ML20128C079
| ML20128C079 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | West Valley Demonstration Project |
| Issue date: | 06/10/1985 |
| From: | WEST VALLEY NUCLEAR SERVICES CO., INC. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20128C048 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-PROJ-M-32 -COM005254:195H, -COM5254:195H, 25396, NUDOCS 8507030441 | |
| Download: ML20128C079 (605) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:. ju 37' "O -
; m f s i
(g RECEIVED
-\
- JUN2O 995 , --
,W U S NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMM;cgio;;
NMSs Q
% MailSectica 4 4 WEST VALLEY DEIMSTRATION PROJECT SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT i
VOLUBE I i PROJECT OVERVIEW AND GENERAL INFORMATION l l lO i l l 2 to 4 /O
/
P cotKETED 1 ust;ac [E m o es
- E8 tr/ 2' grcmo t
\ n[idcttRA
[ S S',t.Id' Controlled Copy No, 30 - i o
-COM005254:195H 0507030441 850610 ,_,,
j 32 PDR hD
,w-----.-,,.--,,-.-.--.,--.-.-gn,--,w~-wn,_ -
,--,a,uaw___, , , < - - - , , - +
9
)
t 1 1EST VALLEY DEPONSTRATION PROJECT SAFETY ANALYSIS REPWT PH0 JECT OVERVIEW AND GENERAL INFORMATION TABM OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE LIST OF TABLES xy1ii LIST OF FIWRES xxii A.1.1 I ntroduc t i on . .' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 A.1.2 Overview of the Existing Plant Operation and Pr esolidification Decontamination. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 A.1 3 Description of the Mandated WVDP Activities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 A.1.3 1 Overview of HLW Handling and Vitrification. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 A.1.3 2 Overview of Waste Managerrent, Storage , and Disposal . . . . . . 7 A.1 3 3 overview of Final Decontamination and Decommissioning.... 7 i /9
\d Identification of Agents and Contractors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 A.I.4 A.1.5 Structur e of This Saf ety Analysis Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 A.1.5.1 Functional Structure of the West Valley Demonstration Pr oj e ct Saf ety Analysi s Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 A.1.5.2 Outline of the West Valley Demonstration Project S af e ty Anal ys i s R e port . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1
- A.1.5.3 Safety Analysis Report Distribution, Review and A p p r o v al . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 A.2.0 SUl9tARY SAFETY ANALYSIS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 A.2.1 S i t e An al ys i s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 5 A.2.1.1 Nat ur al P henom en a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 A.2.1.2 Site Characteristics Affecting The Safety Analysis... . ..17 A.2.1.3 Effect of Nearby Industrial, Transportation, and M il i tar y Fac il i ti es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 A.2.2 Radiological Impact Of Normal Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 O A.2.3 Radiological Impact From Abnormal Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
, ()
-COM005254 :195H i
TABLE OF CONTElfrS (CONTINUED) SECTION PAGE A.2.4 Accidents From Ongoing Operations and Presolidification De contacination. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22: lll A.2.4.1 On go i n g O pe rat i o n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2 A.2.4.2 Pr esolidification De contamination. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3 A.2.5 C o ncl us i o ns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 5 A.3.0 SITE CHARACTERISTICS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 A.3 1 Geo gr aph y an d D emogr aphy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 A.3 1.1 S i t e Loc a tion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 A.3 1.2 S i t e D es cr i p t i on . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .28 A.3.1.2.1 S i t e B o un d ar y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 9 A.3.1.2.2 Boundaries for Establishing Effluent Release Limits.. . . . 30 A.3.1 3 Population Distribution and Trends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 A.3 1 3 1 C ur r en t P op ul at i on . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 0
%.3 1.3 2 Population Distribution and Proj ectio rm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 A.3 1.3.2.1 Population Within 16 km................................. 32 A.3 1.3 2.2 Population Between 16 km and 80 km. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 A.3.1.3 3 Transient Population.................................... 33 A.31 3 4 P o p ul a ti o n D e ns i t y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3 A.3 1.4 Uses of Near by Land and Wat er s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4 A.3.1.4.1 Sit e vicinity Land Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4 A . 3.1. 4. 2 Community Faciliti es and Ins ti tutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 A.3 1.4.3 Water Use............................................... 37 A.3 1.4.3 1 Lake Erie C ommer cial F ishery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 A.3 1.4.3 2 Lake Eri e S pro t F1 shi ng . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 0 A.3 1.4.3 3 Cataraugus Creek Sport F1shery.......................... 40 A.3 2 Nearby Industrial, Transportation , and M il i t ar y F acil i t i es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2 A.3 2.1 N ucle ar Fac ili ti es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2
-COM005254:195H 11 L
TA81JC OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) SECTIGI PA2 e m i
\/
A.3.2.2 I n d us t r i es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2 A.3 2 3 M il i t ar y I ns t all a t io ns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2 A.3 2.4 Trans portation Fad 111ti es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 , A.3 3 M e t eor olo gy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 9 A.3.3.1 Regi onal Cl imat ol ogy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 A.3.3 1.1 General D es cri p tio n of Climate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 A.3 3 2 Local M et eor ol ogy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 9 A.3 3 2.7 D a t a S o ur c es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 9 A.3 3 2.2 Norm al and Ex t r em e Va1 ues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 A.3 3 2.2.1 Wind Spee d an d Dire c tion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 A.3 3.2.2.2 T em pe r at ur e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2 A.3 3 2.2 3 H um i d i t y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3 A.3.3.2.2.4 Precipitation........................................... 53 A
'2 ~
A.3.3.2.2.5 O the r Clim atic Vari a bl es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 4
' A.3.3.3 on-S ite Met eorologi cal P rogram. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 6 A.3 3.3.1 D es cri p tio n of the Pro gr am . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 6
'A.3 3 3.2 Data from the O n-Site Monitoring Program. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 A.3.3 4 Short-Term ( Accident ) Dis persion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 A.3 3 5 Long-Term D is persion Es ti mat es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 9 A.3.4 S urf a c e H y dr ol ogy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 A.3 4.1 Hydr ologi c D es cr i p ti on. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 A.3.4.1.1 S i t e an d Fa c i11 ti es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2 A.3.4.1.2 H yd rps ph e r e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2
. A.3 4.2 F 1 o o ds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3 A.3 4.2.1 Flood History........................................... 63 A.3 4.2.2 Flood D esi gn Co nsider atio ns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4 (O
gj A.3.4.2 3 Ef fects of Local Intense Precipitation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
-COM005254 :195H 111
l TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) SECTION PACE A.3 4.3 Probabl e Maximum F1ood . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 A.3.4.4 Potential Dam Failures (Seismically Induced) . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 A.3.4.4.1 Reservoir , Pumphouse, and Pipeline Descriptions. . . . . . . . . 66 A.3 4.5 Probable Maximum Surge and Seiche Flooding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 A.3 4.6 Probable Maximum Tsunami F1 coding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 A.3.4.7 I c e F l oo di ng . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 9 A.3.4.8 Wat er C anals and R es ervoi rs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 A.3 4.8.1 C an al s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 9 A.3 4.8.2 R es e r vo i r s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 9 A.3.4.9 Channel Di vers io rm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 9 A.3.4.10 Flooding Protection Requirements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 A.3 4.11 Low Water Storage Analysis.............................. 70 A.3.4.12 Environmental Acceptance of Effluents................... 70 A. 3 4.13 Chemical and Biological Composition of Adjacent Wat e r c o ur s e s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 g A.3.5 Su bs urf a c e H ydr ology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3 A.3.5.1 Regional and Area Charact eristi cs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 A.3.5.1.1 We ather e d Be dr ock Zone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3 A.3.5.1.2 Lacustrine Layer........................................ 74 A.3 5.1.3 L a v e r y T 111. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 5 A.3.5.1.4 Alluvial Fan............................................ 77 A.3 5.1.5 Gro undwater Users s ur vey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 8 A.3.5.2 S i t e C har act er i s ti cs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 8 A.3.5.3 . Contaminant Transpor t Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 A.3.6 Geology and S ei smology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 A.3.6.1 Basic Geologic and Seismic Information. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 A.3.6.1.1 Summary or Regional and Site Geology.................... 85 A.3.6.1.1.1 P h y s i o gr a ph y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 5
-COM005254:195H iv
r TAB 12 0F CONTENTS (CONTINUED) SECTION PA2
,q (s- !
A. 3 6.1.1.2 Geologic History........................................ 85 A.3.6.1.1.7 S tr at i gr a ph y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 6 A.3.6.1.1.4 S t r u c t ur e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 6 A.3.6.1.1.5 Su bs ur f ace H ydr ol ogy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 6 A.3.6.1.1.6 Engineering Geology Co nsiderations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 A.3 6.2 Vibratory Ground Motion................................. 87 A.3.6.2.1 underlying Tectonic Structur es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 A.3.6.2.2 Behavior During Prior Earthquakes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8i7 A.3.6.2 3 Engineering Properties of Materials Underlying the Site. 88 A.3.6.2.4 Ear t hquake H i s tor y. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 8 A.3.6.2.5 correlation of Epicenter with Geologic Structures. . . . .. . 92 A.3.6.2.5.1 Tectonic Provinces of the Site Region. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
.g- g A.3.6.2.6 Identification of Active Fau1ts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
%.J A.3.6.2.7 Description of Capable Fau1ts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 A.3.6.2.7.1 current Interpretation of the Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 A 3.6.2.7.2 Relation to Regional Tectonics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 A.3.6.2.8 Ma xi m um Ear th qua ke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 8 A.3.6.2.8.1 clarendon-Linden Structure Maximum Earthquake. . . . . . . . . . . 98 A.3.6.2.8.2 Tectonic Province Maximum Earthquake. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 A.3.6.2.9 Saf e Shutdown Earthquake . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 A.3.6.2.9.1 R es po ns e S pe ctr a SS E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 A.3 6.2.10 Operati ng Bas i s E arthqua ke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 A . 3. 6. 2.10.1 R es po ns e S pe ct ra 0B E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 A.3.6.3 Sur f ace F aul t i ng . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 l A.3.6.3.1 Geologic conditions of the site........................ 102 A.3.6.3.2 Evidence of Faul t O f f set . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103 r r-I ( ,T'_ / Identifi cation of capable Faults . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103 j A.3.6.3 3 c
I -COM005254:195H v i l I t
-----.n, --n. ,,, _ _ - - .- . - . ,
r TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) SECTION PACE A.3.6.3.4 Earthquakes Associ ated with Capable Faults. . . . . . . . . . . . . 103 A.3.6.3.5 Correlation of Epicenters with Capable Faults. . . . . . . . . . 103 A.3.6.3.6 D es cription of Capable Faults . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103 A.3 6.3.7 Zones Requiring Detailed Faulting Investi gation. . . . . . . . 104 A.3.6.3.8 Res ults of Faulting Inves tigation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 A.3.6.4 Stability of Subsurf ace Materi a1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 A.3.6.4.1 Geolo gi c Fe at ur es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 5 A.3.6.4.2 Properties of Underlying Mat eri als. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 A.3.6.4.2.1 L a bor at or y T es ti ng . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 7 A.3.6.4.2.2 I nde x P r o pe r ti es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 8 A.3.6.4.3 P l o t P l an . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1 1 A.3 6.4.4 Soil and Rock Charact eristi cs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 A. 3. 6. 4. 4.1 Static S oil Char act eris tics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 A 3.6.4.4.2 Dyn amic Soil Char act eri sti cs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113 A.3.6.4.5 Excava tio ns and Ba c kf ill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 15 A.3 6.4.6 Groun dwat er C ondi tio ns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115 A. 3. 6. 4.7 Response of Soil and Rock to Dynamic Loading. . . . . . . . . . .116 A.3.6.4.8 Li quef act i on P otenti al . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 A.3.6.4.9 Earthquake D esi gn Basis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 17 A.3.6.4.10 S tat i c A nal ys es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 17 A.3.6.4.11 C r i t e ri a an d D es i gn M etho ds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 17 A.3.6.4.12 Techniques to Improve Subsurf ace Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 A.3.6.5 S l o p e S t a b il i t y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1 7 A.3 7 Ecological Characterization of Western New York Nucle ar S er vi ces Cent er . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128 A.3 7.1 T er r es t r i al E co l o g y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 3 0 S umm ar y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 3 0 A.3 7.1.1 0
-COM005254:195H vi
/ t g-9 V
,j TA812 0F CONTEXTS (CONTINWD)
*A SECTIGI PAS
(%)4 = . A.3 7.2 Aquat i c E co 1 cgy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132 A.3.7.2.1 S umm ar y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 3 2 A.4.0 PRINCIPAL DESIM CRITERIA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 3 A.4.1 Pur pos e of the Fa cility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 5 A.4.1.1 Plant Feed............................................. 135 A.4.1.2 Plant Products and By-Products......................... 135 A.4.1 3 Facil i t y F un ct i ons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135 Structural and Mechanical Safety Criteria. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 6
~
A.4.2 A.4.2.1 W i nd L oadi ngs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 6 E.4.2.2 T orna do Loa d i n gs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 3 6 A.4.2 3 - (s Fl ood D es i gn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 3 7
)'
A.4.2.4 Missile Protection. . . . .' %'................................137 4. s ') , S e i sm i c D es i gn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 3 8 s A.4.2.5 I A.4.2.6 S now Loa di ng . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 3 8 A.4.2.7 Process and Equipment Deri ved Loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139 A.4.2.8 C om bine d Loa d C rit eria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 9 A.4.2.9 Subsurf ace Hydros tatic Loadings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139 f . A.4 3 ,
+
S af ety P r ote ctio n Sys t ems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 0 e . A.4'.3.1 G en er al . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 4 0 s
, \ '
A.4;3.2 Protection By Multiple Confinement Barriors and Systems................................................ 140 t A.4.3 2.1 # Confinement Barriers and Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 0 6 f A.4 3 2.1.1 Protection form External Radiation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141 A.4.3.2.1.2 Protection from Inhalation of Radioactive Materials....143 , . A.4.3 2.1 3 Protection From Ingestion of Radioactive Materials.....144 A433 Protection By Equipment and Instrument Selection. . . . .. .145 G A.4 3.k Nuclear Cri ti cal ity Saf ety. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145 O A.4 3.5 Radiolog'ical Prote ction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 6
-COM005254 :195H vii t
9a - L - , - , , , - - ,,,. .. , - - - - - - -
TABLE OF (%)NTElrTS (CONTINUED) SECTION PAT A.4 3.6 Fire and Explosion Prote ction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146 l Bk A.4.3 7 Fuel and Radioactive Waste Handling and Storage. . . . . . . .147 A.4 3 8 Ind us t ri al and Chemical S af ety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 7 A.4.4 Classification of Structures, Canponents, and Systems..148 A.4.4.1 Ha zar d Cl as s ifi c a tio n Sys t em . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 8 A.4.4.2 Saf ety Clas si f ication Sys t em. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149 A.4.4 3 Relationship of Design' Standards To Safety Classes. . . . .151 A.4.4.4 Quality Level Classification. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154 A.4.4.5 Service C1'assification Syst em. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155 A.7.0 WASH CONFINE!Elff AND MANAEPElff. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158 A.7.1 W as t e M ana gemen t C rit e ri a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 9 A.7.2 R a di ol ogi cal W as t es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160 A.7 3 No nra di olo gi cal W as t es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 7 A.7.4 Off-Gas Treatment and Ventilation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168 llh A.7.5 Liquid Was te Treatment and R etention. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 9 A.7.6 Liquid W as te Solidi f icat ion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170 A.7.7 S ol i d W as t es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 71 A.8.0 RADI ATION P ROTE CTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172 A.8.1 Assuring That Occupational Radiation Exposures Are As Low As Reasonably Achievable ( ALARA) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173 A.8.1.1 Polic y Co nsi dera tio ns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173 A.8.1.2 Des i gn C ons i de r at i o ns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 3 A.8.1.2.1 General Design Considerations for Maintaining E x p o s ur es A LA R A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 4 A.8.1.2.2 Equipment Desi gn Considerations for ALARA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174 A.8.1.2.3 Facility Layout Design Considerations f or ALARA. . . . . . . . 175 A.8.1.3 O per ation al Consi der ations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 6 A.8.2 Radi at i on S our ces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178 gg
-COM005254 :195H viii
TABLE OF ColfTElfrS (CONTINRED) SECTI(N PAM A.8.3 Radi ation Protection D esi gn Fe at ur es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179 A.8.4 Occupational D ose Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 180 A.8.5 He alth Physi cs Pro gr am . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 181 A.8.5.1 O r ga n i zat i o n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 181 A.8.5.1.1 Radiological and Decommissioning O peratio ns . . . . . . . . . . . . 181 A.8.5.1.2 Fa cil i t y O pe r at i o ns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185 . A.8.5.1.3 S af et y C ommi t t e es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 5 A.8.5.2 Equi pment , Ins trumentation, and Facilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . 186 A.8.5 2.1 Radiation Counting Instruments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187 A.8.5.2.2 Por table Radiation Detection Ins truments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188 A.8.5.2.2.1 Al pha D ete c tion I nstruments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 9 A.8.5.2 3 Airborne Contamination Sampling and Monitoring E qui pm e n t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 91 (\ s_s/ A.8.5.2.4 Personnel Monitoring Instruments and Service. . . . . . . . . . . 192 A.8.5.2.5 Instrument Storage, Calibration, and Maintenance Facilities............................................. 194 A.8.5.2.6 Health Physics and Radioactive Analysis Facilities.....195 A.8.5 2.7 Radiological Control Equipment and Clothing and Ass oci at e d Fac ili ti es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 5 A.B.5.2.8 Respiratory Protection Equipment and Associated F a c i l i t i es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 9 7 A.8.5.2.9 Equipment and Personnel Decontamination Facilities.. . . .199 A.8.5.3 Radiologi cal Control Proced ur es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 A.8.5.3 1 Radiation and Cont amination Surveys. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 A.8.5.3 2 Procedures for Ensuring that Occupational Doses Are ALARA...............................,............... 203 A.8.5.3 3 A c c es s Co ntr ol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 0 4 A.8.5 3 4 Sealed Source and Radioisotope Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207 () A.8.5 3 5 Radiation Protection Training. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208
-COM005254 :195H ix ,
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) SECTION PAT Personnel Monitori ng Progr am. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212 A.8.5.3.6 Airborne Radioactivity Monitoring Progr am. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218 O A.8.5 3 7 A.8.5.3.8 Cri ti calit y Saf ety Progr am . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219 A.8.6 Of f-sit e Dose As s essment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 222 A.8.6.1 Environmental Monitoring Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 222 A.8.6.1.1 Radiologi cal Mo nitoring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 222 A.8.6.1.1.1 Radi oact i vi t y in A i r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2 3 A.8.6.1.1.2 Radioactivity in Surface Water and Sediment. . . . . . . . . . . . 22 4 A.8.6.1.1.3 Radioactivity in the Food Chain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 225 A 8.6.1.1.4 Dire ct Enviro nmental Radi ation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227 A.8.6.1.2 Nonradiologi cal Moni tori ng. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 228 A.8.6.2 Analysis of Multi ple Contribution. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229 A.8.6.3 Esti mat ed Ex pos ur es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 30 A.8.6.3.1 Sour c e Te rm Es tima tion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3 0 A.8.6.3 2 Envi ronm ental Pat hways . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 31 0 A.8.6.3 3 Ra diolo gi c al Par am et e rs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3 2 A.8.6.3.4 A nal y t i cal T ool s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3 3 A.8.6.3 4.1 A tmos pheri c D is persio n Cod es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 4 A.8.6.3.4.2 L i qu i d Pa t hw ay C o des . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3 6 A.8.6.3 4.3 Tr ans por ta tio n Im pa cts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3 9 A.8.6.4 . Li qu i d R el e as e s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .'. . . 2 39 A.10.0 00N DUCT OF OPERATIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 43 A.10.1 Or gani zati onal S truc t ur e . . . . . . . . . . .,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .~ 2 4 4 A.10.1.1 Cor por at e Or gani zation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 4 4 A.10.1.1.1 Proj e ct O rgani zati on. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 4 4 A .10.1.1. 2 WV NS I n-Ho us e Or gani za tion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 4 4 A.10.1.1 3 Interrelationships with Contractors and Suppliers. . . . . . 246 0
-COM005254 :195H x
TABER OF CONTENTS (CONTINtED) SECTION PAE
Operating Organi zation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 6 A.10.1.2 A .10.1. 2.1 WVNS Or ga ni za ti o n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 4 6 A.10.1. 2. 2 Personnel Functions, Responsibilities, and A ut ho r i ti es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 4 7 A.10.1.3 Personnel Qualification R equir ements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 249 A.10.1 3 1 Mi nimum Qualification Requir ements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 49 A.10.1.3 2 Qualification or Plant Personnel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 249 A .10.1. 4 Li ai son With Outside Or ganizatio ns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 250 A.10.2 P r eo per at i o nal T es ti ng . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 251 A .10. 2.1 Administrative Procedures for Conducting the T es t P r o gr am . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 251 A.10 3 Tr a i ni ng Pr o gr ams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 5 2 A.10 3 1 Personnel S tarring and Training. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 252 A.10. 3 1.1 Gen er al Tr ai ni ng . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 3 O
(/ Radiation Wor ker Training. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 254 A.10 3 1.2 A.10.3 1 3 Radiation and Nuclear Safety Personnel Training. . . . . . . . 255 A.10.3.1.4 Plant Operators Training. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 255 A .10. 3.1. 5 Maintenance cr af tsmen/c ustodial Personnel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 6 A.10.3.1.6 Fissile Mat eri al Handler Training. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 256 A .10. 3.1. 7 S a c e t y Tr ai ning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 6 A.10.3 2 R et r ai ni n g P r ogr am . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 57 A.10.3 3 A dmi ni s tr a tio n an d R e cor ds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 7 A.10.4 Norm al O pe r at i o ns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 8 A.10. 4.1 Facil i ty Pr oced ur e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 8 A.10.4.1.1 P r e parat i o n an d F orm at . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 5 8 A.
- 0. 4.1.2 .O per a t i ng P r o ced ur es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 5 8 A.10.4.1.3 s af e t y R e v i ew . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 5 8
() A .10. 4. 2 P l a n t R e cor ds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 5 9
-COM005254 :195H xi
TABIE OF CDNTENTS (CONTINUED) SECTION PAE A.10.5 Emer ge n c y P l anni ng . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 60 lll A.10. 5.1 B as i c P 1 an . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 6 0
~
A.10.5.1.1 P ur po s e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 6 0 A .10. 5.1.2 S co pe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 6 0 A.10.5.1.3 Emer gency R es po ns e Organizatio ns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 260 A .10. 5.1. 3.1 D e par tment o f En ergy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 60 A.10.5.1.3 2 WVDP Emergency Organi zation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 261 A.10. 5.1. 3 3 WVDP Emer gency R es po nse Groups . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 7 A.10.5.1 3.4 M edi cal F acil iti es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2T;2 ' A.10. 5.1.3.5 Of f-Site Co unt y an d S tat e A genci es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 272 A.10.5.1.4 Emergency Control Faciliti es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 272 A.10. 5.1. 4.1 WVDP A dmi nis tr ati ve C ompl ex . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 72 A.10.5.1.4.2 Environnental and Dosimetry Laboratories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 273 A.10. 5.1. 5 C omm uni c a tio ns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 4 ggg A.10.5.1.5.1 WV DP Comm uni cat i o ns Equi pmen t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 4 A .10. 5.1. 6 Dete c tion and War ning Sys t ems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275 A.10.5.1.6.1 Fire................................................... 275 A.10. 5.1. 6. 2 Ra di atio n/ Cont amina tion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275 A.10.5.1.6 3 Eva c uat i o n S i gn a1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 7 A .10. 5.1.7 Evacuatio n Rout es and Roadblocks . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 8 A.10.5.1.8 Trai ning , Tes ts , and Exerci ses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 8 A .10. 5.1. 8.1 P e r so nn el T r ai ni ng . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 8 A.10.5.1.8.2 Equ i pm ent T es ti ng . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 8 A .10. 5.1. 8. 3 E xer ci s es an d D rills . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 9 A.10.5.1.9 Emer ge ncy R es po ns e L eve l s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 280 A.10. 5.1. 9.1 U n us u a l E ve n t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 8 0 280 A.10.5.1.9.2 Alert..................................................
-COM005254 :195H xii
TABW OF (XMITENTS (CONTINUED) SECTION PA2
/ ,\ \"/
A.10.5.1.9 3 S i t e E mer ge n c y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 81 A.10. 5.1. 9. 4 Gen er al Emer genc y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 81 A.10.5.1.10 N o t i f i ca t i o ns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 82 A .10. 5.1.10.1 Wes t Valley D emons tr ation Pr oj ect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 82 A.10.5.1.10.2 Notification of Off-Site Agencies and Authorities.. . . . . 282 A.10.5.1.10 3 No tification of DOE . Headquarters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 282 A.10.5.1.10.4 Notif icati on of N ew Y or k State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 282 A .10. 5.1.10. 5 Spe ci al N o tifi ca tion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 83 A.10.5.1.11 Publ i c I nf orm at i on . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 283 A.10. 5.1.1 1.1 Policy................................................. 283 A.10.5.1.11.2 ;0rganization........................................... 284 A.10.5.1.11 3 Emergency operations and Response Concepts. . . . . . . . . . . . . 285 A.10.5.1.11.4 Preparation and Dissemination of News Statements and fd R el e as es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 8 5 A.10.5.1.11.5 F a c i l i t i es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 8 5 A.10. 5.1.1 1. 6 E x er c i s es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 8 5 A.10.5.1.12 Emer gen c y R es our ces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 6 A .10. 5.1.12.1 Emer gency Equi pment and Suppli es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 286 A.10.5.1.12.2 DO E-Wide R es our c es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 8 A.10. 5.1.13 Emer gen cy P l a n R e vi ew . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 9 A.10.6 . D e commi s s i o ni n g . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 0 A.10. 6. 3 A greements With Outside Organizatio ns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 290 A.10.6.4 Ar r an ge m en ts f or F un di n g . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 0 A.10 7 Sec urit y and Saf eguar ds Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 291 A.10.7.1 Site and Facility Description. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 291 A .10. 7.1.1 Gen er al La yo ut . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 91 p A.10.7.1.2 Prot ecti on o f Mat eri a1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 291 U Sec ur i t y Ar e as . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 9 3 A .10. 7. 2
-COM005254:195H xiii 4
4
_T_ABLE OF (DNTElfrS (CONTINUED) SECTION PACE A .10. 7. 2.1 Pr ot e ct e d Are a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 93 A.10.7.2.2 Other Specific Security Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 294 A .10. 7. 2. 3 Post and Patrols....................................... 294 A.10.7.2.4 Protected and Isolation Zone Monitoring. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 296 A .10. 7. 3 Ac c es s Co ntr ol s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 7 A.10.7.3.1 Ba d ge S y s t em . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 7 A.10.7. 3 2 P e rs o nn e l E s co r t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 9 9 A.10.7.3.3 Pe r s o nn el A cces s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 9 A.10. 7. 3. 3 1 P r o t e ct e d Ar e a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 9 A.10.7.3.3.2 Per s onnel S e ar ches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 0 0 A.10.7.3 3.3 Pa c ka g e Se ar c h es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 0 0 A.10.7.3.4 Vehi cl e A cces s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 0 0
~
A .10. 7. 4 Intr usion and Dete c tio n A1 arms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 0 A.10.7.4.1 Desi gn and Performance Charact eristi cs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 300 0 A .10. 7. 4.2 A n n un c i a t o r s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 01 A.10.7.4.3 Emer ge n c y P ow er . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 02 A .10. 7.5 3ecurity Organization and Responsi bili ties. . . . . . . . . . . . . 302 A.10.7.5.1 Man agement o rga ni zat i on. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 02 A .10. 7. 5. 2 Sec urity Or gani zation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 02 A.10.7.5.3 Se cur i t y Pers o nnel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 03 A.10.7.5 3 1 Minimum Employment Qualificatio ns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 303 A.10.7.5.3.2 Authori zation and Permits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 303 A .10. 7. 5. 3. 3 Tr a i ni ng . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 0 3 l A.10.7.5 3.4 Qualif icati on wi th S idearms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 304 A.10.7.5 3 5 U s e o f We a po ns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 0 4 A.10.7.5 3.6 A rm s an d A mm uni t i o n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 04 A .10. 7. 5. 4 Se c ur i t y Equi pm e n t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 0 5
-COM005254 :195H xi v
TABtJE OF CONTENTS (CONTINLED) SECTICEI PAM (~N ,
\_) A.10. 7. 6 Responses To Security Threats and Alarm Annunciators... 305 A.10.7.6.1 Suspected Instrusion into the Protected Area. . . . .. . .. . . 305 A.10. 7. 6. 2 Apparent Att empt to Smuggle Contraband . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 6 A.10.7.6.3 Bom b T hr e at . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 0 6 A.10. 7. 6. 4 C i v il D is t ur bance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 0 6 A.10.7.6.5 Site Evacuation............................../......... 306 A.10. 7. 6. 6 F ir e or Explos ion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 7
=
A.10.7.6.7 Outage of Plant Protection Equi pment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 307 A .10. 7. 6. 8 A c ti o n R es po ns e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 0 7
~'
A.10.7.7 Central Alarm ar.d Communications Systen. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 308 A .10. 7. 7.1 S t af f i ng . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 0 8 A.10.7.7.2 Local C omm un i cati ons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 08 _s A.10.7.7 3 Ra di o C omm uni ca ti o ns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 8
',) A.10.7.8 Local L aw Enf orcement Authori ti es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 308 A.10. 7. 8.1 S i z e o f F c r ee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 0 9 A.10.7.8.2 K i nd o f A s s i s tan ce . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 09 A.10. 7. 8. 3 A r r an g en e n t s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 0 9 A.10.7.9 T es t an d I ns pe ct i on . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 0 9 A .10. 7. 9.1 Ph ysi cal Dar ri ers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 9 A.10.7.9.2 Al arm s an d A nnun c1 at or s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 09 j A .10. 7. 9. 3 D et e c t o rs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 0 A.10.7.9.4 C omm un i ca t i o ns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 0 A.10. 7. 9. 5 Other Sec urit y R elate d Equi pment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 310 A.10.7.9.5.1 Ill um i n at i o n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 0 A .10. 7. 9. 5. 2 cl ose d C i rc ui t TV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 310 A.10.7.10 Repor ts t o t he US D0 E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 310 A .10. 7.10.1 I n c i d e n ts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 1 I
-COM005254 :195H xv
TABLE OF CONTErrS (CONTINUED) SECTION PAG A.10. 7.11 Co ntr ol R e cor ds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 1 llh A.10.7.11.1 Securi ty, Tours , Ins pections , and Tes ts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 311 A.12.0 QU ALIT Y ASS UR AN CE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 4 A.12.1 , Or ga ni za t i o n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 6 A.12.1.1 Str uct ur es and R es ponsibili ti es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 316 A.12.1.1.1 WVNS R es po ns i bi l it i es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 316 A .12.1.1. 2 WVNS Quality Assurance Department Responsibilities. . . .. 317 A.12.1.1.3 Ebas co R es po ns i biliti es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317 A .12.1.1. 4 D ames and Moor e R es ponsibili ti es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317 A.12.1.1.5 Battelle, Pacific Northwest Laboratories, R es po ns i b il i ti es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 318 A.12.1.1.6 US DOE R es po ns i bi11ti es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 318 A .12.1. 2 Quality Ass ur ance Manuals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 318 A.12.1.3 US DO E R ev i ew s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 318 A .12. 2 Quality Ass ur an ce Pr o gr am. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 319 (Il A.12.2.1 D es i gn C o nt r ol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2 0 A .12. 2. 2 Pr oc ur em ent D oc umen t Co ntr ol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 21 A.12.2.3 Ins tractions , Procedur es , and Drawi ngs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 322 A .1 2. 2. 4 D oc ume n t Co nt r ol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 3 A.12.2.5 Control cf Purchased I tems and Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 324 A .12. 2. 6 Identification and Control of It ems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 5 A.12.2.7 Control of Processes................................... 325 A.12.2.8 I ns pe c ti o n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2 6 A.12.2.9. T es t C o nt r o1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2 7 A .12. 2.10 Control of Measuring and Tes t Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 328 A.12.2.11 Handling , Storage , and Shipping. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 328 A .12. 2.12 Inspection, Test, an d O pe ra ting S t atus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 329 O
-COM005254 :195H xvi
TABM OF CONTElfrS (CONTINIED) SECTION PA2 V A.12.2.13 Control of Nonco nf orming I t ems. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 330 A.12. 2.14 C or r e c ti ve A c ti o n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 31 A.12.2.15 Quali ty Assurance R ecor ds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 32 A .12. 2.16 Audits.................................................333 A.12.3 - Quality Assurance Implementation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 335 A.12 3 1 Utilization of Quality Levels in Design. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 337 A.12.3.2 Utilization of Quality Levels in Procurement. . . . . . . . . . . 338 A.12.3.3 utilization of Quality Levels in Cons tructi on/F abri cati on . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4 0 A.12.3 4 Utilization of Quality Levels in operations. . . .. .. .. . .. 341 1 O
-COM005254 :195H xvii
/"~ .
SAR VG.tBE I LIST OF TABLES A.1 3-1 Curie Content of Tanks 8D-4 and 8D-2 9 A.1.5-1 Structure of the West Valley Demonstration Project Safety Analysis Report A.2.4-1 Estimated Dose to the Maximally Exposed Off-Site Individual from Accidents Associated With Ongoing Operations A.2.4-2 Estimated Dose to the Maximally Exposed Individual from Accidents Associated With Presolidification Decontamination A.3 1-1 Locations and Populations of Towns and Villages Partially or Totally Within 16 Kilometers (10 Miles) of Site A 3 1-2 Populations of Counties in the 80 km Site Region of New York and Pennsylvania (1970 and 1980) A 3 1-3 1980 Population Estimates by Sector Within 16 Kilometres (10 Miles) of Site Fertility Assumption 2.1 Children Per Woman Migration Assumptions: 1970-1975 Migration Trend (~)) A.3.1-4 1990 Population Projections oy Sector Within 16 Kilometers (10 miles) of Site Fertility Assumption 2.1 Children Per Woman 1970-1975 Migration Trend Migration Assumptions: A.3.1-5 2000 Popul.stion Projections by Sector Within 16 Kilometres (10 Miles) of Site Fertility Assumption 2.1 Children Per Woman Migration Assumptions: 1970-1975 Migration Trend A.3.1-6 1980 Population Estimates by Sector Within 16-80 Kilometres
- (10-50 Miles) of Site
' Fertility Assumption 2.1 Children Per Woman Migration Assumptions: 1970-1975 Migration Trend ! A.3.1-7 1990 Population Projections by Sector Within 16-80 Kilometres ! (10-50 Miles) of Site Fertility, Assumption 2.1 Children Per Woman Migration Assumptions: 1970-1975 Migration Trend l
-COM005220:161 H xviii
A.3 1-8 2000 Population Projections by
- ector Within 16-80 Kilometres &
W (10-50 Miles) of Site
~
Fertility Assumption 2.1 Children Per Woman Migration Assumptions: 1970-1975 Migration Trend A.3 1-9 1990 Population Projections by Sector Within 16 Kilometres (10 Miles) of Site Fertility Assumption 2.1 Children Per Woman Migration Assumptions: No Migration A 3.1-10 2000 Population Projections by Sectcr Within 16 Kilometres (10 Miles) of Site Fertility Assumption 2.1 Children Per Woman Migration Assumptions: No Migration A.3 1-11 1990 Population Projections by Sector Within 16 Kilometres (10 Miles) of Site A.3 1-12 2000 Population Projections by Sector Within 16-80 Kilometres (10-50 Miles) of Site Fertility Assumption 2.1 Children Per Woman Migration Assumptions: No Migration A.3 1-13 Estimated Production of Selected Agricultural Commodities in Cattaraugus County and Site Vicinity Towns - 1980 A.3 1-14 User Population of Schools and Hospitals in the Site Vicinity A.3.1-15 Commercial Fish Landings for New York Waters at Lake Erie, 1980-1983 A.3 3-1 Buffalo National Weather Service Station Wind Speeds and Directions A.3 3-2 hean and Extreme Temperatures A.3 3-3 Daily Maximum and Minimum Temperatures A.3.3-4 Monthly Mean Relative Humidity
'A.3 3-5 Monthly Mean Water Equivalent Precipitation Monthly Maximum and Minimum Values A.3.3-6 Monthly Maximum Water Equivalent Falls A.3 3-7 Maximum Monthly and Daily Snow Falls A.3 3-8 x/Q Values for Routine Ground Release A.3 3-9 x/Q Values for Routine Elevated Release A.3 4-1 Buttermilk and Cattaraugus Creek Flow Data xix -COM005220:161H 0
~
i I L l (~%
'Q.
