ML20128C914

Forwards Communications Rept Transmittal 6 Re Phases 1 & 2 of Util Independent Assessment Program

ML20128C914
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	11/13/1984
From:	Oldag D CYGNA ENERGY SERVICES
To:	Ellis J Citizens Association for Sound Energy
References
NUDOCS 8505280449
Download: ML20128C914 (18)

Text

'

=-

101 Cahfornia Street Suite 1000, San Francisco, CA 941115894 415/397-5600 November 13, 1984 83090.022 Mrs. Juanita Ellis President, CASE 1426 S. Polk Dallas, Texas 75224

Subject:

Comunications Report Transmittal #6 Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station Independent Assessment Program - Phases 1 and 2 Texan Utilities Generating Company -

Job. No. 83090

Dear Mrs. Ellis:

Enclosed please find comunications reports associated with Phases 1 and 2 of the Independent Assessment Procam.

If you have any questions or desire to discuss any of these documents, please do not hesitate to call. .

Very truly yours, D..Oldag Administrati ssistant NHW/do Attachments cc: Mr. D. Wade (TUGCO) w/ attachments Mr.S.Treby(USNRC)w/ attachments Ms. J. Van Amerongen (TUGC0/EBASCO) w/ attachments Mr. D. Pigott (Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe) w/o attachments Mr. S.~ Burwell (USNRC) w/ attachments-

. gZh San Francisco Boston Chicago Richland 8505200449 DR 841113 ADOCK 05000445 PDR

Communications

~

uo i 111ll1811111111111111111111lll

. Report

• Telec n Texas Utilities 9 conference Repod Project: Job No.

83090 Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station

Independent Assessment Program - Phases 1 and 2 3/15/84 Subject Time

Fire Protection and Hardware Weights for Cable Traye 1:30 p.m.

CPSES site

Participants:

of Doug Hunt G&H D. Nandi G&H John Russ Cygna item Comments Ac r y I spoke to Doug and Mr. Nandi (both of Gibbs & Hill's Site Civil Group) to confirm the weights of fire protection insulation and cover plates, splice plates and tray-support attachment hardware as requested by Mr. Walsh. Doug told me that the site hazards group is responsible for determining which cable trays will require fire protection. This information is prepared by Mr. Jeff Spiegleman of TUGC0 and sent by memorandum (CPPA) to the Civil Group for evaluation of effects due to any additional

- wei ght. This evaluation is performed by adding the additional weight into the existing cable tray weight and comparing the total value to the design weight of 35 PSF.

I gave Doug a copy of the RHR tray segments. To expedite our response to Mr. Walsh's question, I asked Doug to provide the following information:

1. Tray segment unit weight for the size of each tray segment. Gibbs & Hill

2. Cable fill weight per tray segment. Gibbs & Hill 3, Weight of insulation per tray segment. Gibbs & Hill

4. If any tray cover and if so, its unit weight. Gibbs & Hill

5. The combined weight of items 1 through 4 Gibbs & Hill omtribution-Yff)] gh ljw 1

'N. Williams, D. Wade, J. Russ, J. Van Amerongen, J. Ellis, S. Burwell, S. Treby, 2

, ,, r i vseu iie

'i - ' -

Communications 4L t i Report 111lll11111lll11lll11111111111 item comments [e7e*EYy

6. Weight of splice (" doubler") plates for the size of each tray segment. Gibbs & Hill

7. Weight of the tray attachment clips and bolts for each attachment. Gibbs & Hill e

i' l

t i

Page g of g to20 0in

._...._-__-.-~_--_.-___.___;._. -

. -.n,-- . - - . - - _ _ . . - . . . _ . - . . - . . . . _ . . ._ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ .

Communications

4( t i Repod 11111111111llllllll11111111111 Telee n g Conference Rem

. Texas Utilities Project Job No.

83090 Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station '**

1 Independent Assessment Program - Phases 1 and 2 3/16/84 Subject Time:

4:00 p.m.

