ML20127N905

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Provides Status Rept by NRC Incident Investigation Team at Facility Re Two Auxiliary Feedwater Valves That Closed & Would Not Reopen.Turbine Vendor (Terry Turbines) Contacted. Licensee Continuing Investigation
ML20127N905
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 06/25/1985
From: Heltemes C
NRC OFFICE FOR ANALYSIS & EVALUATION OF OPERATIONAL DATA (AEOD)
To: Dircks W
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
References
NUDOCS 8507020238
Download: ML20127N905 (2)


Text

a

- - POL

/ <

June 25, 1985 NOTE T0: William J. Dircks O Executive Director for Operations FROM: C. J. Heltemes, Jr., Director Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data

SUBJECT:

STATdSREPO.RTFROMTHENRCINCIDENTINVESTIGATION Ti(AM AT DAVIS BESSE At approximately 3:30pm on June 21, 1985, E. Rossi reported the following progress:

1. The troubleshooting and inspection of the two AFW valves (599 and 608) that closed and would not reopen continued. A vendor (M0 VATS) special-izing in the testing and troubleshooting of motor operated valves (MOVs) has completed an initial analysis. This analysis indicated that both valves apparently had incorrect adjustments on the bypass switch for the torque switch. The adjustments of this bypass switch were reported to be not in accordance with the applicable procedures, and further, M0 VATS believes that even if these bypass switches were set according to the procedure, the valves may not have opened. (Note that different individuals adjusted the bypass switches on the two valves.)

The current failure mode being investigated is that a high delta pressure (present during the event) may cause an increased load on the valve opera-tor. The bypass switch was set to allow the torque switch to be functional. at 5% of travel; however, the hi operating or test conditions)gh maydelta causepressure a loading (not such present during normal that the torque is above the torque switch setting at 5% valve travel.

The licensee noted that testing to date without the high delta pressure

- has no't reproduced the failure, and that this type of failure has not been previously experienced. The team at this time has not made a conclusion that the licensee has identified the failure cause. The team is particularly concerned that the licensee has not been able to reproduce the failure under test conditions.

8507020238 850625 DR ADOCK 050 Q 6 54-3 %

. . R William J. Dircks The licensee is considering the possibility of a test of the valve under high delta pressure conditions to see if the failure can be reproduced and to see if it is a function of the bypass switch setting (e.g., would adjustment to cut in the torque switch at 10% of travel prevent failure)?

2. The action plan for troubleshooting of the AFW pump turbines by the licensee was also reviewed by the team. By design, each of the AFW pumps is aligned (in terms of both steam and feedwater) to a specific steam generator. Through actions of the SFRCS, each AFW pump can be realigned to the other steam generator. This action would be taken if, for example, there is a leak or rupture associated with one of the steam generators.

Thus, when the operator mistakenly operated both SFRCS switches during the event, the system reacted as if neither steam generator was operable by having AFW pump 1 align to SG-2 and AFW pump 2 align to SG-1 (for both steam and feedwater).

Under this condition, the steamlines feeding the AFW pump turbines are about twice as long as the normal alignment. Further, these steamlines are horizontal and subjected to cooling. It is postulated by the licensee, therefore, that steam started to condense when the AFW system was called upon and either the entrained water interfered with the governor opera-tion, or the water flashed in such a way to provide more energy once it entered the turbine. .

The turbine vendor (Terry Turbines) has been contacted, and the licensee is continuing its investigation.

(signed)

C. J. Heltemes, Jr., Director Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data cc: H. Denton J. Taylor J. Keppler E. Rossi