ML20128F356
| ML20128F356 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05200001 |
| Issue date: | 02/03/1993 |
| From: | Fox J GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | Poslusny C Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9302110362 | |
| Download: ML20128F356 (10) | |
Text
. _ - ___
Y,.
I J'
a>,
GE Nuclear Energy
~
fi$ n.lNFt Ankk 5,n $t' () $b?O February 3,1993 Docket No. STN 52 001 -
Chet Poslusny, Senior Project Manager
. Standardization Project Directorate Associate Directorate for Advanced Reactors and License Renewal Office of the Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Subject:
Submittal Supporting Accelerated AhWR Reglew Schedule
Dear Chet:
Enclosed is a markup of Section 2.3, COL License Information, which addresses all of -
the DFSER Chapter 2 COL action items.
Sincerely, b
Jack Fox Advanced Reactor Programs l
cc: Sorayya Cook (GE)
- Norman Fletcher (DOE) mt 1000'71
- p h
9302110362 930203..
'PDR ADOCK:05200001
.A-PDR
,[
ABWR mamo Sinndard Plant Ittw. n v.
SECTION 2.3 CONTENTS Stetlott Title Eagt 23.1 Envelope of Standard Plant Desien Parameters
,23 1 2.3.1.1 Non Seismic Design Parameters 23-1 23.1.2 Seismic Design Parameters 23 1 2J.2 Standard He$lew Plan Site Characterigigt 23 1 23.2.1 Site Location and Description 23-2 23.2.2 Exclusion Area Authority and Control 23 2 23.23 Population Distribution 23 2 23.2.4 Identification d Potential llazards in l
Site Vicinity 2.3-2 23.2.5 Evaluation of Potential Accidents 23 2 skewa\\ 1 O % cn.eko
>RegionalClimadmy-23-2 23.2.6.
23.2.7 LocalMeteorology 23 2 23-2 23.2.8' Onsite Meteorologleal Measurements Program 23.2.9 Short Term Dispersion Estimates for Accidental Atmospheric Releases 23-2
'23.2.10 Long Term Diffusion Estimates _
23-2 23.2.11 Ilydrologic Description 23-2 23.2.12 Floods 23 2 23 113 Probable Maximum Flood on Streams and Rivers 23-2 23.2.14 Ice Effc:ts 2.M
-9.
23 il Amcodmsnt
-_-________w
ABWR muoaxo nov. n Etandatd Piant SECTION 2.3 CONTENTS (Continued)
Recilu lille Page 23.2.1$
Cooling Water Channels and Rer.crvoirs 23 2 23.2.16 Channel Dhision 23 3 2 3.2.17 floodinh Ptotection Requirements 23 3 23.2.18 Cooling Water Supply 2.3 3 2 3.2.19 Accidental Release of Liquid Efiluents in Ground and Surface Wsters 23-3 2 3.2.20 Technical Specifications and Emergency Operation Requirement 23 3 23.2.21 Basic Geological and Seismic Information 2.5 3 23.2.22 Vibratory Ground Motion 23 3 2.3.2.23 Surface Faulting 23-3 2 3.2.24 Stability of Subsurface Material and Foundation 23 3 23.2.25 Site and Facilities 23 3 23 3 2 3.2.06 Field Investigations 2 3.2.27 Laboratory Investigations 23 3 2 3.2.28 Subsurface Conditions 23-4 2 3.2.29 Excavation and Dackfilling for Foundation Construction 234 23.230 Groundwater Level 23 4 23.231 Liquefacation Potential 134 23.232 Response of Soil and Rock to Dynamic 1.cading 2.34 23.233 Maximum Soil Bearing Pressure 234 23.234 Earth Pressures 234 23-iii Amer.dtnent
._m
__..____..__._..._._._._.__m__________.______________m_________
ABWR ninero Sandard Plant at:v n SECTION 2.3 CONTENTS (Continued)
Sullna Illle Eage 23.235 Soil Properties for Scismic Analysis of Duried Pipes 23 4 2 3.2.36 Static and Dynamic Stability of Facilities 23-4 23.237 Subsurfare Instrumentation 23-5 23.238 Stability of Slopes 23-5 23.239 Embankments and Dams 23-5 233 QtAC 2 Computer Code Calculatlom 23-4 4
4 '
e 4
23-iv Amendment i
ABWR nuimru Standard Plant Rev D 2.3 COL LICENSE INFORMATION (1)
Design adequacy is established if floor response spectra are bounded by Section 3G.4 2.3.1 Envelope of Standard Plant Design spectra (or the actual spectra considered in Parameters design if applicable) at key locations. The site unique response spectra used for comparison 2.3.1.1 Non Seismic Design Parameters need not be broadened since uncertainties in the structural frequencies have been Compliance with the envelope of ABWR Standard accounted for in the smooth broadened site Plant site non seismic design parameters of Table envelope spectra.