A.3.4-2 Dam Physical Characteristics A.3 5-1 Water Quality Results - Weathered Bedrock Zone
, A.3.5-2 Local Water-Well Inventory A.3.5-3 Summary of Aquifer Characteristics for the Lavery Till A.3.6-1 Historical Seismicity Within 480 Kilometres of Site i
A.3.6-2 Summary of Index Property Tests A.3.6-3 Results of Direct Shear Tests A.3.6-4 Results of Unconfinea and Triaxial Compression Tests A.3.6-5 fummary of Hydraulic Conductivity Results A.4.4-1 WVDP Hazard Classification System A.4.4-2 Major Project Facilities and Activities Requiring Safety Analysis A.4.4-3 WVDP Safety Classification System
<~s A.4.4-4 Minimum Quality Levels, Codes, and Standards for Structures, Systems,
() . and Components A.4.4-5 WVDP Quality Levels A.4.4-6 WVDP Service Classification System . A.7.2-1 Radionuclide Content of Waste Packages Based on Detecting 1 Ci of Cs-137 A.7.2-2 Summary of Previously Buried Wastes A.7.2-3 Waste From Existing Systems Operations A.7.2-4 Secondary Waste Streams from the Radwaste Treatment System A.7.2-5 Presolidification Decontamination Wastes , A.7.2-6 Secondary Waste Streams From Vitrification A.7.2-7 Post Solidification D/D Wastes A.8.6-1 Effluent and On-Site Radiological Monitoring Program A.8.6-2 Off-Site Radiological Monitoring Program () -COM005220:161H xx L - -- - -. - - - - -
A.8.6-3 Measured Concentrations of Airborna Particulate Radioactivity Collected by Perimeter Air Samples A.8.6-4 Measured Concentrations of Particulate Radioactivity In Plant Ventilation Stack Effluent A.8.6-5 Measured Concentrations of Radioactivity in Surface Water and Sediment A.8.6-6 Radioactivity Discharged from the LLWT System Through Lagoon 3 in 1983 A.8.6-7 Measured Concentrations of Radioactivity in lilk, Deer, and Fish A.8.6-8 Direct Environmental Radiation Exposures A.8.6-9 Measured Concentrations at SPDES Discharge Points A .10. 4- 1 WVNS Policies and Procedures A.10.4-2 List of Prpject Standard Operating Procedures A .10. 5-1 Emergency Notification Order and Priorities A.10.7-1 Security Related Reports to DOE O -COM005220:161H xxi
- I LIST & FIG 9_ES A.1 3-1 KLW Processing Flow Sheet A.1.4-1 Proj ect Interf aces A.3 1-1 Site Location A.3.1-2 Site Vicinity Map-Northerb Portion A.3.1-3 Site Vicinity _ Map-Southern Portion A.3 1-4 Site Boundary and Exclusion Zone A.3 1-5 Topography and Detail of the Protected Area A.3.1-6 1980 Population Estimates by Sector Within 16 Kilometers (10 Miles) of Site A.3 1-7 1990 Population Projections by Sector Within 16 Kilometers (10 Miles) of Site A.3.1-8 2000 Population Projections by Sector Within 16 Kilometers (10 Miles) of Site l3
\s/ A.3.1-9 1980 Population Estimates by Sector Within 16-80 Kilcmeters (10-50 Miles) of Site A.3 1-10 1990 Population Estimates by Sector Within 16-80 Kilometers (10-50 Miles) of Site A.3 1-11 2000 Population Projections by Sector Within 16-80 Kilometers (10-50 Miles) of Site A.3 1-12 Population Density Within 48 Kilometers (30 Miles) of Site A.3 1-13 Site Vicinity Land Use-Northern Portion A.3 1-14 Site Vicinity Land Use-Southern Portion A.3 1-15 Numbers of Dairy Cows by Sector Within 16 Kilometers of Site A.3 1-16 Numbers of Dairy Cows by Sector Within 80 Kilometers of Site A.3.1-17 Number of Meat Producing Animals Within 16 Kilometers.of Site A.3.1-18 Number of Meat Producing Animals Within 80 Kilometers of Site
-COM005220:161 H xxii
A.3.1-19 Agricultural Produce Land Area (ha) by Sector Within 16 Kilometers of Site A.3.1-20 Agricultural Produce Land Area (ha) by Sector Within 80 Kilometers of Site A.3 1-21 Institutions in the Site Vicinity A.3 3-1 Burralo Surface Data 10 Meter Wind Frequency Distribution January 1, 1973-December 31, 1977 A.3.3-ta Winter D'ata (December-February) A.3.3-1b Spring Data (March-May) A.3 3-1c Summer Data (June-August) A.3 3-1d Fall Data (September-November) A.3.3-2 WVDP Meteorological Monitoring Network A.3.3-3 10-Meter Wind Frequency Distribution, Primary Site October 1,1983-September 30, 1984 A.3 3-4 60-Meter Wind Frequency Distribution, Primary Site Octobe r 1, 1983-Sept ember 30, 1984 A.3 3-5 10-Meter Wind Frequency Distribution, Regional Site, Octcler 1, 1983- !h September 30, 1984 A.3 3-6 10-Meter Wind Frequency Distribution, West Valley Site, October 1,1983-September 30, 1984 A.3 3-7 10-Meter Wind Frequency Distribution, Riceville Site, October 1, 1983-September 30, 1984 A.3 3-8 10-Meter Wind Frequency Distribution, Cattaraugus Site, October 1, 1983-Sept ember 30, 1984 A.3.3-9 10-Meter Wind Frequency Distribution, Connoisarauley Site, October 1, 1983-September 30, 1984 9 A.3 10-Meter Wind Frequency Distribution, Springville Site, October 1, 1983-September 30, 1984 A.3 4-1 Water Courses Western New York Nuclear Service Center A.3 4-2 Comparative Flows of Buttermilk and Cattaraugus Creeks
-COM005220:161H xxiii
9 P Streams and Ditches Draining the West Valley Demonstration Project
~ \' A.3.4-3 Facilities Area ,
A.3 4-4 Streams Draining the Western New York Nuclear Service Center Including the West Valley Demonstration Project A.3 4-5 Lake Water Supply System A.3.4-6 Storage Capacity VS Elevation Curve for Dam 1 Reservoir A.3.4-7 Storage Capacity VS Elevation Curve for Dam 2 Reservoir A.3.4-8 Storage Capacity VS Elevation Curve for Combined Dams 1 and 2 Reservoirs A.3 4-9 Lake Pump House A.3.5-1 Isopach Map of the Halocene Alluvial Fan Deposit on the North Plateau Showing Areal Extent and Thickness A.3 5-2 Groundwater Flow Directiors in the North Plateau Alluvial- Fan A.3 5-3 Location of Off-site Surveyed Wells A.3 5-4 Groundwater Recharge Areas g)-
'(_, A.3 5-5 Grcundwater Contour Map and Flow Directions for the Upper Portion of the Lavery Till A.3 5-6 Location of on-site Wells A.3.6-1 Seismicity in the West Valley Area A.3.6-2 Comparison of General Eastern United States Attenuation with Actual Experience in Site Region A.3.6-3 Isoseismal Map of the Cornwall-Massena Earthquake September 5, 1944 MMI VIII A.3.6-4 Isoseismal Map of the Attica Earthquake of August 12, 1929, MMI VII A.3.6-5 Regional Tectonic Map A.3.6-6 Subsurface Map Showing Structure Contours on the Medina Formation A.3.6-7 Clarendon-Lenden Fault and Associated darthquakes,1975 Interpretation A.3.6-8 Stress Provinces
() -COM005220:161 H xxiv
Focal Mechanism Solutions (Lower Hemispheres) Northeast US -
~
A.3.6-9 Southeast Canada , A.3.6-10 Interpretation of vertical Crustal velocity for Lake Ontario Region
~
Relative to Cape Vincent, NY A.3.6-11 Recommended Response Spectra - Safe Shutdown Earthquake A.3.6-12 Recommended Response Spectra - Operating Basis Earthquake A.3.6-13 ceneralized Seismo-Sectonic Map of New York Showing Historical Seismicity A.3.6-14 Plot Plan Showing Location of Drill Holes and Subsurf ace Sections (Reprocessing Plant Area) A.3.6-15 Plot Plan Showing Location of Drill Holes (Low-Level Waste Treatment Facility Area) A.3.6-16 Plot Plan Showing. Local of Drill Holes (Solid Waste Disposal Area) A.3.6-17 Method of Performing Direct Shear and Friction Tests A.3.6-18 Methods of Performing Compression and Triaxial Ccmpression Tests A.3.6-19 Method of Performing Consolidation Tests O A.3.6-20 Subsurface Secticn J-J' A.3.6-21 Subsurface Sectior. K-K' A.3.6-22 Subsurface Section L-L' A.3.6-23 Confining Stress versus Undrained Shear Strength A.3.6-24 Correlation Between Relative Density and Standard Penetration Resistance A . 3. 7-1 Western New York Nuclear Services Center - Site Location A.4.4-1 West Valley Demonstration Project Safety Program Logic A.4.4-2 Procedure for Determining the Safety Classification of WVDP Structures, Systems, or C:xnponents A.4.4-3 Matrix Showing Relationship of Safety Level, Quality Level and Service Class
-COM005220:161 H xxy O
T (~J
\- A.8.5-1 WVDP Radiological and Decommissioning Operations Organization as it Relates to Health Physics A.8.6-1 Locations of Environmental Monitoring Stations A.8.6-2 Location of Effluent Radiological Monitoring Points - On-site A.8.6-3 Location of SPDES Monitoring Points On-site A.S.6-4 Compartment Model of Pathways A.10.1-1 WVDP Organization A.10.1-2 West Valley Nuclear Services Company Organization Chart A.10. 5 West Valley Demonstration Project Emergency Organization A.10.5-2 Initial Emergency Organization A .10. 5-3 WVDP Emergency Response Teams A.10.7-1 West Valley Demonstration Project Protected Area A.10.7-2 High Security Areas 'Ch A.10.7-3 Security Management Structure - (m,/
A .10. 7-4 Security Organization
'A.10.7-5 Ouard' Supervisor Checklist Report A.12.2-1 Basic Requirements of NQA-1 Applicable to WVDP Work Scope A.12.2-2 Basic Requirements of NCA-1 Applicable to Project Participants' Quality Assurance Program for the West Valley Demonstration Project
-COM005220:161H xxvi
/%
bl LIST OF SUPPLEENTS SUPPLEMENT A.3 1-A POPULATION PREDICTIONS USING DEM002. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-1 SUPPLEMENT A.3.1-B TRANSIENT POPULATION...................................A-8 SUPPLENENT A.3.1-C US ES OF NEARB Y LAND AND WATERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-17 SUPPLEMENT A.3 3-A JOINT WIND SPEED - WIND DIRECTION FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION PERSISTENCE. . . . . . . . . . . . A-30 SUPPLEMENT A.3 3-B SITE SPECIFIC METEOROLOGY DATA........................A-31 SUPPLEMENT A.3.3-C ATMOSPHERIC DISPERSION M0DE LS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-3 5 SUPPLEMENT A.3 4-A PROB ABLE MAXIMUM FLOOD INFORMATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-49 SUPPLEMENT A.3.6-A RE GIONA L AN D S ITE GE0 LO GY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A -5 8 SUPPLEMENT A.3.6-B LO GS OF B 0R IN GS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-8 9 SUPPLEMENT A.3.6-C TECTONIC PROVINCES OF THE SITE REGION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-91 SUPPLEMENT A.3.6-D TECTONIC PROVINCE MAXIMUM EARTHQUAKE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-117
) SUPPLEMENT A.3.6-E ESTIMATE OF GROUND M0 TION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-127 SUPPLEMENT A.3.6-F P ARTICLE SIZE ANALYSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-13 5 SUPPLEMENT A.3.6-G CONSOLID ATION TEST DATA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-13 6 SUPPLEMENT A.3.7-A TERRESTRI AL ECOLO GY OF THE SITE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-137 SUPPLEMENT A.3.7-B A QU ATI C E C0LO GY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A- 15 6 SUPPLEMENT A.3 7-C PUBLICATIONS REVIEWED AND AUTHORITIES
! CONTACTED FOR PREPARATION OF SECTION A.3 7 l AND SUPPLEMENT A.3.7-A AND A.3 7-B...................A-171 SUPPLEMENT A.3.7-D S P E C I ES L IS TS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A- 1 8 0 l l 1
-COM005220:161H xxvii
O INTRODUCTIOK AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE WEST VEgy DDONSTRATION PROJECT O I 9 I O
-COM005222s1Sny 1
h V A.
1.1 INTRODUCTION
This Safety Analysis Report (SAR) was prepared to meet the requirements of the U. S. Department of Energy Order DOE-5481.1 A (US DOE,1981), Idaho Operations Office Order ID-5481.1 (US DOE-ID,1981), an'd West Valley Nuclear Services Company, Inc. (WVNS) Policy and Procedure WV-906 (WVNS,1984). The purpose of this analysis is to support the Department's decisions with respect to the specific means of accomplishing the various aspects of the West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP). The WVDP is being undertaken by the Department pursuant the West Valley Demonstration Project Act (P.L. 96-368; the "Act"). The Act directs the Secretary of Energy to undertake five major activities as follows: [:] Solidify the liquid High-Level Waste (HLW) stored at the Western New York Nuclear Service Center (WNYNSC) into a form suitable for transportation and disposal; (3 V [2] Develop containers for the solidified HLW which ere suitable for pennanent disposal of the HLW; l [3] Transport the waste to a federal repository for disposal; [4] Dispose of Low-Level Waste (LLW) and Transuranic (TRU) waste produced by the Project; and l ( [5] Decontaminate and decommission: i l a. the HLW storage tanks i
- b. the HLW solidification facilities, and
- c. any material and hardware used in connection with the Project.
I t
. -COM005222:154H 2 l
1.
l The site of the WVDP (the " Project Premises") is situated within the boundaries of the WNYNSC or the " Center" and is the location of the former Nuclear Fuel Services (NFS) spent nuclear fuel reprocessing f acility. The WNYNSC is located about 55 km south of Buffalo in the Town of Ashford, I l Cattaraugus County. (See Figure A.3.1-1 for a map showing the site location.) Beyond the activities mandated by the Act, several ancillary tasks and supporting activities must be accomplished in conjunction with the WVDP. The main task and ancillary activities are as follows: o Existing Plant and Operations, o Component Test Stand Vitrification Facility, o Supernatant Treatment System, o Sludge Mobilization System, o Vitrified High-Level Waste Storage, o Cement Solidification Systen, o Liquid Waste Treatment System Upgrades, o Size Reduction System, o Lag Storage Facility, o Disposal Area Operations, and o Final Decontamination, Decommissioning an1 Waste Shipment. These activities are the subject of this SAR. O
-COM005222:154H 3
V A.1.2 OVERVIEW OF THE EXISTING PLANT OPERATION AND PRESOLIDIFICATION DECONTAMINATION The Department of Energy's takeover of the Project site on February 25, 1982 brought with it the responsibility of operating the existing facilities in their shutdown status. As part of the pretakeover activities, US DOE and WVNS reviewed the SAR prepared by NFS in conjunction with their U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (US NRC) licensing efforts. After this review, the Technical Specifications which were a part of the NFS license (the NFS license has been suspended by US NRC) were adopted by the Project for interim operation. One of the purposes of this SAR is to provide the basis for modifying and/or eliminating the existing Technical Specifications (called Operational Safety Requirements, or OSRs by US DOE) to bring them into line with the ongoing operations of the existing plant (See Volume VI). One aspect of the existing operations which has already been subjected to safety reanalysis and re-review is fuel handling and shipment. p Soveral portions of the existing plant will be modified for use in conjunction with the WVDP. In order to permit these various cells to be put to new uses, they must be decontaminated and in most cases stripped of the equipment they contain. Initially, these presolidification decontamination activities have been analyzed and reviewed on a case-by-case basis. However, most of the safety questions which arise in conjunction with these analyses are common from cell to cell. Such issues as control of airborne contamination, worker exposure, waste handling and packaging, criticality control, and so forth are under consideration in virtually all the decontamination efforts. In order to streamline the review and orderly progress of the presolidification decontamination activities, an analysis of these common safety questions is presented in Volume II.
-COM005222:154H 4
i )
'~' A.I.3 DESCRIPTIOff 0F THE MANDATED WVDP ACTIVITIES A.I.3.1 OVERVIEW OF HLW HANDLING AND VITRIFICATION The HLW to be vitrified is stored in two tanks containing two different waste forms. Alkaline PUREX wastes are stored in Tank 8D-2, and acidic THOREX wastes are stored in Tank 8D-4 Tank 8D-2 has a total capacity of 2.8 million litres and contains approximately 2.1 million litres of the PUREX waste. Tank 8D-4 has a capacity of 57,000 litree and contains approximately 31,000 litres of the THOREX waste. Both tanks are backed up with respectively identical tanks (8D-1 for 8D-2 and 8D-3 for 8D-4) for emergency transfer and condensate collection.
The acidic THOREX wastes exist in essentially a single, liquid phase (although there is some indirect evidence of evaporite " caking" on the tank walls). However, the PUREX wastes exist in two distinct phases referred to as the supernatant and solids (or sludge) phases. Table A.1 3-1 provides an isotopic (%,) . distribution of the major radioactive constituents of the West Valley HLW. Figure A.1 3-1 is a simplified schematic of the HLW transfer and vitrificatibn process to be employed at West Valley. In an early and separate campaign, the
,supernatant phase of the PUREX HLW will be decanted from Tank SD-2 and into the Supernatant Treatment System (STS). The STS consists of a cooler, a feed tank, three zeolite ion exchange columns connected in series, a filter, and a bounce tank. The ion exchange columns will be installed inside Tank 8D-1. As the columns become loaded, the :eolite will be sluiced into the modified Tank 8D-1 that surrounds the ion exchange columns. The decontaminated supernatant will be pumped to the Radwaste Treatment System (RTS) where it will be filtered, concentrated, and mixed with cement in the Cement Solidification System (CSS).
t O V
-COM005222:154H 5
-The sludge fraction of the HLW in Tank 8D-2 will be mobilized by a series of low pressure recirculating sluicers. When the vitrification process is ready
~
to receive HLW, the mobilized sludge, loaded zeolite resin, and THOREX waste will be transferred to the Feed Concentrator Make-up Tank in the Vitrification Cell where the glass formers will be blended together with these wastes and transferred to the Melter Feed Tank. From this tank the feed will be delivered to the Slurry-Fed Ceramic Melter (SFCM) where it is joule heated to form the molten, waste-loaded, borosilicate glass. The molten glass is then airlif ted from the Melter into stainless steel canisters which are positioned by a carousel which rotates the canister to be filled under the SFCM. Once a canister is filled, it remains in the carousel until it is indexed to a position out from under the Melter where it can be removed for further cooling and canister lid welding. Once the canister lids are welded, the canisters are loaded on a transfer cart which will then move on rails into the Equipment Decon Room (EDR) of the existing plant. Ir. the EDR surf ace contamination will be reduced to acceptable levels. After decontamination, the canisters are transferred to the Chemical Process Cell (CPC) in the existing plant for storage in racks until such time as they can be shipped to the federal repository. Off gas from the SFCM will be routed through a Submerged Bed Scrubber (SBS) and a High Efficiency Mist Eliminator (HEME). It then exits the Vitrification Cell via a pipeline to the 01-14 Building where it is processed further through a primary and a secondary NO x scrubber, entrainment separator, roughing and iodine filters, and finally a HEP A filter before being released to the plant stack. O
-COM005222:154H 6
/
C\ () A.1 3.2 OVERVIEW OF WASTE MANA2fElff, STORAGE, AND DISPOSAL The various operations at the WVDP will produce considerable amounts of low-level wastes. Plant operations, decontamination, vitrification, supernatant treatment, etc. will all have low-level waste streams to be treated and prepared for disposal or shipment. Liquid wastes will be filtered, in some cases subjected to ion exchange, and concentrated by eva poration. Filter backwashes, loaded ion exchange resins, and concentrates will then be batched to the Cement Solidification System to be blended with cement and any necessary additives in twin high-shear mixers. Once blended, the waste-loaded cement is discharged from the mixer to 208-litre drums which are capped, smeared, allowed to set-up, and then are outloaded for transfer to Lag Storage or Waste Disposal. A 780 m2 Lag Storage Building has been constructed to store LLW awaiting a disposal campaign and TRU waste awaiting shipnent. This facility has already been subjected to safety analysis and review, but the description and analysis is included in Volume IV for completeness. {) LLW disposal operations are being ' subjected to extensive environmental evaluation. When a disposal method is selected, a safety analysis will be performed for LLW handling and disposal operations and will be included as part of Volume IV. A.1.3.3 OVERVIEW OF FINAL DECONTAMINATION AND DEC0tMISSIONING Section Reserved
-COM005222:154H 7
s
, j
~~$ l e
TABIE A.1 3-1'
/ .
[ CURIE OMfTElff 0F TANKS 8D-4 AND 8D-2 Total Curies t ] Principal Decay Isotope Mode 8D-4 Tanke 8D-2 Supernatant' 8D-2 Solidse Cs-137 8 5.63 x 105 8.08 x 106 _o 6
, Ba-137m Y 5.29 x 105 7.60 x 10 ,o b" Sr-90 8 5.52 x 10 5 3.22 x 103 7,74 x jo 6 Y-90 'S 5.52 x 10 5 y.22 x 103 7,74 x jo 6 Cs-134 8 1.27 x 103 6.67 x 103 _o t H-3 S <10 , 1.23 x 10 2 ,o h I-129 . 8 <2 x 10 -1 / 2 x 10 -2 5.98 x 10 2 0
Rare' Earths 8 1.90 x 10" , 1.55 x 10 6 Misc. 8 (incl . Pu-241 ) S 2.92 x 103 4.76 x 103 1 32 x 10 5 Misc. Y Y -0 -0 2.3 x 10 2 2 Pu a 5.79 x 10 1.78 x 10 2 3,39 x jo 4 U a 2.7 8.6 x 10 -1 12.9 Other,TRU a 2.97 x 10 2 0 2.29 x 10"
,,,- 4 g TotaIY , 5.29x10[ -
5 7.60 x 10 6 2.3 x 10 2 f Tot $18 1.69 x 10 6 8.10 x 10 6 1.72 x 10 7
'j$tala 8.79 x 10 2 j,79 x jo2 3.48 x 10"
- Note: Samples were taken about 9 months apart i
V- -CCM005200:158H 9 9
1 3 O I. A e g E n R r sm c a U de a e r . io gro t eet nt G nGt iaf y s E M t su r ci ed S l I F n ispnd C o san f d mO e S e g r e F al Ro f rd b S CCInHa e eb b mBru c s u S r S 3 " e m r o (A " n " F .
- 7 -
s , s la G ,m
,l e 3 - ."
oey r
,S t
t re ["* , ef M", T r o E '
)o.t a t
p r u km a , a E 1
.neneka9 1 H : ?
[pcaT nM o ' C O S W r e O g nr L 3 aS h . cs F H E xC e cv G i no am N I g r r o v aa e m o 1 e int S t t r o t o s vS jB a t t n S e d t a e a g W X E S it lo ie f id n e lu r d 2 E R C e o p S DU S C .V Z s M S u 8P O R e m X P m m m m a E a i m 4. R tOs an DHa W L 8TWoeo a o w n O H a a r e
; l ,:l'
( A.1.4 IDENTIFICATION OF A33rrS AND CONTRACTORS The US DOE-ID has been assigned the responsibility for implementing the WVDP. US DOE-ID has established a project office (WVPO) for the on-site administration of the Project. Since the State of New York is the owner of the site and is required by the Act to participate in the f unding of the Project, a Cooperative Agreement between the Department and the State has been established (US DOE /NYSERDA, 1981). The State is represented by the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) in this relationship and is represented o n-site . The Act also requires the US DOE to consult with the US NRC concerning the substantive aspects of the Project, and US NRC approval of the Final Decontamination and Decommissioning Plan to be implemented upon completion of the Project. The relationship between the US DOE and US NRC in this regard O ( ,) has been outlined in a memorandum of understanding (MOU;46 FR 56960) between the two agencies. The Act also requires the Department to consult with the U.S. Department of Transportation (US DOT), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), and the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) in matters relating to their respective areas of expertise and concern. These relationships have been established, though somewhat less formally than those with the State and the US NRC. The Department has retained the West Valley Nuclear Services Company, Inc. (WVNS, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Westinghouse Electric Corporation) as the prime contractor for operation of the site facilities, and design and implementation of the WVDP. Dames and Moore (D and M) joined with WVNS in the original procurement to provide geotechnical, environmental, and safety assessment services for the Project. O
-COM005222:154H 8 m
Ebasco Services, Inc., Pacific Northwest Laboratories (PNL) and Societe Generale pour les Techniques Nouvelles (SGN) have been retained for design services. The Project also consults with and is engaged in technology transf er on a national level with the Commercial Waste Treatment Program and Defense Waste Processing Facility, and on an international level with German, French, and Japanese nuclear program organizations. These relationships are illustrated in Figure A.1.4-1 e i l l l l 1 9 j -COM005222 :154H 9 l
l O O O PROJECT INTERFACES O mQ [ con n consunation Direction [ Direction Consultation i i W Information and \v P I roject Participant NYS Coordination D \N S : RD Technology Exchange Permitting NE CWTP DWPF i 4son I EBASCO waste i oau V
)
V Chem 670 T843 Ot9 FIGURE A.I.4-1
-s V A.1.5 STRUCTIEE OF THIS SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT A.I.5.1 FINCTIONAL STRUCTURE OF THE WEST VALLEY DEIONSTRATION PROJECT SAFETY ANALYSIS REPGtT Most of the major components of the WVDP are functionally interrelated; however, many of these components can and will f unction independently as well. For example, the Supernatant Treatment System f unctions to strip the cesium and strontium from the liquid phase of the PUREX HLW. These materials are then to be blended with the THOREX waste and the sludge phase of the PUREX waste and, together with the glass formers, are to be fed to the melter.
Thus, the Supernatant Treatment System has a clear interrelationship with both the Sludge Mobilization System and the vitrification process (as well as with others). Notwithstanding these interrelationships, the Supernatant Treatment System will be operated independently (in time) of the Sludge Mobilization System and the vitrification process. () The concept of bringing systems on line independently is due in part to the complex nature of the WVDP, the fact that several major components require significant 'predesign developmental' work, and the realities of f unding constraints. In order to avoid a situation where the safety analysis preparation and review cycle becomes an impediment to the advancement of the Project as a whole, the concept of a modular safety analysis was developed. This scheme permits the individual major Project components to be conceptualized, designed, analyzed, reviewed, constructed, and operated on more or less independent schedules while an integrated safety analysis covering the entire Project is evolving over time. Table A.I.5-1 lists the parts of this modular document. U
-COM005222:154H 10
Volume I provides an overview of the scope and purpose of the WVDP. It is the volume in which the summary saf ety analyses for all the Project components are h compiled as they are developed. Volume I also includes the site characterization and generic discussions of the safety classification system and design standards, the radiation protection program, the organizational structure of the WVDP, and the quality assurance program. Volume II provides the detailed safety analysis of the existing plant as it is being operated in its shutdown status, decontaminated and decommissioned. Volumes III, IV, and V will present the detailed f acility- or activity-specific safety analyses as shown in Table A.1.5-1. As they are developed, the OSRs (Tech. Specs.) for the entire Project will be compiled in Volume VI for easy reference. Pursuant to the requirements of the US DOE-ID Order ID-5481.1 and the WVNS Policy and Procedure WV-906 implementing this order, there will never be an activity or system under operation with an unreviewed safety question. Over the life of the WVDP, however, the safety analysis will be revised frequently as new parts are added and as preliminary analyses are replaced with final analyses. At some point af ter the HLW has been vitrified and just prior to the initiation of the final decontamination and decommissioning of the Project f acilities, the Project safety analysis will be complete. A.1.5.2 OtTTLINE OF THE WEST VALLEY DEMNSTRATION PROJECT SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Chapter I of US DOE-ID Operations Office Order ID-5481.1 provides direction with respect to the content of a safety analysis. An outline for the WVDP SAR has been developed to be consistent with this direction. This outline is based upon the " Standard Format and Content of Safety Analysis Reports for Fuel Reprocessing Plants - US NRC Reg. Guide 3.26" with slight modification and is described fully in " Technical and Administrative Approach for the WVDP Safety Program" (WVNS - 1984). 9
-COM005222:154H 11
O A.1.5.3 SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT DISTRIBUTION, REVIEW, AND APPROVAL WVNS Policy and Procedtre, WV-906, establishes the administrative steps for the initiation, preparation, and in-house and independent review of safety analys es. Once a given safety analysis has been approved by the WVNS Radiation and Safety Committee and a determination has been made that the activity under review constitutes either (1) a moderate or high hazard, or (2) is subject to review pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding between the US DOE and the US NRC (46 FR 56960),'regardless of the hazard classification,18 controlled copies will be forwarded to the Department's West Valley Project Office (WVPO). The WVPO will coordinate the review of the safety analysis beyond its interface with WVNS pursuant to US DOE-ID Operations Office Order ID-5481.1, the Memorandum of Understanding, and such other arrangements it may have with other parties. WVPO representatives have indicated that comments on a given safety analysis would be collected, screened, and forwarded to WVNS within 90 days e.' WVNS's () delivery of such an analysis to the WVPO.. The time required for WVNS to respond to comments will be a function of the nature of those comments but it is estimated to be a maximum of 60 days. For planning purposes, it is anticipated that the approval of a particular safety analysis would be forthcoming within 30 days af ter responses to comments have been forwarded to the WVPO by WsNS. r 1 i . j
-COM005222 :154H 12 t
REFERENCES FOR SECTION A.1 Memorandum of Understanding Between the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Department of Energy, Implementation of the West Valley Demonstration Project Act of 1980. FR Doc. 81-33439, Filed 11/18/81. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,1975. Regulatory Guide 3 26: Standard Format and Content of Safety Analysis Reports for Fuel Reprocessing Plants. West Valley Demonstration Project Act, October 1,1980. Public Law 96-368. U.S. Department of Energy Order DOE-1D 5481.1, Safety Analysis and Review System for DOE-ID Managed Activities. U.S. Department of Energy Order DOE-5481.1 A, Safety Analysis Review System. West Valley Nuclear Fuel Services, Inc.,1984 Technical and Administrative Approach for the West Valley Demonstration Project Safety Program. West Valley Ndelear Services, Inc., 1984. Policy and Procedure WV-906, Safety Review Program. O
-COM005222:154H 13
( TABIZ A.I.5-1 , STRUCTIEtE OF TIE IdEST VAL 12Y DEMMSTRATION PR(MECT SAFETY ANALYSIS REPGtT Volusse Title Part I Project Overview and General Information A II Existing Plant and Operations B III High-Level Waste Vitrification o CTS / Vitrification Facility C o Supernatant Treatment System D o Sludge Mobilization System E IV Waste Management, Storage and Disposal o . Vitrified High-Level Waste Storage F o Cement Solidification System G o Liquid Waste Treatment System Upgrades H o Size Reduction Facility I o Lag Storage Facility J c Disposal Area Operatir ns K V Final Decontamination, Decommissioning L and Waste Shipment VI Operational Safety Requirements M (Technical Specifications) O -COM005200:158H
= . _ , - - - _ _ , . . , , .- - - - . - -
(> A A.2.0 SINEARY SAFETY ANALYSIS
' A summary of the various safety analyses performed for facilities at the WVDP is presented in this chapter. Additional details on these analyses can be found in appropriate sections of this and other volumes. Section A.2.1 presents a discussion of the site-specific features of the Center in relationship to their influence on safety. Section A.2.2 summarizes the radiological impact of normal operations. Section A.2.3 summarizes the radiological impact of abnormal operations. A summary of the accidents analyzed and their radiological impact is given in Section A.2.4 Finally, conclusions related to safety are given in Section A.2.5.
O 9
-COM005222:154H 14 e
e
A V ' A.2.1 SITE ANALYSIS An analysis of the site-specific characteristics of the West Valley area has shown that the site is compatible with safe conduct of the Project. Site characteristics enter into the analysis in two ways: [1] As potential causes of accidents (e.g., natural phenomena); and [2] As mechanisms which can alleviate the impacts of accidents r (e.g., meteorology, population distribution). Mechanisms which can cause accidents are analyzed explicitly. Dispersive mechanisms in the environment are analyzed for all accidents with the potential for releasing radioactivity off-site. A.2.1.1 EATURAL PHEN 00ENA t'") Natural phenomena which can affect the safety of operations at the center
include earthquakes, tornadoes, and floods. The site is situated in a region that has experienced a moderate amount of relatively minor seismic activity.
The record of earthquake activity in Western New York and the surrounding area dates back over 100 years. The only significant (Modified Mercalli: Intensity 2 VII) earthquake activity in Western New York has occurred in the vicinity of the Clarendon-Linden Fault. Several small shocks in the Buffalo-Hamilton area were probably due to glacial rebound effects, i.e., local stress concentration as a triggering mechanism for earthquakes by causing minor crustal readjustments. O V
-COM005222:154H 15
Outside of the immediate West Valley area, there is a zone of major seismic activity near LaMalbaie, Quebec, in the lower St. Lawrence River Valley. Major earthquakes (MMI IX or X) have occurred in this area several times and most recently in 1925. The earthquakes were felt over the entire Eastern section of Canada and the Northeastern United States. The West Valley area probably experienced no more than MMI IV from any of these events; this would be the greatest level of ground motion experienced at the site in historical time. The design basis earthquake for the Project has been established as having a recurrence time of 1,000 to 5,000 years, with a peak acceleration of 0.1 g. This recurrence interval is considered conservative given the relatively short life time of the Project (1.5 years for HLW vitrification) compared to nominal life times of 30 to 40 years for nuclear facilities for which a recurrence time of 1,000 to 10,000 years is typical. The frequency and intensity of tornadoes in Western New York is low in comparison to other parts of the United States. An average of about two tornadoes of short and narrow path length strike localized areas of New York g State each year. For the period of 1950 through 1970, 16 tornadoes were reported within 80 km of the center. The design basic tornado for the Project was developed based upon detailed analyses of all tornado occurrences in Western New York State. The characteristics of the design basis tornado are: Recurrence time: 106 years Maximum wind speed: 260 Kph Potential speed: 180 Kph Translational speed: 80 Kph Radius of maximum rotational wind: 46 m . Total atmospheric pressure change: 2.4 kPa Rate of pressure drop: 1.0 KPa/sec. S
-COM005222:154H 16
10 (-) Even though the amount.of precipitation in West Valley is relatively high (averaging about 104 cm per year), flooding is not expected to be a major hazard due to the local topography and the relatively even distribution of precipitation throughout the year. Thunderstorms are infrequent because of the stabilizing influence of Lake Erie. For these reasons, flooding is not a hazard addressed in this safety analysis. A.2.1.2 SITE CHARAC1 ERISTICS AFFECTING THE SAFETY ANALYSIS The pathways by which radioactive effluents may be dispersed into the off-site environment may be broadly categorized as airborne or liquid. For airborne releases, the capacity of the atmosphere to dilute and disperse radioactiv,e effluents is of prime importance in evaluating the enviconcental effects of site operations under both normal and abnormal conditions. The dispersive capability of the atmosphere is a function of wind speed and direction and atmospheric stability. Local climatological data were obtained from an on-site meteorological tower where wind speed and direction are measured at 10 () and.60 metres from the base. Atmospheric stability classes are determined from the temperature difference between 10 and 60 metre elevations. Because the ridge and hills in the vicinity of the site frequently channel the winds, strong systematic deviations from straight line airflow are to be expected. To realistically account for the terrain effects on airflow, a fine grid, two dimensional wind field model was developed from additional wind monitoring stations in the site vicinity. Such a model can account for the effects of local terrain on atmospheric dispersion of airborne effluents. Major surface-water drainage features of the site area are Cattaraugus Creek and Buttermilk Creek (principally the latter). Buttermilk Creek originates south of the site, but its lower portions, including its confluence with Cattaraugus Creek, are wholly within the boundaries of the site. Buttermilk 2 2 Creek drains approximately 76 km , about 14 km of which are within the site boundaries. The average flow rate of the creek is 1.8 m3/3, O
\_)
-COM005222:154H 17
f 2 The total drainage area of Cattaraugus Creek is about 1400 km , including 2 above its confluence with Buttermilk Creek to the north of the site. 560 km Peak flow rates in Cattaraugus Creek occur in November-December and in March. In the vicinity of the site, the typical maximum flowrate is 20 m3 /s. Cattaraugus Creek enters Lake Erie near the eastern end of the lake, about 45 km southwest of Buffalo. The West Valley site is underlain by two aquifer zones, neither of which can be considered highly permeable. The upper aquifer consists of surficial, gravelly deposits. On the west side of the site this unit consists of alluvial fan deposits; on the eastern side, it consists of fluvial, gravelly or sandy deposits. The thickness of these surficial deposits ranges fecxa about 1.5 to 6.0 m. The second aquifer zone consists of a zone of decomposed This sha19 and rubble at the contact between the overlying till and bedrock. zone is generally less than 0.5 m in thickness. The groundwater flow patterns pertinent to the site relate to the recharge and down gradient movecent for these two aquifers. Groundwater in the surficial urit tends to move in an easterly or northeasterly direction from the western g boundary of the site, close to Rock Springs Road. Most, if not all, of the grounowater in this unit discharges into Frank's Creek or into small tributaries of that creek. Groundwater recharging the weathered shale and rubble zone will tend to move eastward toward the thalweg (locus of the lowest points in the cross section of the buried valley) of the buried valley, Once attaining located about 300 to 350 m to the west of Buttermilk Creek. the thalweg, the direction of groundwater movement would shift to the direction of the thalweg, about north 25' west, and proceed toward the northwest. 9
-COM005222:154H 18 l
l 1 l
O A.2.1.3 EFFECT OF NEAR8Y INDUSTRIAL, TRANSPORTATION, AND MILITARY FACILITIES . There are no nedeby industrial, transportation, or military facilities that will affect the safety of Project operations. No major industrial activities are located within 16 km of the West Valley site; the' nearest major industrial activities occur in Buffalo and its surrounding communities. There are no nearby military facilities. The site is located in a rural area about 50 km south of Buffalo. Road access to the site is from Rock Springs Road; the nearest major highway is State Route 219, located about 3 km to the west. A spur off the Chessie System provides rail access to the site. O s i l O
-COM005222:154H 19
a rm tj A.2.2 RADIOLOGICAL IW ACT OF NORMAL OPERATIONS The doses to off-site individuals from normal operations will be small. The results of environmental monitoring programs indicate that, with the exception of concentrations in surface water and fish, radioactivity in samples collected from the vicinity of the center could not be distinguished from that which occurs naturally or has been deposited by fallout from weapons testing in the atmosphere. Although small concentrations of radioactivity will be discharged during the course of Project activities, concentrations in air and water will be well within the concentration guides of US DOE Order 5480.1 A, Chapter XI: the resultant doses from these releases to the surrounding population will be of negligible consequence for human health. Occupational doses are carefully monitored during all stages of Project activity. Doses will be maintained with Project goals which are below guidelines provided in US DOE Order 5480.1 A, Chapter XI and in compliance with US DOE's "As Low As Reasonably Achiev'able" (ALARA) philosophy. .There wilA be () no significant radiological impact to workers during normal operations. 1 O
-COM005222:154H 20
~ __ _ ,
A.2.3 RADIGIAGICAL IIFACT FIIOM ABIIORMAL OPERATIOIIS Process upsets or operation of equipment or facility beyond design limits are considered abnormal operations. Abnormal operation does not include accidents, which are addressed separately. The radiological impact from abnormal operations will be somewhat greater than but similar to impacts from normal operations. The potential abnormal impacts for each operation will be identified and discussed in the individual process-specific SAR modules. ()
-COM005222:154H 21
A v' A.2.4 ACCIDErrS FROM ONGOING OPERATIONS AND PRESOLIDIFICATION DECONTAMINATION As a result of accidents associated with - n 6oing. activities at the Center as well as those which may occur during presolidification decontamination activities, radioactive material could be released from the site and the general public could consequently incur a radiation dose. The important factors affecting the environmental consequences of postulated accidents are the chemical and physical behavior of the radionuclides, the efficiencies of the effluent treatment systems, and the dispersion mechanisms in the environment. This section summarizes the radiological impacts associated with accidents postulated to occur from operation of existing facilities at the Center and during presolidification activities. The radiological impacts are given in terms of the doses to the maximally exposed off-site individual. Additional details on the accidents analyzed and the methods used to predict the dose to the maximally exposed member of the general public are given in appropriate sections of this document. f( ) In analyzing postulated accidents, it is first necessary to estimate the radiological source term for each accident. In some instances, a given initiating event (e.g., tornado, earthquake) can cause several types of accidents. In such instances, the accident involving the largest source term was analyzed. This was done to envelope the consequences of similar accidents with smaller source terms. A.2.4.1 ONGOING OPERATIONS Seven accidents associated with ongoing activities at the center were analyzed in this safety analysis. They are: [1] Design basis earthquake resulting in the failure of lagoon walls; [2] Design basis tornado resulting in airborne releases from the lagoon systems n \>
-COM005222:154H 22
[3] Uncontrolled liquid release from the lagoon system; (4] Main vent HEPA filter failur.e; and [5] Three waste handling accidents:
- a. FRS resin tank,
- b. FRS filter media tank (normal loading), and
- c. FRS filter media tank (maximum loading).
Detailed descriptions of these accidents and the assumptiorm made to estimate radiological impacts are provided in Volume II, Section B.9. The radiation doses to the maximally exposed individual for these seven accidents are summarized in Table A.2.4-1. The largest dose would result from the design basis tornado passing over the lagoon system, mobilizing contaminated water and particulates and transporting them off-site. The dose from this accident is estimated to be 35 mrem. Except for the uncontrolled 11guld release from the lagoon system, the dose to the maximally exposed lh off-sito individual from the other six accidents will be smaller than the dose from the design basis tornado accident, but on the same order of the magnitude. The uncontrolled liquid release accident from the lagoon system will have a dose so low that it will be undistinguishable from natural background radiation. A.2.4.2 PRESOLIDIFICATION DECONTAMINATION Six credible accidents associated with presolidification decontamination activities were analyzed. They are: [1] Mixing of incompatible chemicals; [2] Spill of contaminated 11gulds; O
-COM005222:154H 23 L
[3] Loss of local airborne contamination control; [4] Segmentation of equipment not chemically decontaminated using a plasma torch; [5] Fire involving contaminated clothing or combustible waste; and [6] Fire involving plywood overpack of a large process vessel. Detailed descriptions of these accidents and the assumptions made to estimate radiological impacts are given in Section B.9.0 of Volume II. The radiation doses to the maximally exposed individual for these six accidents are summarized in Table A.2.4-2. The dosias resulting from accidental releases of radioactivity during decontamination activities will be less than 1 mrem. Doses this small would be undetectable from natural background radiation. The doses from these accidents are small since the existing ventilation system is assumed to remain operational. O
-COM005222:154H 24 e
(O G' TAB 12 A.2.4-1 ESTIMTED DOSE TO THE MXIMLLY EXPOSED OFF-SITE INDIVIDUAL FROM ACCIDENTS ASSOCIATED WITH ON-00ING OPERATIONS Accident Type of Release Dose (ares)a Natural Phenonena: Design Basis Earthquake Resulting Liquid 3.6 in Failure of Lagoon Walls Design Basis Tornado Resulting in Airborne 35 Airborne Release from Lagoon System Uncontrolled Liquid Release from the Lagoon Liquid 3.9 x to " System Main Vent HEPA Filter Failure Airborne 21 Waste Handling Accident FRS Resin Tank Airborne 3.6 FRS Filter Media Tank Normal Loadiitg Airborne 9.8 Maximum Loading Airborne 23 a Effective whole body dose equivalent O -COM005200:158H
O TA812 A.2.4-2 ESTIETED DOSE TO THE MEXIELLY EXPOSED INDIVIDUAL FROM ACCIDElffSa ASSOCIATED WITH PRESOLIDIFICATIGI DE00lrfAMINATION Accident Dose (aren)b Mixing of Incompatible Chemicals 2.0x10~4 Spill of Contaminated Liquids 2.0x10 -5 Loss of Local Airborne Contamination Control 2.0x10 ~l Segmentation of Equipment Not Chemically 3.6x10 -2 Decontaminated Using a Plasma Torch Fire Involving Contaminated Clothing or 3.6x10 -7 Combustible Waste Fire Involving Plywood Overpack of a Large ~0 3.6x10 Vessel a All releases are airborne releases through the existing ventilation system. b Effective whole body dose equivalent. . -COM005200:158H
[ ) A.2.5 CouCLUSIous Consideration of the site and design-related data presented in this safety analysis results in the following principal conclusions: [1] The site characteristics, including anticipated natural phenomena, are compatible with the construction and operation of facilities to implement the WVDP. 9 [2] There are no nearby industrial, transportation, or military facilities in the region that could adversely affect the safety of operations at the Center. [3] The procedures presently in place to maintain portions of the Center not directly related to the Project will keep releases of radioactivity from the site well within established Federal guidelines and as low as reasonably achievable. 'U (4) Decontamination of facilities (principally the large reprocessing plant) required for use by the Project can be safely implemented in a manner which will have a negligible environmental' impact. a 0
-COM005222:154H 25 a
REFERENCES FOR SECTION A.2 U.S. Department of Energy, DOE Order 5480.1 A, Environmental Protection, Safety and Health Protection Program for DOE Operations. O O
-COM009222s194n gg
O A.3 0 SITE CHARAC7 ERISTICS I O i l i l 0
-COM005222:1541i 27 i
4
, , - - - - - - - - - - - . . - - - , . . - . . - - - - - - - - - - - - . . - - - . _ . , . - . - - . . ~ - . - - - . . , - - . - . - - - - - - . - , . - - - - - - - - - - - . - - - - . .---,---a.- -
A.3.1 'GEDGRAPHY AND DEMOGRAPHY A.3.1.1 SITE LOCATION The WVDP site is located in Ashford Township, Cattaraugus County, New York, at coordinates 42.45'N and 78.646*W. The UTM coordinates are 4,702,310 metres N and 692,730 metres E. The location of the site with respect to major natural and manmade features in Western New York State is shown in Figure A.3.1-1. Details of the site vicinity are shown in Figures A.3.1-2 and A.3.1-3 The facility is 3.8 km southeast of Cattaraugus Creek at its nearest approach. Cattaraugus Creek forms the boundary between Cattaraugus and Erie Counties, New York. Buttermilk Creek, a tributary to Cattaraugus Creek, is 0.8 km east of the plant site. The nearest village is Springville, New York, 0.8 km north of Cattaraugus Creek and 5.6 km north of the plant site. A.3 1.2 SITE DESCRIPTION A C) The WVDP site (officially termed the " Project Premises") is on a plateau at approximately 420 m above Mean Sea Level (MSL). Details of the site topography, water bodies, and roadways with respect to the site boundaries and exclusion zone are shown in Figures A.3.1-4 and A.3.1-5. Buttermilk Creek flows through the site vicinity from southeast to northwest. Site drainage is toward Buttermilk Creek. The topography within several kilometres of the site varies greatly, from less than 5 percent slope to over 25 percent slope, with 5-15 percent slope predominant. Within 2 km of the site, slope exceeding 25 percent is common. Terrain in the site vicinity reaches elevations of approximately 650 m. O
-COM005222:154H 28
The exclusion zone surrounding but not ine' l uding the site consists of the WNYNSC owned and controlled by NYSERDA, and is officially termed the " Retained h Premises." By Cooperative agreement between NYSERDA and US DOE, NYSERDA shall not use or authorize the use of the exclusion zone in a manner which interferes with US DOE carrying out the waste solidification project, and US DOE assumes exclusive use and possession of Project Premises (the site) for the purposes of carrying out the Project and for no other purpose. In carrying out the Project, US DOE agrees to comply with all legal requirements applicable to its participation in the Project. It follows that NYSERDA shall not authorize the use of the exclusion zone in a manner which interferes with US DOE's compliance with the US DOE-US NRC Memorandum of Understanding (46 FR 56960, November 19, 1981) which would require delineation of an exclusion zone around the facility. During the term of the Project US DOE shall, by agreement, provide general surveillance and security services for the entire Retained Premises and the WVDP site facilities. Rock Springs Road, a county road, traverses the exclusion zone west of the WVDP site. Access to this road can be controlled by Cattaraugus County authorities. An agreement between the WVDP and the. County will be made to restrict access along this road if required by an emergency situation at the Project. A.3 1.2.1 site Boundary The New York State licensed low-level waste burial ground (currently inactive) is located within the site boundary but is not considered part of the Proj ec t. There are no activities conducted within the site boundary and exclusion area which are incompatible with the waste solidification cperations. 29 9
-COM005222:154H
r .
