ML20126L280

Discusses 921215 Mgt Meeting W/Util at Region II Office Re Self Assessment of Facility.List of Attendees,Meeting Summary & Handout of Slides Presented Encl

ML20126L280
Person / Time
Site:	North Anna
Issue date:	12/22/1992
From:	Merschoff E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:	Stewart W VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
References
NUDOCS 9301080006
Download: ML20126L280 (54)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:- ' 1y' DEC 221932 Docket Nos. 50 338, 50 339 License Nos. NPF-4, NPF-7 Virginia Electric and Power Company ATTN: Mr. W. L. Stewart Senior Vice President - Nuclear 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, VA 23060 Gentlemen:

SUBJECT:

MANAGEMENT MEETING

SUMMARY

- SELF ASSESSMENT OF NORTH ANNA POWER STATION This letter refers to the Mana n ment Meeting held on December 15, 1992, at the Region _II office.

The meeting concerned a self-assessment for your North Anna facility. A list of attendees, a meeting summary, and a copy of your handout are enclosed. In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 3, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and its enclo-sures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room. Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact us.- Sincerely, Original-signed by O'/004U Ellis W. Merschoff, Director Division of Reactor Projects

Enclosures:

1. List of Attendees ._ 2. Meeting Summary 3. Handout - Slides Presented cc w/ enc.ls:- M. L. _ Bowling, Jr., Manager Nuclear Licensing Virginia Electric & Power. Company 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, VA 23060.- cc w/encls cont'd: See.page 2 l ]ghf:[J, 93010888cko$o$$$as {DR-PDR-

t i o i Virginia Electric & Power 2 Company ec w/encls cont'd: j G. E. Kane, Station Manager North Anna Power Station P. O. Box 402 l Mineral, VA 23117 l Executive Vice President Old Dominion Electric Cooperative 4201 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen VA 23060 j Dr. W. T. Lough Virginia Corporation Commission Division of Energy Regulation i P. O. Cox 1197 Richmond, VA 23209 j William C. Porter, Jr. County Administrator Louisa County P. O. Box 160 Louisa, VA 23093 l Michael W. Maupin, Esq. Ilunton and Williams Riverfront Plaza, East Tower 951 E. Byrd Street Richmond, VA 23219 Attorney General I Supreme Court Building 1 101 North 8th Street' Richmond, VA 23219 Robert B. Strobe, M.D...M.P ll. State 11ealth Commissioner Office of-the Commissioner Virginia Department of llealth P. O. Box 2448 Richmond,-VA 23218 bec w/ enc 1: See page 3 - i a y + w',.,, an.-- ,'e--- ,-,.1, ,...i,..,,, nm , n'.

I 4 i e DEC 22 EXI! l Virginia Electric & Power 3. Company-bec w/ encl: P. Fredrickson, RII L _Cngle, NRR Document Control Desk NRC Resident inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission } Route 2, Box 78 A Mineral, VA 23117 NRC Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Route 1 Box 166 Surry, VA 23883 i } L i P 9 Ril:DRP Ril:DRP 1: P /AA. tMi D ARbff HSinkule choff t .EMp/ 12/po/92 12/p:/92 JE 2 G:NAMTSUM.D21 [ ['

.i .;It

! l :<;,!I!i1,:!l

,f I,li>li ,l: lfi!! N O m IT r A 2 e TT 9 w SN9 o RE1 EM5 P WS1 3 .a O SR E E E RU t PS S C B L .m AS CN N AM E E g NF C r AL c.i E E V HSD TR O N 8

' i l1

)' .i::1!il ,!!il!1l<

i ) l sno i t a r r e e p w N O On r o I o a P Tl e n Cac l UD 'H u a O.N i O t s t i iPt g T.n r N Je d i I is V erP ec iV e

k ) AGENDA Introduction J. P. O'Hanlon l l Performance Review G.E.Kane SelfAssessment J. A. Stall State of Quality J. P. Smith = Safety Assessment L. M. Girvin Conclusions J. P. O'Hanlon

-f ~ 4 l Virgittia Power i l i i t i i i l ( i { i STATION PERFORMANCE REVIEW i G.E.Kane 4 Station Manager i

