Text

App B to Rev 1 to Procedures Generation Package for Hope Creek Generating Station, Consisting of Work Plan for Emergency Operating Procedure Verification & Validation at Hope Creek Generating Station
	ML20126L162
Person / Time
Site:	Hope Creek
Issue date:	07/31/1985
From:	; ESSEX CORP.
To:	;
Shared Package
ML20126L145	List: ML20126L143; ML20126L146; ML20126L154; ML20126L162;
References
	PROC-850731, NUDOCS 8507310087
	Download: ML20126L162 (112)
	v • d • e

O APPENDIX B WORK PLAN FOR CDP VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION l

i f

8507310007 850729 PDR ADOCK 05000354 PDR E

WORK PLAN FOR EOP VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION AT NOPE CREEK W NERATING STATION Prepared by Essex Corporation for Public Service Electric & Cas Company July 1985 I

r~

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 IIFIRODUCTION

.1-1 1.1 Purpose 1-1 1.2 Scope 1-1 2.0 TECHNICAL VERIFICATION 2-1 2.1 Objec tive 2-1 2.2 Applicability 2-1 2.3 Summary of Method 2-2 2.4 Personnel 2-2 2.5 Facilities / Materials 2-4 2.6 Specific Instructions for Performing Technical Verification 2-4 2.7 Specific Instructions for Performing Partial Technical 2-5 Verification 2.8 Technical Verification Checklist 2-6 3.0 EDITORIAL VERIFICATION 3-1 3.1 Objective 3-1 3.2 Applicability 3-1 3.3 Summary of Method 3-1 3.4 Personnel 3-2 3.5 Facilities / Materials 3-3 3.6 Specific Instructions for Performing Editorial Verification 3-3 3.7 Specific Instructions for Partial Editorial Verification 3-3 of a Procedure 3.8 Editorial Verification Checklist 3-4 4.0 VALIDATION 4-1 4.1 Objective 4-1 4.2 Applicability 4-1 4.3 Summary of Methods 4-1

TABLE OF COffENTS (Continued)

Page 4.4 Selection of Validation Method 4-2 4.5 Specification of Scenarios 4-3 4.6 Personnel 4-4 4.7 Facilities / Materials 4-6 4.8 Specific Instructions for Performing Simulator Validation 4-7 4.9 Specific Instructions for Performing Walk-through Validation 4-8 4.10 Validation Forms 4-9

5.0 ASSESSMENT

AND RESOLUTION 5-1 5.1 Objectives 5-1 5.2 Personnel 5-1 5.3 Materials 5-1 5.4 Methods 5-2 5.5 Assessment and Resolution Forms 5-3

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Purpose This Work Plan defines the process that will be used to implement the Emergency Operating Procedure Verification and Validation (EOP V&V) Program, as described in Hope Creek Generating Station's Procedures Generation Package (December 1984). This plan is modeled after the guidelines for E0P verifi-cation and validation developed under the sponsorship of the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO-83-004, March 1983; and INPO 83-006, July 1983).

It is consistent with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's guidance for EOP preparation contained in NUREG-0899 (August 1982).

1.2 Scope The Work Plan addresses the following V&V activities:

o Technical Verification (Section 2.0) o Editorial Verification (Section 3.0) o Validation (Section 4.0) o Assessment and Resolution (Section 5.0).

Each activity is defined in terms of objective, method, personnel needs, facilities / materials,' and specific instructions for performing the activity.

This Work Plan will be applied to all E0Ps for Hope Creek Generating Station, as listed below:

o OP-EO.ZZ-099, Post-Scram Recovery o OP-EO.ZZ-100, acactor Scram o OP-EO.ZZ-101, Reactor / Pressure Vessel Control o OP-EO.ZZ-102, Containment Control o OP-EO.ZZ-103, Reactor Building Control OP-EO.ZZ-104, Radioactivity Release Control o

o OP-EO.ZZ-201, Level Restoration o OP-EO.ZZ-202, Emergency Depressurization o OP-EO.ZZ-203, Steam Cooling o OP-EO.ZZ-204, Spray Cooling o OP-EO.ZZ-205, Alternate Shutdown Cooling 1-1

o OP-EO.ZZ-206, Reactor Flooding o OP-EO.ZZ-207, Level / Power Control.

1-2

2.0 TECHNICAL VERIFICATION 2.1 Objective The objective of technical verification is to ensure that the E0Ps accu-rately reflect the generic BWROG Emergency Procedure Guidelines (EPGs), the.

Hope Creek Plant-Specific Technical Guidelines (PSTGs), and other E0P source documents. Technical verification will include:

o Verification of the correctness and completeness of the plant-specific information merged with the generic guide-lines.

Verification of the compliance of the resultant EOPs with o

the generic guidelines from which they were developed, Verification of the compliance of the EOPs with applicable o

operating, system, and administrative procedures.

Technical verification will also address the objective of ensuring that the level of information detail provided in the EOPs is consistent with the qualifications, training, and experience of the operating staff.

(This objec-tive will also be addressed in other activities of the E0P V&V Program.)

2.2 Applicability The verification process will be performed on all procedures before their approval for use.

In addition, should an approved procedure be completely rewritten, the complete verification process will be performed on the rewrite.

When a step, subsection, or attachment to an approved procedure is changed, verification steps will be performed as necessary to ensure:

(a) that procedure changes accurately reflect technical source data; (b) that the plant-specific technical guidelines are maintained up-to-date; and (c) that all procedure changes are written in accordance with the Writer's Guide.

The instructions given in Section 2.6, 2.7 cover verification of entire procedures and verification of partial changes separately.

R-JL

2.3 Summary of Method Technical verification is a " tabletop analysis" activity.

It will be done by comparing each procedure to the applicable EPG and PSTG, and to data from other sources such as the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR).

Revision 3 of the EPGs will be used. OP-EO.ZZ-101 through 104 were developed based on Revision 3 of the principal EPGs.

OP-EO.ZZ-201 through.207 were developed based on Revision 3 of the contingency guidelines.

The BWROC EPGs do not separately address Post-Scram Restoration and Reactor Scram, which are covered by Hope Creek E0Ps OP-EO.ZZ-099 and 100.

Technical verification in those cases will refer to other source documents that provide the EOP bases.

(The EPG for RPV Control does include reactor scram and will be used in the verification of that EOP.)

A checklist will be used to ensure that key points of comparison are covered consistently. Any apparent discrepancies will be documented, and asse ssed and resolved as described in Section 5.0.

2.4 Persoanel The following types of personnel will participate in the technical veri-fication of the E0Ps. Minimum qualifications and responsibilities are listed for each personnel category identified:

1.

V6V Coordinator

a. Qualifications:

Experience as s Senior Reactor Operator and/or currently in the SRO license training program at Hope Creek Gen-erating Station Thorough knowledge of the EOPs and associated documen-tation Thorough knowledge of plant systems Authority to schedule technical verification activities and assign duties to personnel.

b. Responsibilities:

Schedule activities, facilities, and personnel Ensure that copies of E0Ps, reference documents, and materials are available Conduct preverification briefings to explain the overall purpose of the E0P V&V Program and the specific process of technical verification 2-2

Coordinate and participate in technical verification activities Ensure that all documentation of activities is properly completed, filed, and distributed.

2.

Technical Evaluators (minimum of 2 for each procedure in addi-tion to the V&V Coordinator; they will be personnel who did not participate in writing the procedure)

a. Qualifications:

One will have experience as a Senior Reactor Operator and/or will be currently in the SRO license training pro-gram at Hope Creek Generating Station.

One will have experience as a Reactor Operator and/or will be currently in the RO license training program at Hope Creek Generating Station.

b. Responsibilities:

Perform technical verification in accordance with Work Plan Perform other duties related to technical verification as directed by V&V Coordinator.

3.

Other evaluator

a. Qualifications (must meet one of the following)

Training department personnel Knowledge of the E0Ps and associated documentation o

o Thorough knowledge of plant systems Familiarity with the Procedures Generation Package and o

E0P V6V objectives and requirements.

Human Factors Specialist o

M.A./M.S. in human factors discipline Two years experience in application of human factors o

in nuclear power industry Experience in procedures development and/or conduct of o

E0P V&V in accordance with NRC and INPO guidance.

b. Responsibilities:

Assist V6V Coordinator in explanation and implementation of technical verification requirements and documentation of results.

8-9

2.5 Facilities / Materials Work room with table space to accommodate the participants o

+

and a place to store reference documents and other materials A copy of the generic and plant-specific technical guide-o lines for each participant A copy of each E0P to be evaluated o

A copy of the Guideline Conversion Documentation o

A copy of the Procedural Step Conversion Documentation o

o Access to technical source documents A copy of the Technical Verification Checklist for each E0P o

to be evaluated (see Section 2.6).

2.6 Specific Instructions for Performing Technical Verification 1.

Brief participants on the followings (V&V Coordinator)

a. Purpose and scope of overall EOP V&V Program

b. Participants and their roles

c. Steps of technical verification; use of the Technical Veri-fication Checklist.

2.

Conduct Technical Verification.

(Tech Evaluation Team)

a. For each E0P, perform a three-way comparison of the generic and plant-specific technical guidelines and the E0P, in accordance with the Technical Verification Checklist.

This will be done in group sessions, with one evaluator assigned to complete the Checklist, recording all partici-pants' comments about discrepancies and any unresolved ques-tions.

b. Verify the accuracy of each plant-specific value given in the PSTC/EOP by comparison to source data.

3.

Code checklist items for assessment and (V&V Coordinator resolution process.

or designee)

a. Review all checklist responses

b. Determine which responses describe acceptable differences between the PSTG, E0P, and source documentation and which responses identify discrepancies or questions that require assessment and resolution

c. Write a code by each response on the checklist that requires assessment and resolution.

Include the following in the code s Procedure number (e.g., OP-EO.ZZ-101 would be 101)

Response number (e.g., which comment? The first is 1, the second is 2, etc.).

For example:

101-1

--- 8-6

4.

Assemble Checklists and Results Forms for (V&V Coordinator) i documentation file and for assessment and resolution of V&V results.

2.7 Specific Instructions for Performing Partial Technical Verification A partial Technical Verification should be done when revisions are suggested for a limited portion of the procedures Setpoint change for instrumentation o

o Addition or removal of an alarm o Addition or removal of a control, controller, display o Changes in a table, graph or attachment.

1.

Brief evaluators on the followingt (V&V Coordinator)

a. Scope of the revision

b. Purpose and scopes of overall EOP V&V Program

c. Participants and their roles

d. Steps of technical verification, use of technical verification checklist.

2.

Conduct Technical Verification.

(Technical Evaluation

a. Identify'the portions of the Technical Verification Checklist to be used to evaluate scope of the revisions)

b. Identify the reason for the revision and (Technical Verification write this on the top of the first sheet Team) of the checklist. Verify the accuracy of the revision with respect to the applicable portions of the three-way comparison of the generic and plant-speelfic technical guidelines, and the E0P, using the Technical Verification Checklist.

c. Ensure that the applicable portions of (V&V Coordinator) the Technical Verification Checklist were completed by one team member. This team member should record all partici-pants' comments about discrepancies and unresolved questions.

i

d. Verify the accuracy of each plant (Technical Evalulation specific value that required change.

Team)

I l

-+n-

}

l 3.

Code checklist items for assessment and (V&V Coordinator resolution process.

or designee)

a. Review all checklist responses

b. Determine which responses describe acceptable differences between the PSTG, E0P, and source documentation and which responses identify discrepancies or questions that require assessment and resolution

c. Write a code by each response on the checklist that requires assessment and resolution.

Include the following in the coder Procedure number (e.g., OP-EO.ZZ-101 would be 101)

Response number (e.g., which comment? The first is 1, the second is 2, etc.).

For example:

101-1 4.

Assemble Checklists for documentation file (V&V Coordinator) and for assessment and resolution of V&V results.

2.8 Technical Verification Checklist The checklist that will be used in Technical Verification is presented on the following pages.

n I

r b

. MCO..

HOPE CREEK E0P V&V PROGRAM Pego 1 of 11 TECHNICAL VERIFICATION CHECKLIST Procedure & Rev No.

Date of Review:

Procedure

Title:

Applicable EPG:

Evaluator Names:

Licenses:

Job Titles:

RO SRO R0 SRO RO SRO 10 SRO R0 SRO INSTRUCTIONS Checklist items 1 through 5 are applicable to all EOPs except OP-EO.ZZ-099 and 100. Use checklist items 6 through 9 to verify those two procedures.

Each checklist item contains instructions for making comparisons and recording iindings. After completing the checklist you are asked to review i

the checklist findings and notes, and to summarise them on the Technical Verification Results Form.

S

HOPE CREEK EOP V&V PROGRAM Technical Verification Checklist (cont'd)

Page 2 of 11 l

1.

Compare each section of the EPG to the corresponding PSTG section.

Identify each substantive dif f erence f ound, other than insertion of a.

plant-specific information called for by the EPG, by completing columns 1 and 2 of Table la.

Then read the justification of the difference in the Guideline Conversion Documentation and complete column 3 of the table.

Table la: Verification of EPG-PSTG differences.

(Use next page for continuation if needed.)

1 2

3 EPG/PSTG

Section, Adequate Justification?

Step No.

Difference (summarize)

Yes No (explain)*

l

Also note any difference that does not appear to be justified adequately on a

(

copy of the PSTG.

i l

s

I BOPE CREEK E0? V&V PROGRAM Technical Verification Checklist (cont'd)

Page 3 of 11 Table la: Verification of EPG-PSTG differences (cont'd).

.,,. 1 2

3 EPG/PSTG

Section, Adequate Justification?

Step No.

Dif ference (summarize)

Yes No (explain)*

Also note any dif ference that does not appear to be justified adequately on a copy of the PSTG.

f HOPE CREEK E0P V&V PROGRAM I

Technical Verification Checklist (cont'd)

Page 4 of 11 l

l lb.

For each place where the EPG indicates that plant-specific I

information is needed, verify that the PSTG accurately specificies the plant-specific requirement. Refer to Appendix C calculation results and curves, to the Guideline Conversion Documentation, to the Setpoint Index, and to other sources as applicable.

Identify any omitted or questionable plant-specific data in Table Ib.