'I \ '
,a f s
[D U A.3.1.2.2 aoundarles for Establishing Effluent Release Limits The OSR limits on the release of gaseous effluent, including the milk exposure pathway, will be met at the boundary of the exclusion area. A.3.1.3 POPULATION DISTRIBUTION AND TRENDS Population distribution is an important parameter in the calculation of i impacts associated with nuclear facilities. Such data are used as input to various dose assessment codes to determine off-site radiological impacts of routine and accident releases. Typically, these codes calculate population
' ' tones out to a distance of 80 km. Because the WVDP may be operating into the
~~
1990's, population estimates will be needed up until the year 2000. The fdllowing section provides such data and discusses their importance. v A.3.1.3.1 Current Population The area within 16 km of the site lies within Cattaraugus and Erie counties.
)
The 1970 and 1980 resident populations of populated places within this area are presented in Table A.3.1-1. The populations of New York and Pennsylvania counties within 80 km of the site are presented in Table A.3 1-2. Cattaraugus County is a predominantly rural county, 3,460 sq km in size with a population density of,24.7 persons per sq km. This relatively low population density is characteristic of rural-agricultural communities. The County population occurs primarily in rural residential areas and villages with populations less than 2,000. There are two incorporated cities in the County: Olean (population 18,207) and Salamanca (population 6,890) located 43 5 km southeast and 32 km south, respectively. The county contains 32
' townships and 16 villages.,
. ) *
()
^
-COM005222:154H 30
Between 1970 and 1980 Cattaraugus County population grew from 61,666 to 85,697, an increase of 4.9 percent. This increase, while not large, exceeds that of neighboring Erie County (-8.8 percent) and the average for New York State (-3.8 percent) during the same period. It also exceeds the County's population growth from 1960 to 1970 (1.8 percent). Erie County, population 1,015,472, is not as homogeneous as Cattaraugus County. The southern third of Erie County, near the WVDP site is collectively termed "The Southtowns." It consists of rural townships in which the-population is concentrated primarily in small villages and along roadways, much like Cattaraugus County. Traditionally, the majority of people residing here worked in agriculture or nearby small industries. This contrasts sharply with the City of Buffalo and surrounding metropolitan area which dominates the northern portion of Erie County. Overall, the County is experiencing a rapid population outsigration. During the decade 1970-1980 the population of the City of Buffalo declined by 22.7 percent. The Southtowns generally have not had the same experience, and several have increased in population such that the population decline was held to 8.8 percent' for Erie County as a whole during the decade (U.S. Bureau of the Census, March 1981). lll The nearest village in Erie County is Springville, 5.6 km north of the plant site. Springville had a 1980 resident population of 4,285., a decline of 1.5 percent from 1970. The only other village within 16 km of the site is Delevan,14.5 km east-northeast, which had a 1980 resident population of 1,113, up 12 percent from 1970. The nearest hamlets are more than five km away. Since unincorporated hamlets do not have defined boundaries, population statistics are not generally available. The West Valley area, approximately 5.5 km southeast, is estimated to have a resident population of 600, making it one of the most populous unincorporated places in Ashford Township. e 0
-COM005222:154H 31
O b A.3.1 3 2 Population Distribution and Projections The population distributions and projection were prepared,by a computer model (DEMOG2) and are based upon U.S. Bureau of the Census population data. These projections are stepped down to the local by a ratio technique. The model, DEMOG2, was originally developed for use on nuclear power plant projects (Greenberg and Krueckeberg, 1973). Supplement A.3 1-A details the assumptions
'o n which the population projections are based.
A.3 1.3.2.1 Population Within 16 km The 1980 population within 16 km is 17,460, and is projected to increase to 18,472 and 18,718 by 1990 and 2000, respectively. These represent population increases of 5.8 percent and 1.3 percent for the next two decades. The current population distribution for the area within 16 km of the plant site is, shown on Figure A.3.1-6, and tabulated by distance and direction in () Table A.3 1-3 Population projections for this area are shown on Figures A.3.1-7 and A.3.1-8, and are tabulated in Tables A.3.1-4 and A.3 1-5. J A.3 1 3 2.2 Population Between 16 km and 80 km The 1980 population within 80 km is 1,683,065, and is projected to increase to 1,731,932 and 1,767,277 by 1990 and 2000, respectively. These represent population increases of 2.9 percent and 2.0 percent for the next two decades, respectively. Tne current population distribution for the area between 16 km and 80 km of the plant site is shown on Figure A.3 1-9 and tabulated by. distance and direction in Table A.3.1-6'. Population projections for this area are shown on Figures A.3 1-10 and A.3.1-11, and tabulated in Tables A.3 1-7 and A.3 1-8. \s
-c0M005222:154H 32
These projections assume that the migration experience of the period 1970-1975 lll will apply to the projection period, but this high outmigration may abate in future years and result in populations greater ,than those presented above. Sudden shifts in economic policy, energy costs, and other unforeseen factors could conceivably alter the migration pattern significantly over a relatively short period of time. Although it is doubtful that migration would be reduced to zero during the projection period, the zero migration assumption is used to produce a second set of population projections shown in Tables A.3 1-9 through A.3 1-12. This is considered less likely to occur, however, and this set of projections is not included on the figures (maps). A.3 1.3.3 Transient Population The transient population around the site includes transportation, daily and seasonal transients. The first two categories are insignificant and therefore are not included in the population distribution and projection figures above. The seasonal transient population is associated with the area's
~
numerous small recreation sites. Where significant, this transient population is included in the distribution and projection figures. A detailed discussion of all of the transient populations and how they affect distributions and projections is given in Supplement A.3.1-B. A.3.1 3.4 Population Density Population density (persons per square kilometre) averaged by distance from the site out to 48 km is represented by the density curve shown in Figure 3 1-12. The caximum 1980 density occurs between 32-48 km at 61.4 persons per square kilometre; and the maximum density in year 2000 occurs between 32-48 km at 69.5 persons per square kilometre. 9
-COM005222:154H 33
e 77 A.3 1.4 USES OF NEARBY LAND AND WATERS A.3 1.4.1 site vicinity Land use Surrounding land use within 8 km (5 miles) is predominantly agriculture. The major exception is the village of Springville in Erie County, approximately 5.6 km to the north. Other major nonagricultural land uses in the site vicinity are as follows: Residential Hamlet of 5.5 km southeast West Valley County Forest 6 km south Campground 8 km southwest The dominant agricultural activity is related to the dairy industry, with () meat producing animals occurring on a smaller scale. In order to produce spatial distribution of dairy and meat production for a small area, such as a the area within 16 km of the site, the land area which is suitable for agricultural activities related to this production must be known. Averaging production by all of the land area in a county distorts the picture by including lands which are clearly not suitable (i.e., water bodies, forests and old fields, developed land, and steep terrain). For this reason, they are excluded from consideration in the present analysis. Basically, two types of farmland are considered important for the spatial distribution of mill: cow and meat producing animals--cropland and active pasture. These determine the carrying capacity of the land with respect to livestock grazing and the production of feed. In the site vicinity, these lands are identified from several sources. The 1967-1978 New York State Land Use and Natural Resources O
-COM005222:154H 34
~
Inventory (LUNR) for the site vicinity is shown in Figures A.3.1-13 and A.3 1-14. Recent site visits and a comparison with 1980 aerial photography and 1977 Cattaraugus County land use data indicate that little change has occurred since these were developed. The number of dairy cows in the site vicinity is estimated by distance and direction, producing the distributions shown in Figures A.3.1-15 and A.3 1 -16. This estimate is based upon county statistics on dairy cows / meat producing animals obtained from the 1982 U.S. Census of Agriculture and local agriculture extension service data, and estimates of agricultural lands as described in Supplement A.3 1-C. These data indicate that in the site vicinity, dairy cows occur at the rate of approximately one head for each 4.4 ha of active pasture land / cropland. Meat producing animals of all types occur at a rate of approximately one head for each 4.6 ha. Meat producing animals include cull cows, heifers, calves, beef cows, sheep, and lambs. The distribution of these animals is shown in Figures A.3.1-17 and A.3 1-18. Agricultural production statistics are available for counties, but are not disaggregated by township. However, the amount of cropland and pastureland h for each township in the site vicinity is known from Soil Conservation reports. For the purposes of this analysis, it is assumed that the quantity of cropland and pastureland in each tcwnship is proportional to each township's share of county agricultural production. Production and sale of the important agricultural commodities (with potential for uptake directly or through .he food chain) in Cattaraugus County and the estimates for site vicinitt townships are shown in Table 3 1-14. Some of the townships shown are o'nly partially within 8 km of the site; therefore, the data tend to overestimate agricultural activity in the site vicinity. Concord Township in Erie County is excluded since Springville occupies a major part of the (small) portion of the township's agricultural land that is within the 8-kilometre (5-miles) site vicinity. 9
-COM005222:154H 35 e
4 Annual milk production per cow averaged 5,035 kg in 1980 in Cattaraugus County (N.Y. State Crop Reporting Service, June 1981). Approximately 1 ha of cropland was required to produce 7,258 kg (dry) of food annually for each head, of cattle. Most of the silage and hay crop produced locally are consumed by the local livestock population; therefore, much of the reported " cropland" actually serves the same function as " pasture" (Ryder,1982). This is supplemented by concentrates (feed) purchased from other sources, an average of 6 kg per cow / day for New York farms in 1980. Towns located entirely or . partially within the site vicinity (8 km) produced 6,3.97 ha of corn silage and hay crops in 1980, sufficient to support 6,320 head of cattle, which could in theory produce a total of 31.75 million kg of milk at the (above) average production of 5,035 kg per head. Table A.31-14 indicates that actual production in these towns was closer to 27.4 million kg. Agricultural lands which are cultivated to produce fruits and vegetables are not as pervasive as the cropland / pasture devoted to dairy cow production. Fields also tend to be smaller and are not distributed in proportion to the () occurrence of farmland in general; rather it has been determined that fewer. towns contain disproportionately larger shares of these lands. The distribution of these lands in the site vicinity relies on estimates of each town's share of its county's (Cattaraugus and Erie) productive lands, which were provided by County Agricultural Extension Agents (Nelson 1983, written communication; Deibel 1984, personal communication). These lands are, however, assumed to occur in each sector, in direct relation to the proportion of town land contained within that sector. Crops include lettuce, cabbage, broccoli, spinach, snap beans, tomatoes, sweet corn, potatoes, grapes, and apples. Total land area devoted for this produce in Erie and Cattaraugus Counties is estimated at 4,152 ha and 939 ha respectively. The estimated distribution of this land in the site vicinity is shown in Figures A.31-19 and A.3 1-20.
-COM005222:154H 36
-Q-- , -- - - ,,- e ,-- - w e 1
Supplement A.3 1-C contains further information on uses of land in Cattaraugus lll and Erie Counties. A.3 1.4.2 Community Facilities and Institutions The area is rural and there are very few places in the site vicinity where people are grouped in large numbers except for the schools and hospital which serve Springville and the Town of Ashford. These are described in Table A.3.1-15, and the locations are shown on Figure A.3.1-21. A.3.1.4.3 water Use Upper Cattaraugus Creek extends from Springville to Gowanda (32 km downstream from the site), and lower Cattaraugus extends from Gowanda to Lake Erie (62 km downstream from the site). In March,1974, NFS conducted a survey to confirm land and water use in and near Cattaraugus Creek from the confluence of Buttermilk Creek to Lake Erie. That survey concluded that land use patterns downstream of the alte are primarily rural. No public water supplies use Cattaraugus Creek as a source of water, and the Creek is not developed for organized water contact recreation activities. Fishing occurs primarily near the mouth of the Creek at Lake Erie, and to a much lesser extent at the Springville Dam. Boating is generally limited to the stretch of water within 3 km of the mouth of the Creek. Occasional canoeing occurs at Zoar Valley west df the site when water depth permits it. O
-COM005222:154H 37
A.3.1.4.3 1 Lake Erie Commercial Fishery Recent information on commercial fishing in the New York waters of Lake Erie is contained in the 1984 Annual Report to the Great Lakes Fishery Commission's Lake Erie Committee, by the New York Department of Environmental Conservation (NY DEC). The following, unless otherwise noted, is abstracted from this report. The commercial fishing industry operating today in New York waters of Lake Erie is a fraction of the fishery that flourished in the latter part of the nineteenth century and the first half of the twentieth century. That fishery concentrated on the deep-water fish community and reaped bountiful harvests of lake trout, lake herring, lake whitefish and blue pike. By 1960, the high-value species of the deep-water fish community had been eliminated or drastically reduced in abundance by a combination of overfishing, environmental degradation and the expansion and naturalization of exotic fish populations, primarily rainbow smelt. The deep-water niche became occupied
/~' primarily by amelt, which are now the target of a major commercial fishing
(._)) industry on the Ontario side of Lake Erie, but not in U.S.~ waters. Since 1960, New York commercial fishing effort has focused on walleye and yellow perch, which are the most marketable components of the inshore fish community. The relatively deep Eastern Basin, which includes all of New l York's Lake Erie waters, does tiot provide inshore percid habitat comparable to ! that found in western Lake Erie, so landings of yellow perch and walleye from New York were usually never more than a small fraction (less than five percent) of total Lake Erie landings for those species. The loss of the deep-water fish community from commercial production and the switch to yellow perch and walleye resulted in about a 75 percent drop in yield to the commercial fishery.
-COM005222:154H 38
The commercial fishery in New York's Lake Erie waters is in controversy because of conflicts with sport fishing interests, primarily because walleye and yellow perch are highly valued by both the sport and commercial fisheries. More recently, the by-catch of trout and salmon in gill nets fished for yellow perch and walleye has become an increasing concern of sport fishermen. These conflicts have resulted in mounting pressure to ban the use of gill nets entirely. The economic and political significance of sport fishing is expanding as sport fishing interest and activity grows throughout the. Great Lakes region, including New York's Lake Erie coastline. Future commercial fishing in US waters of Lake Erie, particularly with gill nets, is uncertain. The NY DEC has made proposals for research and development to facilitate transition to nongill net fisheries for underutilized species such as suckers, freshwater drum and carp. According to NY DEC policy, sport fishing is the paramount, "best use" of fishery resource, but well controlled commercial fishing, when compatible with sport fishing,'is a desirable use of that resource. Future regulatory action h by NY DEC pertaining to commercial fishing in New York waters will depend upon determining the effect of commercial fishing on the fishery resource and/or the sport fishery. Commercial fishery regulations instituted in 1980 established a closed season for gill netting from March 15 until the first Saturday in May and limited gill netting effort to waters greater than 16.5-m (55-ft) deep. In 1982 a moratorium on the issuance of new commercial fishing licenses was established. In the absence of funding appropriations to permit development of alternative commercial fisheries, the moratorium will likely remain in effect. ( l 9
-COM005222:154H 39
/~T t 4 '# Table A.3.1-16 summarizes commercial landings from New York waters of Lake Erie during 1983 In this year the harvest totaled 126,684 kg (279,290 lb), taken under 13 fishing licenses. In addition, an estimated 2,460 trout and salmon were caught incidentally in the commercial fish nets; 83 percent of the trout were two years old. A.3.1.4.3.2 Lake Erie Sport Fishing The NY DEC conducted a limited creel census between June 20 and September 11, 1984, at Dunkirk Harbor and Sturgeon Point, New York, two popular fishing locations on eastern Lake Erie. Because of the limited scope of the survey, it is not possible to accurately assess the full nature of the nearshore Lake Erie sport fishery based upon the data provided by this survey. The total catch was undoubtedly greater, by some accounts as much as 5 to 6 times the catch recorded by the survey. The survey results (1984 Annual Report, NY DEC) indicate 10,717 shore angler () trips during the period, and 14,006 boat angler trips at both locations. The overall catch (all species) at Dunkirk was 10,951 fish, and a't Sturgeon Point 15,284 fish. The species caught include walleye, yellow perch, and small mouth bass. The average catch is approximately 1 per trip. A.3.1.4.3.3 Cattaraugus Creek Sport Fishery A creel census / angler survey was conducted by NY DEC on Cattaraugus Creek from September 10 - October 31, 1982, to assess the fall stream fishery for coho and chinook salmon (Lang,1983). The results, presented to the Great Lakes Fishery Commission's Lake Erie Committee,- conclude that catch rates for all species are very low and that most fishermen are local. It is suggested that a major reason for this is the time lapse between stocking and a major spawning run resulting from that stocking. Because the expanded stocking program for the Lake Erie tributaries only began in 1982, the major spawning runs would not be expected before 1983 or 1984 The salmon caught during the G k.)
-COM005222:154H 40
course of the 1982 survey were probably the result of a relatively small stock of 75,000 coho introduced into Lake Erie tributaries in 1980, 75,000 chinook h stocked into Canadaway Creek in 1981, and strays froa plantings by other states. The study report anticipates that future stocks of these species, and consequently the catch rate, will improve from the 1982 level as the effects of an expanded program are realized. However, the results of a 1983 Cattaraugus Creek electrofishing survey indicate that while the run of chinook I salmon in Cattaraugus Creek was encouraging, the run of. adult coho salmon was disappointingly small in view of the large number (138,600) that were stocked in 1982. The reason for this is not clear. The 1982 creel survey provides the following estimates of Cattaraugus Creek salmon sport fishery: Number of Angler Trips 13.348 Angler Hours 41 ,296 Average Fishing Time, Upper Cattaraugus (hours) 3.3 Average Fishing Time, Lower Cattaraugus (hours) 3.0 Coho Salmon Taken 1,5 49 575 g Chinook Salmon Taken Average Salmon per Trip 0.16 Average Length (mm) of Coho 582 Average Length (mm) of Chinook 720 A comprehensive year-long creel survey of Lake Erie and the New York tributaries, including Cattaraugus Creek, was conducted during 1984. The results o'f this survey will be made available during 1985, and will include other important sport fish species occurring in Cattaraugus Creek, including trout.
-COM005222:154H 41 9
O TAB M A.3 1-1 LOCATIONS AND POPULATIONS OF T0lalS AhD VILLA T.S PARTIALLY OR TOTALLY WITHIN 16 KILOlETRES OF THE SITE Population Town / - Percent Village # Distance / Direction 1970 1980 change JS Ashford -- -- 1,577 1,922 21.9 Concord 4.8 N 7.5 73 8 ,1 71 7.9 Springville 5.6 N 4,350 4,285 -1.5 Sardinia 6.4 NNE 2,505 2,792 11.5 Yorkshire 5.6 NNE 2,627 3,620 37.8 Delevan 14.4 ENE 994 1,113 12.0 Machias 6.4 ESE 1,749 2,058 17.7 Franklinville 12.5 SSE 2,847 3,102 9.0 E111cottville 7.7 S 1,779 1,677 -5.7 Mansfield 12.0 SSW 605 784 29.6 East Otto ' 4. 8 .SW 910 942 35 Otto 12.0 WSW 731 828 13.3 Collins 12.0 WNW 6,400 5,037 -21 3 North Collins 14.4 NW 4,0 90 3,7 91 -7 3 V('\ TOTAL ALL TOWNS 38,737 40,122 3.6 a
- Village populatioq,is included in the respective town.
Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census , March 1981. l i I l l O
-COM005238:160H i
I
(s * *.w
*". I. (~
- O,. ~
.\ .g . e y * .
t .
.., g
; . g ;f, l
{ ,
.~ _
z ( 'r I.
"y, /
N. s. g.
. j
-[
x {'s , J
- +.
. m. ~<N . g{s. .:,w-,\ 1. . .
Q.!p -Q.w-4 -_ _i C s.. .#s .-
. t sm na
!.ke' '. .,
nN Nj. $;
,. v" P.
f s]- m.
-h -
I f i . r
* +- - _,f. 4
} g ><
,?,,,)
j ; i
.\. .
. % ,.s . .,
'**p,I sDRANCLE N.s l l
.I N,
. .. 1 y
,,,ma t-s j . yI r.-
w-) \ is '
- " ~ ~ -
{\., \\ ~k
, \
r . ,0 l 8 t ..... I
~l ,y I,. ? ' .
D[
- ~ .. . . . . . .
~_j]'
, ,(
s ,, ,[ C O. .,l C S.. ',R') "D / \ g
! 4 s, P .s
..~ . 6s .
s ,y s o/
/ s
.a g
- s ,s* .
e ,
- Q.. .
l :. ; \- -e -
.g.
[, 4 dhf' 1
,. / g .
,[
( (~
')
*'s.~..-
AO:'}\ d I s s .- l
. ., sr .{
c-
.m s
$ '\..g y
r
.~ f g, .
.i / .
/ ,;% s
-o
- , \ l Cp t
'h'\ M W. .
t c y\,., 2- s. t .
.1 -
; . ~
t '
\ *
.x y- , . a -
N .r,- '*. Q* ,. v-
,, l \ .
t, y v - co - ~ - r.. . . , . 3
*
- N g
.s . 1 / 4, ,4-,
)
- l' x
N r y ) .__.J 4
/ s.
- s i, ,
# k. s
/ e
\
3 N . 'N <f..-[ ? .j y i l 5 <[ \
,. '. s ,
y- i , . . . ( \i
\ ~. ,
,/ .-
..l ,' h +f'~\ .- L a _ ,\[ ,- .
- - \---~ - h[; \ s- j
_ ,- ~ g.,-. . . *
~,
.. y ,r
,4-Q..~~..g. ., ., . , . . . . .- . _ ,
_-3 g -/. n 7
- -~ A s N =\ a r
,-.),'
ll. \
\ , I q N *~\ " ' _31J '
- k. .x _/ " 4y\
s.
\r. . -
g i.
/.. -
, N : s a. ( .,.-l -
i.s 4
' ^/ p h *'
/
s
\
');'
- t 3
5 j '
, s
- 2. f
~ '
- s 'N g _
,]
r s sf -
,2 N, j- /
*** I ,- % /
r-{ - ., [ s
- ,e
.i I s i
\
s w
,b ,
(. , N,
,-)' .
l 2000 0 2q f ,
REFERENCE:
1 5 l NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION i 7.5 MINUTE SERIES PLANIMETRIC QUADRANGLES: l ASHFORD HOLLOW, SPRINGVILLE, COLLINS CENTER,
- 1 WEST VALLEY, AND SARDINIA. !
e
~~ ~
- )
g k. .\ f^ k
'\
- t 4
'\
' (5 .* c-
*y_* *h
/ f,**,, W e e ..
s ..
- g. d w ll",9....
- p. ; _. -
s s
*2, i
p e- ia**=,==,~ '
'i ,,
( / *< . . 1
.s ~y. . ,
t
-r I - ,
t,&* 4 o '
~ s' 's.
\ p)..-.r~ W
.s t.
'~ '
[.e, N f ' Je
,d 1
*l, on. ] * ' * '
/
*.~.,;,7 s ,.
N ... .} *
-- . . .. a .. _ .
, , .i .
q.., . . As eoao v g
/-%r49,nj ,
- a'
; ; ( s
.- . . p.
't-(' N s._/ ,
s-t \ 5 1
- h. -
f f$ .-
- .," .)1 I
% g*g i !
N
.f ) s j .1 . .,
[
-~ ' \ t 3 .,- -~ ,,
\*
.\
f ~
\
, s N
\ :
J
\ ,
4.-a \ N I
4 s /
% 's '
. ; ,g 5,./
L __ /2 --- _ ( y ) 1 -
'~r p .
\ .
- cp.,=;; ... \ yy~, __%., 1 3
- g
..c. A. $
. g
\ j ._
s . J s j g s s g s _ .:e ,
., y s., ,- g NL'
( - N
- I 3
T -
\ .s. , I j (;
e \
- p. \ .. %. l ; . __ ,
* ~' .
4
- i A y ,o
.I y. I .
"/ y i t,,
A 1
. Il g
( %. l p.5( [lI f .
\ *
. E . \ ,
/ %'
i ..~.a= l .
/j jl I
[-f-
' *' pgj ,
i
\
I
/[I
- k. . q ' I .
# a \ l ,
oI l j , t ) !' '(* { } hlTE
.W.~ >
~~
N~I h( j . /' [ I , E f b *.* $ #/l k f G ,,,,, a ?s ( :
?
.G*. :
J \--gp g i 9 S c ,.. gL. N , l- ' l I 's - I
. g ,
b.. .-r.j) , .... . ,,. ... . %,. .' 5E
- 1
, , % a 5
- N l
./.
- e. .,~ . , .
u I
~ n r, c,
-s,-- v,s I \*
\ e., , s, -
^
o
. */ - '
J
;, 3 _.
Q
% 2 ..
[d' ., - y_sg
= 'X ,
,00 sooo FssT
' Apert *" 8 5 07 0 8 0 4 41 -j 4000 SITE VICINITY MAP o i xitonersa g NORTHERN PORTION gg333.
I CARD FIGURE A.3.1-2
.i
/
. 1 O -
TAB M A.3.1-2 POPULATIONS OF COUNTIES IN THE 801CILOETRE SITE REGION
& NW YORK AND PENNSYLVANIA (1970 and 1980)
Population County 1970 1980 Percent Change New York 18,241,391 17,557,288 -3.8 Cattaraugus 81,666 85,697 4.9 Erie 1,113.491 1,015.472 -8.8 Allegheny 46,458 51,742 11.4 Wyoming 37,688 39,895 5.9 Chautauqua 147,305 146,925 -0.3 Livingston 54,041 57,006 5.5 Genesee 58,722 59,400 1.2 Niagara 235,720 227,101 -3.7 es Steuben 99,546 99,135 -0.4 U Pennsylvania 11,800,766 11,866,728 0.6 Warren r7,682 47,449 -0.5 McKean 51,915 50,635 -2.5
. Potter 16,395 17,726 8.1 Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census , March 1981.
O
-COM005238: 160H
/
4 i '
,. i \: . ; , _ . .3 sq;. . .. +/ T .t7, x ;-c -.
- -S,- -A >
/
[ vi . . . I .. . . . ./ 1
*- t
/
>. \ *
#\
\s
;~ r
,/
- h,
!s' '
I
-. ] \ :,
\
/
{. . . i s._
. o - (
O/' _ .L_- ,y
/ .s.g. .v.
- i. .- - .. .
\r. s - - .
3 * ' '
'%'3 ,~
s l 3 J- + ", \ . l
.h -1 .'x' -
% [ es I \
I 3l. . ..
..se"=--
f ,\
- 'l - .s s 1 l - - ,I
['( ._- '\ l , e- . N . lI N
\
n ,y. x ,
,, N, g
- l "'.
.j t f l : \ j '
, I ~
\' h l )
/ .. / s - 4. < '\,A H F 'O
, . /.
- I ,(I .
- \
- p-_'"5' ,
,. .- - \ t. __.,
i I~ \~ / k'""***. f
-w '
~ Qs
/. .
yp-,. ' ( ( '" -
,- \
, s. ,L_.<4 N
/ A___e \ / - - -
\0;
{ s'
g
/ , ,f . - p %
I ~ j ./
"" .I , .f. \ l D a, hq (' /
i >
,g \ .
N, $ s
- - , ,,~.s,., .
""3~*I.
. ~
s s J ,' g,,..,,.._ '**
*j'lo N.7 :s
?I h
~
/ g g I \
' ' * / y .y' l l_ /l . .
.~h. <"% -
g !.:., *=~e\\'I h / f g ( g f /
/ "" ,-
4 . ./ g- / - l '\ l- s> .
"7 _
.. j \ y ja. ;/ s.
)
\1f. E A /S T Oi T T O I ,/ T.
f N
- % i 4 - /---
.- o I g)
\ '
,'{ .
) --
. E
)
\ / **
' \
' c=
f ,,
' ,\ / " ' ~~f o lI . / ,
m.s i :- e, y
,- / r. -
,. . ,s '\r.
. . . . . . . . J. .) .
, . i
...t r \.
-. c t -
/l I o.
/ \
. . - - t . / , ; ,
l - t n .
.s)
,lf ,
'* ""r ; l 1
(
/ .' ' t.I f
-"],,,*y' : ~h
% i l .
l . V .. .
, ,, /.. j
't
. -% l i
j
$ '*~ - %m \6 i
. . , , , ~f
,'
- h i
l w7
- MV b
- g', l - '
w- -, . / / ; . 1
~
u
/
Y( a. n. .. N2' - ,(/ , J ig
- f e" l
.. o.. y
.. N.l ~ % ,- -
\s -. ,
4, . ... c-y,- - t
- I
/
e -
.., s
- I # l
/.- -- -- - ..
\ .
ar._
. - - 0 I .
\ ,
,'*/ . 8 ( l / **
f ~ ~
- l. ls
# l l
(**_ll,w,i \
' . .p, .
%4
*k? or '*
/
L------------***----r-l / s yg I a rs a . . l' -' A E r - y - u .- _ .
'f f ,,,/
O \, [,,, '/, - 4 ,- g ,( ; 'l g 2000 0 2 i . I
REFERENCE:
5 NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION l 7.5 MINUTE SERIES PLANIMETRIC QUADRANGLES: ASHFORD HOLLOW, SPRINGVILL, COLLINS CENTER, k- WEST VALLEY, AND SARDINIA. l.
# ..J
;;.,N o .' --p h,-
\ .s N' -
' J ' ,*
i s f SITE ' __ 4x<*g % ,* #_
, '>Er , s l
,,, I r -) -
'Ow, & yl
\
g ./ ,., j b 4,%'.- - ..
!, ["
-~
.Q* / j
--- g [ l i i / \ s t
- Cr** L%
l g 7 %(,\ j i,_ _) g 4 W l
,, I, s ,
g' p/ \
- s .
I J
. . %.,. n.
f^
~
...o
. f ,l
-)
v --c,. l
/r &.aNg N
N
\""' /
!p f,
/ f e
's . le p .-/ l s L j
@b p g ( ; , ; ~ <
l "
/f/
R N
\
N ,o i
\
g
\',_s).
j .
' \ ,.
j
*=,,
/
'N n h \patT'"
l' L
\.r#
8
/ S, 1 .- \s \ .Q .
l
\ q .s-.
d , i
's- o ,A ,, t -,,7--
- , it II i .
~
* ,f
- I
~- ,! .
\* I; .
_ , . \f ; El \ / II .
\ _. -
y ,,
----------L- 3 . .;
9f. ([
\* ' I I E',/ tr \ e
- T.
\
s. s s1 ~
. "k "~
\ l ,
,5',-.
i
'~'
! ,3,,
g,- *
\ J s
.,p j ,, _._ .. .
1, , - . g,, i f,
? y /, v"'
~
. W,. - I * '
\,
Y I h,ij " s U-J ~~ % / it
\ * ' ' . ., , I ), +5 / q v .-
- '-i. . .' v-
, s
\ ..
#', li .
.. - [
\
I s '.., p. s s :.
\. f '
N "" y
\
# 'Y ',-
g ( N .' ' ' .,c . h.. r,. . f hf\ g I
~
\
( 0 F~. N' 3,
/ -'
\,
r f. y- ./ , ...... .p I _ --
.y
[ g
- l . Cx ,..u.:,-}{ - c R I T , s.
, _ _j;;;;;;d t, i
....-w s
;- '/
g g ( N 72'
/ N' , . 'qt,_;' s.a., *@,4 \ l s. .:- ."*.:
/
/ \ 's
\ 'N,
\
- ,' f i 's
- j I
\/ :-4. u. 4) ~% , l '"'
- l
_rs y / - I
/ N \. . .
I, e
' I N s
- g. ', a ' '"
- N
- Y~ \ '
N';
r 'S '**' '-. d V' *,' I
/
D
~> '\ '~ \ %, }
' ' ( ' *:' #
,., .O i :* - l r-Q
~ ~- ~.%
*I
\'. ,i
' = -- . '. J., . \ ,
. t t r
R-
's, ,
& (' {).. 2 i ,y-l" s .- f y.- -ei
="'-- - t h \.,, . h . . -
~ I t i t r s i( \\ j
; .yT 'c:e. .m-i.,, i 1- '
i [ i t .>e % I o y \ ~N ,s M-:*.*.;p. .~ -/ s l
/ I
'<r s'gl g f \
r
,,L -a.. o s
\
~ .^ / \ l p.')'~. -; . -: . .
1 ',. e i wr:-- 3 i ( .... t a F 29 l s\ t ~: @-~.h. j C _~ ' N-- -- [-- s- _ _ '. S.f* % ..o s s _ :.r_. e,,
. -=.. <-y ' n l. 1' ,
k.
~
z p
&d
\~
\m .~.
i
.'i*
e.
,,. .E
.w.
- ,I I c' e /
==4.,
E LL CCTT YlLL E} .
'.(
e ELLIC . V II.L t
. j v., s#;' Is
- e. J l
.1 w i 'o AvattaMe O f1 >> /*2e e s
r Rperturo Cardf 000 4000 6000 FEET I, , i I KILOMETER TI SITE VICINITY MAP l0' ' SOUTHERN PORTION APERTUBN CAW J
- FIGURE A.3.1-3 f I
l i 8 5 0 7 0 3 0 4 41 "e-- 7 - J
TABLE A.3.1-3 1980 POPULATICII ESTIM&TES BY SECTOR WITHIII 16 KILO 0ETRES OF TIE SITE , Fertility Asseption: 2.1 Chil & en Per W aan Migration Asseption: 1970-1975 Migration Trend i K11 metres (Miles) 0-1.6 (0-1) 1.6-3.2 (1-2) 3.2-4.8 (2-3) 4.8-6.4 (3-4) 6.4-8.0 (4-5) 8.0-16 (5-10) 0-16 (0-10) Sector Total N O O 29 71 0 2,0 51 1,301 4,541 I NNE O 15 47 28 49 402 541 ! NE O 13 3 48 31 ' 831 926 ENE O 24 8 74 19 1,987 2,022 E O 39 100 64 85 1,040 1,328 ESE O 8 58 31 24 1,290 1,411 SE O 4 23 438 58 198 721
- SSE O 3 37 64 38 160 302 l S 0 14 17 33 49 422 535 l SSW 0 5 12 1 41 38 295 491 SW 0 7 25 28 40 440 540 WSW 0 10 23 27 57 294 411 W 0 27 57 39 16 259 398 WNW 7 34 19 23 14 348 445 NW 0 27 9 65 36 559 696 NNW O_ 3 22 430 1,204 721 2,380 Total 7 233 489 2,243 4,259 10,457 17,688 Cumulati ve 7 240 729 2,972 7, 231 17,688 Total
-COM005238 :16011
t . (
~ -
r. l t tj s ... .. ... ! 1 s i ,. //f ' ,-L'._.... .
.. , , ~ ,,i ~.
l
. . .I ~.s--
N. s' i
' .A 1J/
o 9 g o;
) a :
- g. s ~. r, a
e {.
. ~ . .~ . .
L 6- .: y e. - nw 3" es,
,1.. 7
$[ .!.t/2 '( .
8A ..fTlk '. - 15] \x '. i .(-/ : 7
-I d
l (\-
- ' -/
-, gg ( .
)
'g
, i
\ n <
\... \-
,- 5
[/-{
'4 , Y...\.
(-.
,xx
.; m
. s.
< \ . , /..- .. .Q ,
[ l
.4 ..'
-d..
f... - . g~ t'l., ' + .. t/ h ../ ..' ( ._-. ) g / . -: I- e.oe i
,... -/ "N .
E. ..s' l
) N.
'N, il 9 ,
"/ h.,
hg .+,
- b. *p .h.,
h l r-to {u; . 3y t t 1 f
' ^ '
,f g sj2 js
,[, , ..,
?L., ,
j <s
- m. + 4 ~5 : 7' - -
(-
<. s. 1
./ ,
)*
b l ) s . -
, 4 .
. . eI ,. h pttermilk ,p>d \ i,' .
.P ~i .~ [
j
,- . o
.v- .
(A - 1 n, . ,_ f g
\ ,
.. " e - -
/ - l .
i,, N * '
- p!
I
~
.- s'
- ?
W:j '
' 4
....... .*- - . 88 -. . i \
~~~~
" j I .
E
\ -
a., K .
., . \
- we J' ..
- u.s s S e
yv @ *~%...-
.I. .
a
/* .j i * . . l ,3 .
t
REFERENCE:
NYSDOT, 1975
3! E (.- t k /. y s
\
,,/ -^
4 g ,IJ , 6 -.l,,'ir
. ,i .i creek NI /.f x.
i. a a e. '/ 5 y..y -~up, /'s.
.** 4 Tj ' !
ia N - U ./ err, i./ 5 -
^ .
i '
.+ . .g , ' ,,
-q$ -
Also Available O'n j,o- z attermilk ,
/
'N I
' Aperture Caru i
o .t - i
/ s yrs - ,/ .
,> '.y W i f '
b TI
/ Ef f'*I I .N.
APERTURE
..ww c' \ p s - \.. c..s . . . _ . .
8- CARD N - y . I
)}.:. =v
_l
- . ('f * .
g_
/, I * \, j 'N- .
l'$'
\ '\ l% ~~ o-J N 'j N.
.N. ,I'g
- 1. . .s ,. [' \,
s* [ t. : i N. :c y>
'N KEY. .
- 5. \
j -
'd .
- f'
- ___ PROTECTED AREA
/
J- - -
\
s - .
.\ . .. .J SITE BOUNDARY
*iiE EXCLUSION ZONE
= .! / BOUNDARY s i -
,/
4 eT'uU ,.
\.
<,/
a - 7
\' s'~'.' /
) 5 / SITE BOUNDARY
. . 7':4 ,/ AND
.(e, in./ , . _ _ ,/ EXCLUSION ZONE 9;. '
.a e -
8507030441- 3 7 FIGURE A.3.1-4
O O O TABtE A.3 1-4
^
1990 POPULATION PROJECTIONS BY SECTOR WITHIM 16 KILODETRES OF TIE SITE Fertility Asseption: 2.1 Children Per Wasan Migration Assumption: 1970-1975 Migration Trend Kilometres (Miles) 0-1.6 (0-1) 1.6-3 2 (1-2) 3.2-4.8 (2-3) 4. 8-6. 4 ( 3-4 ) 6.4-8.0 (4-5) 8.0-16 (5-10) 16 (10) Total Sector O O 29 672 2,369 1,486 4,556 N NNE & 15 46 27 54 432 574 O 12 3 47 32 90 8 1,002 NE i O 24 7 75 22 1,938 2,066 - ENE O 38 98 66 100 1,326 1,628 E O 7 56 33 32 1,71 9 1,847 ESE SE O 4 22 429 56 239 750 SSE O 3 36 62 37 167 305 0 14 17 32 47 424 534 S 0 5 12 138 37 277 469 SSW 0 7 25 27 38 41 3 51 0 SW 10 22 25 53 291 401 Wsw 0 W 0 26 56 38 15 288 423 WNW 7 34 19 22 17 357 456 26 11 76 43 645 801 NW 0 3 23 408 1,099 845 2,378 NNW O_ 228 482 2,177 4.051 11,755 18,700 Total 7 cumulati ve 7 235 71 7 2,894 6,945 18,700 Total
-COM005238:160H i
t
~ 'a
(
, R= fr& -
' 'q '
l Q\ _
% ~~-
v~
% ~~ _R r~ 2
\ . r ,s
.,,,n v
S *.,/ - ' 1
--4.4-: x ,u
" Q ::e
' Ithi25 c.*
.b ~
j ' [ 'k Y\I@hy[e jjd y
@)
r 17 7:iw%m e^=k R hf d
/
m=fl vM.e w; m'h y Kk n>y ' ayJ =.. .:=
\ x
, . = ~'b, c
? m rz,
$ ) 9 ; _
Y-(a5:. ' ' V); v /h4 p , ,hi . c.[s ,' acEniesh-
j' 11 . y , . <Y , f(
w
// '
, , f,t> ~. ~ .r I
l,b :N, I i,, o mA i) x. e.o x-
,)f,,-l,n((
r% ,
~~Q']- .
~
r
$.W:A=rL;M's,q.y
.*c/ g,n
' {' I *::,yj,k a
7
,-. ~ .. ~~
j sj'$r ... m . . 4 g,oit , =
=.=
~
- m. =
e _ _ _ __. w=w ch &
= r_
E = ===== - - w oTo g[. ._ _. r:
\
I,
1 1,
-, .. s -
"['p,(
\ ..
s' ,-~ s'.a***'...,,,
-x
.m
- a..'%n.L.D...F.E.N O
. C..E..'U.fE.P
.............ma.
- *
- b 's.y$ ","' ' ' ~
+
- y. & ; % J; 'N.* ' ' u-w
,, (%
1 , ) .
' s' ;
\ .) $, - . ~> .
l f , y' -.
' s_ :
O*b ~ ( m
~
I', O I a. ( 4+ 4\ .) -
- a* . , ,
js [ Mejb M
\% M 9 [ p -.
a
- ss .,
gy ; Y f .
;y , o -
.:.y o '
l .. 3 y m " ' ---- np : p
- r 4 -- .,
.-} +.
.! ,' ~' g' L,', i -
, ~.EU A K."A. .M E A
_ , , .q [s 'I t ... _, , 7-V t , sm . , -. ; ;- 4,4, c , -.
.J' 8 % ;, ._~-Q.. ...:::- ..
jh, . QQQ":g.
'% ' n .
M f... .c o -- } .. p } Q, s
,. z4 -
y-3 p-- [.m, y-n n . .
'g vy
\e j~ pa Q :u y, , .
- :. /- y 91 N / '9 sUpuAL AREA ;' ,I f/l ) [
h,, ,,3 0k %'?pq., i J }? l _J 7
$(.s }i
~
; ' d 's a s F j _. _. m- K[ n~'3sg fr W l l ?ng~-w S ~ :;] lg r.. a $gnN~ ..
Y. ,.f.ki.-i J' o.
- 4 ,,' x'v. .;,' %..m:g]A/
W c, :!)/~ ,' '
- r Rs f,
- y a as ',' . - .
0 QE - "' s v !/ , t "o.-. v&s P;
.% ,}
.f< f r- oyA
,_, ~.
a .:.x,. ~s';Jy' h<,); <% %-- lM - :\ m 1 a a. ,c
. .-- s
-s9 4' s - e-
? ..
~
'\ f N
} ~
.. ' r
~
-( ['--
6 }
~
l.. - P W & n % Q p % d f f f[ ? : 4 , 4 .- R - 9 _.
% TOPOGRAPHY AND DETAIL OF THE PROTECTED AR ,m FIGURE A.31-5 7 8507030 441 q
() ~ o) o Q TABLE A.3 1-5 2000 POPtK.ATION PROJECTIONS BY SECTOR WITHIN 16 KILOBETRES OF TIE SITE Fertility Asseption: 2.1 Childr en Per Waan Migration Asseption: 1970-1975 Migration Trend K11 metres (Miles)
- 4. 8-6. 4 ( 3-4) 6.4-8.0 ( 4-5) 8.0-16 (5-10) 16 (10) 0-1.6 (0-1) 1.6-3.2 (1-2) 3.2-4.8 (2-3) Total sector 649 2,288 1,583 4,550 N O O 30 48 28 55 428 574 NNE O 15 1,069 3 49 37 967 NE O 13 2,429 8 84 27 2,285 1 ENE O 25 1,639 103 75 124 1,296 !
