ML20128C343

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Staff Requirements Memo Re Commission 850613 Affirmation/ Discussion & Vote in Washington,Dc Approving SECY-85-139B, SECY-85-173 & SECY-85-158.EDO & General Counsel Must Forward Fr Notice & Update NRC Manual
ML20128C343
Person / Time
Issue date: 06/21/1985
From: Chilk S
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
To: Dircks W, Plaine H
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO), NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC)
References
REF-10CFR9.7 M850613, NUDOCS 8507030555
Download: ML20128C343 (2)


Text

IN RESPONSE, PLEASE l

UNITED STATES j

["

'g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION gf g

E W ASHIN GTON, D.C. 20555

'+4 June 21, 1985 OFFICE OF THE SECR ETARY MEMORANDUM FOR:

Herzel H.E. Plaine, General Counsel William J. Dircks, Executive Director for Operations 3

FROM:

Samuel J. Chilk,Secrety

SUBJECT:

STAFF REQUIREMENTS - AF(IFgATION/ DISCUSSION AND VOTE, 10:00 A.M.,

TERSDAY, JUNE 13, 1985, COMMISSIONERS' CONFERENCE ROOM, D.C. OFFICE (OPEN TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE)

I.

SECY-85-139B - Revised Disposition of Hearing Requests Regarding Edlow International Nuclear Materials License The Commission,by a 5-0* vote, approved an order that dismisses the request for a hearing on Edlow International Company's renewal of a license to store uranium hexafluoride and uranium ore concentrate at its warehouse facility in East St. Louis, Illinois as moot since Edlow has now withdrawn its license renewal request.

(Subsequently, on June 14, 1985 the Secretary signed the Order.)

II.

SECY-85-173 - Delegation of FOIA Appeal Function to the Secretary of the Commission The Commission, by a 4-1** vote (Commissioner Asselstine disapproving), approved'a rule change to 10 CFR Part 9 to delegate authority to the Secretary of the Commission to deny Freedom of Information Act appeals.

The Secretary is to act only after receiving the concurrence of the Office of the General Counsel.

4

  • Section 201 of the Energy Reorganization Act. 42 USC 55841, provides that action of the Commission shall be determined by a

" majority vote of the members present."

Chairman Palladino was not present when this item was affirmed.

Accordingly, the formal vote of the Commission was 4-0 in favor of the decision.

Chairman Palladino, however, had previously indicated that he would approve this paper and had he been present he would have affirmed his prior vote.

8507030555 850621 PDR 10CFR PT9.7 PDR

V 4 The Commission also approved the proposed manual chapter changes.

You should forward the Federal Register Notice for publication and update the NRC manual with the proposed changes.

(OGC/ADM/SECY)

(SECY Suspense:

7/8/85)

III.

SECY-85-158 - Final Amendments to 10 CFR Part 0,

" Conduct of Employees" The Commission, by a vote of 5-0,*** approved changes to 10 CFR Part 0 to codify in NRC's regulation provisions of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (18 U.S.C.

207) relating to reporting of financial assets by senior NRC officials as well as several other amendments relating to employee conduct.

(Subsequently, on June 17, 1985 the Secretary signed the Federal Register Notice.)

cc:

Chairman Palladino Commissioner Roberts Commissioner Asselstine Commissioner Bernthal Commissioner Zech Commission Staff Offices PDR - Advance DCS - 016 Phillips

    • Section 201 of the Energy Reorganization Act, 42 USC S5841, provides that action of the Commission shall be determined by a

" majority vote of the members present."

Chairman Palladino was not present when this item was affirmed.

Accordingly, the formal vote of the Commission was 3-1 in favor of the decision.

Chairman Palladino, however, had previously indicated that he would approve this paper and had he been present he would have affirmed his prior vote.

      • Section 201 of the Energy Reorganization Act, 42 USC 55841, provides that action of the Commission shall be determined by a

" majority vote of the members present."

Chairman Palladino was not present when this item was affirmed.

Accordingly, the formal vote of the Commission was 4-0 in favor of the decision.

Chairman Palladino, however, had previously indicated that he would approve this paper and had he been present he would have affirmed his prior vote.