Memoranda for Fire Protected Cable Trays p CPSES Site

Participants:

of Sara Donald Brown & Root John Russ Cvona Required item Comments Action By Ref. Conference report of March 15,1984, " Memoranda for Fire Protected Cable Trays," S. Donald and J. Russ participating.

In response to the document request of reference conference report, Sarah gave me copies of the memoranda (CPPA's) listed on the attached sheet.

l l

i l

l l

Signed: Page of V[JJ flbJ[dM.X3

/jw 1 1 D'St"but' ": N. Wil'liams,'D. Wade, J. Russ. J. VanAmerongen, S. Treby, S. Burwell, J. Ellis, ma n,. Project rise

~~  ! .

'derwso  %  ;

' & se Spa u esAr!

/[ mop 4 '89-

'{[ ...

TFHA FIRE BARRIER PE.W LOG

• BUILD. 1 ELEV. FIRE 20NE PENV ORAWING f CPPA #

.SG - 873 178 1. 30.117 . 21.082 17C 2 i

21F 4 25,883 . 25,432 ,

! A8 - 852 23.716 , 22.096 i

~

33,137 35,616 SG - 852 . 18 5 30,182 , 30.118 ,

17A 6 26,005 33,136 34,961 36,628 t

t 24,362 , 22,345

(. e ,

AB - 831 21D 10 35,620 1

i 15 7 26,763 , 26,731 ,

l- SG - 831 26,014 16 8 l

144 9 35,147 AB - 790 21A 12 26.588 I

I 35,694 SG - 790 4C 13 26.706 1C & 2C 14 35,359 i

218. C, & 31 15 29,835 l A8 - 810 35,832 8 20 30,104 i SG - 810 9 21 142 & 143 22 35,'171

[ j.

[. Q '

31,636 , 30,510 EC - 778 153 17 43, 47, & 57 18 i 35,547 L

I (Original)

I

• • (Update)

Communications i AL '

t i Report mm:: ::::.

i

• ""# Teiec n 9 conference Repon Texas Utilities Project: Job No. -

Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station 83090

Independent' Assessment Program - Phases 1 and 2 3/16/84 M

Subject:

Time:

3 Fire Protection and Hardware Weights for Cable Trav, 3:30 p.m. T' Place:

CPSES Site

Participants:

of D. Nandi Gibbs & Hill ai isilii Doug Hunt Gibbs & Hill <~

John Russ Cygna a 1

b Required 5 Item Comments Action By E--

Ref: Conference report of March 15,1984, " Fire Protection and

. Hardware Weights for Cable Trays," D. Hunt, D. Nandi and T J. Russ, participating. 5 In response to the questions in the referenced conference report, -

Mr. Nandi gave me the attached sheets, marked Al to A10. The -

information on sheets Al to A9 is a summary of data from Binder _;

2323-E2-1700, Issue 322, as noted on each sheet. The information s on sheet A10 is taken from manufacturers' catalogs, or as _[

noted. Mr. Nandi told me that the weights of the splice plates 3 and bolts used in the tray connections are included in the tray '=

weight. He also stated that "z" clips and friction clips are normal connections of the tray to the supports. Heavy duty =g clamps are used at a support if a tray joint occurs there.

Doug told me that cover plates are not used at Comanche Peak because the insulating material used is rigid. The cable tray is I not used to support the weight of the insulation. M

=

1 i

5 4

x E

Signe Page of

) ] j, 1 I i

~

Distnbution:' 'N'. Wil'liams", J. Russ7D. Wade, J. VanAmerongen, S. Treby, S. Burwell, J. Ellis,

, , , , r i va cu Tiic. [+

A1TACloEVr 2

'~ _

CABLE TRAY THERMOLAG EVALUATION FORM ~

11 ..*-

r 1 ( =. ..

1. DATE:

j . 2. REFERENCE DRAWINGS: (1) SK. TFHA.

