ML20128B560
| ML20128B560 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle  |
| Issue date: | 11/24/1992 |
| From: | Pederson C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Reed C COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20128B563 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9212040020 | |
| Download: ML20128B560 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000373/1992026
Text
_.
.
_.
.
,
Oc0
.
v
NOV 2 41992
Docket No. 50-373
Docket No. 50-374
j
Commonwealth Edison Company
ATTN:
Mr. Cordell Reed
Senior Vice President
Opus West III
1400 Opus Place
Downers Grove, IL 60515
Dear Mr. Reed:
SUBJECT:
ROUTINE RADIATION PROTECTION INSPECTION AT LASALLE COUNTY STATION
ON NOVEMBER 2 THROUGH 6, 1992
This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Mr. P. L. Louden of
this office on November 2 through 6, 1992. The inspection included a review
of authorized activities for your LaSalle facility. At the conclusion of the
inspection, the findings were discussed with those members of your staff
identified in the enclosed report.
Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the report. Within
these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective examination of procedures
and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observation of
activities in progress.
Based on the r6sults of this inspection, certain of your activities appeared
to be in violation of NRC requirements, as specified in the enclosed Notice of
Violation (Notice).
The violation-is of' concern because of apparent
inattentiveness of radiation workers to be cognizant of Radiation Work Permit
requirements and limitations.
You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions
specified in the enclosed Notice when preparing your response.
In your
response, you should document the-specific actions taken and any additional
actions you plan to prevent recurrence. After reviewing your response to this
Notice, including your proposed corrective actions and the results of future
,
l
inspections, the NRC will determine whether further NRC enforecment action is
necessary to ensure compliance with NRC regulatory requirements.
l
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of
l
this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed
in the NRC Public Document Room.
The response directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice are not
subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
9212040020 921124
ADOCK 05000373
G
g g\\,
l
)i
.
<
.
i
Commonwealth Edison Company
2
MOV 2 41992
-
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,'
"Odgina! 3pcf by cynte D. h&n:n"
Cynthia D. Pederson, Chief
Reactor Support Programs Branch
Enclosures:
1.
2.
Inspection Report
No, 50-373/92026(DRSS);
No. 50-374/92026(DRSS)
cc w/ enclosures:
D. Galle, Vice President - BWR
Operations
T. Kovach, Nuclear Licensing
Manager
G. J. Diederich, Station
Manager
DCD/DCB (RIDS)
OC/LFDCB
Resident Inspectors LaSalle,
Dresden, Quad Cities
Richard Hubbard
J. W. McCaffrey, Chief, Public
Utilities Division
Licensing Project Manager, NRR
Robert Newmann, Office of Public
Counsel, State of Illinois Center
State Liaison Officer
RI}II}'?
UkS
-fl-
RI I ()
RIII
f
L'auden/jp
Snell
c. . ay e
P 'grson
11lfj92
plplpu
t//?3/9u
\\\\ Q