ML20127L736
| ML20127L736 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 06/25/1985 |
| From: | Bailey J GEORGIA POWER CO., SOUTHERN COMPANY SERVICES, INC. |
| To: | Adensam E Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| GN-647, NUDOCS 8506280111 | |
| Download: ML20127L736 (20) | |
Text
Georgia Power Company Route 2 Box 299A WayrQtorgGeorgia 30830 Telephoneut 554-9961 404 724-8114-Southern Company Services, Inc.
Post Office Box 2625 Birmingham, Alabama 35202 Telephone 205 870-6011 Vogtle Proj.ect June 25, 1985 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation File: X7BC35 Attention: Ms. Elinor G. Adensam, Chief Log:
GN-647 Licensing Branch #4 Division of Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 NRC DOCKET NUMBERS 50-424 AND 50-425 CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NUMBERS CPPR-108 AND CPPR-1239 V0GTLE ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT - UNITS 1 AND 2 REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: CHAPTER 13
Dear Mr. Denton:
As a result of a telephone conversation with members of your staff on May 24, 1985, the attached proposed changes have been made to Chapter 13.
If these changes are acceptable with your staff, they will be incorporated in a future amendment to the VEGP FSAR.
.If your staff requires any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely, J. A. Bailey Project Licensing Manager JAB /caa Attachment xc:
D. O. Foster G. Bockhold, Jr R. A. Thomas H. H. Gregory, III J. E. Joiner, Esquire T. Johnson (W/o Att.)
B. W. Churchill, Esquire D. C. Teper (W/o Att.)
M. A. Miller L. Fowler B. Jones, Esquire (W/o Att.)
W. C. Ramsey L. T. Gucwa Vogtle Project File' 8506280111 850625 0053V PDR ADOCK 05000424 Mg A
[
V Q
o
A %.ckment VEGP-ESAR-13 superintendent reports to the initial test program manager.
The positions reporting to the preoperational test superintendent are lead test supervisors, procedures s
ervisor, rend--special test supervisor, aws( /4./
u J h,1 4 s q v veJa r.
G.
The spedial test supervisor is responsible for conducting special tests as described in the startup manual and for directing the individuals providing support for such test activities.
The special test supervisor reports to the preoperational test superintendent.
H.
The procedures supervisor is responsible for the development of and adherence to procedure preparation schedules and administrative requirements.
The procedures supervisor reports to the preoperational test superintendent.
16 I.
The lead test supervisor is responsible for ensuring timely implementation of preoperational-phase testing and turnover activities so as to support initial test program objectives and milestones.
The lead test supervisor reports to the preoperational test superintendent.
The lead test supervisor provides programmatic and technical assistance and direction to the test supervicors in the performance of turnover and testing activities.
J.
The test supervisor is responsible for the conduct of the system turnover and testing activities to support the initial test program objectives and milestones.
The test supervisor reports to the lead test supervisor.
K.
The hot functional and startup test superintendent is responsible for directing the activitico amovviated Nith flushing, energi2ation, het functional testing and e
- e,- *,, m eme*4m~
rw 4 e mme4+4mm.mpo
- e
- m
% 4ma+4 3 tNNt h eqNN A nagN ? t U A N N l l A f A AA<5l.?IN A c/ llu k.,f[a fn{ & 5/w/u
/cs n (r m a+
,, a a, f A qlu nm na aray & c y% Pl<d " A j
sNaf
> It j obh,' n *hs b i (W*[ " Y
y
,.,. n,, a pu.- i. a wm ~y 13.1.2-8 Amend. 16 4/85
VEGP-FSAR-13 The positions reporting to the hot functional and startup test superintendent are the e y-gisaLien-superviscr,- startup test superviso "E6t functional test supervisor, and flushing supervisor.
L.
The startup test supervisor and hot functional test supervicor are responsible for conducting the assigned tests and for directing the individuals providing the support for the test activities.