Table Ib: Verification of plant-specific information.

(Use next page for continuation if needed.)

1 2

3 EPG/PSTG Sten No.

Information Reauired Problem (describe)*

1 I

l

Also note any problem on a copy of the PSTG.

p-.

R0PE CREEK E0P V&V PROGRAM Technical Verification Checklist (cont'd)

Page 5 of 11 Table Ib: Verification of plant-specific information (cont'd).

1 2

3 EPC/PSTG Sten No.

Information Recuired Problem (describe)*

Also note any problem on a copy of the PSTG.

r HOPE CREEK E0P V&V PROGRAM Technical Verification Checklist (cont'd)

Page 6 of 11 Note 2.3.4.5 The accuracy of the PSTG with reference to the EPG and other source documents was verified in checklist item 1.

The f ollowing items will compare the E0P to the PSTG.

Use the findings from item 1 to make sure that you take into account any discrepancies between the PSTG and the EPG.

2.

Compare the purpose stated in Section 1.0 of the E0P text to the purpose stated in the PSTG. Does the E0P purpose statement clearly cover the intended scope as defined in the PSTG7 Yes No If No, explain:

3.

Review the E0P flowchart.

Are the steps and the final plant status it defines consistent with the purpose stated in both the PSTG and the E0P text?

Yes No If No, explain:

4.

Compare the entry conditions stated in the PSTG to those indicated on the E0P flowchart.

Are the entry conditions shown on the flowchart complete and consistent with the PSTG7 Yes No If No, explain:

l l

l

R0PE CREEK E0P V&V PROGRAM Technical Verification Checklist (cont'd)

Page 7 of 11 5.

Compare each numbered block (step) of the E0P flowchart to the corresponding step in the PSTG. Ensure consistency of the following:

o Intent of step.

o Place of step in the total sequence of steps, o Conditions for starting and stopping actions.

Any time period or time limits for completing actions.

o o Plant systems and components identified.

o Parameters to be monitored, and paraneter units,

[arameter ranges, values, or trend directions given as criteria o

or cues for decisions or actions.

o Point of entry from another procedure.

Review the other procedure to make sure that the interf ace between the two is correct.

o Instructions to go to other steps within the procedure or to other procedures.

Check the referenced step or the point of entry into the referenced procedure to make sure the interf ace is correct.

i o Referrals to curves or other operator aids.

Check the aid to make sure it is appropriate in light of step content.

o Use of cautions and Notes. Where a Caution is referenced by number, review its content to verify that it is applicable to the steps indicated.

In reviewing the E0P, also evaluate the completeness and clarity of steps, notes, and cautions.

If you find places that seem to need clarification, or where operators may need additional information, sidentify and explain the need in Table 5 (next pa ge ).

1 When a technical difference between the E0P flowchart and the PSTG is found, review the Procedural Step Conversion Documentation and source documentation to determine whether there is a basis for the difference.

Record your findings in Table 5 (next page).

O I

I L

50PE CREEK E0P V&V PROGRAM Technical Verification Checklist (cont'd)

Page 8 of 11 Table 5: Verification of E0P flowchart accuracy and consistency with PSTC.

EOF Sten No.

Descrintion of Difference. Recommended Action O

ROPE CRELK E0P V&V PROGRAM Technicai Verification Checklist (cont'd)

Page 9 of 11 Note 6.7.8.9 These remaining checklist items apply only to OP-EO.ZZ-099 (Post-Scram Restoration) and OP-EO.ZZ-100 (Reactor Scram).

l 6.

Review the source documentation that defines the bases for the procedure.

Then review the Purpose stated in Section 1.0 of the E0P text.

l Is the E0P Purpose consistent with the scope of the action requirements identified in the source documentation?

Yes No If No, explain:

7.

Does the Purpose stated in the E0P text clearly and adequately summarize i

response defined in che 10P flowchart and the final plant status to be l

achieved as indicated by the flowchart?

Yes No i

l If No, explain:

l l

8.

Compare the entry conditions shown on the 10P flowchart to those indicated in the source documentation.

Are they consistent?

Yes No l

If No, explain:

l

HOPE CREEK E0P V&V PROGRAM Technical Verification Checklist (cont'd)

Page 10 of 11 9.

Review each numbered block (step) of the E0P flowchart and verify the following by reference to source documentation:

o Intent of step.

o Place of step in the total sequence of steps, o Conditions for starting and stopping actions.

o Any time period or time limits for completing actions, o Plant systems and components identified.

o Parameters to be monitored, and parameter units.

o Parameter ranges, values, or trend directions given as criteria or cues for decisions or actions.

o Point of entry from another procedure. Review the other procedure to make sure that the interface between the two is correct.

o Instructions to go to other steps within the procedure or to other procedares.

Check the referenced step or the point of entry into the referenced procedure to make sure the interf ace is correct.

o Referrals to curves or other operator aids.

Check the aid to make sure it is appropriate in light of step content.

o Use of Cautions and Notes.

Where a Caution is referenced by number, review its content to verify that it is applicable to the steps indicated.

In reviewing the E0P, also evaluate the completeness and clarity of steps, notes, and cautions.

If you find places that seem to need clarification, or where operators may need additional information, identify and explain the need in Table 9 (next page).

When a technical dif ference between the IOP flowchart and source documentation is found, or where no source can be identified, complete Table 9 (next page).

ROPE CREEK E0P V67 PROGRAM Technical Verification Checklist (cont'd)

Page 11 of 11 Table 9:

Verification of E0P flowchart accuracy and consistency with source documentation.

1 2

3 E0P Sten No.

Source Identification Difference. Recommended Action 4

u

1 3.0 EDITORAL VERIFICATION 3.1 Objective The objective of editoral verification is to ensure that Hope Creek E0Ps are written in accordance with the Hope Creek Procedure Writer's Guide.

This activity will ensure that procedures are written consistently, clearly and succinctly.

Content, style and format specifications will be reviewed.

Editorial verification will also check that EOPs are written in vocabulary familiar to the operators.

3.2 Appilcability The editorial verification process will be performed on all procedures

]

before their approval for use.

In addition, should an approved procedure be completely rewritten, the complete verification process will be performed on the rewrite.

When a step, subsection or attachment to an approved procedure is i

changed, editorial verification steps will be performed as necessary to ensure all procedure changes are written in accordance with the Writer's Guide and are typographically correct.

When a technical verification is completed on only specific parts of a procedure, editorial verification of only those sections will be required.

The instructions given in Sections 3.6 and 3.7 cover editorial verifica-tion of an entire procedure and verification of partial revisions separately.

i 3.3 Susinery of Nethod Editorial verification is also a " tabletop" activity. Procedure text and flowcharts are reviewed to determine if they comply with the guidance in the

'Jritar's ruide. Persons participating in the editorial verification exercises will use a check 11st to review each ites and document problems. Where the checklist 'and the procedure disagree, notations will be made on the checklist itself.

Later, these notations will be reviewed, assessed and resolved fol-lowing the method outlined in Section 5.0.

i I

i

f p

3.4 Personnel i

The qualifications and responsibilities of the personnel required to con-duct the editorial verification are listed below:

1.

V&V Coordinator

a. Qualifications:

Experience as a Senior Reactor Operator and/or currently in SRO license training program at Hope Creek Generating Station Thorough knowledge of Hope Creek EOPs, Writer's Guide, and procedures Authority to schedule editorial verification activities and assign duties to personnel,

b. Responsibilities Schedule activities, facilities, and personnel Ensure that copies of the EOPs, reference documents and materials, Writer's Guide and checklists are available Conduct preverification briefings to explain the overall purpose of the EOP V&V program and the specific process of editorial verification Coordinate and supervise editorial verification activi-ties Ensure that all documentation of activities is properly completed, filed and distributed.

2.

Editorial Evaluators (minimum of 1 for each procedurel will be a person who did not participate in writing the procedures)

a. Qualifications Expertise as an editor, and/or o Is a Shif t Technical Advisor o Is a PSE&G employee whose normal job duties require preparation, review and revision of written materials o Is a human factors specialist M.A./MS in a human factors discipline Two years experience in application of human factors in nuclear power industry Experience in procedures development and/or conduct of E0P V&V in accordance with NRC and INPO guide-lines.

b. Responsibilities Perform the verification of written correctness, complet-ing the appilcable checklist

- Prepare written comments to identify and explain any deviations from the Writer's Guide or other information presentation problems areas found in the procedures

- Through the V&V Coordinator, resolve any questions about written correctness that may require input from opera-tions personnel.

3.5 Facilities / Materials o Work room with table space to accommodate the participants and a place to store reference documents and materials o A copy of the Hope Creek Procedures Generation Package including the Writer's Guide Copies of the Editorial Verification Checklist for each o

participant for each E0P to be evaluated.

3.6 Specific Instructions for Performing Editorial Verification 1.

For each E0P, complete an Editorial Verification Checklist.

Identify any section or step that does not conform to criteria, as instructed in the Checklist.

2.

Review completed Checklist to ensure all items were reviewed and that locations of discrepancies in the E0P are identified explicitly.

3.

Assemble all Checklists for documentation files and later assessment and resolution of comments.

3.7 Specific Instructions for Partial Editorial Verification of a Procedure Partial editorial verification will only be performed in conjunction with partial technical verification.

1.

Review the procedure revisions and the Editorial Verification Checklist to decide which checklist parts and items will be applicable.

Complete these and' identify any section or step that does not conform to criteria, as instructed in the check-list.

'~

i i

2.

Review completed checklist items to ensure the locations of discrepancies in the EGP-are identified explicitly.

3.

Assemble the checklist for documentation files and later assessment and resolution of comments.

r.

j

3.8 Editorial Verification Checklist The checklist that wil be used in Editorial Verification is presented on the following pages, t

HOPE CREEK E0P V6V PROGRAM Page 1 of 7 EDITORIAL VERIFICATION CHECKLIST Procedure & Rev No.:

Procedure

Title:

Evaluator Name:

Job

Title:

Evaluator License: R0 SRO N/A INSTRUCTIONS The checklist is designed to address major parts of the procedure in turn:

title page, table of contents, major sections, attachments / tables and flowchart.

All checklist items call for a "yes" or "no" answer.

"No" indicates a discrepancy from the Writer's Guide.

In such cases, use the " Comments" column to identify the problem (e.g., record the step number) and describe the deviation in detail.

If an item is not applicable to a particular procedure, please note in the comments column Upon completion of the checklist, read the statement below and sign.

SIGN-OFF All Checklist items have been reviewed and all comments were written in the space provided.

Evaluator Signature Date

HOPE CREEK E0P V&V PROGRAM Page 2 of 7 EDITORIAL VERIFICATION CHECKLIST Identification YES NO COMMENTS 1.

Does the E0P have a unique identification number?

2.

Is the title of the E0P descriptive and in accordance with information contained in the purpose?

3.

Is the E0P number in accordance with the guidance provided in the Writer's Guide, page 37 4.

Following the "REV" abbreviation, is a two digit number defining the revision number present?

5.

Are changes incorporated to the current revision of the E0P defined on the E0P title page in the " Remarks" section?

6.

Is the E0P number provided on each page (including table of contents) in upper right and lower left corners?

7.

Is a page number provided on each page?

8.

Is the revision number written on each page in the bottom right corner?

9.

Are pages numbered sequentially?

10.

Does title page contain:

o E0P number o E0P title o Revision number

11. Do the words "LAST PAGE" appear to the right of the page number on the final procedure page (i.e., last page of Section 4.0, Responsibilities)?

i i

HOPE CREEK E0P V6V PROGRAM Page 3 of 7 EDITORIAL VERIFICATION CHECKLIST (cont.)

YES NO COMNENTS Format 12.

Is there suf ficient contrast provided (black print with white paper) for all E0P pages, attachments and flowcharts?

13. Does the title page conform to the format shown in the Writer's Guide, Attachment 17 14.

Is the Table of Contents numbered page 17 15.

Does the table of contents conform to the format shown in Attachment 2 of the Writer's Guide?

16. Do all the section and major division titles listed in the E0P appear in the Table of Contents?

17. Are each of the following sections contained within the E0P:

o Section 1.0, Purpose o Section 2.0, References o Section 3.0, Definitions o Section 4.0, Responsibilities o Section 5.0, Procedure 18.

If this procedure is in the 100 or 200 series, the steps are presented as a flowchart?

19.

If this procedure is in the 300 series, the steps are presented as written text?

20.

Are the parts of the procedure, prior to the flowchart, on 8 1/ 2 x 11 inch paper ?

21.

On the 81/2 x 11 inch paper, is the lef t margin approximately 3/4 inch to allow hole punching without document oblitera-tion?

HOPE CREEK E0P V&V PROGRAM Page 4 of 7

)

l EDITORIAL VERIFICATION CHECKLIST (cont.)

l Attachments and Tables YES NO COMMENTS 22.

Is this attachment, form, diagram, special instruction or checklist providing supple-mental information to the E0P?

23.

Are all attachments / tables or graphs identified as attachments?

24.

Do tables include lists or tabular infor-nation?

25.

Are forms labeled as attachments?

26.

Does this form have a unique identifier which links it to the procedure (e.g.,

Form OP-EO.ZZ 101 (Q) -1)?

27.

Are attachments and tables placed at the end of the procedure (following the flow-chart or text)?

28.

Is each attachment / table or graph numbered independently?

29.

Are all attachments / tables:

o Descriptively titled?

o Clearly labeled?

o Readable?

30.

For each attachment / table containing multiple pages, is the page number and total number of pages (page x of y) on each page?

31.

Do attachment / table numbers appear on all applicable pages?

32.

Are attachments or tables in the correct relative order to other attachments (i.e.,

they should be numbered and appear in the order in which they are cited within the E0P)?

33.

Are the attachment pages on 8 1/2 x 11 inch paper in size?

34.

Is the lef t margin approximately 3/4 inch to allow hole punching without document obliteration?

HOPE CREEK E0P V&V PROGRAM Page 5 of 7 EDITORIAL VERIFICATION CHECKLIST Flowchart Steo Format YES NO COMMENTS

35. Are steps written in a simple, concise manner?

36. Overall, is the step vritten in proper English?

37.