2.0-1 shall be demonstrated for design bases events.
(See Subsection 2 2.1).
(2)
If nc,t, examine whether the deviations are at major resonant frequencies of the component 2.3.1.2 Selsmic Design Parameters under consideration. If not, design adequacy is confirmed. Otherwise, perform analysis To confirm the seistnic design adequacy of the and/or testing to demonstrate that the standard plant, COL applicants shall demonstrate acceptance criterla given in design that the eight (8) site dependent conditions specified specifications are met.
In Section 3A.1 are satisfied. In meeting these eight conditions, the compliance with the site envelope If the soil properties of the site vary very abruptly parameters shown in Table 2.01 for soil properties with depth (site dependent condition 7), a site and seismologyis also established, specific SSE SSI analysis is required. The evaluation procedures and acceptance criteria specified above if there is any deviation of the eight are applicable.
site-dependent ecoditions, a site specific evaluation is required. He type of evaluation will vary depending If the soll bearing espacity at the site is not on the deviation. If the deviation is for condition 1 adequate to accommodate the standard plant design (peak ground a:celeration),2 (ground response loads (site dependent condition 8), the foundation spectra), or 6 (shear wave velocity), a site specific material s util be removed and replaced with better.
SSE soil structure interaction analysis (SSI)is material to achieve the required bea. dog capacity.
required. The calculated site unique rt.sponses are Alternatively, the COL applicant may petform a site compared to the site envelope responses defined in specific analysis to demonstrate *%t the site has an Section 3G.4 to confirm the seismic design adequacy adequate bearing capacity against the site unique of the standard plant according to the following loads.
procedures and acceptance criteria.
The site dependent conditions 3 (liquefaction The Seismic Category I structures including the potential) and 4 (fault displacement potential)
RPV nnd its internal components that are included require site specific investigation.
In the SSI analysis model:
A site specific evaluation is required if the (1) Design adequacy is established if maximum embedment depths of Seismic Category I buildings structural responses in terms of force, moment, deviate from those from the standard plant design or acceleration are bounded by the Section 30.4 (site dependent condition 5). The evaluation responses (or the actual scismic loads considered procedure and acceptance criteria are the same as in design if applicable) at key locations.
those defined above for the site specific SSE SSI analysis.
(2)If not, calculate resulting SSE stresses. Design Y
l adequacy is confirmed if combined stresses due 2.3.2 Standard Review (vlagCharacterties to SSE and other appropriate loads are within i
l design code allowable limits.
Identification and description of all differences i
from SRP Section 11 Acceptance Criteria for site I or Seismic Category I equioment and piping characteristics (as augmented by Table 2.1 1) shall whose schmic input is in the form of floor response be provided. Where such differences exist, the spectra:
evaluation shall discuss how the alternate site characteristic is acceptabic. In addition, the COL l Arnendment 23 2.3-1
e ABWR nmow Stamiani Plant mn applicant will provide / address the following:
COL spplicants will provide the onsite 23.2.1 Site location and Description 2.3.2.9 Short Term Dispersion Estimates for COL applicants will provide site-specific Accidental Atmospheric Releases information to site location, including political subdivisions, natural and man made features, COL applicants will provide site specific population, highways, railways, waterways, and other short term dispersion estimates for NRC review to significant features of the area.
ensure that the envelope values (Tables 15.6 3, 15.6 7,15.613,15.614 and 15.618) of relative 233.2 Exclusion Area Authorily and Control concentrations are not exceeded.
COL appliennts will provide site specific 23.2.10 Lmtg Term Dl!Tusion Estimates
,-. P" Tg(',,%
a information related to activities that may be
,,m permitted within the designated exclusion area.
COL applicants will provide annual average 23.23 Population Distribution 23.2.11 Ilydrologic Description COL applicants will provide population data for the site environs.
COL applicants will provide a detailed description of all major hydrologic features on or in the vicinity 2.3.2.4 Identincation of Potuttal llazards in Site of the site. They will also provide a specific Vicinity description of the site and all safety related elevations, structures, exterior accesses, equipment, COL cpplicants will provide information with and systems from the standpoint of hydrology respect to industrial, military, and transportation considerations, facilities and routes to establish the presence and magnitude of potential external ha7ards.