These positions report to the hot functional and startup test superintendent.
They will be supported by plant personnel, contractors, and other Southern system employees in completing their assignments.
M.
The flushing supervisor is responsible f-cu the-hot- -
funct4onal and ntartup_ test _superinundent for the development and implementation of the flushing procedures and to coordinate the implementation of the flushing procedures in order to verify plant systems are cleaned to the cleanness level specified.
16 The flushing supervisor reports to the obi tional-rA 2nd ctart-up test superintendent.
The positions reporting to,the flushing supervisor represent a matrix-type organization.
Test supervisors will report to the flushing supervisor while their assigned systems are being flushed.
Also reporting to him will be flushing support such as plant operations personnel, laboratory personnel, and flushing suppor$-
crafts from construction.
'~
he energization supervisor is respone ble for ene zation of the plant electri distribution in a NJ t 5
safe an mely manner as neefe to support the initial test program ectives and milestones.
W/o The energization sup /
visor reports to the hot functional and,ptnrtup test superintendent.
The ener zation supervisor coordinates electrical syste construction acceptance tests and preoperational t
s to support the initial test progbag, to minimize he use of temporary power, and to minimiz y ower disruptions of the plant electrical distribuh ns.
l l
l 1
l 13.1.2-9 Amend. 16 4/85
L INSERT N SHIFT TEST DIRECTOR The Shift Test Director (STD) is appointed by the ITPM to serve on a rotating basis with other individuals so appointed. The STD works for the Initial Test Program Manager and-provides the daily control and prioritization of testing activities.
The STD has the authority and the responsibility to establish work priorities on a daily basis if needed to meet the goal and objectives of the test program.
The STD position is an expansion of the duties previously assigned to the ener-gization Supervisor who's position has been deleted.
INSERT 0 Test Review Board (TRB) is responsible for reviewing / recommending selected Ini-tial Test Program porcedures for implementation, reviewing / recommending signi-ficant revisions to Initial Tes+. Program procedures, and reviewing / recommending approval of results of Initial Test Program procedures.
The TRB consists of personnel from Georgia Power Company - Nuclear Operations, Bechtel Power Corporation, and Westinghouse Electric Corporation.
Regular TRB members are those persons recommended by the Initial Test Program Manager and approved by the General Manager Vogtle Nuclear Operations (GMVNO). The chair-man of the TRB is designated by the GMVNO.
The alternate members of the TRB-are selected by the Initial Test Program Manager or General Manager Vogtle Nuclear Operations (or his designee). A quorum shall consist of the chair-man or vice chairman and three other regular members or alternate members.
)
INITIAL TEST PROGRAM MANAGER "ibsM Trst Prmot
.% +
E0A 74)
% < eC1% s G CONSTRUCTION HOT FUNCTIONAL SCHEDUUNG PREOP TEST ACCEPTANCE TEST SUPERINTENDENT
& STARTUP TEST A PLANNING SUPERINTENDENT /
St E RINTE NDENT l SUPERINTENDENT l g
1
"^ ^
SCHEDULE SPECIAL TEST ZA
\\
~
SUPERVISOR l
SUPERVISOR VI
-g a son g
r g
ELECTRICAL STARTW PROCEDURES SCOPING
^
SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR R SOR l
SUPE SOR
/
I11%I'ef fe'il HOT FUNCTIONAL LEAD TEST 0 & C CAT SUPERVISOR l
SUPERVISOR ggp g
/
I TEST SUPERVISOR f
L F/vshis/g CufMis0K Flyshiny f%64-15 Amend. 15 3/85 PREOPERATION AND STARTUP VOGTLE ORGANIZATION Qq' l\\ger g
ELecTneC GENERATING PL ANT UNIT 1 ANO UN4T 2 FIGURE 13.1.2-2 mes e
( -
VEGP-FSAR-13 13.1.3 QUALIFICATIONS OF PERSONNEL 13.1.3.1 Qualifications Requirements American National Standards Institute (ANSI) N18.1-1971, Standard for Selection and Training for Nuclear Power Plar.ts, is currently used as a basis for establishing the qualifications for personnel in the plant organization.