4 i e l XORTH ANNA PERFORMANCE INDICATORS l l-i l LUnit Capability Factor Unplanned Capability Loss Factor i i Unplanned Automatic Scrams EDG Availabilty l ChemistryIndex l t Collective Radiation Exposure i l 5 g'- w -r---s 2 ee y w g-e-t w gp-- .-y--:-- g g-ysu-%u-g -t--

1 j l. NORTH ANNA POWER STATION UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR (THREE YEAR AVER AGE) l i M 82.2 89 83.5 82 ] 80A 80 80 M - 1591 Iratusev 4 Average -7b% 70 - a-3 50 - E UNIT 1 i EE 40 - E UNIT 2 n. 20 - 10 - j 0 I I I I I 1989 1990 1991 1992* 1995 I

• Year End Projectica INPO GOAL l

l 2 i 6 NORTH ANNA POWER STATION i UNPLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR (THREE YEAR AVERAGE) I8# 16.9 ( 16.00 - f E Unit 1 i 3 14.00 - O Unit z ( 12.00 - i e g 10.00 - ( y 1991 Imiscy f g.00. Average - 8.6% i 6.5 6.00 - t a 0.4 0.6 O.00 l I I I I 1989 1990 1991 1992* mt INPG' GOAL

• Year End Projection j

i i L

i 1 i t NORTH ANNA POWER STATION i UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC SCR AMS l (THREE YEAR AVER AGE) 4 420 4 34 350 - l 1 E Unit 1 I 3A0 - f O rosi2 l D u = 2AO ' - l l 1.7 i 1991Inas:ry g 138 - Armge-la j [ 1 1 ~ t the - s = i

p;[sh Y

g 8.3 th l OA0 1 1 [ [ 19so 1990 1991 199:- 2995 ' Year End Prvjectka BTO GOAL f i [ l f t t i I f

e NORTH ANNA POWER STATIOM EDG AVAILABILITY (THREE YEAR AVERAGE) i 1 ans ) 0.99 N eS85 0.9R2 e. o.95 1 1 1 i 1989 1999 1991 1992* 1995

• YEAR END PROJECTION

4 0 4 i hb [ s* l 1a O il I T M l l 1 1 1

1. y s%gg a

...., r,. ms U N-f D M N - '% ww) sai f g n E D CC M, WL...~ ._mm me x y N C = Z hg l s ma M l 3 j- ~ 4 g Z 5 5-M]W#Bf7 Z a l Y O O W ai ,l =$ M' z O n n a n a n = O C O O O angeA xapul 1

i \\ l NORTH ANNA POWER STATION 1 1 COLLECTIVE RADIATION F,XPOSURE i (THREE YEAR AVERAGE) 250 l 227 l. _ 19921rdustry l Average - 216 200 -- - 185 l 182 150 -- 100 - I i i 50 -. -{ l t 0 I I I I i 1989 '1990 1991 1992* 1995 ' Year End Projec&o INPO GOAL l I 1 i I

North Anna Performance Annunciator Windows Third Quarter 1992 ERA N MAINTENANCE P AP E m I IM i I i I I ii m i i I i i KE S E SYSTEM REACTOR ESF FUEL ACmmNS RMM P e CON N A EQUIPMENT PERFORMANCE N l NET GENERATION [ THERMAL PERFORMANCE I I I i STE OPERATING MAINTENANCE ENG NG PROGRAM PROGRAM SAFETY PROGRAM REGULATORY INDUSTRfAL ASSESSMENT PERFORMANCE PERFORMANCE SAFETY AND OU PROGRAM PROGRAM R f ADHERENCE TO PROCEDURE I NUCt. EAR PROGRAM SAFETY POUCY l l l LEGEND RED E -SIGN!FICANTWEAKNESS I*I*'"I YELLOWD -IMPROVEMENT NEEDED mao ouARTEnies: WHITE O -SATISFACTORY GREEN E -SIGNIFICANTSTRENGTH

4 REGULATORY PERFORMANCE i CURRENT SALP PREVIOUS SALP l-LERS. 32 37 CITED VIOLATIONS-13 12 . As of December 3,1992 6 of 32 LERs attributed _ to the-aggressive ongoing I 3 Technical Specification surveillance requirement j . reviews. 't 4 .3 4 r,,,

