation:

1. JTS specify only 7 SRVs for ADS; 8 are installed

2. ECCS pump discharge head values are inconsistent between TS SER and FSAR Primary and Drywell Integrity

                   '1.      Outboard MSIV leakage control has no heater
        *                            +                                         *

. = . .. . , , . , . *

15

2. Surveillance incorrectly requires testing of equipment hatch after any penetration maintenance ..

Containment Spray Surveillance specifies incorrect pump discharge head Suppression pool

1. ' Don't have 's0rveillance for suppression pool makeup actuation instruments

2. TS describes two level sensors / division; there are four installed

3. Level instruments are not clearly referenced in TS so you don't know if you are in n Action Statement

4. Instrument readings don't agree due to temperature compensation

5. TS specifics 12 thermocouples, 24 are installed; doesn't specify which are TS required

6. Other minor errors and questions Several unresolved questions were identified on TS in the following areas.

Containment and Drywell Isolation Valves Secondary Containment Dampers and Valves Emergency Power Supplies i l l

                 . - -               -        _,m      , * - -

r -

A- 4 4 .s eaee) -e..

                                                                                     'T    ,iW#-

8 d 16- - 1

IsolationiActuation Instrumentation L

                                                     ~
                                              -Based ' on .these findings,-l Region :II .' concludes .thAt previous MP&L reviews.
                   .                            although su'b'stantial, were not' totally adequate 'to ' correct all errors ~and
                                              ; deficiencies in the TS.-                                                                                            ,
                                                .=.

O y. J 2 4 e

p.-

                                                                                                                                                                  't i

1

                                                                                                                                                   ,--.          .*h e

s

e

               '4.-

1.+- , :;. 4 p f

6 4 %

J

5 2; ,

a + 4 3 l

                               , . s                                                                                                                                 .

[ I_' q E.'

                                  .            .~                                                    .              .  .                                    ,

lm-17 MEMORANDUM DIRCKS TO COMMISSIONERS - DRAFT PERSONNEL ERRORS AT SELECK D OPERATING PLANTS Thi's memorandum presents data in two tables and concludes that " clearly from

         . Tables 1 and 2, Grand Gulf has reported more personnel errors than the other units analyzed". The memorandum'does note that " care should be taken in reaching conclusions from this data".

The first table compares Grand Gulf with Quad Cities 1 and 2 and Sequoyah I and 2 for 50.72 reports to the IE Duty Officer. These sites are inappropriate for

         . comparison due to the extensive operating history of Quad Cities and Sequoyah compared to Grand Gulf. The 50.72 data base is very suspect as the events are
         - reported within one hour of occurrence, not normally updated, and thus the exact cause of the occurrence is not always known. Additionally, the total number of personnel errors is provided with no relation to t.ie total number of reports.

The second table compares SCSS data for Grand Gulf with Quad Cities'and Sequoyah. Data for Sequoyah is presented by unit and includes the first year of commercial operation for each unit. Again, the facilities selected for comparison are inappropriate as is the time period for the Sequoyah units. A better comparison would have been the first year after issuance of the low power license vice first' .

        . year of commercial operation (for example, when comparing the following
        - Sequoyah. l low power license, and the year following -their full power license, the percent of personnel error LERs is 30% and 11%, respectively). The SCSS data is generated by AE00 using software developed under contract. Because of the short lead time and because no region has direct access to the data base, we are

mig .

       ,-0
                                                              - 18 unable to analyze. the specific data.- - SCSS assigns multiple causes/ effects to each, LER. Thus', . one LER . may . result .in several " hits" in the data base ' for personnel errors.' To some extent then, the depth to which the LERs are written
                 ' influences the number of causes/ effects' which AEOD assigns to each LER and tnus may influence the result. Without access'to the data base, though, review of-the i

_. data for this and other . types of discrepancies is not practical.

                           .s.O                                                                4 e

.l t 1 s e ' 9'; , L I I r

                                                                                                                 ., * .i

(D 19 p _ SIGNIFICANT DATES FOR THE DIRCKS MEMO AND [ FOR THE REGION II SLIDES - L' Plant- OL Crit. Commer.

                     . . Quad' Cities-1    10/71                               10/71                       8/72 Quad' Cities'.2      4/72                                4/72,                      8/72-Grand Gulf 1         6/82 (LP)

Sequoyah l' 3/80 (LP) - 9/80 (FP) 7/80 7/81 Sequoyah 2 9/81_ 11/81 6/82. Hatch 2 6/78- 7/81 9/79

                     - LaSalle              4/82-                               6/83
   .g                                    P
                                               -SLIDE #1 - OPS VIOLS / SITE / UNIT SLIDE #2 -~ VIOL /1000 HRS / SITE / UNIT k

4 W

_ .__ _ m _

wm- - em i,-- 1

20 SLIDE #3 - TOTAL NUMBER OF LERS This slide indicates that Grand Gulf, with 246 LERs during a twelve month period after licensing, had a greater number of LERS than plants in a similar status (Hatch - ~ 88; Sequoyah -189; and LaSalle - 149 for 81/2 months). However, if Grand Gulf LERs for propping open of fire doors for the purpose of construction activities are " backed-out", the resulting number of LERs,185, is in line with the Sequoyah total. Additionally, if LaSalle LER total (149) is extrapolated to 12 months, th'e resultant' total (210) is a' Iso similar to the' Grand Gulf total. Note _that the large number of fire door LERs was caused, in part, by the

    . unusually large amount of construction activity at Grand Gulf which was taking place subsequent to issuance of the low power _ license.