Personnel will cith r meet the minimum education and experience recommendations of ANSI 18.1-197f ~.
1 wvmpicuc a
qual;ficatica progrcq which ul.1 dcmenstrat: th ir ability to pcrfcrr their jcb functicr Table 13.1.3-1 with designated ANSI N18.1 equivalent titles, states the requirements for work experience and educational background for key plant personnel.
The following definitions will be used for qualification of personnel.
13.1.3.2 De,finitions Nuclear power plant - A nuclear power plant is any plant Using a nuclear reactor to produce electric power, process steam, or space heating.
Experience - Experience is actual applicable working experience in design, construction, startup, operation, maintenance, or technical services.
Academic training - Academic training is successfully completed college level work leading to a recognized degree.
Related technical training - Related technical training is formal training beyond the high school level in technical subjects associated with the position in question, acquired in training echools or programs conducted by the military, industry, utilities, universities, vocational schools, or others.
On-the-job training - On-the-job training is participation in nuclear power plant startup, operation, maintenance, or technical services under the direction of appropriately experienced personnel.
Ie 04 Oef 4Rt. (o°d goAlINed 4o ytrhrm All dNIGS W d e pd.>
f Nn. 4o mu% 4W <ecomeadiosi, of ANs 1 is. I -M11 yer,sonnel eq be, Not k b pfb'UA syeCh(c. Mbh Aub S$h he $
sht b Ao U
u W % m W % %s u p W hy.
13.1.3-1
(
VEGP-FSAR-13 13.4 OPERATIONAL REVIEW Operating activities that affect nuclear safety are reviewed.
The review program is implemented prior to initial fuel loading and ensures review and evaluation of tests and experiments, unplanned events, and proposed change.
The program complies within the requirements of 10 CFR 50.54 relating to proposed changes, tests, and experiments.
This program is conducted following the recommendations of Regulatory Guide 1.33, Rec.2 1978, Quality Assurance Program Requirements (Operations), and ANSI N18.7-1976, Administrative Controls and Quality Assurance for the Operational Phase of Nuclear Power Plants.
The general manager - Vogtle nuclear operations (GMVNO) has responsibility for safe operation of the plant.
He is kept abreast of plant operating conditions by the supervisors who are knowledgeable and experienced in their areas of job responsibility.
The supervisors monitor operating and maintenance activities as part of their normal duties.
In addition, a formal review program is carried out for changes to systems, procedures, tests, experiments, and after-the-fact 16 review and evaluation of unplanned events that affect nuclear safety.
This program is implemented through standing committees, as described below.
13.4.1 ONSITE REVIEW The plant review board (PRB) serves as a review and advisory group to the GMVNO.
The PRB reviews plant administration, I
maintenance, and operations as related to nuclear safety and environmental aspects; ensures these activities are consistent with company policy-approved procedures and operating license provisions; and makes recommendations to the GMVNO on matters brought before it.
4 Mpffhs0R oran stJdWic 160 Vd w
poppg of, as a minimum, one membcr of the plant qgjgg gg The PRB is,Orosepq rom d1 ciplinary p ups isted belowe % yQQ sta{f IrNer{to 5 h III o.5 \\v d
h Of'*b"1
- p e
Maintenance.
e Quality Control (QC).
e Health Physics or Chemistry.
e Regulatory Compliance.
Plant Engineering and Services.
13.4.1-1 Amend. 16 4/85
f VEGP-FSAR-13 Collectively, these members possess the type and degree of expertise required to review unplanned events and proposed changes to systems, procedures, tests, and experiments that affect nuclear safety.
The chairman and vice chairman of the PRB are designated by the GMVNO.
The minimum quorum of the PRB will consist of the PRB chairman or vice and four members.