+ North Anna Steam Generator Replacement Project Goals Goal Current Estimate ALARA 500 Man-Rem 480.7 Man-Rem Licensing 10CFR50.59 10CFR50.59 l Schedule 120 Days 110 Days i i l Cost $185 Million $142 Million Safety 4.5 OSHA Rate O to Date L b -w

h i1 [

il e

t I TN r r E eg e M a S n w S a o E M l Sl P Sano AtSi a F.ta i LAt n E.S i Jt S g n r N a t i O s V I is T s A A TS ,,i i - 1 ull i . i

North Anna Performance i ACCOMPLISHMENTS a i OPERATIONS Human Performance improvement. Plan /Results Outage' Safety Attitude Licensed Operator Staffing and Experience e '- Effective Operator Response Safe and Reliable Reactor Operation ~ Few' Reactor Trips Station Housekeeping

• - Switchyard Control

[ D Xorth Anna Performance ACCOMPLISHMENTS OPERATIONS

• Improved Procedures:

Implemented the Electronic PAR Process (E-PAR) Established Procedure Writing Station in TSC 'On Shift Procedure Writer - 24 Hour Coverage 1 Writer per Shift Ass.igned to the SRO On Shift Procedure Writers are Licensed Reactor Operators - All Procedure Changes made by E-PAR Process

• Continued improvement in Computer Based Information Systems

.a e. i North Anna Performance l ACCOMPLISHMENTS MAINTENANCE / SURVEILLANCE ' Plant Materiel Condition and Housekeeping Low Forced Outage Rate (0.7%) Consistently Low Reactor Coolant System Leakage Low Tolerence for System Leakage Low Backlog and Low Average Age of. Work Orders 480 VAC Part 21L Klockner Moeller Breaker Change Out on Line Turbine Throttle Valve Repair on Line Enhanced Operation '& Maintenance Interface (Tagging Office) instrument and Calibration PAR Reduction e 1

.N-North Anna Performance ACCOMPLISHMENTS MAINTENANCE / SURVEILLANCE Detailed T.S. Surveillance Review RTD Manifold Removal. Scheduled = IST Program Change Management Reviewed by SNSOC l . Post Maintenance Testing Program . Reliability Centered Maintenance. Program Root Cause Evaluation Program'(e.g. failed feed reg valve cards, MSTV rupture discs) CheckValve Reliability Program Outage: Shutdown Safety Perspective

E i North Anna Performance l ACCOMPLISHMENTS ENGINEERING / TECHNICAL SUPPORT Management involvement in Issues: Responsiveness to Operational Needs Effective Contingency Plan for Replacement of Battery 2-IV Cells Proactive ' Approach to Resolving Difficult Problems ~ (e.g. AFW. response time testing) IPE Response at North Anna Microbiological induced Corrosion Program j e Eliminated Procedure Backlog Resulting from j Plant. Modifications l 1

e-= { North Anna Performance D 4 ACCOMPLISHMENTS ENGINEERING / TECHNICAL SUPPORT Training Program Effectiveness Operations 100% Pass Maintained Accreditation EDSFI Follow-up Demonstrated Significant - Progress on issues Motor Operated Valve Configuration Control and Differential Pressure Testing Program Engineering Work Well Coordinated with Station Maintenance to Support Planned and Emerging Work ~ b,.u i--w_,. _.2__,:u-. wr 4.x_:__; _._v: b _a =wasm-u- -m.._- m- ..s-_=_:.r.:.m.: AU_- -n-- m. .m__..

w b North Anna Performance ACCOMPLISHMENTS RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION Management Support a RP Experience Level andTraining PCE Reduction Efforts Dose Reduction Efforts (SGR, RTD Bypass Modifications and working smarter) Source Term Reduction Respirator Reduction Efforts Contaminated Area Very Low-- Locked High Radiation Area Reduction / Reclamation-Housekeeping Early Boration and Lithium Reduction [

[ Xorth Anna Performance. ) -ACCOMPLISHMENTS RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION . Digital. AlarmingL Dosimeter Upgrade Le Template Radiation Work Permits . Industry Experience Enhancements New 10CFR20 Implementation Plan Radiological Protection Training - Contract and ARW Personnel . initiatives to Minimize Dose during Steam Generator Replacement (SGR): ( Distinct Radiological Protection Organization ~ - GET/ALARATraining for all SGR Personnel - Mock-up Training - Incorporated Lessons Learned From Other Utility SGR l - State c'f the Art Equipment' l h ~ v e