. . g

e -- . S

                                         ._. .m . ...a_   1c.  .    .-

9'. 21 SLIDE'#4 - PERCENT. PERSONNEL ERRORS This slide indicates that the percent of Grand Gulf LERs attributed to personnel ' errors was' _ lower than the percent at other facilities in similar stages of startup (Hatch 2 -40%; Sequoyah 1 - 30%;'and LaSalle - 27 '4 ) . The percentage is larger than national averages, though (U.S. AV - 17%; GE AV - 16*4). If fire door related LERs are " backed-out" of the Grand Gulf ' total, then the personnel error percent increases from 19*4 to 25%.

                                                         %n e

c . .

 ,         ~. .:
                                                                                                    ~

22. NOT A SLIDE

                                                  -CAUSES OF PERSONNEL ERRORS.
                  . Surveillance. Interval Exceeded                            23%

Fire Protection Events 19%

                         '(FireWatches',Cd2: System,Etc.)                           * '

Improper Performance of Surveillance. 11%- Improper Perfo6 nance of Maintenance 13% Other 34% f y- . . . .

e t o qg - - o__- z VrRA , _ _ EV A _ _A :: : \

                                                     .  .a

1. A MAJOR STRENGTH WAS IDENTIFlED IN THE

~~

AREA 0F EMERGENCY PLANNING.

2. MA.JOR WEAKNESSES WERE IDENTIFIED IN THE AREAS OF PLANT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE, SURVEILLANCE AND PREOPERATIONAL TESTING, LICENSING ACTIVITIES, AND THE QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM.

3. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS INITIATED BY THE LICENSEE HAVE SLOWLY RESULTED IN IMPROVEMENTS IN MANY PROGRAMS.

HOWEVER, SOME AREAS CONTINUE TO EXHIBIT - MAJOR WEAKNESSES. 9 l

^ 4.^ THE ROOT CAUSES OF THE MAJOR WEAKNESSES APPEARED TO INCLUDE THE

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH PLANT . .., PROCEDURES. THE FAILURE TO UNDERST.AND AND COMPLY WITH THE REGULATIONS ~ GOVERNING.THE EVALUATION OF THE SAFETY _ SIGNIFICANCE OF CERTAIN MODIFICATIONS, THE FAILURE TO EVALUATE PROBLEMS IN -- SUFFICIENT DEPTH TO AFFECT ADEQUATE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS, AND THE FAILURE TO PROVIDE FACILITY PERSONNEL WITH ADEQUATE TRAINING.

5. THE LICENSEE HAS DEVOTED SIGNIFICANT RESOURCES TO SOLVE THE IDENTIFIED PROBLEMS. THESE EFFORTS HAVE NOT YET BEEN COMPLETELY SUCCESSFUL, RESULTING IN THE NEED FOR CONTINUED INCREASED LICENSEE ATTENTION IN CERTAIN AREAS. .

l

_ l

\

~~

l l

6. ~

NRC' BELIEVES, AT'THIS TIME, THAT THE

~~

LI'CENSEE HAS RECOGNIZED THESE PROBLEMS AND HAS PROPOSED CORRECTIVE ACTIONS SUFFICIENT TO SOLVE THEM. Ia N O 6 e D 5

J

                           ~~:: _ ::- Y              _ A- :: :
                                                                     ~

_ EV A _ N

                                                                   .     .a

1. THE LICENSEE HAS UNDERTAKNN SIGNIFICANT ~

IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS TO ENHANCE . COMMUNICATIONS AND TECHNICAL EXCHANGE BETWEEN THE PLANT AND THE CORPORATE -- 0FFICE.

2. THE ASSESSMENT FOR THIS SALP PERIOD REFLECTS AN IMPLEMENTATION PERIOD DURING WHICH COMPREHENSIVE IMPROVEMENT i

PROGRAMS WERE INSTITUTED TO CORRECT SIGNIFICANT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED DURING THE PREVIOUS SALP ASSESSMENT PERIOD.

3. THESE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS HAVE SLOWLY RESULTED IN IMPROVEMENTS IN MANAGEMENT CONTROL AND THE TIMELINESS OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS.