The PRB meets at least once per calendar month.
The PRB is specifically responsible for the following:
A.
Review of:
1.
Procedures that establish plantwide administrative controls to implement the quality assurance program or technical specification surveillance program.
2.
Procedures for changing plant operating modes.
3.
Emergency and abnormal operating procedures.
4.
Procedures for effluent releases of radiological 16 consequence.
5.
Fuel handling procedures.
p B.
Review of:
1.
Program required by Technical Specifications.
2.
Proposed procedures and changes to procedures,
.cs m y _ _...,
f-a _ _ _... a that involve an unreviewed safetyguestionas
"
- N' s P W W 4 " ""'"' p r
O CFR 50.59.
- C' y W E Q W *A hdeQ %fD 4
propoIedtdstsandexp iments that suv iTb O
Review o
-an-unreviewed -safety question. a cA-aNc\\og s p
Review of proposed changes to the Technical Specifications.
f Review of the report of the investigation of violations of the technical specification that covers evaluation and recommendations to prevent recurrence.
1 0'
Rev.ew of all reportable events.
g f.
Review evaluations of plant operations to detect I
potential nuclear safety hazards.
fif.
Performance of specia,1 reviews, investigations, or I
analyses and reports thereon as requested by the GMVNO or the Safety Review Board.
13.4.1-2 Amend. 16 4/85
I VEGP-ESAR-13 13.4.2 INDEPENDENT REVIEW The Safety Review Board (SRB) provides an independent review and
(
audit of designated activities in the following areas:
e Nuclear power plant operations.
e Nuclear engineering.
e Chemistry and radiochemistry.
e Metallurgy.
Instrumentation and control.
e Radiological safety.
e Mechanical and electrical engineering.
Quality assurance practices.
e
)
I Specifically, the SRB will review:
16 I
r
~
A.
The safety evaluations for changes to procedures, i
equipment, or systems, and tests or experiments i
completed under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.59 to
[
verify that such actions did not constitute an unreviewed safety question.
B.
Proposed changes to procedures, equipment, or systems h
which involve an unreviewed safety question as defined in 10 CFR 50.59.
4 C.
Proposed tests or experiments which involve an 1
unreviewed safety question as defined in 10 CFR t
50.59.
(_.,
D.
Proposed changes to technical specifications or operating license.
}
E.
Violations of codes, regulations, orders, technical L
specifications, license requirements, or of internal procedures or instructions having nuclear safety i' -
significance.
F.
Significant operating abnormalities or deviations from normal and expected performance of plant equipment that affect nuclear safety, i
G.
-The-results-of-the-PRO ' s review--of kil reportable events.
l' l
13.4.2-1 Amend. 16 4/85 l
t
~.
r w
-y VEGP-FSAR-13 13.4.3 INDEPENDENT SAFETY ENGINEERING REVIEWS An independent safety engineering group (ISEG) will be established prior to initial fuel loading to perform independent reviews of plant operations with emphasis on improving plant safety.
13.4.3.1 Conposition The ISEG will be comprised of a minimum of five qualified individuals who will report to the manager-nuclear operations analysis in the corporate of?lce.
13.4.3.2 Qualifications 2.
ISEG members will have a bachelor's degree in engineering or applied science with a minimum of f years experience in etite 4heiz field, including at least 6 month -nuclear experience.
4 \\ t40u 4
13.4.3.3 Responsibilities
~
The ISEG will be responsible for:
16 A.
Review of plant operating characteristics, NRC issuances, iniuttry advisories, and other appropriate sources of plant design and operating experience information that may incicate areas for improving plant safety.
B.
Review of selected plant activities including maintenance modifications, operational problems, and operational analysis, and in the establishment of programmatic requirements for plant activities.
The ISEG will develop and present detailed recommendations to the appropriate level of management for improvements such as revisions to procedures or equipment modifications.
C.
