ML20127K617
| ML20127K617 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Monticello  |
| Issue date: | 05/17/1967 |
| From: | Engelhardt T US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9211200452 | |
| Download: ML20127K617 (3) | |
Text
~
n.
0 00x11 bl.L.
PROD. & UUL. IAC.
?',
t'J s
4 00Cittgp k
K!IC C
j MAY1719675 I-UNITED STATES OF AMERICA emn ers,,,%.l' hwshwme
'4 ATOMIC ENERGY C0!NISSION s
N-m In the Matter of NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY)
Docket No 50-2f3
)
(Ibnticello Nuclear
)
Generating Plant)
.)
(d REGUIATORY STAFF'D ANSWER
. TO PI rITION ^ FOR IEAVE TO INTERVDfE On April-21,1967, a notice of hearing on the applica-tion of Northern States Power Company (NSP) for a provisional construction permit to construct the Ibnticello Nuclear Generating Plant was published in the Federal Register (32 F.R. 6304). The notice provided that petitions for leave to intervene, pursuant to the provisions of $ 2.714 cf the Commission's " Rules of Practice," Title 10, Code of Federal Regulstions, Part 2, must be received in the Com.
mission's Public Document Room,1717 H Street,. N. W.,
Washington, D. C., not later than May 12, 1967.
/p
,q c,
1 9211200452 670517-PDR ADOCK 05000263 A
PDR g
(
s
_ Ia a letter dated W y 10, 1967, addressed to the U. S.
Atomic Energy Commission, Public Document Room,1717 H Street, H. W., Washington, D. C., Mr. John Pegora, 315 Tenth Avenue North, Hopkins, tilnnesota, stated that, pur-suant to $ 2 714 of the Commission's " Rules of Practice,"
^
he wished to intervene in the-hearing on the NSF application.
In this same-letter, Mr. Pegora also requested permission for Clear Air, Cicar Water Unlimited, "a local citizens group concerned with matters of public health and safety",
- to intervene in the proceeding.
Under $ 2.714 of the Commission's " Rules of Practice,"
10 CFR Part 2, a petition to intervene must set forth.the interest of the petitioner,in the proceeding, how that inter-est may be affected by Commission action,. and the contentions
~
of the petitioner.
The petitions for intervention of Mr. Pegors and on behalf of Clear Air, Clear Water Unlimited contained in Mr. Pegors' letter do not satisfy any of the requirements -
of $ 2.714 in that they are silent as to the interest;of the'
- petitioners =,' how that interest' may be affected by Commission -
action, and the contention ~of the petitioners.
1
,m
_.__.m_.;_,_
_m._
1 3
Accordingly, it is the regulatory staff's position that the petitions of Mr. Pegora on behalf of himself and of Clear Air, Clear Water Unlimited should not be granted unless and until his petitions meet the requirements of
$ 2 714 of 10 CFR Part 2.
Respectfully submitted, Ak,
. ')
wY~
Thomas F. Engel ardt e
Counsel AEC Regulatory Staff Dated at Bethesda, Maryland, this 17th day of May, 1967.
.