ML20127L293

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Applicant Answer to Telegram from K Dzugan,T Pepin & G Burnett.*
ML20127L293
Person / Time
Site: Monticello Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/02/1970
From: Charnoff G
NORTHERN STATES POWER CO., SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE
To:
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
References
NUDOCS 9211230484
Download: ML20127L293 (2)


Text

-

he. ,

) *

,/  ; .-

.>) .--

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ATOMIC ENEROY C0!C4ISSION,'

e In the Matter of -

)l kMM s -

HORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY h Docket.Not 50a263a ,

Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant )

d pOk Unit 1 . )

APPLICANT'S ANSWER TO TELEGRAM FROM KENHETH DZbOAN, THEODORE PEPIN AND GEORGE BURNETT_

1. The Notice of Hearing in the captioned proceeding, and the AEC's Rules of Practice (10 CFR Part 2), provida two methods for participation by members of the public in the public hearing to be held in this proceeding on April 28, 1970. A member of the public, pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR $ 2.715, may make a limited appearance and there-by present an oral or written statement setting forth his views, and the questions he would like answered, with respect to the issues to be considered at the hearing. A member of the public may also participate in the hearing as a party to the proceeding if he files a suitabic petition for leave to intervene which meets the requirements of 10 CFR 9 2;714.

4 By telegram received by t,he AEC H Street Services. U nit,.

2.

Kgnneth Dzugan, Theodore Pepin and George Burnett said~"We wish to be an' intervener" in the public hearing.in the cap-tioned proceeding pursuant to 10 CFR $ 2;714. 'The' telegram.

.. alleges.that the senders are " concerned consumers-of?the_

~

- s n facility in question." -

Rec'd of Di .of Reg. ,

9211230484 700402 Date # 3 7E PDR ADOCK 05000263 Ik'g)'g gm f 4  : & ? e-

& PDR

.. ..~.

' C. ' ' ' ~-

n. W K W tt# @,

" ' ~ "

l

(s\d

)

$)

4 3 The telegram request does not meet the requirements of 10 CPR 9 2.714. It does not fact forth how tho.interecte 'af the writers in the proceeding may be affected by icouance-of the proposed licence. Nor does it state the writero' conton-tions in reasonably specific detail.

4. Applicant has no objection to limited appearances by the senders of the telegram pursuant to 10 CFR $ 2.715 Roopectfully Submitted, SHAW, PITTMAN , PO'ffS, TROWBRIDGE & MADDEN

'l I

By

/i

%). W 4 (. h/i

/

to/

/'

Gerald Charnoff e Attorney for Applicant Northern States Power Company April 2, 1970 e

> c 4

! e

' f ': ,

e 4

e 1 i ( 4