|
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20216C1841998-03-0202 March 1998 Comment Opposing Proposed GL Addressing Issue of Yr 2000 Readiness as Published in FR,980129,volume 63,number 19,pp 4498 Notice of Opportunity for Public Comment.Nsp Suggests That Draft Ltr Not Be Issued ML20199C2721997-10-27027 October 1997 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 73, Proposed Amends to NRC Requirements for Emergency Preparedness & Security ML20138K1511997-05-0606 May 1997 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to Nuclear Power Plant Security Requirements ML20117E4051996-08-0909 August 1996 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Rule ML20086T3861995-07-20020 July 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed NRC GL on Testing of safety- Related Logic Circuits ML20085E5261995-06-0606 June 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to NPP Security Requirements Associated W/Containment Access Control ML20077M6181994-12-30030 December 1994 Comment Re Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Low Power Operations for Np Reactors.Util Believes That Pr Will Have Higher Impact than Described in Regulatory Analysis,As Pr Will Extend Refueling Outages at All Plants ML20045G0941993-04-21021 April 1993 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50,52 & 100 Re Nuclear Power Plant Instrumentation for Earthquakes.Nothing Exists Between Monitor Recording Time & CAV Methodology ML20101F6861992-06-0909 June 1992 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR19 & 20 to Extend Implementation Date of Revised 10CFR20 ML20090J9581992-03-12012 March 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR51 Re Environ Review of Applications to Renew Operating Licenses for Nuclear Plants. Licensee Endorses NUMARC Comments ML20246D8811989-06-30030 June 1989 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components ML20235T7391989-02-23023 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants ML20195H4211988-11-18018 November 1988 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program Which Includes Random Drug Testing ML20205Q1501988-10-28028 October 1988 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re NUREG-1317, Regulatory Options for Nuclear Plant License Renewal. Safety Sys Functional Insps & Configuration Mgt Programs Support Renewal Basis as Opposed to Relicensing Process ML20247N7531988-07-28028 July 1988 Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-53 Requesting NRC Action to Review Undue Risk Posed by BWR Thermal Hydraulic Instability.Nrr Should Issue Order Requiring All GE BWRs to Be Placed in Cold Shutdown for Stated Reasons ML20210B8061987-05-0101 May 1987 Order.* NRC 861020 Order Directing Licensee to Show Cause Why OL Should Not Be Modified to Prohibit Use of Radios,Tapes,Television Sets or Other Audible Entertainment Devices Recinded & Proceeding Dismissed.Served on 870501 ML20211D0291987-02-13013 February 1987 Order.* Staff Directed to File W/Commission & Serve on Petitioners & Licensees Detailed Explanation of Health & Safety Basis for 861020 Order Re Use of Audio Equipment in Control Rooms by 870306.Carr Views Encl.Served on 870217 ML20214C4131986-11-12012 November 1986 Affidavit of DE Gilberts Re Enforcement Action 86-164 & NRC 861022 Order to Show Cause Concerning Use of Radios in Control Rooms ML20215J1421986-10-20020 October 1986 Order to Show Cause Why Radios or Other Electrical/ Electronic Equipment Used to Provide Background Music in Control Rooms Should Not Be Removed (Ref IE Info Notice 85-053 & Circular 81-02) ML18079B0851979-08-0202 August 1979 Request by Intervenors Coleman That ASLB Reconsider Dismissal of Contention 13.Intervenor State of Nj Supports Motion.Util Is Obliged Per 10CFR50 to Explore Alternatives to Spent Fuel Pool Expansion ML18079B0871979-08-0101 August 1979 Request by Intervenors Coleman That ASLB Reopen Record Re Contentions 2 & 6.Intervenor State of Nj Supports Motion. Experiences at Northern State Power Co Are Pertinent to Proceedings ML19261B2671979-01-26026 January 1979 Northern States Power Response to ASLB 790113 Memo & Order. Contends No Unresolved Safety Issue Re ATWS & Seeks Dismissal of Proceeding.W/Affidavit of DE Gilberts & Certificate of Svc ML19256A9111978-12-28028 December 1978 Licensee Requests Extension of Time Until 790126 to Submit Response to ASLB 781013 Order Because Necessary NRC Rept Has Not Yet Been Received.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20128A8141978-11-17017 November 1978 Order Granting Unopposed Motion for Extension,To & Including 790105,for Filing Reply to ASLB 781013 Order. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20150D1551978-11-0909 November 1978 NRC Staff Request for Extension of Time Re Preparation of Rept of Staff Views on Implications of & Requirements for Protec Against ATWS for Operating Nuc Pwr Plants ML20127N1031978-08-0808 August 1978 Amend 8 to Indemnity Agreement B-42 ML20127G6051978-06-19019 June 1978 Notice & Order Scheduling Prehearing Conference.* W/Certificate of Svc & Svc List ML20127G5851978-05-11011 May 1978 Order Granting Extension to & Including 780530 of Time for Filing of Answer to Joint Motion to Terminate Proceeding Filed by NRC Staff,Licensee & Mn Pollution Control Agency. W/Certificate of Svc & Svc List ML20127G5691978-04-13013 April 1978 Order Granting Extension to & Including 780430,of Time for Filling of Answer to Joint Motion to Terminate Proceeding Filed by NRC Staff,Licensee & Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ML20125B5841978-02-27027 February 1978 Order Dismissing Proceeding Due to Withdrawal of Mn Pollution Control Agency as Party.No Items of Controversy Remain ML20127L0241977-12-13013 December 1977 Notice of Hearing on Amend of Facility Ol.Proposed Amend Would Authorize Replacement of Existing Racks in Spent Fuel Storage Pool of Facility ML20127J4381977-12-13013 December 1977 Order Re Proposed Amend to Provisional Operating License DPR-22,authorizing Mod of Sfsp to Increase Capacity ML20127J3761977-10-31031 October 1977 Order Extending Time Until 771115 for Filing an Answer to Petition for Leave to Intervene by Mn Pollution Control Agency ML20127J2841977-03-11011 March 1977 Order Modifying License DPR-22 to Require Submittal of Reevaluation of ECCS Cooling Performance Calculated in GE Evaluation Model Approved by NRC & Corrected for Errors ML20127J3351976-11-16016 November 1976 Order Re Schedule for Completion of ATWS Compliance & Evidentiary Hearings on Outstanding Issues Re Facility ML20125A5031976-11-16016 November 1976 Order Re Stated Intervenor 750514 Addl Contention C.1 on Atws.W/Certificate of Svc & Svc List ML20125A4971976-05-11011 May 1976 Order Approving 760301 Stipulation Per Acceptance of 760507 Proposed TS Change on Radiological Releases.W/Certificate of Svc & Svc List ML20125A4881975-08-0505 August 1975 Memorandum & Order Re Stated Intervenor Motion on Atws.W/ Certificate of Svc & Svc List ML20127K9061975-04-0101 April 1975 Notice of Resumption of Public Hearing on 750506 in St Paul, Mn ML20127L0561975-03-24024 March 1975 Decision on Remand from Appeal Board.Denies Necnp Intervention in Proceeding to Amend License ML20127P5281975-03-11011 March 1975 Memorandum & Order Granting Petition for Leave to Intervene Filed by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Re Proposed Changes to Plant TS ML20125A4741975-03-11011 March 1975 Memorandum & Order Re 740722 Notice of Proposed Amend to License DPR-22 Concerning Prompt Relief Trip Sys ML20127M9351975-03-11011 March 1975 Notice of Hearing on Amend of License DPR-22.Amend Would Allow Operation of Facility Utilizing Prompt Relief Trip Sys Which Provides for Predetermined Number of Safety/Relief Valves to Be Actuated Promptly ML20127L2031975-02-21021 February 1975 Reconstitution of ASLB to Rule on Petitions to Intervene. Rf Cole Appointed Member of Board ML20125B4201975-02-0303 February 1975 Order Granting 750401 Request for Extension of Time to File Responses to Board 750127 Questions Re Environ Matters. Certificate of Svcs & Svc List Encl ML20127N5271974-12-27027 December 1974 Order Modifying License DPR-22 Re ECCS Evaluation Model Developed by GE ML20127H4831974-12-27027 December 1974 Order for Mod of License to Require Licensee to Submit Reevaluation of ECCS Cooling Performance Prior to Any License Amend Authorizing Any Core Reloading ML20127L1111974-12-20020 December 1974 Notice of Reconstitution of Board.Rf Cole Appointed as Member of Board ML20127M8371974-10-30030 October 1974 Order Postponing Starting Date of Evidentiary Hearing from 741106 to 1112.* ML20127L0071974-10-0404 October 1974 Notice & Order Convening Evidentiary Hearing in Proceeding on 741106 in Saint Paul,Mn 1998-03-02
[Table view] Category:TRANSCRIPTS
MONTHYEARML20127J1801970-04-0707 April 1970 Testimony of EC Glass Re Requirement for Power Production from Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant ML20127J2581970-03-26026 March 1970 Testimony of Gf Johnson Re Financial Qualification of Util for Provisional OL ML20127M4161968-02-0101 February 1968 Statement of Ja Lieberman Before Subcommittee on Science, R&D of House Committee on Science & Astronautics on 680201 ML20125B3741967-06-0101 June 1967 Applicant Proposed Corrections to Transcript.Certificate of Svc Encl 1970-04-07