O a O e g g

4. RANAGEMENT' CONTROL, AS IT RELATES TO 1 ADHERENCE TD PROCEDURES AND INDEPTH ANALYSIS OF PLANT PROBLEMS, NEEDS _

IMPROVEMENT. -a

5. LICENSEE MANAGEMENT PRESENCE, AT THE ..

SITE, HAS-IMPROVED, AND TOP. LEVEL. - M'ANMAGEMENT NOW PARTICIPATES TO A GREATER DEGREE IN DAY-TO-DAY ACTIVITIES ~- AND THE RESOLUTION OF PROBLEMS AND TECHNICAL CONCERNS. S 6 9 4 9 4,

 ,     .                                           ,      e

COMMISSION BRIEFING GRAND GULF, UNIT 1 FULL POWER AMENDMENT JULY 31, 1984 SLIDE I s

                                             .m..
 .        ,                     a

LICENSEE / PLANT BACKGROUND LICENSEES:

MISSISSIPPI POWER & LIGHT COMPANY (OPERATOR) MIDDLE SOUTH ENERGY, INC. SOUTH MISSISSIPPI ELECTRIC POWER ASSOCIATION PLANT: LOCATION: PORT GIBSON, MISSISSIPPI 2 UNITS: VENDOR / TYPE: GE BWR 6/MK III AE/ CONSTRUCTOR: BECHTEL POWER LEVEL: 1250 MWE - EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS: ONSITE EP ADEQUATE - MAY 1983 0FFSITE EP ADEQUATE (INCLUDING FEMA FINDINGS) - MAY 1983 44 CFR 350 SIGNOFF FROM FEMA - JUNE 29, 1983 LAST EMERGENCY EXERCISE - APRIL 10-12, 1984 FEMA (INTERIM) FINDINGS ON APRIL EXERCISE - JULY 30, 1984 SLIDE 2

BACKGROUND /CHRON0 LOGY JUNE 16, 1982' LOW POWER LICENSE ISSUED JULY 1, 1982 COMMENCED FUEL LOADING AUGUST 8, 1982 COMPLETED FUEL LOADING AUGUST 18, 1982 INITIAL CRITICALITY SEPTEMBER 16, 1982 NON-NUCLEAR HEATUP TESTING COMMENCED OCTOBER 25, 1982 STARTED MAINTENANCE OUTAGE

                               - DRYWELL COOLING SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS SEPTEMBER 25, 1983      RECRITICALITY AND COMMENCED LOW POWER     .

TESTING NOVEMBER 8, 1983 COMPLETED LOW POWER TESTING APRIL 18, 1984 TECH SPEC ORDER ISSUED APRIL 22, 1984 LOW POWER OPERATION RESUMED MAY 2, 1984 PLANT SHUTDOWN - RHR PIPE PROBLEMS MAY 6, 1984 PLANT RESTART MAY 8, 1984 PLANT SHUTDOWN - RHR PROBLEM RECURRENCE MAY 11, 1984 PLANT RESTART MAY 22, 1984 DIESEL ENGINE INSPECTION ORDER JUNE 1, 1984 PLANT SHUTDOWN BY MP8L PENDING RESOLUTION OF STANDBY SERVICE WATER SYSTEM DESIGN COMMISSION MEETINGS SINCE OL ISSUANCE DECEMBER 8, 1983 STATUS REPORT FEBRUARY 29, 1984 STATUS REPORT MARCH 20, 1984 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS MAY 24, 1984 TDI DIESEL ENGINE ORDER JUNE 1, 1984 TDI DIESEL ENGINE ORDER

SLIDE 3

MAJOR PLANT MODIFICATIONS SINCE OL ISSUANCE MODIFICATIONS 0CTOBER 1982 TO JUNE 1983 DRYWELL COOLING SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS REACTOR PROTECTION SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS PLANT. SERVICE WATER SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS ISOLATION VALVE STATUS BOARD INSTALLATION ADDITION TO PLANT AIR SYSTEM SOLID RADWASTE SYSTEM MODIFICATION MODIFICATIONS JUNE 1983 TO PRESENT REPLACEMENT OF AGASTAT RELAYS GAS TURBINE GENERATORS INSTALLED (INTERIM MEASURE) STANDBY SERVICE WATER BASIN MODIFICATION PIPE SUPPORT MODIFICATIONS DUE TO SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION ANALYSIS l 1

SLIDE 4

l

                                  . SELECTED ISSUES              '

l TECH SPECS TDI DIESEL INSPECTIONS TDI DIESEL (GDC 17) EXEMPTION

*~

SHIFT ADVISOR QUALIFICATIONS . MANAGEMENT /0PERATING EXPERIENCE MANAGEMENT SALP RECERTIFICATION/ TRAINING 2.206 PETITION FULL F0WER LICENSE AMENDMENT SLIDE 5

SUMMARY

'0F GRAND GULF TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW PROGRAM INITIATED MARCH 1984 BY MAY-1, 1984, MP8L HAD SUBMITTED 416 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION PROBLEM SHEETS (TSPS).

