ML20127N356
| ML20127N356 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Limerick  |
| Issue date: | 05/22/1985 |
| From: | Conner T CONNER & WETTERHAHN, PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20127N270 | List: |
| References | |
| OL, NUDOCS 8505230501 | |
| Download: ML20127N356 (2) | |
Text
-
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONG 00LKETED
'Before the Atomic Safety andUflib nsing Board In the Matter of g p j.39 Philadelphia Electric Company
)
Docket Nos. 50-3520-10F SEC8t. laid 50-3530' (Limerick Generating Station, OC (TING & SEPVICI Units 1 and 2)
) BRANCH APPLICANT'S RESPONSE TO COMMENTS OF OTHER PARTIES CONCERNING THE BOARD'S ORDER DATED MAY 9, 1985 On May 9, 1985, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, in the : captioned proceeding, granted ' pplicant's ;r'equest for; A
an exemption pursuant to 10 CFR S 50.47 relating to the coverage of the offsite emergency plan for the Limerick Plant as it applies to the Inmates of the State Correctional Institution at Graterford (Graterford).
In its Order, the Board provided for 10 days any parties opposing the issuance of such Order to submit comments.
The Applicant was allowed 5 days to respond.
(The order did not specify whether the comments were to be in hand or simply filed by mailing.)
The Applicant received in the mail today the "NRC Staff Comments On The Licensing Board's May 9, 1985 Order Granting Applicant An Exemption" dated May 20, 1985, and the " State-ment Of Anthony / FOE In' Opposition To Granting Applicant's Motion For Exemption From 10CFR 50.47 (a)
(b)
Ret 8505230501 850522 hDR ADOCK 05000332 PDR N
r f' i
Evacuation ' Plans For Inmates" dated -May 16,
- 1985, both addressed to the Board.
For the record, the Applicant also notes a filing by Limerick Ecology Action with the Appeal Board-dated May 20, 1985, supplementing its previous motion
-for a stay; the Appeal Board's " Memorandum and Order" dated May 21,'1985, dismissing the Graterford inmates' appeal; and the letter from the Secretary of the Commission dated May 20,1985, to the undersigned counsel, all of which discuss and interpret the Board's May 9, 1985 Order.
As the record reflects, Limerick Unit 1 is ready for ascent to power above the present 5% limit. /
The Applicant notes that none of the filings referred to above contains any. new' silbstantive 'informatilon.
Therefore, in an a'ttempt' l
to avoid further delay, the Applicant will not file any further response as provided in the Board's Order of'May 9, 1985.
Respectfully submitted, CONNER & WETTERHAHN, P.C.
p ( n u.: 1 av 3
Tro Conner, Jr.
Counse for the Applicant May 22, 1985
- /
It is noted that the Staff's response dated May 20, 1985, reflects that it has not yet received the final Federal Emergency Management Agency report (at p.5).