ML20126K595

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Topical Rept Evaluation of WCAP-10444, Vantage 5 Fuel Assembly. Rept Acceptable for Referencing in License Applications.Westinghouse Should Publish Proprietary & Nonproprietary Versions of Rept within 3 Months
ML20126K595
Person / Time
Issue date: 07/18/1985
From: Thomas C
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Rahe E
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, DIV OF CBS CORP.
Shared Package
ML20126K599 List:
References
NUDOCS 8507300348
Download: ML20126K595 (1)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:_ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _

g. ' Mr. E. P. Rahe, Jr., Panager fluclear Safety Department i

Westinghouse Electric Corporation Box 355 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230

Dear Mr. Rahe:

SUBJECT:

ACCEPTANCE FOR REFERENCING OF LICEllSING TOPICAL REPORT WCAP-10444, j " VANTAGE 5 FUEL ASSEPTLY" We have cenpleted our review of the subject topical report submitted by Vestinghouse Electric Corporatico (Westinghouse) letter dated December 30, 1983. We find the report to be acceptable for referencing in license applications i to the extent specified and under the linitaticos delineated in the report and the associated NRC evaluation, which is enclosed. The evaluation defines the basis for acceptance of the report. We do not intend to repeat our review of the matters described in the report and found acceptable Phen the report appears as a reference in license applications, except to assure that the material presented is applicable to the specific plant involved. Our acceptance applies only to the matters described in the report. In accordance with procedures established in fl0 REG-0390, it is requested that Westinghouse publish accepted versions of this report, proprietary and non-proprietary, within three months of receipt of this letter. The accepted versions shall incorporate this letter and the enclosed evaluation between the title page and the abstract. The accepted versions shall include an -A 4 (desicrating accepted) following the report identification symbol. Should our criteria or regulations change such that our conclusions as to the acceptability of the report are invalidated, Westinghouse and/or the applicants referencing the topical report will be expected to revise and resubnit their 1 respective documentation, or submit,4ustification for the continued effective applicability of the topical rerort withcut revision of their respective documentation. i Sincerely, I l Cecil 0. Thomas, Chief j Standardization and Special Projects Brarch Division of Licensing

Enclosure:

As stated DISTRIBUTION I Central File ! SSPB Reading POR } DCS 8507300 h 850710 Pfloonan $DR 70 HBernard HBerkow ENvWEST 'h I'UR l RDiggs j CTheras i YHsif % \\h, HRichings

DLiSSPh, DL55P8 0

$PB PNdottarntm HPe9riard PPehow [07////85 07//-)/85 07/g/85 07 85 I =}}