ML20126L107
| ML20126L107 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 07/26/1985 |
| From: | Perlis R NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD) |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20126L099 | List: |
| References | |
| OL, NUDOCS 8507310055 | |
| Download: ML20126L107 (2) | |
Text
I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 880KETED
- 0 BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD
'55 Jul. 30 A10:05 In the Matter of
)
GEORGIA POWER C0.
Docket Nos. 50-424 CfFicE or SEc w Asy et al.
)
50-425 GCCKELNG a SERV;'.!
)
(0L)
(Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, )
Units 1 and 2)
)
NRC STAFF RESPONSE TO APPLICANTS' STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS AS TO WHICH N0 GENUINE ISSUE EXISTS TO BE HEARD REGARDING CONTENTION 10.3 Appended to their Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 10.3, Applicants submitted a document entitled " Statement of Material Facts as to which no Genuine Issue Exists to be Heard Regarding Contention 10.3."
That document contained 17 numbered Statements of Material Fact which, pursuant to 10 C.F.R. 52.74S(a), must be eithar controverted by the other parties or wilI be deemed admitted for purposes of any litigation which may involve Contention 10.3.
As explained in the Attached Affidavit of Hukam C. Garg, the NRC Staff agrees with Statements 1 through 13 and 16.
(Garg Affidavit, 5 7).
As further explained in Mr.
Garg's Affidavit, the Staff has no factual knowledge of the material contained in Statements 14, 15 and 17 because the. Staff has not yet performed its audit and review of the Vogtle environmental qualification program.
(Id.). The Staff at this time can therefore neither agree or disagree with the information contained in Statements 14, 15 and 17.
8507310055 850726 PDR ADOCK 0500 4
G
__--A
s-Respectfully submitted.
Robert G. Perlis-Counsel for NRC Staff Dated at Bethesda, Maryland this 26th day of July, 1985
~
~
F