ML20127D557

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards QA Program Insp Rept 99901010/85-01 on 850424. Program Implementation Could Not Be Fully Evaluated Because Contractual Agreements W/Gulf States Util Only Recently Finalized.No Vendor Qualification Deficiencies Noted
ML20127D557
Person / Time
Issue date: 06/20/1985
From: Zech G
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
To: John Miller
NUCLEAR PARTS ASSOCIATES (NUPA)
Shared Package
ML20127D560 List:
References
REF-QA-99901010 NUDOCS 8506240265
Download: ML20127D557 (2)


Text

r UNITED STATES

, Il NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g ., j WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

. e

%, ,, e JUN 2 0125 D:cket No. 99901010/85-01 Nuclear Parts Associates (NUPA)

P.O. Box 1399 ATTN: Mr. James I. Miller Site Operations Manager St. Francisville, Louisiana 70775 Gentlemen:

This refers to the inspection conducted by Mr. J. J. Petrosino of this office on April 24, 1985, of your facility at St. Francisville, Louisiana.

The purpose of this inspection was to review your methods of approving vendors for the NUPA qualified supplier list. Areas examined during the inspection and our findings are discussed in the enclosed report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of an examination of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector. Since contractual agreements between GSU and NUPA were not finalized until earlier this year, implementation of the NUPA program could not be fully evaluated.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of this letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room.

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.

Sincerely, h b l

Gary Zech, Chief Vendor Program Branch Division of Quality Assurance, Vendor, and Technical Trainiig Center Programs Office of Inspection and Enforcement

Enclosures:

1. Appendix A -Inspection Report 99901010/85-01
2. Appendix B -Inspection Data Sheets (2 pages) 4 Y$$o $h EA0.9,*,,

PDrt

JUN 2 01985 l

i Docket No. 999001010/85-01 Nuclear Parts Associates (NUPA)

P.O. Box 1399 ATTN: Mr. James I. Miller Site Operations Manager St. Francisville, Louisana 70775 Gentlemen:

This refers to the inspection conducted by Mr. J. J. Petrosino of this office on April 24, 1985, of your facility at St. Francisville, Louisana.

The purpose of this inspection was to review your methods of approving vendors for the NUPA qualified supplier list. Areas examined during the inspection and our findings are discussed in the enclosed report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of an examination of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector. Since contractual agreements between GSU and NUPA were not finalized until earlier this year, implementation of the NUPA program could not be fully evaluated.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Cuiamission's regulations, a copy of this letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room.

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.

Sincerely, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY:

GARY G. ZECH Gary G. Zech, Chief Vendor Program Branch Division of Quality Assurance, Vendor, and Technical Training Center Programs Office of Inspection and Enforcement

Enclosures:

1. Appendix A-Inspection Report 999001010/85-01
2. Appendix B-Inspection Data Sheets (2 pages) l l

DISTRIBUTION:

w DNB:IE:09 s JStone VPB Reading GHolahan, NRR/0RAB DQAVT Reading EMerschoff

. RVollmer JPetrosino JTCollins LVaughan BCBryan, GSUC

  • SEEPREVIOUSPAGESFORCONCURRENCES.g{

f

*VPB:0QAVT *SC/VPB:0QAVT C PB:DQAVT *DIR:DQAVT

! JPetrosino:gmk EMerschoff GZeph BKGrimes l

5/24/85 6/7/85 6/13/85 6/17/85 l