ML20126L402
| ML20126L402 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Sequoyah  |
| Issue date: | 01/05/1993 |
| From: | Masnyk O, Mcguire D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20126L378 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-327-92-37, 50-328-92-37, NUDOCS 9301080029 | |
| Download: ML20126L402 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000327/1992037
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:_ _ SAFEGU ARDS INFORMATION ' p' ,, ,, ,I . g UNiit D ST Ait $ p) fg NUCLE AH nEGULAf onY cOMMisslON , o IM GION 11
- (,
- - 3 g 101 M AfdLT I A $1Ht t i. N.W. } f Af L ANT A.0LOHGI A 30373 o, %, . / ..... Report Nos. 50 327/92-37 and 50 328/92-37 Licensee: lennessee Valley Authority 3B Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50 328 License Nos. DPR 77 and DPR-79 facility Name: Sequoyah I and 2 Inrpection Conducted: December 7-11, 1992 O __ b N A kfJM!C- ~
- f_-f 4 -
'rysTaM.Masq/f 1 Inspector: k, 5afeguards becialist )atesfiiled Approved by: k>dsM / 73 Dav W k. EfGuire, ChTef Date~ Signed Safeguards Section Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards Branch Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards SUMMARY Scope: This routine, unannounced inspection was conducted in the area of the licensee's Physical Security Program for Power Reactors, Specific areas inspected were: Management Support; Security Plans; Auditst Protected and Vital Area Barriers, Detection and Assessment Aids; Protected and Vital Area Access Control; Alarm Stations and Communications; Compensatory Measures; Security Training and Qualification; and Safeguards Information. Additionally, the inspector reviewed the progress of the licensee's Security Upgrade Program. Results: During a review of licensee's records, the inspector found 12 examples of failures to protect Safeguards Information, see Paragraph 3. Additionally, the licensee failed to report seven of these to the NRC in the quarterly Safeguards Event Log required to be sent to the NRC quarterly. These twelve examples were apparent violations of 10 CFR 73.21 and 73.71. No additional violations were identified in the areas inspected. Management support for the security program was adequate. Implementation of changes to security plans was not fully effective in that in certain instances the changes implemented did not meet the full intent of the Plan. Audits of emewn%%e 9aososoo29 930103 C t3EGUARDS INFORMATION [.IO* ; ; O .";;7;l; L
gon noocx 03000227 omes. irm <s<e-t e mm4m; PDR _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _
. _ _ . _ _ _ .. _ _ _ _. _ _. _ _ _ _ . _ _ .- - ._ . , _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ . . . . - . _ . _ _ - _ ' SAFEGUARDS INFORMAT10N l 2 l i the upgrade program were adequate. Protected and vital area barriers were- ! maintained as required. Security training and qualification was very effective. l The licensee has completed approximately 43 percent of the security upgrade
and is proceeding on schedule. -{ i i 1 , I 'f 1 \\\\ J '! i s L i + ' I 4 .-i ! L u u
I t ~ o g ' t -L -i , +
! 1 > 1 l ~i
'~ l SAFEGUARDS INFORM. ATION - im-m m" ,.' ,,.. .,. '"' . eftkwen, INS L%@fnent in OM&ttdl 0 j f .' 0_- ,.; , - - . - - . . . . . . . . - - - . . . . . . - _,_ }}