      . PROBLEM SHEETS DEVELOPED BASED ON COMPARIS0N OF TS WITH:

FSAR AS-BUILT PLANT SER OTHER' DOCUMENTS BWR/6-STS OF THESE 416: ITEMS REQUIRING CHANGES TO TS 220 ITEMS REQUIRING NO CHANGE

168 CHANGES IMPLEMENTED BY ORDER 4/18/84 22 CHANGES ISSUED WITH AMENDMENT 12 6 TOTAL 416 OF THE 220 REQUIRING CHANGES:

, TO REFLECT AS-BUILT PLANT 34 TO COMPLY WITH NEW REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS 51 TO ENHANCE THE TS 64 - THAT ARE ADMINISTRATIVE 6

       *                                                             ~

TO CLARIFY ORIGINAL INTENT OF TS 45 THAT ARE EDITORIAL 20 TOTAL 220 SLIDE 6

GRAND GULF TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS NON-REPRESENTATIVE PLANT ITEMS REQUIRED IN TS, NOT SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED IN FSAR, NOT ACTUALLY.IN PLANT EXPLOSIVE VALVES IN THE TIP SYSTEM TEMPORARY RADWASTE HOLDUP TANKS 0FFSITE AC POWER CIRCUIT AUTOMATIC TRANSFER FEATURE , VOLTAGE INSTRUMENTATION ON MCC PANELS REQUIRED IN TS, CONSISTENT WITH FSAR, FSAR INCORRECTLY DESCRIBED ACTUAL PLANT FUEL GRAPPLE INTERLOCK LOAD SHEDDING AND SEQUENCER AUTOMATIC FUNCTION LOW CONDENSER VACUUM BYPASS . 1 ACCURATELY DESCRIBED IN FSAR, INCORRECTLY DESCRIBED IN TS HYDROGEN RECOMBINER PENETRATIONS DRYWELL HYDROGEN RECOMBINER REQUIRED IN TS, NOT SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED IN FSAR, TS INCORRECT WITH RESPECT TO ACTUAL PLANT FUEL TUBE TRANSFER SYSTEM REQUESTEDBYMP&LASTSCHANGE,NOTACTUALLYINPLkNT LEVER ARM ON VACUUM BREAKERS r SLIDE 7

V -

1 4. ,. g ;- - . . s ' s.

4

9 I 1 TECH SPEC CONCLUSION

                       ~
                       .. TECH. SPEC DEFICIENCIES IDENTIFIED --ALL CORRECTED WITH: FULL POWER LICENSEANENDMENT
                                                                             -9 4

6 ' I e \ SLIDE 8 .

TDI DIESEL GENERATOR -

     - GENERIC EVENTS
          -MAIN CRANKSHAFT BROKE ON TDI AT SH0REHAM TDI OWNEFS GROUP FORMED STAFF TD! PROJECT GROUP FORMED OWNERS GROUP PROGRAM PLAN SUBMITTED GRAND' GULF EVENTS-D/G OPERATING ~ EXPERIENCE REPORT SUBMITTED                  -

INTERIM AND UPDATED D/G INSPECTION REPORTS SUBMITTED ONSITE/0FFSITE POWER' ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM AND RELIABILITY SUBMITTED

          -STAFF EVALUATION OF D/G RELIABILITY                  -

ORDER ISSUED FOR TEARDOWN INSPECTION STAFF OBSERVED ENGINE INSPECTION INSPECTION AND SURVEILLANCE TEST REPORT SUBMITTED STAFF EVALUATION OF INSPECTIONS, SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURES AND ENGINE-RELIABILITY s STAFF CONCLUSIONS GRAND GULF TDI DIESELS SHOWN TO HAVE ADEQUATE RELIABILITY; DIESELS MEET GDC-17 f SLIDE 9

.)

GDC-17 EXEMPTION FOR LOW POWER , MAY 16, 1984 SHOREHAM ORDER i MAY 18, 1984 MP8L INFORMED OF NEED FOR EXEMPTION (INCLUDING ADDRESSING EXIGENCY AND "AS SAFE AS") JUNE 4,-1984

                               -MP&L' FILES EXEMPTION- REQUEST                        i
                                                                                            ' 9)

MID-JUNE 1984 STAFF REQUESTED INFORMATION TO EVALUATE: T0 PRESENT "AS SAFE AS" , s

                                         " EXIGENCY" t

l

                                                      \
                                                                      .       SLIDE 10
                                                                                                     =
                                                                         's a

REVIEWS OF SHIFT ADVISOR (SA) PROGRAM INDUSTRY REVIEW APRIL 24-26, 1984 - SIX MEMBER UTILITY ADVISOR EVALUATION TEAM REVIEWED ALL ASPECTS BETWEEN SHIFT AREAS AND SA'S, I PROCEDURES AND EXAMINATIONS FINDINGS EFFECTIVE PROGRAM QUALIFIED INDIVIDUALS - APPROPRIATE TRAINING NRC REVIEW REVIEWED SA TRAINING PROGRAM, JOB DESCRIPTIONS, QUALIFICATIONS FINDINGS: l