Maintaining surveillance of plant operations and
( ;
maintenance activities to provide independent verification that these activities are performed correctly, and that human errors are reduced as far as practicable.
D.
Providing a report of their activities at~least once i
per month to advise corporate management of the overall quality and safety of operations.
13.4.3-1 Amend. 16 4/85
r VEGP-FSAR-13 13.5 PLANT PROCEDURES This section describes administrative, maintenance, and operating procedures that will be used by the operating organization to ensure that routine, o f f-no rmal', and emergency activities are conducted in a safe manner.
Operations affecting safety will be conducted in accordance with detailed written and approved procedures.
- 1. 5.1 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES Administrative procedures provide rules, instructions, policies, practices, or guidelines for the plant staff.
They will be completed at least 6" months prior to Unit 1 initial fuel loading.
13.5.1.1 Administrative Procedure Descriptions A.
Procedures for Preparation, Review, and Control of Procedures These procedus== escaoAlsa che couisvis "er *ke pg ration, review, and control of all plant
((b[_
l?" ppoce es.
Included within these procedures ar p rovisio to ensure that new or revised proc res a re q
ruviewed fo adequacy by appropriately qual ied
.'UhSO porsonnel and proved for release by au orized 1
)
porsonnel.
The eral manager - Vog nuclear l
I l37 hs L e i operations has ulti te responsibi y for all plant l
j p rocedures; howe rov 4si n 's made to establish {
d epartment heads e
BT g authority for thosei p rocedures cover ng activit within their area of r esponsibility.
Provisi s ext to ensure that c hanges or revisions procedures e reviewed and f
pproved in accorda e with the same inistrative I
a controls used fo eview and approval o w
l procedures.
A rovision is made to ensure at plant j
procedures reviewed at least every 2 year ya i
1 mowledge
_e individual to determine whether ch a re nec sary or desirable.
Other provisions ens gesf e
that ocedures, once approved, are distributed ap priately so that only the most current procedur s.
a etNred i, pl;nt ;-vannnel -
B.
Procedures for Making Temporary Changes to Procedures This procedure provides the method for making a temporary change to an approved plant procedure.
13.5.1-1 Amend. 16 4/85
r ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE DESCRIPTIONS Insert 13.5.1.1 A.
Procedures for Preparation, Review, and Control of Procedures These procedures establish the controls for the preparation, review, and control of plant procedures which cover activities as described in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.33, Rev. 2.
Included within these procedures are provisions to ensure that new or revised procedures are reviewed for adequacy by appropriately qualified personnel other than the originator.
In accordance with these procedures, a reviewer shall establish knowledge of the applicable requirements for a procedure and shall verify the proper incorporation of these requirements in the procedure; additionally, a reviewer shall assess whether the procedure or procedure revision potentially involves a change in the VEGP Technical Specifications or an unreviewed safety question.
To ensure the qualification of reviewers for performing procedure
- reviews, departmental reviewer qualification checklists shall be used.A These checklists shall ensure that reviewers are
% 86 8
~ knowledgeable in the subject area covering the procedures they will checth:sd w.d review and that they have adequate understanding of the QA Program i
E "fd ' th5 revleu and approval of the review by the responsible VEGP Nuclear e
reguirenents.,. The acceptability of procedure reviews is assured by Plev Is b Operations department heads; the experience and education on an pradtt individual basis that qualifies department heads to perform this
<t.MWi,
approval of procedure reviews is delineated in FSAR Table 13.1.2-1
" Resumes of Onsite Supervisory Pe rsonnel. "
Nuclear Operations department heads shall further ensure that procedures described in FSAR Section 13.4.1 are forwarded to the Plant Review Board (PRB) for additional review.
The General Manager - Vogtle Nuclear Operations (GMVN0) has ultimate responsibility for all plant procedures.
