ML20127B546
| ML20127B546 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 06/20/1985 |
| From: | Irwin D HUNTON & WILLIAMS, LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CO. |
| To: | Asselstine J, Bernthal F, Palladino N, Roberts T, Zech L NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20127B550 | List: |
| References | |
| CON-#285-544 LBP-85-18, OL, NUDOCS 8506210521 | |
| Download: ML20127B546 (2) | |
Text
0}4
?
6-HUNTON & WILLI AM s 2000 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE. N.W.
P.O. Box 19230 to7E..? M.aN.tREET pO soms...
WASHINOTow D.C. 20006
,se....
vanue n't,
ta see ows' o ?se e, o sp o e, o ten so...e-ooe.
TE LE s.M o N E 202*955 1500 f tLEa 7 470s
"'l'"278/fi'.'**"
June 20, 1985 0X ETE P~
" ' ' ' * " "'" ^" ' " ' ' ' ' *
." ~;."a.;,
u.<-~.
,'; "' ',";/."!;".t.!'.!;.
usM c m.....,.
.g5 JUN 21 All :17..i;:;.'o::".";';;"lll*
- ."",:"C',":':
m................
...w,..< o.......
Nunzio J. Palladino, Chairman Commissioner James K. Asselstine hC N SY8 b Commissioner Frederick M.
Bernthal BRANCH Commissioner Thomas M. Roberts BY HAND Commissioner Lando W.
Zech, Jr.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1717 H Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
20555 Long Island Lighting Company (Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1)
NRC Docket 50-322-OL
Dear Chairman Palladino and Commissioners:
LILCO understands that the firm of Kirkpatrick &
Lockhart has served on you copies of a motion for a stay of the
. decision by the Licensing Board in LBP-85-18, authorizing issu-ance of a low power license for the Shoreham station.
LILCO has not yet been served with copies of these papers, but under-stands that, but for Mr. Lanpher's cover letter, they are sub-stantially similar to those filed with, and rejected by, the Appeal Board in a Memorandum and Order of yesterday's date.
On this understanding, LILCO submits herewith a copy of the oppo-sition it filed with the Appeal Board yesterday.
LILCO will amend its papers as necessary if and when served by Kirkpatrick
& Lockhart.
We understand that Mr. Lanpher's cover letter states that the Appellate Divison had today " lifted" the previous stay of Judge Doyle's decision.
While we have not yet received the series of housekeeping orders entered today by the Appellate Division,~we understand that that Courts (1) reversed Judge Doyle's denial of LILCO's intervention; (2) denied appellees' request that it decide the question of representation of Suffolk Countyr and (3) merely concluded that the normal provi-sion for an automatic stay pending appeal, without application therefor, did not apply in cases such as t
egg 6aiggg ggggg,2 cf
,a
r l4
' l IIt7xrox & WILLI AMM l
this where'both sides purport to represent the interest of a municipal corporation.
The substance of Judge Doyle's decision i
is, of course, on appeal now before the Appellate Division.
Respectfully submitted, p6($/ k L u ' i N ;,;, v C
Donald P.
Irwin Counsel for Long Island Lighting Company 91/gh l
Enclosures l
l' i
--_. ~. -_.
__._,__.,_,...m.,_.
_