Are the steps written to avoid combina-tions of "and/or" terms?

38.

Are logic terms in conditional statements emphasized by using underscoring (If, Then, And, Or. When)?

39.

Are conditional steps expressed such that the condition is stated before the action which is to be perf ormed?

40.

Do commands appear in bold print?

41. Are flowpath actions written in short, concise, identifiable steps as opposed to paragraphs?

42.

Are steps with more than one action minimized?

43.

Are numerous objects or actions listed and bulleted?

44.

Are items listed when there are five or h

more?

g 9

i 45.

Do acronyms and abbreviations conform to the abbreviation list provided in the Writer's Guide (Attachment 4)?

46.

Is the panel number provided for steps to be perf ormed at a local panel?

47.

When a deviation from a setpoint is allowed, is it given as a range or ILaiting value rather than as a percen-tage?

J

HOPE CREEK E0P V&V PROGRAM Page 6 of 7 EDITORIAL VERIFICATION CHECKLIST (cont.)

Flowchart Step Format (cont.)

YES NO COMNENTS

48. Are all referenced documents clearly identified by procedure number?

49. Are citations for referenced procedures accurately stated?

50.

If calculations are required, is space provided to perf orm them?

51. Are formulas for calculation provided when needed?

52. Are Caution indicators (i.e.,

circles) placed immediately adjacent the step (s) to which they apply?

53. Do caution statements avoid the use of action statements ?

l Flowchart Style and Format "ES NO COMMENTS 54.

Do flowchart symbols, conform to those provided in the Writer's Guide, Attachment 37

55. Are major symbol blocks (action, decision or retainment steps) easy to detect and discriminate ?

56. Are symbols for entries and exits (including procedure to procedure) coded?

57.

Do all decision steps require a choice of i

one of two opposite possibilities (i.e.,

YES / NO, HIGH/ LOW, etc. ) ?

58.

In decision steps, is the direction of YES/NO, HIGH/ LOW, etc., paths consistent?

59. Does the spacing of paths allow operator easy and accurate movement through the different flowchart branches?

t

HOPE CREEK EOP V6V PROGRAM Page 7 of 7 EDITORIAL VERIFICATION CHECKLIST (cont.)

Flowebart Style and Format (cont.)

YES NO COMMENTS 60.

Is the direction of flowchart paths indicated by arrows?

61. Are path and loop logic complete so there is no ambiguity about how to proceed?

62.

Are entries to flowpaths indicated as illustrated in the Writer's Guide, ?

63. Are entrances to the lef t of the EOP steps?

64.

De entry arrows contain the E0P number and step that directed the operator to this E0P?

65. Are exits from flowpaths indicated as illustrated in the Writer's Guide, 7

66. Are all exit arrows directed toward the right side of the procedure?

67. Do exit arrows contain the procedure number and step to be entered?

68.

If a graph or table is cited in the flow-chart, does it provide:

o Readable information o Information that can be extracted to the necessary level of detail o Values that correspcod to plant instrumentation?

69.

Are margins sufficient, so that all infor-nation is clear and readable?

70.

Is the quality of the copy so that the flowchart is readable?

4.0 VALIDATION 4.1 Objective The objective of validation is to ensure that the actions specified in the EOPs can be followed by trained operators to manage emergency conditions in the plant. Validation addresses the operational usability and effective-ness of the procedures, and their compatibility with plant responses, hard-ware, and shift staffing.

4.2 Applicability The validation process will be performed on all new procedures prior to their approval for operational use.

In addition, validation will be performed when existing, approved procedures are revised, depending on the nature of the revision. A revised procedure must be validated when:

The revision arises fr9m a plant equipment change (hardware o

or software) that alters the functions or response character-istics of a system or subsystem, or alters interrelationships between systems or subsystems.

o The revision arises from a change in equipment characteristics that alters the functions or response characteristics of a system or subsystem, or alters interrelationships between systems or subsystems.

o The revision arises from a change in plant equipment that could affect radioactive release control or that raises an environmental question not previously addressed.

o The revision changes cues for operator actions or the expected results of operator actions.

The revision changes the sequence of operator actions on one o

or more branches of the procedure, i

Validation should in all cases be preceded by verification.

4.3 Summary of Methods Two methods of validation will be used:

1.

Simulation -- Control room personnel perform the procedure on the plant simulator for an observer team.

This will be done for each E0P insofar as the emergency corditions addressed by the EOP can be simulated.

2.

Walk-Through -- Control room personnel perform a step-by-step enactment of the procedure for an observer team, without 4-1

4 actually executing control actions. This will be done for E0Ps that cannot be simulated adequately.

In addition, a nonperformance walk-through will be done during the DCRDR to check consistency of terminology between each E0P and the displays and controls provided in the control room.

Scenarios will be prepared for use in simulator exercises and control room walk-throughs. A scenario is a structural plan of parameter and plant-symptom changes.

Its purpose is to provide the cues needed to guide the path of performance. This is necessary since there are decision points in the pro-cedures where the appropriate course of action depends on plant conditions which may be variable.

4.4 Selection of Validation Method Either simulator or walk-through exercises can be used to validate an E0P.

When possible, simulator validation is the preferred method.

Simulator validation allows the operators to perform actions in real time with plant responses similiar to those of the actual unit. When the computer models on the simulator do not allow certain scenarios to be performed, or when most actions in the procedure are performed outside the control room, walk-through validation exercises will be performed.

Some additional guidelines for the selection of E0Ps for simulator validation are given below:

o If several E0Ps are to be validated, the selection should be made to represent the array of symptoms which the procedures involve (e.g.. Drywell pressure above 1.68 psig, Reactor pressure above 1037 psig, Scram conditions, Drywell tempera-ture above 1350F). Parts of the E0Ps may be selected for simulation to avoid repetition of comparable steps in dif-ferent procedures.

o Simulator validation is desirable where branching occurs (within a single procedure or from one procedure to another).

Enough of each procedure should be performed to ensure that transitions are possible and operationally correct.

o If an E0P directs operators to go to another procedure and perform it concurrently, the feasibility of this should be examined using the simulator, Where response times could af fect plant conditions, simu-o lator validation is recommended.

4-2

An E0P or part of an E0P should be validated using a simula-o tor if it requires close coordination of actions by differ-ent operators.

Where multiple problems or failures exist, simulator valida-o tion is recommended.

4.5 Specification of Scenarios A brief narrative statement should be written to specify the conditions under which the procedure is assumed to be performed and the path to be followed through the procedure.

Several kinds of scenarios may be used:

(1) A scenario may be limited to one flowpath of a single procedure; (2) a scenario may require that more than one flowpath of a single crocedure be executed; or (3) a scenario may require concurrent execution of two or more procedures. At a mimimum, at least one of each of the following cases should be simulated:

o A scenario in which execution of the Reactor Scram pro-cedure, OP-EO.ZZ-100, is followed by the Post-Scram Recovery procedure, OP-EO.ZZ-099.

A scenario in which multiple flowpaths within one procedure o

are executed (e.g., OP-EO.ZZ-101).

o A scenario in which concurrent performance of two or more procedures occurs (OP-EO.ZZ-102 and 202, OP-EO.ZZ-103, 100, and 202, OP-EO.ZZ-201 and 203).

A scenario in which Reactor Flooding, OP-EO.ZZ-206, is o

entered via Emergency Depressurization, OP-EO.ZZ-202.

o A scenario in which Alternate Shutdown Cooling, OP-E0.ZZ-205, is executed.

The scenario descriptions should include the following:

Conditions prior to procedure initiation - Include plant o

mode, power level (e.g., full power) and the status of system and major components that will affect or be affected by events.

Unless otherwise stated, systems will be assumed to be in normal lineup and operating status, o Initiating event - This is a statement of what causes the operators to enter the E0P.

Include the underlying cause and the major symptoms observable in the control room (e.g.,

unisolable small break inside the RPV, high drywell pres-sure, decrease in suppression pool level, initiating alarms, etc.).

4-3

i I

I l

Subsequent events - Identify the major operator actions and l

o plant changes (plant factors requiring operator action and plant response to operator action).

When different flowpaths may be chosen in executing the pro-cedure, specify the flowpath to be followed in the valida-tion exercise.

State any assumptions about plant variables l

that underlie the flowpath chosen.

l-When branching to or. concurrent execution of another pro-cedure is a part of the scenario, specify the procedure and the point of entry in the " subsequent events." Also, if applicable, specify when a return to the original procedure occurs and where it is reentered.

i Final conditions - Specify the plant status at the end of o

the scenario. Also specify the status of systems and major components af fected by the ever.ts of the scenario (e.g.,

Scres, all control rods inserted. cooldown in progress, etc.).

If the procedure will be validated on the simulator, the scenario should be reviewed.by the simulator operator to ensure that it is feasible as written. Also, there may be plant response delays, or long periods required to bring plant conditions to a desired state, during which operator actions would be essentially repetitive. Such delays may be eliminated. The stop and restart points should be identified so that they may be programmed in advance.

The scenario description should be annotated to show when time-slicing is to be used and to identify the stop and restart cues.

4.6 Persommel The following types of personnel will participate in the validation exer-eises. Minimum qualifications and responsibilities are listed for each per-sonnel catagory identified:

1.

V&V Coordinator

a. Qualifications j

Experience as a Senior Reactor Operator and/or currently l

in the SRO license training program at Hope Creek Generating Station Thorough knowledge of the EOPs and associated documen-i l

tation 4-4 l

- Thorough knowledge of plant systems Authority to schedule simulator sessions and control room activities

- Authority to schedule and assign duties to personnel.

a. Responsibilities

- Schedule activities, facilities and personnel Ensure that copies of EOPs, reference documents and materials are available Conduct prevalidation briefings to explain the overall purpose of the EOP V&V Program and the specific process of validation exercises Coordinate and supervise validation activities; partici-pate as required

- Ensure that all documentation of activities is properly completed, filed and distributed.

2.

Validation Exercise Participants

a. Qualifications

- Shif t Supervisor - experience as a Senior Reactor Operator and/or currently in the SRO license training program at Hope Creek Generating Station Nuclear Control Operators - experience as Reactor Operators and/or currently in the RO license training program at Hope Creek Generating Station.

b. Responsibilities Fulfill the roles assigned by the V&V Coordinator Participate in implementation of the EOPs either in simu-lator or control room walk-through exercises Complete Review Checklists with Comment Sheets following exercises.

3.

Observers (minimum of 2 for each procedure; they will be per-sonnel who did not participate in writing the procedures)

a. Qualifications One observer may be an Operations Specialist with the fol-lowing minimum qualifications:

Operations experience in a commercial nuclear station One year of experience in the application of human factors in the nuclear power industry Experience in procedures development.

1 i

4-5

~

i One observer may be a Human Factors Specialist with the following minimum qualifications:

M. A./M.S. in a human factors discipline Two years experience in the application of human factors in the nuclear power industry Experience in procedures development and/or conduct of E0P V&V in accordance with NRC and INPO guidance.

Observers may be personnel from the PSE&G Hope Creek Generating Station training department with the following minimum qualifications:

Knowledge of the EOPs and related documentation Thorough knowledge of the plant systems Familiarity with the Procedures Generation Package and EOP V&V objectives and requirements,

b. Responsibilities Observe assigned operators performing the procedures Prepare comments on the procedures Assist the V&V Coordinator in explaining and implementing EOP validation requirements and documenting results.

4.

Simulator Instructor (necessary for simulation exercises only)

a. Responsibilities Initialize the simulator as required by the scenario to be run Operate the simulator Play the roles of all personnel outside the control room Support the simulator validation effort as assigned by the V&V Coordinator.

4.7 Facilities / Materials Designated time periods on the simulator or in the control o

room, as appropriate o Copies of the EOPs to be evaluated Copy of " Guidelines for E0P Validation Observations" for o

each observer Copies of the Comment Form for validation exercise partici-o pants and observers 4-6

o Copies of Validation Comment Form Cover Sheet o Copies of the EOP Performance Review Checklist for each validation exercise participant.

4.8 Specific Instructions for Performing Simulator Validation 1.

Brief participants on the following:

(V&V Coordinator)

a. Purpose and scope of validation process

b. Steps of simulator validation

c. Responsibilities / assignments of each participant

d. Procedure to be performed, 2.

Prepare the simulator.

(Simulator Instructor) i

a. Establish initial conditions according to the scenario

b. Plan / program stop points and restart points if applicable to the scenario

c. Initialize the simulator.

3.

Perform a practice run of scenario to (All participants) ensure there is no confusion about roles and no simulation problems.

4.

Reinitialize simulator.

(Simulator Instructor) 5.

Perform validation exercise.

(All participants)

a. Control room personnel execute procedural steps according to scenario, as they would be done in actual performance

b. Simulator instructor monitors and controls simulator and acts as "other personnel" when required

c. Observers watch performance and record comments.

6.

Conduct review session after performance of (All participants) each scenario,

a. Discuss any questions that arose during observation

b. Discuss the use of the Review Checklist and Comment forms

c. Have each participant independently complete a Review Check-list and Comment Form

d. Collect all checklists and forms to include in documentation package.

7.

Code comments for assessment (V&V Coordinator and resolution process, or designee)

a. Review all comments written by observers and participants 4-7

b. Determine which are general comments or opinions and which comments require investigation and formal resolution

c. Assign a code to all comments requiring assessment and resolution.

Include the following in code:

Activity identifier (SIM for simulator validation)

Participant (SS, R01, R02, OB1, HF)

Comment sequence number.

For example:

SIM-R01-1.

d. Write code on Comment Forms adjacent to comment.

4.9 Specific Instructions for Performing Walk-through Validation 1.

Brief participants on the following:

(V6V Coordinator)

a. Purpose and scope of validation process

b. Steps of walk-through validation

c. Responsibilities / assignments of each participant

d. Scenarios to be performed -- review each in relation to pro-cedure just before it is to be performed. Discuss action cues and assumptions about parameter changes that will guide the course of action.

2.

Perform a practice walk-through approxi-(All participants) t, mating real performance, to ensure there is no confusion about cues and to establish how activity is divided and phased among the personnnel,

a. Shif t Supervisor verbalizes cues

b. Control room personnel enact procedural steps, according to scenario, representing actual performance as much as possible

c. Personnel point to controls and displays they would use

d. Observers watch the action to identify where cues and feed-back are needed and to determine how activity may be phased in final walk-through.