(2) Electrical s s J -s s. 7s a -# i 8ev. 3

~

a (3) Structural rssu e 2s2. _

w a.s - ss- e? o o

. p (4) Other . s c. . .

9.

(1) Bullding: 4A F E 4

• A s.Dd

3. LOCATION:

. (2) Elevation: o n' - 6" .

80 5

. . (3). Room No:

(4) Tray No: 7##6eA8

'l 4.(a) EVALUATION AS PE,R SECTION 3-2-2-1:

WT. OF DESIGN SELF WT. WT. OF REMARKS CABLES TOTAL LOAD TRAY SIZE OF TRAY.He FIRE BARRIER SEGMENT NO.

(TABLE 1) (El-1700) WT. (TABLE 1)

(TABLE 1) "

{. it .a" Nt 2 s.6* N io s.o

• Nt 27 3 s t,' = 4" it "Nt 8 to r. s /ft t s* lft ~t6 8 8 kt 28 6

%6 4t 4" -

2t,---

24.0 8' ro c. o*#t

s. s s s 4 4" is*Hf i s . t. * #t

,. r. o*ks w" 4' es* #4 4.s#lh i t..s* Mi to /6.d aHe 2738W g 7.f8 /4 23 g o s 4 1 so.f8Mf 87.r*Nt se' s. 4" is r*8f id . 3 * // f 93//s. 8 13 16. 6

• 27. ) 4 87.r s

2. 4 s e* + 4 ' 10 7 n _

s Ib.S *s 37 3 'll 8 7.s- *I 2r Se"+ 4" s o ..r 's

4. (b) Evaluation as per section 3-2-2'.2 or 3-2-2.3.

Attach calculations and reference CMC and/or DCA No. in Remarks column.

5. APPROVAL SIGNATURES:

Q SHecT O i Electrical Engineering:

Civil /St'ructural Engineering:

Civil / Structural Check:

Civil / Structural Review:

~.-

0 5* -

rsIG !A 8 'lJ" To #G!'tG \b

' LENGvd ap ' T R A'f .. f t o p.f = 44+

( r n r e,6, ,, s s .re T'is o rd s r)

Lewavy es ve4y s o le u *: rnsras ss -

re Tns eses ss

's n ra ris4 e d6 18 - g (t-

' 't n v senpag 33 st '8 T ot G e n s s p To 1* s G F A6 E s = le St.

2 ' ' I 8' t sl of of

' ' u ,, T 4 pse s 3 2. 18 744 e A o 5 3 et as = 8 f t.

.s **

• se r so G r A s 13 To fon 4r n s s */

a n r n se A e 14 ro ror c r e a 1,.s-  :. 1/t

.* n ,

~ . . . . . . . . . _

.--..=- -

~

v. _ - - ,-.

f[

o g,,.g g. 2 1 I .- ,

CABLE TRAY THERM 0 LAG EVALUATION FORM .

]

I .

g - .

i { ') - .. J

< ~1. DATE: f

. 2. ~ REFERENCE DRAWINGS: ' (1) SK. TFHA.  !

(2) Electrical 2 3 23 - a t- . de2 - # # Aw.2 (3) Structural 2 3 C3 - El- ! 788 /5 f W e .3 21.-

(4) Other /3 54 ,te.;

i (1) Building: 6Arat.onaos ,

3. LOCATION:

(2) Elevation: o a s' i' ,

' o8 PJo d y -

. (3). Room No: ,

~

- (4) Tray No: T ttc.,s A e T

4.(a) EVALUATION AS PE,R SECTION 3-2-2-1:

WT. 0F DESIGN SELF WT. WT. OF REMARKS CABLES- TOTAL LOAD TRAY SIZE OF TRAY FIRE BARRIER SEGMENT NO. (El-1700) WT. (TABLE 1)

(TABLE 1) (TABLE 1) v.r ah. z,.,

• he i t. . a r s s*4 i.*Re 4+ tAs a

t de Evaluation as per section 3-2-2.2 or 3-2-2.3.