2.3.2.12 Floods 23.2.5 Evaluullon of Potential Accidents COL applicants will provide site specitic information related to historical flooding and the COL applicants will identify potential accident potential Good:ng ut the plant site it.duding flood situations in the vicinity of the plant and the bases for history, flood design considerations, and effects of which these potential accidents were or were not locd intense precipit tion.
accommodated :n the design.
2J.2.6 Ilegionatellmdologyp c.k b g A c.< % ) Ivw I
233.13 Probable blaximum Flood on Streams and Rivers COL applicants will provide a review and COL applicants will provide site specific evaluation of the effects on the protection criteria of information related to detctmining design-basis some external impact hazards, such as general flooding at power reactor sites and the extent of avision or nearby explosions, flood protection required for those safety related systems, structures, and components.
2.3.2.7 tecal hieteorology 23.2.14 lee Effects COL applicants will provide local rnetcorology for NRC review COL applicants will demonstrate that safety-related facilities and water supply are not affected by ice Gooding or blockage.
23.2.8 Onsite hirteorological Measurements 23.2.11 Cooling Water Channels and Reservoire l
Program COL applicants will provide the basis for the hydraalie design of channels and reservoirs used to 2}2 Amendment
=
\\
,e 33A6t00AD w
ABWR Standard Plant _
~
23.2.23 Surface Faulting transport and impound plant cooling and for protection ci safety.related structures.
COL applicants will develop site specific geological data to ensure that no poteritial exists for 2J.2.16 Channst Division surface faulting at the site.
g COL applicants will provide site specific 23.2.24 Stability of Subsurface Material and l
information related to channel diversion.
Foundation 2J.2.17 Flooding Protection Requirement.
COL applicants will develop and submit to the NRC site specific geotechnical data to demonstrate COL applicants will provide site specific that they are comparable to the design assumptions.
information related to flooding protection concerning the soil. deposit depths, the soit profile requirements.
and properties, and the ground water level.
particular attention should be paid to the 2J.2.18 Cooling V,*aler Supply assumptions for the depth of embedment in the case of rock and the three cases of soil-deposit depths for COL applicants willidentify natural events thatwhich fixed values of depths are assumed. COL may reduce or limit the available cooling water applicants will demonstrate that the envelope of supply and ensure that an adequate water supply will structural response with fixed soit depth will(over exist to operrte or shutdown the plant as required.completely the cases for which the soil deposit depths and properties are different frorn those 2J.2.19 Accidental Release of Liquid Efiluents in assumed in the SSAR.
l Ground and Surface Waters 2J.2.25 Site and Facilities COL applicants will provide information on the
' ability of the surface water emironment to disperse,COL applicants will provide a detailed descri dilute, or concrottate accidental releases. Effects of of the sita conditions and geologic features and -
these releases on existing and known future use of
. demonstrate the site characteristics are enveloped by surface water / resources shall also be provided.
the DJg peak horizontal ground acceleration for the L
. SSE. The descriptionwillinclude site topographical
- 23.2.20 Technical Specifications and Emergency features and the location of various Seismic Ca
- Operation Requittment >
I structures and appurtenances (pipelines, channels, u
etc.) with respect to the source of normal and COL applicants willidentify the technical emergency cooling water.
specifications and emergency procedures required to l
23.2.26 Field investigations.
23.2.21 Basic Geological and Seismic Information The type, quantity, extent, and purpose of all field COL applicants will provide site.apecific exploration will be provided by COL applicants, information related to regional and site Logs of all borings and test pits should be provide physiography, geomorphology, stratigraphy, lithology Results of geophysical surveys shc.uld be presente and tecton!cs.
tables and profiles. Records of field plate load tests, field permeability tests, and other special field tests L
2J.2.22 Vibrntory Ground Motic,a,
(e.g., bore. hold extensometer or pressuremeter -
tests) should be given.
COL applicants will develop site specific,
geological, seismological, and geotechnical data and 2J.2J7 LaboratoryInvestigations l-will submit these data to the NRC for review. These data should be comparable to the design basis The number and type oflaboratory tests and the assuraptions regarding the SSE, including thelocation of samples should be prosided by the COL verification of the ground motion response spectra.
applicant in tabular form. The results of laborator tests on disturbed and undisturbest soil a 2M Amendment l
I ABWR m-n Sta111lnrd Plant new ti e
samples obtained from field investigations should cohesion and angle of internal friction, and dynamic also be provid d.
soil properties used in dynamic respome analysis, l 23.2.28 Subsurface Conditions 23.231 Llquefaction Potential COL applicants will investigate and define the COL applicants must demonstrate that no subsurface conditions and prmide the engineering liquefaction potential exists for soils under and classifications and descriptions of soil and rock around all Seismic Category I structures, including supporting the foundations. The information should Category I buried pipelines and electrical ducts, include the history of soil depo ition and crosion, COL applicants will justify the selection of the soil l past and present goundwater levels, glacial or other propertlet used in the liquefaction potential preloading influences, rock aveathering, and any rock evaluation (e.g., laboratory tests, field tests, and or soil (haracteristics that may present a hazard to published data), the magnitude and duration of the plant safe:y. Profiles through the Seismic Category I carthquake and the number of cycles of earthquakes.
l structures will be provided that show generalized subsurface features beneath these structures.
