ML20127P217

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Review & Concurrence on Installation of Temporary Drain Line Plug in HN-100S Cask.Sketch Which Details Proposed Configuration & Rev 7 to Procedure HNDC-0-001-1, Cask Handling Procedure..., Encl.Fee Paid
ML20127P217
Person / Time
Site: 07109089
Issue date: 05/02/1985
From: Leduc R
WESTINGHOUSE HITTMAN NUCLEAR, INC.
To: Macdonald C
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
Shared Package
ML20127P224 List:
References
25204, WHNI-E-816, NUDOCS 8505230724
Download: ML20127P217 (3)


Text

.

-~

O 7/--fdh o

N x

y g

(\\ =

o Decem fb b

MNt 1985 >

10 nuss Westinghouse AWeshn@ouse 9.

Mart SEcDO.1 9151 Rumsey fbad N

Hittman Nuclear

  • di"Y W

D Cmetax f,

cobmte. uaryiano 2104s. hRM3 lq

/,

000 964 5036 DOCKETED REFER TO:. WHNI-E-81 8/

usNRC 2

gg i4 Y385 + --

sEcuoM y 2,1985 g

cocKET CLERK 8

g

' Cri e N

e vi-

.Mr. Charles MacDonald, Chief 55;

.. Transportation' Certification Branch 7'

U.S.' Nuclear Regulatory Commission u

Washington, D.C.

-20555 g;

o'

SUBJECT:

. Certification of Westinghouse Hittman Nuclear Incorporated J. 4 HN-100S Shipping Package

REFERENCE:

Hittman Amendment Submittal, Letter No. WHNI-E-812, Dated April 19, 1985

Dear Mr. MacDonald:

. Pursuant to a discussion today with Mr. R. Odegaarden, Hittman hereby re-quests your review and concurrence of -the installation of a temporary drain line plug-in the subject cask. A sketch is attached which. details the proposed con-

' figuration.

As explained to Mr. Odegaarden, Hittman found this change to be necessary

. hen,_during' cask maintenance, it was discovered that the cask drain line cou-w pling and screwed plus could not be replaced-in-kind once removed from the cask.

Hittman has since made the above-referenced submittal to detail an alternative, permanent drain line configuration change.

W

_ e request your approval of the plugged configuration for an interim period of three months, during which time arrangements can be made for the permanent change.

We believe there are no safety implications related to the temporary plugging of the drain line. None of the analyses in the Safety Analysis Report are im-pacted.- The drain line is an optional feature of the cask (reference cert.

drawing C001-5-9128),.hence mentions or the drain line in the SAR may be construed as not applicable in the~ case of this unit. Hittman has revised the cask hand-

' ling procedure (see enclosed)' to emphasize to users the optional status of the drain line.. During the scheduled maintenance, the cask successfully passed the j.

- annual leak test (it was tested through the drain line hole before plugging).

.~/2M b'-/

I. D bh ~ D N d g 90;0U E' #

I

+,gmy

~

M2"' E li 89? &

r/d%,%m T. ',

/

C PDR l-

}Q0

! Ade Gmh&7u asAs/rF

e

').-

' Letter to Mr. MacDonald

'May 2, 1985

-Page 2 As discussed with Mr. Odegaarden, we would prefer that this temporary change not become part of the certificate drawing references but defer to you

.on the mechanics of its review and approval. A check for $150 is enclosed to cover application fees. Your expeditious review of this request will enable us to continue to use this cask and-would.be much appreciated.

Very truly yours, m

R. J. Leduc Director of Engineering RJL/jik Enclosures i

I l

I

. Ul.

%c i:

77 b-N c

a D*

h l

-j O'

t

u:

.,% e W

9

. Weitinghouse Hittman Nuclear incorporated CALCULATION SHEET

,.,E jf cal.C. NO 1l" #

O IGINATOP b-DATE CHECKED DATE PR,OJ. ECT DM f 665 JOB NO.

SuiYECT fA1AL.'# 68b56 laFLI M '*5-SHEET N O.

i i

i i

\\ l-l

, K!

(

1-l 2

'~

I

, '~

r.

3 l

i t

I 1.

3

.L it

- --- 46

'N it

.i g.

13

^

k \\.k

(

~

T

\\ \\\\/\\

\\

\\

I 0Att. STOC.lf-

//

Z /g"p (3%ooops' yibN5n.

3 i

1-sz... p u o... )

3a P/

3 2,

22

~

f.

33 24

" ~ ~ ' '

23

-'-""{***

u

' ' - ~ ~ ~ ~ '

'~,

27

['

y n

S E c.r to o n -M "

29 ptycqgo bttril4 L,luE

~~

j H M 1005

{

31 l

3,

[.

EEF. Coo l 917.8 33 i

Fla. l 4

3.

ik l

H NDC-E-204-4 m <r n e.

-