4.(b)

Attach calculations and reference CMC and/or DCA No. in Remarks column.

5. APPROVAL SIGNATURES:

SHEtr A 1.

Electrical Engineering:

C6vil/ Structural Engineering:

7 Civil / Structural Check:

Civil / Structural Review: ,

(

c- 3441.

0F rany Fsem Tot ces A s 4 4 To T II cos A o <

L e u 6 ry

/

, 7 5-- .'..? _f ,~__ ~ _. ~ . % -

g _

_a ATTACloENr 2 k .. .. .

C'ABLE TRAY THERMOLAG EVALUATION FORM -

k# .

L 1. DATE:

(1) SK. TFHA.

2. REFERENCE DRAWINGS:

(2) Electrical _ 2 3 T2 -E/- (**'n -11 #W 3 ,

(3) Structural

1. 1. # " " 3**

ES 2 ~ 8 '7 88 (4) Other fj . W - 14. >

(1) Suilding: 6AFs4usea M _

3.. LOCATION:

(2) Elevation: 61 * '- 4 "

i 100

. (3) Room No:

(4) Tray No: 7Ir4sA8 4.(a) EVALUATION AS PE,R SECTION 3-2-2-1:

WT. OF DESIGN SELF WT. WT. OF LOAD e)/t REMARKS CABLES elft TOTA

^

TRAY SIZE OF TRAYa#t FIRE BARRIER WT.* It (TABLE 1)

SEGMENT NO.

(TABLE 1) (TABLE 1) (El-1700)

Is.6 t c, . s ia 4C 14's/ 9.c s s. s .> '>>

4c s4"s4' 9.T is.A m is 24*s4* 9.C 41 I68 11 3 61.C de 1 ** A 4' le s- ** ')

it. B 49 M* s 4

• Io.r 84 98 9. ')

.C~0 - ss" s N' r e . E' 4._(b)

Evaluation as per section 3-2-2.2 or 3-2-2.3.

Attach calculations and reference CMC and/or DCA No. in Remarks column.

~

y S. APPROVAL SIGNATURES: -SH ear A 3 ,

Electrical Engineering:

~

Civil / Structural Engineering:

Civil / Structural Check:

' Civil / Structural Review: 8 = 80h T* s e 4.s n a */g To T **

fe e M l* I% o i t

( { gary a p r u oe y - 4 I,  !!

,, ,, os so -46 s IG.0 h g >> 4y ss

~ ,,

>> .s as

- 4g >> -43 s 4 0 4t so os .s

- se s 9,o .[j

" - 43 2 3

'8

[ o 41

, .i

>> - El ;-

• • ** * - to *)

*)

A ,- . __ _ _ , _

• ~~ m.- _

c _

- ATTACloIENr 2 CABLE TRAY THERMOLAG EVALUATION FORM

'([ * - . . , .

1. DATE:

2. REFERENCE DRAWINGS: (1) SK. TFHA.

(2) Electrical r s. o'6e 2 -il 9ev. I

' l

. (3) Structural 2 3 s s -s #- #7oo /.r.s y e 3 ts (4) Other P3 . M -I 4. I'

3. LOCATION: (1) Building: $AFa 4 OAAD$-/_

8io 8- (,'

(2) Elevation:

(3) Room No: 77 488.74

~(4) Tray No: r it 4 s A o i -4.(a) EVALUATION AS PER SECTION 3-2-2-1:

WT. OF WT. OF DESIGN

' SELF WT. REMARKS FIRE BARRIER CABLES TOTAL LOAD

-SEGMENT N0. TRAY SIZE OF TRAY 1

(TABLE 1) (TABLE 1) (El-1700) WT. (TABLE 1)

(.

et 14% 4" 9.E*lh IG*6*Ih u.n*Nt To _.

~

f

4. (b) Evaluation as per section 3-2-2.2 or 3-2-2.3.