PROGRAM EXAMINATIONS ADEQUATE
PROGRAM MEETS WORKING GROUP STANDARDS
PROGRAM MEETS INDUSTRY RECOMMENDED QUALIFICATIONS OBSERVED OTEC BOARD EVALUATION; INSPECTED SA TRAINING, EXPERIENCE, DOCUMENTATION SLIDE 11 a

_ _ - - - - - i

EXPERIENCE REPORT REGION II MP&L MANAGEMENT CAPABILITIES

                  - CORPORATE REORGANIZATION           .                         .
                  - CORPORATE EXPERIENCE OF POWER REACTORS ASSESSMENT OF FACILITY PERFORMANCE PLANT MANAGEMENT CHANGES PLANT OPERATION DURING LOW POWER TESTS SALP EVALUATION (SINCE 1/84)

INSPECTION a 200% BUDGET
PLANT OPERATIONS j

                         *MAINTENA'NCE                                                      l

SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURES

                          '0VALITY ASSURANCE

LICENSING ACTIVITIES COMPLETION OF LICENSE REQUIREMENTS FOR LOW POWER TESTS LICENSED OPERATOR QUALIFICATIONS RHR PIPE CRACK
i p EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS RADIOLOGICAL-AND SECURITY PREPAREDNESS

. REGION II CONCLUSIONS

                      /5 CRO

12. R o

                     .3 c>m .RO m. - (

l , i+i-E ~~.6 <f'C.m.. SLIDE 12

I , . DocuMEin NAME: SALP/6-16 ,- REQUESTOR'S ID: DEBBIE AumoR'S NAME: DLEWIS DOCUMEfa LOMtEfGS: i l l 1 J l 1 l l e

   . 1 ?.

SYSTEFATIC ASSESSE NT OF LICENSEE PERFORPatiCE I WOULD LIKE BRIEFLY TO DESCRIBE THE NRC ASSESSMENT OF THE LICENSEE'S PERFORFANCE. 1 WOULD HASTEN TO POINT OUT AND PLEASE KEEP IN MIND MR, CHAIRFAN THAT THE SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT OF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE REFERRED TO WITHIN NRC AND THE INDUSTRY AS SALF IS A CAMERA SNAP SHOT OF PERFORPANCE DURING A SPECIFIC PERIOD OF TIE IN THE PAST. THE RATING THAT WE ASSIGN TO THE PERFORPANCE OF THE LICENSEE CAN BE AFFECTED BY EVEhTS THAT TOOK PLACE AS HJCH AS 18 M0hTHS PRIOR TO THE FORMAL EVALUATION PROCESS. PERFORPANCE LEVEL CAN BE AFFECTED BY PANY THINGS. IT IS AFFECTED BY THE NtIGER OF LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS WHICH IS DIRECTLY RELATED TO THE PHASE OF THE PLANT LIFE AND ACTIVITIES DURING THAT EVALUATION PERIOD; PERFORPANCE IS AFFECTED BY THE NUSER OF NONCOMPLIANCES THAT WERE IDENTIFIED DURING THE EVALUATION PERIOD, WHICH IS DIRECTLY INFLUENCED BY THE NLIGER OF INSPEC-TIONS, BY THE INSPECTORS, BY THE hU SER OF INVESTIGATIONS THAT HAVE OCCURRED AT THE SITE; IS SIGNIFICANTLY INFLUENCED AS TO WHETHER THE LICENSEE HAS THE STANDARD TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS OR IS AN OLDER PLANT WITH NON-STANDARD TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS; IS AFFECTED BY THE NUMBER OF LICENSEE AMENDMENTS SUEMITTED BY THE LICENSEE AND BY THE CORPORATE INVOLVEMENT IN PLANT ACTIV-ITIES. I WOULD ALSO DJICKLY P01hT OUT THAT IF YOU LOOK AT THE SALP RATINGS ASSIGNED TO LICENSEES BETWEEN THE FIVE REGIONAL OFFICES, YOU WILL FIND THAT ThERE IS A SIGNIFICAhT DIFFERENCE IN A RATING PROCESS WHICH IS A HIGHLY SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION AND VARIES SIGNIFICAhTLY BETWEEN THE FIVE REGIONS. FOR INSTANCE lh REGION 11, IN THE STATISTICAL DATA THAT 1 REVIEWED, RECEKiLY REVEALS THAT

p

2 REGION 11 HAS TWICE AS PANY OPERATIONS CATEGORY 3 FACILITIES (EVALUATED TO BE SATISFACTORY BlfT LICENSEE PEPFORPANCE COULD BE IWROVED) AS ANY OTHEr. REGION. IN REGION 11 WE HAVE A VERY FOPFALIZED EVALUATION PROCESS THA'T REQUIRES ALL TECHNICAL DIVISION DIRECTORS AND A NRR FANAGER FORFALLY CONDUCT AN EVALUATION BOARD WITH THE COGNIZANT INSPECTORS AND SECTION CHIEFS APPEAR-ING BEFORE THAT BOARD AND PROVIDING INFORPAL TESTIMONY TO THE BOARD ON THE PERFORFANCE OF THAT LICENSEE. LET E REVIBi FOR YOU THOSE CATEGORIES THAT CAN BE ASSIGNED TO A LICENSEE,

