ML20127P129
ML20127P129 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Issue date: | 11/23/1992 |
From: | Serpan C NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH (RES) |
To: | Shao L NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH (RES) |
Shared Package | |
ML20127P132 | List: |
References | |
NUDOCS 9212020087 | |
Download: ML20127P129 (6) | |
Text
. . . . .
B
- UNIT E D STAT E0 *
/* NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l o NOTE 10: L. C. Shao, Director Division of Engineering -
Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research FROM: C. Z. Serpan, Jr. , Chief Materials Engineering Branch Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research SUBJECl: PD1 INf0RMA110N MEETit4G NOVEMBER fi, 1992 On November 6,1992, the Performance Demonstration initiation (PDI) organization provided an overview presentation on the status, activities and f plans of actions underway to establish performance demonstration samples, 4 facilities and protocols, etc. for inspection of nuclear components. A brief summary of speakers, subjects and topic details is provided in the enclosure, plus attendance and the PDI handout.
Much discussion was held at the end of the meeting concerning scheduling for start of performance demonstrations for qualification of inspectors, relative to the needs of specific utilities that are being faced with inspection needs during the 1993-1995 time frame. This clearly impacts the issue of when NRC will require implementation of Appendix VIII.
Actions for NRC, resulting from the meeting are:
Decide if NRC must review and approve PDl's procedures or simply take industry's certification of compliance
- with ASME requirements _
- Decide on Appendix Vil implemer. ation schedule Decide on disposition of the IGSCC tri-party agreement once performarce demonstration comes into force.
These issues proposals arenr in the t'eing studied by the NRR and RES staffs; we will develop eve al months and send them forward for approval.
Meanwhile, it has Nunne clear that NRC personnel must begin regular y
attendance at PDi :.eetings both to keep NRC better aware of ongoing activities, and to prcvide feedback to PDI on NRC acceptance of their activities.
l J Jl //
9212020o07 921123
,~
Q /g ,7 PDR ORG NREA C. ZySerpan T, Chief o
Matsrlais Erfg eering Branch Office of Nuc ear Regulatory Research
Enclosures:
As stated I
/
' N( b
/D
- J
_ __ - ------ J
- _ . ~ . . . .= - .-
EDV 2 3 is,y 6 November 1992 Information Meeting Ly PDI for NRC Serpan welcomed participants, and Jack Spanner began the presentations.
Larry Becker described the samp'es. Priority of the samples is 1. BWR plates, 2. PWR plates, 3. PWR nozzle i.r., 4. Wrought piping, 5. BWR nozzle i.r., 6. Bolting. ,
Frank Carr discussed the Program Operation Protocol. Scheduling clearly will .
be a problem. A lottery system being set up, for utilities having early inspections. Belief that it could take up to six months per vendor, times six vendors. Mark Richter discussed modeling activities. Ken Huffman, EPRI discussed implementation activities. Noted that IGSCC inspectors could also be RPV-Piping PDI inspectors, so more itepact on scheduling can occur.
John Lindberg on integration of PDI with IGSCC program. PDI & BWROG will "soon" propose a program plan to replace the old GL-88-01 IGSCC inspection requirements, But such a plan will not be available before about 3-4 manths from now.
Raam Giatonde discussed QA and costs. Frank Amirato then discussed spin-off type benefits. The first benefit is to provide flaw distribution data, and try to apply it to vessel integrity via PTS analyses. It was pointed out that PDI does not now dir- lead to a POD (probability of detection), which would then lead to a distribution and "1S1 Credit." P'1 Jreed.
Jack Spanner closed out, with schedule showing first demonstrations starting in late 1993, and completion by mid-1995. So by mid 1995, six vendors will be qualified (28WR, 4PWR), and six plants can be inspected by those teams.
Consider: ale discussion ensued over when NRC should implement Appendix VIII requirements. One option by NRC is for 1 January 1995, but PDI doesn't want it before later in 1995 after all vendors have had their first chance to qualify. Questions also arose about: inspections done at end of 10-year period, but not by PDI inspectors, followed immediately by mandated PD requirements. Finally Becker stated that RPV qualifications would not be done before 1996; however, piping inspectors probably would be ready in 1995.
hte - NRC must decide .self if we need to review and approve PDI's procedures, or simply take industry's certification that they comply with the ASME Code recuirements.