E o 41 1,426 1,564 O 8 59 35 36 ESE 21 4 753 O 5 23 452 - 59 SE 174 320 38 66 39 sse 0 3 50 429 546 s 0 15 18 34 146 39 282 485 ssW 0 5 13 28 38 422 521 sW 0 7 26 25 54 300 412 . WsW 0 10 23 418 28 59 39 15 277 W 0 441 20 23 18 338 WNW 7 35 686 853 28 11 82' 46 NW 0 2,372 25 395 1,038 911 NNW 0 3 2,21 0 3,963 12,018 18,946 Total 7 2 41 507 2,965 6,928 18,946 Cumulati ve 7 248 755 Total
-COM00238:160H
...g
( _ TABLE A.3.1.-6 1980 POPULATION PROJECTIONS BY SECTOR WITHIM 16-80 KILODETRES OF TIE SITE Fertility Assumption: 2.1 Chileen Per Mcuan Migration Assumption: 1970-1975 Migration Trend Kilometres (Miles) 16 (10) 16-32 (10-20) 32-48 (20-30) 48-64 (30-40) 64-80 (40-50) 80 (50) Sector Total Total N 4,541 17,312 58,936 164,115 79,047 323,951 NNE 541 5, 81 4 7,884 14,611 29,676 58,526 NE 926 3,520 3,582 11,765 11,799 31,592 ENE 2,022 4,782 2,442 12,515 15.377 37,138 E 1,328 1,851 4,274 2,120 7,598 17,171 ESE 1,411 1,290 3,462 6,451 20,161 32,775 SE 721 3,022 5,925 5,789 5,789 5,742 SSE 302 963 27,222 9.478 7,989 45,954 S 535 3,328 8.430 27,006 4,280 38,579 SSW 491 2,584 4,908 2,120 18,999 29,102 SW 540 2,668 5,481 13.458 55,247 77,394 WSW 411 1,877 6,171 7,639 11,026 27,124 W 398 6,184 3,334 33,811 8,255 51,9 82 i' WNW 445 4,833 13,582 0 0 18,860 NW 696 9,1 51 21,185 983 22,090 54,105 NNW 2.380 14.547 173,055 407,341 158,810 783,133 Total 17,688 83,726 349,873 718,123 4fi9,563 1,638,973 Cumulat i ve 17,688 101,413 451,287 1,169,410 1,638,973 j Total
-COM005238:160H -
l
%J D 0(m TABLE A.3.1-7 1990 POPULATIN PROJECTIONS BY SECTM WITHIN 16-80 KILODETRES OF THE SITE Fertility Assumption: 2.1 Chil@en Par Uman Migration Assumption: 1970-1975 Migration Trend K11 metres (Miles) 16 (10) 16-32 (10-20) 32-48 (20-30) 48-64 (30-40) 64-80 (40-50) 80 (50)
Sector Total Total N 4,556 17,930 64,992 184,287 94,036 365,801 NNE 574 6,236 10,071 15,196 30,500 62,577 NE 1,002 3,742 4,300 11,712 13,609 34,365 ENE 2,066 4,895 2, 41 3 12,959 16,014 38,347 E 1,628 1,682 5,028 2,170 7,834 18,342 ESE 1,847 1,235 4,079 7,249 21,747 36,157 SE 750 3,836 7,041 6,0 83 5, 92 0 22,630 SSE 305 902 29,324 11,529 8,534 50,594 S 534 3,5 51 9,481 22,673 4,5 83 40,822 SSW 469 3,159 4.836 2,278 18,877 29,0 9 SW 510 2,7 91 6,372 13,917 57,614 81,204 WSW 401 2,029 6.327 8, 61 9 13,152 30,528 W 423 6,857 3,554 34,193 7,787 52.814 WNW 456 4,977 13,471 0 0 18,904 . NW 801 8,885 21,927 980 22,477 55,070 NNW 2,378 16,287 176,539 375,015 189,398 759,611 Total 18,700 87,994 369,755 708,880 512,082 1,697.391 Cumulative 18,700 106,694 476,449 1,185,309 1,697.391 Total
-COM005238: 160li
TABLE A.3.1-8 2000 POPULATION PROJECTIONS BY SECTOR WITHIN 16-80 KILODETRES OF TIE SITE , Fertility Assumption: 2.1 Chil e en Per Woman Migration Assumption: 1970-1975 Migration Kilometres (Miles ) 16 (10) 16-32 (10-20) 32-48 (20-30) 48-64 (30-40) 64-80 (40-50) 80 (50) Sector Total Total i N 4,550 21,040 75,611 223,854 117,576 442,631 NNE 574 6,585 11,781 16,093 31,071 66,104 NE 1,069 4,029 4,817 11,920 15,005 36,840 ENE 2,429 5,460 2,452 13,206 16,864 38,347 E 1,639 1,7 84 5,628 2,207 8,039 1's,297 ESE 1,564 1,279 4,475 7,443 24,280 '39,041 SE 753 2,844 7,884 6,218 6,268 23,041 SSE 320 929 30,615 12,946 9,099 53,909 s 546 3,756 10,145 22,814 4,687 41,948 SSW 485 3,411 4,659 2, 41 8 18,496 29,469 SW 521 2,908 6, 94 8 15,082 59,997 85,456 WSW 41 2 2,136 6,826 9,827 15,230 34,431 W 418 7,308 3.778 36,531 8, 924 56,959 WNW 441 4,649 14,740 0 0 19,830 NW 853 9,157 25,398 985 22,832 55,070 NNW 2,372 19,221 177,701 333,236 197,580 730,110 Total 18,946 96,496 393,458 714,780 555,948 1,779,628 Cunulati ve 18,946 115,442 508,900 1,223,680 1,779,628 Total
-COM005238:160H
f3
% \_)
~
': TABIE A.3.1-9 _m 1990 POPULATION PROJECTIONS BY SECTOR WITHIN 16 KILODETRES OF TIE SITE Fertility Asseption: 2.1 Chil&en Per Woman M18 ration Asstasption: No Migration Ellometres (Miles) 0-1.6 (0-1) 1.6-3.2 (1-2) 3.2-4.8 (2-3) 4. 8-6. 4 ( 3-4) 6. 4-8.0 ( 4-5) 8.0-16 (5-10) 16 (10)
Total Sector O 33 782 2.756 1,6 91 5,262 N O O 17 53 31 63 503 667 NNE 14 3 54 38 1,057 1,166 NE O 28 9 88 25 2,256 2,406 ENE O O 45 114 77 117 1,542 1,895 E 66 38 37 2,000 2,150 . ESE O 9 SE O 5 26 499 66 297 875 SSE O 3 42 73 43 194 355 S 0 17 19 38 55 453 582 0 5 14 1 61 43 322 545 SSW 0 8 29 31 44 480 592 SW 0 11 25 29 62 339 466 WSW 65 44 17 329 486 W 0 31 WNW 8 39 22 26 20 416 531 NW 0 31 12 88 50 750 931 3 27 475 1,279 984 2,768 NNW O_ 8 266 559 2,534 4,71 5 13,595 21,677 Total cumulati ve 8 274 833 3,367 8,082 21,677 Total
-COM005238:16011
- \
'(D
() . (~\ V TABLE A.3.1-10 2000 POPULATION PIMMECTIONS BY SECTOR WITHIM 16 KILODETRES OF THE SITE Fertility Asseption: 2.1 Children Per Woman Migration Assumption: No Higration Kilometres (Miles) 0-1.6 (0-1) 1.6-32(1-2) 3. 2-4. 8 ,( 2-3 ) 4. 8-6. 4 ( 3-4 ) 6. 4-8.0 ( 4-5) 8.0-16 (5-10) 16 (10) Sector Total l N O O 38 821 2,896 1,942 5,697 NNE O 20 61 36 70 542 729 NE O 17 4 62 47 1,224 1,354 4 ENE O 32 1 01 106 35 2, 891 3,074 E O 51 1 31 95 157 1,641 2,075 ESE O 10 75 45 46 1,804 1,980 SE o 6 30 572 75 284 953 SSE O 4 48 84 49 220 405 S 0 19 22 43 63 477 62 4 SSW 0 6 16 184 50 357 61 3 SW 0 to 33 35 49 534 6 61 Wsw 0 13 29 32 68 380 522 W 0 35 74 50 19 3 41 51 9 WNW 7 45 26 30 23 427 558 NW 0 35 151 103 58 868 1,079 NNW 0 4 31 500 1, 31 4 1,152 3,001 Total 7 307 643 2,798 5,019 15,070 23,844 Cumulati ve 7 31 4 957 3,755 8,774 23,844 Total ,
-C014005238 :16011
O (~) O f'.)\
% G -
TABIE A.3.1-11 1990 POPULATION PIMMECTICBIS BY SECTOR
%ITHIN 16-80 KILOBETRES OF THE SITE Fertility Assumption: 2.1 Children Per Woman Migration Assumption: No Migration Kilometres (Miles )
16 (10) 16-32 (10-20) 32-48 (20-30) 48-64 (30-40) 64-80 (40-50) 80 (50) Sector Total Total N 5,262 20,862 75,621 214,426 109,415 425,586 NNE 667 7.256 11,718 17,681 35,488 72,810 NE 1,166 4.353 5,003 13,628 15,835 39,985 , ENE 2,406 5,695 2,808 15,079 18,633 44,621 E 2,150 1,958 5,850 2, 525 9,115 21,343 ESE 2,150 1,437 4,747 8,435 25,114 41,883 SE 875 3.299 8,1 93 7,0 71 6,570 26,008 SSE 355 1.050 34,119 12,868 8,975 57,367 S 5 82 4,106 10,970 23,912 4, 81 9 44,389 SSW 545 3,650 5,565 2,438 19,851 32,049 SW 592 3,247 '7 , 41 4 16,177 66,251 93,681 WSW 466 2, 361 7,362 10,029 15.303 35,521 W 486 7,97 9 4.136 39,785 9,060 61,446 WNW 531 5.791 15,674 0 0 21,996 NW 931 10,338 25,513 980 22,477 60,239 i NNW 2,768 18,951 205,412 432,334 217,306 876,771 i Total 21,449 102,333 430.105 817,368 584,212 1,955,695 i ! cumulati ve 21,677 124,010 554,115 1,311,483 1,955,695 ( Total l I
-c0M005238:160H
O O O TABLE A.3 1-12 2000 POPULATION PROJECTIONS BY SECTOR WITHIN 15-80 KILODETRES OF TIE SITE Fertility Assumption: 2.1 Children Per Woman Migration Assumption: No Migration E11ametres (Miles ) 16 (10) 16-32 (10-20) 32-48 (20-30) 48-64 (30-40) 64-80 (40-50) 80 (50) Sector Total Total N 5,697 26,624 95,675 283,254 148,775 560,025 NNE 729 8,333 14,907 20,364 39,316 83,649 NE 1.354 5.098 6,095 15,083 18,986 46,616 ENE 3,074 6, 90 9 3,103 16,712 21,339 51,135 E 2,075 2,257 7,1 21 2,793 10,173 24.419 ESE 1,980 1, 61 9 5,663 9,41 9 30,407 49,088 SE
~
953 3,598 9,976 7,854 7,360 29,741 SSE 405 1,176 38,739 15,448 9, 81 3 65,581 S 624 :1, 71 2 12,737 24,757 5,055 44,389 SSW 61 3 4,275 5,795 2,678 19,948 33,309 SW 6 61 3,6 80 8,792 19,055 74,562 106,750 WSW 522 2,703 8,637 12.435 19,272 43,569 W 51 9 8,0 82 4,760 46,224 9,267 86,872 WNW 558 5,883 18,652 0 0 25,093 NW 1,079 11,586 32,138 985 22,832 68,620 NNW 3,001 24,321 224,855 412,927 244,954 910,058 Total 23,844 120,806 497,665 892,256 682,059 2,214.360 Cumulati ve '23,844 144,650 642,315 1,532,301 2,214,360 Total ,, 1
-c0M005238:160il
O O O
, TAB E A.3.1-13 ESTIMATED PRODUCTION OF SEMCTED AGRIQJLTLEAL ODt90DITIES IN CATTARAUGUS 00 LAITY AND SITE VICINITY TOlmS 1980 Production Cattaraugus Ashford East Otto Yorkshire Machias Commodity County Tmnshi p Tanship Ta nship Tanshi p Milk (1,000 kgs.) 146,010" 7,9 90 7,020 4,780 7,640 I
Cull Cattle 5,800 320 280 190 300 Calves 14,500 790 700 4'70 760 Corn, Grain (hectares) 3,300 180 160 110 170 bushels 762,600 41,71 0 36,680 24,940 39,880 Corn, Silage (hectares) 5,140 280 250 170 270 bushels 184,150 10,070 8,860 6,020 9,630 Oats , Grain (hectares) 2,300 130 110 80 120 bushels 324,900 17,770 15,628 10,620 17,000 Hay Crops (hectares) 28,880 1,580 1,390 940 1,51 0 tons 124,320 6,800 5,970 4,060 6,503 Hogs and Pigs 3,775 210 180 120 - 200
" Equivalent to 40,237,500 gallons Source: New York State Crop Reporting Service, May 1981, April 1982, June 1982; Cattaraugus County Cooperative Extension Service (undated); Robert J. Ryan, July 17, 1982.
-COM005238: 160H
__ _ _ _ - _ __- _ _. __________m ____________m_ _ _ - _ _ - _ - _ . - . _ _ _
D TABIE A.3 1-14 USER POPULATION OF SQiOOLS AND HOSPITALS IN TIE SITE VICINITY Facility Location Population Springville High School 7.2 km north 93 4 Springville Midde School 7.2 km north 631 Springville Elementary School 7.~4 km north 736 St. Aloysius Parochial School 6.7 km north 235 West Valley Central School 6.1- km southeast 530 Bertrand Chaffee Hospital 6.9 km north 55 Source: Hilde Rothfuss, Springville-Griffith Institute Central School District , Written Communication, July 28, 1982. Sister Marion Rose, St. Aloysius School, Personal Communication, August 19, 1982. Loretta Shuster, West Valley Central School, Personal Communication, August 19, 1982. George Vasiliauskas, Bertrand Chaffee Hospital, Personal Communication, August 19, 1982. l e l O -COM005238:160H l
kut t. y - \ ) >
!o M' f0f. v
's 4 , i
*/
e
*M
.- s a
~
a e H C OLL' NS
+/s, , I\
3' I 43rew%'602 6^ hi \d
& "A ' \ ON !
- S**"'* Arc
- g
/jhf4~K.b.
/
n
\ h %.% ff[K'M i yejF 6 f
*' x '
E 'n
_e ud OI LIN. ,, 348 3 3, 47 8 48
,,,, ty M
^
{, 23 0 i3
.6 3 i, fOAKS" h j
'"f s ij 8
N
@l l {
W a, 16 9 $7 r 7 . 9 soo 1060 E
,,,,,,,,, /
\/CATTl M "50 0
lo ,
$ , 3 a
58 Y. !' - tQ
}7 ,, ,
'! ",p
, s,,
,,t^S'/o ,o
,6i "s, "'"
U OTT / ta*{N 38 4 38 g, ,ag , s / ' i \ i,8
- g. . . . . .
l s nid - g , o"*
,,,ff x..v _
/
\
160 N (dX3 422 at**** . g Y w w== NEW @ i c retLE 850 M A N S F t E '. D Sh d-E
- g 1.c.a *
- , .f i i u ,
5 r1 5 MILES L_ 8 0 8 KILONETERS w w -i 1980 POPULATION ESTIMATES SY SECTOR WITHIN 16 KILOMETERS (10 MILES) OF SITE O FIGURE A.3.1-6
3u s 'uE' 8
;jO 'T, 1* & ,, . ?
4' 4 u naw)e T ,>
* .9 0 S / 5 /
b b s t.ngford 5
.e T 4~
16K r e 9l O s"** e R 'H C 0LL' NS gf3 486 x__ _ I . h- s > 8 f) 632
'e
\
- ~ / \ "?? My /
,.% ~
s 7 V f's' a~, %#fAp+6 Mk'~, % s ne (7 C0i LIN. ~5 3 t y . 7, g7
,i g
,2
'938 ygAKSH IRF f- y pp
\" Il gg ' n f5, 3 22 /,
A W ~' s I & \
's !88 15 6 98 Y,ico,n 1326 ,. E [
M 56 . v *9 by,%(g a j y33 7
, 'a ; ,6 5 3 l
$3 5 2 32 u.c, . -
2, it 36 29 EASr ,7 ,,,g SIA 231 8 3 ' 56 p3 y 6 OTT / ,,,,c,,3g 2 g na i ' - 37
,,E 37 , MA iAS is l
/ q
.j .. . . . .. . . . . y /'\ 239 .
O xs e-i N* " bg ( e 2. ('" PKn...--. - .
< e ..
NEW Q tCOff is BlO M A N S F I E '. D s qu FA N K LINv E
$ tu.convae l / ./
4 i M s n / w i i <> < , ss 5 0 ,5 MILES 0 8 KILOMETERS 8{ _ l l l l 1990 POPULATION PROJECTIONS BY SECTOR I WITHIN 16 KILOMETERS (10 MILES) 0F SITE O FIGURE A.3.1 -7 l
j e '&'0{
- Ho**"4 U t. . .
s y h , 9
-y l ,5 f 3
.o-,
j ~~
" i
~
,K e ( ,/ e
- e g c ow e}+ Ns sp1 v' s. a =4- , ,
SAR k , 9 i 628 + rw 7 "e% y f ,/
; ~
/
' - N '- ~
\m e V i S
x, , ( .
&au'kW 7_ j, er E r*
4.. Tj.
.,. Deewe' (m)
_ [h Co*ns Mj ! I e
\
6 f i
- 4. 13 37 i
COI LiN5 I
,)o 2285 s
3)g _, ,,
<ous -
u % 82) 6 }, 84 go W ~)0 , 8 , _ @' {
,' 5 ,A g7
- rir 85 3 28 103 I #2. i296 ~
% bW-"
CATT4
] 3 10 7
8 5s [O
' N k'
' I j),
' ' 6 36 %,, .
i T 33 gg 38 $2 ) E A S T! 28 426 66 , e saiM OTT / E ' 33 3g ML II MA IAS is , / j . 73, zi6 1- N
/ [ /
A
\ \
Otte g r
/ [ 2s N9 ,,
8 i [ . ,,,,.. e t t' (Pltt g M A N S F l E '. D S[t6 @
'E FD N A L,1 N V
** k ,\
%. s
\
Y -
/ . E ncomme
. - w . . _ , ,
k_N ,
,l , ,m ,
5 n 5 M tt', O s. -' ' 8 xitantitRs "6 mm_ , _, J ____. _ 2000 POPULATION PROJECTIONS BY SECTOR WITHIN to KILOMETERS (10 MILES) OF SITE !O FIGURE A.3.1 -8
I t , g E O y W 3 { D CANADA U.S.
..-..u.
_d".78 '""~a-C ..... ,. co. v p. . .... u .O. l . . . l s........ L. ,. . . .o . .; ........ac.~. , ,! .... mt --...............
'a a an , ., . e
.....l,,,
j.. . . ... l
.. t .. .
..!. ; .-~
- 6. . . . . . .; I . , ^.; ', * *-" . 7
-- ..~
8 ,Gfm )l y ....o - i .- .. ..=. j'C ....;..?."7.^'J".,.F . .
, ,y*,* , . l a
. . m. m ,. .,.... .g, , - ,
, - ._ . .1.
tb -'.7-.!'.'.~ 4, 185
- - . 4. yw L
....[ M
,C,*
(- . e. a~
/p . . . .
,.a . ..... .- - ....,o....
s g , M F,!r.L..u >..
,.m , . .....,-i
;{
o " .. - ~ 407.3 W C U'.~ ~ ""~! .*6,1,1, -
; '".-"4 .
22 * **" ~' . g ,. g g, , gy._
\
. ." 2 - . ~- ..~;....
,--4pyp -
~r I
5 ** '
/ "**
......--L. .
- ,".i. . - i
. . . . ;. wyo.ng 70 :3 7 983 . . .. ,,
.,g ., 7f.gl .... , ,. . a i i .,,4 _ . , . , , n J ... s. .. ,- u.j
. . m; - t.. . .. . . . . . . .u
,, ,. i .
g '. n~ t m . c. ; i. -.
- u.;. , 2 U. . . .
0 ,2.,14.5 3582 -- . "3;~,1,5. 3 . . . . .
<=-
g, P . .' '" e , 4.54 . * * " F t
~
"r e
**' 5B+4
o 0 - -- - '
- f .." " '"~&...._a.--515, T !O'., '!
s 3 -.-
.m pg,. ... 3520 -
v ....-<..i 2 m . . !.; . . 82.
... .. .c.u.
s
. m .. -. i ...... . .. .
q.; .
",,,,,..a, 4 -
cm . k782.4. l ' s E*.... . ...:.e - 1.-"-A ,... .... I SIT o.
... .. . eprow c / _
~-
MN~ h .,. W 8255 3N '- - N, ' " ' . _ . , m .... " 3 ~i
. .~..
~ .i , ....,
.. ".. . m .-- -. . ' .. $. ' ... . . '
t
'"-a. . . .
l
..'...a.
s **. g L l
^
u _ , gg7y s i
},,. 1290 I j
......u j - -* l 0""* "
v . .. .a # {..,,,,,****'"O'-"" p. , .. a O s . . a ,. .. g ..w.. "
..... }D 2 2, ,,,.
- 3.h62 a . . . '.i.
/e 3 .. ". . , 3.
7gg"*" "" cia," -
. n . ...i '. t
.. aio..i y
r"
- L 5.*"':i. J u
u..,
" -** . . . . . ~ ......
} 6%S1" 4.,
_3 . l
..... , * ' 5 4 1. ._ '. ... . . l ..! . aun
.u.
c...
; ., .*t i . . . . . . 10 16M." *'
g - ,I.... ,s.... 1,t. s. x A, 2 2,...... .cu .... -.. go-- p.; . ..
-" l '
~~ ...... .. - . . a. . .
-- .a _-7,,...-
a
- . ;, ,, . . .. . ,p 7 ~ 7- .....
,T""!,*.
5- _ y* -.-- . 4h 458 - 4;^.308 f.;;- o'"'ik,4 30y ' 2 7.2-2 ~.5 78 5~' -
~ ' - * ' "
- %-.m , "6"f= ",~., i ... a"
*l,*7,'.u-a,. o.
. n. - T l
!',,s...;Qi "" a. 4- . iO.....d Mi " "" .,...I ' c . . .. AJ 8 -n o-""
6
. ( c.n, r .
c7ho
.!' !- I "-*
r;7. .
., - - . . NF w,cu g . ,m.
Ptsus m
<- v. m,- t - - - _. - - -
m- ._t..,--~ ~ e i
\ \
l [--'-- )1. -----,/ j ,_,, . 40 MR ' s ' o
- ,_ o ,
.J.-4 g 999 _
m;.t_r' ~L _.,P989
.- i-i e;;;;:~-
i t% m m.
.-42 0 .
-- . y .
5 s I -i o - -
- l s. ,i.
'-*"/,*'
( . y .,,,, .i --
-- r.r_c.e_sn__E__ e -
- 1 ,
} vN-l f ;
- ---~ -
; 1 33 l
i 3 . i. -.3 ij-i !
, ,s _. r
- s - - - .
4-.-. l .N I
-4 _
k
/- ,
A i 1 4
N ' 16KM T A y y a g, 4541 , fAlso lvan, Lie on 44
'hpertre Card 926 398 2022 i
...... i
,I,I . -l ... ! w 411 1328 E APERTURE ...T.p. .3
# -- su 14n CARD 0 ,. ..
l i .-
= w.. . . ...,
. .. . -G. . . . . h *4 i
. 49i 72i
- ~4~ i = _...rem .. /l
... e t m i.. < . . . .>a . -- i ... ..v 1 535 302
,s . % n...g #" O. ..a- n j ~.i..... r, no
.s g l* **
- 5 . - .
.2+ 534 S .=* : -
- .J .
i ONONDA' p y mt %D ). :... .:,......,
.= ..._ !
l ;
. .... _j-is . ';.") n. I ( ...o lo attes s
- l '- " ~ - + .si !
i .> 1 r... " '>=o : , . .: .><.... .,.. l - 7 _m_ ohTAfuo cu ; .. . . . . 9_.. _ a":'..a.. ' ,'*"; ~,;'... . :..
- c y~....m.
J --
,.. o. ....r...~ ,. < .
j p. . ... .. -w+ ="'1- "o . ' . ; i T
** sLSEcA co. ,
'**-n=/ . .".~. .~. 'a0 ',(
,,,, 4 e , , , , "...;;.- . . . . .r. . b;........ 'O" *o e ..... a.~..~ [-7'*a-**:......,i .... ......
n .*
- / t .e.
- j .... :-...- A ' ~a.~* ; a a- .
. . . . . . . . , ~ ,, ;- ;
y ,.o : y' ..,..Jrcg. ~ ~- , ,,
......s., ._.FT. r, i. ' = .
1980 POPULATION ESTIMATES
.,.; ......- y ':.q. ~ ~ p c.....
k.....i i
'~~
l ._' f , in.u. Ni
' " M~ i...".......3,~--i : j_ _( BY SECTOR v --=. 9 a.-..
t L. ,. I J ; ; g , , WITHIN 16-80 KlLOMETERS
.........f . ...a u. -
! l 4 . ,
,,,,,,, y9,,....,J;,(10-50 MILES) 0F THE SITE
~~
-l
~
( n.,.'i [ Air.sco.~ * - - ,A ga8."~"..' A*.~,,f........-... ...,,,,,. . - . . . . o. r i f 's . a......t m... _ x; -
,o o, ,0 2,0 i - - - g .. . . I '"** _.
) p.,, 7 ... 5 ,,,
ic ...nl : ~.. ....,....."1-MlLtS
, , c
' a" j 'd'O
- - --- E ~ . .o l .
.- i
-' s TOMPK!.% CO.
ca-- 1,6 0 16 3,9 p
.u -: 7 ~ -q .
.3.. .~.c.~.,m ..: . m.u. u
......... . f -
i r s . -- ..- . q ,nMg,6.R4 .F -
% ( ) '
o.....C i gr , 7.....x.e . r ef.
- -v
. ..... c..... -
UI k,,, !
,,u..r.,, ,, e i {l j, "g - dl ._--e er... -. ...-
_t ..u a . - u. t . v,,. i bf 11. a.=. [1' . .. . . .. . ,...! j; g aa . .+. """1, ..... 5* *S
"***1 l u... ..
d,....... ~~"~~ nues ed '
'-~'.^.,*/ w..5. ! ......Go* -- CouhTT ^
L U l. 6 l
~.' Y I "
- M **UD
.y. ,... "8 = w...... ..n. $'********* ..-,o..,
f ,*n -a'"' 'i M ..u . l l b o... , ==***. . - ........... ,8coaPc,aarto on unmcoapoaaft0
*I M1 F
s'.". . . . N - l Ptact Not a MsNoa Civit 0*vi5'ON INeonPomatt0 oa uM*compoaatt3 PLACE I E. . I '-- AQEMUNGCO ~ '*]** 5 1 3 -. o 3 , "a '- ea r(... ... i "~- l".l.';; -l..W,"w'. I."..l *ita 'tata '~ u sa **^8"5 r
. ,... lI ......__i .
o il iw- p- . . Nv..* s ,",, ... ..
.. u.
3 f
-,4 J.--.g g p.r a ..
&,' . y
..... . . . h . .-
.g ,,,,,, ,,,, . ,
""l r
~..- im sryus
( { ...a..u ,.;-~ .... o ' o "- i,N. .. .. c .8.* l Lg ... .
; . I n. j y ";-l,,~e ... u m scros couhi, j c=.....a -
j .... l 4 .. -. cao waoa cmt om5'oN
... .- i i
, , ,u .^ .. .... " "* y YORK g "* * ***"6"w. . 4 * " r , ' f Washincan 'NCo""oaatto Ptact wita 50 000 [ .. .. . , " On heOat iNHa8ttaNT5 W-
'a^="
""**
- li- - -
AN I A "" l I .4~I 'i INCompoeatt0 PtaCE **TH rewta
- i un.ngt..n l _,,,
"d d .I ** . ~ ~ q. l
- twaN 50 000 INwaeltaN15 C l lJ
~
! .. . a uM*Composaf tD PLACt
- i ~ I, i i.
i l l , i s i I I - 1
~
'( i O ., I
.I !
- .'"3 . . .~,, ""_.~~~.,;A,. : n'-
j- A.
- l '
,M .
I i I G--',-~_'---- N -- -------s MAP
REFERENCE:
U.S. BUREAU OF THE CENSUS. 1970. l FIGURE A.3.1-9 ' 8507030 441-6 s
j
. E Also Available Oag
, f A h.
Aperture Card N d D T1 MERTURE CARD CANADA U.S.
.**'""I oat.tA.ss co. . .. o u
u.ua e yONkog 00.
...,.... ~~ e t
#, CO* ..- c, 1
....- s. -.s . - "
....)-.-- .......j ........ i .. ....
..m y......i........
- ~.... ,..... : ~.~
,~...i,.,
.. 1,, . , ,, ,n
'i ... ~. - _
..x......,.
~
. . . . . . . . J.... . ..
...<-~ 4 .1 i . . . . . , ..... &"' . . . .... . a'.. ..w...h-,
C i fL%m - ' ~ ~
- ~ .;_. _ _.t_ _ ' . *J."'. i"
s,y a. m - ; - l
..o crsr.su ca
,[ .. ... d +-l-' "
s
~ ~..; , .m., ' ~ . . . . . ......c,,,,, ;
;...-. t
.. ... .. ,s 189, 9D 3.
% ~ ,,,, ,.' - "
~ ~
sa - .p.. . . ....... .
; .. .. e
,. o ... t ,..o...
. .. . . . .. . . a
......o 4.,km .; . .... . .;
. ,.. , dg ..gg.
~ ~ - .1 - . . .x i. . . . i j i -- ) o " .. ~ -
37 4a. ,,,,,,2.
- a. 3
": . , 5..Wb
"'.....g ..--43, ,so9.
L ,--
"g aa .~
r /S/N - s .,
- 3 . g y. . . -
. . ...' ..s... !, t;r.s.@U.. i
'"" .',,Y" ' ".5 .
~
..a
...._i5 a..
. . . . .. n . . . . . .
980
*q.
r :a t 74_- - . mi .: ,- ., ;. ..
.32.km. s4~. ' '...... . - -
2.
~
p , . .. . --
" . . 1....' n o' -
n 0 g
.~
- V*W ;.. - -. .
L9_3 6.. 43an .. ; _a k s. ,, . - .. y, p ."'-* ' . . 6 . ., 2.h.l.. H " T-
. ..a g., ..
i .. * ..T" b 0'-*** a ,,".. m.95 *-
"' 1. . .
- . - r _
~ '" _* ' ' ' . . ."~.a i
- s. ........13. ,-
A...r.
... 838S*
" ...Mkm ... .. ' ""
i 2413..i : n P '"
"*" t
* ~~
- s.n.,.. *. i i f , .,, .. r*-!. . 3...
.... s,
- - r-;
- s. ..: .- e co.
- " -F' . .,...u...,- .
I _rm, SIT , o. - . .u .e. ...s... : ~-'
/
.~
~-
W 7787 34 19-T" ".
"M .~ , . ... v '* *
~
......L 1682,- " 50 2 8.,,,,J...Y170 ....
<....T7837
~
i ', ~ ~ ' t
. . . - . . i ....
-.i.,..... .
- - . o ~. .. '
- 'h. .. 4029's i f2'35 8 '
; . . - . - " " - ~ ". .". , *.I
.....i
;, . . , r-~ - '
"- l
. g,- '.. o . /.,4o79 o n .. . <
.j . .
o-.,, i.... .. .. .c..y'. ... U. , c .2 279p: ..-u ......
;i ^'
[T
.e f f ._8pt9-4,,,,
- s. . . . . . . . 2- 0 36 .. --***- **
i ' ' Mg' . ,
,,a
- 1. -
g..o. Ei L P. +ys2....
...l.
~ -~ -
t 3 ..o p g. 35.,.5,i,. e. i W,,, ,;..7.:a, g3 y, N . N .,,. ; ,_...,; -
.g,, n g
i , 6322... eo m. p .sgego....,. ._
... ! ~-.
u 4. - , - -. o
.-~
g - ~ ,....... ..... .N g
,~,.p......., . ..,. .-. y %. -.V,n.E- -
- i ,.
c 4,8 J .. .- f.u . . - M ., ' , .~ !.rc....'r- ."
"'"'*6083..... "
-rt 314 i , , .3. 6..'."<9. .
- . .,.4 o81. r ' .. 2S + -
. . !,m.. . cl;Q
""o....
n * .g
=_
l " .";.fT~ '30 mil.E" ~ - Ii C - .. ""
*"' ' i - NN
. p l h .,)""ia '
c- Du ' Z, 278" J to >r) 7.. ] --$
~
j Ll t,.?C . . r t-
- x ,_ _,.-
,, t. -
[ *225673 1 - 4
, ~ @p-- Pj EN j,N
- ' ,.- c, ,
40 MI -
~ l
.-_ _, l ,- ' "
. , _ 3, I
-. g -.. ,4,.-. tB ,6'7 8534 r' - -
1
- i. '
~ .a . - .. 9s .- i
- , , . _ , -4'5 8., y j-},
( _. o --- , ,. ,,
- - .I -_'. '~
I'- Sty- 1.1 # . -i 0 - '
~ 1 1 i
"",..u, p N-s
_3 .
- .c.- l' -
N (
-- --~
'"h ___ T g . - . !
I. 11
N -,
.. 16KM I A R I O ++ 2378 574 801 1002 456 2066 v..... t w ' . , ' . , . W. ' ,423 .
1628 E
......._j
' A .. 401 1847
" . ... 5.- '\, ' "-
w- *- . r n .s...s o. ... ..' .) 7 510 750
.. : .m.
-..,d u wnst co,e , .. . . . .". ,J
. ... s s. 469 3
.,I. .
i
....s r -- - i - -
534
........,,,,,,,,,*o.~....
*s ' .
./ ......r.
- rarm 9g ... ggg
__.___ ;.c... , i
..--= -A.e-i,-q .. .. . , , ,,.; ...
i
. . ~...4._...+.,-
i .c 20 MILE
- I
-f , as .... .o /
M.
. 8 s a
- ... ...L,"j ..a m o
......... O , j,,, , l . .u -.
".** -.- . .c u a '
u...
. ., n
.3 u'e s"-**
- "'-'". . . . . . . ,", "'". A.o...
.....n. .m
....... s.,.'", ."*"- .
..p="
,s . ,g,y,i
'- ..** s.
/' -
ve On"i
- 3. . . .u. - . ,
.' ..+u c-
~1 ONTARIO CO. , , ,,% , o ~ ,{I ,,'.,,. p . 4 ,,{,,,,
-- ,e-.--- -- ' 5W C - Ji2 . _.;. . . . . . . a,..o m..,. .- 1 :". .....c..:. o . . . . . . . . .,--;,....i....-
. - - - . . - ~ . . . . --
0,...... . . - ~ . . .
.o ,
t... , %,. .s
- e. -A.
c..........
., I --.. ~ . ',,-lll,;-'3, .- .. ,n .6,- ,".:',','.~9 u ,-_. 4 '"(*Y .. W.. . " 1990 POPULATION
__'-'i..=...: ; -1 "'" l p., sK'"l i,-ll- '.~ j C- PROJECTlONS BY SECTOR t.
. i ; i ! .3 ,"c ." ' ' " * " -%
> . .... [ '"""
! / . ... WITHIN 16-80 KlLOMETERS
"']a (l l ...,
... \ eu I I /_ A..-h NATr.sco -
f{ ii
-y e
Y-(10-50 MifiS) 0F THE SITE
. . :. .i
-*...,.A
'ba""r ---
r ji! ! .~ ,. , f. ....uyl . .. , . . . .
."a v
, i
...( _
\; -_ 1,0 0 10 20
.. . . .. . l .. . . . I
- e~
ur Ns,s .... s .. . . .. ; . nm3 s _ i . .o.. . l
'.~, , ....
,:..... Tour m co * ,
_. .. , 16 0 1 s'
~
'-' ' c~~.
, o suun.u J .,. ll: ; .. .. so. -..~.;...'r,
- . 1 l~;... .-
re
\ .. ....
8.""- L - s 7- KILOMETERS t am a) ,,,,,,g,,, i ,U _ , i g
. F".,.*."u*."'. e.
~gi., m, - -.,.e..'.... = . . . . . . . . ,
2 .- > ...... .
- .- n .;c. . "','." .......) % -y ....... i -~ y , .... 5=5
- ..u[..: ?..h..<! 5 --4 . . . . . . ~ .
* " ~ ' ~ ----- exNu V --. . i$= . . . . . . . . . u. c ! "'-" ",l v j ' -
g ' uiNOR Civik Divi $rON
. i u.
- p. I...J'"' M .... l O.....
L%'.au w ', l f """ h l1 I
..a 1 I
n
" "'****'*f ***" " % ----------- .NCOppOS Af t D 08 UNINCoo pC' A tt D PS Att NOT A pin 08 Civit Divi $ ION
,........ , u.. 6
" ] .. o INCO8POR A7(D OR UNINCORPOAAitD PLACt l
u.+ . . ,f.... ,! . . . ... ; u .... - ... . .. .-. i .... n n ... .. b g. 8""l.......,. -- o witw fIwta inAN 2 500 'NM*B'i'NTS
- 4. r* ,2 ' - . .
. .I' v *
(,o~ 9' 'a*"" *
~
e... , ;. .T.*n -a. i i . . . . c.-.... , y c,,.,,,,,,..,,,,,.. e TyN STYtES
"-= . .g 6,,,,,g'g ,,, e sf. y........m '
A . . . ' .. o ' "- i . ... . c .j * ,-* L - ' , - * * * * * = . ' . - - , , , ,
.. waggiNcros CovNiv
'+ ......u l a-..- i #
l w.e. (
/ vs . t .NO.ON u'NOR Civil Division
. . . - . .,.,.j . -.
.~osa <".-
==-- aq ... ., . .
.NConam AitD e. AOc wit so ooo
-u...., t* os poat waartANTS N __ _ '"i -
*- ~ " " ' ' ' " -
TN I A "*"""'-** "-""
- l --.=F*M'ti, w si..i inn #NCo*90A AitO PLACt *IIH II*II
,./ b L, I
~
*=* : C lg **"- f h t iAN .,0 000 INHABIT ANTS
,Q .
l' ',*==- '{ UNINCOsponattD PL A01 _ ,- ------~N.s.----- 6 i 1 . . . . . , _ -j l 2 .
'N
- k
,_ l g l]. __ . c ,
g' , v" 8 5 0 7 0 3 0 4 41 - MAP _, ;- ,4
\
+-
; r- l
- ,-) 7 . -
REFERENCE:
. . . I i ' ' " ' "
U.S. BUREAU OF THE CENSUS, 1970. r lFIOURE A 31-10
}t E O y
# A go Ava.lu131e On 1
b Aperture Card D gERTUE CANADA U.S. CARD
~
. _'_ w_', R.L..r.A.NS CO.
.-""8 i 8y co. . ..... . , . . .A". " "-c .a
; .....a Og CO.
p i s
- 9. (. . ... * . L pc, .. .......,,.,,!, .. .. .
%. , 3 ...
, . . . . . , ,, ...... [ a .C.
..eu.
...e==a ......a....... .. ,,
~
u.
.,1,,,,,,,, ... . ,_ _._ _.,l -
- i. -
,m, - . . g.. , --
i u,
........i garm . .-...
. . . . . . ..... I. _.... ,......
.~.- .
m e3 Q_
"" ~' m
. , 1 . . -- 'r-- cr.sr. _ x_ _ , _ .::, . ~~;
- s. r. . : 'D7mW 3":':::: y,o i .. . . . i~ ... d ...>
. ,., t~%:.....
] g J g \ '. 8 *-*-'* ; .. .. . ee,.
4
.,3 t.
....,. ;, . . -. {
. JC '
j ;{.
.u
. .... 64 a n ,g,,,,,,,,n.
.. km._, 3 . ...., -. n \ I,, ,,,,,,. ; ~. ...
, ..un... :
. . . . TL m, e.....'
av. l C t .i.a *. 4 Ge., .a . . ...i.[ .ba3 , .. ' . W gfra' , Jl. . . I . ...g.5.M5' i ~ ~ 7f' '- - "*
, _ . - q.,.. . U.*. c n ..*^*"* .h..~ \
.4 . .y f "** '
* ""' ~.- ..
. . . . te . -.,u.' WYO!!D. CO
. . . . . .. g 85 ' -' i ,,tt ogo,,4.%:' . - . .
gg u.... c 17'"7""01 3
-9 ' "- n ~. . . . .
x 2-a"-. " I i
. a .
. . , ~ . .. --
~~w R ! .. .
s O E _-- W 32km's. .
..TLani MR.. - .-
.......,,,,,,,L
..g"IA S64...' a-.
~~ - ' ,q p. . - - ..~~
n , F 0 o., ..
"' 6 F8F i
~.. i.. . . . ..'l..,.e2 0 6,~~i .~ , ... 1 . ....
v ..... .1.4 r/ ;A...ra.. 9't 57" " M' N 2452.... ;t: nH~
.. . N se :.. .16tn ...... ""
'""1 !i * ,,.....,3 s
Ch -6(p . 64 L , ; gg- t ., j- -
-...f. .. .
t c,e
-o.
, cc, 8924 -/36'53r -W-t -- 4 W " . -
@we . - . -
- t. ..-
1 1784 ""5628 ,. ., ...WO7 c < .~3D3Y . E
; . ,... . ....ma....)... ;
. . .-. .....T t h, i~- -
...c w.
. _. _ . , m3 g ,.
~1 i I
,.. -~..,u.. '..<..L___.' s. .
l l l,,.,,,,,,
.a...
e- ~ .. M6 '
- e. . . . " " . . " . ~ . .1g.~ g.g. a E
..-., ,e,,,,,,,,,
........... , . . , , , . . 290 -...'......
. . . . . . yy' ' / .k.4.7,5.. . . n , """";. .......~,..$ >
a
'i' f _
e3 .' ra'-
.3@
s...
- 1, , . . . , .....
...f.e.... --
.. . . ,3 U..1. ;... 37.54..,. 33%. . ' ~..,/ ""ll... - ' . :.:. j .... ~
2 l s..