3.

Discuss practice walk-through.

(All participants)

a. Resolve any problems about cues and feedback, or other matters

b. Establish phasing of activity for final walk-through.

4.

Perform walk-through exercise.

(All participants)

a. V&V Coordinator reviews scenario with participants

b. Shift Supervisor verbalizes cues 4-8

c. V&V Coordinator directs phasing of activity

d. Control room personnel enact procedure according to scenario, pointing out controls and displays used.

5.

Conduct review session after performance of (All participants) each scenarie.

a. Discuss any questions that arose during observation

b. Discuss the use of the Review Checklist and Comment Forms

c. Have each participant independently complete a Review Check-list and Comment Form

d. Collect all completed Review Checklists and Comment Forms to include in documentation package.

6.

Code comments for assessment and resolution (V&V coordinator

process, or designee)

a. Review all comments written by observers and participants

b. Determine which are general comments or opinions and which comments require assessment and formal resolution

c. Assign a code to all comments requiring assessment and resolution.

Include the following in the code:

- Activity identifier (CR for control room walk-through)

- Participant (SS, R01, R02, OB1, HF)

- Comment sequence number.

For example:

CR-SS-3.

d. Write code on comment forms adjacent to comment.

4.10 Validation Forms The forms that will be used in validation are presented on the following pages.

4-9 1

HOPE CREEK EOP V&V PROGRAM Page 1 of 2 E0P PERFORMANCE REVIEW CHECKLIST Each participant in the validation performance exercise should complete a Performance Review Checklist.

If a problem or question related to any item is identified, the reviewer should explain it on a Comment Form.

The Checklists and Comment Forms completed by all reviewers should be assembled in one package and given to the V&V Coordinator.

Procedure No. & Rev:

Title:

Validation Method (check one)

Simulator Walk-Through Reviewer Name:

Job

Title:

License :

R0 SRO Role in validation performance exercise:

1.

Is sufficient information provided in the E0P for qualified operators to perform each required action?

2.

Is sufficient information available for the operator to make a correct choice at each decision point?

3.

Does the E0P adequately handle needs for recurrent verifications or actions?

4.

Did personnel use system responses or other information that is not indicated in the EOP? If so, should this information be in the E0P?

5.

Did personnel perform any action that were not specified in the EOP? If so, should the action be specified in the E0P?

6.

Was an alternate path used, not in the procedure, that should be identified?

i 7.

Is any terminology, nomenclature, abbreviation, acronym, or symbol used in the E0P that is not familiar to operators?

i f

l

HOPE CREEK E0P V&V PROGRAM E0P Perf ormance Review Checklist (cont'd)

Page 2 of 2 8.

Are locations of equipment, controls, or displays that are infrequently used, are in out-of-the-way places, or are at local panels adequately described?

9.

Did equipment respanses correspond to what is in the procedure?

10.

Did the procedure accurately predict what actually happened?

11. Did the procedure achieve the expected objective?

12.

Is the procedure consistent with the manning philosophy?

13.

When the procedure was perf ormed by more than one person, did the Shif t Supervisor define their individual responsibilities clearly?

14.

Did the operators have enough time to accomplish what was required?

15.

Where setpoints or other limiting values apply, was enough guidance presented to ensure timely operator action?

16. Was sufficient information given to allow the operators to find

~

the appropriate controls and displays?

17.

Were prerequisites for starting equipment clearly identified?

18.

Did the procedure instruct the operators to start equipment at the appropriate time?

19. Did communications occur at the appropriate points?

20.

Was any interference in communications observed?

21.

Is the information provided in the procedure in a form that is easily used?

)

22.

Was the coordination of multiple flow paths or multiple procedures handled in a manner that resulted in each operator being aware of his responsibilities and of current plant conditions ?

23.

Were instructions concerning actions to be taken presented clearly?

Reviewer Signature:

Date:

4 4

_.,._m.

,, - -, ~., _. __-

HOPE CREEK EOP V&V PROGRAM VALIDATION COMMENT PORM COVER SEEET The Comment Form should be used to record any problems or questions identified during each validation activity. Make sure this cover sheet is completed and attached to the set of Comment Forms prepared for each procedure during each a ctivity.

Procedure No.& Rev:

Procedure

Title:

Validation Method (check one)

Simulator Walk-Through Participants (please record name, job title, license if applicable, and role in the validation activity, for each participant):

\\

(

FO N

O ITU E

L G

O A

S P

ER DE TSE G

GUS M

R EF TN E

MO C

TN EM M

OC

R EB MU i

M E

E R

R U5 U

D D

E P E

E C

C T

O OS R

R P

l P

4 5.0 ASSESSMEIrr AND RESOLUTI0le t

i An assessment will be performed to determine the disposition of the find-f ings from technical verification, editorial verification, and validation for

-each E0P. Changes to be made in the E0P and associated documentation will be specified as part of the assessment and resolution activity, taking into 1,

account any recommendations made during the preceding review activitics.

i 5.1 Objectives The objectives of assessment and resolution are:

i To ensure that all questions that arise during review o

activities are resolved.

To ensure that any changes to correct or enhance an EOP will o

be consistent with the applicable source documents and with i

the guidance provided in the Procedures Generation Package.

o To ensure that the PSTG and conversion documentation will be l

updated as necessary to maintain them as accurate documen-tation of the EOP bases.

To ensure that a change made in one E0P is reflected as F

o necessary in the other E0Ps.

To provide documentation of the disposition of E0P V&V find-o ings.

i I

5.2 Persoamel i

The V&V Coordinator will direct and participate in all assessment and resolution activities. The V&V Coordinator will be responsible for ensuring cicar documentation of the disposition of all findings.

I The assessment and resolution team will include a minimum of one addi-y tional person with the following qualifications Knowledge of the E0Ps and associated documentation o

l o Thorough knowledge of plant systems Familiarity with the Procedures Generation Package and EOP

+

o V&V objectives and requirements.

5.3 phterials A complete documentation package from technical verifi-o cation, editorial verification, and validation of each E0P J

i 5-1

A copy of each E0P and its source documentation (EPG, PSTG.

o the EPG-to-PSTG Conversion Documentation, the PSTG-to-EOP Step Conversion Documentation, Appendix C calculation results)

Access to other technical source documents (e.g., Technical o

Specifications, Setpoint Index, etc.)

Copies of the EOP V&V. Resolution Form (see Section 5.5) o

_ Copies of the E0P V&V Acceptance Form (see Section 5.5).

o 5.4 Method For each EOP, the assessment team will review all discrepancies and all comments and questions requiring resolution that were identified during tech-nical verification, editorial verification, and validation. The disposition of each item will be recorded on the Resolution Form (see Section 5.5) with an item identification code.

Technical Verification findings that require attention during assessment and resolution will be flagged by an item identification code on the Technical Verification Checklist.

Similarly, comments from the validation exercises will be coded on the validation Comment Forms. These item codes may simply be transferred to the Resolution Form as each item is considered by the assess-ment team.

Findings and questions from editorial verification are noted in the com-ments column of the Editorial Verification Checklist. For each of these comments, it should be determined if changes to the text or flow chart are required. Actual changes should be marked on copies of the procedure.

For each coded cosusent from the Technical Verification or Validation exercises, a disposition should be made and recorded on Resolution Forms. The code number of each disposition should appear adjacent to the appropriate disposition, j-If it is determined that no change should be made in response to an ites, I

the reason should be noted in the disposition column of the Resolution Form.

All changes to be made should be described in the disposition column.

If a particular disposition cannot be specified, the item and the follow-up action i

needed should be described. The Resolution Form will then provide a single, complete record of all items and decisions pertaining to each procedure.

5-2

In addition, all changes to be made will be marked on a copy of the procedure. This ensures that changes will be made in an integrated way, so that their possible ef fects on each other, and on other parts and steps of the i

procedure, will be taken into account.

Other EOPs referenced in the E0P under consideration should also be checked to determine whether the proposed change requires that a change also be made in a referenced E0P.

Any such changes needed in associated documentation or in a referenced E0P should be noted in the item disposition.

When all dispositions have been completed, an EOP V&V Acceptance Form will be prepared (see Section 5.5).

The Acceptance Form will be attached to the V&V documentation package and submitted for final review and approval by the Operations Manager.

5.5 Assessment and Resolution Forms The forms that will be used to document the assessment and resolution of EOP V&V findings are presented on the following pages.

1 1

1 5-3

c HOPE CREEK E0P V&V PROGRAM Page 1 of RESOLUTION OF P.0P V6V PINDINGS Procedure & Rev No.:

Date:

Procedure

Title:

Participants in Assessment and Resolution (name, job title, license):

Item Code Disposition

..-..s

B0FE CREEK EOF V6V PROGRAM Resolution of Findings (contd)

.? age of i

Procedure & Rev No.:

Item Code Disnosition 9

HOPE CREEK EOP V&V PROGRAM E0P VERIFICATION & VALIDATION ACCEPTANCE FORM Procedure & Rev No. :

Procedure

Title:

1.

This procedure has been evaluated using the steps for technical verification, editoral verification and validation, as defined in the Work Plan for the Hope Creek Verification and Validation Program.

2.

An assessment of the findings from those Verification and Validation activities has been performed and changes in the E0P have been specified, as necessary, to correct any problems identified.

3.

Any open items that remain to be resolved concerning this procedure are described on the Resolution Form.

4.

The steps performed were adequate to ensure that the objectives of the Hope Creek EOP Verification and Validation Program have been met with respect to this procedure.

Signa ture :

Date:

The verification and validation of this procedure is accepted as complete:

Signature:

Date:

l

.i

.s-(7 a

't g

1 I

w

\\

N 4

)

I E

- i t

4 ENCLOSURE 2

+

1 b

4 i

i 4

8wm S

e

\\;

s

l APPENDIX C CALCIEATIONAL PROCEDURE 9.0 DRYWELL SPRAY INITIATION PRESSURE LIMIT 9.1 APPLICABLE CUIDELINE STEPS setore drywell comperature reaches (340*r (maximum temperature DV/T-3 at unica ADS qualified or drywell design temperature, whichever is lower)] but only if (suppression chancer temperacute and drywell pressure are below the Drywell Spray Iniciacion Pressure Limic], (snuc down recirculacion pumps and drywell cooling fans and] iniciate drywell sprays (rescricting flow race co less cnan 720 gpm (Maximum Drywell Spray Flow Race Limic)].

eso

\\\\

E I

L w

I hm l

3 II.

1

\\\\

OR19 FELL WRAY IIstTIATIOes messunt uns:T g,

w I

i I

I I

I e

e w

as a

e a

e DRV4 FELL M M W Revision 3A 3/1/84 C9-1

FC/p-3 If suppression chamber pressure exceeds (17.4 psig (Suppression Casaber Spray Initiation Pressure)) but only if (suppression chamber temperature and drywell pressure are below the Drywell Spray Initiation Pressure Limit], [ shut down recirculation pumps and drywell cooling fans and] initiate drywell sprays (restricting flow race to less enan 720 gpa Maximum Drywell spray Flow Rate Limit)].

\\

FC/9-4 If suppression cnaaber pressure cannot be maintained nelow cne Primarg Containment Pressure Limit, snen irrespective of wnether adequate core cooling is assured If (suppression cnaaber temperature and drywell pressure are e

relow ene Drywell Spray Initiation Pressure Limit], (shut down recirculation pumps and drywell cooling fans and}

initiate drywell sprays [ restricting flow rate to less chan 720 gpa (Maximua Drywell Spray flow Rate Limit)).

SP/L-3.2 1.

Wnen suppression pool water level reacnes (17 ft. 2 in.

(elevation of bottot of Mark I internal suppression channer to drywell vakuum breakers less vacuum breaxer opening pressure in feet of water)) but only if (suppression cnaaber temperature and drywell pressure are below ene Drywell Spray Initiation Pressure Limit], [ shut down rec 1rculation pumps and drywell cooling fans ana) initiate drywell sprays (restricting flow race to less enan 720 gpa (Maxian Drywell Spray Flow Race Limit)].

Revision 3A c9-2 3/1/8'

9.2 INPUT DATA AND PHYSICAL CONSTANTS Note Some input parameters must be obtained from the calculated procedure of Section 8.0 in Appendir C.

It is therefore necessary to complete that section prior to calculating the Drywell Spray Initiation Pressure Limit.

T Lowest expected drywell spray 33 T

=4)

F temperature DS P

Containment negative design CND pressure (values greater than design may be used if justified psid by design margin)

P CND T

Temperature of the reactor building RB n~

cF during normal operation T

=

RB Y

Total free volume in drywell and 3

py v

= d'/.M ft vents py V

Total airspace volusie in wetwell g

at normal operating suppression 3

pool level V,

= //4 m f t DWSL Reduced drywell spray flow rate from Appendir C Section 8.0 if rate spray appropriate, to entry la required)

DWSL

=5 Mgym k

Revision 3A 3/1/84 C9-3

\\

1 E

ne mass flow rate of the drywell DW.SP sprays at rated conditions b 5F 8P" s

,$p he asas flow rate of the wetvell py C'

gpe sprays at rated conditions Qg,

=

.ne differential pressure for APv30 the wetwell-to-reactor building vacuum breakers at which the paid vacuum breaker is fully open oP VB0 AVB -R LCO area of the containment-to-C I*

reactor building vacuum breakers AVE C-R KVB Loss coefficient of each C-R containment-to-reactor building vacuum breaker KV3 C-R 3 bf-f t I

Cas constant for containment

= ff Ulbe *P atmosphere, excluding water vapor R,

h (Tpg)

Specific enthalpy of saturated

'Stu/lbs f

v h (TDS)

=

liquid at 7pg f

3 ft v (Tpg)

Specific voltme of saturated f

( S liquid at TD Pa at(TDS)

Saturation pressure of steam at 2

'I' T + ' >

Past(TDS)

P pg Revision 3A 3/1/8' C9-4

u,(TDS)

Specific internal energy of air at 4 - )3tu/lba

~~

u,(TDS)

=

T

gg OJ 44 0 < b~a )

u,( Tg3)

Specific internal energy of air at

=W/#

'f

'vf O[

u,(Tg3)

Etu/lba T

\\

gy

[e, i

f*; 2 R. s2.-

\\.