OF COURSE THEPE IS ALWAYS THE UNSATISFACTORY CATEGORY WHICH EANS THAT THE LICENSEE WOULD BE SHUTDOWN PRIOR TO THE SALP BOARD EETING. A CATEGORY 1 IS CONSIDERED TO BE A TOP A0ilEVER IN THE AREA BEING EVALUATED; A CATEGORY 2 IS EVALUATED THAT THE LICENSEE RESOURCES ARE ADEQUATE TO ACHIEVE SAFETY AND NRC INSPECTION WOULD REMAIN AB0LTT THE SAE; A CATEGORY 3, WHICH SEEMS OF LATE, TO INDICATE IN SOME PEOPLE MINDS THAT THE LICENSEE'S PERFORPANCE IS UNSATIS-FACTORY TO ASSURE SAFETY TO THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF THE PUBLIC WHEN THEY ARE ASSIGNED THIS CATEGORY 3 RATING. PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT IN OUR EVALUA-TION PROCESS THAT A CATEGORY 3 RATING EANS THAT THE LICENSEE'S PERF0PFANCE IS STILL SATISFACTORY TO ACHIEVE NUCLEAR SAFETY AND ASSURE PROTECTION TO THE HEALTH AIO SAFETY OF THE PUBLIC. IN A CATEGORY 3 RATING, WE EXPECT THE LICENSEE TO FOCUS ATTENTION ON THIS APEA TO IPPROVE. WE WOULD ALSU EXPECT THAT THE NRC WOULD PLACE INCREASED EWHASES IN THIS AREA UNTIL A HIGHER - LEVEL IS ATTAINED. LET E N'J4 DISCUSS BPslEFLY THOSE NRC EVALUATIONS (SALP) THAT HAVE BEEh PEPFORMED OF THE GRAND GULF FACILITY: IN SALP'S 1 AfD 2 CONDUCTED DURING THE PERIOD OF SEPTEMBER 1979 - AUGUST 1980, AND AUGUST 1980 - SEPTEMBER

3 1981, THE LICENSEE'S CONSTRUCTION WAS EVALUATED AS A CATEGORY 2 WHICH MEANS THAT RESOURCES AND PERFORPANCE WAS ADEQUATE. THE SURVEILLANCE AND PREOPE - RATIONAL TESTING AREAS WHICH WERE LIMITED DURING THIS PERIOD, WERE IDENTI-FIED AS CATEGORY 3, AIO REQUIRING ADDITIONAL ATTENTION BY THE LICENSEE. A CONFIRPATION OF ACTION LETTER WAS ISSUED IN DECEMBER 1981, WHICH WAS FOLLOWED BY AN ENFORCEENT CONFERENCE IN FEBRUARY 1982. THE LICENSEE TERMINATED PREOPERATIONAL TESTING TO BETTER CONTROL THE TESTING PROGRAM AfD TO ASSURE ADDITIONAL SITE QA IINOLVEMEhT IN TESTING ACTIVITIES TO ACHIEVE AN IIPROVBih7, SALP 3, WHICH COVERED THE PERIOD OF SEPTD1BER 1981 - AUGUST 1982, INCLUDED 12 FUNCTIONAL AREAS OF WHICH 2 AREAS 1) PLANT OPERATIONS AND OPERATIONAL PREPAREDNESS AND 2) PRE 0PERATIONAL AND SURVEILLANCE lESTING WERE AGAIN RATED ASChTEGORY3, lliE OTHER FUNCTIONAL AREAS WERE RATED AS A CATEGORY 2. AT THE PLANT LEVEL THE PERFORPANCE OF THE LICENSEE WAS EVALUATED TO BE VARGI-NALLY ACCEPTABLE, DUE T0: FAILURE OF SENIOR PLANT PANAGER TO ACCOVPLISH PLANT ADJECTIVES WITHIN REGULATORY REQUIREENTS, INEXPERIENCE OF SITE FANAGER. ACCESSIVE PERSONNEL TURNOVER. FAILURE TO ESTABLISH REALISTIC SCHEDULES, a

                        ~                .