2.3.2.32 Response of Soil and llock to Dynamic l
Loading l 23.2.29 Excavation and Backfilling for roundation Construction COL applicants must establish and document site specific geotechnical properties to demonstrate COL applicants will provide site specific their comparability with the conditions used for the thickness and properties of soil (if any) between the seismic design envelope described in Appendix 3A.
base of the foundation and the underlying rock.The configuration, along with detailed longitudinal 23.233 Maximum Soll Hearing Pressure sections and cross sections of other safety.related structures of the plant, including the ultimate heat COL applicants will provide the site. specific sink and Seismic Category I buried pipes and elec.
maximum soil pressure along with supporting trical dacts, should be provided. COL applicants calculations and will compare them with allowable l will provide data concerning the extent (horizontally values.
and vertically) of all Seismic CateSory I excavations, fills, and slopes. The locations, elevations, and 23.234 Earth Pressures grades for excavated slopes should be described and -
shown on plot plans and typical cross-sections. COL COL applicants will provide a discussion and applicants'submittals should discuss, as appropriate, evaluation of static and dynamic lateral eatth excavating and dewatering methods, excavation pressures and hydrostatic groundwater pressures depths below grade, field inspection and testing of acting on plant facilities to the extent necessary to excavations, protection of foundation excavations demonstrate that these pressures meet the design from deterioration during construction, and the bases for the ABWR and to address all facilities foundation dental fill work. The sources, quantities, outside the ABWR scope.
and static and dynamic engineering properties of borrow materials will be described. The compaction 2.3.2.35 Soll Properties for Seismic Analysis of requirements; resuhs of test fdis, sad fill properties, Buried Pipes such as moisture content, density, permeability, compressibility, and gradation should be pronded.
COL applicants will provide and justify the soil properties used fro the seismic analysis of seismic l 2.3.230 Groundwaterlevel Category I buried pipes and electrical conduits.
COL applicants will analyze the goondwater > 2.3.236 static and Dpamic Stability of Fncilities -
condition for the specific site and demonstrate its comparability with the ABWR design assumptions.
COL applicants will analyze all safety related This demonstration should include the effect of the facilities to the extent necessary to demonstrate that actual groundwater level on such site geotechnical their stability meets the ABWR design bases and to properties as total and effective unit weights, address all plant facilities outside the ABWR scope.
These analyses may include foundation rebound, 2M Amendment
..-_.___.___.,__m___.
- i..
ABWR 23A m nA n
'[
Slalld[trd Plant kev. ii e
- settlement, differential settle:nent, and bearing capacity that will be addressed br design loads of fills and plant facilities. Assumptions made in stability analyses will be confirmed by ss built data.
2J.237 Subsurface Instrumentation Instrumentation, if any, proposed for the surve' *.ance of the performance of the foundations for afety-related structures will be described by COL applicants. The type, location, and purpose of each instrument and signiGcant details of installation methods will be provided For example, the location and the installation procedures for permanent benchmarks and markers required for monitoring the settlement of Category I structures should be described. In the case of safety related water control structures (such as dams, slopes, canals), the details of installing instrumentation such as pierometers, slope indicators, and settlement plates should be described. A schedule for inrtalling and reading all instruments and for interpreting the data will be presented. Limiting values for continued safety should be identined.
l 23.238 Stability of Slopes COL applicants will provide information about the static and dynamic stability of all soil and rock slopes, the failure of which could adversely affect the.
safety of the plant. The staff will evaluate the stability of all slopes at the site 4.using ther -
state of the art procedures available at the time of application.
l 2J.239 Embarkments and Dams COL applicants should provide information about the static and dynamic stability of all embankments and dams that impound water required for safe operation (and shutdown) of the ABWR for review by the NRC if embankments and dams are used.
2.3.3 CRAC 2 Computer Code Calculations L
Compliance with acceptance criteria, data input and analysis of Subsection 2.2.2 for the determination of ABWR site acceptability for severe accidents shall be demonstrated.
Arnendinent 2.3-3