Attach calculations and reference CMC and/or DCA No in Remarks column. _L

5. APPROVAL SIGNATURES: [SHErf A+[ ,

[

Electrical Engineering:

v-Civ11/ Structural Engineering:

Civil / Structural Check:

p

'~ CiVi1/ Structural Revfew:

( .

If $1 -

fde 64 T*lI 4 $ A B 0 7 To Tti4Z AS^l*/ ~

l tM GTH O f~ T* A f

(

p h

L

• ~ ~ - - --- - - - . - - . _ . _

~

n - - - - - .

3

• • I' .

,YlTAG NIWT 2 e-CABLE TRAY THERMOLAG EVALUATION FORM i -

p, .

1. DATE:

2. REFERENCE DRAWINGS: (1) SK. TFHA. gs.eees - 11 44v.3 s3 a.3 (2) Electrical 2 3 1.2 - a t o 6ae- /2. # e V. 2.

~

(3) Structural ___

(4) Other 2 '5 1 3 - f I- 17e o Ass ue 3 12, PS. 10- 84.1

3. LOCATION: (1) Building: SA F E 40 A rFSis

' (2) Elevation: -Iris'-4 '.

(3) Room No:

" (4) Tray No: 1 is o s 4 a 4.(a) EVALUATION AS PER SECTION 3-2-2-1:

SELF WT. WT. OF WT. OF DESIGN FIRE BARRIER CABLES TOTAL LOAD REMARKS SEGMENT NO. TRAY SIZE OF TRAY (TABLE 1) (TABLE 1) (El-1700) WT. (TABLE 1)

Rt

{- 1 at,o+4

. s 9 5 l4r iG.6 10 3aIk 7e"Nt t

i sns.tt-0M nu.

o1 ~ 8) ~ - -

- -- , } . - . g q #i g 9 s q /4 -

g,g [N' -~ - ~18 #//f I er s v"y ga * #t z. 6 sss*/h 3

• Nt ** " - "' 't j.'s

+

l 1.

ll b 4.(b) Evaluation as per section 3-2-2.2 or 3-2-2.3. -

! Attach calculations and reference CMC and/or DCA No. in Remarks column.

L 5. APPROVAL SIGNATURES: [s4 err A 5 j Electrical Engineering:

s n Civil / Structural Engineering:

[

f; Civil / Structural Check:

$ Civil / Structural Review: ,

n 7p A y LauGTH. A s.o M TilGsag o3 To T il 4 5 4 G 8 Y ::. f f**

>> >> of T n 4.s A B 03 'ro TII Gs A s a 6 to it .

MTACIDIENT 2 CABLE TRAY THERMOLTG EVALUATION FORM

1. DATE:

. 2. REFERENCE DRAWINGS: (1) SK. TFHA.

(2) Eleckrical  : s s's - a t- e s ei- i een.3' -

(3) Strql}tural (4) Other 1.4 s2-es.svos is s u e 2 1.2 P3 . S e ~

• l G . I

'(1) Building: 6 A F F 40 #44 DJ -/

3. LOCATION:

(2) Elevation: 7 9 e 8. 6

(3) Room No:

(4) Tray No: T 11 f s A G 4.(a) EVALUATION AS PER SECTION 3-2-2-1:

WT. OF DESIGN SELF WT. WT. OF CABLESe#t TOTAL,, LOAD a/4 REMARKS TRAY SIZE OF TRAYa#v FIRE BARRIER SEGMENT NO.

(TABLE 1)* Kt (El-1700) WT.*Nt (TABLE'1)

' (TABLE 1)

( IL. 8 10 ol s. 4

• s d' 9.c 16 8 7e _ _ .

et o 9. r

4. (b) Evaluation as per section 3-2-2.2 or 3-2-2.3.

Attach calculations and reference CMC and/or l DCA No. in Remarks column.

I

! 5. APPROVAL SIGNATURES:

{SW h 6 1

Electrical Engineering:

s.

i Civil / Structural Engineering:

Civil / Structural Check:

Civil / Structural Review: . .