A ions Implementation schedule needs discussion - what Code addenda?
Vendor / utility schedule to be discussed Will PD1 come in for formal approval?
Develop / adopt IGSCC tri-party agreement.
Need NRC people at PDI meetings.
- _- _ . . - - _ . , - -~, . . , _ . . - - _ , _ , , , ,.
4 NRC/PD1 INFORMATION HEETING November 6, 1992 DE QCHRll1 lid.0 ' dfDb211Li C. Z. Serpan NRC/RES 301-492-3835 Jack Spanner, Jr. PDl/PG&E 510-866-5400 Frank Carr PDI/FPL 407-694-3208 S. M. (Raam) Gaitonde PDl/Comm Edison 708-450-5442 Gil Hillman NRC/RES 301-492-3848 Joe Muscara NRC/RES 301-492-3828 George Johnson NRC/NRR/DE/EMC8 301-504-3303 Winston Liu NRC/RES/DE/EME8 301-492-3822 Frank Ammirato EPRI NDE Center 740-547-6100 Mark Richter Baltimore Gas & Electric 410-787-5510 John T. Lindberg Pennsylvania Power & Light 717-542-3875 Kevin M. Graney Serch Licensing /Bechtel 301-417-3299 Grady L. Lagleder Southwest Research Inst. 210-522-2025 George Pherigo Inqual 704-455-1322 Aaron Pherigo Inqual 704-455-3717 Larry Becker EPRI NDE Center 704-547-6172 Robin Dyle Southern Nuclear /BWROG 205-877-7121 Martin Hum NRC 301-504-2730 Dan Jensen VA Power 804-273-2136 Gary Longenecker VA Corp. of Richmond 804-346-0146 Bob Whitesel NUMARC 202-872-1280 Mike Kirk NUMARC -202-872-1280 Ken lluffman EPRI 704-547-6055 Jack Lareau ABBAM DATA 203-688-2400 Karl F. Schmidt EBASCO 201-869-5001 FAX 5050 George Wasilenho Consolidated Edison 914-526-5584 Charles Willbanks Halliburton NUS 301-258-1865 h
1
l .
l l
l l
l l
l l
a.
r 4,
l l
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 l -1 F:e LLJ +! ( PE - p.. > J f St +
.m Program .y 4 . -
3 ya, jFd) y <l.p ; ~% ,
76
- r N(s u.g .
G,i3jr ;jjg 4,0 ggi yf Definition .f ; 4; -
i}.g , .
- m. a}b8j l 1 ..l.n. 4.
. . .c ,
. . i, . 1. ;,4
.- r 1 g. .-
s
,~n . - -
m 34 p 7 fx
!#iJ ?? ,.. .W 413 it d?W; 111i %g BWROG Detection & Sizing Program i
'. i ;"
$q %
g n aw,. a ge t.
r!M
, w < l g pmI aml mig
.......-........i 3 g; p h q~ag 7 u
g g g~ g gw g cee q:J <
,s .
Specimen Fabrication y
y hh px
.? :t 4: ,
?
-P o'
di .h m *g% $w >-<
- <t yy dg .c gg -4 ^- :
'I* E*T D
> 5 -st r j; g. e s4- @ { W jD bl5MFliftil^tf jj g; we sgr ' .;y First M (d '
s y Tes1 Protocol '@ ^: $
i Opportunity I $ M \J J
'{ -
};g f
[4 44 y>
Development wel s1: O Mg g Agif S 4 qi d
- , - @%(; jg wg 40 >s +e. (E pe 4 Completedg. g gp Q G 1M ;B 4 g; lt e NJ: %ER -?h) fit
- & kFM M b ,
d8I ^.Gv ng Q& .
w '
- ' y p.3 Q 1
!f
- w. t c. j l;b +
3 - a }m;, am u e._
?!? 3my 4 idA sh M T. 54M M $$ Q1 }y,$ Qh
- lid lim #1 4;g .(v* ,
& dh i
h
- f ~
\ h W.