- g .. . . .. .
2V.N"fl- . an - : 29 0'"
..- - ....... - c 4-..}.... ,
""~
pp.......,,,.,.,,..,,,.....4 p.;,. . ._.gL
;-. a
- .a
' . . . . +......p.
5 s-* a LLOB2m afE.4,. ., 56 i a _- "' g ,,, "'" " C* e "t
~
_i uc... .. w. l .. 1":%, ~~ ,, o r ~ . ' . - .
-4
- f.
I . ... !.- i .e r i 30 t# LE.. ......a'.. c.q ,, ..; -D.. .. 9g .>..g~g iIi ". - 1 _ , i...... a 3.u l :.':lNE6 2, , g. o. yt, g __. t ._ _.
.zs4 p , -n. - . pENNsYLVA'
- e. ; n.
,,._c 4,,
g
,o d , y.N !.c
- 1. , - j !-
~ - - '
_ l i ._
. _-_- )i ,
m
~', . .
..c.*-==-..-,_.i.F-.
= ._ -
I, .. u . i 1 i
~ ( I t ~~ --- ' I i
- t.68 7 p M
..l
,_ 3 -- ~ - . -
P.__. - l._=,.\. y - {' - .}-- I ._ r , g g_ g. j u., l
,,s ,)' ;-s
%o \ --- s i
_. _ l ,,.,
,s __ T I - -
I i i
1 N < 16KM T A g o 4550 i g 4,, , 172 574 853 1069 g 441 2429 u.... i E 418 1639 w
, .. 3...
A m 1564 o r.. 521
, , . ' * * " ' * * *. -' rwAbE. CO.-
s ...
, ,,. .c .,,,. .,' O "u.....nk'>"" -q 320 753
..~'...... 485 y, ,
.......r.
- . .. . . . l .. . , . ./ Io..!.r..... .
~....%..a , n-
*** 4 ,NohDA' , - .
, Cp 546 g
... ' u :. i
.e-1.f .. ...... , = l ... ! 20 m s
~.... IU.4......_ j. , ( - ;:
a m , . _. . . . . . i i 1 s
. . . . . . . - i ..... ,,,,, .., . ., .. ..
, . . . . . ... . o :..., . .,. , ,l . .. r.. . H ~.,... .~. . . . 3..... . . . , ., . . . . , . . ,..........,,:= , . . . . oi f,;,, ........pr ,o .. ,y .. .... t.. _ .. s
- C*.f,I
- Q.*ni .s. .w.s. C*
,. n at, m.
l o-. '%. u m a cu m, f. ... ...... sr.seca co. - -@t i .x' .. ..%. . i . ,a.. .. 3, m ......a o ~ n.- ,c, , , , , ,, .. ... . . . . . . . . . . . , . . , . . .... .. . . . ..,,,.,,,i,,,,.;
' s *'".' u .. . . . .. F. O J O r .. . . . . u ..au. ,,,_
,,: . . . . ~ . . . . . . . .
- g . e: ;r ,,c"> i .c- ~.~.
i
.... I ... i ......
-:a w; u~ e ..... ._g ; '. "a 2000 POPULATION
.._ , x. r .n-
.... .t. . . . . .
1 ._ . ~..! ,
......,_yrM.... ..~~,.....=;gl__
PROJECTIONS BY SECTOR I u.u. . I...........
,,, e l ....
g
... j! .
t
-a. WITHIN 16-80 KILOMETERS l v* : ......n' l. ....o -
- u. .
. , - - - --t ......' T- ; (10-50 MILES) 0F THE SITE
.r. .., ,AArts co.- io- ,..r .
- ,a ... ~..
3......
- r
. J.iIl s , ,......
~..
..... 4 _ \ l .. . , ,
o 1,0 0, 10 20
. s .
...u . I ra.$af 'E,, ;
.. s . , , , . .
g-
.. -s-.u s t .no ,n.ua.j .o l 6 - ,, .i. . g 3 a..o... l .......
i -- N ,....roum% ,co, _$1,6 0 3.,
'"",(,yms 4o. - --
b... : "'* 1p 7
- 1. u ., , . .~. . ; " . " *.,-a . [ ;, I wo.....D
.;i : -
.y y p . . . . . . . .s. r.
c .... . . .j ,, , , , , g,, , i . j 'a K I L OP'+e E P 5 I, f
,.r .
/ .
I
&I ,,,,,
"'"" 9!.;".. . . . . . . *.
" A.. -_f .-47 z. ' r ~~--
..ua. r P> ,
- m. a swoots
. .: =aJL .
l. n . . .i. . .,. . . . ; x. ""- ., <p...... I -**'a p.i !
...n .3,, ps a 's. .,,.u.'. 4.'.l. * " *
- I. . ,
. . . . . w a ' ' " * * * ' ~ -.- CouNiv ~1, ;
d*2 I .. ......I h i. m. umon Civit civisiCN u.,xui ( .u
-a'"* !oj d ....a w ! na. ... F.u.
1 C' }. D
....,g - ***l aa- ' - .........--
iNCoapcaarto oa uNaCoa'oaatto iga . II'o " "% ptact .,o1. umca Civit o.visio=
- s. . . n
,,, ..,,~4 " 7 .. o INConPCRa?Eo On UN*ConaOaATED PLACE
* * -* :.n jo ... ......
i ! J - ... I
. " l ,,,8 ,,,,a ... , w o .es.~1, r' l...... l t. ... n.. ,I
.= 71 I
=
P... t I...... 4... , pm ,y,. : ,
. . .' . l.41 g .,..C. .
at . ..o .- ,,,,, . ,,, ,,pa. ~o Pa*.;jt , : 7.,,,. , , ,~.,.g,. r TYPE STYLES
. ...f.. O s... . c .f .*f,"' *****"M f ,. n ASHINGTos CouNTv
. .,,o I ,,
4 wasa NGrom M Noa Civit o. vision
- u. .. . . l, YORK
. . . . .f* **'. .. . ,.y ,w arhiristan .,,C,,,,,,,,o,,.a.,,..
...4 . . . . . . r p .. .. ,-
I ..
; e
' ~
Osr MORE I4-ABif Anis eiA --~ ' ' ' . -' ~- ~' - i
~'"l .,,, , I ~ li -~:"f 1 - w.a.oin. mCoaaoaatto atact an* Hata y
u't i ! L', --p ,. m w ooo .. sit wrs 9 .
$a=
- k,
- M. , ' ! ....#. UNmConPOnaI(o PtACt
__- i -
--; _ 2 . ;
i
- .s i
=I.&/. 8507030441 -
- '-- ~
i - i- ,'s -l g ' i
. i i
.__J .
O , __ bi
,/ MAP
,_. j ,
\ )
G ' ' . #_ _ - -~ -' 2::: i d l-
REFERENCE:
I
. I l e i - -
U.S. BUREAU OF THE CENSUS, 1970. l { FIGURE A.3.1-1I
PERSONS PER SQUARE MlLE 500 400 300 YEAR 2000
/
l / YEAR 1980 100 Y
-f I i 1 01 2 34 5 to 15 20 25 30 RADIUS (MILES) FROM SITE l
9 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 48 KILOMETERS (30 MILES) OF SITE O FIGURE A.3.1-12 l
o l ty - ,
*- v n
= 15tl c' CLI gh 3 o e = 8 KILOMETERS l
\ ** f l
, P g a ag '
;f'b K Q 2:&;A a
%g Ft AP g 4 84 g ,
~ .
.c -
,N "
~ , .
34_ y - . =" 4 n k k 8 "I [ I
,, , e, 89 tt pc
. ._. 7 ,_ , , . ,, ,
y ,, sn ,. - - .
-)
- ~ ~
~ '-
.g
~ . ,. .
a ..
.. s f, r. ,, L
. - a . - . s. .
a. r. 1 {r. ,, i
~
F. f M 6
" " f. g 't g
'~
~ ~ -
-+ ,, ., v -
- r. {
a
* " M ,, y r. **
,,'k ,,
t\' , , t y- ,. t -
.. Q .. .
a a
, ,a r. ,
G3, * '
r. y c. o u ,, q
-2; ~ ,. ,.9 .
. ~
] r. ,. ,. ..
TSITE y g x g ~
.; .,y -
g' ; b r. e.
*~
,, [* ,,
%,, " ,,, .. =.
.. c ,.
,. y RJ .,
^! r. '-
- y , r.
*l ,
a, ,. a s. '- '-
,. a. ,
4
.. a, '. '-
- p,, " 7 . r4 , ,,
{ 1 g- ]e~s i - ar. ..
$' ... f :
,. g . ..
q ,.. .. - <- f- <
REFERENCE:
~ . .: ')~~ .
- e. . , ,
ORNELL UNIVERSITY, NEW YORK STATE LAND USE AND '. - k NATURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY, 1969; AND CATTARAUGUS COUNTY PLANNING BOARD, EXISTING LAND USE MAP, 1977.
,. a.
* @ co * (*
- f
] 't ACTIVE / ,
6 I Ao 0ACHARD l Av VINEVAAD
) >
Ah HORTICULTURE At HIGH INTEN517Y
- 9 L
[ Ac CROPLAND / CROPLAND PASTURE [ Ae PERMANENT PA$TURE INACTIVE V4 Al AGR6 CULTURE IRACTIVE as. a. s. F. 4 %g - FORE STLMO Fc SRusH COVER UP TO FULLY STOCRED r* 9 '
- 8. POLES LES$ THAN 30 FEET
*a
'" i I "
s Fn FOREST OVER 30 FEET n re ,
. A
- 3 m 4 ' t. Fp PLANTATIONS. MY SIZE a
W[ s
.. =
WATER wn NATURAL, MY $1ZE
** h h a, ,
We ARTIFICIAL ONE ACRE
- r. " Ws STREAMS, RIVER $- 100 FEET
-i cp ,,
* " h
'8 .. ., .. PUBLIC
~'
% ALL CATt:0 RIES
P
~ ,.
m RES I DENTI AL
' w k **
a.
"' ' } ,,
Rre M131un OEMSITY. 50-300 FEET FRONTAGE R1 LOW DENSITY, OVER 100 FEET FRCNTAGE er .*
,. ,' . ,L, fr As STRIP VITH MAX OF 1/3 INTERMlITURE O
8' H
/
g, OF Cs ComERCI AL
,, *
- i COM,*E RC I AL A
^* 8e ..
0g , ' * * *' n ,
** Cu UR8M (DOWNT0h84)
,, p Fa a n. Cc SHOPPING CENTER g, ,. "* Cs COMMERCIAL STRIP VITH MAX OF 1/3 INTER-
& MIXTURE OF Rs OR DENSITY HOUSING
" ' s.
w . c3
**
- I
*s h
/ -
Incusig:At or se p ,,
k ** . Il LI GHT =MUFACTURING
,1 Ih MEAVY MANUFACTURING
[ 3 ,, , g4g ,, j
- a. ,,
s. 7< ,, h at ,,
,, k
- E rTR ACi t VE Eg GRAVEL. SAND
,. ) y
,, ,,
- e. Es STCNE OUARRIE$
j j e. Me On h V OUT000R *EC4EATION r .. C_ ,, ... m,, u perinre card r.
=, ,.
,, ) n \ . .
e
~
g dP q w c g .. "~ e .. q TI n w %, ' -
- c. - ..,-
M ., '
- - q., a -
APERTURE 3,.__-q- .. .. p, ,,
.. t
- CARD
- - a ..
y . y .. g j 2000 0 2000 4000 6000 FEET
, g. h
' ' ' ' ?
.5 o K" i
~ g,,, *[; "
g , ; .. y . ,, ,,
%. ..t / ~ i- ~ . ..
~ ,,
; 3 8 5 07 03 04 41 - $
(
'* i ,, "
g"hr,- g ,, SITE VICINITY O- LAND USE
~
- v m .
e
,, ~
+ 'n -
I,, m 5b *. '
.f NORTHERN PORTION E*
- . s l .: .,
~
5,.'.', i
* " b bi- 5 " l FIGURE A 3.I-13 f
(
y if-I D
;y -
s a *
.e ! 4.
g .- n ,. . . ( g - 9 .. ,, ,, N ,,
~
.. r. ,," r. A
, 7 n r j
- r.
- s. ,, ,
k r. a L
, 9 e, f ,
~
n ,.
b l
[~ ,, ,.
~. j a ..
q ,.
- a, iV
. v- .,
a,
.. p .. c.
" \ ~
4
%r.
~ "
r,
~ '
* '% = .. . , , ,
~
' m-
'- /)., e
,j,~_,d '-
c ~;c. , w ., . ~
] r. s. ,\ j. ,~ , .
J SITE m @
<- c. / .. c. ,, ..
r.
- 1
. . s ,,,
' ~
'* a. a.
- r. e. ,,
( ~ -
~ G. '- " ,, R
* ' ~ '- '-
,. ,, J %,
~
,. r .. '.. k ' ~ 9 7E - c., ,. ,.
M i - _./ , , - rs 1 =* . k ,, f- i + ,. ( L. , ,,3
* ,, ,, =
b6 * ., '4 ,5 4. 9
~
~. -
3 .
~-
'- ~
\ ,
~
~
~ ~
~ . ., ,. ,.
97- ,
'..,.},; k
'~ '
.,'~ ,.
~
[ _. N' ~ ,,
. ': h ?k ? ' Q f f ,,
k. yx
~ ,.
7
, pi, m " .
~
Q
'. a, ,,
REFERENCE:
= r, CORNELL UNIVERSITY, NEW YORK STATE LAND USE AND 4 ,,
( NATURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY, 1969; AND CATTARAUGUS ,,
~6
- COUNTY PLANNING BOARD, EXISTING CAND USE MAP, 1977. Mi !
- F 8 KILOMETERS
( l l
A ACTIVE [
'"' ** ,, Ao ORCHARD As ,,
5 ** . p. e As VINEYARD er ,, ,, ,,
= Ah HORTICULTURE l ,
,, s ,, e
- s. > ! At HIGH INTENSI M r,, s. a "
A6 ,
*- ,'F AC CROPLAND /CRCPLAND PASTURE Ap PERMANENT PASTURE
" = s. \
n, ,. ae - h ,e INACTIVE e \ a. f As AGAICULTURE INACTIVE o k 7s , q er de ,. , J ** s.
" FORESTLAND ne * . . as ... a Fe 8Rusn COVER UP To FULLY STOCKED
- r. 8' O 4t PCLES LESS THAN 30 FEET d' a.
Fn FOREST QVER 30 FEET
- Fp PLANTATIONS, ANY SIZE j~
,, WATER
" .* s. a p, F*
- r. .
se
- s. " hwt NATURAL. ANY SIZE
* ** ** .. i n
a We ARTIFICIAL. ONE ACRE h s. (*
- Ws STREAMS. AlVER5- 100 FEET
(
- s. ,,
', 7 ~ v
,.t'~ .. ,.
,. ,,1 ,y, tic
,, " P ALL CATEGORIES s
N h A.
"N' h y RE510EsTIAL Rm ME3 6um QEN58TY. 50-100 FEET FRCNTAGE
,,M s.
8 ,,
** (g Al LOW DEN $ TTY OVER 100 FEET FRONTAGE 3
A ku p v Rs STRIP WITH MAX OF 1/3 INTERMIXTURE W L r u El , OF Cs COMMERCIAL
** a
COMMERCIAL 6 % 8',, ,, Cu uRBAM (DCbMTOVN) D 'M' A' 8 u - . e. Cc SHOPPING CENTER N,, Cs COMMERCIAL STRIP WITH MAX OF 1/3 INTER-(* - --- m
" A* "
[* ..
L 4
= ,,
MIXTURE OF Rs OR DEN 58TV MOUSING
#2 ~~~
~ T. .,
1 y ,, - . [I
* , l ,% 9D ' a, ,,a,,q m urACT;RisG F -
u Nu o m e,A m R,No
.. - g .. ,/= %
v
,, ~ ..
- J -1 -
EnucTivt
~
aa w.. $Asc g,r .. ,, ,, {> Q. 7 Ei E. $ Tat :u:RRiES d b. g able On
' ' T~ ,. .. .
~
L,~, auto::= >EnnTe . gAperture Card
,, i O-F - - , .
,, 2 -
u -.. aa nw 7 .- ,,
- ~
7 Lj
~
- 5- APER URE
,- a-CARD
- r .. f ,-
l .. Mg
~ -
,'; ',; ~~
f ; ..
~ - ~
+ .. . m* g 2000 0 20,00 40,00 6000 FEET I3 =
,, h .. ..
.G.h 4 ,G t ,
i xn _) , .
- i
_' i' 3 0 g ..
; <' ,?
W} _ t..
.. lcc"~D '
} ., " ,, .."' ,,
.4 .< '
8507030441 - % d" "J - . 1 ',', .. s SITE VICINITY
,,'"(, y LAND USE k .. - J -
x sa i u ", .. .cb >
; SOUTHERN PORTION
'? ,,
C .. - d.-c
)
E l .. 4
~ . . .. .%4 -- n l FIGURE A.3.1-14 l l.
e M
l
' ~~,N' i 6 v. '
pq,,,Q(
~
- y ~Q" c
" /
O %f e H/ \; Ai~~ s, x
- 3 ,r ,
b twwo
*j M s 16 4
^
f ,
) Q .
R 'H C OLL' Nb I III
/ !_ E *"** \I rw
+4
/
. S 4 a o, p \q h (59 e,n,, ~
^-
l 4 @ ['EG-D#*?.I m V S,*%
> ms.* >
OL LIN S
\
I i, c Y s
.s is so e v0AKS" %
m
,,, f-'
cAE i,,
"*** d 4 so M is vy a
.y [ h , is Y. '
# se 18, e s .
l , ,
, u ,e,,,, .-
E A S 7, T **
- te se o saa SIA as 3 ,,
- 3. ,a y 0iT / ,,, c n, m N ] ,,
se yA- iAS @ ono
~~ > y/
~ ,< .
'y r .
~ -
3 g} (L - NEW c ,iCOT' - '~ " BIC h @ M A N S F I E .O gf is _ sa N(L.NV E N s Q ( tscon*** y
~'
i - ,w P, ,,
, ,! ,. . s < <
I i iw , 5 1 5
"!LES
& Q 9 1 3 <ttartitas Wm, m _ 4_. _
hum 8ER OF DAIHf COWS BY SECTOR WITHIN 16 KILOMETERS (10 MILES) 0F SITE l O flGURE A.3.1 - 15
j f A g EAlw Mglable W O y
& Aperture Card D
N 1 ggTM cpD CANADA U.S. l w..... y "-"".. L s1OR.L..E.A.NS .. ._ _ _:._!? "1," *." . _ _
' CO' u.so. , . . .a e MONkog CO-t pp i
- u. O.... j l ..ac. .; .
....n ,.
- w. e a " . >. ,o....O ,, ....u.,.
~, ...,8
,.__..i
- p. . .; a = ~ .. -"...fcg;s+ "**"*" ,...
i p u.... I _ _ . B b_. kht $s.4di. - _. , _la m ... g ..c_t a .l*"' [---- - m,,
} -
L.......I ,
. ,y;,.
C ...-..".....M.,...., u .- ...n u... c,
. . v__ _
t o.,
, . . , n ,, * " a u""
'- r- - 14 0 53_, , ,,,... . j
. q. . .. m.
_%.A-5 a a.. . u ..o ser Fans-'M *. ',*.' :j u'a g otNE.u.E cu - j .. . , _ ay ,,, .g., g g g g. ,*l@ ' r 5 - 7 4v ; . l"""*"' l;" \ -- a 7......u
.. ...a. '. o... . . . " .. e . ,, . a i "" "
.. <~...
.--e tt 2 3 .,
O . _x r .~.. m n
,. /
g ..n . o. .; _5.m ( t . ..
... 3.J " . = ~ o.'= o.,.
(..,,.. .. -.il. .. '
! /_ __.. . =
" "
- N,',t;'. p, ..........
.-< 1 n..,,. ! .. o.o"--
0 0 w d;aaM"' * *"5' ,3. .01~ ~ ..'*"~ ~'~'54)4> ("'"-*
.:r .
C' y /
.x,"..~_,
...l.... ,
c ... I E l ""
"Iy @4". "~ . . s'. , , . . _ . , . .
c.. . . .I...- 3 0
.c .G
.. . -n4"-. .488
..*Cs . 3 7
. . .~e u ..
."o I . . ..a. ,
- 'e-~.......
c y . . ,. s.
-- .+. _ . . . .
--z";" .
e y, f m.... n. i O R g
, ,,..,...<. n
...s I :
i:; i.,,;... - L_ - -
. 'I -nI5'9 0 " "' ' '
8 .9F', . . ,"? ~. 7 "5 "2438 +- 6
- - + - -
. * * " . - ' ' ,'8 0 7"9' *. , . ' t y, .--.'
(~' 0 "' '" o.. u i y '
'"t .~.'a" ,;. . ,, ,
M9 * \* . ..
> f 7.r. -- 9 9 7 --
-. . -. .2531 ,,
g -....... 9; 8 8 ,," .,,..,...'.'c... p
.... u. <o.. ... ,. s ..o u .. a 6205 ... i,.: .- /. _.. (.3 ..
,,,,c .
I -- i,.... e...- - , um . p
- i '
.sw ...
- e. . . . -
- vrM -t1 --L, . .
= ..
W 534
..._., r
'fi(327.. ..... . . - .
_-i4sM .M,M~T ,,,o. 2_771_. .
,, 7 " " .2_s42 "'31 a 7 , '!.31'81 -
E
/ ..<...... ....u,-.. ~
.u
~,._ .
_. _.42] . ...
/ . 7, 7 .
...o...... ! . ., .e-
-[ t".',3g 6 2 -
.m.,,
""~
/ ,,, . . . "
o .".*-..,. .' _14 4 _- .y........~
/ * ....... #
, u. 4 u 1
..oc..o.
^". " e j , b-/>,'
. . . . . . 3 4 2 5 e. . . .,. 176
. . . . . T' a
-.g.1d ' * ~ 42"' . . ,
"'*I^'**" "* 'E i
r 33230' * ~~ ~ ~~ ~ '
- 4. s
' ' .%. u . ' ' - - w 13;ti.~ b
,; <.o. 4* @ J., Goo? , "'
*" .m.. N...T... ,e 213
,,.1..'.~..*
..u. , 11K8,
,y, ..-o
~ " " o,... .- .
- Tr
.. , - .. ...c . ., ;;, . ....
l '
'4401.. i.
'. A. . . .'. .
q l
~~
j - ..
".e 7 ..34 6 . . . *. .-. .
. ...... . . . . . . . . , , . . . .v.,,,,,,,.
,,,,,. .., e. .
.o ,.
.c g . :.m. *
-1206c a s.v...
- - - - - + - -
__~ 2330-
"s
{- _ z v- *- i....--. -,...'..
.m. ., , _-
e
- .,y "" q., ... pu -
- _ 103 u.,
..a , ,, ,4., ' ) "90062 .o o,.. ..
v, ,,,;,,, , _ i -
,,;,-l.-
, m-. ,'.". ,. ., . ' . e,191.
. ;> , " _~ . 4 ~
. ,..:s e. e.. .
__375 . , --_- 4 g
..~.(~ .!
=. .u....,,,
s ,,.,,. e s . . ., u.au
,
- s I , ,
P.
.o... ,
. , . . . i 3.; ..
~
- l " ," - ' - j (_ a . ' f = u .a '* ...-
4 . ' 8. ' N El. g 1 j
- -. - 443 5.-- _ fras w p
246 ""* ft l i t'*, rr- -+- g ... I,
)t .
i L. ,,, 12
.-'_ - L4 93 l-
~R 3 , , .-
7 .
\, [ , I !
l . - ,
*===. f . -. * * . -" . ' ._
.- - , ! ,w
- -----.. . f ---- g' .. f ..t t 8 e;
, W / .'0
. ;; - - ~ ~ , - ._._./ .
i
. t n 7 t
--. ~
q , 1 HE.,y ,
; }
, -._.-.i
,,, .i.- ..
- l l __ m. --
' - 273 -- ~ ~ - -
,". 9 3.s,on - j-1 , . , l '
t- l
- - ta
--- i f
.& l, -
-s s
i t _ ag i _a . l i - - i 5
16KM I A R I O % 696 541 k 45 926 Graailable On
adurd Car 3 398 2022
,m 4....i
.- .W 411 1328 E
.:t TI ""t s
.ERTsRE .-
g._ .k 1 .,, ., 540 i4ti CABDRD o ..~, ' t .$"- 491 721
.s..,. d. pN' C" '* e . ..u."
............r d
535 302 S o !
'-...t
, .. c . n, .. .N
- - ~ ~
.. . . ..i , $ 534
/e/ ;, , .. .~~.. .. . .: . e . ...A. .;a/ . .. . ,
. . ~ . i, . . . . y 2 . o . . _ _ .
~
.s .** (Oh0hDA a
"t .---4 _. .
,,,,, , I,4
, . '"*** 10 MILES Roch.etN 3 e
.,,.u
,...e..,,..,,[ ,
j
,-. m
. Mn m.--
U.N.. f ~1
- T . .a .i. ..e . , - t - - - - *
. .- A.- - #"*"g j "'o.s ~ . .'. . .! O , , ./,,,, l ..u ' ** -" *
- u*. o .' ,r,i...I"*.".*(*-**'","** g
>"aa'.
....,,. C';; ..... .. ....J....'."-"':*.*~
- -.A.
- . t a -. * .....".s
. aaa
(....v.....-
**g,...t...,,.. o. .
4.~..... . _ . . g'".*.. . fOhTAhlo Co.
.. ..- - suaca co. 4. . .... ~..., -, .. . . L' ,* w - -- ..........,i .<o. .- l~r;. ,;. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , , , ....
/ i "" i . . .u. . . . ipj o,...... . . . . . . . .
,K.~. . .-. .y~ . ,... y - " , ll . ......;
... .a.....- ...........
; . . . . - i /
.. . ,. v . ... . . .. . . . . ><
- i. . ..a.
... p m ._ r t.. g.. ",-.ej m.. i r .r '-a..- . ,, .... <
r- NUMBER OF DAIRY COWS BY SECTOR
.... .t J.r 1 3 .......
Is ,"' i'"*"--- "m.* ' [ - x% i .. .. o "
, ,,, s J I
..... l :g / ... ;' - . _ , - . ,,
,,,a . WITHIN 16-80 KILOMETERS
__ M j [I Am / _coy.a",od j .. o
"+
.; (10-50 MILES) 0F THE SITE c
..i ; .
....s
... i. =o .. .
t...... , , ' , , u .. .. 10 0 10 20
\ ;
~~a i,......
c o... r - + ' ' ' '
'"- ( 7 ...o _ _f, , ."~_1 ,,_ / - . - _ . -
. s . . . s .. . . MILES
-a..I o I .,%. . . . . . . "fs,q . .m -
. , _ , , _ l '""a l .. m _ l '"" .......... Tom hi ., n- ~ 16 0 16 32 L smeGm - - I w. '....-s .
",*",',*...e<...].~.....,,.. -] j "
t N " - * ~ po"* KIL0 METERS
""".."/. ' , , . . . . . . . . .
(. g, ,"a*au ';.-' -j , r . ..a a.J<
. n.a . . .
;. ue,., _ D; 3.t
-"'a- -
j m,. .:r. -",,.,
- "-^ , . ,_ .,n. - - s .;
..,o u .. ....... ) j g ~~' , i . .. u .
*'*a s w Hots
....e.,
.-4 y i g....... 1, ...
. . . . - - a= = ,__f' ..... L. M _ . __ ="* -% . . . . _ _ ,
""".*% - . - - toum t,
, .- e . -
w e o..i av~o~ p .... ! ~ : i 7.... m . ...... ....-. h lt " - i ..* na s . .,
,m l ; ."" , *d "
i = ... O m,,,, . t.
,,,c e.y.,i n g, gy,,comy) . ri o n A e NOf A AMON Ovil DtwSON j4 .
n .m m. m * ~j u.wu ,
,, a r..;.&+ - - .*.cou-onit0 08 owconeAito n Ac t s.....O 1 _ .- +. - -- l' ro u
-(. . " '"- ', * ' ,'.' ,", ,',,N . ". I , ,l . aieH n aia isa~ i sno 4. ** t a~n
_ _ J,, I. ... ,......., ,.... i ,, 1 r J *; , e.j4.W e _.t..... n..1+-~s,......' _. ,
- r^
5a* " * . . . . o ... L- l.f.,,...,,,,,,;~** M =".,s -
. y., , . .",7 ,,'!,"" , .. " t - ~ - ~
MMSMds b j >
- .* a L %,i .. . s.c . i . i. ,.,; ,4 ,,.. (, *...u.c. .1 n . : : e ".*. ..
[L -- ---J [g.. A.u ..A. g___ ,. r n..., g, ,,, j....., 4 W V. TON COUNtv
! c ...
- NO" C ' " *5'0" i *
- s "' * * ' " **
""*a'** .
u l ';".; o..u , u ,' b'*?'"J l [ YORK I 9"**t.*.'.". ("'--'[....,, ,, j w ,nu,g,,,n .=couvatt o m act witH '>o oro
*a- -
- NIA " _ " " " '"' ,' ~- - @."~-.- '
~
(
,1
- .i*-'-- . n ". t. m . d .. h .ng t. + INOW5TINAff D Pt M I 4'lH II WI8
.m. '"" I THAN .50 (810 INHABIT ANf 5
[ , f
=~ ,,,
c . ~ , _...,... u~-. ,, o , x. [ 8507030441-Io
._ l l __
-? l.-i_ -l -.
l
- 1 l
.j e
- j. - r
';:,,A..
/ --. *--S~wg-s MAP FIGURE A 31-16 h
J f' l G ---' #' # ' " "
REFERENCE:
U.S. BUREAU OF THE CENSUS, 1970. I
)
g$,sg;( . ' -,x j NIe ' }*1 ip /
- 6. - 5 O i ; A7--
~
e eb, T ,,4 i N r N : ~... s1
/ e
/
~
. > c om .s , z w
.. 1 L
+/g, , - 1 Mis A R 0l rw ,
-e7j L
sse
- h, V %.
~( h b(.
(*1~ % ,, k e' - Tm ,, o 8 YO L( LI N S ' W ss de q'
'4 13 , 14 e 10AK5- % caf e ' 'w (
T e'
, , r. ... zL\i A
=f..L%
-t
- s. t ..
'dr a # pr , # sr r,
,8' 2
,s ,,
- 1. y ar g s.
s T is as af e EAST ' , , SiA 33, 3,
- 3
" **
- 5A M 0TT ,
f ,,,,g, a
/ va-ias s N ,, ,
___ \. ,
-\ -- - [ .- , .
one _y(
? W(
en ( , .
"g[e gb t,iCOff
M A N S F l E .0 3g 7 , sn =4 s t N v .t
- ! til.ccM 5
' s / r m m.. of, \ ' , ,, , ,i iy , _? yMILES 3 <ttertites
?_ _ _ _ ?
!!Um8ER OF MEAT-PRODUCmG AmmALS BY SECTDH WITHIN f 6 KILONETERS (10 MILES) 0F SITE O
FIGURE A 3 i-17
t 1
./
{ g A g b.o Asdiable On o N Aperture Card
- I T1 :
APERTSE l U.S. CARD [ CANADA 4g
% J co.
, p, . .. . . .l.. .w. . .. ... . . .. , . . -. . ..
. ..... m - ; ' f JRLEAh8";.....;:-
"<$m -
h / a
.1 .........--- ...>
g,,,, r -80 hart' d* -'L ._1 e ._.u.- W. 7 I . . . . .. - _ /I' "2.r
. "-, 4 ., ,...
6.......I ..
. . . . . .i
,,t......,
o...
---- e .- ..... ,.,,",,",,an...H .s...,..
a.." ..
...... - - 19 52 , ..*,a* **
. ,,,., r. ,. y --..,n..a.
GL.'%LL ' c
- -s -
1-- - . w"
- u'!- .**'". ~3 t t.~-
,64'k75%/' ' - ,
2 4, * ,,.. .. ...a .U 83..
*"g..,,., ..
.'.u..J..
w .. . .. -
- p ..
. . . . o [ .q . . . . . . .,
.--"t 2 6 2 . ...m'"-.~" .j - '~a
/_. . . ,, . ' ,
O v;..3 . . . : . .. 4 - 1 i 4 0 4 2 "' , *- . .
.s. . . , . :
- e. .....as sum.
..., 4,9F.k..
m .. . . . . . . o. . i
- o. -
g045oi,a no . , \. ' . ~ ' \ ..,........,"-'n.
., e..... . .. ...u.. t -
t s.... l I
.f v p, .
f %a _,,.% o %(~-- p
;;.1120
~
......us
,,,y-=.=
t........, .. -%.., M W.O_ .,-
? . _ , ,
~.s
.t 0 .. 75 8 ' . * -.,,o .. -. '* 3 7 8....... .....,,.
p /
/ um, ~ *y ,,,.-
~
-'.... 4.i,'.,..'.#... . . - . '
4.. 0 . . . . . R 1 100 2.-[-.- _ _,n.
~* " "
~.
"'"" 4 I O '"
'" e ,-
.$736 -. ...... --
9 9 3 8 .' '*, u... 6 0 *. --> ' ' ""'~ * -
.+ -4
, ' 2 4 53 . 2487 ,,8 ' '
g e , us , .. ,.. .- 00'ON./
,. ./
- b E *
*2118
)
'T.'.",,,,
'" 'e " " '
1 Q90 *. . 2E 37 y 5873 ,, '"""
..../ ..,., . . . ...
. ; s. .
M. 4, , ...o . , , 253S. .. . .
.....g,,.,
* " 't wa.v w_ a.
j
,,,-..... SIT .-
3225" A.s234y [#8?. 7y,nQ~;
; ,_ .. n ,,7, . - ,3 0 s , 7, , ,, .g
, . . 1 _ _ _ . _ _ -
. . . /. ! , ....
. It.5 8 6
' ~ '
14 Si I . _ . . . . . ..... . . . .~
' . -c-c f
' 4 EII, " ' g
.a<e..
--.4 ."a
- E
3740
.,,. gg yo, M4 4, . '"'
",- *',,m., _(
~
m....- ' ..'*i ,'a-....e 2 6. . .l .-- . --""' i."". . . . . . **
; ***"- +
r
'" : 4309 . . . . ....
****' 12.7.2. . ' ' m.. . -
t
} '
' i.* '4 4 % ,1, E
.. o 1146 3' 7
. . .. .S. . . . . ' . 1287o... '.'u'.. ***
.--. a . . .
< . ..... . . . . . . '. . .- .p.. ' . - . . t
...m.. , , . , . . .
~ .- , 2587" , -
.o" I . .
r ...... I .. + v ,, . a .u ..
'. 9 9 5., , , . . , e .. .+.. i '
. 8357 h e -* *'"**""
.8054 . ' ., .: . . .
,", ;,- n....
. , ;, ,a
. .. .... 1 \ ;.;,,,,;; ."
, . ' ;, 2 e ( . .....'
l 22a4-~ .
,( .f .
l - _
- r. k"*
, , , , , ,, , , p , : . .,
l " a- .
. . . . . I NR
. . . ' t.1'5.,0..3 ._,T
- 3 ..rv., u,
,,.- J 57 d, 1 2+ **
- I I \ - r\ g\ .
_""_M 19 r .. +
- t ,, _PENN_SYLVA>
%. f' .. ' . . g y )i .
_ ] / f I /* ' I g [ y
=.'l._..
I
. 4 . ,, ,..,_ .,g... , - -
.~. > I ] f ' ,_
h 1180 .
- . . . . ,N 59 0 S.u ..
j e (
)......
. . .; , g s .l f _ 1 1
-70s ' ~ ~
..., i e --
s
. - l
. - ~
r i 3 Q- - ;
; .l }l { t '
l
. x.., . x ... , I
\ ,,
e.~ l. H -~ (.a ., A. l
.m , i --. ; ; ,,_. 1i S
I.t
p N 16KM T g y , 9 yS4i 696 541 h 445 926 398 2022
. . W 411 f e"(( .
s E 1,,.... .. 540 1411 s, , ..,, . p. --'.
.w.s,............e 4; ;
....,~~m#
c..v .
. . . . . . . a
'A m co
.S
.~....t j/ ..... ..,.......N,,-.....
,:p 535 534 302 t....... .: . -
. m/-..._. . . .
.. .s s o, sow 4 y I uch tet , , .. a . . .
0 r.
].
,,.*,Q, .
jp p.c. t.. 1 . .
- e,. .a .h... ., . .
..... ,..,s . ..a . S
. . . . . . . ,,y,,,, .... ~..~ .~. . ~ . ......
... ,~~". .
~, , ,, ., ,,~ ~ . ,.,. l n.,..
- :::: ..omiao -a-. . .. u, ,,,, , .-, ..
, z , : ':'.* "' ',; ~
w . . . ,..~e...-.. ,. ... - .~. m.,,,,,,,..
. saw u> ; e. . . - ,
. , . c::: w w. .,.a 3 . a......
. ~ :.: . .. ...w .. x . .:. " ' " ,':.' .". .
I t...
.p............... . . . - o...- ~ ~ . -
r="
.. IJ ..'f h.; :r - .
g""7,..d,1,,,,,,,,,t,a
;i: NUMBER OF MEAT-PRODUCING
,,,,, s .- . m-m j
.. . m i y
.....,i._-
.r-1....s,.....
f 1-s . . . . ANIMALS BY SECTOR j! ,i .~~.
.J1
......o,' .. 4.
WITH8N 16-80 KILONETERS
~. - . ; '
. \^16 s co i ,
(10-50 MILES) 0F THE SITE
,,, ,i : g L.m...n . , . ... . . .
. ~ . . .. i.. m ....,, .o".. :,....e. .-..,,,.. . . . .
t, t.......
-r' J 7 -
10 0
'~*,.r,, 10
- - p. , .. . . .
.,, '.'.W s . . . , . . , ,
< > , 2,0
.~ ' m . I , s.... . . . , , , , , . . . , . . , , , _ . . ,_ g,tg
.~. ."- ,.,. . . . . nm uw ,o '
-j q m uto u u, t - .,,....' 16 0, 16
* ", ; . <., - .. ....... . ~;7,- . , ,
i "" - .. ~ 3 , 3,2
'.*"'$........, .g
{, 6 .."U {
;g KILONETERS
~ . y_
r . . . . . .. . . ' ,;; 7, .
..u"
. . . . . . -; 3 . ..
4 . . ao s t
,.......,.,j a:"a-. ...... i . .. . . e
). . . . ,
5 'YHon
. . . . - - . . " ... f .,..... i
$.1 . .m........ ., . _ _ _ . _ o ., ,,. i ,
~
vv+ o .."">' r-'..,..., . ' ~? ::: ..
. , . . r e * -" " , . -. o . '..,
." ." ?"' [ M r..... , , . W , , , , , ,, . e... ,,, omy . m , ,,, , ,,,,,, o .. . %
"......u,. a. e i en n a, , v i . . . < . . . i . . ' . %
-- . t - - nvre, w: .iu.... . -] o. .. ) y. ~1 ., . o r . . . , e . . , o *n w e n ., s. t
" me s...~..,..,........, ....e"-"."..".. .
. M.'. I , , . . , , ** i a o a s * '"a . > * >.-a N ' a e
- ~ ,,
i .. "... u.. N. ..
',n. ,,
.... >.s ,3 ..... .... , .... .......
=
u _ ,. . . . , . ,,,;. .. ~ , J 9 ~~,. , ..;"P.'"l-. . , - ', .. .
, , n .,, a s
; .n.1% '
. f. -._ , ....._....%..__3.....t.~..,...q............ 4 .. w ,m. .r. .. . o...i. j . . . .. v
. - i..' . . ., . , .:. .. M " ' ' " " * '
-. 4 ...e.
' - " - 8
. . .s.... . o. - ,0 YORK I I *.*:. I %. n.n i. n % om* + a r e n s, n e a,' wn.
I a"' r .. .. , - i1A - "' '" l W .. 4C ~ j .. .- =
. j." ,.-a.....
. <, .s....o e . , a i,. n a..
J .1
.-,3 ;
,l -
g ,-, x. ., ,s w s
---m
. ~
.. .. n ., - n .. .s .a
_. i, .
, j_ ~~~
i
,J ; - ,
.-~ _
,r !
- )., - FIGURE A 3 i-10 w
e
, ,_, ,) L*l'7 . '
M ==:r.- r.- MAP 4 I l, M.
'~'b - --' -- # '
REFERENCE:
f
' i ' '
U.S. BUREAU OF THE CENSUS. 1970.
\
8 5 0 7 0 3 0 4~.41 -] t
TAB 12 A.3 1-15 GHOERCIAL FISH LANDING 5 FGt NgW YORK WATERS-W LAME gRIE, 1980-1983 1980 1981 1982 1983 Whitefish kg. 79 0 3 3 Walleye kg. 25.032. 18,804 27,5?' 28,749 Smelt kg.- 124 336 494 112 Yellow Perch kg. 41,090 52,581 52.559 26,996 Suckers kg. 3,045 3,753 8,026 6,615 Catfish kg. 73 92 56 73 Fresh Water Drum kg. 2,440 3, 61 8 18,015 15,064 Carp kg. 402 274 173 94 White Bass kg . 2,922 9.183 20,857 8,844 Misc. kg. 487 41 0 1,959 38,270 White Perch kg. 0 0 0 1,864 TOTAL kg. 75,693 89,051 129,618 126,684
- Number of ,
Licenses 17 17 12 13
- I .,
t ' r O -c0M0052381160H ,
/
,, I
1
$ N
< g .V g L ^% ,wr0 ,gyd cara @N st t'
[ pyEld [' CANADA U.S. r U
/
w s W. _--~i IiRI. E.A.
,....=...__
- o. ..,
.. ... , u%..-y ,
l ' .
>%h y <e".a ...o. i I o<. e a a a..e.
m....2..... , g. ..,, .
.. . . . . . .. I
, . ,,. . . , t " ~ aa-
__ _ _ .a ".
. .. t m pq of L a ..a 1 . ..... ' r 8 0 Am """ "'~'-
- = u ".- - -I' ~~' N"'. * "'
~
,,r,,, , ~
..-a
.s.t.,..... e a .....
m
.. - . , i,..
, ,,,, , , s. . . te r. .. c
*- ,.r p .n. .
s.. -
.. 2.u. 4 3 f.. .Gt.Nt.M.t. -
.. l . .W. % L. - <.%.,.,. -
* ~
- .... ! o . . $ .. .a a .. [- -
gj
,,.. g
,,, .,., 647mV % 2.i 8pa7"7". a..- a. .a. . .
. .. ...o.
...... i *"
s.... W* -..... ,
.. ..m.,
.s..
..c
.....~- . 1 l_,.