Reference internal energy to 0.0 Stu/lbs at a temperature of 0.0%.

Note that u

=h

- Py or u

=b

-RT (777.66 f t-lbf j a

a a

where h, is the specific enthalpy of air.

For example, at 80 F = 540%, h, = 129.06 stu/lbs I I*

Therefore u,= 129.06 Stu/lbs - 53.34

540'R x 73,g f Ibf

= 92.01 Revision 3A 3/1/84 c9-5

..------,-,,,---,-..-,,,--.e._,

9.3 TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION AND DTRIVATION OF TPE CAILUIATIONAL PROCEDURE 9.3.1 Introduction

~

Appendiz r, Sectiona 8.0 and 9.0 contain the calculational procedures f

which restrict the operation of Drywell sprays in Mark I/II l

c ontainment s. The procedures are:

8.0 Maximus Dr)well Spray Flow Rate Limit 9.0 Drywell Spray Initiation Pressure Limit for A.

Rated drywell spray flow B.

Nazimum drywell spray flow rate limit.

The plant unique implementation of the drywell spray restrictions will include either

(-

Spray at rated flow and a single limit curve which results from calculation 9.4A, or Spray at a restricted flow as calculated in Section 8.4 step 9 and a single limit curve which results fres calculation 9.4[.

9.3.2 containment-to-Reactor puilding AP Limit fo_r_

A.

Rated Drywell Spray Flow 3.

Maximus Drywell Spray Flow Rate Limit Under certain conditions the drywell and wetwell sprays could lower the total containment pressure such that the cortainment-to-RB negative design pressure differential limit is exceeded. The containeent-to-R3 vacuus breakers mitigate this effect and are factored into this Revision 3A 3/1/84 C9-6

calculational procedure. This procedure calculates the initial conditions, such that after the sprays cool the entire containment to the spray temperature the containment negative design pressure is not exceeded.

The calculational proedure assumes the following (1) Initially the wetwell is saturated and the drywell is full of ateaa.

(2) There are no containment-to-RB vacuum breaker f ailures.

(3) When the containment-tcHtB vacuus breakers open, the drywell is full of saturated air.

The final condition is defined by (15)

P = 14.7 - P f

CND and the air partial pressure la II6)

P,,f =P

-Psat(

f or (17)

P, f = 14.7 - P

-Psat(Tpg) g From the ideal gas law, the sir mass is P,,f (VDW + YM (18)

~

a,f R, (Tpg + 460)

Revision 3A C9-7 3/1/84

k 1

The final air mass, M,,g, that is distributed between the drywell and wetwell at the final condition, was originally in the watwell or was 4

If added to the containment thru the wetwell-to-RB vacuum breakers.

the total flow thru the vacuum breakers is Qt, then the initial air

]

pressure is i

(M

- %,t ) R, M + M f

l g

g W

P,,g = -

yW

\\

And the initial total pressure is (20)

= P,, g + P,,, ( T ) - 14.7 P

g g

where P is in psig.

g The tern Qt is the vacuum breaker flow times the time to depressurine the containment from the wehell-to-RB vacuum breaker Note that the full open pressure to the negative design pressure.

k time, t, is inversely proportional to the vacuum breaker flow times Werefore, the internal energy plus the spray flow times enthalpy.

calculation is performed twice; for rated spray flow and reduced spray flow.

An approximation is used for (t where Q is for containment pressure at its design value as defined in equation (21) and t is approximated by equation (22). The approximation was developed such that this hand calculational method matches the results from the more sophisticated computer calculation which was performed by General Electric in the development of this limit. It is not intended that kBt be an exact analytic derivation, but rather that it conceptually models the phenomena and gives reasonable results.

Revision 3 A 3/1/84 C9-8

4 The vacuum breaker flow is A

6,3 = W Y2 s,9 :P where M

sta

" y " R, ( kB +

60) and AP = Pg I

I A

c CND ata

+

(

- - kB "Y K

a The time is approximated by k

M,,f (u,(TVB0 ~ "a DS

"AVB "a (TR B'

O +W S P hf (TD S' D

where u,(T) = the specific enersy of the air at temperature T and g is referenced to 0.0 stu/lba at 0*R.

Note that if data is available for specific enthalpy, h,, the relationship u, = h, - Pv or u, = h, - R,T may be used to determine v,,

Revision 3A c9-9 3/1/8'

p gy,= The drywell and wetwell spray flow rate (eg,3, or 6

DW5L plus mWW,SP),and

= st*08P eric pressure = 14.7 psia.

h Pata

(..

1

}

Revision 3A 3/1/84 C9-10

i l

l 9.4 CALC WLTIONAL WORKSNEIT 1.

Determine the final air mass

paig P, f = 14.7 - P h - Pjg(Tpg)

=

P,*g

144 (V,+ V,)

N,f R, (TDS + 460)

M.,g

= i '3 1 >3

~

1be

=

a

_- y.,g

. ia - '.q,s. --=-

1 j ~r..~._

f ff3v '40' eb s 2.

Calculate the vacuum breaker flow AVB 2*32.2*P

144*14.78144 C-R CND "V B "

B+

KVB a

C-R

(

g,

=

- ib./see U

'.2 + J 2.) e j.s r' t

y +sy,7 a s y a p

f.5. 7 53.3Yun.*, ("S* %,o) h'va n IJ'/. o1 3.

Determine the total spray flow rate A.

Rated flow

(

g,+ (,3,)

0 13368 b SP (Rated) =

60

vg (Tg)

.)./j:2.43,s,l/his

*: s;.'s.:, i'i.-

- 0) " N ^^Eb'I***

//poo s'$.i;;e'? /O's.:eJic V SP

m. ?.' ic

.:r, / 3.. / ?

Revision 3A C9-11 3/1/84

5.

Beduced flow (DW5L + ( 'g,)

0 13368 E +W SF (Rated) =

,g v

T J D

f b

6,13368 ' i'* W Y?

'(f% 44 Q t

= l'?.?3 lba/sec hW SP (Reduced)

~

g

, o f gof 9 Y

)$g\\b 4.

Determine the conditions when the wetvell-to-RB vacuum breakers are full open V50 " 14*7 ~ OIVSO P

= / 7

./45 P

'I" V50 Z jd, b $

From steam tables determine w yt~

sat VRO " kl0 T

j;;/; = /s. 4 f4 V30 a / / = /*'. fo 7 From air tables determine "a kBO)

I 550 s //t,4 7 u,(b50) = //W'Stu/lba

? ?O. //h. /2 5.

Calculate the d.epressurisation time M,,,(u,(Tn o) ~ "a (7,g))

_ kB "a (kB + b W SP hUpg) g 2p3. 4.*

fA ' //d. ~ L * ?*? A / tlh IS A N' * *h "

J,

, f jj,.,

, ;.,a,. 2 n P

6. a 1ut.L.(o. -t -tr3777;c m :r7"- t77v v7 :.

Revisico 3A 4 f.u 3 3/1/84 Cb12

.,f, g _,

a

A.

For lated flow e (Rated)

=.k

sec t (Reduced)j ", M c B.

For Reduced flow 6.

Select values for the initial wetwell airspace temperature and enter in Tables C9-1 or C9-2. The values should range free normal operating pool temperature to wetwell design temperature and be sufficient to define a locus of points to be plotted on Figures C9-1 or C9-2 for rated or reduced

(

)

spray flow respectively.

in 7.

Calculate the initial pressure, P, g. for Tg Tables C9-1 or C9-2 (M,,f - %,t) R, U + 460 g

g-ai

~

144 8 V s

g (Ja d a - (,3v si)(s v.i.,)]

0. P ) * '%

/

, ~4)(r21uso)

[ T; ~ 4:0}

e S ov:*

where t = t (Rated) for rated spray flow in Table C9-3, and t = t (Reduced) for reduced spray flow in Table C9-4.

ut(T ), for each 8.

Determine the saturation temperature, p g

initial toeperature and enter in Tables C9-1 or C9-2. (_)

Revistos 3A C9-13 3/1/84

Calculate the initial total pressure in the suppression 9.

chamber, P, from the followins equation and enter in g

(

Tables C9-1 or C9-2.

= P,,g + F,,t(T ) - 14.7 P

g g

10. Plot T and P from Table C9-1 on Figure C9-1 or from g

g Table C9-2 on Figure C9-2. This is the Drywell spray Initiation Pressure Limit for rated or reduced drywell (I) spray flow rates respectively.

1 k

f l

Revision 3A 3/1/34 C9-14

Table C9-1 (RAT E FLOW)

(6)

(7)

(8)

(9)

Pg (pois)

P,,,(T ) (peia)

,,g (pois) g ('F) p T

g

, 11.o4 7 4

zo w9 99 L 3.2 0 les $3

l. 0 f0 L u. 4 2

/. (, 917 9

.s o

1.

4 L t. s' y l'

[LC tu

? : s*

g y,,

zwa 20.o!

<A..

YO. 3 J z,'.

Ji go 4 9. 1 4 0 d d 'l 2 *L U

17. f r

29..' ~3

2. ? 0 7/>7 cr e, / r 6 r /. IT-Table C9-2 (RDUCD FLOW)

(6)

(7)

(8)

(9) g (peig)

P,,,(T ) (psia)

P T FF)

P,,g (peia) g g

Ns N

\\

0

%N, t)l6 Revision 3A c9-15 3/1/84

A.

t-..

8 9

.....u,

=

.=....

.....d-

-. = =

..-_-.-4..

m

=.._....=m..m

.- g

== w mme

-......=-...

u--

g..,.

m

.m

==-

.....i.

.p..=._

.=.=.=mmm.

...m.

. - = =.-

.==m w........

.. =..--

.........-m-

.ma.

_9....m..m..g.--

.....m.m.s g.

.e.

--.4

.mmm... (.=mem.m.mm.mme. -_. :

d_

~

.... -. = =

s

.. - _--- =_

,--..I.e.........

w W = - _ -

4

.....g__

'~

..e......

9-

.-= _

= = = _

eu-.

4.-.

.4..

9.=.._

._..e.

y

..m..

4==

.s..-==-

..A._

..g....u.-q..-..g..e.

.=-==.4

.m

-. =..

1

..=m m

S

_=_=_-

=-w.=--.-,.

_r-

- ~ - _.

in..$

4.....-d-..=m..,.

.-..a.----

q"--

(._

9-

_...-(-

-.4..-.

J- - -

1

-~

%,. 3 n

pg_

O

-M-..,..--.Q'..._

s.-_

m.

-.-i-9.._

m.....i..m....eq.-.m.e...-..

..s h

p s.

-e.

-=

.f,..

==_

y..

4__

.=umm._-.

b.

mm...m==

lE~..............".e....

I.........me.e..u.n.

........I.. - _.

4 -.

e

..q...

4 I m.>.=.... I.....

.d..........

,9. _

a_

..... - - - ~... -.

,f

........ -.. e ie

...=..=.=.=.......7.=.=.-..

. _ __ - - -.s.a..

em---

....4._'

.. _- 4

..e

-........e......1.p..._

y..

...e.

g

.= _

4

.....me..._... _....= _....

...e....w mn..

..mm...m.....=,...m.

...{

.4__.

...mm....,....

-e........

....me.-

-n..u e-..

. e

. ex-=m m...s7.. d..........

..$m.--.=-.

.m u.

....m...

.mm..

__-m.-.-

..m m.....

......=-em.

..i...e...

.m.4

-un

.m.

....4...

W...............-.....4....

...=ms.,mm...__

s m.. _

o

... = = =...

-e.-... e.-4..

..=--.s=...m.gr.........

.e..==-.7....

-==m..-

.. min..-==.e.

........... -......... =. am

.e mme.=..-a......... -....

. = = _

2.

m..

.......m..............

-u--.

.-=.e.._

u...

................e.e..

. e...

=.4,.

..=.e

- eema-

.e-

.-...mm.mmm.

. -=.*_.

m..

m

.me..._

.....(-

...e...-

.=-.e..mm... -....... _.. - - -

i

.=.

e l

g 3

.4

..-=.4_

.. =

sum.imme..-...+........_

umme _

..m..

..e.

gg

..s.

..s.m...=---9..

..-=m-.

e...........

a e

.....3..-.4.....

-e s.

. +

e.........

a.

-4..

.u........g....

p.,..

...e._..

.......4..-a

.e..........4..,

..mi..

e,ns......

q

- - = = = _

.%.~e....... = =.... = - -.

.3

.J._

... - _ - 4 _-

-e-6...

..,.......m.

. - e...mm.mmm

.. a.me. _ _..

..-mm..

.......--4.._.

.m e -

n.

i... -

....m..e

~.

=.=-..

e-

.4 I.

.......... 4.............

.o.

p

.-.e

.o...-

....-m.+.

..s

)

.... 4...........

..=*.

e.

-.-e.

......g......

e..

.................=.mm

..o e.

o

- =.. = =

=...

L.......

. = = =.

3 g..

-.....-.q.

mo.

...d......*I.....-.m.

-.....e................

-r g.....,.........

.e

....x e..

....w 9.....m=

.. = - -

....1

. _..e..

. 4

m. _^ =m.

=..in.e..e m

........m..... = - -

a

.b=

.a

.-=

...m.

...-.=4 m.

...o........

.m e...

m.

...i.

p.

9..

4.

.-.-4..+9..-

.......r..-in 9

- =..-..

e-

-= = =. _ -

.mm.

. =...........

-n..._

. =

~. _ -.... - -

t

- n_.

.........-,..-g.._

e s

e is a

as a

a e

a m

. ~...

sumsesom enmesa PMaums Wel Drywell Spray Initiation Pressure Limit Figure C9-1.

(C9.A Containment-to-R3 AF Limit for Rated Spray)

Revision 3A 3/1/84 c9-16

-. - _ _.. _.,,,, _ _ - _. - _ _ _ _ _ - ~,.

.4ean= a=amo e em e meae.ndam e eme __

amm.ee W m==

e.

--e== ene. -- e a m.es....

