ML20128F185

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Documents Licensing Position Re Groundwater Travel Time Requirements in 10CFR60.Extremes of Distribution of Possible Groundwater Travel Times in Determining Whether Performance Objective Met Excluded
ML20128F185
Person / Time
Issue date: 06/12/1985
From: Browning R
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
To: Stein R
ENERGY, DEPT. OF
References
REF-WM-1 NUDOCS 8507080155
Download: ML20128F185 (2)


Text

1 DISTRIBUTION WM Rxwj Tm yg p'.m,.

-j

. W s/f:

_ZC_f.J./-

n p5 '1985 - -

NMSS r/f V __

WMGT r/f

-MX/05/05/28/i :

UW REBrowning D A h _ ____ _ MBell

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~

HJMiller

{RgturqJa VM 623 33)

~'

MRKnapp & r/f Mr. Ralph Stein, Director

, g g g ~~ ~ ~ #7?

PDR

~

RCodell Engineering and Licensing Division FCameron, ELD Repository Projects Team JWolf, ELD NE-330 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20545

Dear Mr. Stein:

As you requested, this letter documents the licensing staff's position regarding the groundwater travel time requirement in 10 CFR Part 60.

As you know, 10 CFR Part 60.113(a)(2) reads:

The geologic repository shall be located so that pre-waste emplacement groundwater travel time along the fastest path of likely radionuclide travel from the disturbed zone to the accessible environment shall be at least 1000 years or such other time as may be approved or specified by the Commission.

In applying this part of the regulation, the staff considers that there is going to be a distribution of possible groundwater travel times. This distribution will result from uncertainty in our understanding of the geologic system, considerable uncertainty in measured parameters, such as porosity, permeability, and gradient, and tenporal variation in flow due to unusual storms, droughts, and the like. These phenomena are expected to cause the distribution of possible groundwater travel times to span as much as several orders of magnitude.

At the upper and lower limits of this distribution, there will be possible groundwater travel times which, although theoretically possible, are unlikely paths for radionuclide travel, and are therefore inappropriate measures for characterizing the geologic setting. The NRC therefore anticipates excluding the extremes of the distribution of possible groundwater travel times in determining whether the performance objective has been met.

The staff is currently drafting a technical position consistent with the above discussion, which I anticipate will be completed later this year.

8507080155 850612 PDR WASTE Wr1-1 PDR

)FC

WMGT
WMRP
WM
WM (AME :MRKnapp
HJMiller
MBell
RBrowning

) ATE :85/06/

85/06/
85/06/
85/06/

r 3

MK/85/05/28/1, uti 121985 j

I also note 10 CFR Part 60.113(b) which permits the Commission to approve or specify other groundwater travel times on a case-by-case basis, providing the overall system performance objective has been met. This provision is intended, in part, to ensure that an otherwise excellent repository site does not fail to be licensed on a technicality.

Sincerely, au.rj gd6:w.M Robert E. Browning, Director Division of Waste Management f

O ls g5 p

[L I

O k 6

.r M

WMRPyf'J

'$ WM l'

\\

['f.Y'G"'

I WM

)FC :

WMGT 4


 ::- RBr

3. F :

.----:------- ----:-------g.

MB'el (AME :

MKnapp:dw :

HMilre-ng :

85/0(/ f/

) ATE :85/05/ 3l 85/05/3\\ :

85/