[Table view] Category:DEPOSITIONS
MONTHYEARML20127J1801970-04-0707 April 1970 Testimony of EC Glass Re Requirement for Power Production from Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant ML20127J2581970-03-26026 March 1970 Testimony of Gf Johnson Re Financial Qualification of Util for Provisional OL ML20127M4161968-02-0101 February 1968 Statement of Ja Lieberman Before Subcommittee on Science, R&D of House Committee on Science & Astronautics on 680201 ML20125B3741967-06-0101 June 1967 Applicant Proposed Corrections to Transcript.Certificate of Svc Encl 1970-04-07
[Table view] Category:NARRATIVE TESTIMONY
MONTHYEARML20127J1801970-04-0707 April 1970 Testimony of EC Glass Re Requirement for Power Production from Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant ML20127J2581970-03-26026 March 1970 Testimony of Gf Johnson Re Financial Qualification of Util for Provisional OL ML20127M4161968-02-0101 February 1968 Statement of Ja Lieberman Before Subcommittee on Science, R&D of House Committee on Science & Astronautics on 680201 ML20125B3741967-06-0101 June 1967 Applicant Proposed Corrections to Transcript.Certificate of Svc Encl 1970-04-07
[Table view] |
Text
. __.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION In tne Matter of ,
NORTi! Eld STATES POWER COMPANY Docket No. 50-263 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant, Unit 1 4
APPENDIX B REQUIllEMENT FOR POWER PRODUCTION FROM MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLAllT i
l Testimony by E. C. Glass Manager of Planning Northern States Power Company 4
l April 7,.1970 9211190222 700412 "9r PDR ADOCK 05000263 G PDR
i i ;
! i . .
3
! Northern States Power Company (" Applicant") and its Wisconsin ;
5 i 1
subsidibry own and oTerate an interconnected system of high voltage l
1 r
! I transmission lines in Minnesota, Wisconsin, North = Dakota and South I
j Dakota which functions to transport electric power produced in various generating stations or received through interconnections with E t
! other power suppliers. The Applicant's system is part of an inter-
! state high voltage and extra high voltage (ERV) transmission system ,
i j owned by several utilities located in all or portions of. Illinois, i
! Indiana, Missouri, Iowa, Nebraska and Montana and, in 1970,~the province of.Manitnba in Canada. This' interstate system, in turn, is f
1 interconnected with similar systems beyond its Midwest area. . This
- total system, ' commonly referred to as a grid system, makes
- possible 1
the interstate purchase and sale of electric power between major
]
- power systems. These systems assist each other in times of emergency 1 -
by delivering large blocks of power over this- grid. By being able to
{
l rely on the grid system, a company can better cope with unusual 4
i j weather conditions or loss of generating equipment and thus greatly
- reduce the likelihood of experiencing power blackouts. The Monticello plant, as well as other generating plants, will contribute electric
- power to this interstate system.
l l High volume purchasers of electric power from NSP include the l
f ollowing . customers :
a .
l a. Honeywell, Inc., whose corporate headquarters are in l Minneapolis.- The company produces a wide variety of automatic con-trol instruments, makes guidance systems' for;the aerospace.and defense
~
1 I .-
i..
ev.-.,..-.- , , . - , ,...,,_,._m'm...A
, t- , . . . . ~ + ,. .# ,,.,...,#,...... .-r,--- v mmv...,
Y 1
' 2 4
market and is an important factor in the national computer industry.
It is the largest national producer of residential heating and air A
/'I conditioning control systems, which are marketed throughout the
, f
! United States, substantial portions of which are manufactured in l
l Minnesota. Its aerospace and defense work is concerned primarily
, with guidance and control systems for space vehicles, missiles, 5 manned aircraft and with weapons. A majority of its aerospace and 4
defense products are manufactured in Minnesota.
1 b. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., whose corporate headquarters are in St. Paul, Minnesota, and which produces a wide 2 list of products such as pressure-sensitive and gummed tape products,
' abrasives, adhesives, chemical products, graphic systems, etc., which are sold throughout the United States and elsewhere in the world.