Provisions of these procedures establish the GMVN0 as the approving authority for procedures which establish plant wide administrative controls (which implement the Quality Assurance Program and the Technical Specifications Surveillance Program), for Unit Operating Procedures (U0P's), Emergency Operating Procedures (E0P's), Abnormal Operating Procedures (A0P's), procedures for implementing the Security Plan, the Emergency Plan, and the Fire Protection Program, and Fuel Handling Procedures.
Nuclear Operations department heads are established as the approving authority for other procedures covering activities within their area of responsibility.
Additional provisions of these procedures exist to ensure that changes or revisions to procedures are reviewed and approved in accordance with the same administrative controls used for review and approval of new procedures.
A provision is made to ensure that plant procedures are reviewed at least every 2 years by a knowledgeable individual to determine whether changes are necessary or desirable.
Also provisions exist to ensure that procedures, once approved, are distributed appropriately so that only the most current procedures are used by plant personnel.
Controls for the preparation, review and approval of Initial Test Program Procedures are described in FSAR Section 14.2.2.
i VEGP-FSAR-13 access; while the requirements for establishing the lines of authority, responsibility, and succession in the control room are addressed by the procedures f
described in section E.
E.
Procedures for Operating Duties, Responsibilities, and Authority These procedures clearly describe the duties, responsibilities, and authority for the control room personnel, which include the onshift operations supervisor, the shift supervisor, the plant operator, the assistant plant operator, and the shift technical advisor.
The command line of authority for these personnel is established by these procedures.
Specifically, the onshift operations supervisor is established as the senior operations representative on each shift and shall have responsibility for the safe and efficient operation of the plant.
The shift supervisor is established as having responsibility for the safe and efficient operation of his assigned unit, j
since a shift supervisor is assigned to each operating l@
unit on each shift.
Included in these procedures are l
provisions for the onshift operations supervisor to maintain a broad perspective of operational conditions affecting the safety of the plant at all times and provisions for him not to become totally involved in any single operation during plant transients or emergency conditions.
Other provisions establish the onshift operatio.ns supervisor as having the authority and responsibility to declare emergencies and for functioning as the emergency director until being relieved of this responsibility by a higher ranking qualified manager.
Provisions for ensuring that the onshift operations supervisor is not routinely performing administrative functions that could detract from or that are subordinate to his command function and his responsibility for ensuring the safe operation of the plant are exemplified by the following:
i 1.
An operations supervisor who is not on shift shall prepare work and vacation schedules.
i 2.
The. shift supervisor shall issue clearances for equipment within his assigned unit.
3.
The shift supervisor shall have the adm1nistrative duty of limiting access to the control room.
7#5cA li qp 13.5.1-3 Amend. 16 4/85
INSERT E The General Manager Vogtle Nuclear Operations (GMVN0) shall annually review the administrative duties of the on-shift operations supervisor to ensure that he is not routinely performing administrative duties as described.
Also, the GMVN0 will annually reissue a directive that emphasizes the pri-mary management responsibility of the on-shift operations supervisor.(or during his absence from the control room, the individual designated to assume the command functions) for safe operation of the plant under all conditions on his shift and that clearly establishes his command duties.
r
]
~
VEGP-FSAR-13 the offgoing control room operator responsibility the
,)
need to ensure that his relief is fully aware of V
existing plant conditions and is alert, coherent, and fully capable of performing his assigned duties. /1550RI procedures are in accordance with the requirements of NUREG-0737, item I.C.2.
I.
Equipment Control Procedures '
These procedures provide instructions for releasing plant equipment or systems for maintenance, testing,.or inspection; they establish the shift supervisor as the responsible authority for issuing and releasing clearances for equipment to be taken out of service within his assigned unit.
The provisions of these procedures include steps to ensure that equipment taken out of service and placed in a controlled status is clearly identified by the ute of tagging.
Other provisions provide for a second qualified person verifying the isolation or restoration of a safety-related component or system, including proper realignment unless functional testing can be performed 16 to prove the correct realignment of all equipment, valves, and switches involved.