To TII G A A G a t : 1. sj 4t Yll 45 AS of N L t H GT H of Tany Fo o *4 Til G s A S al J) 71142 n8 c) s. L1 4 t.

0F 78Af a)

L.Eassy T It 4 3 A c o 2 ) T* tI 4 3 A s a 3 .- I1 41.

I) ) >>

ri

-:.=,=-=.,  ; . . _ . _ _ _ _

~

- ATTAODEVr 2 .

CABLE TRAY THERMOLAG EVALUATION FORM

(- -

~

1. DATE:

l

2. REFERENCE DRAWINGS: (1) . SK. TFHA.

l (2) Electrical E l- O b oo - It Avy 3 _

. (3) Structural **

• * * * ~ I '~ # 7 8 0 """

(4) Other f* g %4 - l G 1

3. LOCATION:

(1) Building: $ 4 F E 4'u A& DJ _/ .

• (2) Elevation: 7 7 3 '- 4

(3) Room No:

(4) Tray No: T ll 4 55

4. (a) EVALUATION AS PER SECTION 3-2-2-1:

WT. OF DESIGN SELF WT. WT. OF REMARKS CABLES TOTAL LOAD TRAY SIZE OF TRAY FIRE BARRIER SEGMENT NO. (El-1700) WT. (TABLE 1)

(TABLE 1) (TABLE 1)

( $N d *IW

&

• ISt 4 1* Nt (*

co j i 1."

• 4 " 3r #lh G #fft

~4J.i'#f/t- lo.4 ae A 15" t 4 '

1 4.(b) Evaluation as per section 3-2-2.2 or 3-2-2.3.

Attach calculations and reference CMC and/or DCA No. in Remarks column.

[Seeirf' A "? ,

5. APPROVAL SIGNATURES:

~ Electrical Engineerir.c:

Civil / Structural Engineering:

Civil / Structural Check: .

Civil /Strectural' Review:

~

(.

T*A1 M MGTH paoq r g; gl'$ G 007 To TIIG.C F 0 06 - +h 4

-@. ' ' * * * * * *** mwee mw S.omome,n em n m e. _ , , , ,, Q y , _ _

6

.* i ATTACINENT 2 CABLE TRAY THERMOLAG EVALUATION FORM-

~-

-( * ,

i o- l 1.. DATE: .

i

.2. REFERENCE DRAWINGS: (1) SK. TFHA.

EI- o sos - tu Rev. 3 (2) Electrical

~

E l- e 6 oo - # 2- Pev. a - ,

.(3) Structural 13 &2 . E1- 170 0 /88u e 31s (4) Other r3 . u - 8 9. t (1) Building: 3 4 r a e,o e a of_.)

3. LOCATION:

7 7J '- 4

. (2)* Elevation:

(3) Room No: "

(4) Tray No: Til d> s A fl.

4.(a) EVALUATION AS PER SECTION 3-2-2-1:

WT. OF DESIGN SELF WT. WT. OF CABLES # ht TOTAL LOAD 4 //f REMARKS TRAY SIZE OF TRAY. M FIRE BARRIER WT?M (TABLE 1) i SEGNENT NO.

(TABLE 1) (TABLE 1) (El-1700)

(' 84 6 sta a 7e tA Lst"t.s/' 45 ~76

^ ~ T4 6 ss'. *V

s. 9 s 4 " s. el" 9.C

( 11 4 21 t 7e y s.4" s.4* 9. s~

~

l l ,

4.(b) Evaluation as per section 3-2-2.2 or 3-2-2.3.

i

(

Attach calculations and reference CMC and/or DCA No. in Remarks column. i l

e sHerr A 8 l ,

! 5. APPROVAL SIGNATURES:

i Electrical Engineering:

i Civil / Structural Engineering:

4 Civil / Structural Check: ,

Civil / Structural' Review:

f. (

To Tot $3 A A 2 f = S fl y e st a r el Feo bs T it $ s s9s4 1 6 reAy  !! -3) .

f/s l si so ir i

l

' ~ " ~ ~

~ ' . ' .i.' -_ __ __, .

