ML20127A802

Responds to 850525 Request to Make Limited Appearance Statements at Reopened 850625 Hearing on Emergency Planning Proceeding.Board Will Not Take Limited Appearance Statements But Hearing Open to Public.Served on 850620

ML20127A802
Person / Time
Site:	Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date:	06/19/1985
From:	Margulies M Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
To:	Rosenfeld S LONG ISLAND COALITION FOR SAFE LIVING
Shared Package
ML20127A806	List: ML20127A802 ML20127A835
References
CON-#285-520 OL-3, NUDOCS 8506210265
Download: ML20127A802 (2)

Text

_ .__________ __

4 d l l June 19, 1985

, ils. Susan Rosenfeld gatggtp l l Long Islard Coalition For Safe Living UWC i Post Office Box 1355 l l

Massapequa, hew York 11758

'85 JM 20 P2:28 Re: Long Island Lighting Compa y l a sp (SherehamNuclearPowerStation, Unit 1, Docket.gggNhMA's"EN,,'

No. 50-322-OL-3 (Emergency Planning Proceeding) DOC i

BRMCH

Dear Ms. Rosenfeld:

This is in response to ycur letter of May 25, 1985 requesting the i opportunity to make limited appearance staterrents at the reopened hearing in the captierrd proceeding, now scheduled for Jur.e 25, 1985, at Hauppauge, flew York. A copy of your letter is attached in order that it will be served on the parties of record to the proceeding. You ask for ,

the opportunity for three merrbers of the Long Island Cealition for Safe Living to each make five minute statements. We are responding to ycur i request at this time because rulin on your Motier; to Intervene took precedence. That matter was resol ed by Memorandum and Order, dated  !

June 14, 1985.  !

The reopened hearing of June 25, 1985, is for the limited purpose i of determining whether the Nassau Veterans Memorial Coliseun is t functionally adequate to serve as a relocation center for the i anticipated general evacuees, resulting from a radiological errergency at l Shoreham. The hearing is close to completion. Hoarings on the ersergency planning phase of the Shorcham caso ccerenced in December 1902  :

and closed in August 1984, after a record of sorc 22,000 pages was  !

compiled.  ?!umerous limited appearance statements were heard at various  !

l times. The Licensing Board issued a 417 page )artial initial cccision '

on April 17, 1985, which treats with most of tie issues in the  ;

l proceeding.

i As a matter of policy, we would not be able to tako limited r appearance statements only from your three members. Me carnot proceed on such a restrictive basis. There would have to be a general taking of  !

statements. We do not believe it warranted under the circumstances of ,

the posture of the case and the nature cf your request. There are i active parties in the case who are concerr;ed with the interests of state and county residents and are expected to tdc an active part in the i proceeding on relevant issues. Considerirg all of the foregoing, the i 30ard will not be taking limited appearance statorents at the reopened proceedir.g. l

. yr 90 1

?

l _-

7