In cases of significant radiation exposure, a second verification of safety-related system alignment will not be made.
Additional provisions are made to maintain the status of equipment and to determine the operability of equipment upon return to service; on return to service a system lineup verification will be made and additional lineup verifications may be made at periedic intervals while in service.
These procedures address the requirements of NUREG-0737, item I.C.6 and item II.K.l.10, and the requirements of ANSI N1817-1976, Section 5.2.6, relative to equipment control.
J.
Maintenance and Modification Administrative Control Procedures Maintenance of equipment and plant modifications l
important to plant safety are performed in accordance with written procedures as described in paragraph l
13.5.2.2.
Administrative controls are provided to ensure compliance with applicable codes, regulations, I
and requirements.
1 l
K.
Fire Protection Procedures The VEGP fire protection program is governed and l
implemented through the use of fire protection l
l 13.5.1-5 Amend. 16 4/85
?
INSERT H Provisions are provided to ensure that other appropriate supervisory per-sonnel, including maintenance and instrument and control personnel develop shift logs to update on-coming shifts of plant activities.
r g
}
VEGP-FSAR-14 4
J.
Attachments This section shall contain any attachments necessary to fully document the test results.
Recorder traces, computer printouts, pump curves, etc., may be included as attachments.
/
A 14.2.2.2 Procedure Review and Approval s = < L.,+
__..sf 1 3
t2_
2__2____
2_
_______2mi_
.s.
a proval of initial test program test procedures.
In i
g ener preoperational test procedures will go throug i
m inimum two review cycles by the designated review s,
B echtel P r Corporation, Westinghouse Electric C
- ration, a nd GPC.
S tup test procedures will be review as d esignated by a plant manager.
C omments from the signated reviewers wil e consolidated by t he procedure coordi tor and returned t the procedure writer T he procedure writer wi incorporate e comments in the procedure or will justif a reaso for not including the comments in the test proc e.
As a minimum, the test proced listed in this chapter will be submitted for review to e te review board for preoperational test proce res or to e plant review board fc r startup test procedures rior to appro 1 by the plant manager or designee.
Upon applicable review oard's recommendations, plant manager or his ignee will be responsible for o mining any necessary chan and j'
resubmitting procedure to the appropriate iew board.
U pon the app ' cable review board's recommendation the plant manager or esignee shall approve the procedure.
S sequent changes preoperational test procedures are ruviewe and
{
approv or disapproved by the test review board.
Chan to i
star p tests will be reviewed and approved or disapprove y
[
tl%
n1mne vau4mu knmed s -
'="4='
T ;; i; tail; p ;;;i;;;; ;;^;;;ia; ;;;;;i;;; p::;1:1tien.
i2
- 21=== ;==^
- L 2=2 L= th= =t==tu; 211 *==
5;:;;;;;;;;ti;;;l t::t p :::ir;;; :ni in tr.: pl:nt p::::ir;;;
_.- I f..
.te.;;, te;; r.eeet...;.
14.2.2.3 Conduct of the Test Program i
Georgia Power Company administers and conducts the initial test program using approved procedures.
System turnover is made by the construction department to the power generation department.
14.2.2-4
- -. ~, -... - -.
-, _... -, ~.,
\\
l g g g Procedure Review & Approval 14.2.2.2 The General Manager Vogtle Nuclear Operations or t.i_ 2:Myr, the Initial Test Program Manager (ITPM), is responsible for the review and approval of freoperational fest frocedures and startup test procedures. In general freoperati fest froceduresandstartuptestproceduresgoth minimum of two review cycles prior to submittal to the Test Review Board for preoperational test procedures and Plant Review Board for startup test procedures. Each cycle includes reviews by I
Georgia Power Company test supervisof, Bechtel Power Corporation representative, and/or the Westinghouse Electric Corporation representative as appropriate.