--en e

' es

n.. een a e em a e emummen= - eo=- - -

. emo..

as..ees e amme.u.m.e.=amo e em.am.o. e=.=. e -

..a.e.===ee e

e e.- ease

-, =

- ee as

- -ed..===

s=mo e.n. mem em e

'.-me-.---

em ammain mene a-ue->

e.==. *. e.e_..e.se.e.

e m.. - e, _.ammme e em. <a.

ee-e..

e.im.e

> an e.e.e w w

-e.-

en ee

.. en. -

suome

.e ee._e.ee.

4 -....

._e-

-~ eume"*

m.eamusee. 4 e e se a em

=====. e e.mmme

..e e me ea... e emme M r

e

- e e e emme - e e and e.use..

e - e.e = a em - -

'-me =w*"".

ammme e am man - - > =

._ en.,e ame..

.. emu.ne. e mn-a ein numamm e.e

-m se sammed e amme.um em

.e. e.e me y

s.e. e.m_2 e e_ mum e man, w a.mm 3

g me_

emman e.m_m e.. o e. e e, et

.e e..

- ee e

.e.e..e suenena -

e

--e.

4e -

_e e

en. e e_

__.ee..g

.m - e e.e_

ee

.. ems. -.. e e.n e.. e mm _. - = - en m-e seem ame e. een am....-.e.. -y -

e e om.mm e

-e,,,e q

..== 4.e esame..eee ee e.

mede.. e ese

..m e.

.ame e

4

e. mego

..h e.

. -e a. eg

-e-.

e I~a.m. e e...

..emummam m

m

.i== e

.===. emme ame. e. n... e.e..eDe===

.monu ausnum m ano exame ap.e emumm e man _

6 em mm e

.m.sm.. e.o. em _--..e,-----

ees.m e.m amme au mm-

===De

. e amem

-.. e e es e 4 e.m.me....

m. aame e e een e. esse. ene.. e.m

,s

..ame..=ameneM

- = =.

e.e-.

= ande amme o e.

men Mr

-e a-->.en e ee. e. e==.e=====... odee ee emmemo m.=a.m.

=.

an== - ee e.n =-

p e-ee een.

eam me am --m4....e.m.e.e.e....e.

...q.

... e.. een

-s- =e es--se e me.

" emus an.emmm. e.

mm e e e ___

>==e-e.en a= =.mm e-s -..== e4 m e. e. m mee e me en me.ee e== ammme imm.

name m e an e e==

e..e-,-

.e m.m -

.e.====.= eee-im em-e 4 e-se e.e.e

. ee m e,.=

e.

. amu.s.ea=mu--m e.e...

-ee =

.=e

--..i,--.p oass dia-.. _

==amme emanamee.o-o e eem e.

e. e.ee. a.mm.me..

e sub e

em e s

. o e..m e

.. e..== ama e

.e. me as

- m m - e.mm e

e.a.-e..

me amo e.

..en...e amme--in...

e a===

m..-en a - em..

&=

Me ede

.. m e..e me.

.emm. W

.e

- es _

ene e memo 4 ee e omdemme a-e see eme=== y.euse mm aus eJ

.m see

- - e. e memme em --e.s.me..mamm este amme e em mme==, _

.e.m um em eeen e e. emmem==.ee

.ee ame.am...e..==um e=

. = =.

e-.q--

e en -

,im.me m. am.m

m. e. e. a.

==.

om..

e.a m - em

.e

.n e men

e.... e. - e e m e ustoee.e-m e emeee-

,em e

- memme e

-.m.e. e...a.me=.e..ex-me.m im.m

..e-e de end

. eee ese-e es e eme.e.-e e.

.. e. e.-m am eemmee

.en. em.e e

...am.. e..a g. en e me e.

ase e o. ame.

.. m e. ee.

p e.m %

>=m

-use ee.

ae. mum asumme me. a=... e..

- e se.e. e e examme.

p

- e. e-4

..m...au--s.

e e-e... e.nse.m.--e emme.

.e.

e.

em.

smuumeesong....

e e me en..

le ee e e e-- em e

e

.s e

e

-amme w

.e e. e a e.

.m e e o

meme - - e..

e e.

e... e. e n e.

e ee e. se.e. e en-

.se.eeem.o..

.e e e em

. e Ie=.

-e.

ma anwe.mmm eem--n am _

em e.- e e..-..

o_

..ee

.e.s.

..e..emmee,e e..

mee..

e..

en e

.....o..e.

. e een.me.e e e - en

.. = -

am.m.e.e. m.me e me-e. m e am -.- em. a

.,. e e s e e.. e. e mma

,,em e.-

men e e ame,e-e 8

e. e

.y-ee. e e.e.m.e emme e e. emme. emmeeme.

o.. e en e. m. mans =. =e 4 =. =. em..

e me e enn

.e...

am o m.. e a.mm e-

-.9..

- e.e.n e m-se.

..o e 1H _....

e.

.=

ee. eee.e m.ee.

e e ase ammee a seame===e e.en.en-.

se..m e,eee e.

.eee e

..eee

.e e e. e.

=.a.m.

am ee e.

. n. e.e. s.ee e. e=== - ao amm e

em.

. enemmm..emmme -

em. en e e

e e e

e

-e 4 m enum.

. em

. _._ e.m e

=

.m

.e..

e......_...e e..-..

e. e.e

.. ee

.e._

e

.e eme.- es..

.ee

_e.

m e en e amam--e.n

e.. e me..

. e.=eens e.em.m.e.. e.. e e. e. a.m. 9. =em e e.

.e, ao een,.=...e_

ammam amm e

.. men..an.e an. ee. e..

emmen amm.

am e

e

..o. - ese e.e e.

.eee e me e e..-e

e..e.. e. e e e.m. m. e..em. e. een.em e.. g..e e.. nemme.e.

===e

.. e w e en em.

w e e e.

... = e.,. e se.e seem. e

.. e== e. e-

e. mme..--..ee een.

ee..

. e se a e em a

ese

. mm e e adme.emp -. einem.e-e

.ee.

-.m e

emm en e

e

.o

.e am. e ed ee,m q en am ams eee, -._

ammame

e. mmme e. mum. m me monump

.. e _ m.e..s e_n e.

ename - e ee==me - enom em e

amm.

ese use

,e.

ee.*ee en e.en.-

o.

s e

um m e. e =.

e ee emme am ee.. em.

e e es esmo amm e==.== en* _e

.e.e

. emp *

a.us

.m.e.4ememme_as e== ee. e_ e. e e emm _ - e e.. -.e.en.ma e e.me ee.ex. enemismo 4

- w9

.e amo ammmeems e o-es ge em am..e e. e

.e

..e-neum d..

...... _ em e e e.m.ame. an ee_e mum e os -

ammunumme e e eo 9. e e ee se e.

e.m

...ene... e.

_am.. e..e eam==..

eew e e

ae ee

.. an.

e

.. essasse

...e.me ammme.. _. -

eee_...aoe se emeae.m em.

e e. en =.=.9 e.. en m.e.

e.m. e. e ammee emed..e _ en en _ u.ma amam e

oe a a.m amme o e anos e.==. eme enummme ames as s

.e

e. e.

e es

..e se. e

o. ene... em. _ e..

s.m. e.. e. sem.se..

= =.

e esa se s.e ee e.

an.ne. n. e...

4. me. n.o.. e.e. o -_g. e,. e. me.ede e e== ease $ e =e o e am-==

eu n

g se _ e amme ee em o e......_

e_^

--e

..ese

. = = _

.esee.e e,

.. e _.. a.mme. e ens.. m.e. es, e m

.e

.... - e_

e e

b.aus en.en s -

e e -

am

.e ee.m emum. e, e.

e e = ess me... e.. es mo e... _ en _ ee.__

.ee....a em

.o..

1B 3..

e e.mmmme m o.m.mseee-een 4 se

. me a. o. e,me e i

.e

.ee g.

. a e e emo.. e. e. to. emuun.....emme

.e.

. m.

e. s.sem e.n.e e.e,.ee emme _-.

e e

.mune j

e e me e

e. me se. e es. eso e_e.e e-un. e.e. n_

- -.i..

e.a9.e

.e.e o e..e_

e.. ee. _.e.

e e4 me. _

se.e. e e e.. en ee ma e _

men _o e am _== e e...e. _==,. amo.. emm.e e e.

em

.. - me e

==

eeene..

ame

- e en

..e e

e me e g e.een e.

e. s. e.. m e. e. e e._... em.e.m.e. e

__eme ee em

^

...e gg,..

.e. e e e -.

a mo ee.e.e.

e.ee. me ee. e_e e.

em me e.... e. 4m e

ee - _

ee--,.

ese.

6

.em em ege =

..=e_m._-._ _ _.e.

. e._... e me enge _.. e.e e..

_e e -

._.e.e.e-.=

.........e_.

..e e ee.e _

.m......e......

e.e. e.n e. m...o.._

o......_...e.,_.e.._.

_eme...

. - en e e

_.oe.__.-

._e._.__se_

e..m. _ e. _ e e..

.ee

....._ _ _ e...._...ee

.. _. _...._e oo _....ee.ma.. _. _

-e e

_e,._e e_..

c-ome_--_.

-_e.=e....me..

e=

.e

... :... e......_.fe.m.e..._-

2e_

m _.-_...e.

..._.em. e...e e. n......

.e..-

... eo__.. _ese.

-- e

.e....e.t....._.

ee

.....e

_.e._.m..._2_......

._e..t....__._....._.t...._. me. _. e e

... e se me_ee.

m._._.-...e_._=.o.

.t.

____m

_._m.

e

.. e e..o. e_.

..e. _....

_e e.

ee_..._.

.._.m.e.....

ee

_e..,.___

e...._

m em e. _..., e _.

......... m _._.

........e_..

_._a..e_. e.e m.....

.......e.....

_. em.e.. e.... _.

_.e_.._.._m.m

.ee.

e_e_e_e_._.

e_.

.....ee.._

me ee. e.. _ e.e.

. e em..e..._...e.__._e.e._..

e.

.-._=_..e....._.._e.m._._....e..._em.. _e

_._g e_. e e.e

._._ -. e n

._.e._.._.

e s

1e is s

Js as a

e e

e a

m e.

surmasi cessam enssount wel I

Figure C9-2.

Drywell Spray nitiation Pressure Limit i

(C9.3 Contains t-to-KB AP Limit Reduced Spray) i Revision 3A I

3/1/84 C9-17 l

l l

rO

p ENCLOSURE 3 1

APPENDIX C CALCULATIONAL PROCEDURES j

14.0 PRIMARY CONTAINMENT PRESSURE LIMIT 14.1 APPLICABLE GUIDELINE STEPS PC/P-6 If suppression chamber pressure cannot be maintained belou the Primary Containment Pressure Limit, then irrespective of whether adequate core cooling is assured...

~

L Prunwy Contaime :t Presswa Lir it E

Ee k

f0

?

0 H.6 J4. 6 Prunel, Contaf e est m eer Leve! (ft.)

PC/P-7 If suppression chamber pressure exceeds the Primary Containment Pressure Linit, vent the primarg containment in accordance uith (procedure for containment venting] to reduce and maintain pres-sure belou the Primrg Containment Pressure Limit.

C14-1 Revision 3 (draft) 6/1/83

14.2 INPUT PARAMETERS AND FHYSICAL CONSTANTS i

E Elevation corresponding to the gy,y g suppression pool water level assumed in FSAR transient analyses *

[ g,,.

^ f*

E SP.F W P

M8Xi8Um Pressure at which the SC. MAX suppression chamber is not expected to fail with suppression pool water level at ESP.FSG Psig P

SC. MAX E

Elevation of the suppression chamber SCPI pressure instrument top *

'E E

SCPI

(

b

Elevation 0.0 is defined to be the bottom of the suppression pool.

C14-2 Revision 3 (draft) 6/1/83

14.3 TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION AND DERIVATION OF THE CALCULATIONAL FROCEDURE The Primary Containment Pressure Limit is the maxima pressure at which failure is not expected to occur at the most limiting containment location. Calculation of the limit is based on the same considerations discussed in the Primary Containment Design Pressure calculational pro-cedure Appendix C. Section 13.

If the maximum allowable pressure is g

substituted for design pressure, the two procedures are identical.

I NOTG To NR C tl Gv1G v> G st.S :

S E CTIC AJ 13 IS ATT A Cd CQ 70 M W MCLCSJAG t

(

i i

J 5

,I l

l l

I C14-3 Revision 3 (draft) 6/1/e3

l l

14.4 CALCUIATIONAL %f0RK.EEET l

Plot Point h on Figure C14-1 at coordinates 1.

(r., F i r.C.mx)-

N 31

/ hp.- f 1

I 2.

Calculate F. the suppression chamber pressure at Point h on Figure C14-1.

Ff=P

-ESP.FSAR)

~

3 SC. MAX SCPI g

/ /J. %

psig P

=

g 4

ifo-O.U33fGS~CJ-M37

= //T. 5 PlotPoint@onFigureC14-1atcoordinates 3.

(EsCPI'P!)*

s

(

JSs3 b) /ff 1-fu C14 4 Revision 3 (draft) 6/1/03

1 4.

Complete construction of the Primary Contalment Pressure Limit Curve se followes (1) ExtendahorisontallinefromPointhtothe graph's vertical axis.

/

(/)

I

/

(2) Layout E.

7 (4

I 4

(3) Extend a horizontal line to the right from Pointh.

j (4

f

(

I v

i C14-5 noviaise 3 (draft) 4/1/03

"L7D

-tec

-__2 I

FIGURE C14 1 PRIMARY CONTAIMENT PRESSURE I.IMIT

-.t.' '

1 1

I I

__ _.i.

1 I

.w pse-

/ 90

~

i 1

n._

. _n,N.J-

.._4

. _4..-

_a

.____.a

_..~

I 30- -

. + _.. _,

.~.

.... ~.

_m

._3

.. q. _

_1.._

.w,

_ _a.~_ _

l70-

...3..._

4 _..

.._.5_.... _ _,. _...__4___

= _ _. _

...:r_.

_. _4

+..

_.._ p_ _

._.4_._.

.., J,.___.

4

_.a

.. ~..

1 1

a. _..~

--' -', _".~--' ~..