• '..-- -.._, "..- ~~ '~' ~- " * ~ ~ ' ~ .

~l

~

ATTACIDENr 2

~

- + .

CABLE TRAY THERMOLAG EVALUATION FORM

.(

1.. DATE:

1

2. REFERENCE DRAWINGS: (1) SK. TFHA.

(2) Electrical 2 3 2'3 - E l - ( of - I l Rev .9

. . (3) Structural .

(4) Other 2.2 "As - a r . 17o 0 is s u , ~3 A 2

/g . S o - I @ . I (1) Building: 6 A F E 4 o g.g D S- f

3. LOCATION:

(2) Elevation: 7 9 o '- 4

(3) Room No: .

(4) Tray No: T#l $ 5 A A

4. (a) EVALUATION AS PER SECTION 3-2-2-1: O SELF WT. WT. OF WT. OF DESIGN OF TRAYS 4 FIRE BARRIER CABLES #l0 TOTAL LOAD $6e REMARKS SEGMENT N0. TRAY SIZE (TABLE 1) (TAP,LE.1)elh (El-1700) WT .' A (TABLE 1)

( '

• 1 *b 1 63

• 4' i ' I' IO*6 16 2 70 _ . . .

2 4"d 4## T. 5" /6. 8 s.te. S 70

• • /

t5 t si "

• 4 " 9E #4' 8. 1s.s -1 0

~

f lo . 8 14.s 7e Z ie 2.si" i t/ 4 e 5" 1 *7 L ad < =#' 9. &~ J4 8 16 3 70 4

4. (b) Evaluation as per section 3-2-2.2 or 3-2-2.3. - -

Attach calculations and reference CMC and/or DCA No. in Remarks column.

[ sneer M ' ,

5. APPROVAL SIGNATURES:

Electrical Engineering:

Civil / Structural Engineering:

Civil / Structural check:

Civil / Structural Review:

i-fneM Tit $$ A A-2 3 To TilpsAA s4 ,. 2 q (g ,

TJt A f LEHGTH nr y 4t o> >> os

>> -11 *> *> ,

U -2L *D >> - 1=y a C"f t

>> op oy ss - 18 t il dt n a) ,j sl -17 ss t

~ - - - ~~ -

~ . _ _ . , , . .

_. __m__ _ _ _ _ _

o 1 .-'

ICRM DHE-5 i

TEXAS UTIUTIES SEAVEES INC. "

! COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

Asses For . 8mi's Mr

()

am DAU.AS POWER & UGHT COMPANY ['!

i 8"' "* C' '

cus er TEXAS ELECTRIC SERVICE COMPANY TEXASPO W & M N W , , , , , , , .

snaps w o= sin m.Na f

d 1 - f -

in w r - > _ cu- m

• s r -

h <h- si- MPet TJ , ".--

• d7 [4ec# h 9

/ /

r _

s L

.us 2 sp =

t % n C Nsf Tn,A s n = CC fa t"+ _

/

1 bd.'WP n __4)_ gr ec Fe; c. rimy 17or <- rso gup. _

• 7 dcWh.. '

i ,

n JCa a_ 4 s4- Te,w p

- **?L $tt - . _$l.Y

__ e i

'd __ f/dsb A 49 " *b M

., r ~ r ,

n L 1 o

k-l g -@ wp,umeryy :% <ww , , -

T -

a, h ew e A ,, a ,x, i' = 3.s w p1smA _

? _._ __ __

.. . . . _ _ _ . . _ ...  % .n_ _ . f; _4 . . . ... . .

. _ , , . ~

'Clfis'_&, . _{

. . ._... ' ~~

h

~r k_. C_Q,

. rp -k .

y d-( .:. Ke hh n

, d E

b

$EevJw.m N

_h' G.a c.s. @ .

