ML20128C568
| ML20128C568 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Monticello  |
| Issue date: | 03/21/1972 |
| From: | Reid R US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9212040472 | |
| Download: ML20128C568 (3) | |
Text
,
.. _ -.. ~.
9.
l' R=
4 UNITED STATES N
ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION hk W ASHINGTON. O.C. 20545
- )L ) f j
%n 1
i
)
w Files (D et No.
0-263) i THRU:
D. L. Zi nn, Chief, ORB #2, DRL i
MEETING WITH NORTHERN STATES POWER (NSP) - FULL-TERM OPERATING LICENSE l
APPLICATION - MONTICELLO Representatives of DRL, DRS, Compliance, OGC, Northern States Power j
and Nuclear Utility Services met at Bethesda, Maryland, on March 21, 1972, at NSP's request to discuss the content -and schedule of the j
planned application for a full-term operating license (FTOL) for the Monticello reactor.
A list of the attendees is attached.
Nuclear Utilities Services is assisting NSP in the preparation of the material l
for the application, a
Whether or not items involving backfitting for BWRs should be included l
in the FIOL was discussed but not resolved.
This question was to l
be discussed-further at a subsequent meeting of AEC and NSP legal
. representa tives.
The itemt identified in this category were hydrogen control following a LOCA, worus baffles - relief valve blowdown, ECCS 4
interim criteria analysis, rod drop' analysis - rod worth minimizer,-
j HPCI reliability, and gaseous radwaste processing.
The liklihood of an ACRS review of the FTOL application and the im-i pact on the schedule was noted.
l Several items to be included in the FIOL application related to the performance of the utility were identified. These are safety com-l mittee effectiveness, management performance, proposed personnel ad-ditions, and industrial security.
A number of items related'to the performance of the facility were identified which should be included in the FTOL application. These are (1) HPCI' reliability improvements, (2) modifications--.of steamline flowneters, (3) main steamline isolation valve reset switch, (4) steam-l line flow restrictors,- (5) torus baf fle removal - blowdown charac-l j
teristics,- (6) observed reactivity. anomalies,- (7) rod drop accident
- rod worth minimizer, and (8) hydrogen control ~ af ter a LOCA.
i
)
d In those cases where material has been submitted to DRL' on the above l
items, the: submission for the FIOL application can be a summarization and referencing of the previous submittals.
9212040472 720321-PDR ADOCK 05000263 P..
PDR f
=
s r.
v s--
u-e--,t
,-,---n.
. ~,., - - -.~, - m an
,.,-,cr,,-wwo-w., e re v w w..
-r-.m,
-r,-
ew,,.
,-.mm
-w
..i s
Files a It was tentatively concluded that if necessary to meet the desired schedule, the revisions to the Technical Specifications need not be submitted with the FTOL application, but that the revisions should These be ready for issuance prior to the time the license is issued.
same scheduling considerations will apply to the submittal of the quality assurance program for the operation of the facility.
q j
. c. k I. %.-d R. W. Reid Operating Reactors Branch #2 Division of Reactor Licensing d
Enclosure:
List of Attendees cc:
D. J. Skovholt T. J. Carter D. L. Ziemann R. W. Reid j
J. J. Shea R. M. Diggs i
t 4
4
~ _.
O..
s 1
+
4 LIST OF ATTENDEES 1
FDNTICELLO - NSP MEETING-j )
MARCH 21, 1972_
1 i
- Name, Affillation A. Ward NSP - Engineering I
NSP - Nuclear Support Services j
L. Mayer G. Neils NSP -' Power Production-M. Clarity NSP - Plant D. Fitzgerald NUS Corporation i,
J. Silberg Shaw Pittman 1
j K. Seyfrit Compliance - Region III a
l R. McDermott Compliance - Headquarters -
l.
J. Youngblood DREP J. Gallo OGC T. Ipollito DRS J. Shea DRL G. Owsley DRL i
D. Ziemann DRL R. Reid DRL 4
T. Carter DRL 4
D. Skovholt DRL-2' V.~Benaroya DRL-R. Campbell DRL-
,