~

.m

- - ' ' - ~ ~

1

~ ~ ' '

1 1_- - ' _-

8, /50

. _ _1_... _

_ 4

.4.._.

1

_ r, __

z._.

-__3

_ _4 1

g,

.__.1..

v..,

m,._-

J

. _. _ L. _..

._ _=

.._n 30

_.__ _.t...

..t__

=

. =.,

gn m

m..

.....m

~-

- - - - -~~~~"

I10

~

=..

.u m

I O

10 20 30 40 SO 60 70 to 90 100 j

Primary Ceutatament Water Leal (f t)

C14-4 Revisten 3 (draft) 6/1/83

lP APPENDIX C I '

CALCULATIONAL PROCEDURES t

13.0 PRIMARY CO M AIIDfEfff DESIGN FRESSURE 13.1 APPLICABLE GUIDELINE STEFS FCIF-5 If esqpression chober pressure cannot be mintained belou (the Prinzry Contaiment Design Freneure), RPV PLOODING JS REQUIMD.

=

/

H.5 ~

% Ceitei m t Dee(p Preeews b

l l f

0 0

18.8 N.S

% settefemmt kaser leve! Ift.)

C6-6 When esqpression chenber preneure can be mintained botcu the Prbury Contalment Dreigrn Pnneure, enter (procedure developed frm the MrY Control Mdetine) at (Steps R:/L and MC/r-4) and eneoute these steps concurrentty.

i l

l t

i C13-1 Revielen 3 (draft) 6/1/03

13.2 INFtT! FAlWtETERS AND FNYSICAL CW5 TAN 75 E

II"I'" " "' "4A8 "' Ih' SP,FSAR suppression posi veter level assumed in FSAR transient analyses *

/ j.f..

'~ft K

=

gy,yggg P

SWPPression chamber design pressure SC.D (defined with suppression pool weter level at R$t.F8M)

P'I8 P

SC.D

. Elevation of the suppression ISCFI chamber pree nte instrument tap

II R

SCFI 1

i 1

1 i

et.levatten 6.0 is defined to be the bottom of the wppreseien peo2.

C13-2 Revision 3 (dref )

6/1/s3

13.3 TECENICAL DESCRIPTION AND DERIVATION OF TEE CALCULATIONAL FROCEDIRE l

The Primary Containment Design Pressure curve derates the standard design pressure (PSC.D) for 8uPpression pool water levels above that assumed in design calculations (ESP.FSAR}'

\\

Below ISP.FSAR. the standard design pressure is valid. The design pressuretotheleftofPointhonFigureC13-1isthereforeconstant.

Eigher suppression pool water levels azert an increased hydrostatic head upon the bottom of the suppression pool at the rate of 0.433 psi per foot of water level increase.

Since this increased pressure cannot be detected by instruments located above the water surface, the design pressure must be derated by 0.433 psi /ft the slope of E in Figure C13-1.

Once suppression pool water level reaches the elevation of the suppression chamber pressure instrument tap (ESCP1}' '"#E A""#**'

I" I

- - - - I" head will be sensed directly by the instrument. Continued deration is thereforeunnecessaryandthepressuretotherightofPointhin

(

Figure C13-1 is constant.

Throughout these calculations it is assumed that the limiting containment I **

location with respect to static pressure is below ESP.FSAR*

limiting location is above E3p,7 g. plant-unique modifications to the calculational procedure will be required.

C13-3 Revision 3 (draft) 6/1/33

Wff/

4 s

.Io c

.2 I.

ESP,FSAR SCPI Suppression Pool Level k

/-

SCPI l

f E

SP, FSAR

-g t

E

=0 3p Figure C13-1.

Primry Containment Design Pressure C13-4 Revision 3 (draft) 6/1/83

13.4 CALCUIATICEAL WORKSHEET 1.

Plot Point on Figure C13-2 at coordinates (ESP.FSAR' SC.D

j (D

'J 7.,

& 2 p.- s y

2.

Calculate P C, the suppression chamber pressure l

st Point on Figure C13-2:

l S

SC.D SCPI SP.FSAR}

=P

- 0.433 (E

~

E71 Psig

< P SC c

.- w b5 ~ E 'II '~ '* SI ~ '" J )

C *

- J 7. ~Z-Plot Point h on Figure C13-2 at coordinates 3.

(ESCPI. SC *

/

(D jy,y 1

( 1. s ;.r ?

C13-5 Revision 3 (draft) 6/1/83

4.

Complete construction of the Primary Containment Design Pressure Curve as follows:

(1) Extend a horizontal line from Point @

a to the graph's vertical axis.

(/)

(2)

Layout E.

(/)

(

(3)

Extend a horizontal line to the right from Pointh

(/)

Cl3-6 Revision 3 (draf t) 6/1/83

130 FIGURE C13-2 PRIMARY CONTAIMENT DESIGN PRESSURE 11R 100.-

h__

90. -

n

' - ~ ~ -

3 80'-

. _ -. - + _ - -.

e, _- __. - _. -

n y

o

___._4,.___..._ m,..

.__.4 1 _ _ -

-- - 4

~#-

4_

u

~

" 3 ___-- ~ ~ -

"-~'" -

g 70- _-

~--' " ~

.___-}____.-

ya

.y........ _,... _ -

_ _ 2 _. _._._.

1

.__.2

---a...

1 1

,u

___._ j. _._ _

4...._. _. _.

._ _n -

.___ t<. _. _pZ _.__.. _ _._.__1._._.

____j.

_.4____. ____

w

_.-f n

_ _ _.1....-

r i

.. %.. __. _ _. _ __a v

-, __... m _ _...

. _.. L

._N.. _.C%..

4.__.. _w

-u_

_ _-1

- _-.4 1

l _.

....J,.._.

c

.R

_._ j -.. _.. t. __..... _

3 4

4 -

._.4 1_

._i___.

g 5

i o

o r

__A___

... 4 u

o,

.__.3.

o.

v 1

i m

.__-.__p.____._g 40, i

3

...,f _.._

t

...._._3_..._

,)

..__j__.....,. _ _._ _

. _ _1

.1

_a 20--

._~

10 --

.=.

__4 _ _.__ _..

.m...-...,.._-.

)

1i 0

1) 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 ii 1

i Primary Contaiment ninter Level (f t)

C13-7 Revision 3 (draft) 6/1/83

ENCLOSURE 4 f

fi

.. ~.,, _ - - - - -

i HEAT CAPACITY TEMPERATURE LIMIT l /

I,

/

ggygggggiggyjg

- wwymys

~ e S

16 0 ggg i

ld EJ 15 0 i-l b

1<10 i

5 13 0 8

w j

12 0 j

j q, ze<>

.,<>e ;> ;;

<><,e.w,x>e

,< m sm>

e

1 o

Y' \\$k'/

SSM

,7

' N

\\\\

Y Mx3'&idN\\

~

a i2

!NGMW EMGMMM a

1 i ' E M G k' M ihn

s Nh l

,\\

x t3NMx'N&h'x'\\h' is

$bbbb'N h

MWM 1

MMMM$

1

\\

Z E

9 9

D 9

9 I

?

D 9

i (1.:i) 13A31832WVHO N0lSS3BdenS

P

?,

~

h\\

RNNNJ.

^

NA ig

,a

\\\\sy,.

s

\\ s I

hN

\\

=

h

's

!ds'Nk

$9:

2 ss, s xs s

a u\\x s\\\\

s H

z h v 4^x\\

li 8

M NN'g

=

g g s sN

'\\ xx 2-h \\\\N '

IN\\

l

$I

.N K'N x\\h hxx m g'm M Meh~

MEMh'Mh u 8

8 8

e a

to v

v n

m a

a i

U. ) 3Eniv836W31 T12MAEG

9 N'\\\\'N NN.

s k

e Mil L:

i h3M

!M2

i i EP

,i

!MRms

@G@MiB

^

L MWR S

Li

?

8 R

e t%

(DISd) 3MnSS3Md M3EMHO NOISS3NddnS

C N N'N NNy x N]x'g\\

j s

s

\\ \\

s

>fb

\\\\

\\\\ -N'\\\\'

I s

,N\\\\'

')\\!\\

b l

gi R%'4N'N'$xN'J$

l I

f xbkN.'isk\\NN' g

5 n $q q % 'tWshh 62 s P' x

\\

Z x 's'si

\\

o

'\\ s xb e w\\

D ['s\\'N

\\\\

i-4 $

$ 'NN M'skM I!

s' 9

\\

'\\\\'\\ \\'k NN NN N\\\\Nsh s

O

\\

i O-0-

k o ONO R

8 Co m

m a

mom-

? ?2 (CISd) 3MnSS3Md M25WVH3 NOISS3MddnS

ilEAT CAPACITY LEVEL LIMIT 20 19 18 17 E

16 tis 15 B

4 K.

_i

^

13 1

MAk i

'~ V M W 4B w

/

}

/j

' h,s

/

,/

/,

/ ///// ////f///:'////

l

/

/,

/

"g/,5e7,997/;;g,a //;yy //<// % w /y;;

/

"O D % G M, G M H,, 2/1; W W m 'i M O

S 10 15 20 25

.50 l')

40 in 50 Dl'L i A I EMPE RA I URL l o Il lE i lC I L ( "I )

=

r O

r-h l

i i

x i

N I

__J IN l

l I

I I

N l

I,-

I s

i i,

,s ix <>

_c y

s i

s 1

, 3 i

i

\\

i i

i-36 y

i s

i i

i t

x i

I a

z 5

l l

i

'i i

2

\\

l E

g

\\

o i

j l

o i

o ~=

u a

z

~,

m D

l l

l Is l

E y

I i

i I\\

i i

U l

I Zl 1

l i

f

~

O I I

I i

i l

l

\\

l l

C y.

i

\\

t Si l

\\

l

-i

+

h.

1 E

b X

o 2l

?

I 1

t i

i I

J l

I l

i

{

I!

l l

l '.

l I

I '\\

i O

D O

A O

v n

n m

N

~

Nl/4) 1:74R 3/ill AE3AOONn 3E00 An, NIXY 74

PRIMARY CONT AINMENT DESIGN PRESSURE

/,

MMV Msgpn g g(61 M MM fgggggygg mmw g 7 A VAmMW9 57 Y'

l' A

50 3

40 8

1 30 20

~~-

- - ~ ~

10 O '0-~~

S 10 15 20 25 30 55 40 4S 50 l'RIMARY CONI AINMI NI W A l f R 11 VI i (l il

DR'r WE_L SPR AY 'N

!.4-lON ?-

5 5L2 E '_ '/c 300-

/

/'*

'l

, g,,M MfdM%K Wn

3MitVJMW#"'

l

\\

e enzaw

\\

!l03fff49%f l

!fMMV

iPMwi i

?dM2

\\

! M#

l b,h,'h,h'f l////,/$

\\

80 Vl// / '/ {,

///

\\

l

\\

V

\\

~" O 10 20 30 40 50 cv 69 Su,0FFE55!ON C-AV5ER :: ESSURE (.:5;G)

D M f E S SE M f M l.

tRMMMMM

!Rh3%MMENE l S $ N h1 M MM Lz

!EMMMME

_i

O5'%Ix'$\\%%\\\\'D'86Ry\\bhN3 s

N ii (J

\\ \\\\

'\\

N\\\\ ik Jb

\\'\\

b 4

N kb bhhhb l M Q M W

s s w% %g n h

~

a

\\

10 a

c a

ci c o

e o

o a

'S 3

I gO O

?

9 9

U. ) 3bn1Yb3cW31 100d NOISS3beenS

ENCLOSURE 5 I

I I

t

OP-AP.2Z-001(Q)

ATTACEMENT 2 SYSTEM OPERATING PROCEDURE GUIDELINE Scope The purpose of this guideline is to illustrate the format and As define the content of the system operating procedures (SOPS).

such, this guideline will first define the purpose of the SOP and then provide a discussion of the content and format of the j

various sections of the SOP.

Purpose The SOP should provide step by step instructions for filling, starting up, shutting down, changing modes, energizing,

venting, and other operational evolutions necessary for the proper operation of a plant system.

Procedure Format and Content _

I The SOPS shall utilize the procedure format delineated in Station Administrative Procedure SA-AP.22-001(O), Preparation and 8

As such, the procedure shall Approval of Station Procedures. utilize the (c) lowing items / sections in the order pr

- Title Page

- Table of Contents

- Purpose (Section 1.0)

- Prerequisities (Section 2.0)

Precautions and Limitations (Section 3.0)

Equipment Required (Section 4.0)

- Procedure (Section 5.0)

- Attachments (Section 6.0)

- References (Section 7.0)

- Physical Attachments With Each of the above mentioned items are discussed separately.

the exception of the title page and table of contents, the items are numbered consistent with the manner in which they would appear in the procedure.

Title Pace:

The title page format shall be consistent with that given on Form 1 in this guideline.

The procedure title shall be consistent with that which appears in the Operations Department Procedure Index.

Table of Contents:

The table of contents format shall be consistent with that given on Form 2 in this guideline.

Rev. 0 OP-AP. 2 2-001( Q )

1 of 15

OP-AP.22-00 A(Q)

ATTACEMENT 2 1.0 PURPOSE This section shall give an accurate description of the While the purpose should be purpose of the procedure. stated concisely, it should provide the operato information to clearly identify the intent of the procedure.

Example 1.0 PURPOSE _

This procedure outlines the steps necessary for the startup, shutdown, and operation of the Containment Atmosphere Control System.

2.0 PREREQUISITES This section shall identify the conditions which must exist or actions required to be performed prior to performing The guidelines for various sections of the procedure.

prerequisites are as follows:

t Prerequisites can include but are not limited to the a.

following:

- Completing valve / damper lineups

- Completing electrical lineups

- Ensuring support systems in service The prerequisites should be grouped according to the Thus all procedure sub-section to which they apply.

b.

prerequisites for performing subsection 5.1 of the procedure will be grouped under subsection 2.1 of the prerequisite section with each individual prerequisite being numbered, in this case, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, etc.

following note shall be included at the beginning The c.

of the prerequisite section.

