ML20127E148

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20127E148
Person / Time
Site: Palisades Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 08/31/1992
From: Ball G
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
FRN-57FR28645, RULE-PR-72 57FR28645-00025, 57FR28645-25, NUDOCS 9209160016
Download: ML20127E148 (1)


Text

__.y_.._._.___._.m._. . . _ . _ _ _ . _ . - . . _ . . _ _ _ _ . _ . . _ . . _ . _ . . _ _ . _ _ _ _ .

25  ;

occKET NUMBER PROPOSED RULE g- gy C57FR_216'/d 92 wG 31 ml:41

n. > w ,.oi.e DOCKt imb * '4 "#

BR ant,"

i

- &EEOKf 9 6

.. $ Ll,o 5,N.0 W TRhVE}2SE s F,W f To the_ Secretary of the_ Commission.

ITbf-I:am_ a Michigan resident opposed to dry cask storage of high-level nuclear _vaste at Palisades nuclear opwer plant .

.Without general'public notification or imput we have been _ ,

_Michigan, sited for a high-level vaste dump,150 yde. from Lake 1/$ the world's fresh water. This deadly waste.

cannot be stored safely anywhere, so ve vill most likely be will not be liable for these vastes if an interim site isa per not built by 1998, a date the Government Accounting Office states is unlikely. Therefore I ask for  ;

- 1. full democratic phocess 'in the ' crucial decision.

-3. 2. full public hearings' held in the sited area.-

an enviromenta1Limpact statement _ filed v the state'of Michigan. h the EPA and

4. a full cost / benefit analysis be' done e aming t cs of-nuclear power and examine'other' source . f en .-

,,,.;,c  ;+" "'

L 9209'160016 920916 57 28645- PDR j_ / O

o

..--,~,_ - , , , , _ . . ~ _ _ , , , -

,,.._r..__,., ___-+-

___r., , , - ._m.-_'