ML20126L832
| ML20126L832 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 12/22/1992 |
| From: | Norrholm L Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Tritch S WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, DIV OF CBS CORP. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20126L837 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900404 NUDOCS 9301080132 | |
| Download: ML20126L832 (2) | |
Text
.
o
/ UNITED STATES
.- ![omasc
, Q' C
'i \
- NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
$ E W ASHING TON. D. C. 20555 o ?
%,,,,* OTC 2 2 gq3 Docket No. 99900404 Mr. S. R. Tritch, Manager Nuclear Safety Department Nuclear and Advanced Technology Division Energy Systems Business Unit Westinghouse Electric Corporation Post Office Box 355 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230
Dear Mr. Tritch:
SUBJECT:
NOTICE OF NONCONFORMANCE (NRC INSPECTION REPORT 99900404/92-02)
This letter addresses the inspection of the Westinghouse Process Centrol Division (W-PCD) at Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, conducted by Messrs. R. C. Wilson, R. N. Moist, R. K. Frahm, Jr., and R. E. DePriest of this office on November 16-19, 1992, and the discussion of their findings with the general manager of W-PCD and members of your staffs on November 19, 1992. The purpose of the inspection was to review previous inspection concerns regard-ing the dedication of commercial grade components for nuclear safety-related applications and actions taken by W-PCD relating to 10 CFR Part 21 reports.
Areas examined during the NRC inspection and our findings are discussed in the enclosed report. This inspection consisted of an examination of procedures and records, interviews with per-sonnel, and observations by the inspectors.
The inspectors found that the implementation of W-PCD's quality assurance program failed to meet certain NRC requirements.
Specifically, in six instances W-PCD failed to document that possible changes to purchased commercial grade replacement parts being dedicated for safety-related use were controlled, identi-fled, or evaluated for safety implications. In four instances W-PCD. failed to maintain records of dedication test results, and in two instances W-PCD did not perform dedication activities in accordance with approved procedures. Although these are noncon-formances in your program which should be corrected affecting a total of 96 safety-related replacement parts, we-note that they are limited to documentation problems, and that W-PCD's dedica-tion program is now almost fully implemented.
The specific findings and references to the pertinent require- }
ments are identified in the enclosed Notice of Nonconformance (Notice).
,, ~r 7~/W - / 5 k' EIGN ID REfiWAif1RY CE!fIRfd. $,m[+
930, cam a2 92122e PDR GA999 ENVWEST RES A-%E '
99900404 PDR . _
Mr. S. R. Tritch The response requested by the enclosed Notice is not subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980,_Public Law No.96-511.
In accordance with 10 CFR Part 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosures will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room.
Sincerely,/
9 Leif J. Norrholm, Chief Vendor Inspection Branch Division of Reactor Inspection and Licensee Performance Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosures:
- 1. Notice of Nonconformance
- 2. Inspection Report 99900404/92-02 DISTRIBUTION:
Central Files / Docket File No. 99900404/ RIDS IE:09 VIC R/F DRIL R/F UPotapovs W. T. Russell w/ attachments OFFICE VIB/DRIL VIB/DRIL VIB/Dy VIgDgL SCVfBgRIL NAME RCWgp RNMoist RKFrNm RE b iest GCfdbna l
c DATE 12 / f6/92 12//7/92 12//$/92 12//6/92 12/M/92 COPY No Yes/h h No /No Yes@
l OFFICE BCVIy/DRIL DD/DRIL D/DRIL
- .. a NAME LJi 51m RZ ir^mdn [JRNgir l
y v.
DATE 12/tA/92 [jl2f) g/92 12/fQ92 COPY Yes/No OY esfio ) Ye Nh
! OFFICIAL RECORD COPY DOCUMENT NAME: PCD92RPT.
. .