, i.
... 3 , , .... e. l. ,._ .
.*****'f$.n,,.-..-
. ( o..us 1 n - *" * *o*o
'*" . .\. . y.. _
' d ~ ' .T ' , , , , .
t.......
,.gg .. 334' 0 16 g, -
.m..
1
* .e.. .. ~ ~ 4943. o ona e -
' 'g n
~ fs sA Np s e S '* .,......... ,. *-a v V' .........
3 ..
' - . ..o.
O u . - . b. .
..aaf43
- - e
"- a -~ ~
gg,me, , - ,. (' 13 A ' . '-,;.4..-.
* * .> ~
y y .",<,".3.
- 05 M. . . . . <....o .
- y. /
3
. *" " . .ra.a. ,
g .....i ... .'2 : i..... g W ., ~24 "*"5 . '2 k m 0 1 t
-* 713 2 . " . ..... .o
. ..... . -+ -
Y. i y, 0 , , , , . . , .
. .2ME l . r9 .) ,.
b L. ;, a .F.W. ( ., - => *. . . p
'2013, ,, 2D7 g49g
- s. en,
,., t . . -. . ... .. ... . . . ...
..u
'521
< .. n.~
'*-..~
c ...
. ....u.
2469~
. /. ', , . . ." "., ' .
4... .
- n. . . g i -
SIT -tx ui.o' LT #. -
~
-.s w n _. .t c4.i . .
g7o: 4 ,
.n.1 40 b
. . . - - . _ _ 22
- 22i
, ..;.3 4 . . .u....,
- n. .
......... ........ ,. a.. - - - ~
. . . . . . N. . . . .,.,.
i
... r
... 2 9 . . . . ~
eue"
~ . ..
, 5144 " ' .' h "* "
8"' I. . I 27 i
~
L ; * * * '} g
;y . g
, .. . .r _ ...... .. ,-gg"-
... , . , . m. ..,. 9.. ..,,, . e
.l .
3
- i .
_ "210. . . . .... ...<....1 .;
.< . . . . 18.. ,*. -
~ 1 1 ' **
.x e 34
/
a... T.,
+ n...
p.~ ... , . . . . . ..e.-
.u, ,
. j ,.
.. 1...,c 6 . n .
T.e s..e .o.... 4
..*.(c. '..
' 3.j. .. . . .
i t.. 1.
--- .. g. * ,
"*j?
u8
'."n*n = ...... . . .,,.. !t * .
..o., - 4-
- i n...onq l "> .
.o . . . ,
e- s. t ' ,,,.,, . r ' .a.e - g .y
.. l. . . ,i
(, -".a. r..p . ' ' q[{
.I a.-- T, 3
. 8
( D-J - , . ft., ,
.. .- --2 2T.. se _ P, ENN_S Y LV
'yq,,
- i7 '. .. J
- 6 - _ _ . ,
"---l 1 '"'" .....
Am '
, /. 17' ') i 1
'\ . . ,
. i r . _.h-l- --*--l..
4 .
. _ .1 *'~ --' ' '
,l; .
.' h.-
~ . -
i L
<p,/ l j ., l. -
, - .I . . . .
* / **+-' i
~ 3 e
_, j
.-.9 % u e
, m _
,/ I, .e..- .
a .e
.=.
f q - 10n . . ._ s
\
-. -. ) ! !~ f- . , . -
l ca.==_=
, - ys,e
.. I i ,..
r i g
- n. l "*---\. I k l ; I __
i $ O
m 9' 16KM T s o % y , ggg St, & h 445 926 398 2022
/- .' .,
W 411 1328 E f
/d...'s".~. ... 540 14II s".~..".,""
,,,. ......e 491 721
-e r. .. , . ~. , , o w
,.., . _ IwnSe co .......,u - -.. ...... 535 534 302 t .N( . _.. .. .. . s .,,,, . . . , : / ,e ... .
. , . . , a <.
, v....,._.-..
-. .ox. _
t . .. .v - . g I 10 MILES hen tc. ..., .u. ; , ,.;,, .. ~ . 5 *
.'J.'. +. ."$
g 1, ... . . . . . . . . , .' . . . . . . . . -
.....,..,,,,...s . . .a
- _
, . V. . . . . m., ....... ........ .. o . .. ... ,
L.>.......... , ... .u..i ,,,,,.., ,. , , , , , _ a__,.__ ,:,, + ...~i....s.. _ OhTAhM U s ...... wo. s=oo. .< o. ....,.
...SLS LC A__W
........ 4=,,,, , , , ,
j j .'. '. .. " ]
,,....,i ..
--'- i*",9........- -.
,..... . . . . ~ . .
.~ .
.... .; v.. . .
i... 3
.......... . . _ . . r. . .. -
...... n.....
.: AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE i t,! .c5 ,,','.J. .
. .. . 7
.T. . .n . M, 3,...
'"~.;
j 1~..;;,,.r"'" .
. . . . . 1
[ LAND AREA (ha)
. ?. .. ,,, -. ;,,..,.-. ... % WITHIN 16-80 KILOMETERS ~.. . :
m .. ~ . 3 ...,, . . .
. (10-50 MlLES) 0F THE SITE i :
e ...,. u m, co . -... . ... e. g 1 n..... . , ., ., .. .. . , . . . :
. ...e ~.,...,. ..... 10 0 10 20
- f. . . . . .. .;. .e.". u...... t n s r
-.7 . . . . . . .
2 .,.
*.,,i o. e t
. . . o,,..
+
MILE 5
+~...e.. ,i .. ....... ., . i _
m -- 0 16 32 l s.
...l ,... .... Tom uw n 1,6 lt ' ".' u. g..... s '
i 1.,., .,.,f s.u M. ~N . m- *=u...~ - -]*-
.e.
T KlLOMETERS
.. . ....t : r....a... '"
. ' " " ~ . . . . t) n .
E. i . . . . . . . . . . . .. _ ..,,,,,, y:u _ "'l
- a ""* n. . i'.;
*'* ; ,,.n., m.. 5 f 4'HOL .
t n......., I g,, 4
, g ..... ;. e. .
.. - . . . . ...... s ~ ~ . ... ...... ..
.. - -- w s"
~ .
~ - -
, _. < .......(c ....i .m... o. .~
i ..
.....'"-~ .
y ,... . .. H 3, ,,.. -.... -
. u m a.. m , u ,~u e n s.. m
,c. . : ......- ! -_ n .a . , . . om v. ms
. , g, , , c _ . . _ .. _ v a 9 n g i:.;.,, ,,,, .r-- 1 , y, . , , r, a
- a - ,,, . i e .> n < i
....._,............. .~....
... . ...... 6 y ... ~. .,,u ,,.o i .~ 7.,m . i ~.s i
~~
;- .r:;. "'~
.m . .. . . ~, r... n$ ..~. . .
.z ,l,,,...,. ~ . v, 1. . .a .
...... ._*"- nn smis w.
.e . . .
- e ., : ..... , , . ~..
i
.....m..., .. y . 2 g._ ..
........... .i y, 1<
. . . . u ms..r. s ~ ~ "
vy>
...',,..~."l..m..
t -- ' . . . . .~ -m%,.,..,;. .
- n. ..... ... - ,e
; . .. . . . o ii v. s.o I .,.....f,,,,, ,.w.,_s,,,,,..,, .sco ~.. m n.a a m
*~ -
. w. , . . n . . , s NI A l '' l ' 7" ~,' -
- nl' .
Y*- ,_ . -.m n ., a '" o am
._.N s. L.% .
-. t *-
j j _ -~ C
$ c. t m . sorve .N .n.t.Nis
'~
w ., . # . UNan DePus..rg D pat .C l
- - .~ : . .
i 1 FIGURE A.3.:-20 I ; i x._ :. 4,
~ * , ' ,
,-l ) , , , ,
s V, ;,,.'.' ..
- -- ~_- , , , _ ".; '
.. MAP "A e4 - '
'~ b. - -7_"'~
REFERENCE:
i l 1 ' ~~ U.S. BUREAU OF THE CENSUS, 1970. I
.I 8507030441 & .
.r,
,-s.
35 i ,
,I om3 . rk, '
V --
"+ , 'N
(
,, ' 8 c <
Wf
/
8 V, s p w - . . 3;
.s
?
- gu
...e i, . d.
\ / ~-
.\
, (
/ N]l-iCoe s N[ /' .,,j- s_ j W f4 /j g ,
- --d e,--.
gy14 _ l x , l- -{ s
. 6 i w I
A 19 1 - -"'; '.f N , t i ! N: /
- i l \ 1W, 'r \ qw Q c. a ' t
~~ x .i,
.d , . ;,I . -
Y:> ) ,- i i .) ; p i . .i t. 3 4, . )-. .
.s j
.i ~. _~ s
< lT i ' \ denJh f 2,. j i s ,,,,
_ [@ 9 I I j L ? li ~ 2e r. 2
-- So ngviiie r ,,
C _GlPhj g jn - o 9 71. -
/ ,,
4
,,4 W l o.+. " }
(~!r' _ i' )
^
, i cm p ~x . .
Y' (F 7' 0" 2 l i
\;}
s T4, i g ' SITE y T 0 M. ' t:f W'xL
~ A /
ss15. i "
.e ? . .< c 1
~['F~n,w l v.ci,N,.. ,
j ; 0 e /
,.. E ' S "l G f w
- v. % 6 I / '
I' .
~
U ' I C[ g,on, # .- 4.,J i r -i u :- . : s G. I 1
._,, { - ,
n \ I & ~
\x +
g U \ / l ,/ j 1 r 1 \t ono# AI I t,
,,,,hb / [ , /
N-mbh, J_cg,.,,h i,, - 9 e 8 i , l
, y '.*, / 3g;3
.A .>t. u-ff ,,.. -l
'j; y f[A '4 :i. 5 i E '.
M
'.s, ny 1 ,
u(a
. . ,g f' .4g ' i . , . , .
,F i
.I
/N %, s l e.<o,,
~
s
,A %
I Nhk t ,j, k,- [ ,u I
- - .m . o .
5 0, 5 MILES i l 0 8 KILOMETERS l @ KEY: l 1 SPRINGVILLE HIGH SCHOOL 2 SPRINGVILLE MIDDLE SCHOOL 3 SPRINGVILLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4 ST. ALOYSIUS PAROCHIAL SCHOOL 5 BERTRAND CHAFFEE HOSPITAL 6 WEST VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL 1 O l lNSTITUTIONS IN THE SITE VICINITY l FIGURE A. 31-21
r; A.3 2 NEARBY INDUSTRIAL. TRANSPORTATION AND MILITARY FACILITIES A.3.2.1 NUCLEAR FACILITIES No nuclear facilities are within 80 km (50 miles) of the site. A.3.2.2' INDUSTRIES The few industries in the site vicinity are-primarily agricultural service oriented. Contacts with Cattaraugus County Planning and Chamber of Commerce, and a review of the County Industrial Directory (1981) do not indicate the presence of any industrial facilities that could be construed as hazardous. A land use inventory of Cattaraugus County (County Planning Board and Cooperative Extension Service,1981) identifies the number of individual commercial, professional, service, public and industrial land use sites in each village and hamlet. No significant industrial facilities are identified 7-~ k- / in the site vicinity. A similar land use inventory of Springville and Concord Township in Erie County, prepared for the Erie County Planning Department by the consulting firm Development, Analysis, Planning Associates, Ltd. (1982), does not indicate the presence of any significant industrial facilities in the site vicinity in Springville or the Town of Concord. A.3 2 3 MILITARY INSTALLATIONS No military installations are located in the site vicinity. A.3.2.4 TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES The primary methods of transportation in the site vicinity in Cattaraugus County and Erie County use the highway system shown in Figures A.3.1-2 and A.3.1-3
-COM005222:154H 42
In Cattaraugus County, all roads with the exception of those within the-citi.es g of Olean and Salamanca are considered rural roads. The basic New York State classification scheme for all roads and highways classifies rural roads into six categories - interstate, principal arterial, minor arterial, major collector, minor collector and local. The interstate category includes highways that are part of the national system of interstate and defense highways. None of these exist in the site vicinity. The Cattaraugus County Highway Department maintains the 663 km of road in Cattaraugus County, which form the present county highway system. The New York State Department of Transportation also maintains approximately 423 km of road. The principal state highways crossing Cattaraugus County lie on essentially north-south and east-west corridors. The State Department of Transportation also maintains approximately 72 km of local roads on the Allegany, Cattaraugus and Oil Spring Indian Reservations. The remainder of the roads in Cattaraugus County are within the jurisdiction of the towns. Taken collectively, the towns maintain almost twice as much roadway as the state and the county combined. This 1,859 km of roadway is primarily classified local. Arterial highways are connectors of major population and industrial centers. This category, primarily intra-county, would include many of the state highways and future state expressways. U.S. Route 219, located 4.2 km west of the site, is the only arterial road in the site vicinity. Traffic volume along U.S. 219 ranges from a low average annual daily traffic volume ( AADT) of 2,500 to a maximum of 4,400. The design hour volume is approximately 8 percent of the AADT. Seasonal holiday traffic is as much as 128 percent of the AADT. Approximately 18 percent of the traffic consists of trucks. This route operates at a level of service (LOS) B, which indicates a stable traffic flow, an operating speed of 80 km per hour, and reasonable driver freedom to maneuver (Cattaraugus County Planning Board,1979). 9
-COM005222:154H 43
J Collectors are roads connecting smaller communities and industrial centers to the arterials. They frequently are intra-county in . nature and serve short hauls and cross-county traffic. Three collectors are within approximately 2 km of the site. State Route 240 is 2 km northeast of the site. Dutch Hill Road is 1.8 km west of the site. North of the site, in the Town of Concord, the Dutch Hill Road / Mill Street surface deteriorates and driving conditions discourage use by heavy trucks and throught ' raffic. Rock Springs Road, adjacent to the site on the west, is a collector which serves as the principal site access road. There are fewer than 10 residences on this road. There are no major truck service areas, transportation terminals, or warehouses near the site. The Baltimore and Ohio provides railroad service in a north-south direction, serving the central part of the County. This line is 1 km east of the site at its nearest point. The site is served by a siding from this line. There.are no airports in the site vicinity. The only major aviation facility in Cattaraugus County is the Olean Municipal Airport, located in the Town of Ischua. Regularly scheduled commercial air service was terminated at this airport in early 1972. ., lO-U
-COM005222:154H 44
(3 kJ REFERENCES FGt SECTIONS A.3.1 AND A.3 2 Cattaraugus Area Tourist Bureau, 1976, 1977, 1981. Annual Reports, Salamanca, N.Y. Cattaraugus County Industrial Development Agency, February 1981. Cattaraugus County Industrial Directory, Little Valley, N.Y., Catta augus County' Planning Board, June 1977. Cattaraugus County Land Use Plan,%ittle Valley, N.Y. Cattaraugus County Planning Board Staff, March 1979. The Place! A Justification for the Location of a Regional Tourist Information Center in Cattaraugus County, Little Valley, N.Y. Cattaraugus County Planning Board, Jtrie 1977. Mass Transit Development Plan, Little Valley, N.Y. V Cattaraugus Countmy Cooperative Extension (Undated). Dairy Statistics, Cattaraugus County 1974 and 1980, Ellicottville, N.Y. Dames and Moore, October 4, 1982. DEMOG2 Computer Program Run: West Valley Population Projections, Cranford, N.J. Development Analysis and Planning Associates, Ltd.. February 1982. Southtowns Planning and Economic Analysis Study 1982: For the Erie County Department of Environment and Planning. George Vasiliauskas, Personal Communication, August 19, 1982. Bertrand Chaffee Hospital. Greenberg, Michael R. and Donald Krueckeberg,1973 Long-Range Population Projections for Minor Civil Divisions: Computer Programs and User's Manual, Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Center for Urban Policy f] R esearch. V
-COM005222 :154H 45
O Hilde Rothfuss, Written Communication, July 28, 1982. Springville-Griffith Institute Central School District. Loretta Shuster, Personal Communication, August 19, 1982. West Valley Central School. LUNR User Service,1968. New York State Land Use and Natural Resources Inventory, 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Map overlays: Ashford Hollow, Springville, Collins Center, Sardinia, West Valley. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University. New York State Crop Reporting Service, May 1981. Corn, Wheat and Oats, County Estimates 1975-1980. Albany, N.Y.: New York Department of Agricultural and Markets. New York State Reporting Service, June 1981. New York Agricultural Statistics 1980, Albany, New York Dept. of Agriculture and Markets. gg New York Crop Reporting Service, April 1982. Corn, Wheat and Oats, County Estimates. Albany, N.Y.: New York Dept. of Agriculture and Markets. New York Crop Reporting Service, June 8,1982. New York Crop and Livestock Report. Albany, N.Y.: New York Dept. of Agriculture and Markets. New York State Department of Commerce,1982. Population Projections for New York Counties and Minor Civil Divisions (unpublished). Albany, N.Y. New York State Department of Commerce,1982. I Love New York Camping, Albany, N.Y. New York State Department of Commerce,1980. I Love New York Skiing and Winter Sports, Albany, N.Y. 9 -COM005222:154H 46
() New York State Department of Transportation,1980. Four Sheet New York State Map, Scale 1:250,000, West Sheet, Albany, N.Y. New York State Department' of Transportation, Dates Vary. Plan'imetric Quadrangle Maps, Scale 1:24,000: Ashford Hollow, Springville, Collins Center, West Valley, Sardinia, Arcade, Delevan, Cattaraugus, Ellicottville, Ashford. O'Brien and Gere, January 1980. Western Four County Comprehensive Sewerage Study , WPC-CS-210. Richard D. Miller, Written Communication, November 3,1982. The Regional Municipality of Niagara (Canada) Regional Population Forecast and Distribution, St. Catharine's, Ontario, Canada. Robert J. Ryan, Written Communication, July 27, 1982. New York Division of Milk Control, Albany, N.Y. Salamanca Office of Promotion and Development, July 1980. Tourism j Development in Salamanca, Salamanca, N.Y. Sister Marion Rose, Personal Communication, August 19, 1982. St. Aloysius i School. l l Smith, Stuart , F. , September 1981. Dairy Farm Management, Business Summary, New York,1980. Ithaca, N.Y. : Cornell University Department of Agricultural Economics. l Terry Ryder, Personal Communicetion, July 28, 1982. Cattaraugus County l , Agricultural Extension Service, Ceutty Agent, Ellicottv.ille. 1 l Tom Hattield, Personal Communication, January 24, 1983 Kissing Bridge Ski Area. l
- O l -COM005222 :154H 47 i
U.S. Bureau of the Census, March 1981. 180 Census of Population and Housing, PHC80-V-34, New York. Final Population and Housing Unit Counts, U.S. Dept. of Commerce. U.S. Bureau of the Census, March 1981. 1980 Census of Population and Housing, PHC-80-V-40, Pennsylvania Final Population and Housing Unit Counts, U.S. Dept. of Commerce. U.S. Bure'au of the Census , March 1979. Current Population Reports, Series P-25, No. 796, Illustrative Projections of State Populations by Age, Race , and Sex: 1975 to 2000, U.S. Dept. of Commerce. l l U.S. Bureau of the Census,1970. County Subdivisions, Towns, Indian Reservations , and Places (Map) for New York and Pennsylvania, U.S. Dept. of Commerce. U .S. Bureau of the Census , August 1971. U.S. Censte of Population: 1970 Number of Inhabitants, Final Report PC(1)-A40 Pennsylvania and PC(1)-A34 lll New York, U.S. Dept. of Commerce. Burea's of the Census,1951. U.S. Census of Population: 1950 Number of Inhabitants, Final Report, Pennsylvania and New York, U.S. Dept. of Commerce. U.S. Department of Agriculture Statistical Reporting Service and New York Crop Reporting Service,1980. New York Agriculttral Statistics, Albany, N.Y. U.S. Geological Survey, Dates Vary. Topographic Quadrangle Maps, Scale 1:24,000: Ashford Hollow, Springville, Collins Center, West Valley, Sardinia, Arca'de, Delevan, Cattaraugus, Ellicottville, Ashford. 9
-COM005222 :154H 48
O A.3 3 METEOROIDGY , A.3.3.1 REGIONAL CLIMATOLOGY A.3.3 1.1 General Description of Climate West Valley, as represented by Buffalo, is located near the mean position of the polar front end; hence the weather is variable and changeable and characteristic of that latitude. The normal wide swings of seasonal temperature are moderated somewhat by the influences of Lakes Erie and Ontario. Continental polar and arctic air waves moving southeast from source regions in northwest Canada traverse the area. Passing over the lakes, they pick up heat and moisture which may lead to heavy snowfalls many centimetres in depth in a few hours along the shores of the lakes and on higher ground further inland. () The vigorous interplay of warm and cold air masses during winter and early spring months causes storms which may create strong winds in the range of 80 to 120 km per hour. Winters are vigorous and sometimes severe. Sub-zero temperatures are moderately frequent, with an all-time low of -35*C at Jamestown and -29'c at Buffalo. Summers are short and mild with brief hot spells that last for only one or two days. The growing season averages around ( 150 days with 45 to 51 centimetres of rainfall during the period and very infrequent droughts. A.3 3.2 LOCAL METEOROLOGY A.3.3 2.1 Data Sources l The West Valley Demonstration Project lies approximately 50 km inland from the eastern end of Lake Erie. Off-site data for representation of the general O i (_)
-COM005224:154H 49 l
regiona1 climate and the local meteorological conditions have been taken from the National Weather . Service (NWS) observing stations at Buffalo, New York (on the eastern end of Lake Erie, 55 km north northwest of West Valley, at latitude 42.93* 56' N, longitude 78.73* W) and Jamestown, New York (63 km to the southwest, at latitude 42.1
- N, longitude 79.25' W).
Buffalo has the most complete data record for the Western New York State region and has therefore been chosen as the major data source. But Buffalo's location on the eastern shore of Lake Erie modifies its climate and meteorology, producing a significant increase in annual snowfall. Jamestown is located at approximately the same distance inland as West Valley where lake effects are mitigated though they may still cause some increase in snowfall. Where available, data from the Jamestown station are used for comparison with data from Buffalo to provide a measure of possible lake effects. Recording at the Buffalo NWS station began in 1870, but before 1929 the station's location was changed several times to various locations around the city. Since 1929, the Buffalo station has been located at the airport, though . it has been moved several times, each time less than a kilometre. Between h 1943 and 1960, it was maintained on a rooftop; in August 1960 it was moved to a ground-level position to meet aviation standards and has remained at that location ever since. Parameters such as extremes of temperature and wind speed and average wind speed probably have been affected by this change in the site's exposure. The Jamestown station began recording in January,1850. Its location changed a number of times and there are several gaps in the record until 1922, when it was located on the roof of the City Hall where it has remained ever since. The roof top location probably leads to relatively higher recorded values for wind speeds than would be the case for a ground-level station. O
-COM005224:154H 50
p G More detailed data for analysis of long-term meteorological characteristics have been o.btained from the records of the National Climatic Center. A magnetic tape containing five years of data collected at Buffalo during the period 1973-1977 has been processed t'o provide the data for the joint frequency distribution of wind persistence tables and wind rises in Section A.3 3 2.2.1. A.3.3 2.2 Normal and Extreme' Values A.3 3 2.2.1 Wind Speed and Direction l Average annual wind speed at Buffalo is 19.8 km per hour (kph) and slightly less at West Valley because of the sheltering effect of the moderate terrain features. Table A.3.3-1 shows the average monthly wind speeds and the max'imum recorded speeds and corresponding directions. Highest winds occur in January and February from the west southwest to southwest with monthly averages of over 6 m/s. These wind speeds occur as a result of major winter cyclonic storms passing through the area. The highest recorded wind speed at Buffalo occurred from the southwest in January 1950 and was 41 m/s. The second highest recorded wind speed, also from the southwest, was 31 m/s. The summer winds are lighter; maximum spe :s occur during passage l of thunderstorms. l l The seasonal and annual joint wind speed - wind directions frequency l ! distribution based on 5 years' data from Buffalo are presented in Supplement A.3 3-A. The seasons in order are winter (December-February), spring (March-May), summer (June-August), and autumn (September-November). I I lO 1 ' -COM005224:154H 51 l
a On an annual basis, nearly 38 percent of all winds come from the southwest quarter and are the strongest winds. The gost frequent . wind speeca range between 3 and 7.5 metres per second, and account for nearly 64 percent of all winds in the 5 year period analyzed. The frequency distributions for each of the seasonal periods are very similar to the annual distribution except that summer winds from the south are more strongly represented and speeds are lower. Supplement A.3.3-A also contains the frequency distribution of wind direction persistence for the same annual seasonal periods between 1973 and 1977 for five degree sectors. The same data on wind speed and frequency are also shown in the ferm of wind roses in Figures A.3.3-1, -la -1b, -1c, -1d. The dominance of winds with a southwesterly component is clearly evident in each of the periods. A.3.3.2.2.2 Temperature The temperature and humidity ranges in the region are typical of the humid O continental climatic type. Average summer maxima reach nearly 27aC at Buffalo on Lake Erie and are in the 30-32ac range inland at Jamestown and West Valley. In winter, the average maximum covers the range of -1
- to 1 *C across the region, with the higher temperatures away from the Lake. Minimum temperatures are from 16*C in the summer down to -29' to -32*c in the winter.
Temperature extremes are modest: the maximum recorded values at most localities are about 37' to 38ac. Minimun ve. lues range from -29a to -32=c; the more extreme values occur away from the lakes. O
-COM005224:154H 52
d'* k- Average monthly temperatures and extremes for both Buffalo and Jamestown are shown in Tables A.3.3-2 and A.3.3-3 A.3.3.2.2 3 Humidity Relative humidity varies diurnally with temperature and changes with the absolute amount of water vapor present in the air. Buffalo has available relative humidity data taken at 0100, 0700,1300, and 1900 hours local time since 1960. Table A.3 3-4 shows the normal diurnal range represented by monthly mean values for 0700 and 1300 hours. Values at West valley probably do not differ from those at Buffalo by more than 2 or 3 percent since the region as a whole is generally humid. Absolute humidity data is less readily available. In winter, values range between approximately 1 3 and 3.7 g/m 2and in . summer, between 4.1 and 14.7 g/m 2, () A.3.3.2.2.4 Precipitation Precipitation in the region is bountiful and well distributed throughout~ the year with heavy snowfall in winter and early spring and plentiful rain in the remaining seasons. Total water equivalent ranges from approximately 89 ca at lcw elevation to 114 cm on the hills inland. Snowfalls are typically in the range of 229 to 305 cm with the higher falls occurring near the lake and on the hills. Maximum rainfalls in 24 hours have been recorded at 11.4 to 12.7 cm, but the more normal 24-hour rainfall is between five and eight centimetres. Maximum daily snowfalls of around 63.5 cm have been recorded and falls of 25 to 38 cm are comain.
-COM005224:154H 53
W Table A.3 3-5 shows monthly values for the average water equivalent and the llh maximum and minimum values for Buffalo. Precipitation is uniform on the average; all months receive more than five centimetres. The record shows no months without rain in 36 years. Late summer and autumn is the time of maximum falls. The maximum 24-hour rainfall recorded at Buffalo was 12.55 cm and occurred in September 1979. Maximum water equivalent falls by month are shown in Table A.3.3-6 for both Buffalo and Jamestown; the latter probably represents West Valley more closely. The most striking example of the effect of Lake Erie occurs in winter when the cold continental air generated in Canada moves acr.oss the warmer lake, picks up warmth and mciature, and becomes increasingly unstable, leading to heavy snowfalls on the eastern shore of the lake and the hills further inland. Table A.3 3-7 shows maximum falls fo.' both Buffalo and Jamestown. A.3 3 2.2.5 other climatic variables Sunshine The normal annual number of hours of sunshine is approximately 2100 hours. In summer the daily value is approximately 9 hours and in winter the normal is 3-1/2 hours. O
-COM005224:154H 54 1
("N k--) Evaporation Annual Class A pan evaporation at West Valley is approximately 91 cm per year. This is very close to the annual precipitation, while evaporation from lakes and reservoirs is less than 76 cm. The region as a whole has a. net surplus of water on the average, but may experience some water stress in the middle to late part of the growing season when monthly evaporation rates rise above the precipitation. Thunderstorms and Tornadoes The region averages thunderstorms 30 days each year; of these, approximately two-thirds occur in June, July, and August. Fifty percent of these storms are likely to occur between 1200 and 1800 hours local time. Tornadoes are infrequent and generally not particularly destructive. On the average, one tornado will occur in Western New York State each year, most likely in June. Jamestown was the location of the State's most severe tornado, which struck in () 1945 and caused damage estimated at $5 million. f.25 Buffalo has a normal expectation of 10 days per year of dense fog; light fog - ( occurs much more frequently. Away from the lake at West Valley, five to seven days of dense fog are more likely. f
~
l f I l l r l N
-COM005224:154H 55
. _ _ - .=--
A 3.3.3 ON-SITE METEOROLOGICAL PROGRAM A.3.3 3.1 Description of the Program The measurement program for meteorological parameters at West Valley consists of: [1] A primary location with measurement levels of 10 and 60 metres above ground, located on site; [2] A hilltop location of the site, measuring wind parameters of 10 metres above the ground for the purpose of monitoring regional wind; and [3] Five remote locations which measured wind parameters at ten metres above ground, monitoring local topographically-induced effects over the course of an annual cycle. These sites were dismantled in October 1984. The Primary Monitoring Location - includes measurement of wind speed and wind direction at 10- and 60-metre heights, measurement of air temperature at 10 metres and measurement of temperature difference between the two heights. The standard deviation of the horizontal wind at both heights is calculated from 5-second interval samplings of the direction monitor. Data is recorded directly on a digital data acquisition system with backup on chart recorders. The data is automatically transmitted daily to the Chicago office of Dames and Moore for processing and storage. O
-COM005224:154H 56
4 ("'r
\
The Regional Monitoring Location - measures wind speed and direction; the standard deviation of the horizontal wind direction is calculated in the same manner as for the primary location. The data are transmitted to the primary location and recorded in the same manner. The Five Remote Monitoring Locations - Each location recorded wind speed and direction and standard deviation of the horizontal wind direction on a chart recorder contained in the monitor. The charts were collected every two weeks over the course of one-year and were shipped to the Chicago office of Dames and Moore for editing and analysis. Complete details of the monitoring system and data analysis procedures are contained in Project Technical Memoranda which are located in the Project files. The locations of these sites are shown on Figure A.3.3-2. A.3.3.3 2 Data from the On-Site Monitoring Program () The meteorological monitoring program was operated through a complete annual cycle covering the period October,1983, through September,1984. The data have been summarized in Wind Speed / Wind Direction frequency distribution tables for each of eight instrument locations. Stability class data calculated from temperature data from 10 and 60 metre heights at the primary (on-site) tower are compared by wind sector for both heights, and wind speed / wind direction data are broken out by stability class for these two instrument levels. l Wind roses have also been prepared and are shown in Figures A.3 3-3 through A.3 3-10. Several of these wind roses show topographical ef fects in their prevailing wind directions. The West Valley remote site has a very low l l O I
-COM005224:154H 57
+ . - - , - - - - -,. , _ . - - - - - . _ _ , _ - -
percentage of winds from the east and west and a high north-south cccurrence, lh corresponding to local topography. By contrast, Riceville shows a 10 percent occurrence of easterly winds of less than six miles per hour. These are usually drainage winds moving down the valley slope to the east of the station. A.3.3.4 SHORT-TEllM (ACCIDENT) DISPERSION To calculate the maximum airborne radionuclide concentrations to which a member of the general public could be exposed as a result of an unplanned release, hourly relative dispersion factors (x/Q) at the nearest boundary for each of 16 wind sectors will be calculated using the PAVAN computer code. This code implements the guidance provided in Regulatory Guide 1.145,
" Atmospheric Dispersion Models for Potential Accident Consequence Assessments at Nuclear Power Plandb." The meteorological input for the PAVAN code (in the form of the joint frequency distribution of hourly average wind direction and wind speed by atmospheric stability class) are derived from data collected at the on-site meteorological tower from October,1983, to September,1984 At the on-site tower, wind speed and direction are measured at 10 and 60 metres from the base. The stability classes are determined from the temperature difference between the 10 and 60 metre elevations.
For Design Basis Accident (DBA) assessments, ground-level or elevated releases can be treated. The PAVAN code calculates the maximum x/Q at the site bouncary. This dispersion factor is the largest of the 16 sector x/Q values that are exceeded during 0.5 percent of the time. It is assumed to apply during an accidental release and is used to calculate the dose to a " maximally exposed" person who remained at the site boundary for two hours during the accident. There is a 0.5 percent probability that meteorological conditions 0
-COM005224:154H 58 L.
{'~) during the accident might be so unfavorable that the " maximum" dose calculated by this method would be exceeded. The maximum x/Q thus calculated is 7.07 x 10
-4 at 2,350 metres north of the plant for a ground release and 6.72 x 10-5 at 1700 metres northeast of the plant for an elevated release.
A.3.3.5 LONG-TERM DISPERSION ESTIMATES Estimates of annual average atmospheric transport and diffusion from ground and elevated releases at the West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP) were developed using a variable trajectory Gaussian puff dispersion model formulation, as described in Subsection C.1.b of Regulatory Guide 1.111, Revision 1. Long-term average relative concentration (x/Q) and relative dry deposition (D/Q) values were computed for distances out to 80 km from the plant, based on hourly meteorological data from a 7-station monitoring network surrounding the WVDP, and from the 3 nearest National Weather Service (NWS) s tations. The meteorological data set for the modeling study is described in Supplement A.3 3-C. Dames and Moore's WNDSRF3 wind field model was used to r f generate hourly site-specific 2-dimensional wind fields for input to the Dames y and Moore EPM 3 variable trajectory Gaussian puff dispersion model. These models are also discussed in Supplement A.3.3-C. These site-specific atmospheric dispersion models were used to generate relative dispersion factors (x/Q) for ground and elevated releases. These data are she en in Tables A.3 3-8 and A.3 3-9. l I l i l l lO l
-COM005224:154H 59 l
l
REFERENCES FOR SECTION A.3.3 Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL), 1982. PAVAN: An Atmospheric Dispersion Program for Evaluating Design Basis Accidental Releases of Radioactive Materials from Nuclear Power Stations, NURER/CR-2858, PNL-4413, November, 1982. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, August 1979. - Regulatory Guide 1.145, Atmospheric Dispersion Models for Potential Accident Consequence Assessments at Nuclear Power Plants. O l l l l l l l 9
-COM005224 :154H 60 t
O C O TAB 12 A.3.3-1 BUETALO NATIONAL EATHER SERVICE STATION WIND SPEEDS AND DIRECTI(BIS (MPH) ANNUAL JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. MAY JtBIE JULY AUG. SEPT. OCT. NOV. DEC. AVERAGE
, Average Monthly Wind Speed 14.5 14.0 13.7 13 0 11.7 11.2 10.5 10.0 10.6 11.4 12.9 13.5 12 3 Prevailing Direction WSW SW SW SW SW SW SW SW SW SW SW WSW SW Fastest Mile 91 70 68 67 63 56 59 56 59 63 66 60 Direction SW SW W W SW NW NW SW SW SW SW S
-COM005200:15811 i
O O - O TABLE A.3 3-2 DEAN AND EXTREDE TElfERATLRES (*F) i ANNUAL i JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. MAY JIME Jin.Y AUG. SEPT. OCT. NOV. DEC. AVERAE Buffalo Mean Temperature 23.7 24.4 32.1 44.9 55.1 65.7 70.1 68.4 61 . 6 51.5 39.8 27.5 47.1 Maximum Temperature 72 64 81 87 90 95 94 99 98 87 80 66 Minim'um Temperature -12 -20 -4 12 26 35 43 38 32 20 9 -4 J amestown Mean Temperature 27.3 27.2 35.0 46.3 57.9 66.9 71.2 69.2 63 1 52.6 40.4 29.8 Maximum Temperature 72 70 81 87 93 98 100 97 98 88 80 68 Minimum Temperature -14 -25 -7 13 25 32 37 36 27 19 1 -10
-COM005200:158H 1
O O O I I TABLE A.3 3-3 DAILY MAXINJM AND MININIH TEWERATLEES (*F)
. i ANNUAL
! JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. MAY JtME ' JULY AUG. SEPT. OCT. NOV. DEC. AVERAM Buf f alo Daily Maximum 29.8 31.0 39.0 53.3 64.3 75.1 79.5 77.6 70.8 60.2 46.1 33.6 55.0 I Daily Minimtsn 17.6 17.7 25.2 36.4 49.9 56.3 60.7 59.1 52.3 42.7 33.5 22.2 39.1 l J ames town ' Daily Maximum 35.2 35.7 44.6 57.3 70.1 79.0 83 2 61 . 2 74.8 63.6 48.3 36.9 59.2 Daily Minimum 19.4 18.4 25.0 35.4 45.7 54.9 59.2 57 3 51.3 41.6 32.5 22.6 38.6
-COM005200:15811
O O O l t TABIE A.3.3-4 MONTit.Y MEAN RELATIVE HUMIDITY
- (PERCENT)
ANNUAL JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. MAY JIEEE JULY AUG. SEPT. OCT. NOV. DEC. AVERAE 0700 Hours 35.2 35.7 44.6 57 3 70.1 79.0 83 2 61.2 74.8 63.6 48.3 36.9 59.2 1300 Hours 19.4 18.4 25.0 35.4 45.7 54.9 59.2 57.3 51.3 41.6 32.5 22.6 38.6 1 I i l i i
-COM005200 :15811 h
O O O i TABLE A.3.3-5 MONTHLY MEAN WATER EGIIVAIENT PRECIPITATION (INQlES) RollTHLY MAXIMJH AND MINIMIM VALLES (INQlES) , 5 I. ANNUAL l DEC. AVERAE + JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. MAY JtBIE JULY AllG. SEPT. OCT. NOV. Monthly Mean 2.90 2.55 2.85 3.15 2.97 2.23 2.93 3.53 3.25 3.01 3.74 3.00 36.11 l Monthly Maximum 6.47 5.80 5.59 5.90 6.39 6.06 6.43 10.67 8.99 9.13 6.37 5.02 Monthly Minimum 1.07 0.81 1.20 1.27 1.21 0.11 0.99 1.10 0.77 0.30 1.44 0.69 l
-COM005200:15811 i
_ _ _ _ _ _ =
7-. . T
, m i. -
m _ r-e ,,.
. ~~ :-
F* 2 ,_ M 4 m:3 ._ m t
,*C
! . s - i s .',
* =
{ i g , ,. _. m .T ,, i ~- '--
., _ TASW A.3.3-6 ,.
. -_ . ~s
_'",, WIITit,Y MAXIWM MATEk ESIIVAWIFT FALLS- . ' ^ s { .. (IllGRES) - _ _ . - .- j _ i , . < , s1 __ s.c - - '
.s.
il .W. 1 'N
~,N FEB. APR. MAY JLalE . JtR.Y AUG. ' SEPT. OCT. IIDW . DEC.
JAN. j - MAR. 2.40 2.14 2.0'3 ' 3;04 3.R 3.88 4.94 3 49 2.51 2.16 - Buffalo 2.31 1,71 I
- t 1.62 " 1.66 3.90 2.46 2.83 3.25 4.52 3 15 ' 1. 35 s . ~ 5-Jamestown _.._
2.30 2.98 7 1.90 _ _.
., s s-1 .
- -, x
. - ~ .
- ~
~ ..
- ~
i t s- ,.
. i
- c. ,
,s , ,
* % . + ,
_ t 4 '*
., w e l
~ __ %, .
s l
'^~
p<
-COM005200:158H ._
.e. -
W, h b
*as
*.' s 4 % <*
W A - _ l ! o m . -
.br >
O ~O
~
O O .:
=,
'" N (%.',
K., -. ,
,2< . '%
L* s _
^W y
~
.,_ -~ x, -
e
't .- ,,
j-s n.
- ~
~#
... TABLE A.3 3-7 ,
.- s
~~
v HAX1MJM K)MTILY AND DAILY SNOWAIJS
~
(INQlES) .. l -% - r
~
[ _. SEPT. OCT. NOV. DEC. ANNUAL JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. MAY JLBIE NtLY AUG. s Buffalo 0.0 . 0.0 0.0 T 3.1 31.3 60.7 66.3 Maximum Monthly Fall ' 68.3' ' 5[. 2 29.2 15.0 2.0-0.0 0.0 T 2.5 19.9 24.3 25.3 Maximum Daily Fall 25 3 14.5 15.8 6.8 2.0 T J amestown 7 0.0 0.5 5.0 54.0 67.0 67.0 Maximum Monthly Fall 50.5 30.5 39.9 18.5 0.5 0.0 0.5 T 0.0 0.5 5.0 12.5 14.5 23 0 Maximum Daily Fall 18.0 17 0 23.0 10.0 0.0
-COM005200:15811
(~)' ( -
*g *ai?*
.. ?92222 22222 2 s_- WWW yWWWN 9252X *
. g"*$3r.
. i::e::a k.1M 3 2
- 26:a sx :::s: :
Jias lissi Jsind 4 . 9 tt **222 22222 2
* ***YYT Y? YY
- M*5Ng 4WWWW MMWTM Nn 32gge.::xh'5It3:
- s. :: :::: ::s :
- Jaddd JJJm's 44444 .
**tt
[83 9 g *YYYYY ggggy ggggy TY1t222 .*2222 2 gyggg g 2 , a. rv
- se: a ::::n ::::x.:
822:* 2322S NN 2" :
. adlaa aaisi sad 44 i 8;.
er 2 98889 ill?? ??S?i i sx~ e.s. .n .r,n
- -e -s .: s. u s. s.
22 - es:$ snxxxn.N ::"I: w gg - $*n ..ono a m -- . JJaas sa 44 diada-A 6s IE a W s:8 5 - 2 I8789 I9998 99977 ?*
= = -
-st g- 8 s.= un. n.s.r . :e=~nn:~k *
. .:~:3 :s 3, s,s eg x, ,..,2:,,
ci
= an : .
g ar-o . - I C 5" u "3 E, E , s* 3 IIIII IIIII fifIt i - r'T - a- . gs e
\'j m.
< 'H.
- D o.
- k. "
x v.sens n
- I$y exswa s x.f.n ans
.. 33.:#'E22.
..u o n 3 $. e o -
D bbbb .bENN bbSkN N cn m e J 4 C
" * ?? ?? k @ ?
m :x n smsex s W
=m .
a 5*
- ~O E*83y . an--- . E.I o .37;25 J "
fa 35*9"
- nam '...n--
3 "1" -.nn. i i"
- i '.-
g , aa
? ? ? ?