4 SALP 4 COVERED THE PERIOD SEPTEPBER 1,1982 - SEPTEMBER 30,1983,15 THE LATEST NRC EVALUAT.10N TllAT HAS BEEN PERFORMED OF lliE GRAND GULF FACILITY AtO MP&L- MANAGBM. THE RESULTS OF OUR EVALUATION OF milch Ft PRESEfGED TO THE LICENSEE IN A PUBLIC EETING HELD IN JACKSON, MS, ON JANUARY.19,1984, IS AS FOLLOW 5: CATEGORY 1 AREA EERGENCY PREPAREDNESS CATEGORY 2 AREAS RADIOLOGICAL C0hTROLS FIRE PROTECTION SECURITY AND SAFEGUARDS CATEGORY 3 AREAS PLANT OPERATIONS - VAINTENANCE SURTtlLLANCE

5 LICENSING /CTIVITIES

               -'      OUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM 1

OVERALL CONCLUSION OF THE LAST SALP COULD BE SUPT 1ARIZED AS FOLLOWS: VP8L HAS UNDERTAKEN A SIGNIFICANT IMPROVBW PROGRAM TO ENHANCE C0bi4JNICAT!0NS AND TECHNICAL EXCHANGE BETWEEN THE PLANT AND THE CORPORATE OFFICE DURING THIS PERIOD. THE ASSESSENT FOR THIS SALP KRIOD REFLECTS AN IFPLEENTATION PERIOD DURING WHICH COPPREHENSIVE IFFROVEMENT PROGRAMS WERE INSTITlHED BY PP&L TO CORRECTIVE SIGNIFICANT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED DURING THIS AND THE PREVIOUS SALP ASSESSENT PERIOD, THESE IPPLBMATION PROGRAMS HAVE SLOWLY RESULTED IN IMPROVBMS IN FANAGBM C0fRROL AfD THE TIELINESS OF CORRECTIVE-ACTIONS, VANAGBM CONTROL AS IT RELATES TO ADHERENCE TO PROCEDUIES AND INDEPlH ANALYSIS OF PLANT PROBLEFS NEEDS 1FPROVEEhT, THAT FPal FANAGBW PRESENT AT THE SITE HAS IFPROVED AfD TOP LEVEL MANAGEENT NOV DARTICIPATES IN A GREATER DEGREE AND DAY-TO-DAY ACTIV-ITIES AND THE RESOLUTION OF PROBLEMS AND TECHNICAL CONCERNS. 2

4

 ,                                ' SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURES            .                .

06/16/82 LOW POWER OPERATING LICENSE ISSUED 06/16/82 - 07/16/82 RII INSPECTIONS TO ENSURE LICENSEE'S COMPLIANCE WITH TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS (TS) AND ADHERENCE TO PRO-CEDURES (Surveillance Procedures do not verify com-pliance with TS.)

   *- 07/26/82               REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR MEETS WITH MP&L TO DISCUSS PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED WITH SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURES
      .08/18/82              INITIAL CRITICALITY - PHYSICS TESTING (Two surveillances not performed; periodic inspection of fire barrins and testing of SDV vent and drai.n valves.).

09/27/82 - 10/08/82 SPECIAL. TEAM INSPECTION ON SURVEILLANCE TEST PROCEDURES (Surveillance Procedures do not verify compliance with TS.) . 10/14/82 ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE CONCERNING SURVEILLANCE PRO-CEDURES AND TS 10/20/82 CONFIRMATION OF ACTION (C0A) ON SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURES AND TS 10/25/82 - 09/25/83 EXTENDED MAINTENANCE OUTAGE (Resolving deficiencies in Surveillance Procedures and TS.) 08/12/83 MANAGEMENT MEETING TO DISCUSS LICENSEE'S ACTION ON - COA of 10/20/82 08/15-19/83 NRC OPERATIONAL READINESS INSPECTION (Review of 08/30/83 - 09/01/83 COA 10/20/82 corrective actions and SRC's evaluation thereof) 09/23/83 CONFIRMATION OF CONCURRENCE (C0C) FOR RECRITICALITY (Specified followup actions in regards to Surveillance Procedures) 09/25/83 - 11/08/83 RECRITICALITY AND COMPLETION OF LOW POWER TESTING (<5%) 12/01/83 SUBMITTAL OF SURVEILLANCE REVIEW PROGRAM RESULTS (Required by COC 09/23/83) 02/21-24/84 SPECIAL TEAM INSPECTION COMPARING TS AND RELATED SUR-VEILLANCES TO INSTALLED HARDWARE (Determined that TS contain errors.)