Asaminimum,thefreoperationalandstartuptestprocedures listed in this chapter are submitted for review to the Test Review Board or Plant Review Board. Test fkocedures that are not satisfactory are resolved under the direction of the board prior to recommendation for approval. The Test Review Board and Plant Review Board recommend approval to the General Manager Vogtle Nuclear Operations or his designae of procedures found acceptable. The General Manager Vogtle Nuclear Operations or Me fer*r: approves the procedure.
4 %.TnibJl Test Trognun Aap Subsequent revisions to the Preoperational Test Procedstre and startup.$mst.grocedure are handled in a manner similar to a new proc'edure?
Qualifications of the above plant personnel who review and approve preoperational and startup test procedures are addressed in section 13.1.2.
l The above proces,ses are further described in the Startup I
Manual.
0234m l
l
f
=
9 VEGP-FSAR-14 Upon acceptance of the turnover, administrative controls (detailed in the startup manual) become effective.
All phases of testing (with the exception of certain con-struction-performed tests) are under the control of the system test supervisor.
i-Construction acceptance testing generally begins at the time of equipment / system turnover.
This testing must be completed, or excepted (as provided for in the startup manual), prior to beginning the preoperational test.
The procedure for development of construction acceptance testing procedures is provided in the startup manual.
Whenever practical, cleanliness verification testing will be performed, using approved procedures, prior to the initiation of fluid flow in the system during preoperational testing.
Upon completion of construction acceptance testing, subject to the priorities of the startup schedule (s), the preoperational tests are performed.
The preoperational tes't phase will be governed by procedures in the startup manual.
The startup test phase will be governed by plant procedures.
s 14.2.2.4 Review, Evaluation, and Approval of Test Results See Ctwsect T ;.;; ult; cf th; p;;;;;;;ti;n:1 :nd st:rtup t :t cre r ev _
d initially by the test supervisor and the appropr' P
t est coo
- ator.
When all acceptance criteria for p reoperation ests are met (or excepted), the ts listed in t nis chapter wil submitted to the test lew board.
For s tartup tests, the tes ill be submit to the plant review b aard once the acceptance
' eria e been met (or excepted).
T ie members of the applic revie ard will review the test r esults.
Test results at are not sati ctory will be r esolved under th rection of the board pri to test a :ceptance.
e acceptance criteria have been m to the b )ard's sfaction, the' members will recommend that plant or designee approve the test as complete.
Complet m an
? rir "ill he---e p rt cf th: pern n:nt plant
- d.
i L
14.2.2-5
7-
.e h
Review, Evaluation, and Approval to Test Results
- 14.2.2.4 Upon completion of a freoperational fest and/or startup test, the test supervisor prepares a test results package and submits it for review.
The General Manager Vogtle Nuclear Operations or 1 ^-
'; r,~
l the Initial Test Program Manager (ITPM), is responsible for the review and approval of freoperational 2est and startup
/fest results. In general, preoperational and startup test 8
results are reviewed and approved by the same organizations i
and levels of authority as reviewed and approved the pre-operational test procedure and startup test procedure. This includes a review of comments by the Georgia Power Company test supervisor, Bechtel Power Corporation representative and/or Westinghouse Electric Corporation representative as appropriate to submittal of a preoperational and startup test results package to the appropriate review board. As a minimum, results of preoperational and startup tests listed in this chapter are submitted to the Test Review Board.
The Test Review Board reviews the greoperational/fest results package and the Plant Review Board reviews startup test results package. Test results packages that are not satisfactory are resolved under direction of the board prior to recommendation of the package for approval. The Test Review Board and Plant Review Board recommends approval to the General Manager Vogtle Nuclear Operations or designee of test results packages f p b The r
Manager Vogtle Nuclear Operations or a pro e
results package as complete. Completed test result packages become part of the permanent plant records.
(
Qualifications of the above referenced plant personnel who review and approve preoperational and startup test results is addressed in Section 13.1.2.
l
[
The above process is further described in the Startup Manual.
0234a i
l l
I l
l s_.