= O North Anna Performance ACCOMPLISHMENTS EMERGENCY PLANNING Management Support Emergency Planning - Successful Graded EP Exercise, including 4 Full Scale Drills 1 1 Maintained High State of Readiness of EP Equipment c' Developed Emergency-Action Level Basis Document-f ( ) r v r

p e ( D North Anna Performance l ACCOMPLISHMENTS SECURITY Management Support Training Facilities improvement - New Simulator Log Entries for Human Errors Well Below Region ll Average Equipment improvement: - New Card Readers - Main Security Computer System Replacement - Operational Secondary Portal for SGR - New Security Training Facility No Handgun Failures in 1992/ Raised Handgun I Qualification Average

North Anna Performance ACCOMPLISHMENTS SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND QUALITY VERIFICATION Management involvement in issues Station Oversight Board Meetings e Nuclear Safety Oversight for Normal and Shutdown Conditions Good Identification Of Generic Safety issues Integrated Event Trending QA Oversight of Operational Activities Effective Audit and Assessment Program QA involvement in SNSOC >n

PREVIOUS SALP IDENTIFIED CHALLENGES ' PLANT OPERATION Mispositioned Components - CORRECTED Improve Procedures - CORRECTED Address Adverse Trends in Operator Errors - CORRECTED Further Initiatives Being implemented MAINTENANCE / SURVEILLANCE IST Program Weaknesses - CORRECTED Review of Test Results - CORRECTED Missed or inadequate Surveillances - ONGOING e. -Backlog of Procedure Action Requests - CORRECTED RTD Bypass Manifold - SCHEDULED FOR NEXT OUTAGES e

PREVIOUS SALP IDE3 TIFIED CHALLENGES ENGINEERING / TECHNICAL SUPPORT Impact of Design Changes on Procedures - CORRECTED Technical Support for Procedures - CORRECTED e = Electrical Distribution Design Calculations - ON SCHEDULE 1 I e. Assuring Engineering Involvement in Problem Areas - CORRECTED e i.r-ri,-- y v-. w w , g,..,- 5.,

PREVIOUS SALP IDE3 TIFIED CHALLENGES RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS Maintain Level of Performance - ONGOING EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Maintain Level of Performance - ONGOING SAFEGUARDS Maintain Level of Performance.- ONGOING SAFETY ASSESSMENT / QUALITY VERIFICATION I ( Maintain. Level of Performance - ONGOING

PREVIOUS SALP IDENTIFIED CHALLENGES THAT REQUIRE ONGOING ATTE3TION Missed Surveillances Ongo,ing detailed line by line review of Technical Specifications (TS) will be completed by June 1993 The scope of the review includes procedures that demonstrate operability, maintain system line-ups, or implement channel functional tests or calibrations Team consists of SRO qualified, senior level Engineers Results of the review are maintained in a database that will augment the existing TS Cross Reference Document a - All missed surveillances have been reported to the NRC pursuant to 10 CFR 50.72, and when completed operability was demonstrated h

PREVIOUS SALP IDE:N TWIED CHALLENGES THAT REQUIRE ONGOING ATTE:STION Maintenance and Calibration Procedure Adequacy Maintenance / instrumentation Procedure Change Backlog has been Significantly Reduced Technical Procedure Upgrade Program is Well Ahead of the Goal (913 Complete vs Goal of 600) Electronic Procedure Change Process (E-PAR) has been a Implemented with a Dramatic Decrease in PAR Backlog (1717 to 122). and a Higher Quality Procedure for the ~ Craftsman

