ML20127K106
| ML20127K106 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Calhoun  |
| Issue date: | 06/14/1985 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20127K110 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-285-85-07, 50-285-85-7, NUDOCS 8506270261 | |
| Download: ML20127K106 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000285/1985007
Text
i
-
-
.
,
,
,
"
"
Docket No. 50-285
.
.
FACILITY:
Fort Calhoun Station, Unit No. 1
LICENSEE:
Omaha Public Power District
EVALUATION PERIOD:
September 1, 1983 to February 28, 1985
PROJECT MANAGER:
Ed Tourigny
I.
INTRODUCTION:
This report contains NRR's input to the SALP review for the Fort Calhoun
Station, Unit No.1. The assessment of the licensee's performance was
conducted according to NRR Office Letter No. 44, NRR Inputs to SALP Process,
dated January 3, 1984. This Office Letter incorporates NRC Manual Chapter 0516, Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance.
II.
SUMMARY
,
.
NRC Manual Chapter 0516 specifies that each functional area evaluated will be
assigned a performance category (Category 1, 2 or 3) based on a composite of
a number of attributes.
The performance of the Omaha Public Power District
in the functional area of Licensing Activities is rated Category 1
~
III. CRITERIA
-
The evaluation criteria used in this assessment are given in NRC Manual
Chapter 0516 Appendix, Table 1, Evaluation Criteria with~ Attributes for
Assessment of. Licensee Performance.
.
\\
IV. METHODOLOGY
This evaluation represents the integrated inputs of the Operating Reactor
Project Manager (ORPM) and those technical reviewers who expended significant
amounts of effort on the Fort Calhoun Station licensing actions during the
current rating period.
Using the guidelines of NRC Manual Chapter 0516, the
ORPM and each reviewer applied specific evaluation criteria to the relevant
an overall rating category (tes, as delineated in Chapter 0516, and assigned
licensee performance pttribu1, 2 or 3) to each attribute.
The reviewers
included this information as part of Safety Evaluation Reports transmitted to
,
the Division of Licensing. The ORPM, after reviewing the inputs of the
!
technical reviewers, combined this information with his own assessment of
licensee performance and, using appropriate weighting factors, arrived at a
composite rating for the licensee. This rating also reflected the coments of
j
the NRR Senior Executive assigned to the Fort Calhoun Station, Unit No. 1 SALP
{
assessment. A written evaluation was then prepared by the ORPM and circulated
to NRR management for comments which were incorporated in the final draft.
1
1
.
.
,
,
y-e4-r
w,-my+
eme--g.m--
y-em--w.emyepwrpwee,w- w
-g-mM-7y-ya*y-t-
w+-g,,
g
_
.
_____ _
-
__--__
.
'
.
.-
-8-
Technical Supervisor.
This change allowed the QC personnel to have a higher
level of independence from the maintenance department.
The plant's technical
specifications were amended during the evaluation period to reflect these new
initiatives.
l
The licensee also implemented new staffing initiatives in their corporate
headquarters to further support the Fort Calhoun Station staff.
As an
example, additional resources were devoted to handle licensing issues.
Based on the above considerations, a rating of category 1 is assigned to this
attribute.
i
VI.
CONCLUSION
A complete performance rating of category 1 has been assigned by the NRR SALP
evaluation effort for the rating period.
!
!
i
'e
g
6
N
s
,
,
' '
t
s."
s
a
I '
(
. \\.
s
.
-
i3g
,
s
,
$
r
es
4
. . .
_
._
m
_ $