ML20126J482

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-282/85-08.Corrective Actions:Procedure Sp 1005 Re Nuclear Power Range Daily Calibr Revised to Make Arithmetic Error Less Likely
ML20126J482
Person / Time
Site: Prairie Island Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/31/1985
From: Larson C
NORTHERN STATES POWER CO.
To: Harrison J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
References
NUDOCS 8506100613
Download: ML20126J482 (2)


Text

.- _

Northern States Power Company 414 Nicollet Mau Minneapohs. Minnesota 55401 Telephone (612) 330-5500 May 31, 1985 Mr J J Harrison, Chief Engineering Branch, Region III Office of Inspection and Enforcement U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT Docket Nos. 50-282 License Nos. DPR-42 50-306 DPR-60 In response to your letter of May 2, 1985, which transmitted Inspection Report No. 50-282/85008 (DRS), the following is offered.

Violation Technical Specificatiei 6.5.A.4 requires that detailed written procedures be prepared and followed for surveillance and testing requirements that could have an effect on nuclear safety.

Step 8 of Surveillance Procedure SP 1005, " Unit 1 Nuclear Power Range Daily Calibration," requires that any of the four nuclear power range channels be recalibrated where calculated power is greater than channel indicated power. License No.

DPR-42 requires that steady state reactor core power levels be less than or equal to 1650 megawatts thermal.

Contrary to the above, during the performance of Procedure SP 1005 on March 19 and 20, 1985, the recalibration required by Step 8 was not performed because of a calculational error which made it appear that calculated power was less than indicated power.

In fact, the reverse was true. The failure to recalibrate the nuclear power range instruments led to the license power 1cvel being exceeded by 3 megawatts thermal (0.16%)

based on a calculation of average power level during the eight hour shift from 11:00 p.m. on March 19, 1985, to 7:00 a.m. on March 20, 1985.

(282/85008-03(DRS))

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).

8506100613 850531 PDR ADOCK 05000282 0

PDR

,3g 6 #

l 0

'M oI

r=

r h

o J J H;rrison,-Chiof, I&E May 31, 1985

'*E*

Northem States Power Company

Response

Surveillance procedure SP 1005 (Unit 1 Nuclear Power Range Daily Calibra-tion) involves a daily adjustment of the excore nuclear instrumentation system (NIS) so that indicated power level matches actual power calculated

~

by heat balance on the secondary system.

If indicated power is higher than actual power (within 1/2%), then the NIS is not adjusted.

However, if indicated power is less than actual power, adjustment of the NIS is required. On March 19 and 20, indicated power was erroneously calculated to be higher than actual power, and the NIS was not adjusted. This resulted in steady state operation slightly above the license limit of 1650 megawatts thermal; the maximum 8 hour9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> average power level was 100.16%.

Cause of the event was an error in basic arithmetic during performance of

.the surveillance procedure. The procedure has been revised to make this kind of error less likely. Review of these procedures for both units for the past two months was done; no other errors were found. Full compliance has been achieved.

This event was reported as Unit 1 LER 85-008.

d Sw *

,. m i

C E Larson j

.Vice President Nuclear Generation c: Resident Inspector, NRC l

Project Manager, NRC G. Charnoff L