1_ PREVIOUS SALP IDENTIFIED CHALLENGES THAT REQUIRE ONGOING ATTENTION Maintenance and Calibration Procedure Adequacy Established Instrument Department Procedure Writing Station, Featuring Latest Computerized Technology, Allowing Direct Face to Face interaction with Craft Installing Same. Work Station for Mechanical and Electrical-Maintenance The Result is a Dramatic Reversal in the Status of Procedures at North Anna. The Procedures Area is now Considered a Station Strength i

w-h e. -e e NORTH ANNA POWER STATION I&C PAR BACKLOG [ (10/91 TO PRESENT) 700 616 600 - 4 500 -- i e_. 300.. 200 -- 100 -- N. 6 o E.: 4 E- ?- E E' ? ' y' E S-8^ j 'E 1 E A,S [ A R Z R' '8 e .e ) I 6 n ww w 4 r W4-w

g e - e 6 NORTH ANNA POWER STATION PAR BACKLOG (10/91 TO PRESENT) 2000 -- 1717 1500 -- 3000... I $Qo.. 122 1 0 l l l l l l l l l l l l l. l s a-e y a = a a a 3 -i 8 4 2. i. it L w 2 g m a 5 i-z-

z l

l'

-r----,---- m -,--w,, w h h e XORTH ANNA POWER STATION I&C TPUP UPGRADE (10/91 TO PRESENT) = [ 706 -- .go -500 -- 481 ' y-- m. 100 -- 0 l l l l l l l l l l l l -?- ? - ? ? '?- ? 4. ? ? ? R g a i 6. j i 32 5~ .F

t. -

3 h. P' z 5-a g a. z M...

a..a.___, -r -s_ a,- ^@ i i NORTH ANNA POWER STATION TECHNICAL PROCEDURE UPGRADE-PROGRAM (10/91 TO PRESENT) 2500 -- 2391 1 2000 '-- 1478 1500 - 1000 -- l 500 -- i 0 l l l l l l l l l l l 5 - ?- ?. ? . g: ? 2 g' s g-L t: - i . r$' 3-j! t.. F i k 6 ~s-4 o 2 m f_ f ". ~ + g 9 i +s-y g c -] e yb a--c i- - w o-w'-v .p

PREVIOUS SALP IDE:5 TIFIED CHALLENGES THAT REQUIRE OXGOING ATTENTION Reduction in Human Performance Based Problems Utilized QA. Organization to Provide Oversight of OperationalActivities During High Risk /High Activity Levels i of Outages- ' Develope.d Extensive Human Performance Improvement Program in Operations Department I Used Consultant Dr. Allan Swain to Evaluate Human -- Performance improvement Program

• -Requested and Received an INPO HPES Assist Visit and incorporated Recommendations i.

l f y p a-L- ( my, :- ,p: yd

k-PREVIOUS SALP TDE3 TIFIED CHALTRNGES THAT REQUIRE ONGOING ArrKSTION Reduction in Human Performance Based Problems Modified / improved Supervisor Managerial Methods to Reduce Potential for Human Events identified by QA I Expanded QA Independent Verification Assessments to Departments OtherThan Operations on an As Needed Basis i i Human Performance Trends / indicators are Routinely e Shared with all Operators ~ j TheT lit is a Substantial Reduction in Human Performance issues at North Anna and is Now Seen as a j Station' Strength i. l e

0 m Q) N e d Q k b$$ ope a e [A Cf) &W hiM k 4 y b b 5 ( ) l ______________._.-_-._____.____-_---._-_-m_

m PROACTIVE QUALITY ASSURANCE Analyzing Trends to Provide Early Detection i of Problems i Monitoring for Effective and Timely Corrective Actions i Getting Out of Inline QA - Une Accountable for 4 [ Quality 1 Assessing Performance l i Determining Overall State of Quality W 9 ~

j r I State of Quality Audit Findings / Observations 80 - 72 60 40 26 15 20 g N 0 ~ Organintion Program / Iluman Equi;mient/ Process Performance Facilides ) Audit Enhancements 20 - 15 10 6 4 4 O I O .......... g g _ gM _ Organistion Program / Ifuman Equipment / Process Performance Facilities Audit Strengths 14 14 13 0- -~ ~ ~ Organintion Program / Process iluman Performance Equipment /Facilides M Previous Period M current Peri x1 L J e

1 i t I l STATE OF OUALITY I METHODOLOGY ASSESSMENT RESULTS 4 \\ j FULLY ACCEPTABLE I-- L2 1.2 1.3 sk ~ i

5. -.f j

3.c., g3 x._ i fc g7 j ny < g" g,7 y k; i .=-a ?-I:$y ~[j;cf,

s;;