- c. Northern Ordnance Division of.FMC Corporation, located in Minneapolis, Minnesota, and which manufactures heavy naval gun mounts and missile launchers, all of which are sold to the United States
)
Department of Defense, d
l
- d. Univac Division of Sperry Rand Corporation, located in St.
4 Paul, Minnesota, and elsewhere makes a complete line of electronic data processing systems for customers throughout the United States and elsewhere in the world, including several agencies of the United States and other governments.
- e. Northwestern Refining Company, whose hcadquarters are in i
_ =-- - , _ - - _ . - ._, .. _ _ ._ - .. . - _ . -
' 3 d
i St. Paul and whose major business' consists of the processing of petroleum products.
f
} f. Armour & Company, which operates a packing plant in South St. Paul and whose meat and meat products are processed in Minnesota.
i
- g. Cargill, Incorporated, whose corporate headquarters are
- in Minneapolis and whose products include salt, feed and grain.
- h. The newly formed Burlington Northern Inc. , whose corporate headquarters are in St. Paul, Minnesota, and which 4
provides railway transportation in the western half of the country.
The Monticello plant has been constructed in order to provide l additional electrical generating capability for the NSP syster.1, the need for which arises because of the increasing public demand for electricity.
A critical basis for determination of requirements for ad-ditional generating capability is the forecast .of system maximum demand. For the five-year period from 1964 through 1968, forecasts, l '
based upon median weather conditions, made the year before the j 2 actual occurrence of the system maximum demand range,d from approxi-mately 0.5% to 3% below the weather-corrected system maximum demand i
as it actually occurred. In 1969 the system maximum demand occured on l August 29th at 2873 megawatts (tme) , within about 1/3 of 1% of the ia %
s l
i
_r -- w+A a m-'5 m 6E..a -
4 .m. A'm-d -. eh. . L-a 4
I prior year forecast of 2883 mw.
In 1969, HSP forecast its 1970 system maximum demand to be 3140 mw, including an allowance of 75 mw for continued defense pro-duction activity. A reserve capability must be added to tho system maximum demand to allow for the unscheduled outage of generating
, facilities. By means of probability studies, the members of the Upper Mississippi Valley Power Pool (an association of power sup-pliers in the upper midwest) have determined that a minimum of 12%
reserve capability is necessary, assuming mutual assistance during emergencies being available through interconnections with systems outside the Upper Mississippi Valley Power Pool. This requirement adds 377 mw to the forecast of 3140 mw for a total capacity obliga-tion of 3517 mw in 1970.
Assuming that 460 mw(e) will be available from the Monticello plant, the Upper Mississippi Valley Power Pool is forecasted under
- expected weather conditions during the summer of 1970 to have 150 mw(e) of excess capability. NSP expects to be able to purchase the excess capability from other members of the power pool, but this would still leave a deficit of 310 mw(e) at expected wea t.hnr
'] conditions, if the Monticello plant is unavailable. Due t.o factors including delayed completion of other new generating units in the
, 4 midwest area and limitations upon capability of the midwest trans-
- \
i \,
mission system 310 mw(c) is not now available for purchase by
4 l
- 5 f Applicant for the summer of 1970 from outside the Upper Mississippi j
valley Power Pool to replace production lost at the Monticello i plant. Occurrence of unusually hot weather could increase the NSP load by 200 my above the forecasts which are based upon expected I
weather conditions. Without power production from the Monticello
, plant during the summer of 1970, the deficit facing NSP and its j
customers approximates 10% of the system maximum demand in normal
~
weather. If unusually hot weather occurs during the summer of 1970, the increased maximum demand would create a system deficit of about 15%, making more likely the need to curtail service to 1
customers if the Monticello plant is not in service.
d
)
1 i
f a
1 i
4 t
9
' 4.w ,
a
-ew-~ r- ,- --,,e,- w e-<--,--,m,r,-.,---c-n, y p- =
4 STATE OF MINNE! IOTA ) A FFIDAVI T_
) ss.
' COUNTY OF llENNEPIN )
E, C. GLASS, boing first duly sworn, on oath says that he is Manager of Planning of Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation, that he has read the forogoing statement of his testimony, and that the same is true and correct.
2 dxa E. C. Glass Subscribed and sworn to before me this 7th day of April, 1970. ,
aQ(_ ,fj el c14</
// .
PEARC 5. DUOGW
- t'chy Puthc, Hennepm County, Mlem, My Commeon Esp;res Juro 23.1971
/
(Notarial Seal) ,
e I
I e
l r