4
. vn=rn vnene nrs== s I":e"
=* -
o
*0p:5 5R3*.:
- s : ::::
n st: $
- 7.a e jf2 ;. 4444J 24444 ad4JJ J
.:* 3
- 5 99999 999?I IIYYY Y lE!3- 2 a vensy; :m=as:n re ser:s8:::: e
- 5 s sens :
":8 g 8222 :2334 423:: #
*g assad dadia di;Ja J g
.v. 8 *
*I!
- a. . 9 I88.88 8. I3 ^? .3 ^? ? f d. i. 3 Wir I Md*MW 33 WM RW50M y s ::sx: $:ge:3.28"en:x kT.228 a 2
$e.8 3 :358:
a:::: a:aa; is aa a ys]s, g C'g E d a!d $53 38388 SR228 88383 3
>-s I arg saaja sessa asaea e
"'* : 0"*2n aang2 A
]W
- :: '*g-gs isv 2
( ) s_ s v
(~
;h 9 22222 22222 22222 2
/ g
.EEggr**genWTeren nsfig s
. ::::.::.; :::ns::x;2 ::
aaaa; asaaa :::a a
**2.2222 22222 22222 2 un g sess: n:
~rIeievenslsas g -
2 12. assa: :: : saaaa saaaa aa :a i g hktshY kh222 22222 2 189. ~V
- Egunsxgersrurvwe
~
vr ::: ::: :~ s :
- sex:n ::::: sE:ss:a
;g saaa: :Ada aiasi i f8 5 592 j 9I999 88898 a ????8 9 er -
as : IeEennl5vIxerrn: S e :na~ W w se
.sv
.....-----.45.":
8584594%:93 i;4.- . a ss- . E 088 - I891I IIlli 1899I I =
-sg 8xxIxxxxgErvngs c2 w is =
= ag q,4(-(- q:,qqq a
.s q....4 g ge:S p.....
wra q o, , .---- I w A a." eee (~ - i m
. y
= ..: surws argen 3
essng2~cML 3 y
's . "C
- k .-- OXF K2*228 i
gks: GE.s:s : w 8 e.
- aas saa : casi:
a u e kkk
"- ;-: neenx xyrrs sexnr v 5o o g;;gg g,;;; ggg:g ;
v1 y_a . j'*=
- - 2:;2% 2:35: 3
- asai asaa: asas; et A 9
> In
- n } *= e sys;s s;9;s ;sss: s cr s 2.
- - 9.g.: g.., ,5;.; ; -
>< gcr r :-o
' : I~ng nase. :.an-8 ~$ .3
- e:a.,
s *agao -
, o a ., 5 aq n. . ea
..an.
y .! o g. --.o.
-: 3=
E 5 e IIIII IIYIY YIIII I
- wness sveux xasns x f!-
l -:= s
~
- g:~a
- n:$$ k::2:" -e ::Rq:::: : : : s 2
g ( g::5
.g asiaa aa ; aa e :
W. N-svr e 9 IIIII IIIII 88III I , I sexes nrn-s vegns e e 2 s.
.sg a :2::: exan:::
snes: !n ~:.::L:::: :: aaaaa assaa ::::: a. gg, g _ss - s 3 3 !s- a 88838 88388 s saaa s
>-5 t0se:~
0~3 asssa "sasa gassa
'**: . 22n :Nana 2
(' cfr ist -== ix })
< ~ - .
N 4-O NNW 5.00 NNE 3.80
- NW -
NE 5.30 4.10 l t WNW ENE 5.60 - 4.90 1.47 j g 1 15
- 6. O fi!iti! PERCENT M q.5 CALM
, ,, 00 O WSW 6.80 3.60 ESE l
- SW -
_ SE 6.50 3.90 SSW SSE 5.30 3.90 3
- 1. 40 NUMBERS ANDICATE SECTOR NERN WIND SPEED l WIND SPEED RP.NGE FIGURE A.3.3-1 U 0.0-3.0 MPS METEOROLOGICRL MONITOR]NG E 3.0-7.5 BUFFALO SURFACE ORTA 5 7.5-12.5 WEST VALLET NUCLEAR SERVICES 12.5-17.5 Q E >17.5 10-METER WINO FREQUENCT DISTRIBUTION JANURRT.1, 1973 - DECEMBER 31, 1977
N 4.5 O NNW 5.30 NNE 4.30 NW NE 5.50 4.40 WNW . ENE 5.90 5.30 l
/
is s 18 41 l y 1. 3tl 6 6.90 !ili! PERCENT M 4.s CALM N O: WSW 7.80 w a? - ESE J 3.80 SW SE 8.10 4.00 SSW SSE 6.40 4.30 3 5.30 NUMBERS INDICATE SECTOR MEAN WIND SPEED HIND SPEED RANGE FIGURE A.3.3-Ia C 0.0-3.0 MPS METEOROLOGICAL MONITORING E 3.0-7.5 BUFFALO SURFACE DATA
@ 7.5-12.5 WEST VALLET NUCLEAR SERVICES 12.5-17.5 Q >17.5 10-METER OIND FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION WINTER DATA (DECEMBER - FEBRUART)
JANUART 1, 1973 - DECEMBER 31, 1977
l l l N l NNW 4.3 NNE ! O s so u oo ! i NW NE ! 6.10 4.50 i WNW ENE 6.40 ' 5.50
'o ' 16 pt 1.33 5
- 6. O i!li! PERCENT M 5.00 CRLM l
0 70 0' O WSW O 7.10 ESE 4.00 J-a:D d' 3-SW SE 6.40 4.30 l SSW SSE 5.10 4.30 3 l 4.50 NUnBERS INDICATE SECTOR NERN WIND SPEED WIND SPEED RANGE FIGURE A.3.3-I b _ O 0.0-3.0 ne5 MEfEOROLOGICALMONITORING E 3.0-7.5 BUFFALO SURFRCE DATR 5 7.5-12.5 WEST VALLET NUCLEAR SERVICES E 12.5-17.5 10-METER HIND FREQUENCT 01STR1BUTION
>17.5 SPRING DRTR (MARCH - MRT)
MARCH 1, 1973 - MRT 31, 1977
N 37 O NNW 4.40 NNE 3.70 NW NE 4.20 3.70 WNW ENE 4.20 3.80 1.89 eose' ? y - ? 4.60 K PERCENT CALM
] E 3.sg s -
O WSW ESE 6.10 l 3.20 i l SW SE 5.70 3.50 SSW SSE 4.60 3.40 3 3.70 NUMBERS INDICATE SECTOR NEAN WIND SPEED WIND SPEED RANGE FIGURE A.3.3-Ic 0 0.0-3.0 HPS METEOROLOGICAL MONITORING E 3.0-7.5 BUFFALD SURFACE DATA 5 7.5-12.5 WEST VALLET NUCLEAR SERVICES
- 12. 5 17.5
$ *17'8 10-METER WIND FREQUENCT DISTRIBUTION SUMMER ORTA (JUNE - AUGUST 1 JUNE 1, 1973 - AUGUST 31, 1977
l 1 i N 3.7 I > NNW NNE 4.90 3.60
- NW NE 4.90 3.80 WNW . .ENE 5.20 4.30 l
rosat Y }6 y 1.30 5 1 5.70 E! PERCENT M y,3k l CALM i l
~
i >WSW , ESE 6.30 st' 3.S0 t' ,
;i SW .SE 6.20 3.90 SSW SSE 5.60 3.80 3
4.40 NUMBERS INDICATE SECTOR NEAN WIND SPEED WIND SPEED RANGE FIGURE A.3.3-Id U 0.0-3.0 MPs METEOROLOGICAL MONITORING 3.0-7.5 8UFFALO SURFRCE ORTR
$ 7.5-12.5 WEST VALLEY NUCLEAR SERVICES I
12.5-17.5 10-METER WIND FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION U >17.5 FALL DATR (SEPTEMBER - NOVEMBER) SEPTEMBER 1, 1973 - NOVEMBER 31, 1977 g -
i = 8 (5 y aM}, [4,'g
, w 's . .. - {, '
\ -
, "'" g Vg--s.+ -W -- 4, A. .m .
a s N .. ..
,j. ./g.
* . *l' '
h a b u
.- .,/ > - &
h! c ~ : d_; !.
; 434 ,
3, g
, s., ,s . - ,
^y ,
. g,[_. f. i 4
...,^I g #Mw i s ,
4 . [ 5s h 9 . F, .y>d g/ i >^W - 'af 7,; - [ ~@ i:- . q~ , - 1 m ds 4 tt , ww'.- :- m 2,
' Y i*
p* I3
~~
t
-*'. *-,g 0 e ,
g M. a .g 4. l g,- ,.fN ; ,g y .. -
. ._ l- - _. ' ' '
'J " .a s h ,' ' p" -
-.,,,L .
% ;.; W :. m
,f,g , _ gJ ] -, , ,
.,. p - -
p u h ,l. n. '{ ! ' a
,\, '
i c y ---- [- t.g , ~ W K. r 3; y p- ,.. s n is.
~
o, ,( c A . ..a-7 'o
'q'., '-
e 4
/' _
," a- /. # ),/ --
/ A.sier . ,, . O -
/ e'-'~ , .
.tc y.f,,,e.. ' ~.,Q -. N - (L t' q ,.. x' j .
g
- , /,. .., ~-
y v...-s es ., u. .. , g , \.
. .j, ,Q. , e /j -s *
%5.,
*. __~,s
.r%, %. si g*\,,
s
.4 ,
.f 1,,,, 4cartamaueve,- ,
&, N in.
f-
-+s-- +
e= u t _ 'g.f > . ,,._. _ - , - - ~ --y
. k--
_._ 9 3e ,
. , -m) 4, ; ,4m ye 4~ ,; ,, a5 (1 -(
y fi '
, n~j 's. e-ml,j ) /.? , f.___&shf ', ;
-' ., --- (WEy,.}4;_ .
?',,
..y _
-'si1 \; m a
w.
,,,, T f ' .,,
s,, r wi
.-k s-'%',,' ^ - .
s.. (_ ,r,0s l ;:.,. 7 r ; ,, ,.
~( ,. ' 3 .Y.g.- I $~. j f [.g=*- - /[N
~- - ' , . ",' .: ' ,,.
'{2t-- ',' \ of y }~ LNf ' .- .
,. : s - Wx ,m:$<~' , - ay I' -fj/, ; ..
,s w ,'j-, ',
j,-i,
't-
/
. N.
7x. ,M i ,A,]ss (3i a O ,- ( \ ,
,3
. . {,
- - -i, a s.m s .
m 3..
. \, . .-
8'# - k_'. s.- , ),.. .f . 3, f., . , ' ,s s . N. 4 - eA l \y.
;.%' 4 A s. . 4 4; / t's
,7
.t
* # \,.' \x
t k .- ~. .=(.'$ 7 , ,
'a g
v d',x,- }. ]-n % -
. ,,.n-a
, ;&, . m. ,n.m -;m7
..:, 1
\ ~
-b' L, . ;-
.w.v. .;: .
- !: g ,
s e i. V. N\A, my , w_a 1 o
-.<.n z,..,.
- v
., - .. n w g m3-
- g. , -. .. , - -
'; y 5',y b 7 r w , _' n 'r. .,C ,s '$
~h'; ~.,.
_ y 2. p- l,u. q, ,. y e,- -.- .
.c,, !
t . a.a.,u, - t
, g.
.3
- s. /s. ,. . x s u. ,- s v,.,
t i.;
,)s?., y;. _sy ye,
, c~
- c. s -
2
. 'l
.) '
- i'( . =. "
~
'g .n -
4 -
' ,,- l '3} tp.,
r,,
' ' i, ,,,
=t- -en I
ap - , A. 1'. I' f-
/
sg, ,- ., s -- . m , ; i
~: .
*a4=ng-l --- - , - - .,__ ...
'i
,~' ,
s ;,q j' ,
/ l
- i.
#/ g-(DH ;' LO, j . ' i-
>1 e
- s ;_-z ..< / .
s . -. ._q[ .J 1 4 -x2 p.. 9 s 4 . c
.u.
; ~.,
~' I
, . w__ T,n
.r 1 i ,y ' -
' , .*"?,2' ... .\
,;, p -
l! i i 4 . t "l',,,,,. a
% n t
. ' .' i., e-- .'. _, . b. e. c.. ; ' .w , ,
w: ,.
. '~4,~.~ a u. V. -
~.Q.t.:L o s m' T'v_o L)[A r .t
[ . ; m ys ' f.4 i
.' j,j N .1 -. 's --
1
; - , #' .m . 4 p. ,
# ,'<<- ,/ ; A ,
~
w WEST VALLEI EMONSTR TION 3Rb]Ed , j bk '[ [ ' l. S '
/.3 L- ,q/,'t
. METEOROLOGY MONITORING NETWORK 7._ 3
'\ =s . <x a & , 33 ru- r h .. - < -
l 3 t . .. , a m m a
< "s i . u s
,) -
j-At ,, -- ! <. , , 14. FIGURE A.3.3-2
N 0- NNW 3.00 2.5 NNE 2.30 NW NE 3.00 - 2.20 WNW ,
,J-
'ENE 2.40 2.50 coss' f 0.00 e 1
- 2. O E PERCENT CALM
] 2.s O'
WSW 2.30 q ESE 2.s0
- 1. -
E m SW SE 2.50 2.80 SSW SSE 2.20 g 3.10 2.40 NUMBERS INDICATE SECTOR MEAN WINO SPEED WINO SPEED RANGE C 0.0-1.5 Mes FIGURE A.3.3-3 E 1.5-3.0 METEOROLOGICAL MONITORING
@ 3.0-5.0 WEST VALLEY NUCLEAR SERYlCES ' ' ~
O E > 7.5 10-METER WIND FREOUENCY DISTRIBUTION PR! MARY SITE 10-METERS . OCTOBER 1,1983 - SEPTEMBER 30,1984 l l l
~
N O NNW 4.30 3.3 NNE 3.10 NW NE 4.90 2.70 WNW ENE 5.10 2.80 5, 'l -- d s', r, , pt 0.05 7 1 q,$g l titilit PERCENT E 3 . 45 CRLM a
' g O WSW = ESE 3.50 l
4.80 ,, ill 's, SW SE 4.50 3.50 SSW SSE 4.20 g 4.10 4.60 NUMBERS INDICATE SECTOR MEAN WINO SPEED WINO SPEED RANGE C 0.0-1.5 Mes FIGURE A.3.3-4 E 1.5-3.0 METEOROLOGICAL MONITORING
@ 3.0-5.0 WEST VALLEY NUCLEAR SERVICES O ' 5 ~7 5 60-METER WIND FREQUENCY DIST RIBUTION
> 7.5 PRIMARY SITE 60-METERS OCTOBER 1,1983 - SEPTEMBER 30,1984 -
N 2.7 O NNW 3.40 NNE 3.10 NW NE 4.30 3.60 WNW ENE 4.80 4.10
~
I Ab
~
ps f f 0.12 e i
- s. O E E'!'I'! PERCENT CALM i q,h 0'0' ,,
5 O WSW 4.90
!!I,l ESE 4.60 SW SE 4.20 4.60 SSW SSE 4.80 g 5.20 l 5.70
. NUMBERS INDICATE SECTOR MEAN WINO SPEED WINO SPEED RANGE C 0.0-1.5 MPs FIGURE A.3.3-5 E 1.5-3.0 METEOROLOGICAL MONITORING
@ 3.0-5.0 WEST VALLEY NUCLEAR SERVICES E 5.0-7.5 lema = mwm ===
O e , ,*s REGIONAL SITE 10-METERS OCTOBER 1,1983 - SEPTEMBER 30,1984
N O NNW 3.3 NNE 4.10 3.00 . NW NE 3.70 1 3.20 WNW ENE 3.30 . 2.s0
~:, --
O. 5t1 L
#W n 1 W PERCENT 3,ik 2.s0 CALM O / s ESE WSW 3 3.40 2.30 b
Z SW .... SE 3.60 3.30 SSW SSE 3.50 g 3.20 3.40 NUMBERS INDICRTE SECTOR MEAN WINO SPEED WINO SPEED RANGE 0.0-1.s MPs FIGURE A.3.3-6 . E 1.5-3.0 METEOROLOGICAL MONITORING WEST VALLEY NUCLEAR SERVICES
@ 3.0-5.0 5.0-7.s 10-METER WIND FREOUENCY DISTRIBUTION
> 7.s WEST VALLEY REMOTE SITE OCTOBER 1,1983 - SEPTEMBER 30,1984
l 1 N O Ngw 2.s0 gne 2.20 3.00 NW NE
,4.00 2.00 WNW ENE s.00 2.20 aces f f
* *, o, , ,
0.34 8 1 W 4 s0 E EEliti!i!!E PERCENT M3 2. s CALM
~
n -:-: 'e V WSW ESE 4.70 ilii 2.90
)
SW SE 4.00 3.20 SSW SSE 3.80 g 4.20 4.80 NUMBERS INDICRTE SECTOR MEAN WINO SPEED WIND SPEED RANGE C 0.0-1.s MPs FIGURE A.3.3-7 E 1.5-3.0 METEOROLOGICAL MONITORING
@ s.0-5.0 WEST VALLEY NUCLEAR SERVICES-O E 5 o-7 5 10-METER FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
> 7.5 RICEVILLE REMOTE SITE OCTOBER 1,1983 - SEPTEMBER 30,1984
N O NNW 3.40 2.4 NNE 1.80 NW NE 4.00 2.00 WNW ENE 4.30 , 2.30
~'
' 3,
'o r r pt 1.17 7 1 g,$a EN PERCENT E 2.4 CALM
,, ', s'
? .
O~ WSW 3 ._ ESE 5.00 C- 2.20 lll SW SE 4.10 2.80 SSE SSW 3.80 g 3.20 4.40 NUMBERS INDICATE SECTOR MERN WING SPEED WINO SPEED RANGE FIGURE A.3.3-8 0.0-1.5 MPS E 1.5-3.0 METEOROLOGICAL MONITORING
@ 3.0-5.0 WEST VALLEY NUCLEAR SERVICES E 5 -7 5 O E *75 10-METER FREOUENCY DISTRIBUTION CATTARAUGUS REMOTE SITE OCTOBER 1,1983 - SEPTEMBER 30,1984
N 2.7 p' v NNW 2.80 NNE 2.10 NW NE 3.60 2.50 l WNW ENE 4.10 ,, y 2.00 0, 5 U
%< ,ese' f f 1.36 e 1 N E!i!M PERCENT ]
g,go 1.s CALM
,l - - ,
' ll ESE O WSW 4.20 J_.
\
1.90 l llll SW SE 4.70 2.30 SSW SSE 4.30 g 3.10 4.30 NUMBERS INDICATE SECTCR NERN WING SPEED WINO SPEED RANGE C o.0-1.s Hes FIGURE A.3.3-9 E 1.5-3.o' METEOROLOGICAL MONITORING E 3.0-5.0 WEST VALLEY NUCLEAR SERVICES l E s.0-7.s 10-METER FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION E > 7.5 CONNOISARAULEY REMOTE SITE OCTOBER 1,1983 - SEPTEMBER 30,1984
N 2.20 O NNW 2.30 NNE 2.60 NW NE 3.10 2.90 WNW ENE 3.10 g 3.20 4 ,
~ '
,, q s 3.14 6 1 3.80 l'I'!: ! I PERCENT E 3, ,E, CALM i
,0000 O WSW 3.60
,8 2'
d Sl ESE 3.20 M SW SE 2.70 2.90 SSW SSE 2.70 g 3.00 3.20 NUMBERS INDICATE SECTOR MERN WINO SPEED WINO SPEED RANGE C 0.0-1.s Mrs FIGURE A.3.3-10 E 1.5-3.0 METEOROLOGICAL MONITORING E 3.0-5.0 WEST VALLEY NUCLEAR SERVICES s.0-7.5 10-METER FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION O 0 > 7.5 SPRINGVILLE REMOTE SITE OCTOBER 1,1983 - SEPTEMBER 30,1984
O -\) 1 A.3.4 SURFACE HYDROLDGY A.3.4.1 HYDROIAGIC DESCRIPTIOIf The WVDP and areas surrounding the site are drained by two creeks, Buttermilk and Cattaraugus' Creeks as shown on Figure A.3.4-1
~
Buttermi1k Creek flows through the site in a generally northwesterly direction from its origin south of the town of West Valley, New York and joins Cattaraugus Creek at the north end of the site some eight stream kilometres below the point of entry onto the site at Ricev111e Station. Buttermilk Creek has eroded a narrow, deep defile into the glacial deposits in the valley on which the site is situated. The Project facilities are located on a bench-like plateau at an elevation of about 431 3 m above sea level datum. The elevation of Buttermilk Creek at its entrance to the site is about 365.8 m and the creek falls to an elevation of sligntly nven 335 3 u at its confluence () with Cattaraugus Creek. The total drainage area of Buttermilk Creek is
~
estimated to be 48,215 ha. The U.S. Geclogical Survey maintained a gauging station on Buttermilk Creek from October 1961 to September.1968. The gauge was located at the Hays Hollow Road (Bond Road on USGS Ashford Hollow quaorangle map) bridge, two kilometres upstream from the mouth of the creek. The drainage area above the gauge is 46,500 ha. Pertinent flow data are summa,rized in Table A.3.4-1. Cattaraugus Creek flows in a generally westerly direction from the site to Lake Erie some 63 km downstream. The total drainage area is estimated to 877.350 ha. Since 1939, the U.S. Geological Survey has maintained a gauging station on Cattaraugus Creek at Gowanda, New York, some 32 stream kilometres below the site. The drainage area above the gauging station is 683,000 ha. V
-COM005226: 154H 61
The drainage area of Cattaraugus above the confluence of Buttermilk Creek is 344,600 ha; thus the average flow in Cattaraugus Creek past the site may be estimated to fifty percent
- of the average flow rate at the gauging statian.
Figure A.3 4-2 shows the comparative flows of Buttermilk and Cattaraugus Creeks for the year 1968 (the most recent year that USGS maintained gauges on both' streams). No public water svpplies use Buttermilk or Cattaraugus. Creeks as a source of potable water. The village of Springville operates a dam / hydroelectric generating station on Cattaraugus Creek approximately 4 xm below the confluence of Buttermilk and Cattaraugus Caeeks. A.3.4.1.1 Site And Facilities Figures A.3.4-3 and A.3.4-4 show the drainage pattern of the site and adjacent areas. Figure A.3 4-3 also identifies the existing Project facilities, including the low level waste treatment lagoons. No significant Project construction other than that indicated in this figure is currently envisioned. h The entire WNYNSC is shown in Figure A.3.4-4. This figure includes the two t-Project water supply reservoirs which were created by damming two small tributaries of Buttermilk Creek. A.3.4.1.2 Hydrosphere The West Valley Site is underlain by at least two aquifers, neither of which are considered highly permeable. The upper aquifer consists of the saturated portion of the surficial gravel deposits ranging in thickness from about 1.5 m to 6.0 m. The second aquifer consists of a zone approximately 0.5 m thick of decomposed shale and rubble at the interface of the fill and bedrock.
"It is realized that flood level discharge is not directly proportional to the drainage areas. Therefore, this estimate could be low depending upon the locations of the storm center.
-COM005226: 154H 62
The upper aquifer is involved in the surface hydrologic cycle whereas the lower aquifer is isolated by a thick layer of glacial fill in the vicinity of the site. The approximate direction of groundwater flow in the surficial unit - (based upon water level measurements) is easterly or northeasterly from the weJtern boundary of the site. Most of the water in this unit drains into Frank's Creek, either directly or via one of its tributaries. The grour.dwater hydrology of the site is discussed in Section A.3.5.
.The surface water regime of the WVDP includes several arall tributaries of Buttermilk Creek, the on-site low-level waste treatment lagoons and the two water supply reservoirs in addition to Buttermilk and Cattaraugus Creeks. The Buttermilk Creek tributaries include Frank's Creek, Quarry Creek, and Erdman Brook. The plateau on which the Project facilities are located is dissected by the steep walled valleys of these streams and surface run-off from the plr as is directly into these channels via drainage ditches and culverts.
() The on-site low-level waste treatment facility includes four lagoons, the largest of which contains a controllable discharge pipe to Erdman Brook. Of these four lagoons, numbers 4 and 5 are very small feed and effluent holding basins, but Lagoon 2 can hold 12.2 million litres and Lagoon 3 can hold 13.4 million litres. (There used to be another basin, Lagoon 1, in this system. This tasin was decommissioned in 1984.) The two onsite reservoirs were created by damming branches of Buttermilk Creek to an elevation of 414.5 m MSL, impounding 824,100 m3 of water at this elevation. A.3.4.2 FLOODS A.3 4.2.1 Flood History Because Cuttermilk and Cattaraugus Creeks lie in deep valleys, little area is available for farming or housing; thus the effects of any flooding of the flood plain have been minimal and no history of floods in the area is 1
-COM005226: 154H 63
available. The data on water flows in Buttermilk Creek and Cattaraugus Creek llh (refer to Table A.3 4-1) inclitded data on the maximum recorded flows. These flows correspond to maximum gauge heights of 4.3 m on Cattaraugus Creek and 2.6 m on Buttermilk. The levels would cause only local flooding on the flood plains well below the elevation of the nuclear site facility. The Chief, Flood Plain Management Services, Buffalo District, Corps of Engineers, stated in a letter to Nuclear Fuel Services, quoted in the NFS, 1973 SAR:
"We do not feel that the 100 year flood stage of Buttermilk Creed will affect your proposed plant as it is at least 120 feet above the creek. The drainage area of Buttermilk Creek, upstream of your plant, is too small to be able to provide enough water to raise the creek state the necessary 120 feet. In addition, before the creek stage could rise even 110 feet, it would spill over the divide on the west bank and flow down the valley of a tributary."
A.3.4.2.2 Flood Design Considerations Because the creek valleys can contain the floods without affecting the Project areas, flood design considerations need not be included in facility designs. A.3 4.2.3 Effects of Local Intense Precipitation Probable maximum precipitation events (PMP) have been developed for the plant site, Buttermilk Creek, and the plant reservoirs based upon Hydrometeorological Report 33 and the foll'owing drainage basin areas: Buttermilk Creek 7903 ha. Plant Site 606 ha. Plant Reservoirs 1257 ha. 9
-COM005226: 154H 64
The PMPs are fully described in Supplement A.3 4-A. The resulting water levels in Buttermilk Creek for the PMP and the PMP increased by 50 percent were at least 50 metres below the plant elevation and could therefore not influence the plant area. The plant site was evaluated in a similar manner. With the PMP increased by 50 percent, water levels in Frank's Creek reach c maximum elevation of 53 metres below plant grade, when routed through the reservoirs, the PMP results in water elevations approximately 2.6 metres above the crest of the dams, resulting in dam failure. However, such a failure cannot flood the plant area due to the depth of the Buttermilk Creek valley below the dams. The winter PMP (snow and liquid) for the WVDP was estimated in Nicholas and Eagan (1983) using 100 year snowpack depths from Syracuse, New York, and snowpack density conversion method of Bilello (1969), using a density of 0.25 () with water equivalent snowpack depths of 44.5 and 36.8 cm for February and March, corresponding to snowloads of 444.3 kg/m 3 and 368.6 kg/m3 p 3peettyety, A.3.4.3 PROBABLE MAXIMUM FLOOD As indicated above, flooding of the plant area is not a possibility because of the deep valleys of Buttermilk and Cattaraugus Creeks. The various studies undertaken to verify and support this conclusion are detailed in Supplement A.3.4-A. - Although a probable maximum flood in buttermilk Creek and a catastrophic railure of the reservoir dams cannot flood the plant site, these events would probably affect the plant water supply system because the supply of water from the reservoir would be eliminated until repair could be made. No processes or facilities at the WVDP would represent a problem if the water supply was lost, however.
-COM005226:154H 65 i
A.3 4.4 POTENTIAL DAM FAILURES (SEISMICALLY INDUCED) O As identified in Supplement A.3.4-A, the on-site reservoirs cannot contain the PMP, resulting in dam failure. Furthermore, the dams creating the reservoirs were not designed to withstand a design basis earthquake, and can therefore be expected to fail if such an earthquake is experienced. However, it 'has also been demonstrated that the Buttermilk Creek valley is sufficiently large to accommodate the reservoir volumes and prevent flooding of the plant areas. A.3.4.4.1 Reservoir, Pumphouse and Pipeline Descriptions The plant water supply system (Figure A.3.4-5) consists of two interconnected lakes formed by earthen dams at the southeastern end of the site near Riceville Station. The railroad siding to the plant passes over a culvert in Buttermilk Creek and Dams 1 and 2 as it approaches the plant. The dams are constructed on compacted, impermeable soil meeting the specifications of the State of New York, Department of Public Works. The characteristics of the dams are shown in Table A.3 4-3 Sheet piling was driven to a depth of 10.7 m across a 18.3 m width of the old O stream bed in the base of Dam 1 to prevent seepage through the base of the dam. Due to its lower height, piling was not installed under Dam 2. The design elevation of the lake system is controlled by an overflow weir in the pumphouse in Lake 2 at an elevation of 412.4 mMSL. The total storage capacity at this level is 559,600 m3 (refer to Figures A.3.~-6 through A.3.4-8 for the elevation-capacity curve for the reservoir). In order to provide additional surge capacity in the lakes to cushion the effects of sudden increases in run-off, a small 60 cm x 60 cm port was cut into the overflow weir at an invert elevation 411.7 mMSL, and the lake system is normally maintained at this level with a storage capacity of about 504,300 m . 3This port could be closed after the spring runoff to provide additional storage in the event that an extended dry period were anticipated. O
-COM005226: 154H 66
f
\' # An emergency spillway is installed in Lake 1 to provide flood relief for both lakes. The spillway elevation is 412.7 mMSL and the spillway is 53 m wide at the bottom with the sides graded to slopes of 1 on 1-1/2. Thus, the spillway width increases to a width of 59 m at the 414.5 mMSL elevation. The spillway discharges into Buttermilk Creek.
The drainage area of the lake system is about 1255 ha with about 810 ha draining to Lake 1 and 455 ha draining to Lake 2. The annual precipitation in the area is about 107 cm and with an assumed 51 cm of runoff, the average flow through the lake system is about 0.2 m3 /s or some 12,100 litres per minute. The pumphouse is equipped with two pumps discharging to Class-150, 20 cm cast iron pipeline buried 1.5 m below grade. Normally, one pump is in service and the other is in standby although both pumps can be operated simultaneously, if needed. The pipeline discharges to 1,800 m3 storage tank at the processing plant and to the High Level Waste Storage Facility. () The pumphouse shown in Figure A.3.4-9 is located in Lake 2 about 18 m west of Dam 2 in about 9 m of water. A 4.3 m by 4 3 m square reinforced concrete caisson is mounted on a 0.9 m concrete slab which is itself supported by piling. The walls of the caisson are 38 cm thick and extend upward to the 414.5 m elevation with a 20 cm slab at the top which forms the floor of the pump' house . A central well is located within the caisson to serve as an overflow to maintain the lake system at a constant elevation. The overflow drains through a 0.9 m diameter pipeline to the ravine below the dam. A flood gate at the bottom of the central well can be opened to increase the outflow when heavy runoff occurs. The capacity of the drain system is approximately 7.1 m3/s and is sufficient for all but the heaviest runoff situations. When this flow is exceeded, the lake level will rise to the 412.7 mMSL elevation and the excess flow will be discharged over the spillway from Lake 1. 1 i f-s V)
-COM005226: 154H 67 D
6
l 1 l I The flooded gate is under automatic control and opens stepwise to the full open position with a rise in water elevation in the lake system. The automatic i control has a manual override which permits the lowering of the lake level in ) anticipation of heavy runoff. The concrete block pumphouse with a poured slab roof is mounted at the top of the caisson. Two electric driven pumps are mounted within the pumphouse with the pump intakes set about 6.1 m below lake level. The pumps are normally cycled automatically so as to divide the workload with one pump in servicq and the other in standby although both pumps can be operated simultaneously, if desired. The pumps are manifolded into a single 20 cm Class-150 cast iron pipeline to the plant some 1525 m northwest of the pumphouse. The pipe complies with American Standards A-21.2, A-21.6, or A-21.8 as applicable and the mechanical joints (gasket and compression ring) comply with American Standard A-21.11. The pipeline is buried a minimum of 1.5 m below the surface. A.3.4.5 PROBABLE MAXIMUM SURGE AND SEICHE FLOODING This section is not applicable to the West Valley Si}e. A.3.4.6 PROBABLE MAXIMUM TSUNAMI FLOODING This section is not applicable to the West Valley Site. 9
-COM005226: 154H 68 p
,, -m. \- A.3.4.7 ICE FLOODING Flooding caused by ice jams.in Buttermilk Creek would not reach the plant site because prior to the water level increasing to the plant elevation, some 30 - 60 m above the creek, overflow across the eastern ridge line will occur.
The low current velocities in the lake system, even under overflow conditions in the spillway, would probably be insufficient to cause an ice jam in the spillway. Even in the unlikely event of an ice jam in the spillway, the local topography will prevent the water level from rising to the level where flooding of the plant site would occur. The spillway elevation is 412.7 mMSL and the plant site elevation is about 431 3 mMSL. A.3.4.8 WATER CANAIJ AND RESERVOIRS A.3.4.8.1 canals There are no canals at the WVDP; therefore, the section is not applicable. A.3.4.8.2 Reservoirs The design data for the WVDP reservoirs was presented in Section A.3.4.4. A.3.4.9 CHANNEL DIVERSIONS Because the WVDP Project facilities and reservoirs are located in the headwater regions of the Buttermilk Creek watershed channel, diversions or rerouting should not be of significant magnitude to affect water flow through the site. f tO V
-COM005226: 154H 69.
A.3.4.10 FLOODING PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS O As described in the previous section, the stream valleys surrounding the WVDP Project facilities are sufficiently steep and large enough to accommodate the respective M3Fs without flooding the plant site. Therefore, specific flood protection factors need not be factored into Project facilities and structures. The project reservoirs may fail under peak PMF conditions thereby disrupting the plant water supply. In such an event, temporary measures such as trucking in water and shutting down some facilities can be implemented until the dams and reservoirs can be repaired. There are no processes or facilities at the WVDP which would represent an immediate safety problem if the water supply was lost. A.3.4.11 LOW WATER STORAGE ANALYSIS The water supply is not safety related. As noted in A.3.4 3, no processes or facilities at the WVDP would present a problem if the water supply was lost. ll) Details on low water storage are therefore omitted. from this report. A.3.4.12 ENVIRONMENTAL ACCEPTANCE OF EFFLUENTS Project effluents discharged to surface waters must meet limits prescribed by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation for nonradiological parameters in a State Pollution Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) Permit and US DOE requirements for radiological parameters per US DOE Order 5480.1.
-COM005226: 154H 70
7 l- > l
\t (,
. . ] ),
i,, i f - p (. l: . ei ,
.O Such discharges <hre monitored by the Prbjectr to ensure that all standards are being met. Radiological liquid wastes are processed' through the lagoon system (
and low-level.vaste tpeatment facility prior to discharge. Such effluents can l be retained co-site for _up to several months to ensure that ,all parameters are within limits prior to release. / Analysis of accidental releases form the lagoons tts Erdman Brook was performed in the WVDP 6xisting facilities volume of the Project SAR. The impacts of such
-a release are estimated to be inconsequential as compared to natural background.
A.3.4.13 CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF ADJAClirr WATERCOURSES An aquatic ecciogical survey of the WVDP envirens is described in Supplement A.3 7-B. That section contains a description of the chemical biological composition of the waterways on and near the WVDP. O n O ,
-COM005226: 154H 71
b REFERENCES FOR SECTION A.3.4 Billelo, M., 1969. Relationships Between Climate and Regional Variations in Snow Cover Density in North America. USACRREL. Design of Small Dams, Second Edition,1973 U.S. ocpartmer t of Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Washingtor , D. C. Erie-Niagara Basin, Surface Water, Erie-Niagara Basin Regional Water Resources Planning Board Reports ENB-2,1968. By USGS and New York State Conservation Department Division of Water Resources. Hydrometeorological Report No. 33, J. T. Riedel, J. F. Appleby, and R. W. Schloemer, Hydrologic Services Division, U.S. Weather Bureau, Departmen: of Commerce, Washington, D. C. ,1956. /"N \~ Y Nuclear Fuel' Services, Inc.,1973 Safecy Analysis Report: NFS' Reprocessing Plant, West Valley,' New York, Docket Number 50-201. Nicholas, beorge W. and Eagan, Richard C.,1983 Position Paper: Meteorological Program for West Valley Demonstration Project. Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States, for durations from 30 minutes to 24 hours and return periods from 1 to 100 years, U.S. Weather Bureau, Technical Report 40, May 1961. U.S. DOE Order 5480.1, Environmental Protection, Safety and Health Protection Program for DOE Operations, bs- /
-COM005226: 154H 72
O TABIE A.3 4-1 BUTTERMILK AND CATTARAUGUS CREEK FLOW DATA BUTTERMILK CREEK FLOW DATA AT HAYS HOLLOW ROAD (Period 1961 - 1 % 8) Flw Parameter Flw (m3f3.e) Average Discharge 46.5 Maximta Discharge Rate 110.7 Minimum Discharge Rate 0.1 l l O CATTARAUGJS CREEK FLOW DATA AT G)MILNDA (Period 1940 - 1972) l l Flw Parameter Flw Average Discharge 20.1 i Maximtm Discharge Rate 979.2 Minimum Discharge Rate 1.5
-COM005200 :158H
--1.- ,- . , < - , , ~ , -
--, , --,----_-.,-.-,------r.--,.___,m,,w, - - , _ __.-,..-_-9-,,_-, , _ _
l i ) i i< l !0 I e i 1 l l 1 . f l l TABI2 A.3.4-2 i DAM PH15ICAL MARACTERISTICS l I Dan 1 Dam 2 Upstream Slope 1 Vertical in 2-1/2 Horizontal 1 on 2-1/2 O i- Downstream Slope 1 on 2 1 on 1-1/2
, Height 22.9 mMSL 15.2 mMSL s
O -COM005200:158H 4 w m m m-s oaurm _ _ _ , ..wY
4 O
- i s ,
f _M\ ' T (
" - )
}' !
Y, A s N U / ,._ d'- I <' ' I'
-+ .
( ~ ,m Em ,
~~' \ '
r~ ~ ~- , 9%p'R-r i ],1J, S~> ds --
/ /~
pss( cid BUTTERMil.K
- s ; -s enecx (Dy l % ! /
7 MWX VK MfW y 4 WF
't :
ALLEGHENY AlVER
]
O m u u i.3.4-1 WATE. COURSES WESTERN
~'
~ucm.o a % "cE~1E ,
10,000 a O ~ /\
- / N' / \
/ t / \ i
/ / i
' CATTARAUGUS (G0WANDA)
-/000 , ,
A f x (u A
' N
/
m x
\
x
/ i \ / \ \
' I \ / \ N- l g
W \ l g 5 \ \ i BU ILK) 4 '
/ \ /\ g g ' ' / \ ! , x i ,
u 7
\ / \ N g
' \x ' \ ex, O w E
I N
/
/
\ '
E I l\ E g l \ 3 BUTTERMILK l e k
=
U /0 A
- s v x N
l l
/
0 N O J f y p y , , , MON THS Of THE 1968 WATER YEAR ' O FIGURE A.3.4-2 i COMPARATIVE FLOWS OF SU TTERMsLM ANO CATTAMAUGUS CREEMS
I i
\
l \ Z$=--Qwg~ 7' - _- -m%.%--- % . . _ g' *m A - ,- - w A K, / y " ( W
= ~~' l -- -
n p( ~ : ; g. ,g ~ 1 l}ID%3y jfC ' Qs
-. , y Q. ,
Q; ) \\ -
'~~'" ' R;.
. &:y j .
lp
.S ,.,7 -. L -.
r.
,. - aThm.m,\
//
'}}gk e {> . , .
14 x,% J 1 - g~
,(t
- f. CS\ h,f -->
xx 3 x
'M[7 9.c/2W',,..~' =- .-. o ; .gpopy% =,g n.
-[
( .
- x. .
_,8e,).c , >c~.; . c=. h. ,y 3_-'- ,s
'.- -; 'V.'t Q,U
/ ) , ~c. ,
i .. -M S p
! - vf. p[
ps ,f \l~e4 M 0$,;ilJ.(o? _
%m, s s' 'p /
.. ya Ns ci ' ~ n v,- ,
' 8'
} r} )LV j' Q Qm:;
^
'g 3 r h;
x :w. . 6 . G. ' g% b j, gm' ,-lg%'.:.-
%y a(t V ..
u 2.e _.n . .y l t<(ro,.
' 1 'kil l,\un4
~
m j 9 ' s 41 3 \ w y m s
~
_ - g: ..:... ~r tw. ; ; ' _. , ~
\
jK . :.' - 3 , , 05 j [ O '
(
h PMi pS$% ?~ 1~_ o, a . - =. .. C =. :':; .
- 2. . -. -. - - .
R, W 3~:- i
~~ :": W;R I
- 7.* .. -
l' - l 1 _
1 y o 1 o . N, e , -- '.sss' (~~'CTT x -.\ .o <~T O' \' o 0
'~~'
' . e.g*
/
s ,. ['(O 1 4* ,,
/ *'
io a' **
'* g \ F
,4
..N-e 4 *) *%
'+-g. * " * ' * "
s &w[ w w- N' O'""'"'] 1 Q, g ,' w.), a - ,-
' " e i , ' n - \.
g .yS ( -' y
,h h<,,xlA , s
.s u e .
% _' _ _f-- gm s
- . )' ?-a '
s, . x1
. n. s y
N: . , d ' jag - s h '-Oh c , g
\
wQ ~ j _ ., sW
\
Y QQ s . u ~ ___, e s. . ,M, *a ' 0 h\i . ,~ e .. 2 7 .,... hC n y , . . ( :y
'.j ? , .
p -- ..
- . .- ... . . ?v . ,
-' ,p. ' '
/ ---
],'. ~,
f. sJQ,
?: '-)2,,, . .e , ~3 c Y' [ W -
f ' } Q'
', _ ,t, Q- (:.~[
~
's
~
y %{
~P '.m9x Au Mf t
t _ %, 5 y>.I . 1 J
,X -
[fUl1 1 mgf Tcf . '
~
.m
; ,'f ~
j $,
)1,
. . . - ~
mm -. ;. o o 3 z y p _..- y p[,4J3$ n ... > u..e %( s ,j e jT w- .;n ~. s
.... g c-. ,: m --
.. : -. ,g-
, ; ';_3 xs er k
~
- - i 4 4 _. I
- e -
4
, s e e j~x . .
s w n_ --
*Ngb .1
' o,. .-
-9 f?--.
n:_ __ #-.,wng i
~ \
--,mnw#, m%sw .y [
-(
.~ , x . .,
=----.+.,s >' 2
,7 : - e ,;
. s in. ,
.q .. . -
- a. . . c. " >
.;^
W g; y - - m ... . , ,L
- .~
a p" 9. u ; _ ; n.y ;A4;.,-:p* 3
, ~
. R f % 3% _ W'& ,& V-n b y
u
= G mG E
) STREAMS AnD D1TC11ES 2 p.. 1 DRAlninG T1-lE W /D FACILITIES AREA FIGURE A 3 4-3 _ 8507030441 'l3
l ( i w -
\ //~%... . . ., A -
, . ./ /*, - , ,/ - . . .