ACCEPTABLE 2-- -M ~ M E7" 1 ~",.' g 2.2 g; 9-. + w. _ .c E PREVIOUS SALP

k

,[ w; p[~ ,} ;. ) .g: ; + O CURRENT SALP 4 1,j [h g '^, p:: Pi.-Mh' i UNSATISFACTORY 3-- h 9 19 :. l g l .: ; W l $E; ~s. 4:e ^ ~ w.

s.

y - }?.;. p -L ?:-l UNACCEPTABLE 4-I I -4 OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE RADIOLOGICAL INTUSTRIAL PROTECTION SAFETY i

o h ( D STATE OF OUALITY h CONCLUSIONS Maintain Management Focus on Human Performance Strong Management Focus on Resolving issues and l l Addressing Assessment Results i Superior Condition of Equipment and Facilities t i Personnel are Skilled and Knowledgeable f 1 4

jl c

!I! ~ \\ s e c iv r T re e N S w E n r Mia o Srle v P Sic EGu a S .N SM-i n A yt Yrn i re g Tad r ELi i F se V A r S P ec iV .i ll 1i: lji c ii

s, m-4. w 2 h l h !bf gli I))t 3 a b ~ 33f3 e j Dg'TT I Eg I N k: I Q Q h ~~

• 2 y >

1 i j i 11 o O Ill j j h a > a .mJ S sh e lb.lili .w

• i hl l[i il-O i j YZ l

l hv pu m. u l l. yy..-.- m- --.g9 ,+n,-*.,,.wyy.,,e ,r. ,w ws,w. ,.r9 .w. p ...-c.

Performance Based Assessments Conducted In 1992 Shutdown Management Post Maintenance Testing i i e Safety Evaluations <l Switchyard l Environmental Qualification Program j Appendix R Start-Up Assessment Process i Electrical Distribution Engineering Change Control i i I L L

Significant Event Reviews Reauested By Station Management In 1992 Unit 2 Chiller Failing To Trip At Surry e. 480V Motor Control Fire At North Anna GETARS Utilization e Condenser Waterbox Opening Transposition At North Anna

I Other Corporate Oversight Activities

• Integrated Event Trending Program
• Back Shift Management Assessments And Simulator Observations l

l

• Review Of NRC Violations At Other Utilities
• UFSAR Operational Review At Each Station
• QA Audit Program

4. r Licensing Performance t l No Commitments to NRC have been missed in the Current SALP Period The North Anna UFSAR Backlog has been eliminated L The Number of License Amendment Requests Currently at NRC is Low (6) The Number of Temporary Waivers of Compliance [ Requested is Low (2) Significant Licensing issues are Highly Visible-l Through the Top 10 Priority List i .Significant Licensing Tasks have been Accomplished i in a Timely Manner

~ Licensing Performance No commitments to NRC have been missed in current SALP period. The e number of deferred commitments is low and declining (5 in 1991,3 in 1992). The North Anna UFSAR backlog is being eliminated. The backlog was highest in May 1991 with 61 items, reduced to 36 items at the beginning of the current SALP period and will be 0 by December 31,1992. The number of' license amendment requests currently at NRC is low: e '6. NRC issued 19 amendments for North Anna 1 and 14 amendments for North Anna 2 since the SALP period began in November 1991. Only one emergency and one exigent Technical Specification change'(for North Anna i only) were requested. Both were approved by NRC. The number of-temporary waivers of compliance requested is low: 2. One ' involved turbine throttle valve testing, the other involved AFW pump relay response testing. Both were for North Anna 1 only and were granted by l NRC. Significant.11 censing issues are highly visible through the top 10 priority list. The. Top 10 North Anna Licensing Task system effectively identifies licensing issues important to both NRC and Virginia Electric and Power Company. Significant licensing tasks have been accomplished in a timely manner. Examples include NRC startup approval (March '92) and issuance of two license amendments (Feb '92) supporting-the startup of North Anna 1 following an unplanned outage in Dec. '91,.the replacement of North Anna 1 Steam Generators under.10CFR50.59, and the restoration of portions of the-Service Water system in accordance with NRC-approved exemptions. E

l\\ \\ii l! l1 l

~

~ sno it i ar r e e p w S O Nn r o o Ol a P I n e l Sac a UHu L 'O N . i m C NPt v n g O.e J r C d . i is V erP ec iV I f\\ \\l1 ll Ill Il1 {L}}