   . ;ry 7/26/84

SUMMARY

O'F INSPECTI0s EFFORT AT' GRAND GULF'l'SINCE 1983 SALP REPORT (MP&L) Inspection Report No. Dates Areas Inspected Manhours 83-48 10/11-14/83 Structural concrete, coatings 24 83-49 10/5-7/83 Thermal expansion, leak rate 21 testing [SURV] 83-50 9/26/83-10/14/83 Operational safety, maint. obs., 121 surveillance obs., ESF syst, walkdown, etc. [0PS, MAINT, SURV) 83-51 10/24-27/83 Plant operations,. review of start- 23 . up tests, etc. [0PS] 83-52 10/17/83-11/15/83 Operational safety, maint. obs., 113 surveillance obs., ESF syst. walkdown, etc. [0PS, MAINT, SURV) 83-53 10/31/83-11/4/83 Training organization, evaluation 181 of licensed operators, other train-ing issues [0PS] 83-54 11/14-18/83 Security organization, program, etc. 30 83-55 9/1/82-9/30/83 SALP 83-56 11/16/83-12/13/83 Operational safety verification, 57 maint. obs., surveillance obs., TMI items, etc. [0PS, MAINT, SURV] 83-57' 10/31/83-11/4/83 Health physics 64 83-58 12/16/83-1/13/84 Operational safety verification, 71 maint. obs., surveillance obs., ESF syst. walkdown, etc. [0PS,MAINT,SURV) 84-01 1/16-20/84 QA activities, Part 21 regs. [QA] 108 84-02 1/16-20/84 Electrical preventive and 26 corrective maint. activities, maint. records and training of maint. personnel [MAINT] 84-03 1/16-17/84 Radioactive effluents (gaseous & 26 liquid), radwaste organization, modifications, procedures, audits, etc.

c: e' 4 fb

2 .

                     -Inspection Report No. Dates          Areas Inspected                    Manhours 84-04   1/30/84-2/2/84    Review of startup test procedures      32 and completed startup tests [0PS]

84-05 '1/16/84-2/15/84 Operational ' safety verification, 125 maint. obs., surveillance testing obs., procurement and storage, env. protection, security train-ing, Tech. Spbc. review, etc. [0PS,MAINT,SURV,LIC] 84-06 2/21-24/84 Verification of accuracy of Tech. 234 Specs. [LIC]- 84-07 2/16/84-3/9/84 Operation safety verif.ication, 40 maint. obs., surveillance obs., emergency drill obs. , etc. [0PS,MAINT,SURV] 84-08 4/9-12/84 Emergency preparedness exercise 189 84-09 4/9-13/84 Tests and experiments, QA program 125 review, non-licensed personnel training, audits, sury, testing and calib. control, etc. [SURV, QA] 84-10 4/11-12/84 Gas turbine generators, etc. 12 84-11 3/28-30/84 Obs. of Tech. Spec. Review Program 78 [LIC] 84-12 4/9-13/84 Shift advisor program [0PS] 50 84-13 4/30/84-5/4/84 Emergency Preparedness 70 84-14 4/29/84-5/3/84 Security Organization, personnel, 30 training, maint., physical barriers, alarms, etc. 84-15 4/30/84-5/4/84 RHR pipe crack [MAINT] 25 . 84-16 3/26/84-4/27/84 Operational safety verification, 151 maint obs., surveillance obs., ESF system walkdown, QA activi-ties, sury. audits, QA audit review, Nuclear Plant Engineering activity, etc. [0PS, MAINT, SURV, QA] 84-17 5/2-4/84 RHR pipe crack [MAINT) 53

       *                              .                                             }

7-

  .   --.J' ',ta 3

Inspection Report No. Dates Areas Inspected

    ,                        ,                                        ,  ,        Manhours 84-18    5/22-23/84      Plant flooding                           7 84-19    5/15-18/84      Piping activities, pre service          28 inspection,etc.[MAINT,SURV) 84-20  -5/14-18/84       Health physics                          36 84   6/25/84-7/13/84 Operational Safety Verification,        87 maint. obs., surveillance obs, ESF syst. walkdown, QA surveillance activities, et. [0PS,MAINT,SURV, QA]
                  .84-29     7/16-20/84      Review status of 1,1 cense conditions,   37     .

test procedures and results, etc. [LIC,SURV) l i i l l l-( ,

                   ..               +

( l EXPERIBICE REPORT REG.10fi..Il TPal VANAGDBU CAPABILITIES

                 -CORPORATE REORGANIZATION
                 -CORP 0PATE EXPERIENCE OF POER REACTORS
                 -REG, ADK. / MP&L If4TERACT10NS ASSESSMElT OF FACILITY PERFORVANCE
                 -PLANT FAliAGDBR CHANGES
                 -PLANT OPERATION DURING LOW POER TESTS
                 -tilNI SALP EVALUATION (SINCE 1/80
                         *1f6PECT10N O 200% BUDGET l                     .
                         ' PLANT OPERATIONS
                         % IhTENANCE

SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURES

                         '0UALIW ASSURANCE
                         *LICEf61NG ACTIVITIES
                         *0THER AREAS
                 -LER TREND
                 -VIOLATIONS TREND
                 -COPPLETION OF LICB4SE REQUIRDERS FOR LOW POWER TESTS -

OPERATOR QUALIFICATIONS

                 -LICENSED OPERATOR QUAllFICATIONS
                 -NON LICENSED TRAINING RHR PIPE CRACK EN RGENCY PREPAREDNESS RADIOLOGICAL AND SECURITY PREPAREDNESS REGION 11 CONCLUSI0fG
                                                 ~

L i i t-s s E ,

                                                            * *}}

ML20128H432

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search