. , , .-, s
(- ..- e N
.s
(
/ .
/ . . ?, / n s
.g- ,
( ! } , (
~
( ..
~..._..
.s . m
.3 i d (A -
<? .
..'a. 1 es u .
se
.t lyI A .. F~xl .~ -
33 i \. i l m, i .' ~." , a - \. Ig_.a[. .
...: sg ( h
< 10 /
I, r :
- ?s .\
d y N rr - s ~- a -
, .f%
- 5': ..
,~ .
[-:E I m.- i
-4 '
n r, .
/'. . .
(
/ .
9 ./ f , $p-, ./ l
)
! (. s f 6 . 1 )l
)
- .'s- -s .. : s
) M. go $ ) / '#
n .
/w
.k #' l s, J
/- ' ' , , bw. '"sp-%
/ _. _ { w Y J
.s
,)l, y/ (
,% /
l H 4t- % - 3-
- o I '
*** $4,g t p f tstilE' '$'e4M v k ;l t'
* ~
s m. f
, ,f-.. O
+ .- .
. _.. /
( ".. ,,. N. , v. e - -
.."6
/,/ j ',.- j @
.. J g .
W , st lf , o, .
*' ' ~ ~N
,,s f bh ,
x, / I
?l_
a _J/ l. f
i: .. .~ .
..__..___.s ,
.. N .f / 7 e . 1 , a, ,,yi cred
'/--['.
. o +.
't,"
g
- w ; . ;,
e -
\
7-/y..-) ,,* T
. 9-& - ap
- i b} -
s
8 y 5/
,i I
, n. , ~ ,
\ g
,-l
/ -
) x ,
} _% /
Og O g wilf f M , j '\ . f
/ u e ,-
@f l,, *
{ // . _ ,q 'y,7\ y s' '
,s'. [ Nb . j!y '@I i ! N e '
(* f % ~ x'- j q , ,'
~
sJ fM 5
- s. ix .
N.~ ~ s x.. . N
;- e, , 6 s x x- - .
N ('f. n\t, f x
/.'9 N- l \. N h /,'
*\)
N I'
\ \ 14 'y -
/ x r/
.N i
T _ s Jx \ W+s,.
\ I s -
+
)
t
\ > n. -
i
\
l
/
s . , i . Ul, ,__ , \
.\
, t
. . .a
/
s-or I < AbA~vailalite On. 6 - - I \
, ,/ Aperture Card
/ s, '} c Y
- x
,I ye - /
/ TI I '
APERTURE ( \
> ,,, e cgg9
\ < . . ,- -
'\
*/
- o - . -
STREAMS DRAinihG THE
.5
*l'~ . , ,.98. " WESTERN DEW YORK DUCLEAR SERVICE CENTER n INCLUDING THE WEST VALLEY DEmonSTRATIOD PROJECT P
FIGURE A.3.4-4
=
2507030441 W
O, .s s M*% g
-s t
,r - s s., 's, *
.' T s, ,
/ \\ .'s-,t ,
I 4'N h..L...J t ~ AV \ ' ya s. W s
\)g.ss sh s
. \w c . . ..
/ " " "
..- c
\ g ' :';+ ,
s,
\
s ' \<449- *
<d<<;.
S. <,.g s* s .S#
\ *f ,$< ',' '
*g
\ \, 's,*.,+
. .i e /X s \/ ,
N '. / \ ~ ' g,%
\\ /' \s 'g # g s+
(=.'sNs =. ,., .
.. - M= s. .. . . . . .-.
\ '. \
\ 's. e. , i. .. I
' SAN'.
s, g ,. s. s s.
\ ,
Os ~ g N* s .s 's -
. N
's -
.: \, 's, y .= g
$s \ -
.m. , _
3 . .
$ \ . \s.s 3
, %s-s.
- N .
'\ s
'\.,
N s
\
\
Scast re trit 608 0 hot 800 304 O FIGURE A.3.4-5
- 1. AKE V ATER SUPPLY SYSTEM
e see
- f
/
^
/
k f o ! 1 i-i M
- /
en
.-s aoe se are aae me use a,e m a.e ma Aftsraar m perr, (ma /
FIGURE A.3.4-6 STORAGE CAPACITY VS. ELEYATION CURVE FOR DAM 1 RESERVOIR ....
r O - Y 350 J00 250
?
tu
/
8 3 u 200 t o e a h! 15 0
, /
l 10 0 x /
/
/
/
0 '
/3/5 1325 /333 /345 /355 /365 /3 75 ELEVATION IN FEE 7,(MSL)
FIGURE A.3.4-7 STORAGE CAPACITY YS. ELEVATION CURYC FOR DAt1 &Rt3tRY0lR
9 e 9 0 _ 0 2
/
O N IO S TM A VA EDS L R
. E Dl E0 S.N RY 8 VIB E 0
0 - YMS T 0 4 IOE 1 CCR 3 AR2 P A A O D C FEN E E A R G V U RUA R1 G I OC T F S 0 0 8 T E E F E R C 0 0 A O 6 Y T I C A . P A _ C E G A R O
+ 0 S T
0 4 0 0 2 O 0 0 ( o 0 0 _ 4 3 1 ' 1 _ =U%N ac2bw
A U D'S3r l l
- n. y .
u., . . . .,,
,i i; . s L .
e, L _ j _
/% ""
. i _.
-se= d 7 I
- '\
. I 'l &
.. f. . .f i
. *
- j ,' ' - * ' > * ;;
,;i*
g] r.
- t ,')*
.a ,- P., f r
i.t e -. i II i - !
.....w. 19, . .a l s1 4.'
ir ;- [s ~~
..s....8.f , .i M. - **" D _ s _n.a
. . _ . . _1Y, r,1: - .
... J. g,; n. !;T
.i
..n m
.. m
.: 1 4 i .
.=-- :. . .l :-=
;' .'. t. s N-
' he
- I
,e' rt i 29 ;
... . f-,r g u - N , . q, --
'l
- f. l, ,7 , (2 .g_ 'i"*
a',.. l l i 3a9 - f e.....
- g. . I g
I Is -. ;-
.. I g .
r .' i I . , d . )
,' ' 1 I ! t .
~.* I l 1 e
*je:
3
'f ... l l d'
...... . , g
, ,e .
........ u .
I xe, i jI w. i I, . if e i
.W i ! t J ,,
w { S ; j,1 . ,
, ,:. . ( ., ' . 1
- s. ; y
, 4 - -
,5 ,.
m
.. ,e pa
....f ,..
a
., a, .. .
T- 3r . 3 ..> W ,
+
,f'/;;Y.<
, ..,...e..,-n
,:. ,a . T.
p, .; Al i. s'14,1
. , :g
.e ...
. . , ".'. 9. . .'
a t . ,.
.e-t . . . , . .
'a"'** '
%l . ; 4 ,[, . : l
- s i a
. . . i FIGURE A.3.4-9 LAKE PUMP HOUSE
A b A.3.5 SUBSURFACE HYDROLOGY . A.3.5.1 REGIONAL AND AREA CHARACTERISTICS Four aquifers of interest underlie the WNYNSC. They are, from deepest to shallowests (1) the weathered zone between the till and the competent bedrock; (2) a thin layer of fine silty sand beneath the uppermost till (Lacustrine Layer); (3) the silty Lavery till; and (4) the alluvial fan sands and gravels. These are discussed belo 4 A.3 5.1.1 Weathered sedrock zone This zone is made up of a 0.5 metre thick layer of weathered and fractured shale resting on top of the consolidated bedrock at a depth of approximately 26 metres below the land surface in the vicinity of the NDA (US DOE, 1982). Bore hole data indicate that the uppermost layer of shale is usually fractured V and weathered sufficiently to permit the passage of usable quantities of water. This water-bearing zone is the largest and most reliable aquifer underlying the site. Water apparently enters the bedrock at higher elevations where the till cover is thin or absent and moves from the higher elevation downslope to points of discharge. None of the wells drilled at the WVDP that penetrate this unit have encountered water under artesian pressure. The production of a well drilled into this aquifer would be relatively low. Transmissivities of the aquifer are also low and have been estimated to be on the order of several litres per day (NFS, 1973). Most single home wells in the site area tap this zone as their primary water supply. Water samples taken from site wells tapping this water bearing zone in September 1982 (Dames and Moore,1982) indicate a potable water of good quality. Laborator-j analytical results of these samples are shown on Table A.3 5-1. O
-COM005269:155H 73
Little information is presently available on water in deeper formations. lh However, it is known from gas wells west and northwest of the site that two formations contain salt water at depths of 1,820 metres and 1,370 metres (NFS, 1973). Depths to water in this zone range between 27 and 37 metres below grade. Flow directions, determined from the two deep wells on the site, indicate that groundwater flow follows surface topography and is towards the east at an average gradient of 0.005 m/m. Plant operations do not withdraw water from this zone and there is no reason to believe that. groundwater flow directions will change or reverse themselves. This zone is not recharged within the plant area and site operations are not likely to influence or limit its future use. This unit does not outcrop within the controlled area of the plant. The nearest surface exposures are off plant property west of Rock Springs Road and to the northeast in the Buttermilk Creek stream channel. A.3 5.1.2 Lacustrine Layer A layered sequence of silt and clay locally grading upward into fine sand and silt up to six metres thick and capped with gravel has been encountered in sevoral bore holes. This unit has been informally called the " lacustrine layer" and is the second water-bearing zone at the site. This layer d' es not appear to occur uniformly throughout the WNYNSC subsurface (Albanese et al., 1983). In the vicinity of the burial ground it is typically found at depths of 20 to 25 metres below ths land surface (Prudic and Randall, 1977) and is underlain by a sequence of glacial till deposits and bedrock (LaFleur, 1979). O
-COM005269: 155H 74 1
O V This unit is only locally saturated and may be recharged by leakage from the overlying till (Prudic and Randall,1977). Water level data in the lacustrine layer suggest groundwater moves laterally (under a gradient of 0.023 m/m) to the northeast towards Buttermilk Creek (Prudic and Randall,1977; LaFleur, 1979). This layer is not used as a source of water by anyone in the area. Plant operations do not withdraw water from this layer and there is no reason to believe that groundwater flow directions will change or reverse themselves. As previously mentioned, this layer may be recharged by leakage from the overlying Lavery till. Because of its low yield and discontinuous nature, this layer has no future potential as a groundwater resource. The only plant operation which may influence it is leakage from the burial trenches. To date, no such leakage to the lacustrine layer has been confirmed. This layer does not outcrop within the controlled area of the plant. Its (} nearest surface exposure is to the northeast in the stream channel of Buttermilk Creek. Groundwater discharges in the form of local seeps have been documented to be occurring in this stream channel (Prudio and Randall,1977; LaFleur, 1979). A.3.5.1.3 Lavery Till The Lavery till, which comprises most of the unconsolidated sedimentary column at the site, is a glacially derived green gray, dense massive silty clay with some local, discontinuous, thin seams of sand and gravel. O
-COM005269: 155H 75 u.
The unit is not considered a true-aquifer. Pore spaces in the till are very lh small. Hydraulic conductivities average 10E-8 centimetres/sec. (Nuclear Fuel Services , 'Co. , Inc . 1973 ) . The porosity of the material is approximately 0.3, and the effective porosity (specific yield) is estimated to be on the order of 0.06. The predominant direction of groundwater movement is vertical, and no large differences between horizontal and vertical hydraulic conductivities have been reported (Prudic and Randall,1977; Albanese and others,1983). Because of its low yields and low permeability, the till is not suitable as a source of water by local users. At present, up to several litres of water per day are being withdrawn from the Lavery till from wells near the NDA. This is the only withdrawal of water from the till and will not greatly influence groundwater flow directions and gradients within the till. Recent field data (WVNS, 1984) suggests that permeability may be several orders of magnitude higher in the upper portion (upper three metres) of the till. It is in this zone that a network of intersecting horizontal and vertical fractures occur in weathered till horizons. Fractures and root tubes whose surfaces are bordered by firm oxidized till were recognizable to depths of 3 to 4.5 metres in cores from several test holes. Some vertical fractures did extend downward into the unweathered till. Flow directions in these fractures are difficult to predict, but it has been assumed that they will generally follow surface topography. As part of the continuing study of site geology, the United States Geological Survey and WVNS have installed a r. umber of piezometers around the periphery of the NDA. The data from these piezometers reveal a downward pressure gradient which is compatible with the notion of one dimensional downward groundwater flow through the unweathered Lavery Till. Likewise, the piezometric contours are virtually horizontal which suggests little if any horizontal flow component. The till is recharged locally via precipitation and meltwaters. Potential effects of the plant on this till are limited to leakage from the existing burial ground. 9
-COM005269: 155H 76
r f U A.3 5.1.4 Alluvial Fan This unit is comprised of gravels and silty sands with little to some silty clay (US DOE,1982). This unit forms an elevated plain which is locally referred to as the North Plateau area. The f an is approximately three to five secres thick and rests directly on the Lavery till (LaF.leur,1979). The plant area and high-level waste tank. complex are located in this unit. An isopach (Figure A.3 5.-1) of this . unit (Albanese and others,1983) indicates its areal extent and thickness. The f an pinches out several hundred feet north of the. burial ground, southeast of the plant area. This unit's groundwater is recharged by local precipitation and meltwaters. It yields water to small diameter monitoring wells at rates of 6.3 x 10-5 . 31.5 x 10-5 m 3/see and is not used for any local water supply purposes. This unit rests directly on the very impermeable Lavery till. Therefore, groundwaters in the alluvial fan material do not infiltrate into a regional
) groundwater table, but discharge locally along the fan's northern and eastern borders in the form of seeps and springs. Some discharge from this unit also supplies water to Erdman Brook.
Eighteen seepage f aces surrounding the North Plateau have been identified and monitored, generally during rare flow periods (Albanese and others,1983). The major seepage discharge point was the french drain system surrounding Lagoons 2 and 3 (as shown in Figure A.3 5-2). The highest concentration or seepage exists between the NP3 site and the french drain on the northeast side of the plateau. Groundwater flow gradients within this f an range from 0.0026 m/m to 0.0033 i with an average gradient of 0.00229 m/m. No water is withdrawn from this fan . for plant operations and groundwater flow directions are not expected to reverse thanselves under foreseeable conditions.
- i O
-COM005269: 155H 77
o A.3.5.1.5 croundwater users survey g In September 1982, Dames and Moore conducted an extensive survey of groundwater users within a 3.2 km radius of the WVNSC. The results of this survey are presented in Table A.3.5-2. The locations of these wells are shown in Figure A.3 5-3 This survey included a description of well specifications, well use, aquifer tapped, yield, etc. The majority of wells in the vicinity of the WVNSC are for domestic or farm use and tap the shale bedrock. Yields are relatively low (12.6 x 10 126.2 x 10-5 m 3 /sec) with depths ranging from 15-45 m. Several of these wells are used for monitoring purposes and none are within the zone of potential plant influence. A.3 5.2 SITE CHARACTERISTICS Data on groundwater levels, flow, permeability, porosity and gradients reported in the published literature were reviewed and are summarized in Table A.3 5-3 All water used at the plant, both for processing and domestic use, originates from two artificial reservoirs. These reservoirs are formed by two earthen dams which were constructed to carry the plant railroad spur across two draws (NFS,1974). The two lakes contain more than 555,525 m3 of water, (NFS, 1973). Groundwater is not used at the plant for process or drinking water supplies. Figure A.3 5-4 identifies the groundwater recharge areas within the influence of the plant. These areas are:
- 1. The North Plateau alluvial fan, and
- 2. The Lavery till.
Both are recharged by precipitation and meltwaters. The alluvial fan, because of its higher permeability, is recharged much more readily than the LaVery till. , S
-COM005269: 155H 78 L
^O t Because of the low permeabilities of the site sedir.ents, impacts of dewatering during construction activities will be limited to areas immediately proximate to the excavation. Water table contours are shown in Figure A.3 5.-5. This map indicates the predominant flow directions of the local groundwater regimes as is shown in Figure A.3 5-2. The locations of monitoring wells currently being sampled on a regular basis to evaluate possible outleakage from the plant are shown in Figure. A.3 5-6. A.3.5.3 CONTAMINANT TRANSPORT ANALYSIS Models for contaminant transport associated with each facility are contained in Chapter 9 of the SAR module for each facility. The hydrologic input parameters are based on the data presented in this chapter augmented, as required, for site specific data. The codes listed below are used to perform the contaminant transport analysis. The choice of code (s) is based on the type of release and the subsurface conditions of and around the release area. Code Reference Descr!ntion FEMWATER-1 Yeh, et al, 1980: Two dimensional finite element Yeh, 1983, groundwater flow model. LAYFLO Gureghian and One dimensional analytical Junsen 1983 radionuclide transport model with multilayer and decay chain capability. AT123D Yeh, 1981 One, two or three dimensional analytical radionuclide transport model. PRESTO-EPA EPA, 1984 Release, transport, and dose assessment model for low-level waste disposal facilities. FEMWASTE-1 Yeh, 19183 Two dimensional finite element mass transport through porous media model. The source terms for the models are also presented in the appropriate SAR module.
-COM005269 155H 79
Wherever possible the models are calibrated against existing environmental monitoring data. These data are contained in the environmental documentation for the Project. Pertinent segments of the monitoring data are summarized in the facility module of the SAR. O 9
-COM005269:155H 80
b U REFERENCES FOR SECTION A.3.5 Albanese, J. R. , Anderson, S. L. , and Weir, B. A. ,1983 Geologic and
' Hydrologic Research at the Western NY Nuclear Service Center, West Valley, New York: Annual Report, August 1981 - July 1982, US NRC Report NUREG/CR-3207.
Dames and Moore, 1982. Report on Groundwater Sampling, West Valley Demonstration Project, West Valley, New York. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), " PRESTO-EPA: A Low-Level Radioactive Waste Environmental Transport and Risk Assessment Code - Methodology and User's Manual," EPA 520/5-83-004, undated. Gureghian, A. B. and Jansen, G., 1983, "LA ?.0: A One-Dimensional Semianalytical Model for the Migration of a Three-Member Decay Chain in a Multilayered Geologic Medium," ONWI-466 Office of Nuclear Waste Isolation, () Battelle Memorial. Institute, Columuss, OH, May, 1983. LaFleur, Robert 0., 1979. Glacial Geology and Stratigraphy of Western i New York Nuclear Fuel Service Center and Vicinity, Cattarsugus and Erie Counties, New York. U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 79-989. Nuclear Fuel Services, Inc., 1973 Safety Analysis Report NFS' Reprocessing Plant, West Valley, New York, Dockec No. 50-201. Prudio, D. E. and Randall, A. D.,1977. Ground-water Hydrology and Subsurface Migration of Radioisotopes at a Low-Level Solid Radioactive Waste Disposal Site, West Valley, New York. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 77-566. U.S. Department of Energy,1982. Final Environmental Impact Statements Long-Term Management of Liquid High-Level Radioactive Wastes Stored at the Western New York Nuclear Service Center, West Valley. DOE /EIS-0081. O t
-COM005269: 155H 81
i l l l West Valley Nuclear Fuel Services, Inc.,1984. Report: Investigation of h Kerosene-Tributyl Phosphate Migration, NRC Licensed Disposal Area, Western New York Nuclear Service Center, West Valley, New York. West Valley Nuclear Service Center, West Valley, New York,1974. Supplement to Safety Analysis Report, NFS' Reprocessing Plant, West Valley, New York. Docket No. 50-201. Yen, G. T., 1981. " Analytical Transient One , Two , and Three-Dimensional Simulation of Waste Transport in an Aquifer System." ORNL-5602, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 1981. Yeh, G. T , 1983, "FEMWATER-1: A Finite Element Model of Water Flow Through Saturated-Unsaturated Porous Media - First Revision," Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 1983 Yeh, G. T., 1983, "FEMWASTE-1: A Finite Element Model of Waste Transport Through Saturated-Unsaturated Porous Media - First Revision," Oak Ridge . National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 1983 9
-COM005269: 155H 82
O TABIA A.3 5-1 MATER WALITY RESULTS LEATHERED BEDROCK ZGIE SANIES TAMEN 9/82 Well No. Well No. EPAmes Perimeter CT272 76 USS W-2 Standard pH8 8.2 8.8 6.5-8.5 Specific Cond.** 3 41 273 Sodium 61 44 50 Calcium 14 60 150 Magnesium 3.0 11.0 125 Sulfate 5.0 2.5 25 Chloride 14 3 5.8 250
- Standard Units
** umhos/ centimeters at 25 degrees centigrade
*** 40 CFR Part 265.91 O -COM005200:158H
-- - - - - --- -- -. . -. . - - . .. -. - -.= . ~ .
i TABLE A.3.5-2: LOCAL WATER WELL INVENTORY FORM (1 of 10) appres. Interval s.aae Ser.e.e4 State Sa fece Well Total or Protehle 50. ef Type W ater Date of we!! Location and Eles. Well and We!! Depth Interval Agulfar People of Level steasee- Commentas so. Owner a w ass (ft; u se* Type Diameter (ft) (ft) Tapped Served Pump (ft) meat Water Quality, etc. 6* 100 cattles alternative 3 Seed. Dawla Thomas Ceraers Ed. 4130 D.a Dug 18' IT j' Gravel 4 Sub Floutng 9/02 sources of water 300 cattles alternatt we 2 Seed. Sawt3 Thomas Careers 84. 3)00 9.4 Sprang 4 9/82 sources p water Supplies a small tree 3 hatson. Each Some R3. 1295 D.4 Spring ) S.W. Floutng 9/82 nursery used by Schtchte! Naseryg 4 materstras Taenas careers 44. -1330 D4 Dug 36* 12 Sand 0 Piston 9/82 a large tree Tars to-5 Waterstram Tmanas careers ad. -1330 e anger 4* 32 --- Sand 2 Piston 9/82 Well Piston 6 n.Lff, S Tnamas Carners R4. 1330 D Palat 2* 82 4' Sand 3 or Jet 9/02 Bever runs dry ceeent block T datate tez C. Bone Rd. 9350 O Sprang holaans basta 5 S.W. Flouang 9/82 36' I ateel S.W. 8 kannse 6ez. C. Bond 44. 3280 D Dug tune 48 Sand 2 Jet 8.0 9/82 36* I .oacr.t. S.W. 9 Clare. R. tona Rd. 3350 D Dug tube 15 Sand 4 Jet 4.0 9/42 very quacu recovery i 33 huma. F. bons ed. 3 3t 0 0 Dug 24* ta te 20 Sand 5 S.W. 17.0 9/82 I l i catea 12. neice . e or l Lans 80 cattle. Board of 30* a T' eeep Sun.* Wealth chemical analysts, It taas Meat Co. Some 84. 1250 D.S.C Sprang fiberstass taan 5 S.W. 3.0 9/82 every 6 months 12 felle . W11eer Bond Rd.
- St 240 4310 D.S Del 6* 853 Shale 2 Sub. 20.25 9/82 7-15 cattle I
j 83 G415e". atace Rt. 240 3J00 0 Dr1 6* 160 30' $* Shale 2 $ab 17'7" 9/82 Test yields t gga l l 1.h l ss . eats, assmere 4t. 24 le> u Dq 16* IS Cra vel 0 --- 5.0 9/82 . Gravlip In 7/73, spring was dry t$ tease .istlaw Jr. St. 2k1 92 % D Spring fe4 Flo.thg 9/82 for tua months le Malle Steerta Deeen Tree RJ. 3)00 t Dri 6* toS 3 Snane 0 Suo 92.6e 9/82 83 . e.moste s 3 - steen; " . commercsal; 1. tacustrial; a . agrn culturals P - putt ac supply Ge u:MLse 3.
-a404%'C8 s tMsf
_ _ __ , _ ~- . . - . _ . . . - . - ~. - . -_
5
- I e k' "
. . (,v
~ s',)
t: g. g: j 5
=
.n, : !
g a' 8
=
g 2 4 9.~. 5 1, 18 : - E-
- := c2 88 .
*=
- 23 ~-- . 5 ": '
* *2 3 6-. . O 3
' .8 s'- 3= . & :: ;-
- 1"1 1 se,gj 1'-
- g*"l 8. a b I" 3'
- - : ,, 822- . 5 2
, ,e 3.
3 33 s
-t
- : ga .-:
. :=
- . , i :=
- s : 3 -
a 4
- . i82b. l - li~ ,,4..-
.I .s. --. .
.k*. - s .h. t. .~. k- o3 3 St o. a I -
6 4 t
- g 2 a
i l a a 2 2 2 aaa a 4 4
- gIO 3s
- 'm o
c
, .n = 3 ~ C 5 ? 4 8. f
. o
~
i I, ha
; w 1 g ={
a i i .3 I d. i 4. :: . . .x .
; o A W W A a a 44 g w; a a4 4: a N
- Til 3
3: g - a e a a o.o . . m
- c o o m m 8's k C
i > 2h
- b
- o i
g 2:1 j&t-2 j j 2 1 2, 2 3,
.I,
,4, .a, 2
.J,
' w -, - d 3* i tl En y y 3 a . . A .3.5 i 4 aa
$ = , a" .
- ts: . .-- o - .
g sjt . 2 - 2 6 2* 3* 3 i 1] 2 l I - gs . 1 a t
.t* .-
L 83 L LLk
] L
~
a i ~ ., 4. 4 2 a a: - I J' N O,1 F i, F F i, & F {a y j y F
.i, _aa . . 'l
- 4
-
- a . a . ., a a 2 a a; n =1 o a o o d e a a a o a 4 In a e a a 3 ,
L
)]e)g:e e
2 a e a a a a a
- a
- a.
ae:
- : s
. 2 a a i : : : : i j,;I i I-8 A A
- a
- j a- a;aAe:
4 a A a,g 2 , II i a ~ ~ ~ ~ i 4
}.8I I s e !
1 i ! !}4g 31 a 1 e 1 e 1ii i di l.o 8 I 2 l : a;; N 5 5 d 5 "
". 3 aa J E u
g .i I ii- - 2 3 _1 3 i _i _i 4 h i
- i Il a31, 3
1 3
# 34 t
E 2 2 - ai a222 3 i e - Ill 2
-a .. I 2 4 4 C4 C 2 4 2 C R A M : a. s B.
"8a >
(. ~
~
( ( v TABLE A.3.5-2: IACAL WATER WELL INVENTORY FORM (3'of 10) appres. Interval Land Sereened 3tatie Seeface Weta Total or Probable No. of Type Water Date of West Locattaa and Etee. Welt and Well Depth Inter al aquirer People of Level fleasere- Comments: sa. Queer aadress (ft) Use* Type D8 mater (ft) (ft) Tapped Served Pump (ft) aset Water Quality, etc. Tested yield. 4 ppa unable to measire a.w.1. well used 33 an.ffas. G. Thomas Careers . I380 D Dr! 6* 105 75 Shale 8 by usuttrk. D.. next door 24* Piston - steet Sand and or Sof t water, no supply 3s team, coorde mond ad. 134s D Dug teae 12 , Gra nt 4 matary probleme Driven Welt 12 cattle, eannot to 36 Emerson, a. Ymanas Carners 1360 a.a rotat i 3/4* 22 4 Sand 7 notary peped dry Dug We!! tapped into a *apring* Tile 4.0 -never dries up. Fanular - 37 Emersas. Ed T* = = Careers 24. 4335 0 Lined 24* 47 Sand 2 Sump assumed 9/82 mand. little clay Dug and flot usee-water "too hard" 34 taerson. Ed Tmmas Carners ad. 3360 0 Drtales 3' 40 - Sand 0 --- - dries up la wtater 24* steel Site Itated as swamps ca 39 Teesuases. J. Emerson 84 9330 D Dug tune 32 --- Sand 2 quad 24* steel Site listed as swampe on a3 S mas. W. Emerzan 84 1330 D Dug tune 12 --- Sand 2 quad 24*
- stee! Site 14sted as swampe on et Cepnart, ass. Emers>a ed. 8340 D Dug tune 92 ---
Sand 2 quad 42 stargan. F. St. 240 43 treams,ee. St. 240 I nt ) D Drt 6*, -300 e Shale 3 Sump 4* a 93' 14' of water in tutae steet 90- (F. Bond 9/82) 44 DW, F. Cole 34. 8440 D Det case 105 77-92 Shale 2 Jet 8 spa recovery
-400 Tested yield estimate set 45 offertech, J. Catp Re. 1465 D Det 6* s2 -50 Shale 6 Jet 24.75* 9/82 at 400 spri (oemer)
Salt accumulates in water at 3teaman. J. Cole ad. v4e5 D Det 6" 62 Shale t Jet water after a heavy rain 47 Less W . 8 Cete Rd. 44fC D Drl 6* Shale 2 Pastoe
- D = amestae; S - stacas C - commercsas; I anamtrial; a - agrtcotteral; P = puttle supply; 5 = artwee2.
h ",8atS$u
_ _ _.__--.. ~ -_ __ () _- ~K v V {b TABLE A.3.5-2: LOCAL WATER WELL INVENTORY FORM (4 of 10) Appros. Interval . Land Screened 'Statio Surface Well Total or Probable No. of Type Water Date of m!! ' Location and Elev. Well and Well Depth Interval Aquifer People of Level Meheure- Commentat No. Owner Addres s (ft) U ses Type Diameter (ft) . (ft) Tapped Ser ved Piano (ft) ment Water Quality, ete.' . 60* Llated depth may be easing 48 E vens Cole Rd. 1460 D - Drl 6' 65 Shale 5 Jet 30.5 9/82 length, not meil depth 49 Wilson, D. Cole Rd. 1460 D Dr1 6' 60 Shale 3 Jet 50 Kendall. R. Cole Rd. 1460 D Dr1 6' 40 3 Sep Spring Gravity 4'sil's7' fed T!!e ficwing 51 seischer, K. Cole Rd. 1550 0 Cistern 3 spring Sta Rendell, W. ColeRd. 1550 D Spring 3 51 cattle Spring
. Supplies Both gravity 52 Rendell. R. Cole Rd. 1530 0 Homes 4 fed 52a Hende11. K. Cole Rd. 1530 0 Drl 4 Tested yield 4 or 5 .sm 30- (1974) Ouners field le 53 Emerson, L. ColeRd. 1480 D Dr! 6' 40 Shale 4 Sub higher than 4-5 spa 54 Codd, R. Rt. 240 1460 D Dr! 6* 100 65 Shale 2 Sub 41.0 9/82 Tested yields 18 spa 55 Rogers G. ht. 240 1460 0 Dr1 6' 32 12 Shale 5 S.W. Tested yields t o spa 56 Boberg, D. Rt. 240 1450 0 Del 6* -40 5 Sub -20 1978 Tested yld: 13 sph (owner) 57 Codd, J. Bond Rd. 6325 D Dug 24" 12 , Sand 2 200' E of house Tested ylenda 75 spa well pissped all day with no 58 Dobles, J. Rt. 240 1440 D Dr1 6' 80 $ Shale 5 Jet 25 1952 eavdown .
3.000 chickens 3 ownerg 24 hrs pumping at 25 gpa 59 Heinen. F. At. 240 1440 D.S Dr1 6' 100 60 Shale 10 J et 70' 1%9 did not lower the W.L. 60 Smith, G. Rt. 240 la90 U Dr! 6' 73 8 Shale 3 Sub 50.5 11/61 From LaScala.1968 Nelson, R. Gravity 61 Pond No. 3 Rt. 240 1530 D.A,$ Spring fed 60 cattle, never dried up 61a Wilson St. 240 eD = domestic; S
- stocks C = consercial; I . inJustrial; A = agriculturdla P
- public supplyi U = unused.
-COM00Vol :158!t
-s' .,- s
.fs) v (v)-
TABLE A.3.5-2: LOCAL WATER WELL INVENTORY FORM (5 of 10) Appros. Int erval Land Screened Statte Surface Well Tot al - or Probable Bo. of Ty pe Water Date of Well Location and Elev. We!! ane We!! Depth int erval Aquifer People of Level Meas ur e- Comments: No. Owner A ddress (ft) Usee Type Diamet er (ft) (ft) Tapped Served Pump (ft) ment - Water Quality, etc. 62 Croakaan, H. Rt. 240 1440 D Dr1 6* 1 29 9 Shale 8 Jet 27.33 9/82 ForCa rich 63 Nelson. R. St. 240 D Dr1 6* 425 Shale 7 Jet 25 1952 Well used in past to supply 64 2ef ers. D. St. 240 1440 D Dr! 6* 155 Shale 3 Sub 20 1972 5.000 chickens 60 cattle 65 Zefers, D. At. 240 1450 D Dr! 6* 160 Shale 4 S.W. (20 --- 66 Wagner. R. Rt. 240 1460 D Spring 3 Jet 120- *Will overfler af not 67 Zefers M. Rt. 240 -1500 D Dr! 6* 130 130 Shale 2 Sub o pumped 74 cattles tested yield 12-14 Spas would Itke watec 68 Itamerman Rt. 240 1510 D.S Dr1 6* 93 $ Shale 4 Sun 12 1956 sampled 69 Kester. H. Rt. 240 1490 D Dr1 6* 165 Shale 6 Jet --- --- Unable to sample W.V. 70 Conservation Club Rt. 240 71 Goggtn. J. St. 240 1500 D Dr1 6* 173 43-53 Shale 3 Sun 47' lla 9/82 72 Zamalski, W. Twitchell Rd. 1520 0 Dr! 6* 28 cat'tes tested yield 7 spaa *esce!!ent recovery-Rt. 240 overnight the well wt!! 73 Steffenhagen. P. Green Rd. 1580 D,5 Dr! 6* 105 Shale 6 Jet a overflow if not pumped 74 Lara. 1. Rt. 240
- 92- Spring 75 Schumacher, G. Rt. 240 1535 D Dr1 6" 96 Shale 4 Jet 66 '73 Can be pumped dry Gravity flowi ng 76 Ebel . D. Twitchell Rd. 1570 D.S Spring 3 fed s pring 9 cattle .
27 cattle. 3 p6 es 77 Heary. T. Heinz hd. 1570 0 Dr! 6* 92.4 Shale 3 Jet SS.4 4/28/62 1-LaScala, 196 S 7S Heary. T. Heinz Rd. 1540 D Spri ng 3 20.0 9/92 6 horses 79 Case Rt. 240 15SO D Dr1 6* 125
- D = domestics S stocks C . commercs als ! = andustrials 4 agraculturals P = pubite supply U = unused.
-COM00520tstS8N
4 s ,3 - . (m)i (J' TABLE A,3.5-2: LOCAL WATER WELL INVE_NTORY FORM (6 of 10) Appros. . Interval Land
- Screenes Statt o Surface Well Total or Proba ble No. of Ty pe W at er Date of i Ee!! Location and Elev. Well and Well Depth Int erval Aquif er People of Level Meas ure- Commente No. Owner Address (ft) U see Type Diameter (ft) (ft) Tapped Ser ved Pump (ft) ment Water Quality, etc.
Welt asider porch, Snacces-si ble. New owner has Day, E. 3 mantoal knowledge of well 80 (Fuller) At. 240 1550 D Dr! 6* 78 81 Heary, S. Rt. 240 82 Jones, H. Rt. 240 1450 D Dr1 10' 60 Shale 4 Sub . 32 9/82 Tested yields 4 sps
= Piston l 83 Latona, J. J. Rt. 240 1560 Dr1 8' 90 2 or jet 10.25 9/82 300 gallon recovery in one
- 84 Fitntjer, G. Butterallk Rd. 1520 D Spring 3 S.W. day 85 Finntjer, G. Butteratik do. 1420 D Dr1 8* 110 70 Shale 2 Sub 63 1971 Tested yield 16.64 spm 86 Filntjer, G. Buttermilk Rd. 1520 U Spring e 87 Spittler, F. Fos Valley Rd. 1415 D.S Dr1 6" 3 S.W. 25 cattle, uncooperative 88 Swartz, M. Foz Valley Rd. , 1410 D Dr1 6' Uncooperati ve 89 Town of Ashford Fox Valley Rd. 1450 1 Dr! 6' 325 Shale Sub Spring. 60 cattle, sub. pump 90 Widrig, W. Foz Valley Rd. 1450 DS Drl (* 300 Shale 8 Sub 75.0 '82 at 170' O.G.
S.W. 91 Skinner, W. Dutch Hi!! Rd. 1890 0 Spring 2 Jet B.O.H. 48' wooden Spring 92 Mullen Rock Springs 1840 U Dug bos s fed l 91 Mullen Rock Springs 1840 D Dr! 6' =100 *70 Shale 3 Jet 0 9/82 At one time, fed 100 cows 4 j 94 Golls Senumacher Rock Springs u Spring 95 Haur i, D. Rock Springs D.S Spr6pg e Jet A g.)od supply 96 Lee, Wo. Dutch Nit! 1990 D Dr! 6" -90 Shale 7 Suo 41.66' 9/82 { Cover over well dif f acult Sitty to a)ve w/o dist urbing con-97 Lloyd Dutch Hill 1845 D Dug 36* 15 Sand 5 S.W. struction of we!!
'D = domestlet S = stock; C = commercials I = industrials 4 = agriculturals P = pubite supply U = unuseJ. -COM005205 :158N
f% ,O r
% d' .
TABLE A.3.5-2: LOCAL WATER WELL INVENTORY FORM (7 of 10) Approg. Interval Land Screened Static Surface Well Total or Probable No. of Type Water Date of tien t Location and Elev. Welt and Well Depth interval Aquifer People of Level Measure . Comments: No. Owner - Address (ft) Uses Type Diameter (ft) (ft) Tapped Served Ptap (ft) ment Water Quality, etc. 98 W11koss, F. Dutch Hill 1840 D.S Det 6* 100 (60 Shale 7 Jet 25' 7" 9/82 6 settle 99 Hyers. D. Dutch Hill 100 Turner. B. Dutch H111 1790 D Dr! 6' 100 20 4 Jet 6 (est.) 9/82
- Sedrock 5.3* a.G.
101 Rachio G. Dutch Hill 1800 0 Dug 24' 5.3 T Till 2. 8 . 4/62 acmrding to LaScala 60-70 102 Rachte. G. Dutch H111 1750 D.S Drl 6' '80 open Shale 3 Jet 6 cattles cannot run dry 103 Serto J. Dutch Hill 1780 U Used by two tenanta, one nel@bor owner around 804 Guisento J. Dutch Hill 1780 0 3 Smdays only 6 pigs - tested yields 3 spo. 6' column of water 105 Hughes. S. Dutch Hi!! 1710 D.S Dr! 8' 76 e Shale 1 Sub in well Unable to locate well in 106 Warzel. E. Boberg Ad. 1580 D Dr1 6' 70 l fleid 150' E of house 107 Shimmel. H. Boberg ad. 1580 D Dr1 6" 83 5 Jet Over-flows coneete the pipe va ult S.W. from the 108 Sarver R. Boberg Rd. -1600 D.S Spring 4'a4'z6' 2 Jet vaul t 5 cattle 109 Harshbarger Boberg RJ. 5550 D Dr! 6' 86 --* --- 2 Sub 100 Mumbach Boberg Rd. 1550 D Drl 6* 50 ~~~ 2 Summer III Kramer. E. Boberg 44, 1550 0 Dr! 6* 135 Snale 4 Sub (10 1980 Tested yieldr 26 spa (f) 100 cattle,. tested ylete: Il2 Cono. L. Dutch Hill Rd. 1560 D.A.S Dr1 6* 60 40 Shane 1 Jet -85 1982 33.3 spe Can be pumped dry in 113 Cobo. D. Dutch H t11 ha. 1560 D Dra 6* 40 25 Shale 3 Jet -12 1982 85 minutes 114 Ph!!!tps. G. Duten Hill Ad. 1595 D Drl 8' 50 4 Sut. 7.33 9/82 Tied unth church neat JJur eD = domestles S = stocks C . commercial g Ie inJustrials A = agriculturali P
- public supply U = unuse3.
- COM00*>J01 : 15bH
t Ij k-: i - ( . .
)Ns = 1 qi I
s 1 8 k9
.g lls,). /: .;
, 3 a ;l i
3 , aa . < l
. t ,,, -
x . j o ng: l- i
. pt :V -
' I, ll l .
f.c .S i hf -
.,,Iff,"
'[. " ,^f., 3,i,-. .
// D#
, Ipk A.. \ k,.9 j_. CO$
(.[. wl f .
,. s -
..-= - -
4 73 I.
). !t ;, 9 i l3 N!. .
4 k- bi-n'{y'iyj b !p N, } x TD,h,j}I!~ Is ], a
- - i; ...; - -
rh .
; =
$ nw(jl; yL ;, ~ ,;ij ,, 11 8) .
a
-2 - 3r j . . :', a 9 . ; , ,
- 1 $ g J -
2- h ' - j ki. i g d d 3 l y -)l ; g - j- _,
.c l sg m - -
.,q , { !g . g.
-9. I . a--: .=-
11 %', e
- 1 - -
; "' 3
" 19
. Ifgi; rJ m; y .!.,
t: ' . . .I m' lx;.q'=f - w! h p.. g
,} .I =E' J;
o--t '.- 3'. g g,i p- ,=< 1
}I ,!% jI'3I
- o--M o N.', ew s .x 4-Lif
-j l} o__
*~*
[f ,, e-- e
!. a -
; w .= -
~: r( !!l sE f}
3
= ,
3 g3 5 gg g ,: yggN '
' g. , n l} $
lj '.s ~,
;* ~ ' + Q'T-j;_ .
sy 3 j(IJJ'l;g-.h!N- i y g ' . ..- e .
- en. ~
=.
. i : u ,, q .
p[
~
y ..i -f,. I.
,j f .
If .,) lg - } ' ij a ~ ' 5 l sg
.,= 0 E ] : As 1
- e *j - '
[;3;
=
, n
- , a 2
yj-! i b - aq=, fi ,il b'=l ~l)ll% p, ! c!.G' ] +jf g lp < ia gfi r= . i. p xx s< i e s-
..A.
*kb I ,[ L j g) h ._.
n, - I
' *- =- 2
,9 k ~I f i,
~
li
.f, j
(f I # }; d ,o . .[/-7 5 lk.,',, , f(if $ }'ij;jjj l ,; t[i I
./ / ,, 3
\
=, YJ b j, ,j u ,I I II Y c
's. 3, JI c, - p 4.
.; -a
,l. j , _ J {.,. (),1
.. e YD FIGURE A.3.1-1 -
. _ .}}