[

MW  % W #

L cfwepp,}(~W'% 5 ndM7~5 M - =

'T =

u_tas_dwe 4, 4, . .,-

a 9_,'

i lJY.--fMW d)'_

f~; L = (,,, ,AtreL TAs y 3 Mot >E #

$* O & Q J) l-l

")

'f' b

s b _[M. y l >7nlE*eN fes- G WirL k: s C v/ w ;~ } .$

..k_

l .. _=

\

~

( 3 i J 4 l== ' Y- . , . 1 7.;ur( =b } p ' *..

i f wn_ a_ fflf 4 = <

f_.)givey w ,

e g m,_ .(,_ _em _ ___. _

Wsan on ut%%.r1- = n

- .J ? . _ _ .nlZ-DE.BanL ___

__ _ _ _-. _ - .+ - . .. -

N h0 hS W N HtW N &WVth'$ &VO,Y as b ,,,,

~ .d Y

n. wm ~? /  ;

• j g --

g F w'

~ .

=!

b i i t i S HEST A10 e E

~

1 a _ .._....._1..._.

. Communications

, 4L i i .

Repod 11111111111lll111111lllllllll1 company: Texas Utilities Teiec n a conference Report Project Job No.

83090 Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station

Independent Assessment Program - Phases 1 and 2 6/11/84 Subject Time:

DCC Satellite Reviews 10:40 Place:

CPSES

Participants:

of S. Bibo. D. Smediev. J. Laurie. A. Jones. Cyana J. Waal . S. Sidhu C. Boyd, Gray, J. Tate. P. Well s. TUSI S. Brown. S. Bruce Required item Comments Action By At 10:40 AM, S. Bibo asked C. Boyd to escort Cygna personnel to each satellite and to introduce each Cygna reviewer to each DCC satellite supervisor. Chris agreed to personally walk us to each location. This was done as follows:

10:50 AM - S. Sidhu and J. Waal introduced to Jim Tate (Satellite Supervisor) - Began review.

10:55 AM - J. Laurie introduced to Phyllis Wells (Satellite 306 Supervisor) - began review.

11:02 AM - D. Smedley introduced to Sandy Bruce (Satellite 307/308 Supervisor) - Began review.

11:06 AM - A. Jones introduced to Suzie Brown (Satellite 300/301 Supervisor) 11:30 AM - Chris Boyd explained to S. Bibo that if a package was in a satellite file, it may not necessarily be up-to-date. I asked Chris to explain. Chris stated that if, for example, drawing X-1 had not been signed out of a satellite for a few days, it was possible that there could be some recently issued design changes missing from the package. I asked him to explain how he was sure that the craft got the correct information. ]

He explained that when a package or drawing is requested from a satellite, the first step is to call up on the computer and ask for the latest issue (revision) of the drawing and for all open l design changes. The satellite then has the computer print out '

this list and assure all the listed design changes are issued within the drawing.

He stated that for the electrical and mechanical craft satellites, the packages are updated daily, but for other i satellites, they are updated only when a drawing is requested. l l

l of signed: U/ Page N. Williams, D. Wade, . VanAmerongen, S. Bibo, D. Smedley, S. Treby, J. Eilis, ProjectFile -.

L.. _ :_

, t.

, e Mi i Communications i ,

j' '

Report

- imma -

• P8"Y Conference Report Texas Milities 9 Telec n Project Job No.

Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station 83090 Date:

Independent Assessment Prooram - Phase 2 9/94/RA _

Subject Time:

DCA 12653, Revisions 13 and 14 10:15 AM PST _

Place:

Cygna

Participants:

of Kay Norman TUGC0 D. Smedley Cyana Required item Comments Action By

1) Cygna asked K. Norman to identify on what date DCA 12653 Rev.14 was input onto the DCC log. Her answer was 6/11/84.

l I

l l

s'e"* v(gjjj,y ** *

Distribution:

N[' Williams,D. Wade,J.VanAmerongen,R.Hess,D.Smedley,S.Treby,J.Ellis, L mo o'. S. Burwelln Pro 2xst Fil@