2.0 PREREQUISITES NOTE 2.0 Prerequisites within a subsection may be performed in any order.

Rev. 0 2 of 15

@P-AP. 2 2-001( Q )

OP-APo33-vvay, ATTACRMENT 2 The prerequisites for completing valve / damper / root 4

valve / breaker lineups shall reference the appropriate d.

The guidelines for preparing attachments to the SOP.

the attachments are given in paragraph 6.0 of this guideline.

Support systems shall be referred to as being "in e.

service" if required.

the specific reason why a prerequisite is If possible, f.

required should be included.

Example The RACS system is in service and capable of supplying flow to the extruder / evaporator booster pumps.

Prerequisites should not be overrestrictive.

g.

j.

PRECAUTIONS AND LIMITATIONS 3.0 a

This section shall provide a listing of all generic and system specific precautions and limitations which the operator should be cognizant of in performance of theIn ad procedure.

interlocks and trips.

All major system componentprecautions shall be repeated in the proce The as necessary to assure safe system operation.

guidelines for precautions and limitations are as follows:

The Precautions and Limitations section shall bePrecautions (3.1),

~

a.

divided into three subsections:

Limitations (3.2), and Interlocks (3.3),

The following statement shall appear as b.

3.2.1 in all SOPS:

"All steps within each subsection of this procedure are to be completed in sequence unless otherwise specified."

~

For potentially contaminated systems, the following standard precaution shall be included:

c.

l

~

_ system contains potentially Contact RP for any "The radioactive contaminated fluid.

additional precautions and equipment required for fill and vent."

Rev. 0 3 of 15 OP-AP.22-001(Q)

OP-AP.44-uuAty, ATTACEMENT 2 All major component trips / auto starts shall be included d.

in this section.

If the procedure requires a somewhat out-of-the-ordinary task which may not be covered under e.

a statement to standing Radiation Work Permits (RWP),

such effect shall be included as a precaution.

i Precautions with regard to technical specifications To avoid f.

should be provided when applicable.

misinterpretation of the technical specifications, the

~

specification should not be paraphrased or even written However, some identification terminology should out.

be included along with the specification number.

Example Observe the Standby Liquid Control System 3.1.2 Operability requirements of Technical Specifications 3.1.5.

For all systems with valves, the following limitation g.

shall be included:

l "If valve lineup cannot be completed as required, the SNSS/NSS shall determine whether the deviations are such that the system should not be placed in service or standby, as required."

4.0 EQUIPMENT REQUIRED This shall list all special equipment or tools required to Additional guidelines for this perform the procedure.

section are as follows:

is In cases where some type of communication equipment required to carry out the SOP, the preferred a.

communication device should be stated but also qualified by saying "or equivalent."

Example Refueling PA system or equivalent is required...

4.1 is required is not necessary to state what equipment b.

Itfor normal fill and vent procedures.

Rev. 0 4 of 15 O P-AP.22-001( 0)

vr-Av.44-00L(Q)

ATTACBMENT 2 5.0 PROCEDURE This section shall provide step-by-step instructions to the degree required by a qualified operator for the performance of various system operational evolutions.

In addition to providing step-by-step instructions, this section shall also identify to the operator the specific prerequisites which are required for a particular operation / evolution, the precautions which the operator should be cognizant of in the performance of the evolution, and the locations (s) where the operations take place.

The guidelines for the procedure section are as follows:

a.

A separate subsection (i.e.

5.1, 5.2, etc) shall be provided for each distinct system operational evolution.

The operational evolutions which should be discussed are the normal system operational modes as well as infrequent yet reasonable / probable operational modes.

Examples of normal operational modes which should be included are as follows:

- Startup (S/U).

s I

- Shutdown (S/D).

- Placing system in standby.

Examples of infrequent yet probable / reasonable operating modes are:

- Fill and Vent (should be included for all fluid systems unless justified as unnecessary).

- Emergency system actuation / verification

- Shifting of redundant components (if deemed necessary due to complexity of evolution.)

It is not the intent of the SOPS to cover all possible system operating modes or configurations.

The SCPs l

should only cover those modes / configurations which are likely to be utilized on a semi-routine basis.

Abnormal operations (i.e. loss of a major component) should not be covered in the SOP but rather by the Abnormal Operating Procedures ( AOP).

1 GP-AP.12-001(Q) 5 of 15 Rev. O

OP-AP.22-001(Q)

ATTACEMENT 2 For systems in which the majority of the operations b.

the following note occur in the main control room, should be inserted before subsection 5.1.

Placino the Condensate System in Service 5.1 NOTE 5.0 All operations are performed from Panel 10C651E unless otherwise noted.

If an operations also require manipulation of c.

controls at local panels, the location of the panels shall be included as part of Note 5.0.

NOTE 5.0 A. All operations are performed from Panel 10C650 unless otherwise i

noted.

B. Local Panel locations are as follows:

1.10Cl20 Stator Cooling Water Control Panel, Turbine Bldg 102 For operations which take place outside the main d.

control room, the location should be identified by a note after the section/ subsection (if the majority of the operations are at a common panel) or by stating the location in the specific step.

An illustration of the latter is given in the example at the end of this section.

Generally, the first step of the procedure section e.

will be to ensure that the applicable prerequisites have been completed.

Example 5.1.1 Ensure that all Prerequisites have been satisfied IAW Section 2.1 of this procedure.

Anytime the operator is required to read a system f.

parameter (ex. verify pump discharge pressure greater than 50 psig), instrument name and number shall be included in the format of PI-XXXX INSTRUMENT NAME.

Rev. O 6 of 15 CP-AP.22-001(Q)

vr-ar.4. vouw, ATTACEMENT 2 Anytime large pieces of equipment are started, the g.

procedure should instruct the operator to ensure proper operation by monitoring component parameters (i.e., flow, pressure).

This type of verification should also be used when energizing buses in electrical procedures or whenever deemed necessary.

h.

The shutdown of a system should place the system in such a configuration th_at it could be started up via the startup section without having to perform major valve fineup.

This can't always be done but the writer should make the procedure flow as well as possible.

1.

For systems requiring a fill and vent, the valve lineup shall be prepared to support this fill and vent.

In addition, a table showing the alignment of control room operated (or local panel operated, if applicable) valves for system startup should be included in the startup section.

The intent here is two-fold.

First, its assumed that wholesale valve alignments need only be performed occasionally and thus would probably be performed prior to the fill and vent.

Thus, the lineups should support the fill and vent.

Second, the table at the beginning of the startup section allows the operator to place a system in service without having to perform wholesale valves alignments.

Only a motor operated valve lineup is required since manual valve should not have be realigned and should be in their proper position.

i.

The above as well as additional guidelines are illustrated in the following example.

Example 5.0 PROCEDURE NOTE 5.0_

Noto applies to the entire A. All operations are performed from Panel 10C650s unless otherwise noted.

procedure 8.10C120 Feedwater Control Panel, Turbine aldg 137 CP-AP.22-001(O) 7 of 15 Rev. 0

vr-ar...

v.,..

ATTACRMENT 2 Pillina and Ventino the Condensate system 5.1 l

CAUTION 5.1 The Condensate System contains auticn applies potentially radioactively

---e aly to sub-contaminated fluid.

Contact RP saticn 5.1 for any additional precautions and equipment recuired for fill and vent.

Ensure that all Prerequisites have been ndicate bezel 5.1.1 satified IAW Section 2.1, 2.3 of this

Ocdings, procedure.

Local valve n31ud0d when hCnging panel manually cctiens.

operated.

OPEN HV-2111 (CONDENSATE FLOW PATH Caps on omm0nd statement, 5.1.2 first

CDitolized and

' COND MN HDR ISLN VLV letters.

in flined OPEN V026 Cond Mn Hde Vent Viv until a 5.1.3 Contincency solid statement rolvo tag in stream of water issues then CLOSE noin control

~

Underlined.

(local).

roca. All caps.

AE-HV-2000 FDW HDR REC LINE ISLN Talvo not part of VLV (local panel 10C120).

syOcca covered sy SGP.

System d;31gnator NOTE 5.1.5

-pecvided.

HV-2066 will auto close if condenser from local panel., #

Valvo operated level drops below (later).

PCn31 no. given.

Noto cpplies only to stcp 5.1.5.

Rev. O 8 of 15 CP-AP.11-001(0)

ATTACEMENT 2-5.1.5 OPEN HV-2066 //COND DRN VLV//.

Nash marks indicate that 6.0 ATTACRMENTS although the valve is This section shall provide a listing of all attachments to the SOP.

The attachments provide operated from a listing of the following:

control panel, no

- Valve / Damper li'neups switch tag

, *- 2 0 6A

- Major component electrical lineup

. >-415A

- Missing information appears on the panel.

The guidelines and format of the various attachments The name given here are provided on Forms 3 through 5 is a to this procedure.

functional 1

description.

7.0 REFERENCES

I This section shall list all reference material used The list shall be in the preparation of the SOP.

arranged as follows:

S I 4

7.1 P& ID i

7.2 Logic Diagrams 7.3 Electrical Drawing:

l 7.4 Vendor Manual:

7.5 Panel Drawings:

7.6 Valve Index:

7.7 DITS:

7.8 GE Documents 7.9 System

Description:

7.10 FSAR 7.11 Standard Technical Specifications 7.12 Other references The use and listing of references material should adhere to the following guidelines:

i All reference sources except 7.9 and 7.11 can be considered prime source material.

The SOP a.

should be written with regard to prime source material.

Items 7.9 (System Descriptions) and 7.11 b.

(Standard Tech Specs) should be considered secondary source material.

These documents l

are considered secondary source since at this j

time they are not controlled and therefore may i

not reflect the actual plant design.

t l

l i

Rev. 0 9 of 15 CP-AP.tt-001(O)

OP-AP.22-00L(Q)

ATTACEREIrf 2 All of the items listed above should be investigated in If an item is not applicable, "None" c.

preparing an SOP.

should be inserted next to the item.

The Bechtel Document numbers should be used as opposed d.

to GE or vendor numbers.

An example of the above guidelines is presented below:

e.

Example 7.1 P& ID M-51-1, Sht. 1, Rev. 2 M-65-2, Sht. 2, Rev. 3 Sht. 3, Rev. 1 None 7.2 Logic Diagrams:

E-0562-1, Sht. 2 Rev. 4 7.3 Electrical Diagrams:

s e

Rev. O 10 of 15 no-ap.22-001(Q)

ATTAC3N2NT 2

\\

Foin No. 1 ECGS SYSTEN OPERATING Fit 0CEDURE OP-SO.

(Titls) 4

~

\\

v ii Prepared By:

Date 8

Reviewed Byt SRO Date Reviewed By*

Oparating Engr - Hope Creek Date

' ^

Radiation Protection Dept.

Date Reviewed Byt site Engineering 0ept.

Date Reviewed By:

$QAg Date.

SORC Reviews Chairman Date ht9. No.

Approved By:

Operations Mgr - dope CreeY Date CP-AP.23-001(Q) 11 of 15 Rev. O

OP-A P. 21-0 01( Q )

ATTACEMENT 2 Form No. 2 l

(Title)

TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE SECTION TITLE 1.0 PURPOSE.........................................

2.0 PREREQUISITES....................................

3.0 PRECAUTIONS AND LIMITATIONS......................

4.0 EQUI PM ENT R EQU I RE D..............................

1 5.0 PROCEDURE.......................................

l 5.1 (SYSTEM SPECIFIC EVOLUTION).................

l 5.2 l

5.3 l

6.0 ATTACHMENTS......................................

l

7.0 REFERENCES

l l

l i

CF-AP.st-001(o) 12 of 15 Rev. O

F' OP-A P. 3 2-001( Q)

ATTACEMENT 2 Form No. 3 ATTACNMENT

- - - - SYSTEM MANUAL AND REMOTE OPERATED VALVE LINEUP POSITION NUMBER VALVE

OPERATOR FUNCTIONAL NAME DESCRIPTION REQUIRED AS INITIAL FOUND l

l l

l 1.

All system valves including instrument root valves should appear on ATTACHMENT 1 and be listed in numerical order.

I 2.

Valve numbers shall appear as "v025", not "V-025".

Valve operator numbers shall appear as "HV-F026", not "RVF026" 4.

Valves which do not have numbers but appear on the system P&ID should be listed after the numbered valves in the system with "LATER" for a valve number.

5.

Valves which are not part of the system covered by the SOP but are required in the SOP should appear after the non-numbered valves in alpha-numeric order with the system designator included.

6.

Valves which are part of the system covered by the SOP but have been listed in another SOP valve lineup for operability reasons should appear in the valve lineup in their proper numeric place and a reference should be made to the SOP which controls the valve.

The reference should be listed under functional name description.

7.

Damper alignments (HVAC Systems) will follow essentially the same rules as valves.

R 1st verification C

2nd Verification Performed By

/

Date Reviewed By SNSS/NSS Date OP-AP.22-001(Q) 13 of 15 Rev. 0 l

l ATTAC55 TENT 2 Form No. 4 ATThCRMENT

- - - - - - - SYSTEM MAJOR COMPONENT ELECTRICAL LINEUP SHEET agDIPDGNT COMPCNENT DESCRIPTICN MOC/ PANEL BREAKER POSITIG8 INITIAL NL34BER*

IG BER NUNBER AS

~

RENJIRED PGMD 1.

The major component electrical lineup shall include all loads 480V and up as well as 250VDC.

s 2.

The lineup shall be arranged by load center.

3.

Component description should be identified to that which appears on MCC or load center.

C 1st Verification C

2nd Verification Performed By

/

Date Reviewed By SNSS/NSS Date OP-AP.22-001(0)

' 14 of 15 Rev. O

j na...

...su, ATTACEMENT 2 Form No. 5 ATTACHMENT

- - - siTTan LIST OF LATERS The following is a list of missing items of setpoints, e

nomenclature, etc., contained in this procedure to be identified at a later date.

When all "laters" have been removed, this attachment will be deleted.

Section #

4' The following procedures, referenced within this document were not approved at the time of issuance of this procedures i

i l

t i

GP-AP.22-001(Q) 15 of 15 Rev. 0

>

ML20126L162

Text

5.0 ASSESSMENT

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Title:

Title:

Title:

Title:

Title:

Title:

Title:

Title:

7.0 REFERENCES

Description:

7.0 REFERENCES

Navigation menu

Search