ML20127D874

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Safety Insp Repts 50-245/92-25,50-336/92-27 & 50-423/92-24 on 920908-1027.No Violations Noted.Inspector Noted Two Problems Which Enforcement Discretion Exercised. Also Noted That Response to Pin Hole Leak,Comprehensive
ML20127D874
Person / Time
Site: Millstone  
Issue date: 01/12/1993
From: Blough A
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Opeka J
NORTHEAST NUCLEAR ENERGY CO.
Shared Package
ML20127D878 List:
References
NUDOCS 9301190073
Download: ML20127D874 (3)


See also: IR 05000245/1992025

Text

/

. . (~

O

~.

'

'

~

)

.

J1]l 1 I: T3

Docket Nos. 50 245; 50-336; 50-423

hir. John F. Opeka

lixecutive Vice President-Nuclear

Northeast Nuclear Energy Company

P.O. Ilox 270

Hartford, Connecticut 06141-0270

Dear hir. Opeka:

SU10 ECT:

hilLLSTONE COh1BINED INSPECTION 50 245!92-25; 50-336/92-27; 50-

'

423/92-24

'

This refers to the safety inspection conducted by hir. P. Swetland of this of0cc on

Septemt'er 8,1992, through October 27,1992, at hiillstone Station in Waterford,

Connecticut. The preliminary findings were discussed with hir. S. Scace, the Unit Directors,

and others of your staff at the conclusion oi the inspection. Areas examined during the

inspection are described in the enclosed report. Within these areas, the inspection focused on

>

issues important to public health and safety, and consisted of performance observations of

ongoing activities, independent veri 0 cation of safety system status and design configuration,

interviews with personnel, and review of quality records.

Within the scope of this inspection, the inspectors noted two problems for which enforcement

discretion was exercised in accordance with Section Vll.B of the Enforcement Policy and no

violations were cited. Inconsistent reporting of fire barrier discrepancies among the hiillstone

units resulted in several missed Unit I licensee event reports. This minor problem was

promptly corrected by your staff. Unit I also reported on a potentially significant

degradation of the service water and emergency service water systems during this inspection,

lixternal corrosion of certain pipe connections rendered the system unable to meet the stress

requirements for a safe shutdown carthquake. Your initiative in finding and promptly

correcting this problem, as well as the absence of prior experience and programmatic

requirements which would have prevented its occurrence, justified the use of er.forcement

discretion for this incident. However, similar occurrences in the future may result in stronger

enforcement action. During this inspection, we also noted that your response to an identified

pin hole leak in the service water supply to the Unit 3 engineered safeguards building was

comprehensive and demonstrated a high regard for maintenance of system integrity.

We note that you have committed to develop and implement by February 1993 a

comprehensive service water and emergency service water maintenance and inspection

strategy. Because of the above noted Unit I_ system degradation, as well as the importance of

proper maintenance of these systems, we have a particular interest in this strategy.

Therefore, you are requested to inform us in writing of any changes in your planned

93o1190073 93o112

ADOCK 0500

S

QQ?gy g p

7

{DR

j

t(p

_-

.

._

F

e

s

Q

Northeast Nuclear linergy Company

2

schedule, as well as to send us a copy or summary of the stiategy within 30 days after it is

approved. The response requested is not subject to the clearance pmcedures of the Office of

Management and liudget as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Public law

No. 96.511.

Finally, some discrepancies were noted in your implementation of corrective actions for

previously cited violations, Management has not assured the proper attention to revised

measures, such as the Plant incident Report process, designed to improve the timeliness of

your response to plant problems We are concerned that this situation could detract from

your performance enhancement program initiatives to improve procedural adherence at the

station.

Your cooperation with us is appreciated.

Sincerely,

.. ,

.

.,

>

,.

A. Randolph Illough, Chief

Projects liranch No. 4

Division of Reactor Projects

linclosure: NRC Combined inspection Report 50-245/92-25; 50 336/92-27; 50-423/92-24

cc w/enel:

W. D. Romberg, Vice President - Nuclear, Operations Services

S. I!. Scace, Vice President, Millstone Nuclear Power Station

if, F. liaynes, Nuclear Unit Director, Unit 1

J. S. Keenan, Nuclear Unit Director, Unit 2

C.11. Clement, Nuclear Unit Director, Unit 3

R. M. Kacich, Director, Nuclear Licensing

-

D. O. Nordquist, Director of Quality Services

Gerald Garfield, lisquire

Nicholas Reynolds, lisquire

K. Abraham, PAO (2)

l'ublic Document Room (PDR)

local Public Document Room (LPDR)

Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSiC)

NRC Resident inspector

State of Connecticut SI.O Designee

l

l

l

GFFIC?AL EECdiD COPY

'

I

_ _ _ ,-_--

_, ._

-

_

_

_

_ _ , _

.

.

. .

. . . . . ,

.

-

.

.

Northeast Nuclear linergy Company

3

bec w/ encl:

Region 1 Docket Room (with concurrences)

J. Wiggins, DRP

J. Joyner, DRSS

J. Stolz, NRR/l'D l 4

R. lilough, DRP

l th>erflein,1)RP

W. Ruland, DRS

W. Raymond, SRI, lladdam Neck

P. Swetland, SRI, Atillstone

--

V. NicCree, Ol!DO

D. Jaffe, l'ht, NRR

G. Vissing, Phi, NRR

V. Rooney, Phi, NitR

DRS/lill sal.l* Coordinator

R. liarkley, DRP

Chief,11 llP, NRit (see section 7.3.4)

bec w/ Report Cover Sheet and lixecutive Summary only:

C. liehl, DRP

W, llodges, DRS

R. Cooper, DRSS

W.1.anning, DRS

1. liettenhausen, DRS

1). Ilolody,110

J. Durr, DRS

_

l llettenhausen, DRS

RI:DRR

RI:D1 P '

RI:DRP

g

CA

CP

l'g to -)1

g g)

'(h P.SWliTLAND

L.DOliRFLlilN

A.11 LOUGH

hD ' ht "

/ / /91

A i:A/ t/92

11/5/92

/ t '/ 2

/ f 7(43

OFFICIAL RE'00RD COPY

. _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -

_

_ _ _ _

_ - _________ _