9 L. [< ~f h
76tf4 fj
} id,
.h ib';? R@ Perf0rmance
. NDE Center Demonstrations
$g M fg%
4 g h h@f pume g
B:3 s. , w . 4 m ..: p-.4
.. ; +
Dll nier : -
~ k; a n a
_ g a n& vm'n y q; wJ ag .'n1 gwgpu g3fl Q e -
4 e w m ..
G i ~ Ti es + igg 3
@;l l$ . p# J & Qt $+ Oomonstrations we m us gp e{vg.- g* run: g;;p a Continue gg gp m.,.. .o :
n
,y .J4 i ;y
@4 s
i g .pg g. sg e u .
e 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 e .
8 -
3 i
d z
1991 l l l 1992
.. e 1993
+
1994 1995 f:
1996 m
W W Q(i R1 d . l{t c's e"' , .Jid .
Program Definition
^
N!3 f i j[ ?i[;:- M a .m; it;;
w ij; a +
d Ji ,.
g
>c ja qq .- w- , ~..% * *
'ti; s ?); f -
..: +r f5-Practice ' *~ * : Mi ? '" E
.[ sii ?
. M Samples a. ,. p.F g ,
M. 1 M: ,
A V
.g '- : > .- '+
2 r j*t ifen&{-
3
- l- mlrisi. s h e.ii it/ s < a h'
m pi e
i tji
~. f., f, '
'*1
_ . Demonstration Specimens , 1A N , 9;
& .v n .
$n Fabrication ,1,,
.p.L 4; ..
H eg m First mu
+ . + -
r
! n i "+1" 1 n s t; 1 :::i '
Test Protocol hsi:.: tl:.
9i.
-- :#1
$ ". , .J
,i g J^p;
..t n;t .;p; W .'~
F C ,.
Opportunity Completed J @
O w
y ,s c
g: Ug. :.
@wf m
, .r: %
+* n y &
./ y :gy, : q Q eM m;; a gg y,. sg g Ge: .;g "g. A v. .-
Sp! 54:
w 4} g!j 45 a 5%;;
H e
- 4. t M- cn & st g hi 1
k
~
M -
$ Y iI $td Applications M . Trial hj $R [, $p af! G j.;)
wi9 J9 j
wn i 1
.: }snh
[*. ..:.- .,
y W k m td ;
.yr;v ws 41.s:
n.. .
m:,
<J r .s m
.,. Ei n
J t 4
w;
+' ..A h
W>
< 4
$:cy;.h it + ; 1sIlji- M, s!.! #:} .O.g. Is. gN e "W + P' C" M ky Jj
- , x - 7 3
y .
,. r. - y y.:
$44 q c : -: ypu .g w; p g.'.
44 a3- e i 4d g:
tra .
4 13.. ;b Automated Demonstrat!ons y V '; H
% q ~
w $e, w. : y ya n l$ '% L
+D :W< ;. ... , A$r t ' Yb
%{o.1 p ro-f. a.- w, .
+
-..- m -- @> ,
3!c,. gte- e, e,
,g ' q" S
s
^}Id h ty &,.. F ~ ^
&e t,9i en
'; ma 1
m .i m:
.c. m g
@ Ti; $ya 6 ,a +8 Qq (je
~
? ;F 3 >;p.; Manual Demonstrations D .. M .ge ra br F%
sb
- q. H: fM: d1H d:'
G7 m N 1: . @ aa ac . 4 ,m. mr w v^ [ l- l .1 1, a r , 2 g i
f 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 g 8 N .
so 9%
5 '
bel
NOV 2 3 193;>
Distribution:
E. Beckjord T. Speis R. Bosnak J. Sniezek T. Murley J. Richardson J. Strosnider G. Johnson M. Hum J. Muscara M. Vagins G. Millman W . L i t.
Public Document Room l
i l
l l
i